Who checks this stuff over there? Is Cheney spending too much time under the WiFi access points sucking down aspartame?


Any graph, in order to be relevant, has to have the proper scale for starters. What are they teaching these children in math class over there? DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT A DECIMAL POINT IS OR WHAT A ZERO MEANS?


“The district should be especially worried because the Huntington Beach Union High School District (HBUHSD) and other districts provide a salary schedule nine percent higher than that of the FJUHSD. If unfair compensation continues, teachers may leave.”


I thought I heard some of these pinkos in the red shirts blasting the board about how they cannot afford to live in Fullerton because they don’t make enough money?

AND THEN THERE IS THIS gem from the offspring of one of Fullerton’s chief irradiators Anne Sinek.

IT’S OUR TURN: “I am a product of excellent teaching. Teachers have poured countless hours into making me who I am and now I intend to repay them. I am a Student for Teachers!” —Brooke Sinek, senior

WHILE HER MOTHER PUSHES FORCED IRRADIATION for all Fullerton school children

image001-22-300x174 (1)


Talk about turning your backs on the children, you guys (or should I say gals) have it down to a science and shame on you.

Experts warn of radiation risks to children as ALL FULLERTON SCHOOL OFFICIALS IGNORE THEM

More to come for sure ladies and gentlemen and as the magnet of Troy weakens and the district puts its hooks out to the south for more lucrative student arrangements. Oh yeah, and the surplus? You really think it’s there do you? As these selfish teachers are silent when it comes to student safety as they ignore the dangers of the districts technology plan for the better part of the past three years and get all hot and bothered over a few bucks. Oh yeah they will enlist the students when it comes to lining their pockets but when it comes to protecting the students, they scatter like rats in a dark room when the lights come on.

You are all about to become the latest victims of the forced irradiation program that will result in cancer and sterilization



with the high powered wireless systems coming to Troy that no one wants to face, that the Oracle promotes while hiding the dangers, that the technology director who hosted an event at his home promoting wireless in the schools Jesse Knowles, wants to hurry up and ram through while we at The Fullerton Informer are doing everything in our power to stop as they all tell you there is nothing to see here and to move along.


acacia-2 (1)

We will do no such thing because we know this stuff is dangerous.



hopefully you will wake up to the fact that you are being had by those that you trust WHO ARE are equally as dangerous. The only thing worse than the teachers maneuvering the unsuspecting students to get what they don’t need but want, is for the teachers to turn their backs on the children just as soon as they do just like they have done for the last three years.











  1. #1 by wireless radiation -- get a clue Troy!!! on March 29, 2016 - 10:33 am

    Dangers of the wireless cell phone, WiFi and EMF age

    World-renowned Epidemiologist Dr. George Carlo provided a high impact presentation that exposed the dangers of living in the wireless age in a way that everyone could understand. As the chief scientist of the world’s largest research effort into wireless safety, the Safe Wireless Initiative (SWI), he discussed the effects of electromagnetic radiation, specifically Information Carrying Radio Waves (IRCWs) and how they negatively affect the body’s ability to function and repair damage affecting our cells. This is great information about how emf effects our health.

  2. #2 by Anonymous on March 29, 2016 - 12:37 pm

    If wireless radiation was so dangerous, why can I cook food with my microwave but not with my wireless router? If wireless radiation was so dangerous, why are we not getting rid of the sun for sending such dangerous UV radiation down on me and my peers? Instead of fighting against schools having wireless routers, shouldn’t you be fighting to build a giant wall in the sky to block the sun and protect students everywhere?

    • #3 by Joe Imbriano on March 29, 2016 - 12:52 pm

      Natural background levels of UV and sunlight are essential for survival. Microwave emissions coming off of a router are trillions of times background levels. I suggest you do your homework before making such foolish assertions. Hundreds of scientists could not be wrong. Your teachers are foolish myopic creatures that have turned their backs on all of you. Stick your hand over the laser and the checkout stand, now try sticking your eye over it. Lasers affect tissues that are optically sensitive. There are tissues that are are sensitive to non thermal effects of microwave radiation such as your brain, heart and reproductive organs.

