HARVARD GRAD VERSUS HARVARD GRADS ON WIRELESS IN THE FULLERTON SCHOOLS


Another Letter to the Troy PTSA-On behalf of the Troy students, Harvard grad Anne Sinek refuses to heed the warnings of Harvard experts and fellow Harvard Grads.

All of these PTA officers and their pals are working together to bring radiation and wireless devices into the classroom behind everyones backs as they work in tandem to keep the lid on this from the parents and the students. HARVARD GRADS VERSUS HARVARD GRADS LADIES AND GENTLEMEN working to ensure chilren’s exposure to potentially harmful levels of microwave radiation.

 

download (1)

Shame on Anne Sinek- Harvard interviewer for Troy- High School-as she ignores the Harvard experts as she works to put an emerging public health crisis into our children’s school environment.

Parents Voice USA founder MJ Noor- Harvard Grad says hard wire the schools-WHY DOES THIS HARVARD GRAD GET IT AND ANNE SINEK DOESN’T?

Costa Mesa Tea Party EMF Presentation

Artificial electromagnetic fields generated by WiFi equipment in the classroom pose a danger if students are left unprotected. Learn how EMF can effect student health.

Posted by The Parents' Voice USA on Wednesday, September 21, 2016

HARVARD GRAD MJ NOOR CALLS WIRELESS IN SCHOOLS “EXTREMELY DANGEROUS”

WHY DOES THIS HARVARD GRAD GET IT AND ANNE SINEK DOESN’T?

acacia 2

unnamed (1)

Fullerton PTA president Karen Allen the reporter Vivien Moreno from Fullerton High School PTA who censors information twice a month with the Foolerton Observer

 

WHY IS CATHY KUBO, TROY TSO PRESIDENT AND SO CALLED FAITHFUL CHRISTIAN SERVANT BRINGING IN THE TOOLS FOR FORCED IRRADIATION AND COMMON CORE WIRELESS CHROMEBOOKS TO TROY WHEN SHE IS SUPPOSEDLY SUPPOSED TO BE AGAINST COMMON CORE? HOW CAN THIS SO CALLED FAITHFUL CHRISTIAN SERVANT BE AIDING AND ABETTING THE FORCED IRRADIATION, PRIVACY VIOLATIONS AND THE DATA MINING OF OUR CHILDREN’S PRIVATE INFORMATION WHILE WEARING THE FAITHFUL CHRISTIAN SERVANT BLACK SHIRTS?

KUBO

 

Re:  Harvard graduates, affiliates work and statements on wireless radiation health effects and FCC corruption

Good day PTSA members and staff.

It has come to my attention that in my previous email regarding the work of Harvard graduates and Harvard fellows, one of the links was in pdf format and, perhaps, not accessible.  To rectify that I am sending you, again, the work of Harvard Fellow, Norm Alster.  That link is below.

Additionally, I have come across two more Harvard educated sources,  Ron Powell, Ph.D., and Dr.  David Carpenter, which I think should interest you.  Dr.  Powell is a “retired U.S. Government scientist (Ph.D., Applied Physics, Harvard University, 1975).”  During his career he worked for the Executive Office of the President, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.  Dr.  Carpenter serves as director of the Institute for Health and the Environment, a Collaborating Center of the World Health Organization, as well as a professor of environmental health sciences at UAlbany’s School of Public Health.

It is duly noted that PTSA Volunteer Coordinator Kimberly Blanks is not “interested” in receiving information pertinent to the health and wellbeing of Troy students and teachers, as she has requested that I “refrain from sending any more of this information” to her.  As well, PTSA member Cecile Guerra has also requested that she be removed from the distribution list.  It is not clear to me that they understand that Troy PTSA, of which they are members, has worked to fund wireless Chromebooks which emit radiation and are a health hazard for all of our children.  If they have no interest, then it naturally begs the question:  what are they doing volunteering with the Troy PTSA, which is dedicated to the education of our children?  Nevertheless, I will no longer email them.

Alster, Norm. Captured agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is dominated by the industries it presumably regulates. Cambridge, MA:  Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University.  2015.

An Expose of the FCC:  An Agency Captured by the Industries it Regulates

Excerpts

“A detailed look at FCC actions—and non-actions—shows that over the years the FCC has granted the wireless industry pretty much what it has wanted.

Money—and lots of it—has played a part … In all, CTIA, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile USA, and Sprint spent roughly $45 million lobbying in 2013. Overall, the Communications/Electronics sector is one of Washington‘s super heavyweight lobbyists, spending nearly $800 million in 2013-2014, according to CRP data.

