data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b11cf/b11cfebd0c8648ce720b7df054a39305e374126d" alt=""
Sex Ed Silva smiles and cheers for the statements of Anthony Rendon
“You are the leaders for justice”
WHERE IS THE JUSTICE FOR THESE CHILDREN SHARON?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/176d2/176d2f0c7d1b4e416e941a77e46cb105d7031cfd" alt=""
Sex Ed Sharon smiles at the statements of Anthony Rendon
You are the leaders for opportunity…
WHERE ARE THESE CHILDREN’S OPPORTUNITY SHARON?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6edd7/6edd7116b6f4aeb5def12444e2830fa33be9fbc4" alt=""
Sex Ed Silva looks on….. and on……
“You are what this fight is all about…..”
THIS IS WHAT THIS FIGHT IS ALL ABOUT SHARON
If you cant handle looking at these pictures then there is obviously something wrong with you not doing something to stop this from happening to several thousand children a day here in the United States with churches on every corner that say or do NOTHING about this
We have our local homegrown blood money sellout that pushes sex ed in the schools WITH PLANNED PARENTHOOD CALLING THIS ACCESS TO WOMEN’S HEALTH-READ ABOUT IT HERE –https://thefullertoninformer.com/sex-ed-sharon-quirk-silva-her-pit-of-hell-planned-parenthood-endorsement-and-her-cronies/
PLANNED PARENTHOOD
WELCOME TO FULLERTON CALIFORNIA-HOME TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT MURDERED KELLY THOMAS ON CAMERA IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE WORLD AND WE ONCE AGAIN SENT A EUGENICIST BACK TO SACRAMENTO
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f921/4f921c5ee2169c583cead325f009ddd2b663024c" alt=""
Planned Parenthoods Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk Silva
THE 65TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT IS IN THE GRIPS OF FULL EUGENICS WITH FORCED CHILDHOOD SCHOOL ENTRY VACCINATIONS AND FORCED WIRELESS EXPOSURE IN SCHOOLS WHICH ARE BOTH A STERILIZATION AGENDA. IF SHE REALLY CARED ABOUT WOMENS HEALTH, OR ANYONE’S HEALTH FOR THAT MATTER, SHE WOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT BOTH.
Shelli, Diane, Shelly, and 1 other thanked you
Debbie Tetley from Raymond Hills · 16h ago
When it rains, we are at 200% of average snow pack. Hire back those gardeners. Green, weedless lawns all around!!! : )
Edited 16h ago
Debbie Tetley from Raymond Hills · 16h ago
Sorry for the off topic Joe, but you mentioned rain and pour. : )
Edited 15h ago
Diane Hickey from Raymond Hills · 6h ago
Relative to your post, please see min 4:55 for further explanation of 5G and placement of DAS, wireless antennas in our neighborhoods, and impacts to our health. This legislation will “streamline” the process for cell tower siting, gut the 1996 TAC in order to do so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s015jVDD…
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 5h ago
223 scientists from 39 countries all disagree with Roman Schulze, Mark Shapiro and even Erik Wehn who calls himself a scientist who all say this is all safe. You can sue Schulze, Shapiro and Wehn if you get sick from this stuff because they have held themselves out as experts claiming this is all safe. It is not folks. To make matters worse, our city council, all of five of them, have ignored this for four years along with Sharon Quirk Silva and Young Kim in the Assembly and now it is coming down to the wire.It is bad enough what is going on in the schools that is being ignored. 223 scientists from 39 countries are all wrong? Microwaves are a weapon and it is time to grow up and face reality. We are all under attack..
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 5h ago
Greg Sebourn, Bruce Whitaker, Jennifer Fitzgerald, Jan Flory, Doug Chaffee and even Jesus Silva have spent years ignoring this issue. They have chosen to ignore their duty and responsibility to protect the residents of Fullerton. Now the local control is about to be removed from the very ones that REFUSED to excercise it when they had the chance. Young Kim even voted for AB 57 ignoring tens of thousands of pages of research and testimony that was presented at the hearings by my colleagues. Her approval of AB 57 has this all coming to fruition that much closer to reality.
By the way, this is not a political discussion. This is a discussion about health and safety as it relates to our community.
Matt Karaffa from Downtown Fullerton · 5h ago
Oh fun, this again. Since there’s no point in arguing with someone so incapable of rational thought, I’ll just leave this here:
You’re wrong, this is a waste of time, and you’re wrong. Anyone thinking there’s something worth pursuing here, you’re wrong, too. Have a good day!
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 4h ago
Matt Karaffa versus 229 scientists from 29 countries and Matt Karaffa works for a company that makes wireless devices
Diane Hickey from Raymond Hills · 3h ago
.
jim mack from Rolling Hills · 2h ago
You are coming out for regulations and against big industry. The party you support isn’t supporting you, but they are thankful for your vote.
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 2h ago
Jim I am coming out for citizen input to stop the roll out of microwave systems on all the light poles and power poles, on schools, and government buildings. Both sides of the political aisle have sold us down the river. This is not a partisan or political issue. This is an issue of public health.
John R. Hogerhuis from Raymond Hills · 2h ago
I hear they’re making suits in tinfoil now. Perhaps that is a self-help avenue to explore?
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 2h ago
They better make 229 of them, one for each scientist that has come out against this and get ready to ship them to 39 countries real fast. John, have you considered the health of the hundreds of CKE employees that are FORCED to wear wireless headsets all day that are the equivalent of a cell phone being in use all day glued to their head? Are you responsible for that in some way with your role at CKE? How about the wireless transmitters in proximity to their abdomen that the employees at CKE are forced to wear all day?