      • #4 by Anonymous on March 30, 2016 - 9:16 am

        “Hundreds of scientists could not be wrong.”

        If only you applied this logic outside your preconceived ideas.

    • #5 by Information carrying radio waves on March 29, 2016 - 5:43 pm

      You are very arrogant and ignorant. Do yourself a favor and drop the arrogance so that your health and future is not destroyed from these exposures.

  3. #6 by Reality Is..... on March 29, 2016 - 11:29 pm

    I learn one thing from reading your posts about Wifi, cell phones, routers, cell towers, computers, etc. We are all going to die soon. Very soon. By reading this I might as well plan my funeral and my children’s funerals like next week. Crazy how your brain operates at times. Almost like a nuclear bomb is going to be dropped soon and we are all going to just disappear any day now. Do you by chance smoke weed?

    • #7 by Anonymous on April 1, 2016 - 5:01 pm

      The only thing smokin’ at Joe’s house is his wife. You wish you had somadat.

    • #8 by Anonymous on April 2, 2016 - 4:15 pm

      I am very saddened to learn that Reality Is has offspring. I sincerely hope that they all take after their mother.

  4. #9 by Anonymous on March 31, 2016 - 3:42 pm

    It is amazing that the studies and research have been done and we have a concerned person trying to educate us and bring awareness to this and you want to insult them. Grow up and educate yourself.

    • #10 by Anonymous on March 31, 2016 - 9:04 pm

      It’s amazing that anyone buys into this crap! Educate yourself, indeed!

      • #11 by Anonymous on April 1, 2016 - 10:20 am

        You are a fool to think this is crap. You’re just too proud to do your own research. I bet deep down you know it’s bad, but you don’t want to believe it. Keep denying yourself.

        • #12 by Anonymous on April 2, 2016 - 11:21 am

          It’s possible I HAVE done my own research, and that might be why I think Joe’s position is stupid.

          • #13 by Joe Imbriano on April 2, 2016 - 12:03 pm

            You mean you have ignored the hundreds of scientists and you are stating that their positions are stupid. These are not my assertions.

            • #14 by Anonymous on April 2, 2016 - 2:14 pm

              Nope, not ignored. Just read them with a critical eye, like I do other types of research, and found the conclusions you drew from them baseless.

              • #15 by Joe Imbriano on April 2, 2016 - 2:31 pm

                A critical eye cannot discount the work and conclusions of the scientists. Nice try.

                • #16 by Anonymous on April 2, 2016 - 7:38 pm

                  A critical eye that’s not attached to a paranoid brain sure doesn’t have any problems with it.

                  • #17 by Joe Imbriano on April 2, 2016 - 8:10 pm

                    And the hundreds of scientists that warn against the very things you are defending possess just that. Nice try. It is not about me or what you perceive as paranoia. You are just using typical smear tactics to defend what is indefensible. It will never work because the truth stands.

              • #18 by Anonymous on April 4, 2016 - 11:31 am

                You must work for the school district to come to that conclusion. Then again, you may be one of the brainwashed Troy Oracle writers or editor.

                • #19 by Anonymous on April 4, 2016 - 2:28 pm

                  Nah, I’m just not a crackpot that finds a conspiracy theory under every rock.

          • #20 by Anonymous on April 2, 2016 - 7:52 pm

            Are you an example of one who can think critically? If so, that is very bad news.

            • #21 by Anonymous on April 3, 2016 - 8:54 am

              No, Joe is obviously not.

      • #22 by Face facts on April 2, 2016 - 8:27 am

        Ignoring this won’t make it go away.
        Focussing on the messenger will not make this disappear.

        This is the reality.

  5. #23 by Anonymous on April 1, 2016 - 10:22 am

    Mr. Imbriano, thank you for your work. This issue is being raised right now in our school district in Manitoba and your information has provided the impetus for alarming many parents.

  6. #24 by Annoyed on April 4, 2016 - 8:30 pm

    The problem with the fool running the website is that he takes a nugget of truth and creates a mountain of lies. Anyone that went to the PTSA meetings would know that the district and the school have been getting requests for WiFi at Troy by numerous parents (who clearly do not agree with your position on WiFi).

