Andrew_Classroom_De_La_Salle_University-300x200 (1)

FJUHSD and FSD School Boards Ignore Warnings Re Classroom Microwave Radiation


All wireless devices/routers emit microwave radiation.  Classroom exposure levels are at levels trillions of times higher than we were exposed to as children.

Wired technology is more secure, fast, and does not emit radiation.

Why isn’t wired technology being used in Fullerton schools? 


Wi-Fi and iPads in schools is “a tragedy in the making.”

Dr. George Carlo, Ph.D, M.S., J.D, is a public health scientist, epidemiologist, lawyer, and the founder of the Science and Public Policy Institute.  Dr. Carlo headed the $28.5 million research program funded by the cell phone industry from 1993 to 1999.





“ . . . our wireless classrooms . . .  are totally safe for our kids.”

Robert Pletka, Ed. D., FSD Superintendent




Wireless RF-Radiation “should be regarded as carcinogenic (cancer causing). Current guidelines for exposure should be urgently revised.” 

Dr.  Lennart Hardell, Professor of Oncology, MD, PhD, was the head of The Hardell-group which conducted case control studies on brain tumours including assessment of use of mobile phones and cordless phones.  Based on the Hill criteria, glioma and acoustic neuroma should be considered to be caused by RF EMF emissions from wireless phones and regarded as carcinogenic to humans, classifying it as group 1 according to the IARC classification.




“My vision:  Every single child will have one 24/7” (about iPad use)

Hilda Sugarman, Fullerton School District Trustee



“We need to address the emerging public health crisis related to cell phones, wireless devices, wireless utility meters and wireless infrastructure in our schools and neighborhoods.”

200+  Scientists Appeal to the U.N. and World Health Organization

The 200+ scientists have collectively published over 2,000 peer-reviewed papers on non-ionizing radiation.




“ . . . our wireless classrooms . . .  are totally safe for our kids.”

Robert Pletka, Ed. D., FSD Superintendent





“Frey’s microwave exposure experiments findings varied from causing rats to become docile, altered specific behaviors of rats, altered heart rates, and caused frogs’ hearts to stop beating with microwave radiation at levels 10,000 times less than a cell phone.”

Alan Frey, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine.  For decades Frey, funded by the Office of Naval Research and the U.S. Army, was the most active researcher on the bioeffects of microwave radiation in the country. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=594



‘Promoting the use of technology in classrooms is the most important element of the student WiFi.’

Sonje Berg, Assistant Principal, Troy High School –



-“A look at the new student Wi-Fi on campus (!!) Priscilla Cheney Love! This is a beautiful issue!”




“Dr.  Salford . . .  found that the wireless radiation damaged the blood brain barrier at much lower levels than cell phones emissions.  A single 2-hour exposure . . .  was shown to damage or destroy up to 2% of an animal’s brain cells, resulting in memory impairment, genetic damage, and other biological effects.”

Dr.  Leif Salford, MD, PhD neurosurgeon at Lund University Hospital, and professor and Chairman of the Department of Neurosurgery.





“ . . . our wireless classrooms . . .  are totally safe for our kids.”

Robert Pletka, Ed. D., FSD Superintendent




“The FCC’s exposure guidelines did not consider information that addresses non-thermal prolonged exposures, i.e. chronic/prolonged, low-level (non-thermal) exposures.  The FCC exposure guidelines are considered protective of effects rising from a thermal mechanism but not all possible mechanisms.  Therefore, the generalization by many that the guidelines protect human beings from harm by any and all mechanisms is not justified.”

Norbert HankinSenior Scientist, Radiation Protection Division, United States EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-epa-tells-it-like-it-is-will-the-fsd/



“We and our kids are safe.”

Dr.  Roman Schulze, Fullerton D.O. response when confronted with the fact that the FCC exposure guidelines are 100,000,000  X higher than the Austrian Medical Association recommends.




“Currently there are no national or international “standards” for safety levels of radiofrequency devices.  Therefore, for anyone to claim that they meet FCC “standards” gives a false impression of safety certainty . . . “  FCC guidelines only deal with thermal effects, i.e. heat damage.  It says nothing about safety from the risk of many chronic diseases that the public is most concerned about such as cancer, miscarriage, birth defects, semen quality, auto immune diseases, etc.  The FCC guidelines are irrelevant and cannot be used for any claims of safetyunless we are addressing heat damage.  The bottom line is that the safety level for RF exposure related to non-thermal effects is unknown at present (2011) and whoever claims that their device is safe regarding non-thermal effects is either ignorant or misleading.”

