The radical homosexual and forced vaccination agendas advancing at Fullerton’s Troy high school


Isn’t it bad enough that we have an adderral epidemic on campus, a grade rippoff in full swing, bogus science being taught, children being pushed to the point of being broken, sleep deprived, perverted,  and now fully indoctrinated. Look gang, no matter what side if any you take on this issue, balance in reporting is a hallmark in journalism.

10429820_10152796554855546_7745489365173240764_nNo such luck over on Dorothy where the out of control teachers go through principals like underwear and the pink backing and sleep deprivation gets a few children’s names on a plaque in the office where all of these agendas are being orchestrated just so they think that they can get a job anywhere in the world to drug people or invent more weapons. Yeah and its all on your dime. When I went to high school, we were there to learn and the school officials and staff were there to help us learn. Now the students are being told what and how to think. School newspapers carry tremendous weight on a campus full of impressionable, hormone laden teens addicted to peer pressure and social media. We almost had full sex ed over the summer instead of a health class but I digress. Now the talk of wireless coming to Troy will make the same liberal creeps that run the school drool. Folks, it is all about reducing the population period! Changing attitudes towards the traditional family, forced wireless exposure, and forced vaccinations are all tools being employed to do just that. Funny how some going along for the ride are clueless as to what they are involved in, or are they?

troy

Fullerton’s flagship Troy High school where the gay  flag trumps The United States Flag

 

troy gay

Letters to the editor from parents go unpublished while the eugenics agendas are advanced by Troy’s extremely liberal cabal of faculty members.

vaccine

Check out this pro forced vaccination piece above leaving the last paragraph to the author of the most tyrannical bill in California’s history.

Look below here what the High School newspaper is promoting to students.

jenn

Capture

CALIFORNIA IS BLOOMING WITH THESE INDIVIDUALS?

IS IT TIME TO OPEN YOUR EYES TO THE LIES: WHAT THE WORTHLESS PHONY CHURCHES AND SICKOS IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WHO PROMOTE THIS WILL NEVER TALK ABOUT? THIS IS FOR ALL OF WHO ARE WORRIED ABOUT BEING POLITICALLY CORRECT. 

CAUTION-NOT SUITABLE FOR YOUNG READERS.


SAVECALIFORNIA.COM NEWS RELEASE

http://savecalifornia.com/11-17-15-why-charlie-sheen-got-hiv.html

November 17, 2015 — For Immediate Release

Actor Charlie Sheen likely caught HIV from male-to-male sexual contact
Thomasson: “When Sheen had sexual liaisons with homosexuals and transsexuals, he opened himself to being infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS”

Sheen said that he does not know how he contracted the disease and balked at Lauer’s question about engaging in high-risk behaviors. “You’re talking about needles and that whole mess? No, definitely not.”

CDC: US Sexually Transmitted Disease Epidemic Worsening, Nov. 17, 2015: A U.S. sexually transmitted diseases epidemic is increasing and the most common infection, chlamydia, has risen to record levels, government officials say. Reported cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis all increased in 2014.

Disclaimer: This is not suitable for young children.

NR CorrectingCharlieSheen bw 111715 441x240


Sacramento, California —
SaveCalifornia.com, a leading family values organization in California, says actor Charlie Sheen’s public denial over the cause of his HIV infection must be corrected, so that fewer, not more, young people acquire HIV/AIDS through ignorance.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that HIV is primarily spread through “male-to-male sexual contact” and “anal sex” in particular.

CDC: Surveillance Report, Vol. 25, Diagnoses of HIV Infection in theUnited States and Dependent Areas, 2013
“Transmission category: From 2009 through 2013, among adult and adolescent males, the annual number of diagnosed HIV infections attributed to male-to-male sexual contact increased. The numbers of infections attributed to injection drug use, male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use, or heterosexual contact decreased. Among adult and adolescent females, the numbers of infections attributed to injection drug use or heterosexual contact decreased. In 2013, among adult and adolescent males and females, the diagnosed infections attributed to male-to-male sexual contact (68%, including male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use) and those attributed to heterosexual contact (25%) accounted for approximately 93% of diagnosed HIV infections in the United States.”

[Note: This same 2013 report estimated that HIV was transmitted to male adults and male adolescents in these modes: male-to-male sexual contact 30,689 (81%), injection drug use 1,942 (5.1%), male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use 1,270 (3.3%), heterosexual contact 3,887 (10.2%), other 99 (0.02%). When injection drug users are excluded (5.1%), around 95% of male HIV infections are sexually-transmitted, primarily through homosexual behavior.]

CDC: HIV Surveillance Special Report: Men Who Have Sex with Men, 20 U.S. Cities, 2011
“Approximately 1.1 million persons in the United States are living with HIV infection [1]. In 2010, the estimated number of new HIV infections was 47,500: of those, 63% were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact, 25% to heterosexual contact, 8% to injection drug use, and 3% to male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use.”[2] [Note: According to this CDC report, “All the participants had at least 1 male sex partner,” including those males who “self-identified as heterosexual”]

“Among men whose most recent sexual encounter was with a main partner, 83% reported having anal sex, and 49% reported having anal sex without a condom during that encounter. Among men whose most recent sexual encounter was with a casual partner, 68% reported having anal sex, and 24% reported having anal sex without a condom during that encounter.”

“Anal sex” is a top mode to transmit infections, including HIV, because of the rectum’s vulnerability from trauma and the intestines’ close proximity to veins:

Male Homosexual Behavior, Facts About Youth, American College of Pediatricians
“Anal intercourse is the sine qua non of sex for many gay men. Yet human physiology makes it clear that the body was not designed to accommodate this activity. The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants and is supported by a network of muscles. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage and to resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm. In comparison, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an “exit-only” passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic.

“The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids.

“Furthermore, ejaculate has components that are immunosuppressive. In the course of ordinary reproductive physiology, this allows the sperm to evade the immune defenses of the female. Rectal insemination of rabbits has shown that sperm impaired the immune defenses of the recipient. Semen may have a similar impact on humans.

“The end result is that the fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, make anal-genital intercourse a most efficient manner of transmitting HIV and other infections.”

Health Risks of the Homosexual Lifestyle, Facts About Youth, American College of Pediatricians
Common sexual practices among gay men lead to numerous STDs and physical injuries, some of which are virtually unknown in the heterosexual population. Lesbians are also at higher risk for STDs. In addition to diseases that may be transmitted during lesbian sex, a study at an Australian STD clinic found that lesbians were three to four times more likely than heterosexual women to have sex with men who were high-risk for HIV.

Transgenderism has the highest rate of new HIV infections:

CDC: HIV Among Transgender People
“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that the highest percentage of newly identified HIV-positive test results was among transgender people (2.1%). For comparison, the lowest percentages of newly identified HIV-positive test results were among females (0.4%), followed by males (1.2%).”

Why The CDC’s Latest HIV Report Is So Alarming, Advocate, Jan. 8, 2014
“A December report by the Centers for Disease Control says that an estimated 27 percent of transgender women are HIV positive, and that HIV prevalence for transgender women is nearly 50 times as high as for other adults.”

Charlie Sheen reportedly engaged in bisexuality — male-to-male sexual contact — including with transsexuals:

Porn star who had sex with Hollywood actor secretly battling HIV fears epidemic as she reveals he has slept with at least 50 ‘adult actresses’ AND transsexuals, Daily Mail, Nov. 13, 2015: “He is bisexual too — he would pay girls to bring him transsexuals to have sex with. … He’d have a girl bring three at a time because if he didn’t like them he wanted to have a choice.”

Charlie Sheen AIDS cover-up, National Enquirer, Nov. 16, 2015: “He’s slept with thousands of women — and men!”

Charlie Sheen ‘HIV Positive,’ WND, Nov. 17, 2015: “Sheen’s interview with Lauer follows weeks of reports by RadarOnline, the Sun and the Enquirer that a Hollywood star known for sleeping with adult film stars, prostitutes and transgender men tested positive for the virus in 2013.”

“When Sheen had sexual liaisons with homosexuals and transsexuals, he opened himself to being infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS,” said Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, which promotes moral virtues for the common good. “No one should be in denial about the facts documented by the CDC — that male homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality is the highest risk and the most frequent transmitter of HIV.”

“What’s the lesson of Charlie Sheen?” Thomasson asked. “That for the sake of health and life, everyone should agree that sexual promiscuity and homosexual behavior invite infection and should be discouraged, and that marriage with fidelity between a husband and wife is the real ‘safe sex’ and should be promoted. These are the trustworthy facts that every teen and pre-teen should be taught.”

— end —

SaveCalifornia.com is a leading West Coast nonprofit, nonpartisan organization standing strong for moral virtues for the common good. We represent children and families in the areas of marriage and family, parental rights, the sanctity of human life, religious freedom, financial freedom, and back-to-basics education.

 

  1. #1 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 4, 2015 - 6:19 pm

    What year is this? 1989??? Is it so terrible that students would actually be ok with, wow I don’t know, people that identify with the LGBTQ community? It’s not like it’s a natural part of life or anything. I’m starting to think that it’s useless to try and fix things in this so called land of the free. Where people who are different are exposed to these kinds of radical yes radical claims that school should not be a place where students are allowed to voice their own opinions in safety. Have Any of the writers for this terrible online b rated newsletter ever even gone to Troy high school at this moment, when Troy students surpass many of the nation average students? I don’t think so. Otherwise you would notice that the students at Troy are honestly decent human being, and that for the most part, adequately liberal, not radical. I’m sure that the school Gay Straight Alliance was happy to read a success in basic human rights for marriage equality. But obviously there are many like the writer of this horrible column that are so against gays that they feel the need to put down a STUDENT WRITTEN newspaper for advocating for the amazing case of gay marriage being legalized in all fifty states. You guys are ignorant beyond belief. And by the way, the Fullerton informer, is the worst.

    • #2 by Troy student also on December 4, 2015 - 7:03 pm

      I think Mr. Imbriano, the writer of this website, has presented his opinion followed by well documented medical facts. Is he not free to do so as are you?

      Why do you appear to be so intolerant of his opinion? That is the problem with the GSA at Troy. It is so one sided. I am glad that this side of the story is finally being told so other students can make decisions for their own well being. I am afraid of the students at school who will attack me or no longer associate with me because my parents did not vaccinate me and I believe in traditional values and freedom. Students like us are now the ones afraid to stand up for what we believe in for fear of retaliation from teachers and classmates. You can’t have it both ways.

      • #3 by Anonymous on December 4, 2015 - 9:33 pm

        Well said. There is no tolerance for differing opinions, especially if they are based on traditional values.

      • #4 by student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 10:09 am

        Well, fine. Here’s my “opinion”. I have no problem with people stating their opinions. I do have a problem however, when a person decides to call the support of the LGBTQ community as a “radical homosexual agenda”. That kind of “opinion” is an example of the abuse of our first amendment rights, the freedom of speech. Accusing a public school of pushing homosexuality onto its students can only have malicious intent.

        Also, your statement about how you’re afraid of the student and teachers at Troy is most likely total bs. As a majority of the school is liberal, and

        • #5 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 11:54 am

          If you have a problem with calling the support of the lgbtq community a “radical homosexual agenda” then, likewise, you should have a problem with the outright celebration of gay marriage.

          There are many different religions, cultures at Troy. This is not to be celebrated. Be respectful of individuals and quit trying to justify the promotion of being gay by telling everyone what to think in Oracle.

          Who is Troy to force their opinions on all the students. What do you think would happen if students that did not agree with gay marriage and actually expressed this at Troy?

          They really aren’t allowed to without retribution and you know that. Troy is total and complete pc.

          Abuse of 1st amendment??? In what way, precisely???

      • #6 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 10:34 am

        First of all, I have no problem with someone voicing their opinion. I do have a problem with a person that accuses a public school with forcing a “radical homosexual agenda” on its students.

        Secondly, what? How would you be afraid of the students at Troy? Troy as a majority, is fairly liberal and primarily full of Asians. As you claim you are a Troy student, how many fights have you seen that have been instigated by an Asian? In fact, how many fights have you even seen at Troy? In my whole 3 and a half school years at Troy, I’ve seen 0 actual physical fights.

        Third, how in the world is the Gay Straight Alliance at Troy one sided?! Do you even know what that means? What is it only for Gays?! Is the whole school dominated by homosexuals? What is your proof that the GSA is one sided? And how does the existence of that club detrimental to your “well being”?! What, are you afraid that you will become a homosexual? Honey, please, if you were afraid of that, then sorry to break it to you, but you’re probably gay already.

        You claim that you believe in “traditional values and freedom”, yet you can’t even let a school newspaper write on such wonderful action for gay marriage equality without accusing them of forcing a “radical homosexual agenda” on its students. And “well documented medical facts”?! ABOUT WHAT? You’re obviously not a Troy Tech student, as you would realize what a hypocrite you are being. You claim that only one side of a story is being told, yet you rely only on the references of one person.

        I am so intolerant of Mr. Joe Imbriano’s opinion because of its intent to harm the school, and his obvious intolerance for the homosexual community. He can talk all he wants, just as I am allowed to voice my extreme dislike of such a figure who finds it acceptable to attack a school newspaper, where students feel it is safe to voice their own opinions.

        Lastly, you’re very naive. If you are SO afraid of standing up for yourself in ” fear of retaliation from teacher and classmates” then leave. No one is forcing you to stay. If you really did not feel safe at Troy, then you would leave. but obviously you are just a person looking for attention, and willing to act and write like an imbecile to get it.

    • #7 by Joe Imbriano on December 7, 2015 - 6:45 am

      Tell Cheney to present the facts outlined here to the student body if she wishes to celebrate all of this. I see no warnings about the dangers of this lifestyle, the dangers of vaccines or the dangers of wireless exposure in the Oracle. What I do see, however are student reporters being guided by her to pander and peddle these major issues and portray them in a positive light while TOTALLY IGNORING THE OTHER SIDES OF ALL THREE ISSUES.

      Amazingly we have cited the work of top scientists from almost every major University in the United States, you know the schools that you are all drooling over? Yes these experts warn against the very things the school plans on doing with its technology program while the students are up till 2am doing homework getting their brains shrunk from sleep deprivation just to get into a school whose graduates end up being the PHD’d scientists that the FJUHSD, PTSA and Board members and your own parents totally ignore when it comes to the wireless issue.

      Just think about all that school and homework for nothing? Makes you want to try even harder doesn’t it? Imagine after 20 years of research, you discover a cure for something only to have the education lackeys throw your work right into the trash. That is what they have all done for almost three years now.

  2. #8 by No tolerance at Troy on December 4, 2015 - 7:40 pm

    There is no tolerance for anyone at Troy unless you accept their view of the world. That includes acceptance of their view of LGBT, otherwise, as the poster says in the hallway, you are a hater.

    Why are they allowed to demand “acceptance” of gays, not “tolerance?” If you don’t accept, you are a hater. Talk about bullying.

    • #9 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 11:05 am

      mm. I sense a hint of hypocrisy. So there is no tolerance at Troy, but gays should only be tolerated not accepted? I’m sure the GSA would be more than happy to accept you. Because, yes. Everyone at Troy feels not tolerated nor accepted. Everyone at Troy is bullied, because the school attempts to provide a safe haven for its students. yes. There is no tolerance at troy, especially for gays. oh yeah don’t forget about the mentally immature students too. It’s not like we have a wonderful Best Buddies program where student are coeducated so to make them feel like normal students. Oh god no. Yes, there is no tolerance at Troy. Thank you for revealing what a terrible school Troy is. Thank you for showing the world how terrible our academics are, and for how horrible people are at Troy. We have only you to thank. Thank you for showing me how useless the concept of satire is. Thank YOu

  3. #10 by Another troy student on December 4, 2015 - 8:52 pm

    The difference is that Mr. Imbriano’s opinions dehumanize people. I don’t need to respect any racist, sexist, or homophobic opinion. It’s such a logical fallacy to assume that just because something is an opinion, it must have value on equal ground with any other opinion.
    Presented his opinion with “well documented medical facts”? Since when does that justify ignorance and homophobia? Instead of condemning people for their sexualities, maybe, I don’t know, provide schools with effective HIV and STD prevention education programs.

    • #11 by Anonymous on December 4, 2015 - 10:18 pm

      What do you mean his opinions “dehumanize” people. I don’t understand.

    • #12 by Olmstead on December 5, 2015 - 12:56 am

      In case you haven’t noticed, you have just come in contact with the third rail. You need to be careful.

  4. #13 by Dankest memers on December 4, 2015 - 10:28 pm

    nice memes bro

  5. #14 by brainwashed Troy student? on December 4, 2015 - 10:34 pm

    You have been Tavistocked. Look it up:

    Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Brainwashing of the masses since early 20th Century, courtesy of Ed Bern’s (Sigmund Freud’s nephew), Margaret Mead, Aldous Huxley, etc.

    • #15 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 11:11 am

      You have been hit by a truck full of ” i don’t care'” and ” you’re ignorant'”

  6. #16 by Allen Ortega on December 5, 2015 - 4:50 am

    Hi all,

    My name is Allen and I was Troy’s student body president last year, now attending USC. As a registered Republican and fiscal conservative, I personally find this piece of journalism by the Fullerton Informer to be absolutely atrocious. Outrage over the “Gay Flag” being positioned slightly in front of the American Flag on a school newspaper’s cover? Outrage over the fact that a student has a factually justified opinion that contradicts your outdated world view? All absolute bigotry on behalf of this “news” organization and the members of the community who support it.

    No reputable conclusive study has ever shown vaccines to cause autism or any of the other ailments cited. Kyle Patel was simply reporting facts, and it’s mind bogglingly dense that people are upset because the facts disagree with their wrong ideas about how the world is. The Oracle has no obligation to post your side of any argument if it’s factually false. The “evidence” provided by the Insider is almost comically unsupported and unrelated to the issues at hand. For instance, the statement that “Anal sex is a top mode to transmit infections” has no absolutely no relevance in this argument because the article published in The Oracle at no points advocates for students to have anal sex. Rather, it celebrates a new milestone of freedom that our country has reached. For the informer to plaster its personal and outdated biases onto what is truly an innocuous student article is the only injustice I see.

    For those who say Troy is too liberal or call its teachers bullies, please take a moment to remember that this is the third best public school in California that we’re talking about. It’s articles like the one above that stop schools from growing and keep America ranked fourteenth in education and second in ignorance. We MUST allow students to be exposed to topics on the forefront of the news, even if said topics make you uncomfortable. Personally, I have no qualms with you think homosexuals are evil or are scared of government brainwashing via vaccines. You can’t help it. All I ask is that you do not force these factually unsupported ideas upon the future of our country. While hate and bigotry may be too deeply ingrained for you to ever accept new data as it arrises, High School Students still have a chance. A chance to avoid becoming what you are. Please do not take this away from them.

    Fight on,
    Allen Ortega

    • #17 by Troy tech IB student father on December 5, 2015 - 8:01 am

      Thanks to you Mr. President. This bully person is no good for student body at Troy. Web site filled with misinformation scare students should be banned from internet. You are brave citizen.

    • #18 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 8:02 am

      Introducing Troy’s top tier product. Introducing Troy’s past ASB president. Read the response. Notice how he attacks Joe by putting words in his mouth, misquoting him and ignoring every shred of credible evidence presented on the various issues. I agree with Mr. Imbriano. These students cannot think. Unbelievable.

      • #19 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 10:39 am

        Introducing a failed family environment’s lowest rated product. Introducing a nobody who has nothing better to do then put down a highly successful student. Notice how I use parallel structure to satirize how ridiculous you sound, notice how I shed light on how little education you must have, and notice how ignorant you seem when you actual believe that insulting a student makes you better. I agree Mr. Ortega. This person has no brain, and obviously no self respect. Sad to think about. T.T

      • #20 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 10:47 am

        You clearly don’t know Troy then. Obviously, we can think. We have to think in order to outperform the average student in America. We have to think in order to score so high on SAT, ACT, and both IB and AP testing. We have to think in order to donate food to the homeless. We have to think in order to maintain such a prestigious level of academics and social equality, as a public school.

      • #21 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 11:16 am

        Introducing, someone who nobody cares about. Introducing an example of a high school drop out meth head. Notice how I insult him by accusing him of things he/she may or may not have committed. Notice how ignorant he/she seems. Notice how gullible one can be when uneducated, and without a sense of respect for others and self respect. Notice how I use parallel structure to satirize how ridiculous this person sounds. This person does not have an education or a brain. Anyone that has no respect for others deserves no respect.

    • #22 by Olmstead on December 5, 2015 - 8:30 am

      Hey Alan-you think vaping is good for high school students? You think gay marriage is conservative? You think gun control is a good thing?

    • #24 by Dear Allen, on December 5, 2015 - 9:47 am

      You’ve been brainwashed. You are unable to look at the different sides of the issue and discern. You appear to be bigoted, intolerant of those that do not like having others opinions blanketed over the entire school

      “Rather, it celebrates a new milestone of freedom that our country has reached. For the informer to plaster its personal and outdated biases onto what is truly an innocuous student article is the only injustice I see.”

      Your opinion, but not everyone’s opinion. Gays have my sympathy. Their bodies do not fit together. They cannot pro-create; how sad is that? This is all unnatural. They are clearly in a very small minority. Is this to be celebrated? No. The best we can expect is tolerance, not acceptance, not celebration.

      You are such a product of the “system.” You are making so many assumptions that I do not know where to begin.

      Please get down off of your puffed up Troy “is the third best . . . “, shed the ego and listen to others experiences at Troy.