    The only connection to any of this by the PTSA is that they were provided a request for specific computers (chromebooks) by the school, and the PTSA merely donated the requested funds… For this you turn PTSA members into dastardly villains out to kill the students at Troy. Your delusional.

    Your continued attacks on the PTSA and assertions that they are somehow forcing IRRADIATION on the kids is ridiculous. Attacking Mrs. Sinek as “chief irradiator” is silly, and now attacking her daughter is just further example of your disgusting lack of moral character (and maybe lack of sanity).

    • #25 by Joe Imbriano on April 4, 2016 - 9:31 pm

      The joke’s on the children and the real fools are the ones like yourself who are ignoring the hundreds of scientists and the thousands of studies. Every descriptive and derogatory implication stated in the aforementioned aimed at me directly applies to everyone involved in the forced irradiation of the students period.

      Calling me names may get you off but the facts are facts. The students are in harms way. You have already seen what wireless has done to one of your own warriors.

      • #26 by Anon on April 6, 2016 - 9:50 am

        Are you referring to the teacher with the brain tumor?

      • #27 by Anonymous on April 6, 2016 - 4:30 pm

        Nah, the joke is you.

        Hopefully you’re not on the children, so the joke is not on them and they’re not in harm’s way.

        • #28 by creepy on April 6, 2016 - 6:38 pm

          you are one creepy person

          • #29 by Anonymous on April 6, 2016 - 7:04 pm

            Hey, I’m not the one obsessed with children’s’ reproductive organs.

            • #30 by Joe Imbriano on April 6, 2016 - 8:42 pm

              Apple computer company sure is.

              • #31 by Anonymous on April 6, 2016 - 10:48 pm

                Because that makes sense to absolutely no one that is sane.

                • #32 by 33 degrees of separation on April 6, 2016 - 11:27 pm

                  The entire realm of our contemporary understanding is delegated and based on a constant and controlled series of lies. The titans of industry work behind the scenes to advance agendas wholly inconsistent with those of the average individual. Sigil and Masonic symbols dot the landscape of Madison avenue, the drawing boards of boardrooms, and constantly flicker across the screens we and our children aimlessly gaze into around the clocks of our meager, controlled existence.

                  The idea that corporations have a constant reliance on profit is an assumption solely based on the idea that current events and history will and have run on a linear scale. The candles will be blown out on the cake and there will be no need for people barring a small servicing cadre for the elite.

                  What Mr. Imbriano has uncovered is nothing more than a key component and a secret of the modern age which is really cloaked in luciferianly themed music, design and worship all around us. The agenda to depopulate the earth is upon us, and for the most part, has been so for the last 50 years. The wireless agenda, as Mr. Imbriano so cleverly alludes to, is the golden capstone of their pyramid. It too can be thwarted and stolen from them like the last one.

                  • #33 by Anonymous on April 7, 2016 - 8:29 am

                    Sure. Because that makes sense, and you’re not completely off the rails.

                    • #34 by it's time . . . on April 7, 2016 - 11:29 am

                      . . . to go find that pile of sand that is missing your head.

      • #35 by Reality Is..... on April 8, 2016 - 4:27 pm

        I had a radar gun in my crotch for 10 years and I’ve had a cell phone in my crotch and face for 15 years now. I made a baby just fine 3 years ago and have been completely healthy. Are you predicting the demise of my cum load and my brain cell soon?

        • #36 by Anonymous on April 12, 2016 - 2:51 pm

          LOL! You’ve got to be joking??!! You really think you can fool everyone, don’t ya? A 3 yr old? Yeah, right! Then I guess you never spend time with your kid since you’re on this website all day and night. So you do admit you are a cop. Yeah, you’re probably a retired cop with grown kids.

          • #37 by Anonymous on April 12, 2016 - 8:06 pm

            He probably spends more time with his kids than Joe, because he’s not busy wasting his time being ignored by city councils and school boards every week while squeezing in a few articles about how the earth is flat.

