Jan Weiner speaks
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on February 5, 2014
I guess it is a good living making money off of the Autism epidemic and the special education explosion while breathing exhaust fumes next to the 57 freeway.
Meet Jan Weiner
http://ed.fullerton.edu/sped/faculty/jan-s-weiner-ph-d/
Looks like out of all of those in key positions that were in receipt of this email https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-fullerton-five-part-2-for-the-health-of-our-children-can-reason-prevail/, this one was the first to step right up to the microphone. Here is just a little background on her right here – http://ed.fullerton.edu/sped/faculty/jan-s-weiner-ph-d/. Read the rest of this entry »
A tale of two cities and The Glendale Five
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on February 5, 2014
Hats off to our northern Agenda 21 city neighbors in Glendale. These five school board members have proceeded much like the wireless leadfoot Pletka and the Fullerton five as they all step on the gas racing to the Connect Ed, common core, microwave matrix, wireless classroom radiation chamber finish line for our kids. Read the rest of this entry »
JUNK SCIENCE: 70/30 with some wireless industry dough gets you 50/50 and your kids the shaft in the wireless classrooms.
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on February 5, 2014
The following is an excellent article from : http://www.seattlemag.com/article/nerd-report/nerd-report
This is must read!
UW Scientist Henry Lai Makes Waves in the Cell Phone Industry
Naomi Ishisaka | January 2011 | FROM THE PRINT EDITION
|
A greeting card on bioengineering professor Henry Lai’s office wall at the University of Washington contains this quotation from Ralph Waldo Emerson: “Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.”
This philosophy could well sum up Lai’s work on the effects of low-level radiation on DNA, as well as what he believes should be the guiding principle of science: independent investigation and research leading to discovery for the public good. Yet the soft-spoken scientist’s steadfast belief in that principle has placed his research at the center of a persistent global controversy and created powerful enemies that tried to get him fired and essentially succeeded in drying up the source of funding for the type of research he was doing.
Lai admits that he was naive. He came to the UW in 1972 and earned a doctorate in psychology. Two decades later, as a bioengineering researcher, he studied esoteric scientific topics in relative obscurity. He and a fellow researcher, Narendra “N.P.” Singh, were looking at the effects of nonionizing microwave radiation—the same type of radiation emitted by cell phones—on the DNA of rats. They used a level of radiation considered safe by government standards and found that the DNA in the brain cells of the rats was damaged—or broken—by exposure to the radiation. Ironically, cell phones weren’t even on Lai’s mind when he performed the initial studies. Funded initially by the Office of Naval Research, Lai was investigating how radar, which emits radio-frequency radiation, affects the health of operators. “We did not really pay attention to the importance of this thing,” he recalls. But during his research, cell phone giant Motorola Inc. indicated that someone had told the company about Lai’s unpublished results. Motorola asked to meet with him in his lab and at a meeting in Copenhagen.
After Lai and Singh’s research finding an effect on DNA was published in 1995, Lai learned of a full-scale effort to discredit his work. In an internal company memo leaked to Microwave News, a publication that examines health and environmental effects of electromagnetic radiation, Motorola described its plan to “war-game” and undermine Lai’s research. After initially accepting industry funding for continued research from the Wireless Technology Research (WTR) program (created to manage $25 million in research funds), Lai and Singh wrote an open letter to Microwave News questioning restrictions placed on their research by the funders. After that, the head of WTR sent a memo asking then-UW president Richard McCormick to fire Lai and Singh. McCormick refused, but the dustup sent a clear message to Lai and his colleagues.
“This shocked me,” Lai says, “the letter trying to discredit me, the ‘war games’ memo. As a scientist doing research, I was not expecting to be involved in a political situation. It opened my eyes on how games are played in the world of business.”
Thus was launched an epic battle over research and truth. If Lai and Singh were correct about the potential impact on brain cells from radio-frequency radiation, there could be billions of dollars on the line for the cell phone industry in potential liability, leading to significant design changes and lost market expansion.
To the layperson, the science behind Lai’s work, which was largely funded by the National Institutes of Health, and industry-funded research to contradict it is mind-numbingly complex. Virtually every assertion of risk has a counterassertion of no risk. For every independent study showing damage to DNA and memory, there is a study showing the opposite.
