Step right up and get your Shawn Nelson endorsement. You know the one Bruce Whitaker and Jennifer Fitzgerald wrap themselves in as they both voted to install a SCAG employee Mayan Johnson to the Fullerton planning commission that after repeated requests of mine, they refuse to remove.
Mind you this was a candidate forum that they conveniently tried to not invite me too.
Nelson refers to SCAG as “esoteric” Listen to this Agenda 21 Orwellian double speak SCAG operative- County Supervisor Shawn Nelson and listen carefully as he talks out of both sides of his mouth. This is our County Supervisor ladies and gentlemen whose wife runs the local Republican Women Federated Group in Fullerton.
This is a video I did after the events of the day of October 1st. This is our County Supervisor ladies and gentlemen whose wife runs the local Republican Women Federated Group in Fullerton as I discuss below. This Fullerton RWF group has courted Fitzgerald and now Bennett as they prepare to build out Fullerton to the hilt unless we throw them out. Fullerton has been hijacked and everyone is being put to sleep by these phony coffee clutch groups.
#1 by Oat Soda on October 18, 2016 - 12:48 am
Here’s what I’d say to Shawn Nelson. Take the twenty minutes and explain to your deserving audience of constituents what SCAG is all about. Give them the respect and dignity of explaining it. That audience in the video is, I’m sure, quite intelligent regardless of age and Nelson’s glossing over the topic is pathetic. You are a public servant, work with gratitude toward the people that elected you.
I voted for Shawn in the past, before I awoke to the facts of local politics. His utterly corrupt dealings with the homeless shelter proposal on St. College illustrates how he plays the game. Cameron Irons, a Nelson associate, stood to make hundreds of thousands of dollars on the deal, leaving the neighborhood with a homeless shelter a block away from Commonwealth Elementary School. Cameron Irons is an individual who was taken to court by a teenage employee for gratuity theft-the case being so petty and ridiculous I cannot imagine myself in a similar position.
An open book on SCAG and city planning would ease the concerns of citizens, but there are obviously difficult topics and concerns that elected officials feel they are entitled to shut the public out of. Why is that? The people in the audience, the citizens, are deserving of an in depth explanation, out of simple due diligence. This is an abuse of our political process and must be fixed. It is also the exact reason why an existential level of disgust exists between an educated, hard working and earning public and an entitled, cynical political class, stem to stern.
My suggestions would be:
-tell the truth, regardless of consequence.
-don’t engage in insider dealings that benefit yourself
-realize that the voting public is intelligent. Many voters are highly intelligent and engaged in decades-long careers, they do not choose to enter politics. Do not underestimate them.