      Please consider tolerating others viewpoints–these are some pretty hefty considerations and are required for anyone to think critically.

      Also, please read some of the perspectives of current, past Troy students. They are not in alignment with yours and the system to which you participated at Troy is intolerant of any views but Troy Oracle, Troy Admin., Troy Teachers. . . .and even past ASB presidents, Allen.

      Please begin to understand and respect others views; it will serve you well in the future.

      • #25 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 10:53 am

        Yes, you are right Sir. I have seen with my own two eyes the brainwashing machines and techniques. I have actually been a victim of this. Not only am I a respectful citizen, I am also fully capable of forming my own opinions. I also score very high on SAT, ACT, and AP tests, while regularly volunteering at the Fullerton homeless shelter. WOW, what a terrible life I’ve been forced to live. Troy needs to be stopped, the world doesn’t need natural and intuitive leaders, or scholarly students who strive to fix the global issues of our modern day. Oh God no, we can’t have such a bright future. Amen to you. Amen to the fact that the brainwashing also gave me great satirical abilities.

    • #26 by Change of heart? on December 5, 2015 - 10:11 am

      Direct quotes from Allen Ortega while at Troy….

      Though I am not religious, I was taught at a young age to always respect all forms of life. When I encounter any kind of insect or arachnid in my home, I always take it outside and allow it to live in peace. Early in my freshmen year at Troy, I was told that I would be forced to participate in a project that involved going into the natural environments of insects and systematically killing them with a gas chamber. The thought made me sick to my stomach, and I quickly went to my teacher to inform her that the project was not within my ethical limitations. I was told that in order to be assigned an alternate project I would have to bring in a note from my father detailing why I could not do the project. I promptly brought the note to my teacher, who informed me that since I did not have a religious reason that I could not complete the project, I would have to do it or receive a lowered grade. In my opinion, this is blatant religious discrimination because it assumes that only those who are religious can have strong moral convictions. I firmly believe that all life is equal on this earth, and for me, killing an insect is no more ethical than killing a dog or a bird. The fact that I was required to commit such atrocities by my school deeply troubles me, and all I can do is hope that future classes will not be put through what we were.
      -A.O.

      • #27 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 12:09 pm

        Allen appears to be fully supportive of respecting even the smallest of God’s creatures, but will not respect the reasoning/opinions of those that conflict with gay marriage.

        His expectations are that everyone should support his thinking, a celebration of gay marriage. This should be overlayed onto Troy high school via the Oracle as if it is so decreed, accepted by all students.

        It is not respectful of others to demand acceptance. People need to think, reason, and come to their own conclusions. It’s not for Troy to tell people how to think via the Oracle but that is precisely what is happening and being enforced.

  7. #28 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 8:11 am

    The Homosexual Agenda is a self-centered set of beliefs and objectives designed to promote and even mandate approval of homosexuality and homosexual ideology, along with the strategies used to implement such. The goals and means of this movement include indoctrinating students in public school, restricting the free speech of opposition, obtaining special treatment for homosexuals, distorting Biblical teaching and science, and interfering with freedom of association. Advocates of the homosexual agenda seek special rights for homosexuals that other people don’t have, such as immunity from criticism (see hate speech, hate crimes). Such special rights will necessarily come at the expense of the rights of broader society. The homosexual agenda is the biggest threat to the right of free speech today.

    In 2014, one of the top priorities of the Homosexual Agenda is to prohibit and outlaw conversion therapy, particularly for teenagers. California and New Jersey are the only states to have enacted such laws (Governor Chris Christie signed it into law as he was preparing his reelection campaign), and leftists are pushing similar bans in many other states now.

    In a speech on December 10, 2013, to a pro-family rally in Jamaica, Brian Camenker of MassResistance outlined the step-by-step approach of the homosexual agenda:[1]

    legalize homosexuality
    promote gay pride parades
    demand non-discrimination laws
    insist on homosexuals’ adoption of children
    push the homosexual agenda in schools
    force “gay marriage” on society
    demand public funding to deal with increased homosexual-related social problems
    promote the transgender agenda
    impose a large-scale loss of free speech
    ban counseling for kids confused by homosexual issues
    attack churches
    Russia is a leader in rejecting the homosexual agenda. For example, Russia banned adoption by Americans as the Obama Administration aggressively pushed the homosexual agenda, and in June 2013 a house in the Russian parliament passed legislation to ban foreign adoption by gay couples or single parents who live in any gay marriage nation.[2]

    President Barack Hussein Obama and nearly all Democrat politicians now advocate the homosexual agenda, reflecting the growing financial power of the homosexual network. Obama’s self-centered obsession with his own reelection, and fundraising for his campaign, has caused him to create a national political issue out of this, rather than deal with other issues like the economy.

    Among all the liberal belief systems, the homosexual ideology is the most self-centered or selfish – unlike the vast charity performed by churches, homosexual charity can be considered an oxymoron.

    Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia referred to the “so-called homosexual agenda” in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) (dissenting opinion).

    1 The Homosexual Agenda
    2 Specific goals
    2.1 Strategies and psychological tactics
    2.2 Influence in the academic world
    3 Opposing Christian Agenda
    4 Opponents of the Homosexual Agenda
    4.1 Peter LaBarbera
    4.2 Matt Barber
    5 Further reading
    6 See also
    7 References
    The Homosexual Agenda
    Joseph P. Gudel, in That Which is Unnatural[3] contended that the homosexual movement,
    has been militantly demanding not just the homosexuals’ right to do whatever they wish to do behind closed doors, but, more importantly, that society fully accept their lifestyle as both healthy and normal, even demanding special rights and legislation as an “oppressed minority.” Gudel quotes various sources evidencing this.

    In a 1987 speech to the National Press Club in Washington, homosexual spokesperson Jeff Levi proclaimed, We are no longer seeking just a right to privacy and a protection from wrong. We also have a right — as heterosexual Americans already have — to see government and society affirm our lives. [4]
    In an article entitled “Gays on the March” in 1975, Time magazine quoted gay activist Barbara Gittings who stated:

    What the homosexual wants, and here he is neither willing to compromise nor morally required to compromise — is acceptance of homosexuality as a way of life fully on a par with heterosexuality.” In response, Time opined, “It is one thing to remove legal discrimination against homosexuals. It is another to mandate approval….It is this goal of full acceptance, which no known society past or present has granted to homosexuals, that makes many Americans apprehensive.[5]
    A primary goal of the homosexual agenda is to promote the lifestyle in public schools. This occurred quickly and intensely after gay marriage was imposed in Massachusetts, where homosexual relationships are taught to children as young as kindergartners, as recounted by the decision of Parker v. Hurley.[6]

    In a 1992 report by John Leo in U.S. News and World Report, he notes some books which were part of New York City’s public school curriculum.

    The first-grade book, “Children of the Rainbow”, stated on page 145, which states that teachers must “be aware of varied family structures, including…gay or lesbian parents,” and “children must be taught to acknowledge the positive aspects of each type of household.” Another children book is Heather Has Two Mommies, which is about a lesbian couple having a child through artificial insemination. Another book, Gloria Goes to Gay Pride, states, “Some women love women, some men love men, some women and men love each other. That’s why we march in the parade, so everyone can have a choice.”

    Leo commented,

    A line is being crossed here; in fact, a brand new ethic is descending upon the city’s public school system. The traditional civic virtue of tolerance (if gays want to live together, it’s their own business) has been replaced with a new ethic requiring approval and endorsement (if gays want to live together, we must ‘acknowledge the positive aspects’ of their way of life).[7]
    Dr. Judith A. Reisman in her extensive Crafting “Gay” Children,[8] reports that Harvard homosexual Toby Morotta, PhD, stated that in the 1970s, members of the Gay Activists Alliance – who were trained in the “zapping” of any who rebuffed homosexuality.[9] And that these formed the “Gay Academic Union,” (GAU) which was made up of faculty and students in major universities. She states that the GAU has long fought for domination of its worldview within the academic community, and professional journals commonly assigned GAU and other homosexual peer reviewers to research touching on homosexuality, generally resulting in a quick death to possible unfavorable findings. [10]

    This and the general agenda is seen to be overall implementing a marketing strategy explained in a book called After the Ball, by gay rights activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen in the late 1980s, in which a six-point plan was set forth as to how they could transform the beliefs of ordinary Americans with regard to homosexual behavior in a decade-long time frame:

    “The agenda of homosexual activists is basically to change America from what they perceive as looking down on homosexual behavior, to the affirmation of and societal acceptance of homosexual behavior.” [11] “Thus propagandistic advertising can depict all opponents of the gay movement as homophobic bigots who are ‘not Christian’ and the propaganda can further show them [homosexuals]] as being criticized, hated and shunned…”[12]
    Focus on the Family provides additional quotes from After the Ball, outlining key points of the homosexual agenda:[11][13]

    “Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible.” (They use late night air waves and special channels, as well as their right to peacefully assemble to do so.)
    “Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers.”
    “Give homosexual protectors a just cause.”
    “Make gays look good.”
    “Make the victimizers look bad.”
    “Get funds from corporate America.”
    United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote:

    “ Today’s opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct.[14] ”
    Vic Eliason of Crosstalk America rightly points out that if all Americans turned homosexual it would only take a few generations for the United States to lose most of the population of the country through lack of procreation. This would make the US more vulnerable to attack by our enemies.

    Specific goals
    The goals of the homosexual movement include:

    Ignoring Christian morals and discouraging religiously based laws.
    Reminding the world that marriage is a legal term and standing in the US, not a spiritual one as believed by Christians.
    Ignore the clear message of the Bible that homosexuality is a sin and an abomination unto God because their first amendment rights allow them to.
    Remind conservatives that there cannot be a gay gene, just like like there cannot be a “black gene” because complex things like these are caused by complex interactions between genes.
    Censoring evidence that the “gay gene” is a hoax. After all, it would have to be multiple genes interacting together.[15]
    Censoring speech against homosexuality by branding it to be “hate-speech”[16][17][18]
    Censoring biblical statements condemning homosexuality[19]
    Lobbying for equal employment rights.[20][21]
    Expand hate crimes legislation to include sexual orientation, which would be equally wrong for heterosexuals to do.[22]
    Ending the military’s and Boy Scout’s restrictions on homosexuality[23]
    Stopping children as young as 5 years old from attending therapy to repair their sexual preference[24]
    Teach tolerance of homosexuals in schools.
    In places like Massachusetts and California, where the gay lobby is the strongest, it starts as early as preschool. They tell seven- or eight-year-old boys, “If you only like boys, there’s a chance you may be homosexual,” or “If you only like girls, maybe you are lesbian.” Children at that age also do not have the hormones to experience sexual attraction, so they cannot understand this yet.
    Demands protections from job discrimination. [25]
    Suing an online dating website for discrimination. This was because sexual orientation is a federally protected group, as such, this company was breaking the law. [26]
    Undermining the resolve of latent homosexuals so that their will becomes too weak to resist the temptations of homosexuality[27]
    Pushing for legalized adoption by gay individuals and couples[28]
    Indoctrination of public school children to support the homosexual agenda
    The state-by-state push for same-sex marriage can be viewed as a means to the above goals, or a goal in itself.[29] An example of this would be the recent New Hampshire law that makes same-sex civil unions legal.[30]

    Although notable gains toward achieving its goals continue to manifest, homosexual activists have recently been expressing a high level of dissatisfaction with the Obama administration. Commenting on such, Massresistance.org, an organization which opposes the homosexual agenda in Massachusetts, noted that the President has,

    signed an order extending federal benefits to same-sex partners.
    pushed an extreme hate crimes bill in Congress.
    declared his intention to repeal the Defense of Marriage.
    pushed a pro-homosexual and transgender version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
    appointed homosexual activists to high level positions, including Harry Knox, of the homosexual lobby group Human Rights Campaign, and Kevin Jennings, founder of the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network (GLSEN), which educates kids in the public schools.
    declared February to be “Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month.”
    Demanded the State Department allow gay couples to use their married names (from marriages or civil unions) on US passports.[31]
    Strategies and psychological tactics
    Homosexual activists are often seen as engaging in specious argumentation, such as attempts to controvert the consistent teaching of the Bible on homosexual relations (see homosexuality and biblical interpretation), and using false analogies, in order to gain acceptance of homosexuality. One common argument used by homosexual activists seeks to compare their quest for equal rights to that of others.[32] This argument is countered by the observation that blacks were able to peacefully argue that mankind should not be “judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character”[33], as the former yields no certain moral distinction. In contrast, homosexual activists seek acceptance of an immoral practice(s), and in addition, engage in certain coercive and manipulative means to do so. This includes the use of demonstrative protests, which appear to be designed to censure and intimidate those who oppose them in any way.[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] In addition, one pro-homosexual commentator recently took the homosexual community to task for being racist in their practice of homosexuality.[45] Another strategy used by supporters of the homosexual agenda is to publicly deny that such an agenda exists.[46]

    While not all homosexuals agree with the use of deceptive psychological tactics, these have been promoted by leading homosexual activists. The aforementioned book, After the Ball, is widely regarded as the handbook for the gay agenda, in which two Harvard-trained (homosexual) psychologists [47] Marshall Kirk (1957 – 2005) and Hunter Madsen (pen name Erastes Pill, who was also schooled in social marketing) advocated avoiding portraying gays as aggressive challengers, but as victims instead, while making all those who opposed them to be evil persecutors. As a means of the latter, they promoted jamming, in which Christians, traditionalists, or anyone else who opposes the gay agenda are publicly smeared. Their strategy was based on the premise that, “In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to adopt the role of protector. The purpose of victim imagery is to make straight people feel very uncomfortable.”

    “Jamming” homo-hatred (disagreement with homosexual behaviors) was to be done by linking it to Nazi horror, advised Kirk and Madsen. Associate all who oppose homosexuality with images of Klansmen demanding that gays be slaughtered, hysterical backwoods preachers, menacing punks, and a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed. Thus, “propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths…”[48][49]

    Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, writes,

    There can be no doubt that Christianity represents the greatest obstacle to the normalization of homosexual behavior. It cannot be otherwise, because of the clear biblical teachings concerning the inherent sinfulness of homosexuality in all forms, and the normativity of heterosexual marriage. In order to counter this obstacle, Kirk and Madsen advised gays to “use talk to muddy the moral waters, that is, to undercut the rationalizations that ‘justify’ religious bigotry and to jam some of its psychic rewards.” How can this be done? “This entails publicizing support by moderate churches and raising serious theological objections to conservative biblical teachings.” [The latter of which attempts homosexuality and biblical interpretation examine and expose.][50]

    Kirk and Madsen’s open admission of their deceptive tactics is noted as most revealing: [O]ur effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof. “…the person’s beliefs can be altered whether he is conscious of the attack or not”[51] “The campaign we outline in this book, though complex, depends centrally upon a program of unabashed propaganda, firmly grounded in long-established principles of psychology and advertising.”[52][53]

    Similarly, author Robert Bauman additionally records: “It makes no difference that the ads are lies… because were using them to ethically good effect, to counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies, and far more wicked ones.”[54]

    The need for Kirk and Madsen to engage in such manipulation may be seen as being due to their sober realization of the nature of the homosexual lifestyle.

    “In short, the gay lifestyle – if such a chaos can, after all, legitimately be called a lifestyle – it just doesn’t work: it doesn’t serve the two functions for which all social framework evolve: to constrain people’s natural impulses to behave badly and to meet their natural needs. While it’s impossible to provide an exhaustive analytic list of all the root causes and aggravants of this failure, we can asseverate at least some of the major causes. Many have been dissected, above, as elements of the Ten Misbehaviors; it only remains to discuss the failure of the gay community to provide a viable alternative to the heterosexual family.”[55]

    David Kupelian, author of The Marketing of Evil, describes Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, stating,

    Kirk and Madsen were not the kind of drooling activists that would burst into churches and throw condoms in the air. They were smart guys – very smart. Kirk, a Harvard-educated researcher in neuropsychiatry, work with the Johns Hopkins Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth and designed aptitude tests for adults with 200+ IQs. Madsen, with a doctorate in politics from Harvard, was an expert on public persuasion tactics and social marketing.[56]

    Marshall Kirk died in 2005 at the age of 47.[57] The cause of death has not been publicly revealed.

    Often cited as an early example of such tactics was the role of homosexual activists in persuading the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM-II). Dr. Ronald Bayer, though being himself a pro-homosexual psychiatrist, described this removal as being the result of power politics, threats, and intimidation, rather than any new scientific discoveries.[58] In so doing, like slavery before it, the homosexual agenda is seen to threaten basic freedoms, principally the First Amendment.[59]

    The charge of homophobia has also been increasingly evidenced as being part of a means of intimidation used in promoting the homosexual agenda. Due to what homophobia has been made to denote, that of being a repressed homosexual, or possessing an irrational fear of being approached by homosexuals, or of being a bigot persecuting victims, the widespread use of the term “homophobic” attaches a powerful stigma to anyone who may even conscientiously oppose the practice of homosexuality, thus silencing many who might otherwise object to it.[60]

    In relation to such oppression, psychologist Nicholas Cummings, former president of the American Psychological Association (APA), observed, “Homophobia as intimidation is one of the most pervasive techniques used to silence anyone who would disagree with the gay activist agenda.” As an example of such fear within the APA, in addressing 100 fellow professionals Cummings related that while writing “Destructive Trends in Mental Health,” with psychologist Rogers Wright, a number of fellow psychologists were invited to participate. However, these flatly turned them down, as they feared loss of tenure, loss of promotion, and other forms of professional retaliation. “We were bombarded by horror stories,” Dr. Cummings said. “Their greatest fear was of the gay lobby, which is very strong in the APA.[61]

    Noted homosexual activist and pornographer Clinton Fein, in his article, The Gay Agenda stated: “Homophobic inclinations alone, even without any actions, should be criminal and punishable to the full extent of the law.”

    Erik Holland, author of The Nature of Homosexuality, perceives that homosexuals have become so reckless in labeling others homophobic that “anyone who questions their labeling someone [is] a homophobe himself. Even quoting factual statistics about the connection between homosexuality and AIDS is allegedly homophobic.” In addition, according to pro-homosexual author Vernon A. Wall, “even acceptance of homosexuality can be seen as a form of homophobia, because to talk about the acceptance of homosexuality is to imply that there is something about homosexuality that needs acceptance.”[62]

    It may be speculated that if the liberal use of the term homophobia is not primarily a psychological tactic, then it indicates a psychological condition on the part of those who use it in which they imagine that those who oppose them are fearful of them, or of being one.

    More recently, after 25 years of claiming he was not indoctrinating anyone with pro homosexual beliefs, one activist honestly admitted to this being a lie. Canadian gay activist S. Bear Bergman, a female who identifies as a transgender male, stated, “All that time I said I wasn’t indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie.” Bergman recounted that she was instructed as a young gay activist to tell concerned parents that she was “just providing an alternate viewpoint” when accused of engaging in “indoctrination and recruiting,” and to use “soft” language when speaking about homosexuality. In her article on the notoriously liberal web site, the Huffington Post, he went on to candidly confess that this indoctrination is, “is absolutely my goal. I want to make your children like people like me and my family, even if that goes against the way you have interpreted the teachings of your religion.” Bergman fantasized that in an ideal world he would have been “ushered into the world of queerness with care and tenderness by experienced homos” (akin to “camp counselors”), “and issued my leather jacket and my protest pins, my safer sex supplies…”

    Bergman expressed that his goal was that of portraying to “impressionable young minds” the idea that “queers and transfolk are just as fine and lovely a kind of human as any other kind,” and stated that he did not like the idea of sending her kid to schools where where any kid could share with him their ideas about homosexuals. Thus Bergman, who believes that “books a kid hears at bedtime affect their sleep and also their dreams,” is finalizing a series of children’s books that all feature lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer kids or families, with the goal that the young readers come to believe that people like him and his family are “absolutely great,” that “lesbian, gay, bi, queer, and trans people — that we exist, that we’re perfectly fine and often really excellent.” Bergman then concludes, “If that makes me an indoctrinator, I accept it. Let me be honest — I am not even a little bit sorry.”[63]

    Commenting on this frank article, Pete Baklinski of LifeSiteNews.com, states that,
    While Bergman paints a “friendly and cheerful” picture of the gay lifestyle, she fails to mention the serious health risks tied to homosexual behaviors….Research done in 2002 by Dr. John R. Diggs found that same-sex sexual behaviors expose gays, lesbians and bisexuals to “extreme risks of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), physical injuries, mental disorders and even a shortened life span.” Common sexual practices among gay men were found to lead to “numerous STDs and physical injuries, some of which are virtually unknown in the heterosexual population.” Gay and bisexual men were found to “lose up to 20 years of life expectancy.” The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have warned on numerous occasions that HIV rates, already at epidemic proportions, are continuing to climb steadily among men who have ‘sex’ with men. The CDC has stated that gay and bisexual men continue to remain at the epicenter of what they call a “HIV/AIDS epidemic.”
    To which Baklinski adds the spiritual consequences, citing one of the texts in the Bible which condemn homosexual relations:

    “ “For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error” (Letter to Romans 1:26).[64] ”
    For Christians believe God created man and women uniquely compatible and complimentary, and they alone are joined by God in marriage, with opposite genders being specified by both Genesis and personally by Jesus Christ. (Gn. 2:18-24; Mt. 19:4) The Bible only condemns homosexual relations – by design and decree, in principle and by precept – and never sanctions them wherever they are manifestly dealt with, and the injunctions against them are part of the transcendent and immutable moral law. (Lv. 18:22; Rm. 1:26,27)

    However, Christians also understand that some of the first Christians were likely former homosexuals, (1Cor. 6:9-11) and believe that there is room at the cross for all who want the Lord Jesus over sin, and believe upon Him to save them who died for them, and rose again. And who thus are baptized and follow Him, to the glory of God.[65]

    Influence in the academic world
    Professor Jerry Z. Muller described in an article titled First Things (Aug/Sept. 1993) how the homosexual lobby has gained widespread acceptance in the educational realm.