Lai, 61, says this phenomenon could be a direct result of the way science is now funded around the world. “[The U.S. was on] the cutting edge of this whole area for the last 30 years. [But] right now, we’re the Third World country. We’re not doing research at all,” Lai says. With government funding all but nonexistent, the bulk of scientific research is funded by private industry. “The mechanism is funding,” Lai says. “You don’t bite the hand that feeds you. The pressure is very impressive.”
The massive Interphone study, coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and released in May 2010, exemplifies these challenges.
Purported to be the definitive word on cell phone radiation and brain tumors, Interphone involved 13 countries (all outside the U.S.), $25 million, and thousands of tumor patients and controls. Conducted over 10 years, the widely anticipated study was supposed to at last provide clarity on the risks of cell phone use. Yet, once again, the science was divided. The day after the study’s release, headlines read, “No answer, just fuzz, from cell phone study,” and, “One conclusion emerges from Interphone study: Controversy will continue.”
Why, after so much money and time, were the data so mixed? Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News, says there were a number of problems with Interphone. “When we started interviewing the protagonists,” he says, “we realized there was a lot of conflict going on. It was a bitter struggle. It tells you the interpretation of the data is not clear cut in any way.”
For the purposes of the Interphone study, a person who used a cell phone 30 minutes a day for more than 10 years was considered to be subjected to heavy exposure. Today, that level of cell phone use (900 minutes a month) is average. The people defined as the most heavily exposed in the Interphone study now represent the average user.
To illustrate that point, Elisabeth Cardis, head of the Interphone study, was quoted as saying, “In my personal opinion, I think we have a number of elements that suggest a possible increased risk among the heaviest users, and because the heaviest users in our study are considered the low users today, I think that’s something of concern. Until stronger conclusions can be drawn one way or another, it may be reasonable to reduce one’s exposure.”
Lai’s frustration with the increasing body of contradictory research led him to do an analysis in 2006 of the available studies on cell phone radiation between 1990 and 2006, and where their funding came from. What he found was that 50 percent of the 326 studies showed a biological effect from radio-frequency radiation and 50 percent did not. But when he filtered the studies into two stacks—those funded by the wireless industry and those funded independently—Lai discovered industry-funded studies were 30 percent likely to find an effect, as opposed to 70 percent of the independent studies.
Lai says that, while his findings highlight the crucial role industry funding plays in scientific research, the 50-50 split alone should be cause for concern. “Even if you accept all the industry studies, you still end up with 50-50,” he says. “How could 50 percent all be garbage? People always start with the statement ‘Hundreds of studies have been done on this topic, and no effect has been found,’ but this is a very misleading statement. [The statements] come out from the cell phone industry, and people just use it, like the American Cancer Society. People haven’t even gone in to look at the real studies and look at the effects that people have reported. This really worries me, because people come out and say things without the facts.”
Slesin agrees and says Lai’s work is important for the research that does show effects from radiation. “[Lai] is one of the most widely cited scientists in this field,” Slesin says.
The American Cancer Society did not reply to requests for an interview. Its official position on the risks of cell phone use states: “Radio frequency (RF) waves given off by cell phones don’t have enough energy to damage DNA directly. Because of this, many scientists believe that cell phones aren’t able to cause cancer. Most studies done in the lab have supported this theory, finding that RF waves do not cause DNA damage.”
CTIA-The Wireless Association, the cell phone industry trade organization, also declined to comment for this story, but its website states: “To date, global health organizations believe that the available scientific evidence does not show that any health problems are associated with using wireless phones. Many studies of low-level RF exposure, such as that which occurs with wireless devices, have not discovered any negative biological effects.”
Dr. Beth Mueller, an epidemiologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, acknowledges that there is not strong evidence linking cell phones to brain tumors. But Mueller warns that the research is difficult and that much more study is needed. “I think [cell phone radiation] would be important to study. There are no studies I know of on the possible impact on children and I think it’s something that many people–including some people here at the Hutch–want to see evaluated. I’m concerned because children are using [cell phones] a lot. It’s something that should be looked at, definitely.”
Katy Rock would agree. The Kirkland resident is an athletic 31-year-old who began having headaches in her late teens. “Headaches became an unwelcome fact of life for me in college,” she says, “at first always after running around on the soccer or lacrosse field. So I assumed for years that it was due to dehydration/nutrition problems or just being out of shape. Eventually, they got worse. I started having them with no explainable cause.”