D-Kun Lai, MD, PhD, MPH, Senior Research Scientist, Kaiser Permanente, Division of Research




“We and our kids are safe.”

Dr.  Roman Schulze, Fullerton D.O. response when confronted with the fact that the FCC exposure guidelines are 100,000,000  X higher than the Austrian Medical Association recommends.




FJUHSD trustees REFUSED to meet with the following worldwide experts in microwave radiation health/legal matters:

Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Sweden, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, whose peer reviewed science demonstrates RF-radiation is carcinogenic

Ms.  Dabna Tachover, Israel, an attorney with the lawsuit to ban WiFi in Israeli schools

Magda Havas, Ph.D., Canada, an associate professor of Environmental & Resource Studies at Trent University with extensive background in EMF and health, particularly the school environment


Meeting flatly refused by FJUHSD trustees:  President Barbara Kilponen, Robert Singer, Robert Hathaway, Marilyn Buchi, Andy Montoya

“ . . . it will not be possible to set up a meeting” with the FJUHSD trustees.

Ken Stichter, Ed.D., FJUHSD Superintendent, April 28, 2015, email correspondence to parent



California Medical Association (CMA)

“. . .  thus current standards are  inadequate to protect public health . . . “

“RESOLVED; that the CMA understands that existing public safety limits for microwave EMF devices are outdated and inadequate to protect public health . . . “

House of Delegates Resolution Wireless Standards Reevaluation 2014 Resolution 107- 14PASSEDDate Adopted Dec 7, 2014




FJUHSD vote to install wireless in all high schools: President Barbara Kilponen, Robert Singer, Robert Hathaway, Marilyn Buchi, Andy Montoya

“It was the consensus of the Board” to install wireless.

Jennifer Williams, Ed. D, FJUHSD Assistant Superintendent, in email correspondence to parent, dated 9-23-15



“…Right now veterans that served their countries are asking about their grandchildren being mutated and requiring immediate surgeries. We can’t put our children in a microwave but we send them to school where they are put in a man made microwave called a classroom bathed in 2.4 GHz EMFs. These EMFs [are] expanding and collapsing inside bodies, buildings and infrastructure 4.8 billion times per second.Can DNA, tissue, cells or molecules withstand violent oscillations 4.8 billion times per second? …”

Curtis Bennett,

Chief Science Officer,

Interprovincial Journeyman Electrician(Red Seal), Building Engineering Technologist, Adjunct Professor for Accredited Medical Education For CME Credits, Thermal Radiation Consultant for 35 Years, http://www.stayonthetruth.com/non-ionizing-radiation-identical-health-effects.php


FJUHSD strategy to ignore health hazards of microwave radiation, termed as ‘critics’, and move ahead with bringing in wireless to all of the high schools:

“From a strategy point of view, if the (FJUHSD) Board gives the authorization, it is not the intent of the superintendent to make any big announcement or engage in any fanfare regarding the decision to move forward with WiFi plans.  This would only fan the fire of critics.  Rather, we have a district technology plan and we will move forward in a quiet matter of fact way.”

Provided by  Jennifer Williams, Ed. D, FJUHSD Assistant Superintendent, in CA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST to parent.


Wi-Fi and iPads in schools is “f***ing crazy.”

Dr. George Carlo, Ph.D, M.S., J.D, is a public health scientist, epidemiologist, lawyer, and the founder of the Science and Public Policy Institute.  Dr. Carlo headed the $28.5 million research program funded by the cell phone industry from 1993 to 1999. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=3&v=1gkcPZV4coQ


“Parent Vivien Moreno stated her support of rapidly introducing and utilizing wireless technology capability throughout the sites.”  FJUHSD school board meeting minutes dated 9/21/2015

Vivien Moreno, Fullerton Observer reporter assigned to FJUHSD and parent.  Ms.  Moreno has been present during most, if not all, of the public comments presenting the cancer science and serious health hazards to our children and teachers from wireless.




Why are Fullerton school boards bringing in microwave radiation when countries are enacting laws against it and schools are taking actions to remove it????

France 2015 – Law passed to ban Wi-Fi in nursery schools, preschools for age 3 and under; turning off wireless devices when not being used in elementary schools

Israel 2015 – Banned Wi-Fi in Kindergarten

US – Ashland, Massachusetts Public Schools have implemented Wi-Fi Device “Best Practices” which include turning the Wi-Fi off when not in use and keeping devices on a table || Private schools in U.S. are either removing or deciding not to install wireless for health reasons

Actions on wireless around the world:



Family sues Fay School in Southboro, claims Wi-Fi made son ill



Parents, grandparents & community:  We are Fullerton parents, please contact us so that we may work together to immediately end wireless radiation exposures to students and teachers in Fullerton schools.

