Dr George Carlo: The Wireless Industry is Committing Scientific Fraud


 

Ray Grasse’s article on “Wheels of Change” in the Oct./Nov. issue of Mountain Astrologer notes that the decade following 9/11 witnessed a restructuring of the US economy. The US military was also re-structured to establish smaller military bases in more locations. The US forced other nations to increase radio frequency exposure limits to accommodate US radar, surveillance, and weaponry.

The “Five Eyes” nations of the military-industrial complex, including the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, assume that the only action that causes harm from radiofrequency is heating, while 40% of the world’s populations is protected by RF limits that recognize adverse impacts below the thermal threshold, including breakdown of the blood-brain-barrier and double DNA breaks.

Americans have been sold a bill of goods that wireless technology is the wave of the future, as well as the way to address climate change. The installation of wireless smart utility meters, industrial-scale Wi-Fi in schools, and the cultivated demand for faster and more powerful cellphones and wireless devices requiring more towers and antennas are stimulating the wireless economy and health care sector, while destroying the health of the ecosystem. The industry is employing the same strategies as the tobacco industry by corrupting the science, but instead of hiring marketers to convince consumers to buy a toxic product, it is more efficient to convince a small group of governors and legislators to pass mandates and laws while manipulating the core values of the populace who believe that buying a compact fluorescent light bulb is sustainable.

“Robert Hand’s article on the Precession of the Capricorn Solstice looks to 2017 as a critical time. When the World Health Organization meets again to review the epidemiology regarding RF the classification will not be “possible human carcinogen”; it will be definite carcinogen. The data will not come from Austria, Switzerland, China, Italy, Russia, or other nations with limits RF hundreds of times lower than those set by the US military for the purposes of war and exported widely.The data will be generated by cancer rates for women and children in the US. If environmentalists cleaning up the legacy of toxic chemicals and fossil fuels do not awaken to the damages unfolding from the unexamined and unmonitored commoditization of the electromagnetic spectrum, time is running out for the US.” —-Patricia Burke
Millis MA

unnamed-1-297x300Folks, the fact is that you are destroying your children and all for what?

33984_479084712158056_1011868072_n-1-300x2251 So you can keep your stupid new car, your jobs taking part in all of this, your careers that you have exchanged for your lineage, your phony friends that will turn on you on a dime, your nail appointments and soap opera time, your drinking buddies, your fleeting thinly veneered high school reputations that mean nothing, your bush league political connections, or for your disneyland denial bubble that you refuse to realize that it is going to pop.

ipad-in-palm-beach-300x199For your kids, it all starts with your complicity when you dump them off at school where they spend the entire day jammed in a room with 35 cell phone emission equivalents known as iPads (infertility pads) humming away all day everyday and irradiating away exposing their brains, hearts and reproductive organs and then at home to do their homework. Then they will be up at all hours of the night once they get addicted to the video games just so you can prepare them for jobs that don’t exist and so you can watch the stupid ball game or your vampire porn on the idiot box. download (14) images (49)

Yes first stop the optometrist from too much blue glow flicker rate manipulated screen time, then the orthodontist from the microwave exposure induced melatonin disruption yielding insomnia, malnutrition, screentime addiction induced sunlight deprivation induced vitamin D deficiency, poor eating habits, sedentary lifestyle and microwave exposure altered gene expression.

unnamed (5)

then the the reproductive endocrinologist from the intentionally designed microwave induced ovary damage from the loving

images-20 satanic apple computer company, Apple Headquarters #3larger cupertino #2unnamed (5)666

then the oncologist

10405298_1518785598384127_418869795011137012_n

images (54) WiFi Is Radiation

and finally the embalmer when the 5FU chemo drip finally kills them at age 35.

image001-13-300x224

Trust me wireless is safe

images (55)

All for an iPad and a seat at the PTA meeting. Folks the future does not involve your children having children, living a full life or ever having the ability to think critically and realize what is being done to them with your blessing.

530b9430ef2d794e7600098e_Artemis_Logo_On_Black-e1413594731313 (1)images-8 (2)

That is of course unless you have the courage and wisdom to rescue them and stop this holocaust. The agenda is real, and it is right out in the open-it is called DEPOPULATION BY STERILZATION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN.

https://thefullertoninformer.com/apple-666-project-inkwell-and-agenda-21-an-expose-with-an-all-star-cast/

download (18) images (57)

What have they done to all of our children? images (50)

images (59)images (58)

images (51)images (52)

 

What have they done to all of you dads?

images (33)10704118_783272061739318_7729878635650091784_n

barmaid_beer_1110644c-155x155images-36

download (16)download (15)

How do you sit back and let them destroy your children?