It wasn’t until a she had a seizure in 2007 that Rock discovered something was terribly wrong. The next day, she underwent an emergency double craniotomy to remove a tumor the size of a small lemon from her right frontal lobe and two tumors the size of large grapes from her right temporal lobe. A biopsy showed the cancerous tumors had been growing for about 10 years. A year of chemotherapy followed.
Rock was an early adopter of cell phones. Given a phone as a gift during college in 1997, she recalls using it about two to three hours a week (about 630 minutes a month). Her usage increased in later years with a job that required her to be on call. She is right-handed, and her tumors were on the right side.
Rock, who recently completed her first 5K run in support of Seattle Children’s Hospital’s Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Guild, would not be surprised to find a link between cell phones and brain tumors. “When I was in college, I used to charge my cell phone at night, and the charger cord ran over a leaf of my philodendron plant,” she says. “Over time, the strip on the leaf where the cord touched turned brown. The small amount of power running through the cord was enough to kill some cells of the otherwise healthy plant.”
While Rock’s tale is merely metaphorical, its suggestive import is not lost on Devra Davis, Ph.D., a huge admirer of Lai’s work to raise awareness about the potential hazards of cell phone radiation. Davis is a longtime toxicologist, public health expert and founder of the Wyoming-based Environmental Health Trust, a group that provides basic research and training on environmental health hazards. Davis’ most recent book, released last October, is Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation. Davis calls Lai a “hero” for his groundbreaking work. “[Lai] has made a tremendous impact on the field in many aspects. Not just on the field of DNA, but on the brain, on receptors. In a fair and just world he would be a serious candidate for the Nobel Prize, because he did foundational research on the way the body responds to electromagnetic and radiofrequency radiation and because he persisted in the face of many challenges. He’s been outstanding and indomitable in the face of opposition that would have overwhelmed most people.”
In her book, Davis describes a disconnect between the general public’s largely unquestioning acceptance of cell phone radiation and the large body of evidence suggesting cause for concern. With Lai’s work as her foundation, Davis demonstrates a pattern of the cell phone industry’s scientific manipulation spanning decades. Davis is particularly concerned because the rate of cell phone use by children is skyrocketing—with three out of four 12-year-olds and half of 10-years-olds in the U.S. now possessing a cell phone. Even more troubling: Lennart Hardell, Ph.D., a researcher in Sweden, found that those who began using cell phones in their teens (such as Rock) had four to five times the number of malignant tumors by their late 20s as those who did not use cell hones as teenagers.
While Davis would argue that there is a proven, causal link between cell phones and tumors, Lai does not. What he does say is that there is enough reason for concern, and that a “precautionary principle” should be embraced, as France has done in warning against cell phone use by children, and as San Francisco has done in mandating information on “specific absorption rates” of radiation on cell phone packaging.
“European countries generally believe you need some kind of precautionary approach,” says Lai, who does not own—or use—a cell phone. “What else can we do? Obviously, we don’t know the answer at all. But, then, there is a cause for concern. We need to take some kind of precautionary action.” For now, however, Lai will continue to do research on the drug artemisinin—long used by Chinese herbalists—for applications in cancer treatment, because there is no longer any independent funding available for his research on the effects of nonionizing radiation.
Meanwhile, Davis, who uses a cell phone but only with a headset or as a speakerphone (she never keeps it close to her body), hopes that by the time the public realizes the importance of the path Lai has been on, it won’t be too late. In Disconnect, she wonders how our grandchildren will answer these questions: “Did we do the right thing and act to protect them? Or did we harm them needlessly, irresponsibly and permanently, blinded by the addictive delights of our technological age?”
_______________________________________________
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WIRELESS TABLETS, LAPTOPS AND IPADS EMIT MORE RADIATION THAN A CELL PHONE. YOUR CHILDREN ARE USING IPADS FOR MORE THAN 900 MINUTES A MONTH. THEY USE THEM FOR AT LEAST 900 MINUTES A WEEK AT SCHOOL. WHAT ABOUT AT HOME?
WHERE ARE THE IPADS KEPT WHILE IN USE? WHERE IS THE WIFI ANTENNA LOCATED IN THE IPAD?
DO YOU WANT YOUR KIDS TO HAVE KIDS? EXTRAPOLATE FROM THERE and KEEP DENYING BECAUSE YOU CANT FOR VERY MUCH LONGER.
