Endangering the Herd


“There are 24 different measles genotypes or strains. The CDC finally did molecular characterization to determine the genotype implicated in the Disney outbreak, labeled “B3.”
MMR only targets “A.”
MMR is utterly USELESS and does absolutely NOTHING for the 23 other strains. 
This REFUTES the following:
1. Unvaccinated children are spreading measles
2. Everyone needs to be vaccinated
3. The measles vaccine protects against measles
We need a vaccine against stupidity.”



This story came to me from one of my trusted advisors late last night and this post from last year deserves another run. This whole Disney set up with this government run manufactured measles outbreak is a pretext to forcibly inject everyone with whatever the HELL THE GOVERNMENT DEEMS NECESSARY, including sterilants and hormones to attack brain development. Look at the kids folks-they are already falling apart. NEXT TO WIRELESS, THIS THING IS THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY.

But hey, you will believe anyone in a white coat with some initials embossed on the smuck’s smock and any bimbo with a microphone engraved with an illuminati mind control network media logo right. Not everyone has been lobotomized by the Monday night foolsball commercials, the cartoons and the Nordstrom fragrance section.

THIS  The case for suing parents who don’t vaccinate their kids—or criminally charging them.  Never you mind that the vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued if their product kills or injures your child.  Oh yes, the Feds have a program to take care of you alright, but with Big Pharma stacking the deck with all of their bought and paid for scientists and their black robe buddies we get the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Yes, it is a one way street with speed bumps for the parents and a five lane highway for Big Pharma. You guessed it. Only those that have spent at least a decade or longer under the influence of Big Pharma’s priesthood can tell us what is true and what is not.  No one dares to listen to anyone else.  If you are not a scientist or unless you are sporting a few funny letters after your last name, you are a crackpot like me.  They will just ignore you. Well, the push back has begun and the bioethicists,  the eugenicists and the drug pushers are getting scared.  You know they are worried when they take it to the airwaves and jam it down our throats on the Twonky.

Boy, do we have a tale of two cities set right before our very eyes with truly amazing times indeed on the idiot box with anti vaccine Jenny McCarthy set to hit The View on 9-9 as a sort of keep your eye off the wireless/autism connection http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/  red herring.  On the other side of the aisle, we have the Law and Order hit piece, and good old Barry Boy picking  up the rear on the saw dust trail with the push to vaccinate everyone with his free for all health plan.  It really ties in rather nicely to what we are dealing with in terms of implied consent, informed consent and the potential dangers of  the wireless radiation exposure to our children in the classrooms and the real enforcement arm of the convergence of these agendas: The Public School System and its soon to be two dimensional list verifying learning system.

So this begs the question. Who is really endangering who? What is really being endangered? Is it public health, our children’s reproductive capabilities, critical thinking, or more?  With eyes wide shut, with their color of law mandates, and their rank and file robots, what is really endangering the “herd”?  I will attempt to address it below. Let us begin with the following questions:

35 shots by age 6?

So if these injections really work then what’s with the push?

What on earth is really in those things?

Aren’t these diseases rarely fatal in healthy properly nourished human beings including children?


There is the catch phrase: healthy human beings. By design that euphemism to describe us and our children has become something of an urban legend. Think I am kidding? Look around, I mean really don’t kid yourself and look around.

You know when pathogens forcibly enter the body by-passing the natural defenses such as the multiple layers of epidermis,  salivary and friendly bacterial attack in the mouth, lodging in the nostrils and being sneezed out, being coughed out or vomitted out, instead heading straight for the bloodstream by being injected deep and directly into our bloodstream through a syringe with an adjuvant hitch hiking along with nano tech compounds and modified trans species genetic materials, toxic chemicals and preservatives that even according to Darwin himself would never find their way inside us, it ends up kind of like a Steely Dan song or a even a bad concert with the exits blocked.  Sanitation, running water, nutrition, heating, improved air quality and access to nutritious foods all have nothing to do with ending diseases, only the vaccines have saved humanity.

Here we go, take a deep breath- it’s a run on.

