There are two kinds of pedophiles.   The first kind are those who recognize the evil desire they have toward children and try to fight the urges to re-committ these heinous crimes.   These pedophiles try to stay away from places, which prove to be the greatest temptation; i.e. schools, parks, playgrounds, etc.   The second kind of pedophile feels absolutely no remorse and is on the hunt for innocent children 24/7.   Which kind of pedophile do you think sues governments to repeal laws that restrict them from living near a school, park or day-care center?  Which city with a proven false legal justification decided anyway to repeal our law without any legal fight….our Fullerton City Council, all of them…MAYOR BRUCE WHITAKER, COUNCI MEMBERS JENNIFER FITZGERALD, GREG SUBORN, DOUG CHAFFEE AND HUSBAND TO STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER SHARON QUIRK-SILVA, HESUS SILVA!   THEY KNEW BECAUSE MYSELF AND OTHERS TOLD THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THER HAS BEEN NO CALIFORNIA COURT DECISION AT ANY LEVEL that has dealt with the residence restriction of ONLY CHILD SEX OFFENDERS in our State of California, arguably the most far-left state in the nation.   I hope and pray that one day soon, the good people of Fullerton will hold each and everyone of those arrogant, deceitful and contemptible council members accountable for their despicable votes to leave our children in Fullerton more vulnerable to pedophiles.


What would you call five Fullerton City Council members who allows a complete falsehood presented by our City Attorney Office, by James Touchstone that wrongly stated that our Fullerton Law Ord. No. 3149 applied to all sex offenders when I read them the law that stated clearly that a sex offender for definition of this law and its implementation to not allow only pedofiles to live within 2,000 feet of a school, park or day-care center was for only child sex offenders. I would call them deceitful, disingenuous and apparently unconcerned about the physical safety of our Fullerton children. My dad a very good and honest man and a career NYC Police officer had a word for such people and it was degenerates!

Pedogate arrests.

It is said that pedophiles include “pillars of the community” — government officials, judges, police, lawyers, doctors, teachers, priests, ministers and…

, , , , ,

  1. #1 by Barry Levinson on October 4, 2017 - 2:45 pm

    Does any despicable, deceitful, disingenuous acts shame these very poor excuses for our representatives?

    Fullertonians are you finally learning the truth about Mayor Bruce Whitaker and Council member Jennifer Fitzgerald?

  2. #2 by Anonymous on October 4, 2017 - 5:53 pm

    Mr. Levinson,
    First of all, what makes you such an expert on pedophiles?
    You know damn well everything you are saying is BS. Your utter hatred for, and personal vendetta against Whitaker and Fitzgerald is so very obvious and has scrambled your perception on pretty much everything.

    • #3 by Joe Imbriano on October 4, 2017 - 5:56 pm

      Barry Levinson is an expert on the laws regarding pedophiles he helped get one passed in Fullerton after years of consultation with experts. Barry Levinson was even on the dr. Phil Show on this very issue he didn’t just fall off the turnip truck. As far as hatred of anybody on the city council very doesn’t hate anybody the only thing Barry hates is evil because he is a man of integrity. What is extremely rare about mr. Levinson is that his political involvement is not overshadowed by a corrupt and immoral Persona that normally embodies everybody that holds office in Southern California for the most part they’re all on the take and they’re all a bunch of crap Liars look around and open your eyes. The Fullerton city council is a complete joke and I would say Barry is spot-on with his assessments

      • #4 by Anonymous on November 11, 2017 - 8:37 am

        So he wants to get rid of his neighbor AND he was on the Dr. Phil show…. sure, that qualifies him as a constitutional law expert and tell the city council how to waste tax payer money.

        The city council may well be a joke for a variety of reasons. The only clown making them look sane is Barry Levinson.

    • #5 by Anonymous on October 5, 2017 - 10:07 pm

      Joe and Barry seem really focused on pedophiles and children’s reproductive systems.

      There may be some projection going on…

  3. #6 by Barry Levinson on October 5, 2017 - 9:45 am

    Anonymous, Mr Imbriano answered your question very well. But what makes you an expert to say that everything I am saying is BS Anonymous. First of all put your real name with your mouth Anonymous or go away. I believe people have the right to speak on this forum Anonymously but when you use it consistently only to falsely denigrate people with no supporting knowledge or evidence ,it just proves you are a phony coward probably related to our corrupt city government.

  4. #7 by Anonymous on October 6, 2017 - 8:38 am

    Perhaps you should stop lying Barry. Your assertion that no california court has dealt with restrictions on where child molesters can live is nonsense. Dozens of cities have been sued – successfully I might add – or threatened with lawsuits over the unconstitutionality of such residency restrictions. Furthermore, the restrictions are meaningless anyway as 99.999999-percent of pedophiles prey on children they know. A relative, neighbor, child of a friend, ect. They seek positions that give them access to children, such as coaches and teachers and counselors. It is extremely rare for these predators to stalk unfamiliar children in parks or playgrounds.

  5. #8 by Barry Levinson on October 6, 2017 - 2:57 pm

    Please disclose where a law only restricts the residency of child sex offenders like the Fullerton Ord. No 3149 has been overturned by the courts Please provide the specific case. There is none you lying cowardly piece of garbage.

    • #9 by voiceofreason on October 6, 2017 - 3:21 pm

      In re Taylor. Which deals with those convicted of sex offenses WHILE on active parole. Which is a much much smaller sub-set than those convicted of sex offenses against those under the age of 18 (“children” – ha!). Therefore covering those.

      You are welcome, you ignorant pompous twit!

  6. #10 by Anonymous on October 6, 2017 - 11:03 pm

    Voice of Reason, Bravo!