          • #38 by Reality Is..... on April 13, 2016 - 9:22 am

            On here 24/7? Really? How could anyone be on here 24/7? There’s barely any comments on here at all to respond too. I get on here every few days and there still isn’t much of substance to respond to. Yes, a 3 year old.



            • #39 by Anonymous on April 13, 2016 - 10:14 am

              Every few days???!!! You mean every hour!
              A 3 year old, huh? Yeah, whatever you say, DannyBoy. We believe everything you say. LOL!

              • #40 by Reality Is..... on April 14, 2016 - 8:32 am

                Whatever you say Barry. You and Joe know everything. Every hour, every minute. All fine with me. If there was more than you guys circle jerking each other on here, maybe it would be every minute if there was good current substance to debate.

                • #41 by Anonymous on April 14, 2016 - 1:53 pm

                  As “all is fine”, perhaps it is time for you to depart.

        • #42 by Anon on April 13, 2016 - 9:36 pm

          “Evidence of brain cancer from occupational exposure to pulsed microwaves from a police radar.”
          Dr. Neil Cherry

          Since the first evidence that RF radiation damages chromosomes in 1959, many independent studies have identified broken DNA stands, chromosome aberrations and altered gene expression in animal cells, human cells and in living animals and humans from EMR exposure. This confirms that RF/MW radiation is genotoxic with a safe exposure level of zero. Scores of epidemiological studies show that EMR increases brain tumors, including 16 studies with dose-response relationships and at least six specifically identifying astrocytomas. Exposure to RF/MW is consistently associated with headaches, fatigue, loss of concentration and memory loss. These symptoms have been called “The Radiofrequency Sickness Syndrome” or “Microwave Syndrome”. These symptoms are now shown with cell phone use in a significant dose-response manner. Cellphone use has also been associated with increases brain tumor in 4 studies and eye cancer in one study. Police traffic radar is also shown to be genotoxic through studies associating it with increases testicular cancer. This is a consistent and coherent set of studies confirming that microwaves, radar and police radar is genotoxic and when exposing an officer’s head over many months, will produce a significantly increased risk of producing an Astrocytoma brain tumor. All of these effects occur for exposures well within existing standards. The standards are based on tissue heating and ignore the evidence of genotoxicity, cancer and neurological effects.

          • #43 by Reality Is..... on April 14, 2016 - 8:34 am

            So everyone is going to die soon. But since cell phones because so popular, aren’t people actually living longer now? Or is that due to the drugs everyone is taking? Oh well. Life is short. Who really wants to live until 90 anyways?

    • #44 by Ray on April 5, 2016 - 5:28 am

      I am aware of a wide variety of requests that school districts receive from parents and students alike. Does that mean the district officials yield to the whim of a select group of parents? Obviously not.

      Parental demands for increased technology are to be expected. What is not to be expected of district staff is to ignore safety warnings that come directly from concerned parents backed by scientific experts in their respective fields.

      While we are on the subject, you made specific reference to an attack on a student. In the context of the article and comments, please share with the readers here where this so called attack on the daughter of Ms. Sinek can be found? Inquiring minds want to know.

      Where is the statement referring to the “killing” students at Troy? The authorities want to know.

      Finally, I am just curious as to who made you the district’s judge and psychologist?

    • #45 by Anonymous on April 5, 2016 - 11:44 am

      You need to stop attacking Joe, the messenger, and look at the irrefutable messages, that is, if you cared about the health and well being of the students and teachers. Why is the PTSA not looking at the information? They have been provided more than enough. Why is the PTSA not standing up for the kids and teachers? They are ignoring the science and the information. They are not disclosing it to the school parents, but keeping a lid on it. So far, they are responsible for irradiating those classrooms with Chromebooks and ignoring any information that is contrary to what they want to do. Do the ‘numerous parents’ that clamour for microwave radiation in the school even know it is a health hazard??

      This is not Joe’s position on WiFi and your attempt to paint is such is a desperate attempt to defend the indefensible — the irradiation of Troy students and teachers.