Thank you.




Chris Thompson



Lynn Thornley

Vice President

1620403_788339891208385_5592146987230243142_n1d17142Scott10769unnamed-1-297x300 (2)33984_479084712158056_1011868072_n-1-300x2251image001-15-300x237image001-13-300x224

Newbies at the helm of the FSD

Newbies at the helm of the FSD


  1. #1 by Joe Imbriano on September 19, 2015 - 8:27 pm

    You have to be out of your mind to dismiss this.

    • #2 by Anonymous on September 20, 2015 - 12:01 pm

      People are just stupid sheep and honestly, I hate to say this, but their kids deserve this.

  2. #3 by Fullerton school boards, PTAs, PTSAs, foundations on September 20, 2015 - 2:20 pm

    Yes and don’t we all feel good now that Fullerton’s irradiators of children have made radiation mandatory in Fullerton schools.

    What egos these people must have to ignore the overwhelming science and destroy the health of thousands of children.

  3. #4 by Fullerton mom on September 21, 2015 - 9:16 am

    Why would schools knowingly harm children? Why would the industry? No one is intentionally harming children. Get your facts straight. The technology has been tested and proven safe. If you don’t like it then find other options for your children and quit forcing your conspiracy theories on everyone.

    • #5 by Igotistical idiot? on September 29, 2015 - 7:46 am

      Your poor child, I feel sorry for a child whose mother cannot even discern truth from lies on a matter which could destroy not only the health of the child but also the life. Yet, she posts lies and is clearly in denial or intentionally wanting great harm to come to others.
      You speak from a position which possesses not a shred of truth. How much longer can you keep up with this denial????? Are you influencing others to irradiate their children? Are you an egotistical idiot? That must be the case because an idiot would make statements such as ‘proven safe’.
      You know that you are telling lies of the highest order and impact. You must really hate humanity, the kids for doing this.

    • #6 by Anonymous on September 29, 2015 - 9:12 am

      Any corporation by it’s very nature is based on and admired by it’s shareholders on it’s level of greed.

      Do you think that Volkswagen diesel engines were rigged to pass our smog tests, then spew carcinogens and pollutants into our children’s lungs because the Volkswagen corporation cares so much about you and your family?

      Right on Joe!

      I’m personally overjoyed that a father cares enough about his children, as well as my own children, to make a heroic stand and fight for our children when the people and institutions that are supposed to protect them, are doing nothing but protecting their own hides/wallets.

  4. #7 by Shane on September 28, 2015 - 11:21 am

    Did you forget anyone?

  5. #8 by Doctor needs to be sued on September 29, 2015 - 7:52 am

    ” . . . whoever claims that their device is safe regarding non-thermal effects is either ignorant or misleading.”
    D-Kun Lai, MD, PhD, MPH, Senior Research Scientist, Kaiser Permanente, Division of Research

    The Dr. Shulze should be sued for the lies and advice about RF-radiation.
    He is very stupid in his comments about the FCC. I wonder what prompted him to do this???

    What a sick dad.

  6. #9 by Joe Imbriano on September 29, 2015 - 9:23 am

    The Fullerton Informer Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:22 AM
    To: Chris Thompson , Beverly Berryman , Hilda Sugarman , lynn thornley , janny meyer , “Robert J. Feldhake” , Robert Pletka
    Cc: “Shawn E. Abrell, Esq.” , Brad Dacus , The Fullerton Informer

    This is a formal demand to immediately turn off all wireless systems and cease the use of all wireless technology in all Fullerton School District facilities pursuant to .CALIFORNIA EDUCATION CODE SECTIONS 32060-32065

    >>> start of quote

    (a) The Legislature finds and declares that art supplies which contain toxic substances or which are potential human carcinogens pose a significant danger to the health and safety of school children. The Legislature also finds and declares that school children are not sufficiently protected by present health laws in so far as materials which may be seriously harmful are not so labeled and therefore children are not properly warned as to the dangers inherent in the use of those materials.
    (b) The Legislature intends by this article to ensure that elementary school children are protected by prohibiting the sale of these toxic substances to schools, school districts, and private schools for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 6, inclusive, and that the toxic substances may be purchased by schools, school districts, and private schools for students in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, only if the materials are properly labeled, as described in Section 32064.

    32061. “Art or craft material” means any raw or processed material or manufactured product marketed or being represented by the manufacturer or repackager as being suitable for use in the demonstration or the creation of any work of visual or graphic art of any medium. These media may include, but shall not be limited to, paintings, drawings, prints, sculpture, ceramics, enamels, jewelry, stained glass, plastic sculpture, photographs, and leather and textile goods.

