MORE CENSORSHIP ON NEXTDOOR NEIGHBOR AS THE FULLERTON IRRADIATOR LIST EXPANDS.
It is amazing how a realtor named Michelle Lynch is so deathly afraid of this information getting out to the residents in Fullerton. Is it because she does not want to admit what this is doing to children and perhaps her own?
She accuses me of using the app as a soap box, for political purposes and then every time wireless dangers are discussed, the post gets taken down by her.
To make matters worse, she encourages others to block future posts by of course, me.
|
HERE IS WHAT THEY, HAVING ALREADY TURNED THEIR BACKS ON THE CHILDREN, ARE DEATHLY AFRAID OF GETTING OUT-THE TRUTH ABOUT THE FORCED IRRADIATION OF ALL OF US THAT IS BEING PLANNED BY OUR ELECTED LEADERS.
It is time to protect our neighborhoods. This is important.
from Raymond Hills
When it rains, it pours. Two days ago I sent an update asking folks to request their legislators co-sponsor MA bills on EMFs (please still do that). Then we learned something big is up at the Federal level. Below is an email I am sending to my contacts, please feel free to use any of it if it might help with your efforts too…
Most of you may know it’s more my style to present information on wireless radiation and let folks
decide what to do with it. Today, however, it takes me out of my comfort zone but I need to ask for your explicit help in our democratic process –realizing it may take you out of your comfort zone too.
The FCC and industry are fast-tracking legislation that would take authority away from our municipalities in deciding whether or not we want the infrastructure needed for 5G and
the Internet of Things. They did this back in 1997 too when they circumvented safety testing on cell phone technology then got the Telecommunications Act passed. That left our local authorities powerless as the industry put cell towers near homes, schools, hospitals, churches and senior housing. Many have become very ill, with no recourse.
Now the FCC and industry are trying to push through two bills in D.C. that will put small but extremely hazardous cell antennas in our neighborhoods on all utility poles right outside our homes, schools, offices, everywhere! The 5G signal will carry huge doses of data faster, but not very far so the industry wants to install millions and millions of these small cell antennas to carry the data from pole to pole. 5G will also use 3G and 4G technology so existing towers won’t come down; 5G will add to the electrosmog. These small cell antennas will pulse biologically hazardous microwave radiation at us 24/7 at close range, in some cases right outside your window.
The way the Telecom Act is written today, industry is supposed to submit an application to city officials to put in antennas, and these new bills are trying to override this control measure for local authorities. Why is the FCC and industry in such a rush? The U.S. National Toxicology Program is in the middle of reporting out findings from a $25M multi-year study that has already found this radiation causes DNA damage, brain and heart tumors. More findings will come out in 2017.
Setting aside the agenda behind wireless, the industry leaders are not concerned with public health, they just want to be first to market. As soon as the NTP findings came out, they pushed to get approval to use the 5G spectrum. The Cellular Telephone Industry Association (CTIA-The Wireless Association) did its own big cancer study in the 1990s which showed the same findings, but they didn’t inform the public. Instead, they crafted the Telecom Act and pushed cell phones and infrastructure on an unsuspecting public. Then they introduced wi-fi which exposes us even further indoors, and now they plan to roll out the Internet of Things and blanket our neighborhoods in radiation.
Please, don’t take my word on all of this, when you have time I encourage you to investigate on your own (thank you, Katie Singer, author of Invisible Silent Spring, and others for this great resource on these two bills, and thank you world scientists for the EMF Scientists web site which presents the facts on wireless radiation).
But for today, we need your voice (and every adult’s in your house) in two ways:
1. Call your U.S. Senators’ office with the following message; you can read it to the person who answers the phone, or leave it in voice mail. Phone numbers are given at the end of this email:
My name is ______ from (city/state) and I am calling to ask the Senator to Vote NO on MOBILE Now Act S.19 and DIGIT Act S.88 to stop 5G infrastructure and rollout of the Internet of Things. The National Toxicology Program has found the electromagnetic radiation used by wireless technology causes DNA damage, and brain and heart tumors. Non-industry funded studies all over the world report other short-and long-term biological effects, ranging from infertility, Alzheimer’s and autism to digital addiction, insomnia, headaches, skin rashes, learning disabilities, behavioral issues, depression, anxiety and more. Please VOTE NO on the MOBILE Now Act S.19 and DIGIT Act S.88. Please insist on public hearings, and send a clear message to industry that they need to work with non-industry funded scientists to develop biologically safe technology. Thank you.
2. Email your U.S. Senators with the following message; email links are given below:
Subject: Please Vote NO on MOBILE Now Act S.19 and DIGIT Act S.88
The National Toxicology Program has found the electromagnetic field (EMF) of radiation emitted by wireless technology causes DNA damage, and brain and heart tumors. Non-industry funded studies all over the world report other short-and long-term biological effects, ranging from infertility, Alzheimer’s and autism to digital addiction, insomnia, headaches, nausea, nose/ear bleeds, skin rashes, cognitive impairment, learning disabilities, behavioral issues, depression, anxiety and more. Children, fetuses, the elderly and those with known health compromises are especially vulnerable. See www.emfscientist.org.