      Since you appear to be defender of Mrs. Sinek, is she what is important here? I understand she is the Harvard interviewer. By defending the irradiation of a couple of thousand students, does this bring your child in favor for a Harvard interview? I’m asking because rather than working to understand the information, you are taking the effort to disregard it and defend Mrs. Sinek.

      Countries are passing laws to ban WiFi from schools, reduce exposure; Murray v. Motorola $1.9B lawsuit claiming cell phone radiation caused a mans brain tumor, lawsuit at Fay School in MA alleging that Wi-Fi caused a student’s Electrohypersensitivity. It’s too late for the denial.

      If there exist any ‘disgusting lack of moral character’ it would be all of the PTSA, Troy administration, Troy TSO, and people such as YOURSELF that are turning their backs on the kids.

      You need to immediately do the right thing for the kids. Any school technology must be hard wired
      Fully disclose to students, parents, teachers the health hazards of wireless radiation.
      Be forthcoming with this information; otherwise, you are lying to everyone.

  7. #46 by Annoyed on April 4, 2016 - 11:05 pm

    The point is that you repeatedly and mistakenly attack the PTSA as villains. They simply got a request for funds from the school admin to pay for chromebooks, and gave the money as requested.

    The Troy PTSA is not a collection of evil people trying to irradiate the students to accomplish some sinister plot. This is a group of *volunteer* parents (mostly moms) doing their best to help, mostly coordinating volunteers and doing programs that benefit as many kids as possible.

    This situation is a perfect example of your distortions and misinformed attacks. It shows clearly how you take a nugget of trust to create a mountain of lies.

    • #47 by Joe Imbriano on April 4, 2016 - 11:09 pm

      Ignoring the facts are what everyone on the PTSA email list has done-

      • #48 by Anonymous on April 5, 2016 - 7:36 am

        No, they ignore what you think of as facts, but are far from them. You’re literally delusional.

        • #49 by Facts? on April 5, 2016 - 2:11 pm

          Read the PTSA email. The information is all from primary source documents: 220 International Scientists Appeal to U.N. and World Health Organization; the California Medical Association, etc.

          You have no basis for an argument unless you want to keep Joe the center of the matter. Is that what you want to do? Rather than stop this health hazard from coming into the school? Apparently, it is.

          You care nothing for the students and teachers health.

          • #50 by Joe Imbriano on April 5, 2016 - 3:00 pm

            Well stated. Making this about me is just a diversion and a cover for their cowardice and depraved defense of the indefensible.

          • #51 by Anonymous on April 5, 2016 - 5:09 pm

            It’s not a health hazard, and neither are vaccines. The only hazard is to people’s mental health when they try to parse your insanity. It’s like staring into the abyss of Chtulu’s maw.

  8. #52 by Annoyed on April 4, 2016 - 11:55 pm

    What is hilarious about your responses is that you cannot handle being called names, like you do to so many that you write about (including students). Then you cannot manage to respond to the merits of these responses, and rather just throw out some unthoughtful response that doesn’t at all address the point being presented.

    I write this for those that happen to read your site… as there is still hope for them.

    Is it you’re opinion that anyone that does not share your opinion that WiFi presents a health risk is evil?

    Is it possible that the PTSA members are not “ignoring facts”. Maybe they simply do not share your anti-WiFi position, and had no problem with providing the school the requested funds.

    It is *not* “fact”, it is a theory at this point, it is a possibility. It is the opinion of a few scientist that WiFi/cell may present a problem, but it is the opinion of many scientists that there is no harm. According to the World Health Organization ( “The levels of RF exposure from base stations and wireless networks are so low that the temperature increases are insignificant and do not affect human health.” and further “In fact, due to their lower frequency, at similar RF exposure levels, the body absorbs up to five times more of the signal from FM radio and television than from base stations.”
    There are plenty of articles and research that indicate the risks of WiFi to be minimal –

    You tend to have the position that disagreeing with you makes one ignorant, or evil or whatever. To me, this makes you close minded and foolish to think you have the only claim to “The Truth”. It is your opinion, not fact.
    I am at least open minded enough to consider that it is possible that WiFi/cell may cause harm… but it is my opinion that there is little risk if any. As more research is conducted we will eventually find out. In the meantime I am going to enjoy the benefits of WiFi and mobile phones, and hope the school continues to expand the use of these technologies to enable our students to be competitive in the global world they are going to live in.