    “ [Their] strategy has been remarkably successful. With a rapidity largely attributable in large part to a total lack of articulate resistance, homosexual ideology has gained an unquestioned and uncontested legitimacy in American academic life. Within the academy, as within nonacademic elite culture, the definition of opposite to homosexuality as “homophobia – a definition which implies that it is impossible to give good reasons for the cultural disapproval of homosexuality – is the best evidence of the success of this strategy.[66] ”
    Opposing Christian Agenda
    Liberals are critical of Christian groups that oppose homosexuality. These criticisms include Christian activities of:

    Threatening to shut Salvation Army soup kitchens in New York if they cannot exclude homosexuals from employment [67]
    Encouraging email activism
    Producing and disseminating gay reform information
    Influencing local media in what stories they produce
    Lobbying local, state and federal government officials to vote in the desired way on pending legislation[68]
    Calling anyone who supports gay rights a ‘sinner’ or other untrue insults.
    Opponents of the Homosexual Agenda
    Some well known individuals/groups in the United States who actively oppose the homosexual agenda are: Focus on the Family, Peter LaBarbera’s American’s for Truth, the Traditional Values Coalition (Louis Sheldon is a chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition), and Matt Barber of Concerned Women of America.

    Peter LaBarbera
    As noted earlier, Peter LaBarbera is the founder of Americans For Truth (AFT) which is a national organization in the United states devoted solely to confronting the homosexual agenda.[69]

    Peter LaBarbera said the following regarding the need for the organization Americans for Truth:

    “ Homosexual, bisexual, and transsexual groups spend tens of millions of dollars every year to market and normalize their aberrant lifestyles, yet after all these years there is not a single, serious national group dedicated specifically to exposing and countering their agendas…
    It’s time for Americans to unapologetically resist the demands of this lobby, and to counter the lies upon which it is built-the foremost being that certain people are inherently or ‘born’ homosexual and that this is a civil rights issue.[70]


    Matt Barber
    Matt Barber of Concerned Women of America is one the more notable figures in regards to opposing the homosexual agenda. Matt Barber wrote the following regarding the homosexual agenda:

    Matt Barber
    “ Ironically, sexual relativists are anything but relative. They are quite affirmative in principle. But the principles they foist demand comprehensive acceptance of homosexual conduct — by force of law — through federal edicts such as “hate crimes” legislation, the so-called “Employment Non-Discrimination Act” (ENDA) and by imposing government sanctioned “same-sex marriage.” All such government mandates grant special protected “minority” status to those who define themselves by aberrant sexual preferences and changeable sexual behaviors. These laws put people with traditional values directly in the crosshairs of official government policy.
    Throughout society, homosexual activists demand that homosexual behaviors not only be “tolerated,” but celebrated. (That’s what the euphemistic slogan “celebrate diversity” supposes). They have masked their true political agenda by hijacking the language of the genuine civil rights movement and through the crafty and disingenuous rhetoric of “tolerance” and “diversity.”

    Anyone who believes the Biblical directive that human sexuality is a gift from God, to be shared between man and wife within the bonds of marriage, is branded “homophobic,” “hateful” or “discriminatory.” They are to be silenced by all means possible.[71]


    Further reading
    Homosexuality and the Nazi Party by Scott Lively. Excellent discussion of the anti-Christian and homosexual origins of the Nazism.
    Documentation of the links between homosexuals and the Nazis by the Government of Israel.
    2008 McDonald’s and the Homosexual Agenda, Baptist Press
    Paul E. Rondeau, Selling homosexuality to America (PDF) Or html form
    See also
    ACT-UP
    Anti-Defamation League
    Anthropological Revolution
    Homosexual belief system
    Gay affirmative
    Gay rights
    Homophobia
    Hate speech, Hate crime
    Homosexual logic, used to justify and promote the homosexual agenda
    Homosexuality
    Homosexuality and biblical interpretation
    Homosexualization
    San Francisco values
    Fashion industry values
    Hollywood values
    Slogans and the Homosexual Agenda
    References
    Jump up ↑ http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/13d/jamaica-speech-121013/index.html
    Jump up ↑ http://www.latimes.com/news/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-russia-ban-adoption-gay-couples-20130618,0,4633280.story%5D
    Jump up ↑ “That Which is Unnatural” Homosexuality in Society, the Church, and Scripture Part Two in a Two-Part Series on Homosexuality, from the Christian Research Journal, Winter 1993, page 8
    Jump up ↑ Jeff Levi, in William Dannemeyer, Shadow in the Land (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1989), 86.
    Jump up ↑ Gays on the March,” Time, 8 Sept. 1975, 43
    Jump up ↑ The Parker v. Hurley decision explained, “In January 2005, when Jacob Parker (“Jacob”) was in kindergarten, he brought home a ‘Diversity Book Bag.’ This included a picture book, Who’s in a Family?, which depicted different families, including single-parent families, an extended family, interracial families, animal families, a family without children, and — to the concern of the Parkers — a family with two dads and a family with two moms. The book concludes by answering the question, ‘Who’s in a family?’: ‘The people who love you the most!’ The book says nothing about marriage.”
    Jump up ↑ John Leo, “Heather Has a Message,” U.S. News & World Report, 17 Aug. 1992, 16.
    Jump up ↑ http://www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resources/6390601.pdf
    Jump up ↑ Toby Marotta: THE POLITICS OF HOMOSEXUALITY: HOW LESBIANS AND GAY MEN HAVE MADE THEMSELVES A POLITICAL AND SOCIAL FORCE IN MODERN AMERICA, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 1981 at 319
    Jump up ↑ See extensive reports in regular NARTH Bulletins as well as Ray Johnson, “American Psychology: The Political Science, at 53-57.
    ↑ Jump up to: 11.0 11.1 After the Ball (1989), quoted from Winn, Pete (7-25-2003) [ Q&A: The Homosexual Agenda] Citizenlink
    Jump up ↑ After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90’s, by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen (Author) (p. 152-153)
    Jump up ↑ Kirk, Marshall K. and Erastes Pill (11-1987) The Overhauling of Straight America Available at STRATEGIES OF THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT: “The Overhauling of Straight America”
    Jump up ↑ LAWRENCE et al. v. TEXAS at findlaw.com
    Jump up ↑ Lesbian activists at Smith College riot, shut down Ryan Sorba speech on “The Born Gay Hoax” as police watch. See exclusive videos. Mass Resistance
    Jump up ↑ Video:Silencing Christians
    Jump up ↑ Homosexuality: It’s a Crime in England to State Christian Views
    Jump up ↑ Bishops fight for right to criticize homosexual lifestyle, 25th May 2009
    Jump up ↑ White, Hilary (04-21-2006) Court Upholds School Ban on “Homosexuality is Shameful” T-Shirt LifeSiteNews.com
    Jump up ↑ The Crimson Staff (10-13-2006) A Box of Their Own? (opinion) The Crimson
    Jump up ↑ http://www.afa.net, Homosexual Agenda Platforms from 1972 – 2000
    Jump up ↑ Pelosi, Nancy Office of (09-28-2004) Pelosi: “Hate Crimes Prevention Legislation is Right Thing to Do, Long Overdue” From the office of Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi
    Jump up ↑ Boy Scouts of Am. v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000) (Boy Scouts); “Matlovich v. Secretary of the Air Force (591 F.2d 852, DC Circ. 1 978) (military)
    Jump up ↑ National Gay and Lesbian Task Force:Youth in the Crosshairs
    Jump up ↑ [http://www.thetaskforce.org/issues/nondiscrimination/ENDA_main_page Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) | National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
    Jump up ↑ Fox News – eHarmony to Provide Gay Dating Service after Lawsuit
    Jump up ↑ http://www.thetaskforce.org/activist_center/resources_and_tools/challenge_exgay
    Jump up ↑ http://www.thetaskforce.org/issues/parenting_and_family
    Jump up ↑ Lewis v. Harris
    Jump up ↑ http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/06/01/new_hampshire_law_makes_same_sex_civil_unions_legal/
    Jump up ↑ update@massresistance.org 6/24/2009 11:56 PM
    Jump up ↑ Miner, Homosexuality, Civil Rights, and the Church
    Jump up ↑ Speech by Martin Luther King Jr.
    Jump up ↑ http://www.leaderu.com/socialsciences/sellinghomosexuality.html
    Jump up ↑ http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/after_the_ball.htm
    Jump up ↑ http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89526
    Jump up ↑ http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/08c/Prop8/church_attacks.html
    Jump up ↑ http://rebuildtheparty.ning.com/video/exodus-protest-park-street
    Jump up ↑ http://theway2k.vox.com/library/post/homosexuals-persecuting-christians-and-mormons.html
    Jump up ↑ http://www.hamiltonsquare.net/articlesRiotsSep1993.htm
    Jump up ↑ http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/may/08050205.html
    Jump up ↑ http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=95296
    Jump up ↑ Muehlenberg, Bill, Another Nail in the Christian Coffin, 4 June 2009
    Jump up ↑ Loud homosexual activists disrupt and halt Don Feder speech at UMass Amherst, despite police presence”
    Jump up ↑ LZ Granderson, Commentary: Gay is not the new black, Cable News Network,July 16, 2009
    Jump up ↑ Christians, America, And The Gay Agenda
    Jump up ↑ http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,152180,00.html
    Jump up ↑ http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/mbarber/080213
    Jump up ↑ http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/after_the_ball.htm
    Jump up ↑ After the Ball–Why the Homosexual Movement Has Won, Thursday, June 3rd, 2004
    Jump up ↑ After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s, p. 152-153 (1989, Doubleday/Bantam)
    Jump up ↑ Kirk and Madsen, After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of the Gay’s in the 90s, p.xxvi
    Jump up ↑ Behavior and Not a Person
    Jump up ↑ The Gentleman from Maryland: The Conscience of a gay Conservative, by Robert Bauman, 1986, page 163.
    Jump up ↑ Kirk and Madsen, After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of the Gay’s in the 90s, p.363
    Jump up ↑ http://pearl-diving.blogspot.com/2009/01/sold-on-homosexuality-marketing-of-evil.html
    Jump up ↑ http://www.americanancestors.org/PageDetail.aspx?recordId=134544248
    Jump up ↑ Exposed: The Myth That Psychiatry Has Proven That Homosexual Behavior Is Normal
    Jump up ↑ Adams, Guy (11-8-2008) Mormon stars face backlash after gay marriage ban The Independent
    Jump up ↑ Thought Reform And The Psychology of Homosexual Advocacy, Charles W. Socarides, M.D.
    Jump up ↑ [Psychology Losing Scientific Credibility, Say APA Insiders http://www.narth.com/docs/insiders.html%5D
    Jump up ↑ http://www.homosexinfo.org/Homophobia/HomePage
    Jump up ↑
    You must specify title = and url = when using {{cite web}}. Available parameters:
    {{cite web
    |url =
    |title =
    |accessdate =
    |accessdaymonth =
    |accessmonthday =
    |accessyear =
    |author =
    |last =
    |first =
    |authorlink =
    |coauthors =
    |date =
    |year =
    |month =
    |format =
    |work =
    |publisher =
    |pages =
    |language =
    |doi =
    |archiveurl =
    |archivedate =
    |quote =
    }}
    . Retrieved on 22 March 2015.
    Jump up ↑ Gay activist: Of course our goal is to ‘indoctrinate children into LGBTQ agenda’. Retrieved on 22 March 2015.
    Jump up ↑ HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS and the BIBLE
    Jump up ↑ Homosexuality, by F. Earle Fox, David W. Virtue, p. 12
    Jump up ↑ [1]Salvation Army Uses Homeless To Fight Gay Benefits
    Jump up ↑ Concerned Women For America About page
    Jump up ↑ http://www.americansfortruth.com/about/
    Jump up ↑ http://www.americansfortruth.com/about/
    Jump up ↑ http://www.cwfa.org/articledisplay.asp?id=14696&department=CFI&categoryid=family

    [hide]
    v • d • e
    Liberal Characteristics and Traits
    Ideology
    Atheism • Evolutionism • Eugenics • Globalism • Global warming alarmism • Hollywood values • Moral relativism • New age movement • Population control • Professor values • Scientology • Socialism • Values • Wicca
    Policy
    Abortion • Birth control • Affirmative action • Gun control • Homosexual agenda • Income redistribution • Nanny State • Nationalization • Obamacare • Politically correct • Prayer censorship • Social Justice • Statism
    Tools
    Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” • Cloward and Piven Strategy • Biased grading • Censorship • Hate speech • Judicial activism • Lies • Liberal intolerance • Liberal logic • Mainstream Media • Myths • Network abuse • Obfuscation • Pay to play • Redefinition • Revisionism • Scientific fascism • Slander • Traps • Tricks • Vandalism • Video game industry
    Traits
    Arrogance • Bias • Bigotry • Bullying • Class warfare • Cronyism • Deceit • Double standard • Denial • Hypocrisy • Journalistic malpractice • Propaganda • Race baiting • Stupidity • Style • Troll • Uncharitableness • Whining
    Other
    Labor Unions • Liberals and friendship • Media elite • George Soros • Liberal quotient • Nihilism • Pornography • Public schools
    Categories: Articles with broken citationsHomosexualityLiberalismHomosexual AgendaLiberal DeceitHollywood Values
    Navigation menu
    Create accountLog inPagetalk pageReadView sourceView history

    Search
    Go
    Main Page
    Recent changes
    Random page
    Statistics
    donate
    PayPal – The safer, easier way to pay online!
    Edit Console
    What links here
    Related changes
    Special pages
    Printable version
    Permanent link
    Page information
    This page was last modified on 19 October 2015, at 21:13.
    This page has been accessed 6,762,996 times.

    • #29 by One truly grateful student at Troy on December 5, 2015 - 10:58 am

      It is so terrible that teenagers would want to be homosexual. It is so horrible that harmful conversion therapies and anti homosexaul practices be outlawed. I would never want to become a homosexual. oh wait. Too late. Oh no. Being gay has been so harmful to those around me. It’s not like I give homosexuals the respect that all humans deserve. Oh no. Its so terrible that public high schools believe that homosexual students deserve to be protected from bigoted idiots who would rather mate with their sisters. This world is so cruel that heterosexual people would have to coexist with homosexuals. It’s not like homosexuality occurs in nature or anythings. ugh.

    • #30 by a dank memer on December 6, 2015 - 9:46 am

      holy fucking shit dude

      • #31 by Anonymous on December 6, 2015 - 11:41 am

        But isn’t that what you are promoting?

  8. #32 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 8:13 am

    On Friday, April 17, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) will have thousands of public high school students, and increasing numbers of middle school students, remain silent throughout an entire school day to promote the militant LGBT agenda among young people.

    “Silence can create change!”GLSEN states on its website, promoting the Day of Silence. “That’s why every year hundreds of thousands of students across the world take a vow of silence on a Friday in April. This quiet but powerful, student-led action raises awareness about the silencing effect of anti-LGBT bullying, harassment and discrimination.”

    GLSEN’s website also asks students to submit “selfies for silence” for publication on the organization’s Facebook, Tumblr, and Twitter pages.

    “We can’t wait to learn about all the incredible ways you are working to end anti-LGBT bullying and harassment and look forward to seeing you connecting across the country through Selfies for Silence,” states GLSEN.

    Many parents, family, and religious organizations, however, are pushing back against government-sponsored infiltration of schools with the sex-and gender-centered social and political philosophy. A national Day of Silence Walkout has been organized; parents are urged to keep their children home from schools if those schools allow students and/or teachers to refuse to speak during instructional time on the Day of Silence.

    GLSEN was founded by gay activist and former Obama administration “Safe Schools Czar” Kevin Jennings, who currently serves as executive director of the Arcus Foundation, a powerful LGBT activist organization that aided President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign as a top bundler. Arcus, founded by billionaire and heir of the Stryker medical technology company, Jon Stryker, provides “social justice grants” to “support emerging LGBT leaders.”

    Last September, Catholic San Francisco reported “abundant evidence” that the attack against San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone for his decision to speak during the March for Marriage in Washington, D.C., was orchestrated by the leftist Faithful America, which was funded by Stryker’s Arcus Foundation, LGBT activist Tim Gill of Colorado’s Gill Foundation, billionaire George Soros, and the Evelyn & Walter Haas Jr. Fund.

    GLSEN’s website provides K-12 “educator resources” that include an “LGBT-inclusive curriculum” and lesson plans on topics such as how to celebrate “LGBT History Month” in classrooms and “ThinkB4YouSpeak,” a guide to LGBT politically correct language.

    A history and English Language Arts lesson – reportedly aligned with the Common Core standards – is offered on the story of Matthew Shepard, a gay young man who was murdered years ago and who is an icon for militant LGBT groups. The story of Shepard’s murder, however, was debunked two years ago by investigative journalist Stephen Jimenez, who discovered that Shepard was not murdered by a stranger because he was gay, but rather by a fellow drug dealer with whom he often had sex.

    “The explicit purpose of DOS is to encourage sympathy and support for students involved in homosexual and cross-dressing behaviors whose voices have been allegedly silenced by the disapproval of society,” state sponsors of the Day of Silence (DOS) Walkout. “The implicit purpose is to undermine the belief that homosexuality and cross-dressing are immoral. Parents should no longer passively countenance the political usurpation of public school classrooms through student silence.”

    Supporters of the DOS Walkout are encouraging parents to call their children’s middle and high schools to determine if administration and/or teachers will be allowing students to remain silent during instructional time. If students are permitted to be silent when class is in session, parents are urged to have their children remain home from school that day.

    DOS Walkout supporters add:

    One oft-repeated mantra is that the goal of DOS is to keep LGBTQ students safe. The problematic rhetoric of “safety,” however, substitutes speciously for the more accurate term of “comfort.” To suggest that in order for those who self-identify as homosexual or “transgender” to be “safe,” no one may disapprove of homosexual conduct is both absurd and dangerous. If this definition of “safety” were to be applied consistently, virtually all statements of disapproval would be prohibited.

    Supporters of the DOS Walkout include the American Family Association, Concerned Women of America, Faith, Family & Freedom Alliance, Liberty Counsel, and the Coalition of African-American Pastors (CAAP).

    In an interview with Breitbart News, Rev. Bill Owens, president of CAAP, said, “What we would like to say is, instead, this will be a day of silent prayer.”

    “The homosexual agenda intends to brainwash Americans into believing that homosexuality is alright, but it has become cult-like,” he said. “Let’s make it a day of silent prayer to promote Christianity and faith in general. What’s the difference?”

    “Those of us who have our faith should be as vocal as those promoting the LGBT agenda – and they are using the same techniques as the Civil Rights Movement,” Owens added. “In fact, they have hijacked the Civil Rights Movement – a movement they know nothing about.”

    “But this is yet another nail in the coffin of ‘we the people’ if we fail to act,” he continued. “Until we the people join together on the Day of Silence and oppose it, those who support the LGBT political agenda will know they own our youth.”

    GLSEN lists Comcast/NBC, Colgate-Palmolive, Wells Fargo, Johnson & Johnson, Target, JP Morgan Chase, Kellogg’s, CitiBank, McDonald’s, UBS, State Farm Bank, the NBA, Morgan Stanley, Merck, Mattel, MassMutual, IBM, Hewlett Packard, Hilton, HBO, Google, Goldman Sachs, Facebook, and Disney/ABC as some of its corporate sponsors and partners.

  9. #33 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 8:15 am

    Public School LGBT Programs Don’t Just Trample Parental Rights. They Also Put Kids at Risk.
    by Walt Heyer
    within Education, Marriage

    June 8th, 2015

    5114 319 6368

    No matter what well-intentioned teachers and administrators believe, LGBT acceptance programs designed by GLSEN and funded by the CDC are designed to encourage kids to question their gender identity and sexual orientation.

    Through his executive appointments, President Obama has helped expose American schoolchildren to activism that places them at risk.

    On May 19, 2009, a few short months after his inauguration, Obama gave the green light to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan to appoint Kevin Jennings to a top position to influence school policy: the post of Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, also known as the “safe schools czar.” Jennings, a powerful LGBT rights activist who is himself a gay man, was the founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). GLSEN is one of the largest LGBT activist organizations in the nation and is devoted to promoting homosexuality in K-12 schools. Jennings served as “safe schools czar” from 2009-2011.

    Given his connection with the organization, we should not be shocked to discover that GLSEN received a grant from the Centers for Disease Control in 2011 for $1.425 million over five years to promote the LGBT agenda in public schools at taxpayers’ expense. Through these publicly funded in-school programs, kids are being bombarded with the message that same-sex attraction and gender-identity confusion are innate and therefore not changeable.

    Those who design these programs probably believe that they are offering hope to children who may feel different, flawed, or unlovable. They believe that if they affirm children’s LGBT identities as something positive, something that makes up the core of who they are, the children will fare better.

    This is not the case. No matter what well-intentioned teachers and administrators believe, these programs ultimately entail an agenda that hurts kids. The messages these programs send do nothing to combat the tragically high suicide rates among the LGBT community. Data indicate that kids are actually put at risk when schools encourage them to identify themselves as gay or transgender at an early age. For each year children delay labeling themselves as LGBT, their suicide risk is reduced by 20 percent.