    (a) “Human carcinogen” means any substance listed as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
    (b) “Potential human carcinogen” means one of the following:
    (1) Any substance which does not meet the definition of human carcinogen, but for which there exists sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals, as determined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
    (2) Any chemical shown to be changed by the human body into a human carcinogen.

    32063. “Toxic substance causing chronic illness” means any of the following:
    (a) Human carcinogens.
    (b) Potential human carcinogens.
    (c) Any substance included in the list of hazardous substances prepared by the Director of Industrial Relations, pursuant to Section 6382 of the Labor Code, notwithstanding exemptions made for substances on the list which are used in particular forms, circumstances, or concentrations, if the health hazard presented by the substance is not the subject of label statements required by federal law.

    (a) For the 1987-88 academic year and for each academic year thereafter, no art or craft material that is deemed by the State Department of Health Services to contain a toxic substance, as defined by the California Hazardous Substance Act, Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 108100) of Part 3 of Division 104 of the Health and Safety Code, or a toxic substance causing chronic illness, as defined in this article, shall be ordered or purchased by any school, school district, or governing authority of a private school in California for use by students in kindergarten and grades 1 to 6, inclusive.
    (b) Commencing June 1, 1987, any substance that is defined in subdivision (a) as a toxic substance causing chronic illness shall not be purchased or ordered by a school, school district, or governing authority of a private school for use by students in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, unless it meets the labeling standards specified in Section 32065.
    (c) If the State Department of Health Services finds that, because the chronically toxic, carcinogenic, or radioactive substances contained in an art or craft product cannot be ingested, inhaled, or otherwise absorbed into the body during any reasonably foreseeable use of the product in a way that could pose a potential health risk, the department may exempt the product from these requirements to the extent it determines to be consistent with adequate protection of the public health and safety.
    (d) For the purposes of this article, an art or craft material shall be presumed to contain an ingredient that is a toxic substance causing chronic illness if the ingredient, whether an intentional ingredient or an impurity, is 1 percent or more by weight of the mixture or product, or if the State Department of Health Services determines that the toxic or carcinogenic properties of the art or craft material are such that labeling is necessary for the adequate protection of the public health and safety.

    32065. Warning labels for substances specified in Section 32064 shall meet all of the following standards:
    (a) The warning label shall be affixed in a conspicuous place and shall contain the signal word “WARNING,” to alert users of potential adverse health effects.
    (b) The warning label shall contain information on the health-related dangers of the art or craft material.
    (1) If the product contains a human carcinogen, the warning shall contain the statement: “CANCER HAZARD! Overexposure may create cancer risk.”
    (2) If the product contains a potential human carcinogen, and does not contain a human carcinogen, the warning shall contain the statement: “POSSIBLE CANCER HAZARD! Overexposure might create cancer risk.”
    (3) If the product contains a toxic substance causing chronic illness, the warning shall contain, but not be limited to, the following statement or statements where applicable:
    (A) May cause sterility or damage to reproductive organs.
    (B) May cause birth defects or harm to developing fetus.
    (C) May be excreted in human milk causing harm to a nursing infant.
    (D) May cause central nervous system depression or injury.
    (E) May cause numbness or weakness in the extremities.
    (F) Overexposure may cause damage to (specify organ).
    (G) Heating above (specify degrees) may cause hazardous decomposition products.
    (4) If a product contains more than one chronically toxic substance, or if a single substance can cause more than one chronic health effect, the required statements may be combined into one warning statement.
    (c) The warning label shall contain a list of ingredients that are toxic substances causing chronic illness.
    (d) The warning label shall contain a statement or statements of safe use and storage instructions, conforming to the following list. The label shall contain, but not be limited to, as many of the following risk statements as are applicable:
    (1) Keep out of reach of children.
    (2) When using, do not eat, drink, or smoke.
    (3) Wash hands after use and before eating, drinking, or smoking.
    (4) Keep container tightly closed.
    (5) Store in well ventilated area.
    (6) Avoid contact with skin.
    (7) Wear protective clothing (specify type).
    (8) Wear NIOSH certified masks for dust, mists, or fumes.
    (9) Wear NIOSH certified respirator with appropriate cartridge for (specify type).
    (10) Wear NIOSH certified supplied air respirator.
    (11) Use window exhaust fan to remove vapors and assure adequate ventilation (specify explosion proof if necessary).
    (12) Use local exhaust hood (specify type).
    (13) Do not heat above (specify degrees) without adequate ventilation. (14) Do not use/mix with (specify material).
    (e) The warning label shall contain a statement on where to obtain more information, such as, “Call your local poison control center for more health information.”
    (f) The warning label, or any other label on the substance, shall contain the name and address of the manufacturer or repackager.
    (g) If all of the above information cannot fit on the package label, a package insert shall be required to convey all the necessary information to the consumer. In this event, the label shall contain a statement to refer to the package insert, such as “CAUTION: See package insert before use.” For purposes of this section, “package insert” means a display of written, printed, or graphic matter upon a leaflet or suitable material accompanying the art supply. The language on this insert shall be nontechnical and nonpromotional in tone and content. The requirements set forth in subdivisions (a) to (g), inclusive, shall not be considered to be complied with unless the required words, statements, or other information appear on the outside container or wrapper, or on a package insert that is easily legible through the outside container or wrapper and is painted in a color in contrast with the product or the package containing the product. An art or craft material shall be considered to be in compliance with this section if Article 6 (commencing with Section 108500) of Chapter 4 of Part 3 of Division 104 of the Health and Safety Code requires labeling of the art or craft material, and if the material is in compliance with that article. The manufacturer of any art or craft material sold, distributed, offered for sale, or exposed for sale in this state shall supply upon request to the State Department of Health Services any information required by the department in order to perform its duties under this article.

