Now that Joe Felz gets away with drunk driving will Dan Hughes and other Fullerton Police officers get away with obstruction of justice?


———- Forwarded message ———-
From: The Fullerton Informer <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:01 PM
Subject: California Public Records Act Request Joe Felz incident on 11-9-16.

To: Mea Klein <MeaK@ci.fullerton.ca.us>, “Lucinda M. Williams” <LucindaW@ci.fullerton.ca.us>
Cc: council@cityoffullerton.com,

Pursuant to my rights under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.), I ask to obtain a copy of the following items, which I understand to be held by your agency:

I ask for a determination on this request within 10 days of your receipt of it, and an even prompter reply if you can make that determination without having to review the record[s] in question.

Why did the officers on the scene contact Dan Hughes first before arresting a man who was caught red handed fleeing the scene of an accident emitting an odor of alcohol.

Why the initial officers on the scene were not qualified to conduct an FCT upon arrival.

Names and official title of every officer involved in the event.

Name of watch commander that took the phone or radio call from the first officers on the scene.

Which officers first arriving on scence allowed Joe Felz to contact Dan Hughes at that time of the morning?

What FPD employee gave the order to the officers to turn off their cameras?

Which officers complied with this order?

Confirm that none of the original officers on the scene gave Joe Felz

Transcript of the 911 call or call for service.

Transcript of the official call that Dan Hughes made to Jennifer Fitzgerald.

Names of the first officers to arrive on scene.

Name of the CSI investigator, photographs taken at the scene and copies of any reports filed.

What if any field sobriety test was conducted, where it was conducted, when it was conducted, who conducted it, who was present when it was given and the results of the test as well as the video of the test. Please provide official support for all the normal procedures that were violated.

What was the purpose of Dan Hughes ordering the on scene officers to not administer the breathalyzer until Sgt. Corbett arrived.

What official FPD policy allowed for the intentional delaying of gathering evidence as the BAC drops with elapsed time and ascertaining this information as timely as possible is the only way justice can be served.

How was Hughes order to hold up the investigation not obstruction of justice and we have his own memo that states just that.

Timeline of all the different events as they happened.

Clarification of the comment from Dan Hughes’ 11-9-16 memo-What is the basis of the CHP being involved in the investigation?

Who made the determination not to arrest Joe Felz?

Who made the determination to drive Joe Felz home?

Who drove Joe Felz home?

What happened to Joe Felz car?

Copy of the tow bill along with who paid it?

Photographs of the loose wires under the dash of his car.

Any and all video and audio, not limited to the AXON and DASH CAM video and audio recordings involving all of the officers on the scene and invloved in the chain of command that night, as well as Dan Hughes as well as phone records, text messages as well as all written instructions and reports pertaining to the response to call for service by the Fullerton Police department resulting from the Joe Felz incident on 11-9-16.

If you determine that any or all or the information qualifies for an exemption from disclosure, I ask you to note whether, as is normally the case under the Act, the exemption is discretionary, and if so whether it is necessary in this case to exercise your discretion to withhold the information.

If you determine that some but not all of the information is exempt from disclosure and that you intend to withhold it, I ask that you redact it for the time being and make the rest available as requested.

In any event, please provide a signed notification citing the legal authorities on which you rely if you determine that any or all of the information is exempt and will not be disclosed.

If I can provide any clarification that will help expedite your attention to my request, please contact me at  joeimbriano777@gmail.com

Please notify me of any duplication costs exceeding $50 before you duplicate the records so that I may decide which records I want copied.
Joe Imbriano
  1. #1 by Anonymous on January 18, 2018 - 9:20 pm

    Corbett has finally been placed on administrative leave. It’s election time, TRack has no choice but to prosecute Hughes, Corbett and others. Will he throw the case like with Kelly Thomas? Highly likely.

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!