    I’m passionate about this issue because I was a trans-kid myself. I know how easy it was for my grandma to manipulate me into thinking I should change genders. Young trans-kids need to know they were not born that way, and that most will no longer have a desire to change genders once they grow into adulthood. Parents need to know that up to 94 percent of school-age kids who identify as transgender will grow out of their desire to change genders as adults—if parents and schools stop encouraging them to internalize and publicize their LGBT identities.

    The Power of Childhood Influences

    I’m not sure we truly understand how easily young people’s thinking about gender identity can be influenced by parents, television shows, and teachers who encourage them to explore new genders. During early childhood development, kids learn gender roles from observation within the family setting, peers, television, and school. They use their imagination, actions, and language to play-act what they see.

    GLSEN capitalizes on the impressionable, imaginative nature of young children by designing and implementing programs for children as young as kindergarten. Consider their toolkit for elementary educations, Ready, Set, Respect! GLSEN knows that the elementary years are a prime opportunity to encourage kids to reject the values of their parents. The handbook outlines a variety of activities that gradually introduce and reinforce the messages that gender is a social construct, that moms and dads are interchangeable, and that anyone who says otherwise is hateful and prejudiced.

    Along with lessons designed to help kindergarten through fifth-graders to “explore the definition of a family and to understand that there are a variety of family structures” and to “challenge their own and other’s [sic] assumptions about gender and gender roles,” the guide recommends a variety of books and videos to help cement the lessons. Asha’s Mums, for example, teaches third- through fifth-graders that “having two mums is no big deal.” An additional discussion guide goes into greater detail about books such as And Tango Makes Three, which is recommended for pre-kindergarten through third-graders:

    This book talk is designed to help students realize that there are different family structures including families led by LGBT parents. This is the true story of Roy and Silo, two male penguins who share a nest like other penguin couples, and who are given an egg in need of nurturing. . . .

    Conclude by telling students that Tango’s family is just one kind of family. Ask them if they think there is a certain number of kinds of families and how they know that. Let students know that through your life you have discovered and met and continue to meet different kinds of families and that you’re not sure there is a certain number of possibilities.

    Other books, such as 10,000 Dresses and My Princess Boy, are listed as resources to help children who are “Exploring Non-Traditional Gender Roles.” While parts of the lesson plans are correct and even healthy (yes, girls can climb trees and boys can play with dolls), encouraging cross-gender identification at such a young age can have painful, long-lasting consequences. Inadvertently manipulating the minds of young people by suggesting that their “real” gender might not match their body can shape how they think, feel, and behave for years to come.

    As someone whose grandmother lavished me with affirmations as she cross-dressed me as a girl, I am concerned by the growing trend in schools of encouraging kids to change genders. The activists have convinced the parents this will do no harm. I have traveled this path, and I can tell you: childhood influences matter.

    Events and “Research”

    GLSEN website provides an LGBT inclusive curriculum to help educators develop lessons that include “positive representations of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people, history, and events.”

    The GLSEN student calendar for grades six through twelve is full of events and suggestions for how to celebrate them: LGBT History Month, LGBT Pride Month, National Coming Out Day, and Ally Week, which is touted as “a week where we can have vital conversations to move the movement forward toward our collective queer liberation!”

    What other external organizations are granted access to shaping school curricula and activities? I would venture to say that GLSEN is one of the most provocative. Parents take note: the organization aided by taxpayer funds and influencing schools is the one devoted to the LGBT cause.

    In order to justify the need for LGBT curricula, clubs, and programs to be included in the classroom, GLSEN often cites the National School Climate Survey, which they conduct every two years. References to the survey are peppered throughout their educator’s guides, student programs and campaigns, and press releases, with such phrases as “Research shows . . . ” The problem is: the sampling is flawed.

    Basic principles of statistics and probability state that generalizations about a population from a sample are valid only if the sample is representative of that population. Random sampling is the best way to do that. Read the survey and it’s obvious that the sampling is not random and not representative of US students. In fact, it is a “self-selected” sample, which means that anyone can elect to take the survey, which is freely available on their website. For example, a transgender man in his seventies can fill out the survey posing as a student, which I did to illustrate how flawed the selection process is. The problem of self-selection is that such polls are biased toward people with strong opinions.

    Politics, Bullying, and the Science of Sexual Orientation

    These problematic school programs are both a symptom and a cause of our culture’s continuing confusion about gender and sexuality. When it comes to the nature of sexual identity and orientation, scientific studies with findings that run contrary to the party line are squelched or dismissed out of hand. Researchers who dare to follow where the data lead and to question existing premises are lambasted and risk being professionally marginalized.

    One example of this is the bullying of Dr. Robert Spitzer, a leading figure in the study of homosexuality. Spitzer’s work was embraced and celebrated by LGBT rights activists until he authored a study in 2003 called Can Some Gay Men and Lesbians Change Their Sexual Orientation? 200 Participants Reporting a Change from Homosexual to Heterosexual Orientation. The study abstract finishes with the line: “Thus, there is evidence that change in sexual orientation following some form of reparative therapy does occur in some gay men and lesbians.”

    Here was a case of a prominent scientist following his curiosity, challenging position statements about reparative therapy (also known disparagingly as “conversion therapy”) made by major mental health organizations in the United States, and publishing the objective results of what he found. For this, he was attacked mercilessly. After nearly a decade of public, personal, and professional assault, eighty-year-old Spitzer recanted his views in May 2012 and issued a letter of apology to the gay community.

    Now, President Obama is advocating a ban on psychotherapy that suggests sexual orientation and the desire to change genders are themselves changeable. His administration has issued this statement: “As part of our dedication to protecting America’s youth, this Administration supports efforts to ban the use of conversion therapy for minors.”

    More research needs to be done into the nature of sexual orientation and sexual identity. However, current research suggests that by intervention and encouragement, school programs designed by LGBT rights activists are encouraging children to self-identify in ways that are harmful to their psychological well-being. Rather than allowing the scientific community the space to objectively study these issues, and giving members of the psychiatric profession room to respond to the freely stated needs of the children who come to them, politicians who are hungry for public approval are zealously working to outlaw appropriate and effective psychotherapies for kids who want them.

    It’s Time to Protect Our Kids

    I understand the impulse that probably motivates many people to encourage young children to embrace an LGBT identity. After a lifetime of feeling like “a woman trapped in a man’s body,” I underwent gender reassignment surgery and lived as a woman for years. I was convinced that this was the right decision, and that this was an option that everyone should have for the sake of their happiness and psychological well-being.

    I was wrong. My gender change only brought temporary relief; it did nothing to combat my underlying psychological disorder. My suffering brought me close to suicide. Years after my gender change, I underwent traditional therapy and successfully restored my masculinity and my sanity. Effective psychotherapy and my faith proved to me that changing genders is not a medical necessity.

    I have written extensively about the lack of evidence that changing genders is medically necessary. What I didn’t expect was for the State of California to agree with me. On May 5, California officials asked a federal court to block a judge’s order that the state provide sex-reassignment surgery for a prisoner. The state officials argued that “no treating physician has ever determined that reassignment surgery is medically necessary [for the prisoner in question].”

    The State of California is willing to argue for protecting a prisoner from unnecessary surgery, but the same state is unwilling to step in and protect the personal privacy of non-transgender school children in restrooms and locker rooms. With Assembly Bill 1266, California became the first state in the nation to require public schools to allow transgender students to use restrooms and participate on sports teams matching the gender with which they identify, rather than their biological sex.

    Homosexuals and transgendered people, like all other citizens, should be protected by law from violence and abuse. But that doesn’t change the principle that parents should have access to public education for their children that does not push an ideological sexual and political agenda based on a vision of the human person that many parents deeply disagree with, especially when significant evidence suggests that the messages embedded in these school programs can be harmful to children.

    Control of schools should belong to parents, not to the federal government and activist organizations such as GLSEN.

    Walt Heyer is an author and public speaker with a passion to help others who regret gender change. Through his website, SexChangeRegret.com, and his blog,WaltHeyer.com, Heyer raises public awareness about the incidence of regret and the tragic consequences suffered as a result. Heyer’s story can be read in novel form in Kid Dakota and The Secret at Grandma’s House and in his autobiography, A Transgender’s Faith. Heyer’s other books include Paper Genders and Gender, Lies and Suicide.

  10. #34 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 8:16 am

    Teenagers at a California high school were publicly shamed for disagreeing with speakers allowed to push an LGBT agenda during an English class, according to several upset parents.

    The Queer Straight Alliance at Acalanes High School, in Lafayette, lectured students in several ninth-grade English classes on Jan. 29 about LGBT issues, according to Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, which is representing the parents.

    During the class, the students, ages 14 and 15, were instructed to stand in a circle. Then, they were grilled about their personal beliefs and their parents’ beliefs on homosexuality, PJI alleges.

    “The QSA had students step forward to demonstrate whether they believed that being gay was a choice and whether their parents would be accepting if they came out as gay,” PJI attorney Matthew McReynolds said. “Students who did not step forward were ridiculed and humiliated.”

    CLICK HERE TO FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK FOR CONSERVATIVE CONVERSATION

    PJI is a law firm that specializes in religious liberty cases. They are representing several families who had children in the freshman classes — some of whom also are angry because there was no parental notification of the LGBT lecture.

    “Singling out students for ridicule based on their moral or political beliefs is a Marxist tactic that should have no place in the United States of America,” Dacus said.

    During the lecture, the Queer Student Alliance provided students with the names of the gay and lesbian teachers at the high school. They also had students line up to demonstrate where they fell on the “gender spectrum.”

    “It was an exercise in gender fluidity,” the parent of one child told me. “They told the students that one day they could come to school feeling like a boy and the next day they could come to school feeling like a girl.”

    Students were given a handout with LGBT terminology – including words like pan-sexual, demi-boy and gray gender.

    Demi-boy/girl is defined as someone who only partially identifies as a man or woman. Gray gender defines someone who feels as though they sort of fit inside the gender binary, but that their gender is more hazy and undefined.

    “Acalanes High School and the district have defied common sense, ignored the law and broken parents’ trust,” McReynolds said in a prepared statement. “These administrators are acting like schoolyard bullies. If they think intimidation is going to work on us or these parents, they are greatly mistaken.”

    “It was a public outing,” one parent told me. “My child is being raised in a family with conservative values. We are a Christian family. What bothers me the most is the school is being dishonest and secretive about what’s happening. My son’s value system and our belief system is not being respected on a many levels.”

    And from a very practical point – she wants to know why the Queer Student Alliance was allowed to take over an English class.

    “There’s no other club at the high school that gets face time in front of freshman English classes for an entire period,” the parent said.

    So why is Acalanes High School outing students who may not agree with every facet of the LGBT agenda?

    Superintendent John Nickerson tells me it’s all about tolerance.

    “The classroom instruction in question was part of a tolerance workshop led by peer educators under the supervision of teachers,” Nickerson wrote to me in an email.

    That’s all well and good – but were the teenagers academically qualified to teach a class on issues like “gender fluidity”? Why weren’t the teachers teaching the class? And what about the allegations that students were bullied by the Queer Student Alliance?

    “We are aware of the concerns and allegations raised by two parents and the Pacific Justice Institute,” he wrote. “We are investigating the situation, learning activities and classroom environment.”

    This happens to be the same high school that invited a “pleasure activist” from Planned Parenthood to teach sex education to the freshman class. Students were encouraged to ask each other questions like “Is it okay if I take my pants off?”

    The parent I spoke to bristled at the notion the LGBT class was about tolerance.

    “They are tolerant of everyone except people who have Christian values,” she told me.

    PJI sent a letter to the school district demanding an explanation of what happened. They believe the classroom lecture violated the privacy rights of the students.

    “It should be self-evident that, as a fundamental privacy right, students cannot be ‘outed’ during class time by being made to declare their beliefs and feelings about sensitive sexual matters, any more than a student could be required to announce their sexual orientation,” PJI wrote in their letter to the school district.

    Has it really come to this, America – forcing students to declare their allegiance to the LGBT agenda? Maybe they should just stick to teaching English in English class.

    Todd Starnes is host of Fox News & Commentary, heard on hundreds of radio stations. His latest book is “God Less America: Real Stories From the Front Lines of the Attack on Traditional Values.” Follow Todd on Twitter@ToddStarnes and find him on Facebook.

  11. #35 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 8:17 am

    Obama Forces Gay Agenda on Schools via Taxpayer$$
    With virtually zero notice to parents, the Fairfax County (Virginia) School Board suddenly voted Thursday night to fully embrace the transgender/cross-dressing tenets of the Gay Agenda regarding both employees and students, meaning that all formerly private restrooms and locker rooms will be fair game for “any and all genders.”
    “The Office of Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Education is requiring that school divisions revise their non-discrimination policies to include gender identity.”
    — Deputy Superintendent Steven Lockard, Fairfax County Public Schools

    “The decision by the Fairfax County School Board to add ‘gender identity’ to our nondiscrimination policy is to provide an environment which promotes equality where every student and employee is treated with dignity and respect.”
    — Chair Tammy Derenak Kaufax, Fairfax County School Board
    UPDATE 10/13/15: Illinois School Risks Losing $6M by Rejecting Obama Gay Agenda

    UPDATE 7/1/15: Fairfax Schools Adds Transgender Indoctrination to Sex Education Curriculum

    For background, read how Schools Across America OK Boys in Girls’ Showers as “transgender rights” are being forced into public schools as the Obama Administration Expands Title IX Interpretation to Advance the Gay Agenda.

    Also, click headlines below to read previous articles:

    Male Teacher Suddenly Female, Shocks California Parents

    Supreme Court Opens Girl’s Room to Grown Men in Maine

    Kindergartners Taught Sex Change in Maine School

    Also read President Obama Floods Gay Agenda with Taxpayers’ Money

    UPDATE 9/29/15 – President Obama Speech: Gay Agenda Trumps Christianity

    — From “Fairfax school board approves transgender protections” T. Rees Shapiro, education reporter, Washington Post 5/7/15

    The School Board voted 10 to 1 with one abstention to add “gender identity” to its non-discrimination policy, two months after Virginia Attorney General Mark R. Herring (D) issued an opinion granting local school boards the authority to expand protections to transgender people.

    The School Board voted in November to include sexual orientation in its non-discrimination policy after the Supreme Court let stand rulings that allow gay marriages in Virginia and other states. (emphasis added)

    The auditorium at Luther Jackson Middle School was filled to capacity, with about 500 people in attendance. At times, the meeting was interrupted by vocal opposition from hundreds in the audience who chanted and booed.

    Kaufax at one point hammered her gavel and threatened to clear the auditorium if audience members continued to interject. At least five Fairfax County police and school security officers were standing in the room during the meeting. Some in attendance stood to turn their backs on board members as they spoke in favor of the policy change.

    To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

    So, now tell me again how somebody else’s “gay marriage” won’t affect my marriage or my family.

    From “School district adds gender identity to non-discrimination policy” by Garrett Haake, WUSA-TV9 (Washington, D.C.), USA Today Network 5/8/15

    The approved [non-discrimination] policy now reads:
    “No student, employee, or applicant for employment in the Fairfax County Public Schools shall, on the basis of age, race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, national origin, marital status, or disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity, as required by law. It is the express intent of the School Board that every policy, practice, and procedure shall conform to all applicable requirements of federal and state law.”
    To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

    From “Fairfax Co. school board approves change to policy to protect transgender students, staff” by Alexandra Limon and Tom Fitzgerald, WTTG-TV5 (Washington, D.C.) 5/7/15

    The school board held its vote during a heated and contentious public hearing Thursday night at Luther Jackson Middle School in Falls Church. People were fired up on both sides with screaming and shouting during the meeting. It got so bad that the board threatened to kick everyone out while police and security even showed up.

    The supporters pushing for this change said they are doing this not because of an outcry for it from their community, but because of a mandate by the U.S. Department of Education in Washington.

    Fairfax County School Board Chair Tamara Derenak Kaufax said in a statement after the vote:
    “On March 4, 2015, Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring said local school boards have the authority under state law to include gender identity in their non-discrimination policies. The U.S. Department of Education has told school districts that transgender students are protected from discrimination under Title IX and has recently required some school districts including Alexandria, Virginia, to amend their policies to expressly include gender identity.”
    To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

    From “Feds Force ‘Gender Equality’ On Virginia School District” by Josh Fatzick, Reporter, Daily Caller 5/8/15

    Many parents [at the Board meeting] were concerned the new rules will allow boys and girls who identify as the opposite sex to use the bathrooms and locker rooms of their choice, and that the school board is rushing the decision without asking for their input.

    Efforts to add the language to the school’s nondiscrimination policy began in March as a way to help transgender students and staff in the schools feel more welcome, but some are calling it simply government overreach.

    According to Andrea Lafferty of the Traditional Values Coalition, a religious advocacy group based in Washington, D.C., the board has been trying for weeks to pass the policy change, but only informed parents it would be voting on the change two days before the meeting.

    “The School Board is showing a glaring disregard for the interests of the majority of parents with children in the county’s public schools,” she said in a statement.”No public hearing was ever held, just two brief 30 minute testimony periods and then ‘Bingo!’, the School Board will vote.”

    To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

    From “Some Fairfax Co. Parents Protesting Vote on Transgender Students” by David Culver, Northern Virginia Bureau, WRC-TV4 (Washington, D.C.) 5/8/15

    The vote was last night, but some Fairfax County parents say their campaign is not over.

    The vote came after testimony from an equal number of parents on each side of the issue — but in a room that was packed with parents who opposed it.

    “Right there in front of us were our representatives that were voted by our people,” [parent Arlinda] Hanna said. “And they completely shut the doors on us.”

    One board member voted against the measure, wanting to delay it instead: Elizabeth Schultz.

    “The question is, what message do we send parents?” Schultz said. “That we want your taxpayer dollars, we want you to participate in the PTA, we want you to participate in fundraisers, we want you to volunteer in the schools — but then we want you to go away?”

    She said she has gotten many emails from parents thanking her for her stand.

    To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

    From “School district says feds forced policy that allows transgender kids to use bathrooms of their choice” by Todd Starnes, FOX News 5/7/15

    A plan to add “gender identity” to a Virginia school’s nondiscrimination policy has enraged parents and preachers . . . of the nation’s tenth largest school district . . .

    Martin Baker, the pastor of Burke Community Church, warned that “the damage and destruction to our children, teens and impacted adults will be incalculable.”

    “Everything from locker rooms to bathrooms will be potentially open for people who simply feel that their inner sexuality does not match their outer, physical sexuality,” he wrote in an email to the 3,000-member congregation.

    “This is not just shocking, it is morally and spiritually abhorrent, and that is why I am convinced this is one cultural issue where we, as a church, must speak up and out with clarity, compassion and conviction,” he added.

    “This is a beating into submission of the American people and the taxpayers by the Obama Administration and those willfully going along with it,” said [Andrea] Lafferty. “They are going to say if you don’t comply, we’re going to take away your lunch money – your federal funding.”

    In Fairfax County, that amounts to a lot of lunch money. The Washington Post reports the district receives $42 million from the federal government – about 1.7 percent of its budget.

    To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

    Also read Pastors Lead Local Battles Against ‘Gay Rights’

    And read Christian College Wins Title IX Transgender Dorm Complaint

    Most importantly, read Transgenderism is a ‘Delusion’ According to Victim

  12. #36 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 8:17 am

    STUDENTS TAUGHT ABOUT HOMOSEXUAL FOREPLAY DISGUISED AS TOLERANCE

    This is what happens when you turn educating our youth over to special interest groups. Can you imagine a group called PRYSM, Proud Rainbow Youth of Southern Maine, being in charge of telling your children about diversity and tolerance? Story via HeterosexualAwarenessMonth.com:

    Students Taught about Homosexual Foreplay Disguised As Tolerance
    A school district in Maine is apologizing after middle school students learned about homosexual foreplay during what was supposed to be a “Diversity Day” presentation

    “I don’t want my child taught heterosexual foreplay, let alone homosexual foreplay,” said an outraged parent Kristy Howard.

    The principal of Gorham Middle School sent a letter to parents apologizing for the graphic nature of the presentation by PRYSM, Proud Rainbow Youth of Southern Maine.

    “They went beyond the scope of our intentions and discussed topics that we do not deem appropriate for our middle school,” Robert Riley wrote in a letter obtained by The American Journal. “We do not intend to expose them to ideas that are not within the scope of our teaching about responsible citizenship as it is embedded in our code of conduct.”

    The incident occurred two weeks before the state voted to approve gay marriage – and involved a classroom of 25 eighth graders.

    Howard’s 13-year-old son was one of those who came home shocked by the presentation’s graphic nature.

    “They were talking about sex and if you didn’t have a condom – saran wrap could be used in place of a dental dam,” Howard told Fox News. “It was all new to me.”

    Howard said the PRYSM presenters also cursed and questioned whether the children had been taught about safe homosexual sex.

    One parent relates her frustration about why teachers didn’t step in to stop this:

    James Hagen, chairman of the school committee, told The American Journal that teachers felt uncomfortable about the presentation and reported it to the principal.

    “Teachers were in such shock,” he told the newspaper. “Everyone just froze.”

    Principal Riley defended the way the teacher’s handled the situation – noting that the conversation about gay foreplay happened near the end of the presentation.

    “I think if it had gone longer, they would have intervened,” he told Fox News.

    He said the school is taking steps to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

    “This particular day didn’t have anything to do with sex. It had everything to do with tolerance and kindness and trying to eradicate from our building the idea that it’s okay to be mean to each other,” he said.

    Howard said the fact that teachers did not intervene was incredibly disturbing.