Before I can even begin to answer that and before I can even consider rolling up my children’s sleeves to the white coats, and before the black robes even get involved, I just realized that you need to know that they really keep us all in the dark by design, literally telling us to stay out of the evil dangerous sun, slathering toxic sunscreen all over the largest organ in our bodies that absorbs 90% of what we put on it-the skin, with UV blocking contact lenses and sunglasses blocking the most efficient Vitamin D manufacturing process in the universe, while they feed the youngest of the  herd (your newborn children) coffee creamer, talcum powder synthetic vitamin beverages that they call infant formula in place of mother’s milk, for the adult members of the herd (you and I) carbonated bone and tooth dissolving aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose laced beverages along side the trichinosis laden, drugged, GMO corn-fed swine sausages for breakfast, GMO corn-fed, antibiotic laden, hemorrhagic e-coli hamburgers for lunch with the dimethyl polysiloxane soaked fries, franken-fruits and vegetables fertilized with sewage sludge,toxic liquids whose farm tanks on standby have skull and crossbones on them, nerve agent pesticides misted from the air with the atrazene dusters, dumped into the soil with soakers, all the while they have us growing inedible plants spraying roundup all over our now rendered toxically useless yards, mercury laden high fructose corn syrup for dessert, SRI’s for the misdiagnosed hypoglycemics, pig insulin for those that have abandoned the consumption of a broad spectrum of sugars for the high fructose diet option, 5-FU for the nitriloside deficient dependents, synthetic vitamins to keep the imbalance going from the industrial waste, trace pharmaceutical laden municipal water supply laced with a myriad of toxic halide compounds they pawn off on us as disinfectants, trans fat delectables from the drive-thru for dinner, HCL blockers that send undigested food south on us,  highly addictive opiate liver eating pain killers for our pleasure, a steady diet of PDE5 inhibitors coupled with satanic, violent pornographic movies and cartoons with accelerant and pesticide laden wines, bone dissolving belly busting beer, age accelerating ales, and dark, wild, witches brewed hard liquor exotic spirits for the nightcap, petrochemical pharmaceutical grade sleep aids for the WiFi, wireless microwave nightstand cordless phone base station, router emitting to the laptop or tablet between the legs wireless radiation exposure induced sleep depriving out of whack melatonin levels and they want to make sure they don’t miss a beat with the bioethicists eugenics fantasy hots for our blood stream by freaking out everyone by going after their wallet and pumping our kids full of who knows what all in the name of public health? Whew!  Deep breath-there, I said it.

Well why not? Apparently we already are pumping our kids and ourselves full of who knows what but there is one difference folks. This is all by your choice. It is a free country, or is it?

Well I guess in light of how the masters believe that the herd cannot maintain its health on its own given the poor choices that it is directed to make by Madison Avenue, Big Brother’s inverted food pyramid, at the behest of the trusted medical establishment hacks, irrespective of the massive leaps forward in sanitation and the miraculous logistics of food distribution with healthy food choices literally staring us in the face wrapping themselves around the entire perimeter of these glorified liquor stores called supermarkets whose center aisles contain all the poisons, it is no wonder that we must take the injections.


They say that we must inject and comply. I say that we dare not and refuse to ignore this miraculous creation by Almighty God, the human body. It is the most complete, efficient, incredible machine in the universe sporting  its 75,000 miles of circulatory system, its own thermostat, water and fuel pump, defense department, and super computer between the ears that on any given day, only uses about 3% of its capacity. I say we listen to it, take care of it, trust it, trust The One who put it together, follow His instruction manual and tap the other 97% of the available hard drive when needed. I never put soybean oil in my car’s gas tank. Why do we allow the control freaks in public health, medicine,  academia, and the media to convince us to do the equivalent to our bodies with all of the aforementioned?

Allopathic medicine has its place folks. Don’t get me wrong. It just doesn’t have its place EVERYWHERE, it should not have a monopoly on the system of care and it should not be preeminent. These folks in the embossed white coats that think they know it all couldn’t create a blade of grass in a lab from scratch if their lives depended on it. They don’t have all of the answers and most of the ones that they do have are wrong anyway.

Can we please step back and start with at least a water filter, open the windows, ride a bike, and plant some fruit trees or a garden? Why can’t we have good clean water, fresh air, good clean real food,sunlight, a clean bloodstream, and an uncompromised immune system?

Well of course we can, but it is your choice, but not according to the experts. We are a HERD, mind you-their herd or so they delusionally think. Herds cannot think for themselves and cannot take care of themselves. Herds must be fed, subdued, curtailed, corralled, controlled eventually always culled. So the masters feed us their toxic fake food, subdue us with their 24/7 fear mongering, kinky 300 channel idiot box circus, curtail us by endowing extreme powers to criminalize the most menial aberrations in human behavior, empower the myopic control freaks with an educational caste system,  control us with petrochemical poisons in the food water and mentally disorienting microwave emissions in the air, and culled, yes culled by in my opinion, what can only be described as the largest forced irradiation of school children that the world has ever known and the potential effects on fertility coupled with the inoculation programs that work lockstep in leaving no stone un-turned.