DID ROMAN SCHULZE EVER GET BACK TO THE THE G.U.S.D. BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON WHY EUROPEANS ARE BANNING WIFI IN SCHOOLS? MAYBE HE NEEDS TO GET BACK IN TOUCH WITH HIS ROOTS ACROSS THE ATLANTIC.
————————————
The French assembly DID IT- NEW LAW PENDING ON EMF/RF
NFL Super Bowl XLVIII
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on February 4, 2014
YOU THOUGHT IT WAS JUST A LOUSY GAME?
It’s where we are folks.
……..and the band played on WHILE THE RESULTS CAME TUMBLING IN. Read the rest of this entry »
The public sidewalk, free speech, our children’s health
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on January 29, 2014
An 87 year old grandmother asked if this is Nazi Germany at Acacia Elementary School in Fullerton California as the school called the cops on her and other law abiding moms passing out fliers
———- Forwarded message ———-
Date: Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:07 PM
Subject: The public sidewalk, free speech and our children’s health.
To: Karen Whisnant <karen_whisnant@fullertonsd.org>
Cc: Robert Pletka <bob_pletka@fullertonsd.org>, Chris Thompson <cstfullerton@gmail.com>, council@cityoffullerton.com, dhughes@fullertonpd.org, “Rep. Ed Royce” <CA39ERima@mail.house.gov>, Davis Barber <davis@fullertonstories.com>, observernews@earthlink.net, Beverly Berryman <bev_berryman@att.net>, lynn thornley <lynn_thornley@fullertonsd.org>, Hilda Sugarman <hilda_sugarman@fullertonsd.org>, janny meyer <janny_meyer@fullertonsd.org>, “GGIOKARIS@fjuhsd.net” <GGIOKARIS@fjuhsd.net>, Mar Buc <JWILLIAMS@fjuhsd.net>, david morrison <wirelesswatch@yahoo.com>, “Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org” <Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org>, “PTA@theacaciapartnership.org” <PTA@theacaciapartnership.org>
Dear Dr. Whisnant,
THE FULLERTON FIVE PART 2- For the health of our children, can reason prevail?
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on January 28, 2014
Today another group in Fullerton has decided to address the FSD Board of Trustess. Lets see if the Fullerton Five still read their mail. This email was sent to me by a fellow colleague and is worthy of a post. It appears to have been produced and sent by a group called FCSST which stands for Fullerton Community for Safe School Technology. I don’t know about you but I should be a card carrying member by now and so should the rest of you. Here is the email that was sent to me:
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Fullerton Community <safeschooltechnology@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Fullerton, California School District Trustees: For the health of our children, can reason prevail?
To: janny_meyer@fullertonsd.org, chris_thompson@fullertonsd.org, lynn_thornley@fullertonsd.org, beverly_berryman@fullertonsd.org, hilda_sugarman@fullertonsd.org Read the rest of this entry »
Back when it was bought with a price and how today it sells for 30 pieces of silver.
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on January 26, 2014
by Merijoe and Anonymous
Government uses innocent Americans, by force, to advance their agendas.
In the late 1950’s, many of you will remember an American Western television program portraying Chuck Conners as rancher Lucas McCain and Johnny Crawford as his young son, Mark. The iconic show known as “The Rifleman” was filmed in black and white, set in the 1880’s western genre. Connors cast as McCain was a tough, but fair and trusting man of God who lived by fairness, honor, decency and morality, and he taught his son each of these moral characteristics. His uncanny expertise with a rifle, hence the name, came into play in every episode as he protected the weak or set wrongs to right in a simple morality play we don’t see in today’s television programming.
In several episodes, a villain would apply coercive pressure to McCain, demanding that he provide information or identify someone under duress. In each
instance, McCain refused, often at great cost to himself.
A few days ago I was speaking with a friend who told me her story. I found the plot very similar in that the same kinds of tactics were applied by federal agents who strong-armed her in what passes for an ‘investigation’ these days. The circumstances were so similar, I couldn’t miss the obvious.
She was set up by an individual she knew who was coerced into selling her something that unbeknownst to her was illegal. The person was strong armed by the feds and in an effort to save their own skin, was willing to entice my friend into unknowing crimes to reduce their own sentence. She was charged with a crime she didn’t commit and offered the same plan to avoid prosecution. If my friend would only ‘roll-over’ on others, her freedom could be ‘purchased’ by ratting out, and setting up others in the same line of business.