    “It was a gay diversity class that was supposed to teach tolerance,” she said “When it got further than that somebody in the room should have stopped it.”

    Bob Emrich, of Protect Marriage Maine, said he wasn’t surprised by the content of the so-called “diversity” class.

    “Homosexual activists rarely advertise that they are going to indoctrinate children to their point of view,” he said in a statement. “It’s done under the radar, through mandatory ‘diversity, anti-bullying and tolerance’ lessons.”

    “If there was any doubt that gay marriage would be taught to young children in Maine schools just as it is in Massachusetts and Canada, that doubt should be removed now,” he said. “If they are willing to teach our kids how homosexuals engage in foreplay, do you really think they won’t force gay marriage instruction of young children when it is the law of the land?”

    Now, parents across the town have been forced to have some unusual conversations with their children.

    “It did create conversation in our home that technically we wouldn’t have had,” Howard said. “My child knows his identity.”

    She’s also informed her son that contrary to what PRYSM said, saran wrap should only be used to protect food.

    “I’ve had to let him know that no matter what situation he gets in – my suggestion is not saran wrap,” she said. “My suggestion is to abstain altogether.”

    Abstinence was not mentioned in the class.

    She plans on airing her concerns at tonight’s school committee meeting.

    “We’ve gotten away from reading, writing and math,” she said. “We’re graduating children that can’t read.”

    But at least in Gorham, they know what to do with saran wrap.

  13. #37 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 8:34 am

  14. #38 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 8:35 am

  15. #39 by Cheney's dream? on December 5, 2015 - 8:39 am

    Is it just me or is something really in the perverted wind of this country? I turn on the TV and suddenly on a soap I have watched decades, a character who has been on there for a few years is suddenly a transgender. I watch a Sunday show on PBS, “Calling the Midwife,” and suddenly a supposedly happily married man sexually approaches a stranger in a man’s restroom. Some of my favorite shows, like “CSI” have gay characters, and the list goes on. ABC-Disney is making a sitcom about the life of a gay man, Dan Savage, who is one of the nastiest-mouthed human beings out there.

    How can 4% of the population control 80% of the viewing?

    I saw a couple of years ago that Obama’s senior adviser Valerie Jarrett went to Hollywood and demanded changes. A few months ago, Ulsterman wrote that Jarrett was overheard in OUR White House bragging they have so much more to do to us…. Our viewing choices are shrinking daily. Not to mention the sad world we are leaving the children.

    Indeed, how can such a small percentage of the population — the percentage of self-identified LGBTs in the U.S. population actually is less than 2% — control so much of entertainment, the media, and pop culture?

    Here’s how.

    Ever heard of the Gay Mafia? This is Wikipedia’s definition:

    The “Gay Mafia” and “Velvet Mafia” are typically associated with the upper echelons of the fashion and entertainment industries, and the terms are also used humorously by gay people themselves. The term was widely used in the 1980s and 1990s, and could often be seen in the pages of the New York Post…. “Lavender Mafia” refers to the perceived homosexual elements of life within the Catholic church.

    But Wikipedia doesn’t go far enough because the word “mafia” is undefined. This is how the Oxford Dictionaries defines “mafia”:

    An organized international body of criminals, operating originally in Sicily and now especially in Italy and the US and having a complex and ruthless behavioral code.
    Any organized group using extortion and other criminal methods.
    A closed group of people in a particular field, having a controlling influence.
    Clearly, definition no. 1 is not appropriate for the Gay Mafia because it’s not about Sicily or Italians. Definitions nos. 2 and 3 are more appropriate. The term “Gay Mafia” therefore may be defined as:

    An organized group of homosexuals who use extortion and other illicit methods to exert a controlling influence over a particular industry or field.

    The Gay Mafia can be found in at least three industries or fields: the media; Hollywood; and the Catholic Church.

    1. GAY MAFIA IN THE MEDIA
    Ever heard of an organization called the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA)?

    Logo of National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association

    According to the NLGJA’s web site:

    The National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA) is an organization of journalists, media professionals, educators and students who work within the news industry to foster fair and accurate coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues. NLGJA opposes all forms of workplace bias and provides professional development to its members.

    Wikipedia says the NLGJA, based in Washington, D.C., was founded in 1990. It currently has about 700 members in the U.S. and abroad, primarily journalists and students in print, broadcast, and online media.

    The NLJGA exerts its influence over journalism and the media in the following ways:

    From its inception, NLJGA hosts an annual convention inviting their members to participate in top-level training sessions, thought-provoking discussions, and social and professional networking events.
    The organization’s most noteworthy tangible contribution to the journalism industry is the NLGJA Stylebook Supplement on LGBT Terminology — a guide used by journalists when writing about the LGBT “community.”
    “Sexual orientation in the workplace” seminars, offered free of charge to news organizations, provides an LGBT-friendly office environment for homosexual journalists, and pushes for domestic partnership benefits at newspapers across the nation.
    The seminars evolved into the Newsroom Outreach Project — meetings with broadcast, print and online newsroom leaders across the country on correct terminology and treatment of LGBT in the workplace.
    Rapid Response Task Force is a team of LGBT journalists who address any news piece that readers report as being offensive or inaccurate and inform writers and readers of the correct terminology.
    Student outreach via the NLGJA Student Central website, which provides support to young journalists in their early years with scholarships and internships, online networking opportunities, articles about LGBT issues in journalism, student project opportunities, NLGJA membership information, and links to online resources.
    The video below is about a NLGJA fundraiser on April 16, 2015 in New York City’s Prince George Ballroom which featured an auction of items of the Chippendale male strippers. Attendees included ABC’s Meredith Viera (who was the main speaker), CNN president Jeff Zuckerman, and other media stars from the big networks CNN, MSNBC and Fox News.

    The video’s narrator, news media watchdog Accuracy In Media (AIM) editor Cliff Kincaid, says that the NLGJA is subsidized by the media on both the left and the so-called right (Fox). According to the UK’s Digital Spy, in 2006, CNN donated $100,000 (!) to the NLGJA.

    Kincaid warns that the next phase of NLGJA’s media campaign is paving the way for America’s acceptance of “transgendered rights,” and after that, of the sado-masochistic “leather community.”

    WND also warns about a coming “media blitz” to “normalize transgenderism.” Former Olympian champion Bruce Jenner’s “I’m a woman” coming-out as a male-to-female transgender on last Friday’s ABC primetime special with Dianne Sawyer is only the beginning.

    2. GAY MAFIA IN HOLLYWOOD
    That there’s a powerful homosexual clique in the entertainment industry is no secret. Perhaps the most infamous “outing” of Hollywood’s Gay Mafia was that by former Hollywood powerhouse Michael Ovitz, “the man who once was king.” In 2002, in a series of interviews with Vanity Fair magazine’s Bryan Burrough, Ovitz blamed his downfall on the vicious backstabbing by Hollywood’s Gay Mafia.

    Note: Ovitz is a Hollywood talent agent who co-founded Creative Artists Agency (CAA) in 1975 and served as its chairman until 1995, after which he briefly was president of the Walt Disney Company from October 1995 to January 1997.

    According to Burrough, a “driving factor” in Ovitz’s decision to do the Vanity Fair interviews was his “burning need to name names, to throw light on the shadowy Hollywood cabal he believes did him in. He calls it the Gay Mafia, though several of its ‘members’ aren’t gay, and much of what he says about these men is nasty and unprintable. In Ovitz’s eyes the cabal’s demagogic leader . . . is [David] Geffen, laying waste to all Ovitz held dear, spreading rumors about his family, at the same time he was poisoning the business deals that would have saved AMG [Artists Management Group]—all things Geffen denies.” Geffen’s partners in crime, Ovitz alleges, include former Disney C.E.O. Michael Eisner, the New York Times, and Ovitz’s onetime protégés at the Creative Artists Agency, Bryan Lourd, Kevin Huvane, and Richard Lovett.

    Note: David Geffen is the openly homosexual co-founder, with director Steven Spielberg, of DreamWorks.

    Michael Ovitz, David Geffen, Bernard Weinraub

    According to Ovitz, “David [Geffen] tries to destroy everything close to me. He went after my kids. He spread rumors about them. The guy is totally immoral, and he paints himself like this priest.” The vehicle Geffen repeatedly used to sabotage Ovtiz’s image is New York Times’ Hollywood correspondent Bernard Weinraub, whom Ovitz called the Gay Mafia conspiracy’s town crier and who wrote a list of nasty articles on Ovitz over the years. Ovitz claimed he had twice met with the newspaper’s senior staff, including publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr., but “it’s been no use.” As Ovitz put it, “Geffen comes up with the spin, and Weinraub parrots it back, quoting the same people over and over. There’s no balance in their coverage of me. None. Zero.”

    3. GAY MAFIA IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    Even the Catholic Church has a “lavender mafia” that, while not exerting the kind of power and influence on American culture as the media and Hollywood Gay Mafia, nevertheless works to corrupt the church and undermine its teachings.

    In an article for Life Site News, John Westen describes a 2012 paper written by Polish priest and Ph.D. in Philosophy Fr. Dariusz Oko, “With the Pope Against the Homoheresy,” in which Fr. Oko recounted his discovery of a “huge homosexual underground in the Church.”

    Fr. Oko writes that “I began my work as a struggle against a deadly, external threat to Christianity, but then gradually discovered that the enemy is not only outside the Church, but within it, as well,”

    Archbishop Juliusz Paetz

    Oko reveals his own run in with a homosexual clique in the Roman Catholic Church blocking justice for those abused by homosexual clergy, headed by the homosexual Archbishop Emeritus of Poznań, Juliusz Paetz. Oko learned of the archbishop “from a seminarian who told me, all trembling from emotions and terror, about his having been molested by his own ordinary. He was at a brink of losing faith, as well as mental and spiritual integrity. Our interventions at various levels of Church hierarchy were of no avail, however; we encountered a wall that could not be overcome, even in a case as self-evident as that.” What finally broke through the wall, was “a tremendous commotion in the media and reaching the Pope [Benedict XVI] himself. Otherwise, everything was blocked at lower levels of local or Vatican hierarchy.”

    Describing the formation of homosexual cliques of clergy Fr. Oko says:

    They know well, however, that they may be exposed and embarrassed, so they shield one another by offering mutual support. They build informal relationships reminding of a clique or even mafia, aim at holding particularly those positions which offer power and money.

    When they achieve a decision-making position, they try to promote and advance mostly those whose nature is similar to theirs, or at least who are known to be too weak to oppose them. This way, leading positions in the Church may be held by people suffering from deep internal wounds.

    They may actually achieve a dominating position in many areas of church hierarchy, become a “backroom elite” which actually has tremendous power in deciding about important nominations and the whole life of the Church. Indeed, they may even prove to be too powerful for honest, well-meaning bishops.

    Fr. Oko also wrote about “the fear and confusion of the clergy, particularly in certain dioceses and congregations, when faced with” the topic of homosexuality. The clergy “escape into silence, unable to articulate even elementary statements on the teaching of the Church on the subject. What are they afraid of? Where does that fear in entire groups of mature, adult men come from? They must be afraid of some influential lobby which wields its power and which they may fall into disfavor with.”

    CRUCIFIX SEEN AS POPE ARRIVES TO LEAD GENERAL AUDIENCE AT VATICAN

    Fr. Oko maintains that Pope Benedict XVI was well aware of this subculture within the Church, publicly lamented its “filth” and the damage it had caused, and “made cleansing the Church from homosexual abuse and preventing its reoccurrence in the future one of the priorities of his pontificate. He removed compromised clergymen from their offices with much energy. In the very first months following his election, still in 2005, he had an instruction issued to strictly forbid ordaining untreated homosexuals. The instruction was preceded by a letter sent from the Holy See to bishops around the world, ordering that priests with homosexual tendencies be immediately removed from any educational functions at seminaries.” Later in 2008, the Pope issued a directive forbidding even non-practicing homosexuals from becoming seminarians.

    Ominously, when Fr. Oko wrote his paper in late 2012, he warned that the homolobby “represents the very centre of internal opposition against the Pope” and that Pope Benedict XVI “cannot do it all by himself.” He “needs each and everyone of us. He needs support and healthy preaching in every local Church . . . defending the truth of salvation, no matter how much it should cost us.” Fr. Oko said that “If homolobbyists are allowed to act freely, in a dozen or so years they may destroy entire congregations and dioceses,” resulting in “entire countries and nations” leaving the Church.

    It is the contention of Leo Zagami, author of Pope Francis: The Last Pope?, that Pope Benedict XVI resigned because of the power of the church’s homosexual underground.

    This is what Fr. Oko urges faithful Catholics to do:

    Recognize the priests who are homosexual: Fr. Oko warns that active homosexual priests are “devious” and “masters of camouflage.” Although members of the homolobby are a relatively small group, they often hold key positions (which they are very anxious to achieve), create a close network of relationships and support one another, “which is what makes them dangerous.” One way to recognize them is “by their fruit” (cf. St. Matthew 7:16).
    The homosexual mafia in the Church must be dealt with in a very professional way. We must act like a prosecutor or an officer in the battlefield.
    It is important that we find a large group of people of goodwill to protect us and support what we do. That group should include clergymen, as high in the hierarchy as possible; experts in various fields; archive records specialists; lawyers; policemen; journalists; and as many believers as possible.
    Exchange information, documents, and evidence. The global network of homolobbies and homomafias must be counterbalanced by a network of honest people.
    Make use of the Internet, an excellent tool that makes it possible to create a global community of people concerned about the fate of the Church.
    Be mindful that we are like “sheep sent among wolves,” and so we must be “as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves” (St. Matthew 10:16). We must have the courage to stand up against evildoers, as Christ had the courage to stand up against the Pharisees of his times. “God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but a spirit of power, of love and of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7).
    All interventions should be made with utmost respect and love for every person, including the abuser.
    H/t FOTM’s Glenn47, Maziel, and Mike.

    See also:

    Archeologists find evidence of the obliteration of Sodom-Gomorrah
    Who will stand against the gaystapo?
    Homosexuals join Hillary Clinton 2016 in ‘I’d bottom for Hillary!’ campaign
    Biden: Gay rights take precedence over culture
    LGBT Poison on Network TV
    The 379 Companies Pushing Homo Marriage on the Supreme Court
    Gaystapo strikes again: Chase Bank asks employees to declare loyalty to LGBT

    • #40 by Cheneys dream? on December 5, 2015 - 9:20 am

      SB 777, signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2007, prohibits all public school instruction and every school activity from “promoting a discriminatory bias” against (effectively requiring positive depictions of) transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to schoolchildren as young as five years old. SB 777 means children will be taught their “gender” is a matter of choice. When fully implemented, SB 777 will affect everything on campus — classroom instruction, instructional materials, textbooks, guest speakers, handouts, videos, sex education, drama, music, school assemblies, sports teams, homecoming games, school proms, school clubs, etc. There is no “opt out” for parents.

  16. #41 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 8:44 am

    Clearly not everyone in the homosexual movement is an extremist. Many are solid, law-abiding citizens who make important daily contributions to our society and do not believe in confrontation or hard-line rhetoric. However, many militant homosexuals and their supporters have different beliefs. They have adopted the following tactics with the goal of forcing their beliefs on society:

    eliminating free speech by harassing and attempting to silence anyone who disagrees with them;
    preying on children by indoctrinating and recruiting them into their lifestyle;
    imposing their beliefs on others through activist judges and lawmakers requiring that everyone actively promote homosexuality in every institution (schools, workplace, churches, etc.);
    destroying marriage and undermining the traditional family in order to annihilate any moral standard of behavior;
    intolerance toward anyone who does not willingly submit to their agenda;
    fighting for a discriminatory and unconstitutional double standard of justice by demanding that crimes against homosexuals be punished more severely than the same crimes against heterosexuals through ‘hate crimes’ legislation; and
    deceptively portraying homosexuality as a harmless and victimless behavior.
    The homosexual agenda is based on intolerance of anyone who disagrees with them and is a well-coordinated, well-financed, wide-ranging, intensive effort to infiltrate and influence organizations and society at large in order to spread misinformation with the goal of recruiting children. Click for homosexual quotes.

    Children are the prize to the winners of the cultural war. Those who control what young people are taught and what they experience will determine the future course for our nation. The predominant value system of an entire culture can be overhauled by those with unlimited access to children. Homosexual activists understand very clearly how important children are to their cause.

    Several very interesting special reports on the homosexual movement – information not disseminated by the mainstream media – are available free of charge. There are also excellent organizations which provide information about the homosexual movement, how it affects you, what what you can do about it, which companies push the homosexual agenda and how those who desire to come out of that lifestyle can be helped.

    “Tolerance” is the buzzword and central theme for the homosexual movement. However, few people understand what they really mean by “tolerance” and how they have twisted its meaning to support their agenda. As a result, most do not recognize the threat it poses to us, our children and our freedoms.

    “Tolerance” means simply to recognize and respect other’s beliefs and practices without necessarily agreeing or sympathizing with them. However, when many homosexuals use “tolerance,” they mean going far beyond respecting their rights; they also demand approval, praise and endorsement of their beliefs, values and lifestyle. What other group in this country could demand that? Their attitude and demands are neither fair, right nor constitutional.

    Our children are being bombarded in school with the homosexual version of “tolerance.” In other words, all beliefs are equal, all values are equal, all lifestyles are equal and all truth is equal. This is the basis upon which our children are being indoctrinated by the propaganda that their beliefs and values which they learned in their home are no different from those of a homosexual, or a pornographer, or someone involved in adultery or fornication, etc. Children are being taught that all truth is relative to the individual. Knowing right from wrong doesn’t matter. To say something is right or wrong is not being tolerant. This is today’s “tolerance” pushed by homosexual activists.

    It is clear that the distorted definition of “tolerance” has many dangerous implications, and unless society stands up for what is right, we will increasingly find ourselves with fewer and fewer freedoms. First, if our young people are confused about truth and believe the definition of “tolerance” they are being subjected to, they will not be able to determine right from wrong. In fact, in a national study among youth, it was discovered that children who do not accept an objective standard of truth become: 36% more likely to lie to you as a parent, 48% more likely to cheat on an exam, 2 times more likely to physically hurt someone, 2 times for likely to watch a pornographic film, 3 times more likely to use illegal drugs and 6 times more likely to attempt suicide. It is clear that how our youth think about truth has a definite effect on their behavior and the choices they make.

    Second, our freedom of speech is being taken away little by little every day. We see that happening throughout society. If anyone exercises their Constitutional right of free speech and disagrees with the homosexual agenda, they are met with intolerant hatred, shouted down and called names. Homosexuals attempt to justify their actions by claiming any view different than theirs is ‘intolerant’ (using their definition) and should therefore be repressed.

    Third, with the twisted version of “tolerance” comes a double standard. A few years ago, an “art” show displayed a crucifix, a Christian symbol, suspended in a jar of urine. While it enraged people of faith, it was supported by the homosexual community and others as “art.” However, why is it that displaying a homosexual symbol in a jar of urine would be considered a hate crime? Using the same criteria they use on others, then a crucifix in a jar of urine would also be intolerant and a hate crime.

    The danger and hypocrisy of this distorted version of “tolerance” are clear. What they call “tolerance” is really persecution of anyone who disagrees with them. Our society is based on the free exchange of ideas and if any group is successful at taking that away and silencing the opposition, then we are all less free. What they are doing to others is exactly what they claim others are doing to them! (Josh McDowell Ministry)

    The homosexual lifestyle is extremely unhealthy. First, the standards of behavior among homosexuals are far different than in the heterosexual community in terms of the depravity that is accepted and even expected. Second, the chance of contracting AIDS is significantly higher as well.

    A habit or behavior is deemed unhealthy if it has been proven to have debilitating results. Smoking, drugs, alcohol abuse, overeating and other behaviors all fall into this category. But research has shown that homosexual behavior has the same results: nationally, less than 2% of practicing homosexuals live to age 65. Homosexuality deprives men and women of happiness (ask those who have walked away from that lifestyle) and lends itself to the spread of sexually transmitted diseases like AIDS, etc.

    If the tobacco companies tried to get on a school campus to convince children to smoke, they would never be allowed. If the breweries showed up and tried to convince under-age children to start drinking, parents would be up in arms. If health classes started teaching kids to overeat, or shop classes started teaching students how to build bombs, society would be outraged.

    Yet pro-homosexual groups are encouraged to come to schools and teach young children how nice and normal homosexuality is. Today children are actually being indoctrinated about the benefits of homosexuality, in spite of the fact is has been proven to be an unhealthy lifestyle.

    In October 1999 the Associated Press reported that “Something so unspeakable is said to have taken place in Apartment 1207 that half the neighbors have moved out.” What happened in Apartment 1207 that was so horrific? According to police, two homosexual men gagged 13 year-old Jesse Dirkhising, strapped him face down on a mattress and, while one watched, the other brutally murdered the boy by repeatedly raping him until he died. So why did the Associated Press wait several weeks before running the story, fail to mention that the two men were homosexuals, and then release the story only in local areas? Why didn’t the major news networks make that their lead story and follow it through to see whether the two men are convicted?

    The media yawned and looked the other way when Jesse was murdered. Compare that with the murder of homosexual Matthew Shepard that received front-page coverage for months and well over a thousand articles nationwide. Is the rape and brutal murder of a thirteen year old boy by homosexuals any less tragic? Apparently the major print and TV news organizations think so. Once again the pro-homosexual double standard is clear. This is the climate that “hate crime” legislation fosters.