http://www.cdph.ca.gov/pubsforms/forms/ctrldforms/pm286b.pd  Is this form included  in the enrollment packets?

no_shots copy


How about their forced irradiation of the Fullerton School District’s children all the way down to the 5 year olds that just spilled over into  the infant care centers, preschools, and before and after school day care facilities as a direct result of Pletka’s wireless classroom edicts that are being slickly packaged and peddled to the unsuspecting parents?  Yes there is.  I just don’t know if it is the frozen middle layer or the microwaved icing on this hellish cake but I do know that this is what they plan to jam down our throats and call progress and a necessity. I don’t care if this wireless stuff is being put in everywhere. If everyone started jumping off of the Brooklyn Bridge, does that mean we all should too? This whole thing is garnished and served up on a platter with two aspirin to all of the unsuspecting masses who daily suffer from a TV, technology, sports, sugar, shopping, alcohol or the I am so smart, bitchin, and full of myself academia condesenscion hangover. Look folks, this crap won’t go down easy if you are awake, on your game and on your toes.  We aim to help you get back into and back on yours if you can remember where you left off and where they are.

As far as answering those two questions from the start of the article:

35 shots by age 6? Why the push?  What on earth is really in those things? Why are they jamming all of this wireless technology down our throats?  What if this push to inject and irradiate us and our children was really part of a clandestine program to adversely impact ours and our children’s cognitive function, physical health and fertility? By the looks of what they are doing to everyone right now with the food, water, media and medicine, nothing really surprises me anymore. They just print the money, give us cheap toxic imitation food, endless mindless entertainment, our kids hellish cartoons, demonic blood thirst highly addictive digital crack video games,  debaucherous role models with half naked women everywhere, put everyone on pills, dope and booze all in order to physically and emotionally wear us down, morally compromise us, and make everyone act like animals so someday, THEY CAN TREAT US LIKE ANIMALS.  I believe that there is a tiny, powerful segment of the population whose worldview is diametrically opposed to that of the unsuspecting simple people like you and I that just want to be left alone and raise our families. Yeah yeah call me a conspiracy theorist and I will call those that forcibly inject, drug and irradiate our children eugenicists.

I beleive that they operate in stealth fashion under the premise that most people believe that such a plan is just a conspiracy theory. Sounds like the perfect crime to me. So in the meantime,  I can only wildly speculate and nothing remotely positive comes to mind. We are not in the dark ages, with raw sewage in the streets and rats and disease running rampant. We are not faced with the plagues, just public health color of law mandates connected to syringes. Why? Simply look around for what is running rampant, that is the obvious unprecedented decline in public health, most alarmingly, our children’s.  It is certainly headed that way as the same people on the boards of these food companies that are screwing everyone up are also sitting on boards of the tobacco and drug companies finishing off the job. Remember the third leading cause of death in this country is MD directed treatment. The first two leading causes are all indirectly caused by the affiliates of the third.  Ah yes from the cradle to the grave, the injection love fest begins in the warmer and ends with embalmer’s.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are on the verge of forced vaccination and forced irradiation. What you are witnessing is full circle command and control, all exits covered, body, soul, mind and spirit or so the masters think. Not so fast. We still have and I still love that two letter word that still works wonders, moves mountains and can sometimes spare us from enduring the most unconscionable circumstances-The Word-NO.  Mixed with common sense we must implore for Almighty God to help us to use it wisely and courageously as needed especially when it comes to our children. Look yours in the eyes tonight and remember to trust no one and question everything. These are perilous times ladies and gentlemen.


  1. #1 by WC on August 17, 2013 - 3:13 pm

    This is a terrible stance. I love that he uses the term “herd” to describe society. That is exactly how the elite/globalist look at us. I will not let someone who has no support for the safety or the dangers of vaccine dictate what goes directly into my body or my family’s bodies from monkey viruses to worse.

    For his argument to be semi credible the Vaccine manufacturers need to be held liable for any damages they cause. Currently they are not able to be sued as such for damages caused by their product. Why should they operate with complete impunity?

    When I hear the word herd, culling of the herd comes to mind.

    Trust no one, question everything – William Cooper

    Nano Tech in the vaccines, autism and RF exposure? http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/

    • #2 by Anonymous on August 19, 2013 - 11:01 pm

      Great points. Definitely not a level playing field. Are you referring to the SV-40 virus that contaminated the polio shots years ago? Most of those recipients are now in their 60’s now.

    • #3 by freudian tools on August 28, 2013 - 8:17 am

      You are all being conned-Measles threat? -check this out
      it will shock you.


      The CNN hacks are at it again. Drink the kool aid before it is gone.