Ladies what has become of you as you sit back and take part in this?

1926117_740542549373518_8948046679846530280_o

unnamed (3)Disney-Ladies-disney-leading-ladies-6076736-1347-1050download (29)kennedyimages-35images (22)

May God help us, folks, may God help us.

  1. #1 by Eric on January 8, 2015 - 10:11 am

    Joe, you are a very wise and a very brave man. I am praying for you bro. You always hit the nail on the head. People don’t like that at all, especially the ones that are comfortable making money from what is going on. It is going out here too-all over in all of the schools. Its everywhere.

  2. #2 by Angie B on January 8, 2015 - 12:02 pm

    EMF, all over, everywhere . . .

    It is the largest public health disaster in the history of mankind.

  3. #3 by Amy on January 8, 2015 - 12:48 pm

    Mr. Imbriano, without people like yourself, this issue would stay buried. Here is more evidence of criminal activity for your audience.

    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/RF-Microwave-Radiation-Biological-Effects%20Rome%20Labs.pdf

  4. #4 by Anonymous on January 8, 2015 - 5:00 pm

    https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2015/01/08/wall-streets-cell-phone-litigation-problem/

    Wall Street’s Cell Phone Litigation Problem

    Gordon Noble, Finance and Investment for Good, Nov 14, 2014
    It is 1987 and Gordon Gekko stands on a windswept beach with a cell phone to his ear. He is talking on the world’s first mobile phone – the Motorola DynaTac 8000X. It wasn’t cheap back then costing $3,995 – which in today’s terms is close to $9,000. Not surprising only the wealthiest could afford these phones, and Wall Street was the epicentre of an industry that became a global phenomenon over the next decades.

    Wall Street execs were the first to use cell phones. They have used them the longest and the most intensively. They were the first to upgrade to more powerful units. It is perhaps not surprising therefore that it is Wall Street firms that are the ‘canary in the mine’ in terms of litigation around the health impacts of long term cell phone use.

    The links between brain tumours and cell phones are hotly contested. As telcos fight a growing public relations battle that is flaring through social media, a little known legal case has continued to make its way through US courts.

    On 8th August 2014 Judge Frederick H. Weisberg issued a judgement in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia in a long running case alleging that brain tumours of the litigants were caused by cell phone use.

    Weisberg did not make a judgement on whether cell phones cause cancer. What he was examining is whether the evidence that was being presented by trial lawyers was permissible under the Court’s rules. To do this he went through an exhaustive process under the Dyas/Frye test which is essentially about whether an expert uses a methodology that is generally accepted in the relevant scientific community to arrive at his opinion.

    Weisberg ruled that a number of expert witnesses were permitted to present evidence in the next stage of the trial. But he also made some thought provoking comments:

    “If there is even a reasonable possibility that cell phone radiation is carcinogenic, the time for action in the public health and regulatory sectors is upon us. Even though the financial and social cost of restricting such devices would be significant, those costs pale in comparison to the cost in human lives from doing nothing, only to discover thirty or forty years from now that the early signs were pointing in the right direction. If the probability of carcinogenicity is low, but the magnitude of the potential harm is high, good public policy dictates that the risk should not be ignored.”

    The significance of Weisberg’s judgement is that he has inadvertently provided an independent verification of research. The research that he has admitted to the next stage of the court process will no doubt be challenged, but the methodology that the researchers have used has been accepted by the Court.

    One of the problems that medical researchers in the radiation field have found is that their work is criticised by parties with strong commercial self interests. Weisberg has no such pressures. He is simply a judge doing his job.

    The question for investors is what does this all mean?

    In the heated discussion about whether cell phones can cause cancer it will be litigation that will ultimately determine the issue. The insurance industry understands this.

    In 2010 Lloyds of London produced a paper, Electro-magnetic fields from mobile phones: recent developments, which discussed the potential for litigation. Lloyds stated:

    “If EMF is proved to cause an increased risk of brain cancer it is likely the insurance industry will see claims under product liability policies for bodily injury….The issue of asbestos and its implications is widely known throughout the insurance industry, and many comparisons can be drawn with EMF – the initial impression that it was a ‘wonder product’ coupled with potential very long-term serious health issues not understood at the start of its use. Like asbestos any EMF litigation will probably be long and complex – similar issues could occur such as the definition of an actionable injury, policy triggers and apportioning liability….Should EMF prove to cause brain cancer, or any other adverse health effects, it is likely the main effect on the insurance industry will concern product liability claims for bodily injury.”