If this subject is new to you, you will likely have questions as we have all rapidly adopted wireless technology into our lives. Please read this high-level three-page overview titled, “EMF Points of Confusion vs. Fact” at
TinyURL.com/EMF-Facts.
The FCC and industry are trying to fast-track these bills which will take away local authority from communities to decide whether they want toxic 5G/Internet of Things infrastructure installed at the street-level on poles right outside homes, schools, and offices. Please insist on public hearings, and send a clear message to industry that they need to work with non-industry funded scientists to develop biologically safe technology. Retired Microsoft Canada President Frank Clegg assures us they can, if given a nudge. See https://vimeo.com/134411701.
Please VOTE NO on the MOBILE Now Act S.19 and DIGIT Act S.88. Thank you.
This is how the system works. They log your call, then print out your email for the legislator. Multiple calls and emails get their attention. If there is no activity, or very little, the industry wins.
Thank you for taking the time to read this email. I hope you will take another ten minutes to call and send an email to your legislators before your head hits the pillow tonight. The Senate will vote on this any day now, and most do not even know wireless is hazardous yet. They’ve only heard the benefits from persuasive industry lobbyists.
Thank you for the courage to use your voice in a way that might really make a difference in our world! Pass this on to your friends and family all over the country as this affects us all.
—————————————————————————————————————–
US SENATORS BY STATE – 115TH CONGRESS January 2017
CALIFORNIA:
Feinstein, Dianne – (D – CA) (202) 224-3841 Contact: www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cf…
Harris, Kamala D. – (D – CA) (202) 224-3553 Contact: www.harris.senate.gov/content/contact-se…
from Raymond Hills ·
When it rains, we are at 200% of average snow pack. Hire back those gardeners. Green, weedless lawns all around!!! : )
Edited 16h ago
from Raymond Hills ·
Sorry for the off topic Joe, but you mentioned rain and pour. : )
Edited 15h ago
from Raymond Hills ·
Relative to your post, please see min 4:55 for further explanation of 5G and placement of DAS, wireless antennas in our neighborhoods, and impacts to our health. This legislation will “streamline” the process for cell tower siting, gut the 1996 TAC in order to do so.
from Raymond Hills ·
223 scientists from 39 countries all disagree with Roman Schulze, Mark Shapiro and even Erik Wehn who calls himself a scientist who all say this is all safe. You can sue Schulze, Shapiro and Wehn if you get sick from this stuff because they have held themselves out as experts claiming this is all safe. It is not folks. To make matters worse, our city council, all of five of them, have ignored this for four years along with Sharon Quirk Silva and Young Kim in the Assembly and now it is coming down to the wire.It is bad enough what is going on in the schools that is being ignored. 223 scientists from 39 countries are all wrong? Microwaves are a weapon and it is time to grow up and face reality. We are all under attack..
from Raymond Hills ·
Greg Sebourn, Bruce Whitaker, Jennifer Fitzgerald, Jan Flory, Doug Chaffee and even Jesus Silva have spent years ignoring this issue. They have chosen to ignore their duty and responsibility to protect the residents of Fullerton. Now the local control is about to be removed from the very ones that REFUSED to excercise it when they had the chance. Young Kim even voted for AB 57 ignoring tens of thousands of pages of research and testimony that was presented at the hearings by my colleagues. Her approval of AB 57 has this all coming to fruition that much closer to reality.
By the way, this is not a political discussion. This is a discussion about health and safety as it relates to our community.
from Downtown Fullerton ·
Oh fun, this again. Since there’s no point in arguing with someone so incapable of rational thought, I’ll just leave this here:
You’re wrong, this is a waste of time, and you’re wrong. Anyone thinking there’s something worth pursuing here, you’re wrong, too. Have a good day!
from Raymond Hills ·
Matt Karaffa versus 229 scientists from 29 countries and Matt Karaffa works for a company that makes wireless devices
from Rolling Hills ·
You are coming out for regulations and against big industry. The party you support isn’t supporting you, but they are thankful for your vote.
from Raymond Hills ·
Jim I am coming out for citizen input to stop the roll out of microwave systems on all the light poles and power poles, on schools, and government buildings. Both sides of the political aisle have sold us down the river. This is not a partisan or political issue. This is an issue of public health.
from Raymond Hills ·
I hear they’re making suits in tinfoil now. Perhaps that is a self-help avenue to explore?
from Raymond Hills ·
They better make 229 of them, one for each scientist that has come out against this and get ready to ship them to 39 countries real fast. John, have you considered the health of the hundreds of CKE employees that are FORCED to wear wireless headsets all day that are the equivalent of a cell phone being in use all day glued to their head? Are you responsible for that in some way with your role at CKE? How about the wireless transmitters in proximity to their abdomen that the employees at CKE are forced to wear all day?
I find it disturbing that those that make their living off of proliferating these dangerous devices are the ones who step right up and attack the messenger. It must be some sort of catharsis or something.
from Downtown Fullerton ·
Hmm, maybe we should notify the rest of the scientists (Thousands – 229) that they’re all wrong. We’ll tell them our local crackpot with an insane website filled with absurd conspiracy theories said so.