      • #4 by Joe Imbriano on August 28, 2013 - 8:38 am

        That is a great article and I think after the Army run CNN gives enough traction to the story, I will do a post on it. Thank you for the link. It’s a gem.

      • #5 by bar none on August 28, 2013 - 2:23 pm

        The medical establishment does not deal in facts.

    • #6 by Joe Imbriano on February 18, 2014 - 9:30 pm

  2. #7 by amateur night on August 17, 2013 - 4:11 pm

    Hey man, Joe didn’t hit this one out of the park, I think he just bounced this sucker off of that Jet Blue flight carrying the cats from Executive Environmental at 25,000 feet over Acacia doing their second RF survey on their way back from Mccaren. Hope they know figured out how to use them masks and that machine.

  3. #11 by mom1 on August 17, 2013 - 6:41 pm

    Parents, this is another cue to wake up. What does it say about a society that does not care for its youngest members, but grants big corporations and governments the authority to usurp the rights of the parents.

    35 shots by age 6???

  4. #12 by Joe Imbriano on August 17, 2013 - 11:21 pm

    Trust the needle?


    What if this was still happening intentionally somewhere else today?

    • #13 by google it on October 21, 2013 - 1:11 pm

      It is possible that cancer viruses and dangerous nano technology compounds are in the inoculations. Is this an accident? People just don’t know what a normal child is anymore. People don’t even know what it is to feel normal anymore.

  5. #14 by welcome from science blog on August 18, 2013 - 1:20 pm


    August 18, 2013
    It never occurs to those under the spell that directed research provides the results desired by those who pay for it. It is real simple. Something is safe because there are no studies that prove that it is dangerous. Want to prove that something is safe? Sure irradiate the blood in the brain of a rat with 900 Mhz lets say 5 microwatts per cm2 for 20 minutes a day for 30 days, analyze brain blood circulation, no changes-therefore it is safe.

    Now lets look at 2.4 ghz @ 8 microwatts per cm2 for 6 hours a day for 180 days for one year on the female human eggs in 6 year old girls. This is what the exposure level and duration in the wireless classroom is for first grade girls.

    There are no studies. Period. When did they remove an egg from a 5 year old. They never will. Therefore it is safe.
    Make sure there are never any studies conducted objectively to show harmful effects. Easy, pull the strings in the right direction, later blame everything else for all the problems and tar and feather the thinkers as loons. Where are the studies with 180 days a year 6 hours a day 35 to a room with these things in their laps? Then add the home exposure. There are none. Therefore it is safe and those that dare to challenge are idiots, crackpots, cranks, and of course unqualified.

    The most incredible advances in human history did not come as a result intellectual arrogance, they came from the free thinking works of the average person in spite of the worst intentions of those that were least likely to be swayed by reality staring them in the face.

    It is easy to get behind what is popular, what is perceived safe and in good company. That is the herd mentality.

    You are enabling this eugenics plan to go forth and who knows, maybe you are pleased with the stealth attack on human fertility, its Autism by product . Maybe you are actually part of it. Maybe it is possible that your world view lends itself to just that. One thing is certain, you, and your children, if you have or ever plan on having any, will by default, been a participant in this long awaited study. It doesn’t have to be this way.

    • #15 by mom from Mass on August 28, 2013 - 12:27 pm

      What a breath of fresh air to see that the truth going forth in the Golden State. This is a great blog as it is really thought provoking and compelling at the same time.

  6. #16 by Patricia Ormsby on August 18, 2013 - 5:55 pm

    Joe, this is a great site! You are connecting the dots and providing good information in a way that will be meaningful to many. I have tried to address the EMF connection to chronic fatigue syndrome to the sufferers, but most are so addicted to their gadgets that they won’t listen. When it’s just their own problem, they rationalize, but if they have concerns about their kids’ future, maybe there is a chance they will listen.

    Thank you for the information on carbonyl iron–I’ll look into it. Long ago, when I was explaining my symptoms of EMF exposure to a friend, she told me it sounded exactly like anemia. Of course, this was her way of being skeptical, but now you are pointing out not only a definite connection, but also a way of ameliorating the damage.

    On the other hand, there are problems associated with iron overload as well, so reduction of EMF exposure is still crucial.

    I just received the link to your site from someone responding to my comment on vaccination in Dr. Mercola’s blog, who I don’t even think was aware of my electrosensitivity. I’ll tell others about your site, and post it on Mercola when the EMF topic comes up again.

  7. #17 by Anonymous on August 19, 2013 - 1:10 pm

    I am speechless, simply speechless.