She refused not only because she didn’t know anyone who was guilty of the crime they sought, but she was unwilling to rat out, or entrap other innocent people. Because she refused their offer of ‘employment’, refusing to work for them even though she knew that she faced prison, they offered her a plea deal and when she refused that, they threatened her spouse with prosecution and children with being thrown into the foster care system.
Obviously under threat, she signed the plea deal and served her time. She had no prior records, and has never done anything illegal before, or since.
She spent several years in a federal penitentiary, is now classified as an unemployable felon and her life and the lives of her family will never be the same.
Like McCain in “The Rifleman”, she could have simply been as weak-minded as the person who set her up, she could have done what they demanded of her to save her own skin, but she didn’t and she paid a terrible price for her integrity. The “Rifleman” may have been a made up show but the characteristics of Lucas McCain and my friend, ring similar and so do the villain’s.
Unlike a simple moral play on television, in today’s world, the villain in our story is the rising police state where every ‘agency’ in the government has a law enforcement division. These agencies operate on the same lines as the TV villains using the same tactics of coercion and intimidation. They violate the law with impunity using the Machiavellian excuse that the ‘ends justify the means’, but wrong can never be used for good.
Unlike a half hour television episode, people who are coerced by law enforcement don’t have a neatly packaged ending where all is well. Millions of great Americans are coerced every year so that tickets can be punched and ‘notches’ scrawled in the grips of the proverbial guns of our police state minions.
It takes sacrifice and unselfish courage to be a man or woman of integrity today. We laud our soldiers but we would do well to remember that they are not all serving in a formal branch of the military. There are many civilians who do their part to keep us safe from the enemy.
Thank you to my friend and a lot of other American patriots I don’t know, who have, and are currently, fighting and sacrificing themselves for my freedom. You are inspiring.
FSD’S ROBERT PLETKA: RECOGNIZING VOLTAGE POTENTIAL
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on December 30, 2013
THIS PHOTO REPRESENTS A FULLERTON STUDENT ENGAGING WITH HIS 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DEVICE. THE IPAD HAS 5 ANTENAE AND THE WIFI ANTENNA IS LOCATED LITERALLY RIGHT ON HIS ZIPPER. NEED I SAY ANYMORE?
YES THE PHOTO WAS SO PROUDLY DISPLAYED ON THE FSD SUPERINTENDENT’S PUBLIC FACEBOOK PAGE LINKED UP ON THE DISTRICT’S OWN WEBSITE HERE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=479084712158056&set=a.467172693349258.106292.467056220027572&type=1&theater. Read the rest of this entry »
GLENDALE UNIFIED’S VERY OWN MARY BOGER ON THE FULLERTON INFORMER: JUNK SCIENCE, BULLYING AND FEAR MONGERING
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on December 22, 2013
No, sorry Charlie, no cigar.
We over at The Fullerton Informer, instead, like to refer to all of her on camera derogatory implications as “inconvenient truths”, “advocacy for children’s health protected by the first amendment”, and “stepping on the exposed toes of those who aimlessly appear to walk what we believe to be a dangerous party line”. Read the rest of this entry »
THE FULLERTON FIVE
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on December 15, 2013
After 9 steady hot and heavy months of attempting to persuade the five board members of the FSD to put the brakes on the district’s wireless radiation filled technology program, Read the rest of this entry »
Help us end the largest forced irradiation of school children that the world has ever seen.
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on December 8, 2013
Your children are sitting under these all day at school.
THE PHOTO OF THE ABOVE CHILD IS A PUBLICLY SHARED PHOTO FROM THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA’S FACEBOOK PAGE WHICH IS LINKED UP ON THE DISTRICTS OWN WEBSITE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=479084712158056&set=a.467172693349258.106292.467056220027572&type=1&ref=nf
We have to consider the time-value of exposure for our children: how much radiation over time.
Start with micro waving a potato for example:
100% power x 5 minutes = 1 cooked potato
50% power x 10 minutes = 1 cooked potato
Total RF/EMF radiation over 10 years = serious health problems for our kids
Why take this risk?