    >>> end of quote

    Here is the logical application of CA Education Code
    California schools and school districts that install and operate wireless devices in elementary school classrooms are not in compliance with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064, if the antennas of these devices are powered on and able to send and receive data wirelessly.

    Use of wireless devices, including but not limited to, wireless routers, access points, computers, laptops, netbooks, Chromebooks, printers, tablets, speakers, SmartMeters and any other devices that have their antennas powered on to enable them to send and receive data wirelessly in California elementary schools (K-6) is not compliant with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064. Wired connections via Ethernet or fiber optic cables is the only way to connect these devices to each other or to the internet in a way that is compliant with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064.

    If the devices’ antennas for wi-fi, mobile data, blue tooth and GPS are all powered off, the antennas are disabled and cannot send and receive data wirelessly. This is whatCalifornia elementary schools must do to comply with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064. Devices that offer wired connectivity via Ethernet ports or USB-to-Ethernet adapaters can connect to the internet with a wired Ethernet or fiber optic cable and still be compliant with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064, as long as all of the devices’ antennas are powered off and disabled.

    In addition, the electronic devices in California schools must be positioned far enough away from students to not expose the students to extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields that are beyond a safe level: magnetic flux densities over 1 milliGauss are a problem. A measurement of ambient magnetic flux density of 7 milligauss (contributed by outside power lines) was high enough to force the closure of a school in Oregon and relocate all of the students.

    Measurements of magnetic flux density a few inches from many electronic devices yieldreadings as high as 150 milliGauss. The ELF magnetic flux densities fall off exponentially with increased distance from the device, so usually at 18-24″ from the device, the measurements drop below 1 milligauss. These photos visualize the issue for students: https://www.flickr.com/photos/89743379@N06/sets/72157633310156013.

    As the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2001 classified ELF magnetic fields as a possible human carcinogen regarding childhood leukemia, California elementary school classrooms must plan and implement technology use carefully to comply with CA EducationalCode §§32060-32064. Laptops and tablets should be used with external keyboards and pointing devices and all electrical devices placed on stands, tables or desks at least 18-24″ from any student. This means hand-holding computers or tablets or placing them in one’s lap is inappropiate for California elementary school students.

    Here is the CA Education code that requires this:

    1. To educate their students, schools routinely purchase educational materials, including art supplies and other materials. Charged with an even higher duty than parents to protect children while they are in school, the California Legislature found that art supplies containing “toxic substances” or which are “potential human carcinogens” pose a significant danger to the health and safety of school children. EDC 32060(a).

    2. In response, the California Legislature prohibited the sale of these toxic substances to schools, school districts, and private schools for use in kindergarten through sixth grade and may only be used in higher grades if the materials are properly labeled. EDC 32060(b); EDC 32064(a) and (b).

    3. The California Legislature defined “art or craft material” as “any raw or processed material or manufactured product marketed or being represented by the manufacturer or repackager as being suitable for use in the demonstration or the creation of any work of visual or graphic art of any medium,” EDC 32061, which include “radioactive substances”, see EDC 32064(c).

    4. The California Legislature defined “potential human carcinogen” to mean “any substance . . . for which there exists sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals, as determined by the [World Health Organization’s] International Agency for Research on Cancer”. EDC 32062(b)(1).