    The Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network (GLSEN) had their annual conference in Atlanta. Their goal: train the principals, bypass the Bible, and control curriculum. According to the Concerned Women for America, G.L.S.E.N. is targeting Southern schools in particular. And this conference will address that with a host of workshops. Some of those offered include: “How To Train Your School Principals,” “Deflecting Bible Bullets,” and “Integrating Lesbian and Gay Students Into Literature Curriculum.” These are their goals, and their target group starts with kindergarten. (Center for Reclaiming America)

    “Hate crimes” legislation is dangerous to us all for two reasons. First, it allows greater punishment for those who think bad thoughts while committing a crime than those who don’t. It gives the thought police the power to punish people based on what they’re thinking, which is a policy prevalent in communist countries. Criminals should be punished for their actions, not their thoughts. If we start down that road, where do we stop? Who knows, what you’re thinking right now might even be a crime! Second, it assigns greater penalties to those who commit crimes against homosexuals than those who commit crimes against heterosexuals. Not only is that un-American, it is blatantly discriminatory and unconstitutional as well because homosexuals are given greater protection under the law than anyone else. Crimes against homosexuals are just as serious as crimes against heterosexuals, and in either case perpetrators should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but the fundamental principal in America is “equal protection under the law” as stated in the Constitution, instituted to protect all citizens equally against injustice. Click for examples of homosexual intolerance. Also, find out how to intelligently discuss hate crime laws, which are unnecessary and a threat to free speech as well.

    One of the demands of homosexuals is protected class status as a ‘minority.’ Although they want special protection and special rights, being homosexual isn’t the same as being an ethnic minority. We choose our sexual behaviors, not our skin color. Find out why homosexuals are not a minority, but a powerful special interest group. In truth, to equate gays with any true ethnic group is a travesty of logic. Homosexuality can only be equated and compared with other sexual behaviors or fantasies, legal and illegal, like heterosexuality, sadomasochism, bestiality, necrophilia, rape and pedophilia. Why homosexual behavior should merit special treatment is a question gay extremists are hard-pressed to answer logically.

    In addition, homosexuals make the claim that as an entire class they are seriously “oppressed.” However, that conclusion cannot stand when seen in light of marketing studies done by gays themselves that show them to be enormously advantaged relative to the general population, and even more so when compared to truly disadvantaged minorities.

    The homosexual agenda is not an impersonal force. It touches and destroys the lives of real people everyday, like Karen. Her husband announced one day that he was leaving her and their two boys pursue a new “lifestyle” as a “transgendered” female. Today, her ex-husband is living as a woman with a transgendered male and is suing Karen for the custody of their children. Her life has been ruined financially and emotionally. She lost a husband and their children lost a father. She has been threatened with fines and jail, but she is not giving up the fight to save her children from the poison of the homosexual agenda. (Alliance Defense Fund newsletter)
    In 1999, the American Psychological Association (APA) published a report on child sex abuse saying that sexual relations between children and adults are “less harmful than believed” and might actually “be positive for willing children.” How could trained psychologists, let alone anyone in their right mind, suggest that sex between adults and children could be positive for the children? Luckily there was a huge uproar throughout society about this absurd conclusion. As a result the APA backed down and acknowledged that there was a serious problem with the study and that they should have been more careful in publishing the report in the first place. See, you can make a difference! (Family Research Council letter)

    “It’s Elementary” is a pro-homosexual propaganda documentary aimed at children in grade school. The video conveys the message that homosexuality is good and those that disagree are bad. This is the Joe Camel of the homosexual movement. Only unlike Joe Camel that targets teens, this video targets children as young as five or six years old. And unlike cigarettes, there are no warning labels. The 78-minute lesbian-produced documentary shows teachers introducing pupils to homosexuality and urging its acceptance by manipulation, indoctrination, use of trusted authority figures, and peer pressure.

    It’s Elementary is not about simply teaching “tolerance.” Indeed, the president of the National Education Association has declared this himself: “I’m not talking about tolerance,” says Bob Chase in support of the program. “I’m talking about acceptance.” This deceptive program has already made astonishing inroads into America’s educational, political, and media worlds. The film’s producers have bragged about the wide distribution of the film through “an extremely effective grassroots distribution campaign.” According to the producers, It’s Elementary has been shown to state legislators, all grade levels of school teachers and counselors, statewide “school safety” conferences, regional school health provider meetings, PTAs, faculty in over 200 school districts, students from high school through graduate study levels, school administrators, nearly 500 college-level teacher training programs, and many more.

    It’s Elementary includes scenes from a Cambridge school’s “Gay and Lesbian Day” assembly in which teachers profess their homosexuality in front of the students. At another school, a lesbian and a male homosexual visit a social studies class to talk about homosexuality – and, according to the principal, “to be role models for gay students.” Such teaching, says the principal, “should be mandatory.”

    According to Family Research Council’s website, “teacher after teacher in the film present homosexuality as normal and resistance to the lifestyle as bigotry – to children as young as first grade.” Lies about the biblical view of homosexuality appear to be part of the fabric of this film. There is no balance of any other views offered anywhere in the film.

    Some quotes from the video: Debra Chasnoff has this to say about her video, “What’s clear in the film is that the younger the kids, the more open they were. …If we could start doing this kind of education in kindergarten, first grade, second grade, we’d have a better generation.” The principal of an elementary school says on the video: “I don’t think it’s appropriate that values only be taught at home. There are social values as well, there are community values.”

    Amazon.com was planning to make available an “e-Card” mocking the Iwo Jima memorial. The “gay” celebratory card pictured men, including one in high heels, planting a homosexual rainbow flag instead of Old Glory on Mount Suribachi. However, due to public outrage the card has been canceled. Unfortunately, there are other “gay” “e-Cards” still available, including some that mock women with bisexual philandering husbands. A card called “The Bathhouse” has a women telling her friend, “I hope everything’s OK. Tony’s been in the bathhouse for over an hour.” (Washington Watch – Family Research Council)

    Another new pro-homosexual group called Just the Facts Coalition has issued a slick pro-homosexual “fact sheet” which they mailed to every school superintendent in the 15,000 public school districts across the country with the goal that children will be taught to accept and promote homosexuality. This coalition includes the National Education Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Psychological Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of School Psychologists, American Federation of Teachers, American School Health Association, Interfaith Alliance and others.

    The document, entitled “Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation and Youth – A Primer for Principals, Education & School Personnel” is a 12 page booklet which confuses providing a safe environment for all students with saying that homosexuality is good, normal and healthy. They demand that homosexuality be accepted as the moral and legal equivalent of heterosexuality and present their one-sided view. (Traditional Values Coalition)

    Produced at the urging of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), the booklet denigrates groups that help and support people who want to leave the homosexual lifestyle. It incorrectly portrays heterosexuality as a “religious” viewpoint and homosexuality as “scientific.” It warns of potential harm to young people and includes a threat to schools of legal action if they do no censor views which do not agree with theirs. (Impact – Coral Ridge Ministries)

    “This is another attempt by the homosexual lobby to silence any views on homosexuality but its own. The primer does not acknowledge the unhealthy consequences of homosexuality. It presents a one-sided case that promotes homosexuality by advocating censorship for information in schools about the opportunity of individuals to experience a healthy change and leave the homosexual lifestyle.” (Janet Parshall – Family Research Council)

    The real potential for harm here is that this misinformation leaves kids with no way out. They need to hear the truth that there is an alternative to this propaganda. If the homosexual community has nothing to hide and the truth is really on their side, why are they so afraid of other viewpoints and open dialogue? Guard your children from the unhealthy consequences of homosexuality and protect your right of free speech. Call your local school superintendent or school board member and voice your opinion about this harmful booklet.

  17. #42 by Joe Imbriano on December 5, 2015 - 9:08 am

    Troy High School is ground zero for the forced wireless exposure debate
    https://thefullertoninformer.com/apple-666-project-inkwell-and-agenda-21-an-expose-with-an-all-star-cast/

    Troy High School is ground zero for the forced vaccination debate
    https://thefullertoninformer.com/fast-and-furious-fast-tracking-sb-277-forced-sterilization-and-the-death-of-paul-walker/

    and of course the forced homosexual indoctrination debate.
    https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-radical-homosexual-and-forced-vaccination-agendas-advancing-at-fullertons-troy-high-school/

    Welcome to all of you. Everyone’s opinion is welcome.

  18. #43 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 9:18 am

    The Problem Facing California Public School Parents

    What your child is guaranteed in California public schools

    Because of bad laws, lack of pro-family laws, and politically-correct trends, here’s what kids are guaranteed to receive in California public schools:

    1. Homosexual-bisexual-transsexual indoctrination, without parental consent, including off-campus pro-homosexuality counseling. (Scroll down to see the laws.)

    2. Pro-abortion indoctrination, “confidential” abortion referrals and off-campus “counseling”, without parental consent.

    3. Condom/birth control pills indoctrination and distribution without parental consent; no teaching children how to truly avoid STDs; “abstinence-only” education prohibited.

    4. Anti-God, pro-evolution indoctrination.

    5. Political correctness.

    6. Dumbed-down academics, less academic success, on average, than private school or home school.

    7. Negative socialization and peer pressure.

    8. Less safety, on average, than private school.

    9. Anti-Christian indoctrination; widespread rejection of religious and moral values.

    10. Anti-parent sentiments.

    SOLUTIONS HERE: How to rescue your child

    Parents alarmed about homosexual indoctrination laws

    A raft of California laws either are or will eventually require all public school instruction and activities to positively portray transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to children as young as kindergarten. Here’s a summary of these laws:

    AB 1266 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013, requires all K-12 public schools to permit biological boys in girls’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams; and biological girls in boys’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams. The “right” to violate these sexual boundaries is solely a self declaration of a different “gender identity.”

    Passed by the majority Democrats in the California Legislature, AB 1266 tramples parents’ rights and invades the personal comfort zones of millions of California children for a handful of sexually confused children who need professional counseling. Not only is transsexuality unnatural and unhealthy, AB 1266 also opens the door to fraud because there are porn-influenced boys who will try to see girls partially or fully naked by declaring themselves “female” for the day.

    AB 1266 mandates this agenda and permits this abuse, reading, “A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.”

    SB 48 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2011, mandates that children from kindergarten through 12th grade, in all “instruction in social sciences,” admire “the role and contributions of…lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans.” In January 2012, California public school districts must implement the new requirements of SB 48 through “supplemental materials” (i.e., handouts, homosexual biographies, classroom discussions, essays and other homework, outside speakers, videos, dramas, etc.); the printed textbooks will come in a few years. As a result of SB 48, all public school districts in California are under the following orders:

    1) Textbooks and instructional materials must positively promote “lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans” as “role” models;

    2) Children as young as 6 years old will be taught to admire homosexuality, same-sex “marriages,” bisexuality, and transsexuality (cross-dressing and “sex change” operations);

    3) Children will be taught to support the political activism of so-called “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex and Questioning” (LGBTIQ) political groups, as the bill requires “particular emphasis on portraying the role of these groups in contemporary society”;

    4) Teachers will be made to positively portray homosexuality, same-sex “marriages,” bisexuality, and transsexuality, because to be silent can bring the charge of “reflecting adversely” or “promoting a discriminatory bias”;

    5) School boards will be required to select textbooks and other instructional materials that positively portray “LGBT” lifestyles, because to be silent on these subjects opens them up to charges of “reflecting adversely” or “promoting a discriminatory bias”; 6) Parents will not be notified, nor will they be able to exempt their children, from this new core curriculum.

    SB 543 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010, allows school staff to remove children — aged 12 and up — from government schools and taken off-campus for counseling sessions, without parental permission or involvement. The purpose is to permit pro-homosexuality teachers and administrators to remove sexually-confused children in 6th grade and up from campus and take them to pro-homosexuality counselors who will encourage them to embrace the homosexual lifestyle. Parents will never hear about it. The Democrat legislators who voted for it and the homosexual activists who sponsored it regard parents as the problem and parental rights as “a barrier.” SB 543 author Mark Leno, a San Francisco Democrat and homosexual activist, wrote “this barrier is especially harmful to certain populations of youth including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth.”

    ACR 82 (school or district option), approved by the California Legislature in 2010, creates de facto “morality-free zones” at participating schools (pre-kindergarten through public universities). Schools that become official “Discrimination-Free Zones” will “enact procedures” (including mandatory counseling) against students from pre-kindergarten on up who are accused of “hate,” “intolerance,” or “discrimination.” How? By peacefully speaking or writing against the unnatural lifestyles of “sexual orientation” (homosexuality and bisexuality) and “gender identity” (transsexuality and cross-dressing), which are included in this measure. This means students, teachers, and parents who visit campus, who speak up for man-woman marriage, biological gender differences, and Biblical values could be penalized.

    SB 572 (teacher or school or district option), signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2009, establishes “Harvey Milk Day” in K-12 California public schools and community colleges. In classrooms, schools, and school districts that participate, children will now be taught to admire the life and values of late homosexual activist and teen predator Harvey Milk of San Francisco the month of May. According to the reputable biography, “The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk” by Randy Shilts, Milk repeatedly engaged in adult-child sex, advocated for polygamous homosexual relationships, and told a very public lie because he thought it would get him ahead. Since SB 572 requires participating schools to make children perform “exercises remembering the life of Harvey Milk,” kids could be taught to support and emulate these bad values.

    SB 777 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2007, prohibits all public school instruction and every school activity from “promoting a discriminatory bias” against (effectively requiring positive depictions of) transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to schoolchildren as young as five years old. SB 777 means children will be taught their “gender” is a matter of choice. When fully implemented, SB 777 will affect everything on campus — classroom instruction, instructional materials, textbooks, guest speakers, handouts, videos, sex education, drama, music, school assemblies, sports teams, homecoming games, school proms, school clubs, etc. There is no “opt out” for parents. Thus, curriculum and school activities must be positive about homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality, because to be silent could be deemed to be “promoting a discriminatory bias.”

    AB 394 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2007, effectively promotes transsexual, bisexual, and homosexual indoctrination of students, parents, and teachers via “anti-harassment” and “anti-discrimination” materials, to be publicized in classrooms and assemblies, posted on walls, incorporated into curricula on school websites, and distributed in handouts to take home.

    SB 71 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Gray Davis in 2003 and implemented in 2008 through the new “sexual health” standards approved by appointees of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell, teaches children as young as 5th grade that any consensual sexual behavior is “safe” as long as you “protect” yourself with a condom, and teaches children that homosexuality, bisexuality and transsexuality is “normal.”

    AB 1785 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Gray Davis in 2000, required the California State Board of Education to alter the state curriculum frameworks to include and require “human relations education” for children in K-12 public schools, with the aim of “fostering an appreciation of the diversity of California’s population and discouraging the development of discriminatory attitudes and practices,” according to the state legislative counsel’s digest. Unfortunately, the bill defined “culture” and “cultural diversity” to include an unnatural meaning of “sex” or “ gender” (redefined under Government Code, Section 12926(p) and (q), along with Penal Code, Section 422.56(c), producing an overly broad meaning that “includes a person’s gender identity and gender related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the person’s assigned sex at birth.”) and “sexual orientation” (which Penal Code, Section 422 also defines to include all virtually all aspects of homosexuality and bisexuality).

    AB 1785 also required a course on pro-homosexuality-bisexuality-transsexuality “human relations” as a prerequisite for receiving a teaching credential to teach “limited-English-proficient pupils.” And AB 1785 requires public schools to report a new category called “hate-motivated incidents,” which are not defined but declared to be “bigoted insults, taunts, or slurs, distributing or posting hate group literature or posters, defacing, removing, or destroying posted materials or announcements, posting or circulating demeaning jokes or leaflets.” Unfortunately, the subjective meanings and lack of solid definitions mean peaceful speech or literature upholding marriage between one man and one woman, or explaining the documented health risks of homosexuality could be judged “bigoted” or “demeaning,” and thus a reportable “hate-motivated incident” by pro-“LGBT” school administrators. See this news report to learn more about AB 1785.

    AB 537 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Gray Davis in 1999, permits teachers and students to openly proclaim and display their homosexuality, bisexuality or transsexuality, even permitting cross-dressing teachers, school employees and student on campus, in classrooms, and in rest rooms. It’s all being done under the banner of “non-discrimination” on the basis of “sexual orientation” (in all its forms) and “gender” (however subjectively defined).

    SOLUTIONS HERE: How to rescue your child

    What’s more, beyond these school sexual indoctrination laws

    1. There is no California statute prohibiting public school teachers from promoting any legal sexual lifestyle or sexual practice.

    2. Schools can and do hold lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender “diversity day,” “week” or “month.”

    3. Schools can and many do permit the pro-“LGBT” “Day of Silence” every April.

    4. Districts must permit “Gay-Straight Alliance” clubs on high school and junior high campuses. In California, there are more than 850 of these clubs, with a staff sponsor, promoting homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality on campus to the entire student body. In 2011, these “GSA” clubs sponsored “Harvey Milk Day” forced indoctrination. Read more

    “Good public schools” not so good

    Are public schools a “red light zone”? 12% of high schools “dropout factories”
    Study debunks “good schools” myth Government schools increasingly anti-parent
    Calif. public schools among worst Half of Calif. black, Latino students drop out
    Half of LAUSD students drop out How public schools misspend taxpayer money
    Public schools cause “dumb-ification”

  19. #44 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 9:19 am

  20. #45 by Anti Christian Troy ASB president Allen Ortega is a hater on December 5, 2015 - 9:19 am

    Please read this shocking and true account of what happened to highschooler Lauren, in the name of notorious homosexual activist Harvey Milk.

    Here’s the email SaveCalifornia.com received on Monday, May 23 at 4:14 p.m.: You were right our daughter was told she had to attend a gay straight alliance rally to honor Harvey Milk at Moreno Valley High School. She shared she was a christian with the teacher and only after she saw Lauren was clearly upset about going to this rally did she issue her a hall pass. She was persecuted by another student but made it out of the class . I picked her up and she was very upset. How many other Christians were forced to go to this rally? Parents Stand and teach your children to. God Bless and thank you for your work with save California — Deanna Aguirre, Moreno Valley (provided with permission)

    I was saddened, by not surprised, to read Deanna’s message. Even though this concerned mother didn’t hear in time about our boycott of “Harvey Milk Gay Day,” she’s now found SaveCalifornia.com and has signed up for our email updates. Keep reading to find out how “Harvey Milk Gay Day” played out at her daughter’s school.

    16-year-old Lauren’s account of sexual brainwashing in public school

    Harvey Milk “education” during the past two weeks is only the tip of the iceberg of perverse indoctrination happening all over California. Moreno Valley is a conservative area, consistently sending Riverside County Republicans to serve in the state legislature and U.S. Congress. Yet, because this sexual brainwashing is based on state laws, it’s a mandate on all California K-12 government schools, no matter the neighborhood or community. This is despite all the evidence that homosexuality is unnatural and unhealthy.

    I talked with Deanna’s 16-year-old daughter, Lauren, about the Harvey Milk takeover at the government high school she attends. She told me the following:

    When she walked into her U.S. History class Monday, May 23, she saw the words “Gay-Straight Alliance Assembly — Harvey Milk” on the blackboard. Her teacher, obviously a pro-homosexuality agenda sympathizer, told Lauren and every other student walking in to go to the assembly. Lauren protested, but the teacher didn’t listen to her at first. Lauren again said she didn’t want to go, and finally the teacher exempted her, but only her.

    Lauren got out of that one, but her fellow students were corralled into the brainwashing assembly, like cattle going to slaughter, where the homosexual sponsor of the on-campus Gay-Straight Alliance told them how they must support the homosexual-bisexual-transsexual agenda of Harvey Milk. Later, a Muslim classmate told Lauren she wished she had refused to go to the assembly too.

    But three days earlier, it was even worse for Lauren. On Friday, May 20, in her English class taught by the same homosexual teacher who would lead the Harvey Milk assembly, Lauren was made to read out loud to the class an all-positive, one-page biography of Harvey Milk. Lauren’s mother says the teacher seems to pick on her because he knows she’s a Christian.

    Then, the teacher turned off the lights and played several minutes of the R-rated Milk film, which showed two homosexual men in bed together. “I wanted to leave so bad,” Lauren told me. Then, to top off this Harvey Milk “commemorative exercise,” the homosexual activist teacher handed out “Milk Duds” candy, apparently trying to attach a pleasurable sense to his perverse teaching.

    Trampling parental rights

    Parents, realize there was NO advance parental notification of this happening or the opportunity to opt out your children. Even more, realize there was no parent permission sought, no opt-in form to sign. No, Harvey Milk sexual indoctrination, and other sexual indoctrination implemented, because of other perverse laws are being done behind parents’ backs and despite parents’ objections.

    Realize that these “Gay-Straight Alliances” (GSAs are homosexual-bisexual-transsexual agenda clubs) are at many California public high schools (see the list). In May, they actively promoted the perverse Harvey Milk in public schools.

    In addition to government schools nationwide having to permit GSA clubs (as long as any other non-curricular clubs are allowed), every California K-12 government school is under a state mandate to sexually indoctrinate children. See the list of these immoral California laws.

    What you must do

    Because of the raft of mandatory “LGBTIQ” laws — as well as “school options” such as “Harvey Milk Day” and “Day of Silence” — children left in California’s government school system WILL be sexually indoctrinated. You won’t be notified and they certainly won’t ask your permission. Time for a reality check. The only reliable way to opt your child out of this garbage is to permanently opt out of the government school system.

    Parents, you must wake up and embrace the truth. Sexual indoctrination is just part of why government schools have become so bad in the last generation. See the list of problems facing every child in California public schools.