    Lloyds concluded their report stating “With regards to the implication to insurance, as the current scientific evidence stands, it is unlikely that insurers will be liable for compensation for bodily injury on product liability policies. However, as asbestos has shown, new scientific developments coupled with a small number of key legal cases can change the situation very rapidly.”

    Insurers have already taken Lloyds’ advice to heart by excluding coverage of radiation risks from insurance contracts.

    In the meantime the debate will continue. New evidence is coming out on a regular basis demonstrating the links between cell phone use and cancer. A recent French study for example that came out in May 2014 (see links) found a positive association that was statistically significant for heavy users of cell phones considering life-long cumulative duration.

    Whilst the telco industry may fight to the wall on litigation it may be employers that will ultimately bear the brunt of litigation claims.

    A significant question for Wall Street firms is how they will manage this risk. Currently Wall Street firms supply and pay cell phone bills for their employees. Work is structured in such a way that it is impossible for an employee to work without a phone.

    If a court determines that there is a link between cell phones and cancer we can expect that, because Wall Street has the greatest exposure, it will be first to be hit. Compensation, which would most likely be based on lost earnings, would be significant for an industry that routinely pays out multi-million dollar bonuses.

    The question is whether Wall Street is already experiencing claims? There have been high profile Wall Street executives that have passed away in recent years from aggressive brain cancers. Wall Street firms are unlikely to want to proactively disclose litigation but it is a question that should be asked.

    Wall Street firms also have some tough decisions to make about managing future risk. If we were to see a change of behaviour in the way firms manage their employees’ cell phones then this may be an indication that they are aware of the problem. At least one Wall Street firm has recently moved to no longer paying cell phone bills for its employees. Employees that have been spoken to believe that this is part of a cost cutting exercise, but wider factors may be at play.

    What would Gordon Gekko be doing in these circumstances? The way he was smoking those cigars he may not have made it this far to worry about it. But if he did he would no doubt be shorting his own company.

    Links:

    Dariusz Leszczynski – molecular biology scientist who has advised The World Health Organisation. Dariusz is currently visiting Australia giving public lectures. See his blog for details: https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/

    Reuters: Are wireless phones linked with brain cancer risk?
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/11/us-brain-cancer-mobilephone-idUSKCN0IV26Y20141111

    Transcript of Judge Frederick H. Weisberg judgement on expert witness in telco / brain tumour case:
    http://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Expert-Order.pdf

    Gordon Gekko’s cell phone
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2010/09/23/gordon_gekko_s_cell_phone.html

    Gaëlle Coureau, et al., Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study,Occupational & Envtl. Med., May 9, 2014 (available at http://oem.bmj.com/content/early/2014/05/09/oemed-2013-101754.abstract

  5. #5 by Anonymous on January 8, 2015 - 9:16 pm

    I saw Dr. Roman Schulze’s picture in this. This is just awful.

    Look what his wife is advocating for-this is off of Jan Flory’s Facebook-here is the link- https://www.facebook.com/jan.flory.1?fref=ts&ref=br_tf

    Michele Garden ‎Jan Flory
    September 23, 2014 · Fullerton, CA ·
    Hi Jan,
    As your friendly neighborhood atheist, I was wondering when the City Council started having prayers before city council meetings. I’m wondering why we need to have this. Being a staunch backer of the whole separation of church and state thing, I would like to see no religious trappings at the civic functions such as city council meetings. Meeting agendas and minutes do not reflect this part of the meetings. Any insight into this? Thank so much for all that you do for our city!

    These people are disgusting! He is pushing to irradiate the kids and she wants to kick God out of the council meetings!

    • #6 by RP on January 9, 2015 - 9:50 am

      These individuals are totally irrelevant at this point with the exception of both the personal and professional liability exposure Dr. Roman Schulze has created for himself. He has acted in a professional capacity, as a medical doctor, holding himself out as an expert, promoting the deployment of these dangerous wireless systems in various school districts with false assurances of safety. His comments on this blog spanning almost a year really add to the pile. He is a very foolish man.

      • #7 by Anonymous on January 11, 2015 - 11:43 am

        He is no different than any of the FSD employees or Trustees. They have all exposed themselves.