I find it disturbing that those that make their living off of proliferating these dangerous devices are the ones who step right up and attack the messenger. It must be some sort of catharsis or something.
Desiree St from Raymond Hills · 1h ago
I contacted our senators about this. Thank you.
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 1h ago
Thank you Desiree
Matt Karaffa from Downtown Fullerton · 1h ago
Hmm, maybe we should notify the rest of the scientists (Thousands – 229) that they’re all wrong. We’ll tell them our local crackpot with an insane website filled with absurd conspiracy theories said so.
Also, no, I don’t work for a company that makes wireless devices, so your insinuation that I’m some sort of corporate shill is hilarious, and kind of creepy, to be honest. What are you doing, stalking me on the internet? As far as I know, we’ve never met, and I’ve never discussed my employment status with you.
Diane Hickey from Raymond Hills · 55m ago
Matt Karaffa,
Why is it that every time information about the bio hazards of wireless radiation are posted to NextDoor, you appear on the post refuting it? You refute not only the hundreds of EMF scientists but decades of science?
I find that odd and “kind of creepy.” Because of that pattern, you appear desperate to silence this message.
The fact is that people are getting sick from these exposures, I know some of them and, as wireless devices proliferate, this population of sick is increasing.
Why don’t you contact the scientists and begin to understand what they do?
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 52m ago
Matt, please feel free to contact the scientists yourself. Have a conversation with them and maybe you will learn something that your employer forbids you to discuss. Matt you work for a company called Marvell Technologies who makes wireless devices, and your comments on The Fullerton Informer show up under their IP address when you post them. You are a staunch supporter of wireless technology based on your comments on my site and this forum.
Matt Karaffa from Downtown Fullerton · 51m ago
“Matt you work for a company called Marvell Technologies who makes wireless devices”
Oh, really? You’re doing a poor job stalking me. Work harder, creep.
jim mack from Rolling Hills · 46m ago
We can measure the energy present in various wavelengths of radiation, and accurately predict their effects on tissue. We can predict exactly at what millisecond a molecule of water will evaporate based on the change in temperature from any particular energy source.
It is that science that is refuting your ‘information’
jim mack from Rolling Hills · 41m ago
Cranks can make great money pushing their theories. No one is willing to pay actual scientists to fight this misinformation; it’s up to a few volunteers to defend science on their own time/dime.
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 35m ago
Matt, Google reveals http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Matthew-Karaff…
I do not know why you pop up like a jack in the box calling me all kinds of names as soon as I hit your proverbial nerve with the word wireless. You have doubled down multiple times insisting wireless is safe. You are at odds with decades of research and thousands of scientific studies. The 5G rollout will utilize even higher frequencies which have NEVER BEEN TESTED for their affects on human health. How can you call me insane when forcibly exposing entire populations when this being the case actually defines insanity? It is actually criminal.There are people in this community that are very threatened by this information because they are employed in fields that are directly connected to it. That is not a valid justification to harm everyone else in the process by trying to detract from message here. We need to be protected from the industry that is proceeding full speed ahead. It is already fully deployed in the schools despite the years we have sounded the alarm and the same people that defended that show up here to defend this. I don’t have an explanation for that behavior.
Diane Hickey from Raymond Hills · 32m ago
Really? How would they be making money? There is no fortune to be made by these scientists in telling the truth. In fact, the price for them is high.
CTIA owns the conversation. Maybe you should ask to get compensated, wireless is the largest market in the world. They have plenty of resources, shills to pay someone like you, a ‘volunteer.’
Meanwhile, people continue to be harmed.
Matt Karaffa from Downtown Fullerton · 29m ago
That’s funny, that’s far from up-to-date. The fact that your first avenue of attacking me is assuming I have some financial stake in this is hilarious, though, and telling as to your way of thinking.
You just keep thinking that you’re not gullible for believing stupid conspiracy theories, and that the rest of the world is too dumb or evil to get behind you, and only you, the guy that thinks the earth is flat, is the only one who can save us from all the scary scientists that are part of a global conspiracy to do something… that you haven’t specified… that will make The Illuminati control the world… because that’s totally a real thing… You’re not crazy at all!
Diane Hickey from Raymond Hills · 28m ago
EMF & developing children:
Diane Hickey from Raymond Hills · 21m ago
For all you guys out there, RF-radiation & ED:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NlCXycE…
jim mack from Rolling Hills · 21m ago
But there are many different forms of wireless radiation, and a lot of the literature you quote just uses that blanket term. Even humans give off wireless radiation! The real question is about what wavelength and at what distance, and that’s where some of the literature you point us to deliberately puts everything all in one box.
I agree that modern science doesn’t know everything, and that there should be higher standards of testing in general before testing on humans starts, especially children! I just think this is a pretty well examined area, and using the word wireless to describe both WIFI routers, industrial power transformers, microwaves, and laser beams misleads more than it reveals.
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · 15m ago
Jim, here is an industry crank turned crank in your vernacular https://thefullertoninformer.com/dr-georg…
jim mack from Rolling Hills · 12m ago
Where do all you science listeners sit on human accelerated global warming?
jim mack from Rolling Hills · 6m ago
Joe, that guy has lied about so many things it’s hard to take him seriously. I’d say he’s permanently tarnished:http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Geo…
He has been pro agent orange, pro chlorine, pro tobacco, pro cell phone, and it seems like this might be blackmail/revenge when he couldn’t get any more money.
Your heart is in the right place, Joe, even though I disagree with you.
Joe Imbriano from Raymond Hills · Just now
He has played both sides of the fence but that is exactly why both sides need to be looked at. Here is another article and Hardell’s work is cited. He is a lot cleaner. https://thefullertoninformer.com/experts-…