As a result, consumer safety, health, and privacy, along with consumer wallets, have all been overlooked, sacrificed, or raided due to unchecked industry influence …. Most insidious of all, the wireless industry has been allowed to grow unchecked and virtually unregulated, with fundamental questions on public health impact routinely ignored. Industry control, in the case of wireless health issues, extends beyond Congress and regulators to basic scientific research. And in an obvious echo of the hardball tactics of the tobacco industry, the wireless industry has backed up its economic and political power by stonewalling on public relations and bullying potential threats into submission with its huge standing army of lawyers. In this way, a coddled wireless industry intimidated and silenced the City of San Francisco, while running roughshod over local opponents of its expansionary infrastructure.

… Currently presiding over the FCC is Tom Wheeler, a man who has led the two most powerful industry lobbying groups: CTIA and NCTA. It is Wheeler who once supervised a $25 million industry-funded research effort on wireless health effects. But when handpicked research leader George Carlo concluded that wireless radiation did raise the risk of brain tumors, Wheeler‘s CTIA allegedly rushed to muffle the message. ”You do the science. I‘ll take care of the politics,” Carlo recalls Wheeler saying.”

Source:  http://www.saferemr.com/2015/06/an-expose-of-fcc-agency-captured-by.html

—————————————————-

Ronald Powell, Ph.D.

Messages to Schools and Colleges about Wireless Devices and Health

“So many serious biological effects have been found that immediate responsive action is warranted. Further, these biological effects are occurring at levels of radiation far lower than earlier understood. Simply stated, a worldwide health crisis is emerging and is becoming a hallmark of the 21st Century. The international biomedical research community is trying to warn us; but we, in the USA, are not yet listening.”

This letter is one of the many communiqués from Dr.  Powell.

Source:  http://www.electronicsilentspring.com/ron-powell-message-schools/

——————————————————–

Dr.  David Carpenter

Dr.  David Carpenter talks about wireless cancer risks and what you can do to protect your family

Regarding wifi in schools, “everyone will be adversely affected.”

Source:  http://emfsafetynetwork.org/dr-david-carpenter-talks-about-wireless-cancer-risks-and-what-you-can-do-to-protect-your-family/

This is one example of Dr.  Carpenter’s message regarding wireless radiation health hazards.

The work of fellow Harvard fellows and professors should be of great interest, as Troy PTSA is working to bring wireless radiation into our children’s school environment, clearly in direct conflict with these Harvard experts.

Again, what sense does it make to aspire to attend Harvard University and, at the same time, totally disregard their learned expertise and dire warnings as expressed in the words of Dr.  Powell:   “Simply stated, a worldwide health crisis is emerging and is becoming a hallmark of the 21st Century.”

Sincerely,

Mr.  Joe Imbriano

Attachments area
  1. #1 by Troy PTSA pushing microwave radiation into our children's classrooms on March 9, 2016 - 9:35 am

    Why are they doing this? What makes them think they have the right to expose everyone else’s children to wireless radiation while at school?

    Most seem to be moms, but what kind of moms are they? They won’t look at the information. It is a “public health crisis”. The very least they could do is err on the side of precaution.

    They should all resign.

    • #2 by Moms? on March 30, 2016 - 8:33 am

      I agree, what kind of moms are they?

      • #3 by Anonymous on March 30, 2016 - 9:19 am

        They’re probably moms that don’t believe idiotic conspiracy theory junk.

        • #4 by Fullerton Lover on July 9, 2016 - 9:14 pm

          You know I try to mostly ignore the anonymous posts that NEVER have any evidence to support what they are ascertaining, however I really do think it’s necessary to point out that the mother who founded the local group,”Parents Voice USA”, is not only a Harvard graduate herself, she also raised two sons who went through the International Baccalaureate program at Troy High School, and have both received scholarships into some of the most prestigious universities in the world at the ripe old age of 16, so you would be hard pressed to convince me or any one else that M.J. Noor is an “idiotic conspiracy theorist”

          http://www.ocregister.com/articles/noor-721538-michael-troy.html

          I personally think that Fullerton children would have greatly benefited by electing M.J. Noor to the Fullerton School Board.

          Instead they got a bunch of retread incumbents that the teachers unions support in order to enrich themselves.