    • #53 by Reality Is... on April 5, 2016 - 8:26 am

      Which is why they would make terrible council people. Biased opinions and close minds have no place in city government.

    • #54 by Anonymous on April 5, 2016 - 2:05 pm

      This is not Joe’s “opinion”.

      You are not well read on this subject or have chosen to ignore it. Your arguments are juvenile, at best. That is evident from your citations.

      Come back when you have done enough research to understand the matter. Until then, stop working to make mandatory exposure to microwave radiation, day-in and day out, a condition for our children to attend school. These are not all your children, are they? You have no rights over other people’s children, do you?

      “In the meantime I am going to enjoy the benefits of WiFi and mobile phones, and hope the school continues to expand the use of these technologies to enable our students to be competitive in the global world they are going to live in.”

      You are in denial, but that’s okay. Please go ahead and irradiate yourself. Have at it. Oh, and the words about “competitive . . . global world” has no basis and makes you sound like a mindless parrot. Are you a mindless parrot?

  9. #56 by How come this PTA gets it? on April 5, 2016 - 5:16 pm

    “Remove the Wi-Fi From Classrooms” States the Pheonecia PTA New York USA 27 October 2015

    ” ‘Dismantle the Wi-Fi in Classrooms’. The New York State Phoenicia PTA sent a letter to the Onteora School Board members stating:
    ‘The Phoenicia PTA has been presented on more than one occasion with information regarding the possible health implications of children’s daily exposure to WiFi in the classroom.
    The information that we have reviewed has raised parents’ concerns over it’s safety and we have decided to support the Board of Education in adopting the Precautionary Principle regarding the technology.
    It is our understanding that WiFi and all wireless devices emit non-thermal microwave radio frequency electromagnetic radiation, recently reclassified by the WHO/IARC as a Class 2B, possible human carcinogen. Parents are concerned that growing children will be most effected by possible disruptions to cell growth and brain function. There is concern over the possible effects on fertility, cardiac function and cancers.
    We understand that the BOE is currently discussing taking action on the issue.
    We support the BOE in dismantling the WiFi in the classrooms at Phoenicia school and in moving forward, to continue to update the safer hard-wired computer access to classrooms.’ “

  10. #57 by Reality Is... on April 5, 2016 - 9:28 pm

    Let’s just bring encyclopedias back to the classrooms. That should prepare the kids for the future just fine. 🙂

    • #58 by Fullerton Lover on April 6, 2016 - 9:40 am

      Sarcasm is the lowest form of witticism…

      • #59 by Anonymous on April 6, 2016 - 12:14 pm

        At least there is SOME wit, unlike the crap Joe posts.

        • #60 by Fullerton Lover on April 6, 2016 - 5:47 pm

          OK you win.

          I guess a half wit is better than no wit.

  11. #61 by Message to schools about wireless on April 8, 2016 - 7:36 am

  12. #62 by Former DARPA Senior Scientist on April 9, 2016 - 1:44 pm

    Senior DARPA Scientist Warns of Widespread LETHAL ATTACKS Upon the Public Coming From Microwave Towers

    Former DARPA Senior Scientist, Dr. Paul Batcho, asserts that cell phone towers pose an intentional and immediate lethal threat against the general public of the United States.
    Former DARPA Senior Scientist, Dr. Paul Batcho, asserts that cell phone towers pose an intentional and immediate lethal threat against the general public of the United States.