    5. In May 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified exposure to wireless microwave radiation from any source a Class 2B carcinogen as it found “sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals.” Wireless microwave radiation is also a “toxic substance causing chronic illness”, EDC 32063, as it is a potential human carcinogen.

    6. Many wireless devices, defined above, are “manufactured products marketed and being represented by the manufacturer . . . as being suitable for use in the demonstration or creation” of “visual or graphic art” media. Many other devices are manufactured to enable wireless connectivity to assist in the creation of visual or graphic art. It matters not if the art is a drawing or a graph of scientific or financial data. It’s the use of wireless connectivity, for any purpose, that is dangerous because the wireless signals, from any source, is a carcinogen that has many direct health impacts in addition to its carcinogenic properties.

    In closing, because the antennas of wireless devices, when powered on, transmit data wirelessly that is both a “toxic substance causing chronic illness” and defined as a “potential human carcinogen”, the use of these devices, with its antennas powered on are in all schools, public and private makes the schools not compliant with §§32060-32064 and these antennas must be powered off immediately. All contracts relating to equipment that require antennas to be powered on for the devices to be operational must be cancelled, as these contracts are null and void as they are not compliant with EDC §§32060-32064.

    FYI, the following text from Apple Inc.’s web page (http://www.apple.com/education/ipad/teaching-with-ipad/) says “With iPad and these powerful free apps, students write, analyze data, and present their work in engaging ways. In Pages,students make term papers anything but ordinary with photos, videos, and graphics. For data-rich projects, Numbers helps them express ideas in tables, charts, and graphs that go way beyond a mere spreadsheet. And in Keynote, students create presentations with stunning transitions and effects. Students can shoot and edit their own HD video with iMovie,create a visual journal with iPhoto.”

    It is Apple Inc.’s proprietary business decision to require wireless signals in order to connect the iPad to a computer network or the internet. Because Apple Inc. does not provide a software driver to enable the use of a USB-to-Ethernet adapter, the iPad is one of the least-compliant with EDC §§32060-32064 products on the market. Nearly every other computer, laptop, netbook, Chromebook or tablet sold to schools offers a USB-to-Ethernet wired connectivity option, the use of which is required to comply with EDC §§32060-32064.

    Finally, here are informative video slices that are quick to view and easy to understand; you will find more more at

    http://rfemf.com/science.html (especially Dr. Martin Pall’s 9/16/13 Presentation to Portland City Schools re: RF/EMF Microwave Radiation
    http://rfemf.com/links.html (especially Dr. Leif Salford, RF/EMF & the Blood Brain Barrier)

    Dr. Barrie Trower series of 1-2 minute videos

    Dr. Martin Paul 1:12 – 5:15
    http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=1m12s to 5:15 duration 4:15

    Dr. Paul Dart
    Ham Radio Operators
    http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=28m21s to 29:15 duration 0:55

    Sperm Drop
    http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=35m02s to 36:04 duration 1:02

    No Wi-Fi in Schools
    http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=42m47s to 43:30 duration 0:40

    No Wi-Fi in Kreshes
    http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=44m19s to 44:41 duration 0:22

    Dr. Paul Dart
    Wi-Fi Management
    http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=48m50s to 49:24 duration 0:35

    Dr. Martin Paul
    Wi-Fi in Schools
    http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=47m00s to 47:45 duration 0:45

    Laptop & Tablet Shielding
    http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=45m28s to 45:50 duration 0:22

    Dr. Martin Pall & Merry Callahan
    http://youtu.be/HCAyPMVuJHY?t=2m49s to 6:45 duration 4:00

    Dr. Paul Dart
    Russian Exposures
    http://youtu.be/aRn113m1Dkg?t=4m27s to 6:00 duration 1:30

    Calcium Channels
    http://youtu.be/aRn113m1Dkg?t=26m21s to 27:30 duration 1:10

    Damage DNA Chronic basis
    http://youtu.be/i6TxAzXndCg?t=4m19s to 5:13 duration 0:55

    Fertility and WiFi
    http://youtu.be/i6TxAzXndCg?t=12m30s to 14:25 duration 1:55

    Sperm Drop
    http://youtu.be/i6TxAzXndCg?t=18m28s to 19:30 duration 1:02

    http://youtu.be/aRn113m1Dkg?t=20m14s to 21:08 duration 0:50
    http://youtu.be/aRn113m1Dkg?t=21m53s to 23:08 duration 1:20

    Population Control & Microwave Radiation
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LvSGYU_kG0 duration 7:30
    Attachments area
    Preview YouTube video Dr. Martin Pall & Dr. Paul Dart, M.D. Oregon House of Rep. Health Committee Presentation

  7. #10 by Joe Imbriano on September 29, 2015 - 9:29 am

    Who are the bullies in this town? Who are the ones breaking the law and forcing children in Fullerton schools to be exposed to what hundreds of scientists are screaming at the top of their lungs about? Who are the bullies? They are the ones that have turned their backs on everyone’s children to, just like was said, to save their wallets and their hides. If I missed anyone’s photo, please let me know.