FCC and OSHA officials agreed how to calculate total cumulative RF/EMF in a classroom, but the FCC guideline doesn’t consider this concept at all.
http://rfemf.com/presentation/
LET US NOW LOOK AT A CLASSROOM IN PETALUMA CALIFORNIA: http://rfemf.com/counter.html#calcs
FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA REFUSES TO SHUT THESE SYSTEMS OFF WHILE HE STATES THAT THIS IS “TOTALLY SAFE FOR OUR KIDS” http://fsd.k12.ca.us/parent_resources/files/wireless.pdf
TO THIS DATE, THE CURRENT FULLERTON SCHOOL BOARD HAS REMAINED EERILY SILENT ON THIS ISSUE IGNORING AND DOING NOTHING TO STOP THIS IN SPITE OF ALL THAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THEM VIA EMAIL AND AT BOARD MEETINGS.
WE BELIEVE THAT THIS IS AN UNAUTHORIZED FORCED IRRADIATION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN. THERE ARE NO STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF THESE DEVICES ON CHILDREN OR STUDENTS IN THE CLASSROOM SETTING. ARE YOUR CHILDREN ARE THE TEST SUBJECTS?
TELL OUR REPRESENTATIVES THAT WE WILL HAVE NO PART OF IT. HELP US END IT. THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING OF THE DEVICES THAT WILL BE DEPLOYED IN THESE MICROWAVE MATRIX COMMON CORE COMPLIANT CLASSROOMS.
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Agenda 21, Are they turning their backs on the children?, Eugenics, Forced irradiation of school children, FORCED VACCINATIONS, Hidden in plain view on December 6, 2013
POOF! PRESTO!
from Microsoft Windows 8-to some a space needle and a neat photo-to those who can see-it is all laid out-a massive monument to the tools of depopulation-the syringe, RF emissions, and the entities involved in bringing it to fruition all hidden in plain view.
Gates’ dream
ANY QUESTIONS?
BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS-GROUND ZERO FOR FORCED VACCINATIONS- Do you see these three arches in the picture of peopleless Seattle above erected as monuments to mission accomplished-depopulation
BILL GATES PUSHING VACCINES
WHAT THEY WILL DO TO EVERYONE IF WE DON’T STOP THEM
WIRELESS IS THE OTHER HALF OF THE EQUATION-
https://thefullertoninformer.com/honesty-is-such-a-lonely-word/
Will a $666.66 price tag a generation later, get you right into the laps of every school age child in America?
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Eugenics, Forced irradiation of school children on December 1, 2013
THE FOLLOWING IS A PUBLICLY SHARED PHOTO FROM THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA’S FACEBOOK PAGE WHICH IS LINKED UP ON THE DISTRICTS OWN WEBSITE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=479084712158056&set=a.467172693349258.106292.467056220027572&type=1&ref=nf
THIS CHILD HAS A MICROWAVE TRANSMITTER THAT EMITS PULSE MODULATED MICROWAVE RADIATION WITH PEAK LEVELS POTENTIALLY TRILLIONS OF TIMES THE NORMAL BACKGROUND LEVELS RIGHT SMACK DAB IN HIS LAP IN DIRECT PROXIMITY TO THE CHILD’S SENSITIVE DEVELOPING REPRODUCTIVE AREA. THIS IS IN HIS CLASSROOM WHERE THE DEVICE IS UP AND RUNNING FOR MOST OF THE DAY. WHAT DO YOU THINK HAPPENS AT HOME?
$666.66 LIST PRICE $666.66 INVOICE
In all of my years on this planet with thousands of trips to the brick and mortar stores and online shopping, I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING PRICED AT $666.66? Have you? Well back in 1976 you may have been too busy waiting for the Freedom Train to roll into town, watching the midnite special or perhaps it was simply before your time. Ladies and gentlemen, I believe that back then some folks launched their flagship with some down right eerie coordinates that will lead your children right into the optometrist, the oncologist and last stop is the fertility doctor’s office. Some 40 years later, what’s still in your face now is the black apple of somebody’s eye with a “byte” out of it. So what is going on with these WiFi systems and these devices?
WHILE OBAMA IS RAMMING HIS WIRELESS BROADBAND AGENDA INTO EVERY LAST SCHOOL IN AMERICA:
HOW DID APPLE GET THE TECHNOLOGY MONOPOLY IN THE SCHOOLS?
WHAT THE HECK ARE THESE MICROWAVE TRANSMITTERS DOING TO THE SENSITIVE DEVELOPING REPRODUCTIVE AREAS OF THESE CHILDREN?