    It is an old issue, but with a new revelation by the most credible insider source to date. Recently, I was contacted by Dr. Paul Batcho. Batcho is a former DARPA senior scientist who worked at Los Alamos and held a top secret security clearance. In short, Batcho asserts that clandestine forces are purposely engaging in “acts of terrorism” against the general public through emission of dangerous frequencies from cell phone and microwave towers in the St. Petersburg/Orlando/ Tampa, Florida area.
    Before launching into a revelation of the stunning claims presented to me by Dr. Batcho, let’s establish his crediblity as a reliable witness.
    Dr. Paul Batcho’s Relevant Vitae

    Below is the publicly available professional background of Dr. Paul Batcho:
    Educational Background

    Princeton University

    Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Computational and Applied Mathematics 1987 – 1994

    Computational Physics and low dimensional modeling of dynamical systems; turbulence theory
    Revlevant Work Experience

    Staff Member Los Alamos National Laboratory

    October 2001 – August 2004 (2 years 11 months)Los Alamos, NM
    Computational Physics
    – C++ OOD design and software engineering development (agile, scrum)
    – advanced concurrent computing on thousands of processors, Linux/MS development
    – software quality assurance, CVS, unit testing and project management

    Research Associate

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute

    1999 – 2001 (2 years)
    Visiting member of Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, NYU; research position with Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    – Computational Physics for molecular biology, quantum chemistry, fluid dynamics
    Relevant Email Communications on the Terrorist Threat

    Please note the following email communications which were sent by Dr. Batcho to relevant American federal agencies with applicable oversight capabilities. apparently frustrated by the lack of response from thee oversight agencies, in whom the pubic safety is entrusted, I was copied on the last email and the previous emails were attached to provide contextual background. Here are the emails:
    Paul Batcho > April 8, 2016

    8:08 PM

    A​TTN: Telecommunication threat security office, Homeland Security
    I would like to bring to your attention an ongoing threat with regards to harmful communications transmitting from the cellular towers in central Florida, and Tampa St Petersburg. It is not clear to me whether it is due to the USCENTCOM in Tampa or it is targeting US civilians.
    I am a former scientist from Los Alamos National Lab in NM where I held a Q-Clearance for the DOE (top-secret DoD) for several years. I have also worked on DARPA research projects. I have a Ph.D. from Princeton and now live in St Petersburg and work… (Personal information deleted)…
    I seem to have stumbled across an advanced technology that I would classify as synthetic telepathy. It clearly uses the cellular towers to transmit illegal signals. It sounds unbelievable but it is actual technology being used on civilians of the US.
    My basic research does indicate that such technology can exist and dates back to the V2K (P300) mind wave technology of the 1970s. This does appear to be a much more advanced version that allows open communication of human mind to mind bridges.
    Please forward my email to the appropriate DoD security office and I would like the issue investigated. Human brains appear to transmit and receive at the RF bands around 450MHz and microwave transmissions can be highly damaging in turns of induced bio-effects. Please also forward my email to any CIA ​or US technology ​ team that may be researching similar technologies. It is very clear to me that such technologies exist.
    Please feel free to contact me, and I will be able to offer some background and technical information.
    Thank you
    Paul F Batcho, Ph.D.
    St Petersburg, FL 33701
    On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Paul Batcho wrote:
    A​TTN: Telecommunication security office, Homeland Security
    The Constitution Is Clear:Please find the follow-up to my communication on the transmission of illegal radio frequency signals from the cellular and micro towers in Tampa/St Petersburg, and its surrounding areas. My observations are based on clear scientific and engineering principles and data.
    I am a Ph.D. from Princeton University and a former scientist from Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico where I worked within nuclear weapon research teams. I held a Q clearance (top secret equivalent of DoD). I have also worked on DARPA research projects as a senior scientist.
    There is a technology transmitting RF signals and communications at the human brain resonant frequency bands, and it is targeting individuals and groups.
    These transmissions will cause harmful health affects in the form of enhanced microwave radiation illness. It is imperative that these frequency bands be measured and verified by an official source. These frequency bands do not exist naturally, and there is a technology targeting individuals.
    Cellular transmission’s broadcast at 853 MHz, human brain resonance is centered around 450Mhz, and Ham radio operators are not allowed to broadcast at the 400Mhz to 700Mhz band. I would suggest a filtering at the 400Mhz to 700Mhz band on all microwave and cellular transmissions, digital filters should suffice in the near term. Civilians are being harmed by the deliberate transmissions of an established technology.
    The verified measurement and existence of these RF band transmissions constitutes a terrorist act. Please advise the appropriate security office on Homeland security. This is a serious matter that needs immediate attention and it must be addressed. Please feel free to contact me.
    I would be happy the discuss it.Thank youPaul F. Batcho, Ph.D.
    St Petersburg, FL
    ATTN: DARPA Security & Intelligence
    Dears Sirs
    I would like to bring to your attention that a technology
    derived from the patents listed below is being used in
    an illegal manner over the cellular and microwave towers
    in St Petersburg/Tampa/Orlando FL.
    Please bring this matter to the attention of the security
    office and appropriate contract monitor for the technology
    mention within. The technology is clearly being used
    by a non US government group with lethal intentions
    on civilians.
    I forwarded previous emails on my understanding
    of the technology. I believe this matter needs serious
    and immediate attention.
    Paul F. Batcho, Ph.D.
    St Petersburg, FL 33701
    1992 and 1994 patents funded by DARPA,
    US Patent # 5,123,844. June 23rd, 1992
    US Patent # 5,289,438. February 22nd, 199
    On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Paul Batcho >wrote:
    Please be advised: threat in the St Petersburg/Tampa/Orlando Area
    This is follow-up to my previous emails on the illegal
    transmissions of signals from cellular and microwave
    transmission towers
    The technology being used is clearly based on the methods
    outlined in the following patents based on microwave
    transmission directed at human brain frequencies.
    The active technology has been in use for approximately
    3 1/2 years, roughly corresponding to the expiry of the
    1992 and 1994 patents funded by DARPA,
    US Patent # 5,123,844. June 23rd, 1992
    US Patent # 5,289,438. February 22nd, 199
    These systems stimulate the brain with RF frequencies and wave forms.This is not CDMA 450MHz:450MHz-470MHz transmissions.
    There is unlawful use of the various lethal aspects
    of the technology. The technology is active and civilians
    are being targeted with harmful health effects.
    Please investigate the transmission of the various frequency
    signals in the 450 MHz range. The band from 437MHz to 478Mhz
    with peaks at roughly 6 MHz intervals appear to have
    sizable spectral energy components.
    Please feel free to contact me.
    I would be happy the discuss it.
    Thank you
    Paul F. Batcho, Ph.D.
    St Petersburg, FL
    Is It Too Late?