  6. #8 by Joe Imbriano on January 11, 2015 - 12:06 pm

    • #9 by Anonymous on January 16, 2015 - 6:22 am

      Fullerton is the worst because they have ignored you for so long Joe. They have blood on their hands on this one.

  7. #10 by facts on January 28, 2015 - 9:43 pm

    Risk for Glioma Triples With Long-Term Cell Phone Use

    Pauline Anderson, Medscape Public Health and Prevention, Jan 14, 2015
    CME/CE credit available

    Clinical Context
    During the last decade, there has been a dramatic global increase in wireless communication use, resulting in greater exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Health risk concerns center on the brain, which is the main target of RF-EMF during use of mobile or cordless phones.

    Some evidence suggests the possibility of increased brain tumor risk associated with use of wireless phones, but findings to date have been mixed and inconclusive. The International Agency on Research on Cancer (IARC) at the World Health Organization concluded that RF-EMF exposure is “possibly” a human carcinogen.

    Study Synopsis and Perspective
    Long-term use of both mobile and cordless phones is associated with an increased risk for glioma, the most common type of brain tumor, the latest research on the topic concludes.

    The new study shows that the risk for glioma was tripled among those using a wireless phone for more than 25 years and that the risk was also greater for those who had started using mobile or cordless phones before age 20 years.

    “Doctors should be very concerned by this and discuss precautions with their patients,” study author Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, professor, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden, told Medscape Medical News.

    Such precautions, he said, include using hands-free phones with the “loud speaker” feature and text messaging instead of phoning.

    The study was published online October 28 in Pathophysiology.

    Pooled Data

    The recent worldwide increase in use of wireless communications has resulted in greater exposure to RF-EMF. The brain is the main target of RF-EMF when these phones are used, with the highest exposure being on the same side of the brain where the phone is placed.

    The new study pooled data from 2 case-control studies on histopathologically confirmed malignant brain tumors. The first included patients 20 to 80 years old diagnosed from 1997 to 2003, and the second included those 18 to 75 years old diagnosed between 2007 and 2009. Patients came from 6 oncology centers in Sweden.

    Patients were matched with control participants of the same gender and approximate age who were randomly drawn from the Swedish Population Registry.

    All participants filled out a questionnaire detailing exposure to mobile phones and cordless desktop phones.

    The analysis included 1498 cases of patients with malignant brain tumors; the mean age was 52 years. Most patients (92%) had a diagnosis of glioma, and just more than half of the gliomas (50.3%) were the most malignant variety — astrocytoma grade 4 (glioblastoma multiforme). Also included were 3530 control participants, with a mean age of 54 years.

    The analysis showed an increased risk for glioma associated with use for more than 1 year of both mobile and cordless phones after adjustment for age at diagnosis, gender, socioeconomic index, and year of diagnosis. The highest risk was for those with the longest latency for mobile phone use at 25 years.

    Table. Glioma Risk With Mobile and Cordless Phone Use

    Phone Use Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
    Mobile phone use > 1 year 1.3 (1.1 – 1.6)
    Cordless phone use > 1 year 1.4 (1.1 – 1.7)
    Mobile phone use > 25 years 3.0 (1.7 – 5.2)
    The risk was increased the more that wireless phones were used. The odds ratios (ORs) steadily increased with increasing hours of use.

    The risk for glioma was greatest in the most exposed part of the brain. The ORs were higher for ipsilateral exposure and for glioma in the temporal and overlapping lobes.

    Furthermore, the risk was highest among participants who first used a mobile phone (OR, 1.8) or cordless phone (OR, 2.3) before age 20 years, although the number of patients and control participants was relatively small.

    Developing Brain

    As Dr Hardell explained, children and adolescents are more exposed to RF-EMF than adults because of their thinner skull bone and smaller head and the higher conductivity in their brain tissue. The brain is still developing up to approximately age 20 years, and until that time, it is relatively vulnerable, he said.

    There was a higher risk for third-generation (3G) mobile phone use compared with other types, but this was based on short latency and rather low numbers of exposed participants, said the authors. 3G universal global telecommunications system mobile phones emit wide-band microwave signals, which “hypothetically” may result in higher biological effects compared with other signals, they write.

    Such biological effects, said Dr Hardell, could include an increase in reactive oxygen species, which several articles have linked to cancer. The p53 gene has also been implicated, he said.

