THE MOST DANGEROUS DOCTOR IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-RICHARD PAN-Complaint Information:click the link below to file against physician license number 84883
The Medical Board is responsible for reviewing and investigating complaints about, and disciplining licensed physicians. We must flood the medical board with requests and make our voices heard. We believe Dr. Pan is the most dangerous doctor in the country and must be stopped. Forced unlimited vaccinations is the most dangerous and tyrannical proposed edict in our Nation’s history.
Complaint Against Senator Richard Pan
California Senate Health Committee Hearing and Vote on SB277, Public Health: vaccinations
Date: 4/8/2015
Testimony given by California State Senator, Dr. Richard Pan, on April 8, 2015, directly contradict established facts in the following source documents:
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
- CA SB277, Public health: vaccinations
In context, Dr. Pan, as author of SB277, is using his medical license to create, influence passage, and enact public health legislation based on testimony in direct conflict with readily-available and established fact.
The following is excerpted testimony given by Sen. Richard Pan as statements and in answer to fellow Health Committee member’s questions. The video of this testimony is provided here:http://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=7&clip_id=2716&hc_location=ufi
Senator Pan testimony:
- 00:21:50 Vaccines are safe and efficacious.
- 00:23:45 Evidence shows that the disease that has been prevented by vaccination is at least a thousand times more likely to cause a lasting problem than the vaccine itself and there have been no confirmed deaths caused by the measles vaccine.
Statements 1 and 2 are invalid, as evidenced in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to compensate vaccine-related injury or death. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database, as of December 14, 2014 articulates 6,962 serious adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with measles vaccine since 1990, with over half of those occurring in children three years old and under. Of these events329 were deaths, with over half of the deaths occurring in children under three years of age. To date, more than $2.8 billion has been awarded to victims and victim’s family for overall vaccine injury and death.
http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/index.html
- 0026:00 Let me be clear, SB277 does not mandate vaccinations, but the choice, that choice, requires responsibility and we have the responsibility to protect all children attending school by requiring vaccinations when children go attend school with other children.
- 3:02:00 As I said before, this bill is not about mandatory vaccinations; we don’t want to get to the place where we are going to be mandatorily vaccinating children against their parents’ will.
- 03:37:30 Informed consent is still necessary to get your child vaccinated. (in reference to the amended bill)
Statements #3 – 5 are incorrect. Reference SB277 Public health: vaccinations, which calls for mandatory vaccination for all school children, where parents will not be able to get a medical exemption for their children and will not be able to home school and will face the possible permanent removal of their children from their homes, fines and imprisonment. The bill does, in fact, get rid of “personal believe exemption” the only non-medical exemption. Per SB277 language, “This bill would eliminate the exemption from immunization based upon personal beliefs.” Furthermore, “informed consent” is not an exemption and, therefore, cannot be asserted as ‘still necessary to get your child vaccinated.’
Source document: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB277
This bill is about taking away your God given rights to protect our children’s bodies from the tyrannical edicts of medical tyranny and what amounts to forced medical procedures and forced poisoning of our children’s bloodstreams. No religious or personal belief exemption in the bill means an impossible to obtain medical exemption door is closed resulting in forced vaccinations at gunpoint for those who cannot afford to home school.
Dr. Pan acting as a physician in his professional capacity in order to unduly directly influence the legislative process with what appear to bald faced lies is, in our opinion amounts to valid grounds for revocation of his medical license. In addition, we believe his actions are in clear, absolute and direct violation of the American Medical Association’s code of ethics. Dr. Pan knows the following American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Ethics opinions completely contradict FORCED vaccination:
Apparently, Richard Pan has no regard for Freedom of Religion, informed consent that the American Medical Association upholds in its Code of Ethics. Does he support a totalitarian government that will force parents to vaccinate their children whether they are publicly, privately, or homeschooled or face criminal charges? Therefore it is time for all parents to call for the:
Revocation and/or Suspension of Dr. Pan’s Physician License.
The state licensing board has wide discretion in the matter of revocation of licenses and may revoke a license without any terms or conditions, leaving no possibility for reinstatement.
The general defenses against a revocation of license include denial of due process, violation of equal protection clause, compelling self-incrimination, etc. However, courts have held in a number of cases that the “state had a legitimate interest in protecting its citizens from incompetent physicians, and requiring doctors suspected of being incompetent to attend an investigatory hearing or submit to reexamination was rationally related to that interest, so neither a statute nor a board’s treatment of a physician violated the equal protection clause[iii].” However, such revocation shall be done only after affording sufficient notice and hearing and courts have held that a substantially ex parte proceeding of revocation violates due process.