          Note to Fullerton voters:

          Your being played not only by the public safety unions who work 24/7 to get their candidates elected to city council to enrich themselves, but also by the local teacher’s unions and phony groups like NUFF,and candidates like Sharon Quirk Silva, whose quest for better salaries and benefits for Teachers and administrators in Fullerton, now eats up greater than 85% of the amount budgeted each year in Fullerton to educate our children.

          • #5 by Anonymous on July 9, 2016 - 10:30 pm

            You can’t prove a negative. There isn’t any credible evidence to support the theory that consumer wireless devices cause harm, so there you go.

            • #6 by Fullerton Lover on July 9, 2016 - 11:43 pm

              I truly believe that there are a lot of people like yourself who are probably really nice people who just accept that if the government says that it’s ok than it must be ok.

              This woman in Irvine had been reassured that the pesticides that the city of Irvine we’re perfectly acceptable and completely safe… that was up until her own daughter developed cancer after continually being exposed to this pesticide by playing in school playgrounds that had been sprayed with this pesticide.

              Irvine no longer uses this pesticide.

              http://www.ocweekly.com/news/how-irvine-became-socals-first-non-toxic-city-7317638

              • #7 by Anonymous on July 10, 2016 - 9:05 am

                Pesticides are not wifi.

                • #8 by Fullerton Lover on July 10, 2016 - 9:30 am

                  It’s an allegory.

                  • #9 by Anonymous on July 10, 2016 - 9:05 pm

                    Do you even know what an allegory is?

                    • #10 by Joe Imbriano on July 11, 2016 - 12:45 am

                      Of course as the most of the book of Revelation is written in allegorical language.

                    • #11 by Fullerton Lover on July 11, 2016 - 8:13 pm

                      Wasn’t he the Vice-President that invented the internet?

                  • #12 by Anonymous on July 11, 2016 - 5:36 am

                    Wait, you take Revelations as allegory, but Genesis as literal? How do you draw the line as to where you pick and choose what to believe?

            • #13 by Anon on July 10, 2016 - 6:59 am

              Troll.

              • #14 by Anonymous on July 10, 2016 - 9:06 am

                And you’re a real peach!

  2. #15 by DR-J on April 14, 2016 - 12:12 pm

    Well from a Technology standpoint, if the school allows students to use devices that produce this radiation, it could cause interference with any antiquated existing wired technology already in use. I hope they have a big budget to replace all those CAT 5 cables running throughout their classrooms with the shielded upgraded CAT 6 or 7 cabling. Otherwise when students use the new chromebooks, the interference of WIFI could cause their office desktops to stop working if there is enough interference.
    From a classroom standpoint, students aren’t allowed to use WIFI in the classroom unless the students are instructed to by their teachers (AR 6164). So teachers using Google Classroom to teach their classes would have to give students a wired way to do so. Hence the need for upgrading at least part of the campus into a tech savy “wired” safehaven. This means more networking cables and places to “plug in.” It also means more network traffic through the schools wired network, which doesn’t necessarily increase the amount of data being downloaded (since all students are required to use the schools wireless system in order to download data while on school premises) but would increase the amount of data if a school that only previously had wired connections suddenly offered wireless to all students who would be required to use the schools wireless system in accordance with the Districts AR 6164 policy. Thus making the schools wireless data plan much more expensive to provide to students.

    From a budgeting standpoint, wireless is the initially cheaper and less safe alternative to cabling. Accessibility will allow more info to be downloaded while students are “wireless” which may increase the amount of data downloaded by students and amount of radiation produced, which makes a “plug in” connection more affordable and more safe, unless it is a true unlimited/non-bottleneck data plan. Whether it will be at the cost of students health however remains to be seen. More research should be done into the types of devices being used before a decision is made “officially,” which could benefit the school later if any legal action is taken because of students developing illnesses.

  3. #16 by Anonymous on July 10, 2016 - 5:26 pm

    How come these pta moms Sinek & Kubo are ignoring all of the science and wanting to harm the kids?

    • #17 by Anonymous on July 10, 2016 - 9:02 pm

      Because they’re not harming the kids. There’s no credible science to ignore.

      • #18 by Anonymous on July 11, 2016 - 7:15 am

        You are dangerous to the kids as well. You are denying the science. Are all of these your children at Troy?

        Stay away from kids.

        • #19 by Anonymous on July 11, 2016 - 11:15 am

          Again, there is no credible science to deny. I’m sorry you don’t have any idea of how the world works – it must be a scary place for you.