    The study’s very high participation rate (86% for patients and 87% for control participants) makes it unlikely that selection bias influenced the results, said the authors.

    Dr Hardell believes the new findings reinforce the message that EF-EMF emissions from wireless phones should be regarded as carcinogenic under IARC classifications and that current guidelines for exposure “should be urgently revised” to reflect that.

    According to the IARC’s 2013 report, there is a “causal” relationship between use of both mobile and cordless phones and that the risk for glioma is “possible.”

    Numerous studies have looked at the link between use of wireless phones and brain tumors. Studies by Dr Hardell and his colleagues dating back to the late 1990s have found a connection with mobile and cordless phones.

    However, the INTERPHONE study (Int J Epidemiol 2011;39:675-694; Cancer Epidemiol 2011;32:453-464) failed to find strong evidence that mobile phones increase the risk for brain tumors.

    In addition, a large prospective study (Int J Epidemiol 2013;42:792-802) found that mobile phone use was not associated with increased incidences of glioma, meningioma, or noncentral nervous system cancers in middle-aged British women.

    According to Dr Hardell, this last study was limited because it used information at one point in time. “It is not a case-control study and has serious problems with the methods used,” he told Medscape Medical News.

    Evidence “Unconvincing”

    Reached for a comment, L. Dade Lunsford, MD, Lars Leksell Professor of Neurosurgery, and director, Center for Image Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, said that the new study provides additional “but as yet unconvincing” evidence of a potential role of cell or cordless phone technologies in the pathogenesis of gliomas.

    He noted that some features were not controlled for, including ionizing radiation exposure and family history.

    As well, he said, the study has recall bias, with results possibly being affected by patients being anxious to solve the question of “why me?”

    “It is of interest that the only study that used actual industry data of cell phone use (the Danish study [Lancet Oncol 2011;12:624-626; Rev Environment Health 2012;27:51-58]) was dismissed by the authors as ‘uninformative’,” he said. “Perhaps it was not supportive of the author’s premise.”

    Although the study did not specify the side of the tumor, Dr Lunsford pointed out that roughly 90% of the world’s population is right-handed and that most hold their mobile phone to their left ear in order to write with their dominant hand. “One could theorize then that left-sided tumors would predominate with the temporal lobe being most adjacent to the cell phone output.”

    Dr Lunsford also commented that both glial and Schwann cells are late-responding tissues and that the oncogenesis of such cells by mobile phone technologies remains unexplained. “If cell phones cause such tumors, why do patients not develop higher rates of ipsilateral basal or squamous cell cancers, or melanomas — these are frequently dividing cell lines that theoretically ought to be even more susceptible.”

    Although the potential role of cell phones as an additional factor in oncogenesis “can’t be dismissed out of hand,” the use of this technology does save lives, stressed Dr Lunsford.

    “Cell phone has provided an amazing safety net for citizens of almost all cultures across the world. The lives saved by the proliferation of cell phone communication [are] phenomenal — emergency calls, quick first responders, warnings of severe weather are only a few examples.”

    Pathophysiology. Published online October 28, 2014. Abstract

    Study Highlights
    The investigators pooled data from 2 case-control studies of malignant brain tumors from patients diagnosed in Sweden during 1997 to 2003 (diagnosis at ages 20 – 80 years) and 2007 to 2009 (ages 18 – 75 years).
    The investigators included only cases in which the tumor was confirmed by histopathologic examination.
    Population-based control participants were matched for age and gender.
    Questionnaires allowed determination of exposures to cell and cordless phone use.
    Unconditional regression analysis used the entire reference group, with adjustment for gender, age, year of diagnosis, and socioeconomic index.
    Response rates were 89% for patients (n = 1498) and 87% for control participants (n = 3530).
    Among the patients, 92% had glioma, of which 50.3% of these tumors were highly malignant glioblastoma multiforme (astrocytoma grade 4).
    Overall, mobile phone use was associated with a 30% increased risk for glioma (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 – 1.6).
    For mobile phone use in the latency group of more than 25 years, the risk for glioma was tripled that in the control participants (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.7 – 5.2).
    Use of cordless phones was associated with an overall 40% increased risk for glioma (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 – 1.7), with risk increased further to 70% in the latency group of 15 to 20 years (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 – 2.5).
    There were statistically significant increases in OR both per 100 hours of cumulative use, and per year of latency for mobile and cordless phone use.
    The risk was greatest for ipsilateral glioma (OR, 1.8 for mobile phone use; 95% CI, 1.4 – 2.2 and OR, 1.7 for cordless phone use; 95% CI, 1.3 – 2.1).
    In terms of location, the risk was greatest for glioma in the temporal and overlapping lobes, corresponding to the region of highest RF-EMF exposure.
    Beginning mobile or cordless phone use before age 20 years was associated with a higher risk for glioma compared with mobile or cordless phone use beginning at later ages.
    Although glioma risk was higher with use of 3G mobile phones, this was based on short latency and a small sample of exposed cases.
    Limitations of this study include possible recall bias or observational bias and relatively small numbers of patients and control participants in certain subgroups.
    Possible precautions to limit RF-EMF exposure during mobile or cordless phone use include using hands-free phones with a loud speaker and text messaging instead of telephoning.
    Clinical Implications
    The risk for glioma is increased with cell and cordless phone use, based on an analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden.
    The risk associated with cell and cordless phone use is especially increased for ipsilateral glioma of the temporal and overlapping lobes, particularly for longer exposure starting at younger ages.
    http://bit.ly/1CNAJ00