A statute empowering the state licensing board to revoke licenses shall not be vague and ambiguous. Courts have held that certain acts or conduct that are described in broad general terms are not prima facie objectionable if the general words are accompanied by more specific ones that may be properly construed to limit and make certain the general ones. The legislative purpose of the statute is protecting the public against the unauthorized practice of medicine and courts have held that the Board must be accorded authority to define the grounds for medical discipline on a case-by-case basis[iv].
The Board’s power to revoke licenses includes the power to suspend an erring medical practitioner from practice. Upon a finding of unprofessional conduct warranting revocation, the Board has discretion suspend the practitioner from practice for the period permitted by the statute. The board can also impose conditions during the suspension period and may require a showing of professional competence before reinstating a license[v].
Professional incompetence, bad character, immorality, professional misconduct, dishonorable conduct, conviction of criminal offense, and gross negligence form valid grounds for revocation of license. The valid grounds for revocation of license may often be enlisted in the statute. Acting in excess of one’s professional authority, like for instance, engaging in the general practice of medicine or surgery, or professing to do so, in excess of a license limited to the practice of special branch of medicine warrants the revocation of the limited license.
The board has power to initiate disciplinary action against a physician even in the absence of any complaints from the patients. The board may take action even in the case of a single act of violation and in the absence of proof of injury.
Courts have held that the revocation of a license is proper if the physician has been found guilty of drug abuse or was suffering from mental disability.
The procedure for revocation may be established by statute and state legislatures generally delegate to an administrative tribunal the power of revocation or suspension, together with the power to hear and determine charges. “A trial and conviction in a court of competent jurisdiction is not a condition precedent to a proceeding by the state board of health against a physician to revoke his license for any of the causes provided by statute[viii].”
Generally, statutes of limitation are not applicable to disciplinary proceedings and courts have held that due process does not require the application of a statute of limitations to such proceedings. However, due process requires the application of the doctrine of laches, albeit narrowly to license revocation proceedings[ix]. Courts have held that this has to be done without jeopardizing the public interest.
Moreover, the evidence must unequivocally indicate that the conduct of the licensee did not conform to the conduct of a member of the same profession exercising reasonable care and skill, supplemented by testimony to the effect that other professionals would have utilized a different procedure is insufficient to establish negligence or incompetence[xi].
The burden of proof is on the applicant seeking restoration of a medical license. The applicant must adduce sufficient evidence so ineluctable in its implications that it would compel restoration of license by the Board. There is conflict of opinion regarding the burden of proof. One view is that issues of fact in a revocation or suspension proceeding do not have to be shown beyond a reasonable doubt, but only by a preponderance of the evidence. On the other hand, some courts have held that the board is required to use clear and convincing evidence due to the plenary nature of the proceedings[xii].
Courts will review the conclusions of law de novo. While reviewing the sanctions imposed by the licensing board, the court defers to the board’s expertise and will not generally substitute its discretion for that of the board. The physician can seek mandamus as an available and appropriate remedy for wrongful revocation if no other method of review has been provided by the statute. However, mandamus is not the proper remedy if the statute provides another adequate remedy, such as appeal.
[i] Younge v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346 (Mo. 1969).
[ii] Faulkenstein v. District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 727 A.2d 302 (D.C. 1999).
[iii] Artman v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 918 S.W.2d 247 (Mo. 1996).
[iv] State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. McCroskey, 880 P.2d 1188 (Colo. 1994).
[v] Board of Dental Examiners v. Hufford, 461 N.W.2d 194 (Iowa 1990).
[vi] Ricks v. Mississippi State Dept. of Health, 719 So. 2d 173 (Miss. 1998).
[vii] Paulson v. Board of Medical Examiners of State of Iowa, 592 N.W.2d 677 (Iowa 1999).
[viii] Bandeen v. Howard, 299 S.W.2d 249 (Ky. 1956)
[ix] Sinha v. Ambach, 91 A.D.2d 703, 457 N.Y.S.2d 603 (3d Dep’t 1982).
[x] Artman v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 918 S.W.2d 247 (Mo. 1996).
[xi] Sizemore v. Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 747 S.W.2d 389 (Tex. App. Dallas 1987).
[xii] Painter v. Abels, 998 P.2d 931 (Wyo. 2000).
#1 by CA Gov + Pope on Depopulation on June 17, 2015 - 7:13 am
Monday, June 15, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: Vatican, climate science, world depopulation
Vatican speaker and California Governor in push for massive depopulation… talk of ‘Planetary Court’ and removal of 6 billion people under new ‘Earth Constitution’ and ‘World Government’
(NaturalNews) The depopulationists are on the move again, pushing hard for the elimination of six billion people on planet Earth in order to bring the planet down to what’s being touted as its “sustainable carrying capacity of one billion people.”