          • #20 by Anonymous on July 18, 2016 - 7:12 am

            You are a liar.

            You are going to extra lengths to defend indefensible ‘leaders’, so-called parents, who push for wireless tech that will fill the classrooms and mandate all day exposure of students and teachers to microwave radiation.

            Microwave radiation has been studies for decades because it is used in radar and covert weaponry. The science studies number in the thousands and the truth has been denied for decades. The kids and teachers are getting sick in these classrooms.

            Why are you lying? Do you hate the kids and teachers?

            • #21 by Anonymous on July 18, 2016 - 9:36 am

              No shit it’s been used in RADAR and weaponry… at power levels many orders of magnitude greater than any piece of available consumer communications equipment. Wifi is completely harmless.

              I’m sorry you don’t understand math or physics. Must be hard tying your shoelaces in the morning.

              • #22 by Anonymous on July 19, 2016 - 9:47 am

                Shut up, you spew lies that the children are paying the price for. Your ignorance and denial is dangerous, especially to the kids.

                There is no evil like that which harms children.

                Are these your children? NO!

                • #23 by Anonymous on July 19, 2016 - 1:46 pm

                  Wow, such anger. What lies have been spewed?

                • #24 by Fullerton Lover on July 19, 2016 - 3:34 pm

                  Relax.

                  Mr. Karrafa has no children, and yet still poses as a hot dog at Halloween, so I don’t think there’s any chance of him breeding any time soon and re-producing.

                  Just sayin.

                  • #25 by Anonymous on July 19, 2016 - 7:25 pm

                    Who?

                  • #26 by Anonymous on July 19, 2016 - 9:51 pm

                    So, glad he can’t breed.

  4. #27 by Anonymous on July 17, 2016 - 6:53 pm

    Is MJ running for school board again? This should be interesting

    • #28 by Anonymous on July 18, 2016 - 8:45 am

      MJ knows that wireless radiation is “extremely dangerous.”

  5. #29 by Troy Irradiators on August 10, 2016 - 1:42 pm

    This is what those that continue to ignore the science on microwave radiation and raise money and push for more wireless devices in schools create. This is the harm done to children and teachers. If you are not actively helping to stop this, you are turning your backs on the kids. No excuses, you are part of the problem and are responsible.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wghaMbzRnb4

    Fullerton moms Knowles & Garden just don’t care, they continue to ignore or deny.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Z3d8FxFhQk

    Acacia Foundation just doesn’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz8ZsQ8trxE

    Fullerton School District just doesn’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWexZVXowsU

    Fullerton High School District trustees Hathaway, Kilponen, Buchi, Singer & Montoya just don’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhwd8_r_a9M

    FJUHSD Supt. Scambray, Principal Will Mynster and Tech Chairperson Jesse Knowles just don’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2CK1A2GGmI

    Fullerton School District trustees Sugarman, Berryman, Thornley, Meyer & Thompson just don’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGP8c73beOE

    FSD union leader Mrs. Montoya just doesn’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiTtwj7LpGw

    Troy H.S. PTSA just doesn’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i27kXMvY8k

    Troy H.S. Foundation just doesn’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUC_t6qiYY8

    Teachers sitting back and doing nothing just don’t care.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEEnDwOjc7E
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv6kikjBzug
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsPBUuwCfaI

    • #30 by Mat Caraffa on August 10, 2016 - 7:57 pm

      They don’t care because they are capable of rational thought and are able to assess the actual scientific evidence, which does not point to the panicked conclusions the fans of this site ignorantly believe.

      • #31 by Fullerton Lover on August 10, 2016 - 10:02 pm

        But can they read?

        http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cellphone-5g-health-20160808-snap-story.html

        p.s. bad news for you is that the tumors are mainly occurring in the male rats.

        ..

      • #32 by Troy Irradiators on August 12, 2016 - 4:32 pm

        They don’t care because their egos or beliefs about wireless radiation outweigh ALL OTHER CONSIDERATIONS. All other considerations have been subordinated to the use of wireless.

        This is so important to them, that they are willing to throw everyone else’s children under the bus to achieve their selfish, ego-driven goals of irradiating all Troy students and teachers.

  6. #33 by Joe Imbriano on April 4, 2017 - 10:14 am

    Radiation levels inside Troy High School are 1000 times higher than in an average home that has WiFi, cordless phones, wireless printers, smart Tv’s, lap tops, X box and cell phones. Troy has metal walls and huge access points. The Troy students are getting sick.