Also, no, I don’t work for a company that makes wireless devices, so your insinuation that I’m some sort of corporate shill is hilarious, and kind of creepy, to be honest. What are you doing, stalking me on the internet? As far as I know, we’ve never met, and I’ve never discussed my employment status with you.
from Raymond Hills ·
Matt Karaffa,
Why is it that every time information about the bio hazards of wireless radiation are posted to NextDoor, you appear on the post refuting it? You refute not only the hundreds of EMF scientists but decades of science?
I find that odd and “kind of creepy.” Because of that pattern, you appear desperate to silence this message.
The fact is that people are getting sick from these exposures, I know some of them and, as wireless devices proliferate, this population of sick is increasing.
Why don’t you contact the scientists and begin to understand what they do?
from Raymond Hills ·
Matt, please feel free to contact the scientists yourself. Have a conversation with them and maybe you will learn something that your employer forbids you to discuss. Matt you work for a company called Marvell Technologies who makes wireless devices, and your comments on The Fullerton Informer show up under their IP address when you post them. You are a staunch supporter of wireless technology based on your comments on my site and this forum.
from Downtown Fullerton ·
“Matt you work for a company called Marvell Technologies who makes wireless devices”
Oh, really? You’re doing a poor job stalking me. Work harder, creep.
from Rolling Hills ·
We can measure the energy present in various wavelengths of radiation, and accurately predict their effects on tissue. We can predict exactly at what millisecond a molecule of water will evaporate based on the change in temperature from any particular energy source.
It is that science that is refuting your ‘information’
from Rolling Hills ·
Cranks can make great money pushing their theories. No one is willing to pay actual scientists to fight this misinformation; it’s up to a few volunteers to defend science on their own time/dime.
from Raymond Hills ·
Matt, Google reveals http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Matthew-Karaff…
I do not know why you pop up like a jack in the box calling me all kinds of names as soon as I hit your proverbial nerve with the word wireless. You have doubled down multiple times insisting wireless is safe. You are at odds with decades of research and thousands of scientific studies. The 5G rollout will utilize even higher frequencies which have NEVER BEEN TESTED for their affects on human health. How can you call me insane when forcibly exposing entire populations when this being the case actually defines insanity? It is actually criminal.There are people in this community that are very threatened by this information because they are employed in fields that are directly connected to it. That is not a valid justification to harm everyone else in the process by trying to detract from message here. We need to be protected from the industry that is proceeding full speed ahead. It is already fully deployed in the schools despite the years we have sounded the alarm and the same people that defended that show up here to defend this. I don’t have an explanation for that behavior.
from Raymond Hills ·
Really? How would they be making money? There is no fortune to be made by these scientists in telling the truth. In fact, the price for them is high.
CTIA owns the conversation. Maybe you should ask to get compensated, wireless is the largest market in the world. They have plenty of resources, shills to pay someone like you, a ‘volunteer.’
Meanwhile, people continue to be harmed.
from Downtown Fullerton ·
That’s funny, that’s far from up-to-date. The fact that your first avenue of attacking me is assuming I have some financial stake in this is hilarious, though, and telling as to your way of thinking.
You just keep thinking that you’re not gullible for believing stupid conspiracy theories, and that the rest of the world is too dumb or evil to get behind you, and only you, the guy that thinks the earth is flat, is the only one who can save us from all the scary scientists that are part of a global conspiracy to do something… that you haven’t specified… that will make The Illuminati control the world… because that’s totally a real thing… You’re not crazy at all!
from Rolling Hills ·
But there are many different forms of wireless radiation, and a lot of the literature you quote just uses that blanket term. Even humans give off wireless radiation! The real question is about what wavelength and at what distance, and that’s where some of the literature you point us to deliberately puts everything all in one box.
I agree that modern science doesn’t know everything, and that there should be higher standards of testing in general before testing on humans starts, especially children! I just think this is a pretty well examined area, and using the word wireless to describe both WIFI routers, industrial power transformers, microwaves, and laser beams misleads more than it reveals.
from Raymond Hills ·
Jim, here is an industry crank turned crank in your vernacular https://thefullertoninformer.com/dr-georg…
from Rolling Hills ·
Joe, that guy has lied about so many things it’s hard to take him seriously. I’d say he’s permanently tarnished:http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Geo…
He has been pro agent orange, pro chlorine, pro tobacco, pro cell phone, and it seems like this might be blackmail/revenge when he couldn’t get any more money.
Your heart is in the right place, Joe, even though I disagree with you.
from Raymond Hills ·
He has played both sides of the fence but that is exactly why both sides need to be looked at. Here is another article and Hardell’s work is cited. He is a lot cleaner. https://thefullertoninformer.com/experts-…
#1 by Anonymous on February 7, 2017 - 9:00 pm
“Nextdoor is really all about a bunch of paranoid ninnies whining about a bunch of bullshit.”
Sounds a lot like this site!