But this time, the depopulation agenda may be codified by the Vatican. Professor John Schellnhuber has been chosen as a speaker for the Vatican’s rolling out of a Papal document on climate change. He’s the professor who previously said the planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people. Now, the Vatican is giving him a platform which many expect will result in an official Church declaration in support of radical depopulation in the name of “climate science.”
“The teaching document, called an encyclical, is scheduled for release on June 18 at Vatican City,” reports Breitbart.com. “Perhaps with the exception of the 1968 encyclical on contraception, no Vatican document has been greeted with such anticipation.”
A new Planetary Court to hold power over all nations… one ring to rule them all
Schellnhuber daydreams about a “Planetary Court” guided by a new “Earth Constitution” which would hold power over every nation and government on the planet. As he explains himself in this document on HumansAndNature.org, he’s a proponent of an all-powerful, climate-focused world government that would rule over the planet… a literal “science dictatorship” based on whatever “science” the climate change proponents can fudge together each year.
As Schellnhuber says:
Let me conclude this short contribution with a daydream about those key institutions that could bring about a sophisticated — and therefore more appropriate — version of the conventional “world government” notion. Global democracy might be organized around three core activities, namely (i) an Earth Constitution; (ii) a Global Council; and (iii) a Planetary Court. I cannot discuss these institutions in any detail here, but I would like to indicate at least that:
– the Earth Constitution would transcend the UN Charter and identify those first principles guiding humanity in its quest for freedom, dignity, security and sustainability;
– the Global Council would be an assembly of individuals elected directly by all people on Earth, where eligibility should be not constrained by geographical, religious, or cultural quotas; and
– the Planetary Court would be a transnational legal body open to appeals from everybody, especially with respect to violations of the Earth Constitution.
Schellnhunber, in other words, believes a new world government can create “freedom” for humanity by dictating to it with a new Planetary Court guided by an Earth Constitution which will no doubt begin by declaring the planet can only sustain one billion people. The other six billion or so simply have to go. So instead of a Bill of Rights, this new Earth Constitution will be founded on a Bill of Deaths and a global government that might order the extermination of billions of human beings in order to “save the climate.”
“In an unprecedented encyclical on the subject of the environment, the pontiff is expected to argue that humanity’s exploitation of the planet’s resources has crossed the Earth’s natural boundaries,” reports The Guardian. “…[T]he world faces ruin without a revolution in hearts and minds.”
The Guardian goes on to report:
The pope is “aiming at a change of heart. What will save us is not technology or science. What will save us is the ethical transformation of our society,” said Carmelite Father Eduardo Agosta Scarel, a climate scientist who teaches at the Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina in Buenos Aires.
California Governor worried that too many people exist
Interestingly, California Governor Jerry Brown might welcome such a depopulation agenda organized under a new world government. He recently tweeted about California having too many people, saying, “At some point, how many people can we accommodate?” Gov. Brown goes on to say that climate change is the reason the current drought is so much more worse than anything they’ve seen in the past.
Apparently, California has too many people, Gov. Brown says, and that means California needs to be deliberately depopulated.
With this, the Vatican and Jerry Brown join the efforts of other depopulation advocates like Bill Gates, who once said that vaccines can help reduce the world population by 10 to 15 percent.
True to that claim, vaccines given to young women have now been discovered to be intentionally laced with sterilization chemicals, according to the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization funded in part by UNICEF.
Similarly, a shocking 75% of children given vaccines in a small town in Mexico ended up hospitalized or dead after a recent round of vaccine shots that many have speculated might be part of a depopulation test run.
Fast depopulation vs slow depopulation
Since YOU are one of the targets of global depopulation, you may want to increase your awareness of how it might be accomplished. When it comes to depopulation, there are two approaches considered by the globalists:
SLOW DEPOPULATION: This method focuses on covert sterilization via vaccines, free birth control pills, and “social services” education efforts that try to convince women to have fewer children. The idea is to slowly let the current population of 7 billion die off while the birth rate plummets, causing the total population to shrink over time. You might call this the “non-violent” way to gradually reduce the population over time. Nobody has to prematurely die for this to be pulled off, in other words.
FAST DEPOPULATION: This method involves fast-kill strategies to essentially murder billions of people while blaming it on something else. The most likely candidates include the release of an aerosolized bioweapon (Ebola 2.0?), the insertion of aggressive cancer viruses in vaccines (see the confession of former Merck vaccine scientist Maurice Hilleman for background), global nuclear war, the intentional release of EMP weapons that destroy the power grid, and so on. These are obviously the more nefarious, dastardly depopulation pursuits, and they would obviously consist of global murder on a massive scale.
“Slow depopulation” methods have been tried since the 1970’s. They haven’t worked. As world population continues to rise, the global power brokers now seem to be experimenting with “fast depopulation” approaches to achieve their goal of eliminating six billion people from the planet.