  8. #11 by Dr. Lenny Brewster on June 21, 2015 - 7:21 am

    It’s all about Money and Population Control.
    Profit Over People.
    Big business rakes in mucho-bucks selling wireless tech. Wireless tech irradiates everyone resulting in cancer, Alzheimer’s etc. Big Pharma and the medical complex rakes in mucho-bucks treating this plague. Reproductive genes are further destroyed, gradually reducing the future population.
    Win-Win Situation.
    Almost as if it were planned this way.
    It’s only going to get Worse as everyone wants things to go Faster with Greater Resolution and i-Whatevers and Smart-whatevers Everywhere. Smart toothbrushes, Smart toilets, Smart condoms…

  9. #12 by Xy on February 11, 2017 - 12:47 am

    Focus on promoting the many natural antidotes there are to this government eugenics program.
    First of all go to chilel.com
    There are easy healing meditations there which actually teach you how to use your mind to shield your body from conflicting frequencies and to override them.
    Yes, it sound woo woo, an foreign, but if used every single day it works.

    People tend to shut down when the only the news offered makes them feel impotent, and fearful, when there is no balance, only worse and worse news, when there are no answers and when no antidotes are mentiokned that can be used to counteract all that evil. It is just venting if no solutions are offered.

    Shielding – uncoated aluminium insect screening to faraday cage your meter, windows, even outside walls.

    – YShield paint on outside of home, considerably more costly, yes.

    – Sine Tamer It is is an industrial grade 20 yr warranty sine wave tracking frequency attenuation device which an electrician installs in your service panel/circuit box, use it to neutralize the frequencies coupling to the transmission lines and using them as a conduit to enter the hose and travel around the wiring in your home.
    sinetamer.com (in the US)
    In Canada, contact rep Terry Stotyn

    – Shut off all bedroom circuits, install kill switches for any room not in use, and never sleep in an energized room, since all wireless microwaves couple to energized lines first and foremost.

    – Use only a hard wired landline and hard wired modem, no portable phones. Use no wireless whatsoever in the home at all. GEt your kids to digitally detox. Get them to watch a short video, “Look Up” by Gary Turk on youtube

    – Sleep on correctly designed magnetic sleep pads for chronic illness, and drink half your weight in ozs of clean, pureified water each day. Weigh 100 lbs, drink 50 ozs.
    Sleep Pad can be inquired about or researched at:
    magneticosleep.com
    Pads are designed by a dentist who got mercury poisoning, These pads, especially the one for chronic sufferers, are able to help almost anyone to recover and regain deep reparative sleep. They, like the insoles, require the user to drink enough water to make them work effectively.

    – Track down any leftover on line stock for E3 magnetic insoles. They are totally different than most junk out htere, they were designed by a physicist who worked closely with Curtis Bennett and collaborated an enlightened medical team for whom Curtis is adjunct faculty.

    – Consider moderate careful protective use of spirulina, chlorella, People less than a mile from Hiroshima survived and did not get cancer when they did this and stopped eating all sugar

    – Use a judicious daily dose of very high quality aloe vera to counteract and prevent cancer.

    Yours truly,
    Xy
    One more self cured stage 3 “terminal” cancer conqueror

    • #13 by Joe Imbriano on February 16, 2017 - 7:45 am

      I agree. I think it is too late though. These kids have had at least 10+ years of exposure. That generation and all successive generations have been wiped out.

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!