    Dr. Batcho’s warnings are too late for many. Consider this excerpt from Global research.
    Cell Towers Radiating Our Children
    “The rollout of smart meters proceeds alongside increased installation of wireless technology and cell phone towers in and around schools in the US. In 2010 Professor Magda Havas conducted a study of schools in 50 US state capitols and Washington DC to determine students’ potential exposure to nearby cell towers. A total 6,140 schools serving 2.3 million students were surveyed using the database. Of these, 13% of the schools serving 299,000 students have a cell tower within a quarter mile of school grounds, and another 50% of the schools where 1,145,000 attend have a tower within a 0.6 mile radius. The installation of wireless networks and now smart meters on and around school properties further increases children’s RF exposure.

    Many school districts that are strapped for cash in the face of state budget cuts are willing to ignore the abundance of scientific research on RF dangers and sign on with telecom companies to situate cell towers directly on school premises. Again, the FCC’s thermal effect rule is invoked to justify tower placement together with a disregard of the available studies.

    The School District of Palm Beach County, the eleventh largest school district in the US, provides one such example. Ten of its campuses already have cell towers on their grounds while the district ponders lifting a ban established in 1997 that would allow for the positioning of even more towers. When concerned parents contacted the school district for an explanation of its wireless policies, the administration assembled a document, “Health Organization Information and Academic Research Studies Regarding the Health Effects of Cell Tower Signals.” The report carefully selected pronouncements from telecom industry funded organizations such as the American Cancer Society and out-of-date scientific studies supporting the FCC’s stance on wireless while excluding the long list of studies and literature reviews pointing to the dangers of RF and EMF radiation emitted by wireless networks and cell towers.”

(will not be published)

Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved. is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!