  7. #11 by Barry Levinson on October 7, 2017 - 9:32 am

    Some recent case law talks about not allowing all sex offenders to live within 2000 feet of a school, park, etc. as too broad of a restriction. Those laws, which are almost 1005 of them which restricts all sex offenders residency areas should be amended to only impact pedophiles.

    All sex offender parolees includes mostly those who offended against adults not children.

    I recognized that to be upheld in the Ca. courts, the restriction must be narrow and make sense. Trying to keep pedophiles away from places where children congregate makes sense.

    No one knows for sure how courts in Ca. will rule on cases in the future but they have not dealt with any specific law like Fullerton’s now former law, Ordinance 3149, that only restricted convicted edophiles and not the majority of sex offenders who offend against adults.

    Find any Ca. case law that says otherwise or stop misinforming the public.

    We have some very sick people in society that would mislead the public in order to put children in harms way.

    By the way, you are a Voice of Intentional Misleading of the Public!!

  8. #12 by voiceofreason on October 8, 2017 - 8:02 am

    “Trying to keep pedophiles away from places where children congregate makes sense.” – Why?

  9. #13 by Fullerton's Conscience on November 3, 2017 - 3:35 pm

    So let us review the actions of one Jennifer Fitzgerald.

    She defends the so-called comic, Andy Dick after he calls all people with Autism, retards at an Event held in Fullerton to raise monies for people with Autism.

    She knowingly votes to repeal a Fullerton law that Mr. and Mrs. Levinson helped get passed to protect our children from pedophiles by allowing the false city attorney claim that our law was not constitutional because it restricted all sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school, park or day-care center. She voted to repeal Ord. No. 3149 knowing that the Fullerton law only restricts pedophiles, those convicted of sexual crimes against children not all sex offenders. How do I know she intentionally ignored the facts of our law? It is very simple. I heard Mr. Levinson not once but twice speak in front of the council when this repeal was before them and he read the pertinent passages of the law to prove that the law was not unconstitutional because our narrow law applied against only child sex offenders and this narrow law had not been litigated at any level of court in the entire state of California.

    Yet Ms. Fitzgerald states repeatedly that she loves Fullerton. So she displays her love by defending Andy Dick who comes to Fullerton and calls all people with autism retards and then votes to repeal a law that allows pedophiles to live next to a school, park or day-care center.

    Bullying by a so-called celebrity toward kids, etc. with special needs and taking away protections from our children specifically against child sexual predators is not my definition of love Ms. Fitzgerald.

  10. #14 by A Fullerton Observer on November 3, 2017 - 4:04 pm

    How does our Congressman Ed Royce repeatedly endorse and support her for Fullerton City Council? Does he defend her disgusting actions above? Will he support her when she runs for higher office? What about the editorial board of the Orange County Register newspaper? What is their excuse for endorsing her in 2012 and then again in 2016? Why have both been silent about the undependable actions of one Fullerton Council member Jennifer Fitzgerald?

    Ed Royce has been our council member for far too long and he seems to have lost all touch with the needs and wants of the community he is supposed to represent.

    • #15 by Anonymous on November 7, 2017 - 8:01 pm

      Simple. Ed Royce is a creep just like Fitzgerald is.

  11. #16 by Anonymous on November 12, 2017 - 10:56 am

    They are among us.

  12. #17 by Corey on November 17, 2017 - 11:16 pm

    Hey Barr Barr, another domino down…

    Didn’t see you there arguing in favor of wasting tax payer monies to keep this abomination of an ordinance. What – the City of Highland too far for you to save dem childrenz? That is what -a one hour drive?

    I know I know this is not your cleverly worded extra special ordinance. You know, the one that lets you kick out your neighbors from their property. Because that is what it is all about, isn’t it, Barry? You and your home and your neighbors.

  13. #18 by A Fullerton Observer on November 20, 2017 - 8:24 pm

    Corey if you favor pedophiles over child safety then you are one sick individual.

  14. #19 by Corey on November 20, 2017 - 10:10 pm

    A Fullerton Observer, I favor the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights over hysterics that benefit one particular person at the expense of the entire city population.

    Surely you do not buy that this ordinance – at any point – had anything to do with child safety.

  15. #20 by A Fullerton Observer on November 21, 2017 - 9:18 am

    The Fullerton law, nor any law restricting where just convicted child sex offenders live has ever been adjudicated in any California court. So you do favor pedophiles having greater access to damage children permanently. As I have explained the only pedophile who fights any law stating they can not live near a school or a park where children gather is a pedophile who feels no remorse for his dastardly deeds and is looking forward to committing more sexual crimes against children.

    You probably are either a pedophile yourself or have no children you care about at all.

    What a guy!

    • #21 by Corey on December 1, 2017 - 11:53 pm

      So are you seriously supporting your claim with a personal statement you made earlier? That is rich. Let’s see….

      There is no shortage of stupid people saying anything to get their way and reap personal benefits.

      As I have explained earlier, the only person who would willingly violate the State Constitution is one who is stupid and stands to benefit personally. As I have explained. Heee….

      Seriously… the offenses requiring one to register as a sex offender include no shortage of offenses that are anything but dastardly. And even if so….. is it your serious contention that not allowing such a person to reside less than an 8 minute stroll from a school or park discourages such a person from walking 8 minutes from his front door and abusing a random child in a school or park?

      Remember… this is about protecting children IN schools and parks. NOT about banishing people from living at Lake Terrace or Lake Knoll Drive.

      I am not a pedophile and I have children. And my greatest fear for my children is people like you. And that makes me a great American.

  16. #22 by A Fullerton Observer on November 21, 2017 - 9:41 am

    Corey are you a pedophile?

    • #23 by Corey on December 1, 2017 - 11:43 pm

      A Fullerton Observer are you an idiot who does not know the meaning of the term pedophile?

(will not be published)

Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved. is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!