    • #11 by Anonymous on September 29, 2015 - 8:11 pm

      So true Joe, so true.

    • #12 by TC on September 29, 2015 - 8:38 pm

      Why is it that the people that are supposed to protect our children are the ones who are doing the unthinkable? If someone was running an illegal car repair business next to a school and exhaust fumes were getting into the classrooms, they would shut it down pronto. I am still scratching my head on this one.

  8. #13 by Sugarman on September 29, 2015 - 11:53 am

    She’s sick too.

    “My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7” (about iPad use)
    Hilda Sugarman, Fullerton School District Trustee

  9. #14 by Anonymous on September 30, 2015 - 10:13 am

    TC the answer is that power and money corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The fact that the public sector leaders are called public servants certainly does not translate into all of them or even most of them acting like public servants. When the mentality of so many in our society is that someone else owes you a good living, free health care, a pension that pays you almost as much as when you had to actually work for a living are indicators of a society drunk on other people’s money and hard work.

  10. #15 by Anonymous on October 1, 2015 - 1:11 pm

    Forget the school district employees. They only care about their jobs. I want to know who the parents are that are demanding this? Where are the parents who should be outraged at what is being done to their children? This is the most bizarre dichotomy I have ever seen in my life.

    • #16 by Parents? on October 1, 2015 - 7:51 pm

      The parents are actually not fit to parent.

    • #17 by Schulze, garden, etc on October 29, 2015 - 10:07 am

      Who? Guessing that it is Dr. Roman Schulz, his wife Garden, FJUHSD parent and Fullerton Observer for high school Dist Vivien Moreno, PTSA at Troy High, Foundation at Troy HS, Anne Sinek (?) she is the one that interviews for Harvard U and keeps all the parents in line by holding those Harvard U recommendations over parents heads. The parents, themselves, are stupid enough to play that game. Troy teacher Jesse Knowles and his wife who hosted a meeting featuring Schulz telling everyone that wireless radiation is safe? Troy teacher and Oracle advisor Cheney that silenced any reporting of health hazards of wireless radiation when her students wanted to write about it. After all, Cheney is the bully and she does not want the other side of the story out about this.

      The parents? Well, they are too busy with other things or in denial about this.

      • #18 by Moreno, Sinek, Knowles etc on October 29, 2015 - 7:54 pm

        What could make these parents sell out their own kids? How can they ignore all of this and work to put wireless radiation in the kid’s classrooms?

        • #19 by Anonymous on October 30, 2015 - 12:17 pm

          Why doesn’t Joe just knock on their door? He lives right next door to the Knowles.

          • #20 by Betsy B on October 30, 2015 - 3:41 pm

            The Knowles’ as well as all these other so-called parents are ignoring everything. SO WHAT’S YOUR POINT??????

          • #21 by anonymous on October 31, 2015 - 10:29 am

            yeah & he should hand them this:

            200+ Scientist Appeal to U.N. and World Health Organization
            Emf exposures are “an emerging health crisis”

            but they would ignore it because they have ignored everything else

        • #22 by Troy pyscho parents on October 30, 2015 - 8:47 pm

          Clearly, they are putting something else above the health and safety of everyone’s children, even their own. They remind me of psychopaths.

      • #23 by Troy mom on October 30, 2015 - 9:55 am

        Joe, did you know the Troy PTSA gave $25000 for wireless chrome books to the district this year? Do you know about this? Are you a member of the PTSA? The next meeting is Monday and I suggest you join and bring yourself up to speed on what is happening.

        • #24 by Reality Is..... on October 30, 2015 - 10:54 am

          Its’ always that way though. Activism involves ignoring many pertinent facts. If they paid attention to all the facts, their cases would be dead. Look at the new BLM movement (KKK) and the immigration movements.

        • #25 by Fullerton High mom on October 30, 2015 - 10:35 pm

          Yes, the PTSA is giving money to irradiate their own kids. Do you think any of them are capable of reading? How about Vivien Moreno, Ann Sinek? Do you think they can read English????