Deliberate depopulation vs. unintentional depopulation
Another dimension in this discussion emerges in the distinction between “deliberate” and “unintentional” depopulation.
Deliberate depopulation is, of course, the pursuit of actions and policies which are intended to directly and quantifiably reduce the number of humans living on the planet.
Unintentional depopulation is what happens when catastrophe strikes and the systems keeping modern civilization humming along suddenly collapse: a power grid failure, for example, or a runaway genetic pollution of crops that leads to global starvation. The climate change scientists insist that the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere will somehow cause the catastrophic collapse of society, leading to the deaths of millions or billions of people.
Accordingly, the globalists see themselves as being compassionate for humanity by invoking deliberate depopulation, thereby preventing catastrophic, unintentional depopulation (i.e. a global die-off following the catastrophic collapse of the global ecosystem). That’s how they justify covert vaccine sterilization programs, for example, or talk of eliminating six billion people on the planet. In other words, when they are murdering you and six billion of your brothers and sisters, just remember that in their own minds, they LOVE life and are protecting the ecosystem!
But how, exactly, do you go about eliminating six billion people if you’re a globalist pushing for mass murder in the name of climate science?
How do they kill six billion people? Twelve monkeys!
Killing one person is called murder. Killing six billion people is called “climate science.” But how do you pull it off, exactly?
It’s easier than you might think. As depicted in the movie Twelve Monkeys, all it takes is the release of a weaponized, genetically engineered virus in any major airport, anywhere in the world. (I’m not saying this is true because it was in a movie. That would be absurd. Rather, in this case, the movie correctly depicts the reality of how easily a bioweapon could be spread by someone with the intent to destroy human civilization as we know it.)
From there, the virus replicates and spreads globally, causing widespread death and depopulation while simultaneously empowering world governments to control their populations with medical police state powers such as forced quarantines, restrictions on travel, forced immunizations, medical checkpoints on highways and so on. (It’s sort of the perfect police state model if you think about it, and it gives governments the justification to insert medical tracking RFID chips into everybody’s bodies at gunpoint. C’mon you control freaks, you know how excited you get when you think about microchipping the population! It’s FUN!)
The U.S. military already possesses biological weapons which could kill one billion or more
It’s an undebatable fact that the U.S. military has long engineered and tested such viral bioweapons to potentially use as weapons of war. (I previously wrote about the airborne Ebola that ran wild through a U.S. Army medical research facility in 1990, killing an entire building full of monkeys before they “nuked” the building with sterilization chemicals.)
While international treaties claim such research has been abandoned, only a fool believes such hollow promises are ever kept. In reality, the research is merely shifted into covert status, continuing as normal on “black budgets.” Today, the United States government possesses viral strains which could decimate humanity in less than a year’s time… and they could be “accidentally-purposely” released anywhere on the planet without notice.
Of course, if you were going to release a deadly virus to decimate humanity (the word “decimate” means to kill 1 in every 10, by the way, it does not mean to “eradicate”), you would first make sure all your elite globalist buddies received vaccine shots against the virus. Naturally, those vaccine shots would be manufactured without any of the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and MSG found in vaccines given to the general public, thereby making them significantly safer. The CDC, of course, would stay completely silent on this pandemic, just as they’ve maintained absolute silence on the confession of their scientist Dr. William Thompson, who publicly admitted to taking part in scientific fraud at the CDC to hide the links between vaccines and autism in African-Americans.
The public would be left to fend for itself. And in this scenario, guess who would be most likely to survive? People who use medicinal herbs and immune-boosting superfoods. Those who are wiped out by the weaponized population control virus would largely consist of the elderly, the immunosuppressed, and the malnourished.
That might be precisely who the new “Planetary Court” world government wants to eliminate in the first place, sparing the able-bodies workers who pay confiscatory taxes to governments and produce economic output that can be exploited by the globalist corporations.
So I now throw the question back to the Pope, Professor John Schellnhuber, Bill Gates, Ted Turner and other depopulation fanatics: How exactly are you planning to eliminate six billion people from this planet?
The truly hilarious part in all this is that the world’s masses are already so totally brainwashed by climate propaganda that if you ordered them to voluntarily report to “eco-friendly euthanasia chambers” to save the planet by killing themselves, they’d line up in droves to comply! Heck, they’d buy tickets!
Interestingly, that might not be such a bad idea just to invoke the global Darwin award and invite the world’s most idiotic, obedient sheeple to voluntarily remove themselves from the human gene pool in a sort of modern-day mass sacrifice to Gaia. The Aztecs did it, and that worked out just great! (Just ask all the Aztecs that are still around.) What could possibly go wrong?
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/050075_Vatican_climate_science_world_depopulation.html#ixzz3dKQVDC6b