GIRLS ARE BORN WITH THEIR IMMATURE FOLLICLES THAT BECOME EGGS.
WHAT ARE THESE DEVICES DOING TO THEIR EGGS?
Are the female eggs undergoing an electrically induced “fast block” as a result of point blank wireless microwave exposure?
A fast block is a zona reaction that takes plane in the zona pellucida of the female egg. The cortical cells combine with the plasma membrane and calcify rendering the egg impenetrable to sperm.
ARE THE NON-THERMAL EFFECTS OF WIRELESS RADIATION RESULTING IN STRUCTURAL ISOMERISM IN THE YOUNG GIRLS INSULIN RECEPTORS? IS THE WIRELESS EXPOSURE BEHIND THE CURRENT OUT OF CONTROL EPIDEMIC OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME IN OUR ADOLESCENTS?
ARE THESE EMISSIONS HARDENING THE ZONA PELLUCIDA RENDERING IT IMPENETRABLE?
Will in vitro fertilization via syringe be the only way to conceive? Will your children have access to these procedures? In Vitro is not covered by the fed’s essential health benefits. The man behind the WiFi push in the schools with his Connect -Ed program , Mr. Obama, is also the same man who has forced the United States into the ACA plans-the new health care program which does not include coverage for in-vitro procedures. The ACA plans do include all the coverage that you would ever need to kill your unborn child or drug your body silly with all kinds of long and short term birth control options.
IS THIS BY DESIGN? IS THERE A STEALTH AGENDA TO AFFECT HUMAN FERTILITY?
ARE THE SCHOOLS INVOLVED?
ARE THE PARENTS INVOLVED BY LOADING THEIR HOMES UP WITH WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY THAT THE GOVERNMENT AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS ASSURE THEM IS TOTALLY SAFE?
Remember these are our children, that they depend on us for protection and the future depends on them being protected. There will be no future if their reproductive future has been stolen from them. It is foolish to trust people you don’t know, in places so high and far away that you will never meet, about a danger that most people do not understand, that most people would never suspect, with what you and I and the rest of humanity has taken for granted for the last 6,000 years: our and our children’s reproductive capabilities. So many today pharmaceutically and prophylactically attempt control or thwart it. No one that I know, however, is ready to willingly relinquish it, much less surrender that of their children. Do not kid yourself folks. I believe that there are those in the highest positions of power that are hell bent on doing just that. It is flat out dangerous to think that the technology has not yet arrived to carry out the most insidious of agendas.
I think it is flat out shameful, to be a school official or a parent and willingly ignore all of this :https://thefullertoninformer.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/ because I believe if you do just that, it spells the beginning of the end of the line for what you and I once were:
Could this spell the end of what our kids will someday assume they were entitled to as a God given right? Will they ask us why we didn’t fight for it and for them? What then will you tell them my friends, what will you look them in the eyes and tell them? https://thefullertoninformer.com/what-is-wifi-doing-to-your-daughters/
Wireless technology DOES NOT BELONG IN THE CLASSROOM PERIOD! COMPUTERS CAN AND DO, AS LONG AS THEY ARE HARD WIRED.
I believe that of all the sins in the world, that cowardice is by far the worst of them all. It is because of this one that all the rest are allowed to flourish, spread and run their destructive course driving humanity right off the cliff into an abyss. Look at what is happening to our children’s minds with the music, TV, movies, video games and yes even some of the curriculum in the schools. The war for their souls being patently obvious, is already well underway. Right now ladies and gentlemen, this whole kit and kaboodle is on the line and hidden in plain view for all to see. Wake up and rescue your children and your family’s lineage. It will be 10-20 or even 25 years before you will know and by then it will be too late.
LAUSD just got soaked for over a billion dollars on this wireless waste and now 60 million a year will soon be needed to keep the microwave transmitters ticking away:
http://www.latimes.com/local/
la-me-1120-lausd-ipads- 20131120,0,429771.story#tugs_ story_display
IS THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS? You decide for yourself.
https://thefullertoninformer.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/
INSERT FOOT IN MOUTH
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on October 24, 2013
Torlakson and Silva just couldn’t do the right thing so they just had the stool pigeon write the apology.
Press Release
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on October 23, 2013
California State of Education Event Attendees Get Surprise Message from Fullerton Group
Recent Comments