    • #34 by Anonymous on April 5, 2017 - 2:14 pm

      The students & teachers are getting slowly cooked.

    • #35 by Anonymous on April 6, 2017 - 9:56 am

      What evidence do you have to back this assertion?

      • #36 by Joe Imbriano on April 6, 2017 - 10:05 am

        From: The Fullerton Informer [mailto:joeimbriano777@gmail.com]
        Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 11:20 AM
        To: Mark R. Bresee
        Subject: Re: Fullerton Joint Union High School District [AALRR-Cerritos.005487.00223]

        Mr Breesee, where do you see in any of my emails or hear in any of my voice mails that I have made a “demand” or requested “special access”? I have asked for a tour of the campus and the classrooms. My request has not been answered.

        Mark R. Bresee
        Feb 24

        to me
        Mr. Imbriano,
        Your request was answered in my letter, and again in this email — your request, however you choose to characterize it, is denied.

        Regards,

        Mark R. Bresee | Partner
        Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
        16870 West Bernardo Drive, Suite 330, San Diego, CA 92127
        Direct (562) 653-3437 • Main (858) 485-9526 • Direct Fax (562) 653-3658 • Cell (949) 294-7439
        MBresee@aalrr.com | vcard | bio | website | subscribe | blog

        On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Mark R. Bresee wrote:
        Mr. Imbriano,

        Please see attached correspondence regarding your request/demand for Troy High School campus access.

        Regards,

        Mark R. Bresee | Partner
        Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
        16870 West Bernardo Drive, Suite 330, San Diego, CA 92127
        Direct (562) 653-3437 • Main (858) 485-9526 • Direct Fax (562) 653-3658 • Cell (949) 294-7439

        Dear Mr. Imbriano:

        As you know, this firm represents the Fullerton Joint Union High School District, and this letter responds to your most recent written demand for access to the Troy High School campus, and
        presumably to whatever parts of the campus you wish to see. You have previously demanded access to campus beyond access provided to other citizens and parents of students, and were
        denied that access. You have also been notified of a belief you intended to record activities on campus, and the legal concerns associated with that intent. Your most recent request is denied. At designated times there are organized tours for parents of
        incoming students, specifically during Open Enrollment orientation events. You are welcome to participate in those tours on the same terms as other parents, and are of course permitted to attend events on campus that are open to the general public or open to parents of Troy students.

        The campus is not otherwise open to parents or others for guided tours or special access. Again, your request/demand for special access is denied. We trust that after receipt of this letter
        you will understand that future requests/demands for special access beyond the access provided to others are also denied. Additionally, please be advised that if you again make such
        requests/demands in the future you should not expect, nor will you receive, correspondence informing you of what you have already been told on multiple occasions.

        Sincerely,

        ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO

        Mark R. Bresee

        • #37 by Joe Imbriano on April 6, 2017 - 10:09 am

          What are these devils hiding? Radiation levels inside Troy High School are 1000 times higher than in an average home that has WiFi, cordless phones, wireless printers, smart Tv’s, lap tops, X box and cell phones. Troy has metal walls and huge access points. The Troy students are getting sick. I can prove this. The school officials need to go to jail.

          • #38 by Anonymous on April 7, 2017 - 1:56 am

            Hey Joe, that chrome domed, bald ass lawyer just told you to go fuck yourself. Whadya gonna do?

        • #39 by Anonymous on April 6, 2017 - 10:40 am

          This is unbelievable Joe.

  7. #40 by Bill Chaffee on April 5, 2017 - 6:42 pm

    The problem with science is that it gets corrupted and the scientific method is ignored. The Gardasil vaccine is a case in point. The vaccine was compared to the aluminum adjuvant rather than a true placebo. Since the aluminum adjuvant had serious side effects including death in clinical trials to vaccine was deemed safe because it wasn’t shown to be significantly more dangerous than the adjuvant.

  8. #41 by I voted for MJ on April 9, 2017 - 7:56 am

    I will make sure we vote for her again if she runs. She is a good woman who needs to be in a position to help our students. I wish we had more people like her to run for office in our community.

    • #42 by Anonymous on April 13, 2017 - 6:05 pm

      If she were to run and get elected, we are guaranteed to get more of the same. We do have more people “like her” running. In fact, they were elected and here we are.

      BTW, I voted for her, too.

      • #43 by Anonymous on April 15, 2017 - 2:15 pm

        MJ Noor is bad news. She is a two faced liar.

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!