          Defense Intelligence Agency


          Hey, they are making this decision for all of the kids. Once the damage has been done, that’s it. If any of you know these PTSA members, please forward this to all the Troy and Fullerton PTSA parents that are insuring the early demise of the kids.

          • #26 by Troy dad on October 31, 2015 - 9:13 am

            PTSA is operating like the mafia. Is the boss Sinek, with aspirations for running for FJUHSD school board? Isn’t it nice these people that are interested not in the kids’ education but irradiating them ?

            The PTSA mafia here in Fullerton needs to reconsider this one. I hear schools, countries are taking it out and the lawsuits are starting.

            • #27 by Troy HS Mom on October 31, 2015 - 3:51 pm

              Maybe you shouldn’t be so harsh on the PTSA folks, maybe they don’t know. Then, again, I guess you can’t say that for Ms. Moreno if she is present during your comments at the school board, I don’t know how she could not know.

              I just came across this, which all parents should know. It is Atony Brett Bocook

  11. #28 by Mona on October 3, 2015 - 6:51 pm

    Why is this not being covered by the local news and the papers like the Times and the Register? These are serious claims and they involve children. Have you contacted these news outlets?

    • #29 by MS News is "bought" on October 6, 2015 - 3:05 pm

      The mainstream news is owned by a handful of corporations. The Times and Register, that receive advertising income from tech industry, will not cover this. If they were to cover it, it would not be truthful.

      That is part of the reason why getting the information out there is so difficult.

    • #30 by Can We Talk on October 31, 2015 - 10:40 am

      Mona, in the past, I have contacted the editors of the Orange County Register, providing proof that their facts on a news story were wrong and asking for a retraction or a correction. They flatly refused to make the correction and continued to make false and misleading statements in future news stories.
      Big Government equals crony capitalism for the rich and free services for the poor and increasingly middle-class.

      As Government’s tentacles grow longer and longer and larger and larger there are fewer of us to stand up and tell the truth. We live in a country today when almost half the country is in denial and the other half have their sweaty hands in the till. The result is that it is ruining a once great country and its people.

  12. #31 by Weaponized classrooms on October 29, 2015 - 10:41 am

    The many applications of microwave radiation.



  13. #32 by Anonymous on November 3, 2015 - 11:51 am

    Nice neighbors U got huh Joe?

  14. #33 by And now the cancer lawsuits commence on November 28, 2015 - 5:31 pm

    WSJ Reports Murray Cellphone Cancer Case May Cost Wireless Industry Over 1.9 Billion Dollars


  15. #34 by Fullerton Lover on November 29, 2015 - 9:47 am


    The same Teachers and Administrators that have cursed and spat at Joe Imbriano, whenever he valiantly attempted to warn them of the dangers of continually being bombarded with RF exposure, will be the same ones suing the residents of Fullerton for the cancers that they’ll surely develop from being inside of these classrooms all day long being bombarded with wireless devices in the hands of children.

    I honestly think that it’ll take their organs to start lighting up like Rudolph’s nose before they’ll take heed, and by then they’ll be needing to spend their retirements inside of a Faraday cage.


  16. #37 by Fullerton Lover on November 29, 2015 - 3:38 pm

    And to think that she (Pam Keller) actually used to be the Mayor of Fullerton!

    This bully (Pam Keller) is who we have teaching our impressionable elementary school children here in the city of Fullerton.


  17. #40 by Fullerton Lover on November 29, 2015 - 4:14 pm

    Pam Keller’s political donors…


    Did you note that Jan Flory is a supporter/donor to Pam Keller’s campaigns?

  18. #43 by Fullerton Lover on November 29, 2015 - 5:00 pm

    City councilman Doug Chaffee’s wife is also listed as a member on Pam’s Fullerton Collaborative…


    • #44 by Anonymous on November 29, 2015 - 9:35 pm

      Keller, Flory, Chaffee, Fitzgerald, Alvarez, Quirk Silva and the rest of the limousine liberal bleeding heart entourage have been on the same team for a long, long time. Their legacy is self evident and their mission is self perpetuation at the expense of you and I.

  19. #45 by Anonymous on November 30, 2015 - 6:13 am

    The more I look into this, the more alarmed I become. My husband won’t even read this information. I feel so alone and helpless. This is terrible. What is even more disturbing is that it seems like even the officials won’t acknowledge any of this.

    • #46 by another mom on November 30, 2015 - 4:26 pm

      You are correct in that the officials will not acknowledge any of this and they are getting away with immeasurable health harm to the kids.

      They are 180 degrees wrong and the children will pay the price for it.

      I will give Joe I my contact if you would like to work to end this.

(will not be published)

Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!