TERRIFIC SUMMATION OF HOW DESPICABLY THE FULLERTON CITY COUNCIL (BRUCE WHITAKER, JENNIFER FITZGERALD, GREG SUBOURN, JESUS SILVA, DOUG CHAFFEE AND THE THE CITY ATTORNEY (DICK JONES AND A PARTNER JAMES TOUCHSTONE) REPEALED OUR CHILD SEX RESIDENCY RESTRICTION ORDINANCE (3149) BACK IN FEBRUARY 2017. By Barry Levinson


What do you call elected officials that ignore when an official presentation by their own city attorney’s office is false? You call them Mayor Doug Chaffee, Council members Bruce Whitaker, Jennifer Fitzgerald, Greg Sebourn and Jesus Silva.

 

 
Question: Why would a proven lie about which sex offenders are covered (all sex offenders in California’s Jessica’s Law vs. only Child Sex Offenders in the former Fullerton City Ordinance, No. 3149) be allowed to stand without not one person on the Fullerton City Council dais acknowledging the falsehood presented by City Attorney James Touchstone?  Touchstone erroneously stated that Ordinance No. 3149 covered all sex offenders, which is a blatant falsehood. Why would they not correct the record when Joe Imbriano, Diane Hickey and myself pointed it out to them at council real time, prior to making a decision to rescind that ordinance based largely on that proven falsehood?

Bruce Whitaker

CHARACTER COUNTS as I proclaimed in the above video and not one person on the dais including the City Attorney Dick Jones, nor our Interim Police Chief acknowledged the egregious error. When an egregious error from our city attorney in an official presentation to council is brought to the attention of our city leaders, and they ignore correcting it, one could easily conclude that the error was in fact intentional. The fact that not one of the council members responded to us leads one to believe their was collusion on this issue, a clear Brown Act violation. So Dick Jones our City Attorney not only ignored the fact that his partner in his law firm Jones and Mayer misinformed the public with his false presentation and then Jones refused to acknowledge that error but also apparently ignored a very likely Brown Act violation.
Their actions potentially made our kids less safe by siding with a formerly convicted sex offender who filed lawsuits against 17 municipalities in California. The fact that our law was much more specific on who it impacted and covered was something that our city wanted not only to desperately ignore but to attempt to fool the public as well in the process. These are the actions of morally bankrupt elected and appointed officials and they should be roundly condemned for their scurrilous actions.
 
If you remember one thing come next election day, it is the above charade carried out by our City of Fullerton government at the expense of our children’s safety.   With the knowledge what are entire city council did above, I know all of you will do the right thing and kick their corrupt, morally bankrupt backsides out of office permanently.
 
I report,  you decide.
By Barry Levinson

, , , , ,

  1. #1 by Anonymous on December 23, 2017 - 9:35 am

    Barry Levinson knows what he is talking about.

  2. #2 by Anonymous on December 23, 2017 - 4:31 pm

    At 13 seconds, someone should have called an ambulance. That guy looks like he is gonna croak.

  3. #3 by Anonymous on December 23, 2017 - 7:11 pm

    Typical arrogant bastards ignoring the voters. Vote them all out.

  4. #4 by Anonymous on December 24, 2017 - 10:01 am

    They are so arrogant and so lacking in any moral fiber that each and every one of them including a mother, Jennifer Fitzgerald went along with the lie. I guess it is okay to collude in order to protect pedophiles.
    Why would they favor convicted pedophiles over innocent, defenseless children?
    One could guess that they relate better to predators than to children or maybe they do not think child sex offenders are sick, dangerous people.

  5. #5 by A Determined Fullerton Resident for Justice on December 24, 2017 - 1:21 pm

    Do you notice how guilty they all look as Mr. Levinson speaks the truth before them.

    Mr. Levinson was able to do the impossible, which is wiping the smirk off Jennifer Fitzgerald’s face.

    Please notice that Whitaker and Sebourn look like they are slightly shaking their heads up and down as to agree with Mr. Levinson’s comments. I bet they did not intend to that but sometimes the truth comes out in mysterious ways.

    • #6 by Alfredo on December 25, 2017 - 9:21 am

      Barry, they are afraid of you and Joe. They have never dealt with people that don’t back down. You guys are terrific. They are feeling the heat. You make it so obvious to anyone pating attention that Jennifer is truly a disgusting human being.

  6. #7 by Barry Levinson on December 26, 2017 - 12:27 pm

    Alfredo they are very afraid that the truth will become well known among most Fullertonians.

    What would really shake them up if people just like you showed up at the next council meeting, which I just learned will not be until the Tuesday Jan. 16 at 6:30 PM. Please all those that are tired of their phony and very deceptive ways to come and speak out during public comments. Nothing better than a few fresh faces telling them that they are not fooling anyone to rattle their cages.

    They cancelled the regularly scheduled first meeting of the month that was to be held on Tuesday January 2, 2018. I guess for them the holiday season extends further than traditional Christmas to New Years and it was too much trouble for them to meet later than week or the following week. Of course doing the people’s business should of course take precedence but not for our merry band of self-serving council members. Will their lack of fiduciary responsibilities and their arrogance ever end? Answer: NO. That means it is up to us to either remove all of them at the 2018 and 2020 election days or simply recall them.

  7. #8 by Jared on January 7, 2018 - 10:15 pm

    People don’t need a corrupt government to protect them. You can freely associate or not associate with any person or group. Communities can form their own security arrangements if they choose to. You could rely on private security instead of the police state you despise. Are you for the police state or against it?

    • #9 by Anonymous on January 10, 2018 - 5:40 pm

      We’ve got a real, live lolbertarian on our hands here!

  8. #10 by Fullerton - The Most Corrupt City in California on January 9, 2018 - 9:33 am

    Jared you are suggesting a vigilante style justice. There are plenty of problems with today’s police departments but eradicating them is not the solution.

    • #11 by Jared on January 11, 2018 - 1:08 am

      In many parts of the world, the police are a no-show, except to collect taxes and crack down on small businesses. People rely on cultural practices and entrepreneurs to stay safe and resolve disputes. The only laws that matter in their day-to-day lives are contracts and property rights.
      With a little organization, any neighbourhood can form a
      cheap subscription-based security service that provides a full-time security patrol. The subscribers could also set burglar alarms to notify the patrol, and allow for an armed response.
      This kind of arrangement is common in countries like South Africa, but also in some American neighborhoods. If you’re really worried about paedophiles, you can move to a community with a gate that doesn’t allow them.

      None of this requires “eradicating” the police. But refusing to rely on the police for protection takes away their moral righteousness. Everything they do is justified with the belief that WE NEED THEM. What if we don’t?

  9. #12 by Barry Levinson on January 11, 2018 - 10:24 am

    On a typical evening, there are less than 30 to 50 citizens showing up for a council meeting who do not have an agenda item specifically related to them. Good luck getting 400 to 500 volunteering part-time to police the city on a regular basis. We are currently in a period where citizen involvement in government affairs is at an all-time low.

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!