    I challenge you to put on faith and love. In the face of this clear and present danger, you can choose to provide your child the stronger academics, moral values, character development, better socialization, physical safety, and flexible schedule provided by homeschooling. Be encouraged that homeschooling is simpler than ever, with inexpensive curriculum packages that do most of the teaching. And many parents are learning how to prioritize and afford a church school education. Discover how today at our special website, RescueYourChild.com.

    I am afraid that the schools will prove the very gates of hell, unless they diligently labor in explaining the Holy Scriptures and engraving them in the heart of the youth.
    Martin Luther, Protestant Reformer

  21. #46 by Cheneys dream? on December 5, 2015 - 9:21 am

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

    SECTION 1. Section 221.5 of the Education Code is amended to read:
    221.5. (a) It is the policy of the state that elementary and secondary school classes and courses, including nonacademic and elective classes and courses, be conducted, without regard to the sex of the pupil enrolled in these classes and courses.
    (b) A school district may not prohibit a pupil from enrolling in any class or course on the basis of the sex of the pupil, except a class subject to Chapter 5.6 (commencing with Section 51930) of Part 28 of Division 4 of Title 2.
    (c) A school district may not require a pupil of one sex to enroll in a particular class or course, unless the same class or course is also required of a pupil of the opposite sex.
    (d) A school counselor, teacher, instructor, administrator, or aide may not, on the basis of the sex of a pupil, offer vocational or school program guidance to a pupil of one sex that is different from that offered to a pupil of the opposite sex or, in counseling a pupil, differentiate career, vocational, or higher education opportunities on the basis of the sex of the pupil counseled. Any school personnel acting in a career counseling or course selection capacity to a pupil shall affirmatively explore with the pupil the possibility of careers, or courses leading to careers, that are nontraditional for that pupil’s sex. The parents or legal guardian of the pupil shall be notified in a general manner at least once in the manner prescribed by Section 48980, in advance of career counseling and course selection commencing with course selection for grade 7 so that they may participate in the counseling sessions and decisions.
    (e) Participation in a particular physical education activity or sport, if required of pupils of one sex, shall be available to pupils of each sex.
    (f) A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.

  22. #47 by Cheneys dream? on December 5, 2015 - 9:22 am

    A raft of California laws either are or will eventually require all public school instruction and activities to positively portray transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to children as young as kindergarten. Here’s a summary of these laws:

    AB 1266 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013, requires all K-12 public schools to permit biological boys in girls’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams; and biological girls in boys’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams. The “right” to violate these sexual boundaries is solely a self declaration of a different “gender identity.”

    Passed by the majority Democrats in the California Legislature, AB 1266 tramples parents’ rights and invades the personal comfort zones of millions of California children for a handful of sexually confused children who need professional counseling. Not only is transsexuality unnatural and unhealthy, AB 1266 also opens the door to fraud because there are porn-influenced boys who will try to see girls partially or fully naked by declaring themselves “female” for the day.

    AB 1266 mandates this agenda and permits this abuse, reading, “A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.”

    SB 48 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2011, mandates that children from kindergarten through 12th grade, in all “instruction in social sciences,” admire “the role and contributions of…lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans.” In January 2012, California public school districts must implement the new requirements of SB 48 through “supplemental materials” (i.e., handouts, homosexual biographies, classroom discussions, essays and other homework, outside speakers, videos, dramas, etc.); the printed textbooks will come in a few years. As a result of SB 48, all public school districts in California are under the following orders:

    1) Textbooks and instructional materials must positively promote “lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans” as “role” models;

    2) Children as young as 6 years old will be taught to admire homosexuality, same-sex “marriages,” bisexuality, and transsexuality (cross-dressing and “sex change” operations);

    3) Children will be taught to support the political activism of so-called “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex and Questioning” (LGBTIQ) political groups, as the bill requires “particular emphasis on portraying the role of these groups in contemporary society”;

    4) Teachers will be made to positively portray homosexuality, same-sex “marriages,” bisexuality, and transsexuality, because to be silent can bring the charge of “reflecting adversely” or “promoting a discriminatory bias”;

    5) School boards will be required to select textbooks and other instructional materials that positively portray “LGBT” lifestyles, because to be silent on these subjects opens them up to charges of “reflecting adversely” or “promoting a discriminatory bias”; 6) Parents will not be notified, nor will they be able to exempt their children, from this new core curriculum.

    SB 543 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010, allows school staff to remove children — aged 12 and up — from government schools and taken off-campus for counseling sessions, without parental permission or involvement. The purpose is to permit pro-homosexuality teachers and administrators to remove sexually-confused children in 6th grade and up from campus and take them to pro-homosexuality counselors who will encourage them to embrace the homosexual lifestyle. Parents will never hear about it. The Democrat legislators who voted for it and the homosexual activists who sponsored it regard parents as the problem and parental rights as “a barrier.” SB 543 author Mark Leno, a San Francisco Democrat and homosexual activist, wrote “this barrier is especially harmful to certain populations of youth including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth.”

    ACR 82 (school or district option), approved by the California Legislature in 2010, creates de facto “morality-free zones” at participating schools (pre-kindergarten through public universities). Schools that become official “Discrimination-Free Zones” will “enact procedures” (including mandatory counseling) against students from pre-kindergarten on up who are accused of “hate,” “intolerance,” or “discrimination.” How? By peacefully speaking or writing against the unnatural lifestyles of “sexual orientation” (homosexuality and bisexuality) and “gender identity” (transsexuality and cross-dressing), which are included in this measure. This means students, teachers, and parents who visit campus, who speak up for man-woman marriage, biological gender differences, and Biblical values could be penalized.

    SB 572 (teacher or school or district option), signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2009, establishes “Harvey Milk Day” in K-12 California public schools and community colleges. In classrooms, schools, and school districts that participate, children will now be taught to admire the life and values of late homosexual activist and teen predator Harvey Milk of San Francisco the month of May. According to the reputable biography, “The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk” by Randy Shilts, Milk repeatedly engaged in adult-child sex, advocated for polygamous homosexual relationships, and told a very public lie because he thought it would get him ahead. Since SB 572 requires participating schools to make children perform “exercises remembering the life of Harvey Milk,” kids could be taught to support and emulate these bad values.

    SB 777 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2007, prohibits all public school instruction and every school activity from “promoting a discriminatory bias” against (effectively requiring positive depictions of) transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to schoolchildren as young as five years old. SB 777 means children will be taught their “gender” is a matter of choice. When fully implemented, SB 777 will affect everything on campus — classroom instruction, instructional materials, textbooks, guest speakers, handouts, videos, sex education, drama, music, school assemblies, sports teams, homecoming games, school proms, school clubs, etc. There is no “opt out” for parents. Thus, curriculum and school activities must be positive about homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality, because to be silent could be deemed to be “promoting a discriminatory bias.”

    AB 394 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2007, effectively promotes transsexual, bisexual, and homosexual indoctrination of students, parents, and teachers via “anti-harassment” and “anti-discrimination” materials, to be publicized in classrooms and assemblies, posted on walls, incorporated into curricula on school websites, and distributed in handouts to take home.

    SB 71 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Gray Davis in 2003 and implemented in 2008 through the new “sexual health” standards approved by appointees of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell, teaches children as young as 5th grade that any consensual sexual behavior is “safe” as long as you “protect” yourself with a condom, and teaches children that homosexuality, bisexuality and transsexuality is “normal.”

    AB 1785 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Gray Davis in 2000, required the California State Board of Education to alter the state curriculum frameworks to include and require “human relations education” for children in K-12 public schools, with the aim of “fostering an appreciation of the diversity of California’s population and discouraging the development of discriminatory attitudes and practices,” according to the state legislative counsel’s digest. Unfortunately, the bill defined “culture” and “cultural diversity” to include an unnatural meaning of “sex” or “ gender” (redefined under Government Code, Section 12926(p) and (q), along with Penal Code, Section 422.56(c), producing an overly broad meaning that “includes a person’s gender identity and gender related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the person’s assigned sex at birth.”) and “sexual orientation” (which Penal Code, Section 422 also defines to include all virtually all aspects of homosexuality and bisexuality).

    AB 1785 also required a course on pro-homosexuality-bisexuality-transsexuality “human relations” as a prerequisite for receiving a teaching credential to teach “limited-English-proficient pupils.” And AB 1785 requires public schools to report a new category called “hate-motivated incidents,” which are not defined but declared to be “bigoted insults, taunts, or slurs, distributing or posting hate group literature or posters, defacing, removing, or destroying posted materials or announcements, posting or circulating demeaning jokes or leaflets.” Unfortunately, the subjective meanings and lack of solid definitions mean peaceful speech or literature upholding marriage between one man and one woman, or explaining the documented health risks of homosexuality could be judged “bigoted” or “demeaning,” and thus a reportable “hate-motivated incident” by pro-“LGBT” school administrators. See this news report to learn more about AB 1785.

    AB 537 (mandatory), signed by Gov. Gray Davis in 1999, permits teachers and students to openly proclaim and display their homosexuality, bisexuality or transsexuality, even permitting cross-dressing teachers, school employees and student on campus, in classrooms, and in rest rooms. It’s all being done under the banner of “non-discrimination” on the basis of “sexual orientation” (in all its forms) and “gender” (however subjectively defined).

  23. #48 by Troy Student on December 5, 2015 - 10:14 am

    I couldn’t help but notice how poorly written this article was. At least at Troy we know the difference between “its” and “it’s.” Yes, I’m looking at you, sentence two of paragraph two. Do you guys have an editor, or was he “drugged” by the Troy alumni? You should come to Troy and take a look at our newspapers. You’d learn quite a bit.

    • #49 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 11:57 am

      You should work on developing critical thinking skills, wholly absent in the Oracle articles.

      Don’t worry, as long as Ms. Cheney favors you, that glowing college recommendation will be forthcoming.

  24. #50 by A Troy Student on December 5, 2015 - 10:24 am

    It appalls me that you adults are disrespecting our former ASB President. Everyone can have differing and dissenting opinions. However, it is extremely rude and disrespectful for you to accuse and target students, faculty, and others who do not agree with you.

    • #51 by Change of heart? on December 5, 2015 - 11:29 am

      “However, it is extremely rude and disrespectful for you to accuse and target students, faculty, and others who do not agree with you”.

      Former ASB Presidents and faculty are adults now. At least on paper.

      • #52 by Change of heart on December 5, 2015 - 6:44 pm

        • #53 by moral turpitude on December 5, 2015 - 8:12 pm

          • #54 by Fullerton Lover on December 5, 2015 - 10:36 pm

            Unbelievable!

            This Teacher at Troy High School in the video that Moral Turpitude submitted above, actually gets caught reds-handed stealing an election from an innocent 16 year old student that she deems as unworthy of being elected, which sounds like an oxymoron in itself, and yet we are still paying this woman $10,000.00 a month to teach our children!

            Unfreakingbelieveable!

            • #55 by FJUHSD on December 6, 2015 - 6:56 am

              When I confronted Giokaris with this, he told me it would cost $500,000 to fire her and they weren’t going to do that. She was caught red handed. Obviously, cannot tell right from wrong.

              To make matters worse, the principal was directed to take action by the board and that didn’t happen until it went on her record.

              School is not about the kids, if it was this would not be happening.
              What a mess this was and continues to be.

          • #56 by Fullerton Lover on December 5, 2015 - 10:37 pm

      • #57 by A Troy Student on December 5, 2015 - 11:57 pm

        “Former ASB Presidents and faculty are adults now”
        Yes, and what is your point with that statement?

    • #58 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 12:00 pm

      You are missing the point. Respect is earned and the ASB president is clearly ignoring any information/facts/opinion not in concert with his own.

      Are you expecting him to give you a recommendation letter for college?

  25. #59 by An Oracle Writer on December 5, 2015 - 11:32 am

    This is ridiculous. Writers of the Troy High School Oracle spend HOURS writing their articles, drafts upon drafts. Our award-winning program does it’s best to stay objective and factual, while providing interesting articles for students. We aren’t “promoting” any sort of lifestyle, we are simply reporting news for our ever-changing society. Grow up. The world isn’t the same as it was 20 years ago, and if you don’t catch up, you WILL suffer the consequences.

    • #60 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 12:35 pm

      “if you don’t catch up, you WILL suffer the consequences.”

      Translation: If each and every one of you don’t conform to our way of thinking on gay marriage, you WILL suffer the consequences.

      Change for the sake of change; all change is good change?

      No one is stating that the students are not devoting an incredible amount of time producing the Oracle. I believe you are being used as a pawn to advance the agendas of Ms. Cheney and others that share the same viewpoint. This is effectively done, as she is in the position to make or break the student. Pretty ugly stuff.

      As has already been expressed, the reporting is not objective. The piece on Gay Marriage is promotional, as if this is a way of living that can ever be promoted. Your own former ASB president stated that it is a “celebration.”

  26. #61 by dear whoever wrote this on December 5, 2015 - 12:59 pm

    ur a fucking idiot

    • #62 by Joe Imbriano on December 5, 2015 - 1:29 pm

      That would be me and may I ask who you are?

    • #63 by Annoymous on December 6, 2015 - 1:19 pm

      Is that, as a Troy student, the best you can do?

      Attacking the messenger never works.

  27. #64 by To the writer on December 5, 2015 - 4:38 pm

    I see you want to write for The Onion 8o)

  28. #65 by Troy student on December 5, 2015 - 4:43 pm

    Your article is a glaring sign that you’re pretty desperate for an article. Well memed Joy Imbriano, have a dollar [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡◥▶ ͜ʖ ͡◀◤)̲̅$̲̅]

  29. #66 by 4chan on December 5, 2015 - 4:45 pm

    ༼ ▀̿̿Ĺ̯̿̿▀̿ ༼ ▀̿̿Ĺ̯̿̿▀̿༽▀̿̿Ĺ̯̿̿▀̿ ༽
    We’re taking you for a walk Joe Imbriano.

    • #67 by Anonymous on December 6, 2015 - 2:45 pm

      It is about time someone with some guts and some integrity stood up to the bullies in gay lobby. What is being done to high school students is criminal. Do your homework on the agenda and you will see just who is really behind all this so called celebration of tolerance. Sandusky does what Harvey Milk and does time. Harvey Milk gets a postage stamp and a National Holiday. None dare call it education for good reason.

      Looking over these comments is so painful.

  30. #68 by Crest on December 5, 2015 - 6:10 pm

    Bro.
    Bro you need to chill.
    Bro don’t even worry about it, it’s all good. The homosexuals may not be able to bring holiday cheer to your indoctrinated, stuffy hear, but it’s ok, my genderqueer partner and I will donate to the less fortunate and sing carols on your behalf.

  31. #69 by Troy Student on December 5, 2015 - 9:02 pm

    This makes me realize, how useless it is of Troy students to comment on here. We aren’t achieving anything.

  32. #70 by Cheney's dream team on December 5, 2015 - 9:47 pm

    Benjamin Franklin famously quipped, “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”

    Franklin evidently failed to envisage today’s postmodern left. For the conservative, there exists at least one other certainty, and it is this: The degree to which “progressives” attack you corresponds precisely to the degree with which you challenge any among their assorted, distorted and sordid sacred cows.

    What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys? (No, not Jerry Sandusky.)

    What would you call a man of whom, as regards sexual preference, his own friend and biographer confessed, “Harvey always had a penchant for young waifs with substance abuse problems”?

    In a recent interview with OneNewsNow.com, I called this man “demonstrably, categorically an evil man based on his [statutory] rape of teenage boys.”

    But you can call him Harvey Milk.

    Harvey Milk’s only claim to fame is that he was the first openly homosexual candidate to be elected to public office (San Francisco city commissioner). His chief cause was to do away with the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic. In 1978 Milk was murdered over a non-related political dispute by fellow Democrat Dan White.

    And a “progressive” martyr was born.

    Merriam Webster defines “pederast” as “one who practices anal intercourse especially with a boy.” It defines “statutory rape” as “the crime of having sex with someone who is younger than an age that is specified by law.”

    Harvey Milk was both a pederast and, by extension, a statutory rapist. After I publicly addressed this objective reality in the above-mentioned interview, the liberal blogosphere reacted in, shall we say, an informatively defensive manner.

    A Huffington Post headline screamed: “Harvey Milk Was An ‘Evil Man’ Who Raped Teenage Boys, Unworthy of Postage Stamp: Matt Barber.”

    The always-amusing Right Wing Watch blog breathlessly posted my comments with the header: “Barber: ‘Harvey Milk Was Demonstrably, Categorically an Evil Man.’”

    And so on.

    Here’s what’s especially telling about their reaction. Not one of the dozen-or-more publications that reported on my comments even challenged their veracity. Not one attempted to refute or deny that Harvey Milk was, in fact, a pederast and a sexual predator.

    That’s because they can’t.

    One of Milk’s victims was a 16-year-old runaway from Maryland named Jack Galen McKinley. As previously mentioned, Milk had a soft spot in his, um, heart for teenage runaways. Motivated by an apparent quid pro quo of prurience, Milk plucked McKinley from the street.

    Randy Shilts was a San Francisco Chronicle reporter and close friend to Harvey Milk. Though Shilts died of AIDS in 1994, he remains, even today, one of the most beloved journalists in the “LGBT” community.

    Shilts was also Harvey Milk’s biographer. In his glowing book “The Mayor of Castro Street,” he wrote of Milk’s “relationship” with the McKinley boy: ” … Sixteen-year-old McKinley was looking for some kind of father figure. … At 33, Milk was launching a new life, though he could hardly have imagined the unlikely direction toward which his new lover would pull him.”

    In a sane world, of course, the only direction his “new lover” should have pulled him was toward San Quentin. But, alas, today’s America – a burgeoning relativist land of make-believe – is anything but sane.

    Randy Thomasson, child advocate and founder of SaveCalifornia.com, is one of the nation’s foremost experts on Harvey Milk. Of the Shilts biography, Thomasson notes, “Explaining Milk’s many flings and affairs with teenagers and young men, Randy Shilts writes how Milk told one ‘lover’ why it was OK for him to also have multiple relationships simultaneously: ‘As homosexuals, we can’t depend on the heterosexual model. … We grow up with the heterosexual model, but we don’t have to follow it. We should be developing our own lifestyle. There’s no reason why you can’t love more than one person at a time.’”

    Whereas McKinley, a disturbed runaway boy, desperately sought a “father figure” to provide empathy, compassion, wisdom and direction, he instead found Harvey Milk: a promiscuous sexual predator who found, in McKinley, an opportunity to satisfy a perverse lust for underage flesh.

    Years later McKinley committed suicide.

    Another teen who crossed paths with Harvey Milk was Christian convert and former homosexual Gerard Dols. In a 2008 radio interview with Concerned Women for America, Dols shared of how – as a physically disabled teen – the “very nice” Harvey Milk had encouraged him in 1977 to run away from his Minnesota home and come to San Francisco.

    According to Dols, Milk told him, “Don’t tell your parents,” and later sent him a letter with instructions. Thankfully, the letter was intercepted by Dols’ parents who then filed a complaint with the Minnesota attorney general’s office.

    The incident was evidently swept under the rug.

    So what does a man like Harvey Milk get for his apparent crimes? While most sexual predators get time in prison and a dishonorable mention on the registry of sex offenders, Harvey Milk got his own California state holiday (“Harvey Milk Day”) and, more recently, his own commemorative postage stamp, awarded by the Obama administration’s USPS.

    God bless America?

    As troubling as the postage stamp may be, to me – the father of a soon-to-be-teenage boy – the specter of having a “Harvey Milk Day” forced upon millions of California children, parents and educators is even more troubling. Especially in light of Milk’s own sordid history with minors.

    Even so, and quite obviously, not everyone agrees. Some have said that my reality-based assessment of Harvey Milk is “uncivil.” Our historical revisionist friends on the left tend to get a bit snooty when you publicly deconstruct one of their meticulously fabricated mythical martyrs.

    I find that odd.

    To me, even the mere notion of elevating, to hero status, a man who statutorily raped teenage boys, is what’s uncivil.

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/sexual-predator-honored-with-u-s-postage-stamp/#U1GVi3Lt2lvIoVsy.99

    • #71 by Anonymous on December 5, 2015 - 10:10 pm

      Let’s have a pep rally and celebrate Harvey Milk day. Let’s invite the incoming freshman class. Hey can the Troy ASB president be the Master of ceremonies?

    • #72 by Harvey Milk on December 6, 2015 - 7:04 am

      I did not know this.

  33. #73 by Anonymous on December 6, 2015 - 12:43 am

    I would like to add that the articles of the Oracle are submitted and chosen by the students in the class. Ms. Cheney is the advisor; however, the class is almost fully student-run. It was the students’ choice to include this article and they are published because they are applicable to the Troy population, as in this case. Additionally, the photo at the top regarding gender choices is a part of a news article INFORMING of the gender choices in the revised UC Application, from an issue released this year. Lastly, the photo where the “gay flag trumps the United States flag” is a courtesy photo not taken by Oracle photographers. Don’t crop out the source while trying to make a point.

    • #74 by Annoymous on December 6, 2015 - 12:34 pm

      The students’ request to cover the wireless radiation topic was denied.

      Sorry, no defense of Ms. Cheney’s role in all of this.

  34. #75 by Annoymous on December 6, 2015 - 7:29 am

    Wouldn’t it be great if Troy would just educate the kids?

    Why can’t they just be nice to our kids?

    What an idea.

  35. #76 by Joe Imbriano on December 6, 2015 - 4:01 pm

    Hey gang, now lets start talking about the forced vaccinations and the forced wireless exposure that your teachers, administrators and your parents, yes your parents that ARE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR BY THEIR COMPLICITY AND SILENCE for the better part of almost three years in Fullerton on these issues.

    That is why I am here. I am here to sound the alarm. Forget being politically correct for just a moment and look at these two issues objectively. The Oracle under Cheney’s direction has done no such thing yet these issues affect EVERY SINGLE STUDENT. If you are not concerned, then you have not done your homework.

    I have a proposition for the IB students. Replicate this experiment.

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2013/05/can-wifi-signals-stunt-plant-growth/

    Can WiFi Signals Stunt Plant Growth?
    May 24, 2013
    By DANIEL BEAN

    Image credit: 9b Hjallerup School

    A Danish science experiment by a group of 9th-graders has gained worldwide interest and may have us rethinking the proliferation of wireless devices in our homes.

    Five girls from Hjallerup Skole, a primary education school in Denmark, began the experiment after noticing that when they slept with their cellphones near their heads overnight, they had trouble focusing the next day, according to Danish News site DR.

    The resources weren’t available to conduct an experiment around wireless signals affecting brain activity, so instead the girls decided to monitor the growth of plants near WiFi routers – and the results were a bit shocking.

    Six trays containing the seeds of a garden cress herb were placed in a room without a WiFi router, and six trays were placed in a different room and next to two WiFi routers which, according to the girls’ calculations, emitted about the same type of radiation as an ordinary cellphone, reports DR.

    During the 12 days of the experiment, the seeds in the six trays away from the WiFi routers grew normally, while the seeds next to the routers did not. In fact, the project photos show that many of the seeds placed near the routers turned brown and died.

    “This has sparked quite a lively debate in Denmark regarding the potential adverse health-effects from mobile phones and WiFi-equipment,” Kim Horsevad, biology teacher at Hjallerup Skole told ABC News.

    Horsevad said that some of the local debate over the experiment has been over whether the negative effects were due to the cress seeds drying from the heat emitted by the computer/WiFi routers used in the experiment. But she explained that the students kept the cress seeds in both groups sufficiently moist during the whole experiment, and the temperatures were controlled thermostatically.

    A similar study was conducted about three years ago in the Netherlands when researchers noticed that some trees in urban areas were showing “bark lumps,” according to Popular Science. The experiment, conducted by Wageningen University, involved exposing 20 ash trees to various kinds of radiation for three months. The trees chosen to test tolerance to heavy WiFi signals began to show typical signs of radiation sickness, including a “lead-like shine” on their leaves.

    As for the attention the girl’s science fair project is getting, Horsevad said neuroscience professor Olle Johanssen with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden has expressed great interest.

    “[Johanssen] will probably be repeating the experiment in controlled, professional, scientific environments,” said Horsevad. “One would therefore generally be advised to await the results of his experiments before basing any important decisions on the outcome of the girls’ experiment.”

    • #77 by Dorothy Ave on December 7, 2015 - 11:34 am

      More than fair questions Joe. What is troubling is that this experiment has not been replicated anywhere in the United States. I believe you covered this several years ago as I remember the fliers you were passing out over at Acacia with this article referenced.

      You would think schools would be falling all over themselves to conduct such a simple experiment, especially considering these children are the subjects of the exact same experiment. It just goes to show how disingenuinous the entire system is.

      BTW, good luck on your bid for council. I feel an upset in the works.

  36. #78 by Joe Imbriano on December 6, 2015 - 4:04 pm

    Then put the findings in the Oracle that to date, has ignored everything it has been presented with on these issues.

  37. #79 by Wireless & Health from Harvard Ph.D in physics on December 6, 2015 - 4:50 pm

    What does the Harvard educated physicist know that all of the FJUHSD trustees ignore?

    HEALTH ISSUES | Message to Public Schools and Parents about Wireless Devices and Health
    http://www.thegreengazette.ca/message-to-public-schools/

    Ronald M. Powell, is a retired US government scientist (Ph.D., Applied Physics, Harvard University, 1975). During his government career, he worked for the Executive Office of the President, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. For those organizations, respectively, he addressed federal research and development program evaluation, energy policy research, and measurement development in support of the electronics and electrical-equipment industries and the biomedical research community. He currently interacts with other scientists and with physicians around the world on the impact of the environment – including the radiofrequency/microwave environment – on human health.

    • #80 by Joe Imbriano on December 6, 2015 - 5:05 pm

      Yeah and so does Ms. Anne Sinek who interviews the Troy students for Harvard as she pushes for wireless K-12. I don’t suppose any of you have seen us on the sidewalk holding up the banners warning about all of this? I don’t suppose any of you have received one of the ten thousand fliers I handed out at the Fullerton Schools, soccer fields, back to school night, little league, city council or school board meetings that your parents threw in the trash? Such betrayal of the students on so many fronts.

  38. #81 by Oscillatorium on December 6, 2015 - 5:45 pm

    take a look at what your Biology teacher will never tell you about:

    http://www.oscillatorium.com/index.html

  39. #82 by Anonymous on December 6, 2015 - 6:31 pm

    [–]Kilenaitor[S] 10 points 1 day ago
    This is an article written about my high school alma mater. Popped up on my newsfeed. The article itself combined with the comments below it are what I would consider rage inducing. Blows my mind that some people think that this is reality.
    permalink
    [–]ipitythefool420 2 points 14 hours ago
    Need to vaccinate against conservatism instead.
    permalinkparent
    [–]nate121k 7 points 1 day ago
    Holy conservatism batman.
    permalink
    [–]cat_handcuffs 3 points 20 hours ago
    Is this Fullerton, CA?
    permalink
    [–]Kilenaitor[S] 5 points 19 hours ago
    Yup.
    permalinkparent
    [–]TheShatnerIncident 1 point 7 hours ago*
    Isn’t that the place where that group of police officers beat that homeless mentally ill guy to death a while back?
    permalinkparent
    [–]Gamebag1 3 points 19 hours ago
    Why are vaccinations gay?
    permalink
    [–]Archer1949 3 points 19 hours ago
    I think the Vaccination turn you gay. Maybe. It’s hard to tell from the linked page’s horrendous layout.
    permalinkparent
    [–]Gamebag1 1 point 11 hours ago
    oh no
    permalinkparent
    [–]Altered-Beast 1 point 13 hours ago
    Long page is long.
    permalink

  40. #83 by Anonymous on December 6, 2015 - 6:32 pm

    “The radical homosexual and forced vaccination agendas advancing at Fullerton’s Troy high school” by Kilenaitor in rage
    [–]Kilenaitor[S] 5 points 19 hours ago
    Yup.
    permalinkcontextfull comments (10)
    “The radical homosexual and forced vaccination agendas advancing at Fullerton’s Troy high school” by Kilenaitor in rage
    [–]Kilenaitor[S] 10 points 1 day ago
    This is an article written about my high school alma mater. Popped up on my newsfeed. The article itself combined with the comments below it are what I would consider rage inducing. Blows my mind that some people think that this is reality.
    permalinkcontextfull comments (10)

  41. #84 by Blood as a Biomarker on December 6, 2015 - 6:33 pm

    What happens to your blood when you are exposed to wireless radiation?

    A biomarker identifying these radiation exposures is indicated in the blood of most people.
    The red blood cells line up or ‘coin’. It is known as “sticky blood” and prevents normal blood flow through our vessels to reach tissue throughout our body. Not good.

    It’s known as the Rouleau formation.

    http://www.oscillatorium.com/id81.html

  42. #85 by Anonymous on December 6, 2015 - 6:35 pm

    Kyle Minshall
    @Kilenaitor

  43. #86 by EMF & Autism on December 6, 2015 - 7:09 pm

  44. #87 by Anonymous on December 6, 2015 - 9:11 pm

    So Joe, it appears to me that you have a bunch of students that are not capable of critical thinking unless it involves programming and GPAs, staff that are pretending none of this is going on, parents that only care about getting them into college at all costs, and a PTA that could care less about anything except selling egg nog and donations. Now what?

  45. #88 by Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963) on December 7, 2015 - 10:11 am

    “There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.”

    thoughts?

  46. #89 by Yale U Hospital, Chief of Obstetrics on December 7, 2015 - 10:51 am

    Dr. Hugh Taylor, Chief of Obstetrics, Yale University Hospital and spokesperson of The BabySafe Project

    This was presented in public comments to the FJUHSD trustees as well as all of the principals in attendance at the school board meeting. The citation was also sent via email to the trustees.

    I would think that teachers, those pregnant or wanting to become pregnant, should have a right to this information.
    Isn’t every woman deserving of a healthy baby? How can that happen if the school environment they teach in for hours each day is saturated in unprecedented amounts of wireless radiation?

    Why does do FJUHSD trustees and principals ignore this information; why do the principals ignore this information?

    The BabySafe Project
    “More than one hundred physicians, scientists and public health professionals from around the world
    have joined together to express their concern about the risk that wireless radiation poses to pregnancy
    and to urge pregnant women to limit their exposures. READ THEIR JOINT STATEMENT.”

    http://www.babysafeproject.org

  47. #90 by U C Berkeley on December 7, 2015 - 3:07 pm

    Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D.
    Director, Center for Family and Community Health
    University of California, Berkeley

    “Some Tips to Reduce Your Exposure to Wireless Radiation”

    http://www.uft.org/files/attachments/wireless-radiation-reduce-exposure.pdf

  48. #91 by Anonymous on December 7, 2015 - 7:11 pm

    Are there any HIV positive students on campus? If so, how many? Where can we find this information? So what do the students do to protect themselves when they use the toliets? Are there adequate supplies in the bathrooms? Does the district report on AIDS cases? I would like some answers. Those statistics are nothing to celebrate.

    • #92 by Anon on December 7, 2015 - 8:57 pm

      Agreed, on all accounts. This must be addressed.

      This is truly an “inconvenient truth” surrounding the ‘celebration.’

  49. #93 by Harvard U Medical School on December 8, 2015 - 7:21 am

    Martha Herbert, Ph.D., M.D.
    Pediatric Neurologist and Neuroscientist
    Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital

    On wireless radiation in schools:

    “In fact, there are thousands of papers that have accumulated over decades — and are now accumulating at an accelerating pace, as our ability to measure impacts become more sensitive–that document adverse health and neurological impacts of EMF/RFR.”

    “EMF/RFR from wifi and cell towers can exert a disorganizing effect on the ability to learn and remember, and can also be destabilizing to immune and metabolic function.”

    Is this what Troy students want?

    This information is being ignored by the school board, principals, PTSA.

    Source: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html

  50. #94 by Anonymous on December 8, 2015 - 11:00 am

    Is the Oracle is a biased rag run by one?

  51. #95 by Anonymous on December 11, 2015 - 9:23 pm

    so if you are all against wireless radiation, i assume you are against all forms of wifi, including those at your homes and workplaces? we should get rid of that and go back to dial-up internet, then. you know what? let’s get rid of all cell phones in general they emit radiation too! and about hiv: that argument is illogical. how about public places? there are plenty of people there who may be hiv positive, but how would we know? might as well isolate ourselves from the world and live in a box! radiation, vaccines, homosexuality? the world is SO corrupt!

    • #96 by Anonymous on December 12, 2015 - 12:34 pm

      You would assume correct in that those of us that understand RF-radiation exposures are a health hazard and respect health and life have essentially removed them from our homes. Why wouldn’t you?

      You can go back to ‘dial-up internet’ if you please. The better solution would be to connect with wires, Ethernet cords. Nowhere on this site does it advocate getting rid of cell phones; is that what you want?

      The fact of the matter is that it is much too late for denial of the wireless radiation health hazard. Lawsuits are already being filed, the dead and sick bodies are already stacking up, other countries are passing laws to get rid of microwave radiation in schools. Sorry, it’s all too late and we just have not gotten the word in the U.S.

      You can also go isolate yourself. Isn’t that nice we have freedom of choice?

  52. #97 by DNA Damage from wireless radiation on December 13, 2015 - 9:34 pm

    Dr. Jerry Phillips, Research Biochemist explains how the Mobile Phone Industry tried to prevent his DNA damage findings from being published.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0RQ7foc0B4

  53. #98 by Anonymous on December 14, 2015 - 11:02 pm

    What kind of student run newspaper is this? I thought that being on staff of the Oracle was akin to being in a journalism class? Being a journalist requires showing no bias. For the 3 years my daughter has been at Troy, I have never seen two sides to an issue presented.

    It seems like ever since Dr. Giokaris stepped down, Cheney stepped it up. Now they are running ads? Maybe someone should investigate where the money is going. Isnt this supposed to be a not for profit paper? Fortunately hardly anyone reads it at Troy.

  54. #99 by not born this way on December 16, 2015 - 10:57 am

    Troy’s GSA club is a powerful tool that can transform the school with the help of Ms. Cheney. Ms. Cheney appears to be hostile to the traditional family. Transforming schools is a radical concept. Mr. Imbriano’s timing and titling is so apropos.

    Troy’s GSA is a powerful tool that can change Troy High school. It will turn it into something it should never be, a place where only their viewpoint is welcome, not traditional values.

    Learn how to tackle a big problem at Troy and with Priscilla Cheney’s help, win positive results that transform the school for the long-term and silence any opposition coming from those who don’t agree.

    Fight for policies at Troy that provide strong protections for transgender and gender non-conforming youth while removing them from others that disagree as they continue disparaging traditional family values.

    Challenge the gender binary system in schools. Fight for LGBTQ issues and LGBTQ people to be included in the curriculum you learn at school. You get that-force feed it all the way down into the books. Find out how to personally contribute in your classes through your class assignments and presentations. Get ready to educate your teachers and provide them with lesson plans and assignments that meet the CA state standards. Prepare to convince teachers and administrators to incorporate LGBTQ topics into the curriculum and implement district-wide changes to curriculum standards.

    • #100 by Anonymous on December 16, 2015 - 6:12 pm

      Priscilla Cheney –CSUF: M.A. – English, Single Subject Teaching Credential – English. She has served Troy in many ways including Troy Tech Pre-Internship Teacher, Internship Adviser, IB Coordinator and WASC Self-Study Coordinator. She is currently teaching AP Language and Composition and IB SL English, and she is serving Troy as English Department Co-Chair and Oracle Adviser.

  55. #101 by serve your mother monster Lady Gaga on December 16, 2015 - 4:18 pm

    https://youtu.be/wV1FrqwZyKw

    You kids think you know how to think when it is this kind of degenerate bullshit that you all fill your empty heads with. She is your mother monster alright. May she serve you well.

    Enjoy the dehumanizing disease party that she promises all of you as you fight for your rights to regress the species into a dark form of necrophelia blended with transhumanism.

    • #102 by Anonymous on December 17, 2015 - 12:45 pm

      Today’s youth are too far gone. Let them go. They are a product of their pathetic parents. Its their choice to embrace their worldview. Let them learn the hard way.

  56. #103 by 33 degrees of separation on April 7, 2016 - 4:22 am

    Homosexuality being a capital offense had less to do with sin and more to do with protecting society. And more to do with the proper proliferation of society and family in a Godly, proper, moral and advantageous way!

    This is so profound I believe those that disagree with it lack even the most basic understanding of the building blocks of all human civilization from antiquity.

    And it not only protected the building blocks of all human civilization. But provided protections for the children born into a society from the harms of homosexuality and the deviance associated with it.

    And once these protections, mores and norms are compromised, children lose all ability to reason and separate out morality from deviance as to who they are and why they were born. As the male-female relationship and the purpose for it to a society becomes unrecognizable. Which in the end leaves all societies unable to conduct itself in a natural and civil way. As the lines of demarcation as to what is and is not beneficial to all societies become so blurred. That humans become no more then animals, brute beast without human empathy, reason and direction. This is precisely what is taught in the biology textbooks: man is an animal.

    As the backlit screen dictated blurring effects of the 21st century bears down upon human civilization, this agenda has become the tool of the social engineers who espouse their perceived fervent intent to good will but instead wield such a weapon against all remaining traditional vestiges of societal norms. Ultimately their goal is to destabilize society and in the process, reduce population levels to what have been arbitrarily deemed sustainable. This is an undeniable fact that can no longer be ignored. Western civilization is in an irreversible, full collapse. Your churches will suffer the same fate as those of Europe becoming museums, the fecundity of your offspring will cease to be, and your gods of technology and pure liberalism will devour you.

    • #104 by Anonymous on April 7, 2016 - 11:59 am

      It can’t be too soon until you ignorant bigots die off.

  57. #105 by Anonymous on April 7, 2016 - 11:26 am

    Very well said, 33 degrees of separation. You are brilliant!

  58. #106 by WilliamBef on May 6, 2016 - 12:20 pm

    Im thankful for the forum.Really thank you! Great.

  59. #107 by Anon on May 6, 2016 - 7:57 pm

    There has ALWAYS been homosexuality in nature. From animals to humans. It’s just a fact of life that it happens. SCIENCE is proving this with brain scans. It is what it is and It just is. Nobody makes a conscience choice to be strait or gay. That’s the facts. It’s time to stop hurting people. I’ll tell you what I think is a sin. Being cruel and causing harm (physical, psychological) to your fellow human beings. For God is love and anyone that loveth knoweth God. The greatest of these is love. Love thy neighbor. Judge not lest ye be judged. It’s all right there, especially all of it written in red.
    Enough of this impregnating of the masses’ need for spirituality with this poisonous hatred that is so far from the true message. Pretty sure there is enough people (most likely TOO MANY) having children to secure the future of the human race. How about we start worrying about making education priority number one? How about working our hardest to make the human race at least a two planet species? That sounds like a plan for guaranteeing your progeny lives. That being such a huge topic here.
    People either are gay or they are not. Enough of the hypocrisy and soul pain inflicted our fellow human beings already.

  60. #108 by "Gay bowel syndrome" on December 30, 2016 - 9:11 am

    “In the U.S. governments own latest statistics, according to the CDC, 96.6% of adults over 18, identified as “straight”. That entire psy-op of the Kinsey Report stat of 10% from the 70’s was propaganda. So why is the homosexual agenda being pushed so hard? To destroy the family, demoralize the populace, and prepare humans to accept transhumanism. Tel Aviv was voted best t gay city in the world, even winning over NYC. In addition, Israel has one of the highest rates for sex slave trafficking. Most of the women sex prostitutes are non-Jews from Eastern Europe. In addition, the disturbing new sex ed curriculum, questioning young children on their gender, fails to teach students about the myriad of diseases found in homosexuals. Doctors have been criticised of late for the physician coined term “gay bowel syndrome”. Apparently the truth is politically incorrect,as is the truth. When the spincter muscle loses elasticity, it causes one to lose control of their bowels at any given time.
    The clinical diagnoses in decreasing order of frequency include condyloma acuminata, hemorrhoids, nonspecific proctitis, anal fistula, perirectal abscess, anal fissure, amebiasis, benign polyps, viral hepatitis, gonorrhea, syphilis, anorectal trauma and foreign bodies, shigellosis, rectal ulcers and lymphogranuloma venereum.
    Also, rectal prolapse is a condition in which the rectum (the last part of the large intestine before it exits the anus) loses its normal attachments inside the body, allowing it to telescope out through the anus, thereby turning it “inside out”. I don’t think homosexuals should be harmed, but homosexuality shoud certainly not be encouraged nor celebrated.”

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr077.pdf

  61. #109 by LGBT Exposed--Full Documentary on December 30, 2016 - 9:01 pm

  62. #110 by Vaccinations on January 1, 2017 - 10:06 am

    “Ironically the more educated someone is the more susceptible they are to being fooled by Big Pharma and the Ministry of Propaganda on this issue. This is because somewhere along their education they took one or more science classes that talked about Edward Jenner & smallpox, Louis Pasteur & rabies, Jonas Salk & Albert Sabin & their respective polio vaccines, the ideal of the scientific method, and the storied honesty and integrity of scientists.

    Unfortunately they never took a class on the corruption of Big Pharma, the MOP, government, and researchers who can be bought or coerced when there are enormous profits to be made. To borrow from Noel Twyman in his book Bloody Treason it is “an incredible ménage of millionaires, industrialists, extremists, and corrupt politicians—bringing into the scene their various secret transgressions and liaisons. It is not a pretty picture…These people did not play by the prescribed rules. They made up their own rules as they went along. They all lived lives of deceit and betrayal. Out of this mise en scène exotique [exotic staging] emerged” vaccines with horrific and permanent consequences from contaminents that remain to this day despite claims to the contrary.

    None of that mise en scène exotique is covered in virtually any science class from high school to graduate school and medical school. Part of what remains from the classes that were taken is a scientific hubris that keeps many from getting past their shallow assumptions. As some wise person once said: “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.” (apparently falsely attributed to Mark Twain.)”

  63. #111 by Anonymous on January 3, 2017 - 5:31 pm

    Troy is a major hotbed of this type of indoctrination. Most of the staff pushes radical feminism. Fullerton High School is just a cesspool as everything just gets paraded around. Troy is where the leaders for tomorrow are getting schooled into this warped world view. I wouldn’t go around sharing this article with my PTA friends but I sure as heck agree with all of it.

    • #112 by Mary on January 4, 2017 - 9:40 am

      The schools are filled with degenerate admin & teachers who , in turn, turn the kids that way.

  64. #113 by Anonymous on January 3, 2017 - 8:59 pm

    <ove the photo of the Troy newspaper queen

  65. #114 by Anonymous on January 6, 2017 - 4:22 pm

    Love all you haters on this site.

  66. #115 by oh boy on October 24, 2017 - 8:42 pm

    you’re fucking crazy. I thought I was reading the onion. and even that’s more reputable than you.

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!