  8. #18 by Anonymous on August 19, 2013 - 5:17 pm

    I have seven grandchildren 3 of which are in Fullerton schools. I spent 36 years in defense work back in the glory days when Howard Hughes owned the Fullerton plant. I have lived in this town my whole life. The things we used to do back then (that we workers knew about) would even frighten some of you by today’s standards.

    It is not that far fetched at all. It would be nice if I felt like I could argue with you. Society has changed so much for the worst and sadly Fullerton has really followed suit.

  9. #19 by amateur night on August 19, 2013 - 9:11 pm

    Should have called it “the cull”. If the shoe fits.

  10. #20 by from wirelesswatchblog on August 20, 2013 - 6:40 am

    Wireless Watch Blog:

    Is the global wireless revolution a population reduction project?

    There is an intriguing possibility that the global torrent of ever-increasing wireless radiation might be an important link in a furtive master plan to drastically reduce the world’s population. We have a number of important clues that microwaves could be used as an effective form of contraception, administered covertly to the world’s masses through seductive technological means.

    Research has shown that rodents exposed to cell phone radiation have less testosterone in their bloodstreams, resulting in diminished sexual activity.71 In 2008, a public health agency in Norway published a study of navy personnel exposed to radio frequency electromagnetic radiation. It showed that the greater the exposure to this radiation, the higher the prevalence of involuntary childlessness.72

    Greek researchers studying the effects of radio frequency on rodent reproduction placed groups of mice in strategic locations to ensure their irradiation from a broadcasting RF antenna farm. Mice who received less than 1 microwatt/cm2 had a progressive decrease in newborns and became irreversibly sterile after five generations. The mice receiving a tad over 1 microwatt/cm2 regressed to sterility after only three generations.73

    A most interesting clue comes from a 1985 Chinese study titled “Effects of Microwave Contraception on Human Serum Testosterone and Luteinizing Hormone.” The study was conducted on human males and the abstract states that “…the microwave dose used for contraception seems to cause damage in Leydig cell function….and then influence(s) endocrine function of testis.”74 It is not clear from this report exactly what microwave dose was found by the Chinese to be contraceptive. But the fact that today’s cell phone radiation is widely documented as damaging, even lethal to human sperm cells, suggests that our dangerously high emission and exposure standards could have been set specifically for their potent contraceptive potential.

    Greek researchers at the University of Athens confirmed in 2006 that GSM 900 and 1800 (digital) megahertz radiation has a radical impact on the ability of living creatures to reproduce. These frequencies are within the realm of wireless radiation being broadcast across America for mobile services. The drosophila (fruit fly) was chosen for this study because the insect’s cellular processes are identical to those of humans. Only a few minutes of exposure to this cell phone radiation per day—at power intensities now common in our environment—cut the insects’ ability to reproduce by 60 percent. Both sexes were affected.

    Of great importance was the finding that exposed male flies suffered DNA fragmentation in their gonadal cells and the females showed induced cell death in a large number of their ovarian egg chambers. The researchers warned, “…Digital mobile telephony radiation nowadays exert an intense biological action able to kill cells, damage DNA or decrease dramatically the reproductive capacity of living organisms.”75

    Chilling is the possibility that there might exist a mindset among ruling elites that humans who make it through the gauntlet of pre-conception radiation and radiation-induced spontaneous abortion should have their lives drastically shortened to spare societies the economic burden of elderly people.

    Governments and the wireless communications industry stampeding humanity into compulsory and continuous wireless exposure are undoubtedly apprised of the hundreds of medical studies demonstrating that low level communications microwaves not only initiate, but also nourish and promote human cancers.76 The perpetrators must also be aware of the widespread circulatory and cardiac damage being unleashed by the wireless revolution. Cell phone radiation quickly causes red blood cells to clump together and also to leak hemoglobin. These abnormal blood conditions can precipitate heart disease, kidney stones and strokes.77

    A recent medical study found that both fetuses and newborns exposed to cell phone radiation while their mothers conversed for 10 minutes experienced significant increases in heart rate and worrisome decreases in cardiac output.78 Thus we see that the wireless age endangers the life blood, even the very hearts of the tiny ones fated to be born as “Generation X’d Out.”

    What can we do to save the babies?

    An amoral and ravenous congressional-military-industrial complex has groomed the youngsters of Generation X-ray to become hard-core patriots of wireless technology in the same ruthless way the asbestos and tobacco industries seduced and murdered generations past. The Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA) boasts on its website that teenagers, defined as a “huge consumer market segment,” are currently pumping $100 billion a year into the industry’s coffers.79

    Deceived and used as pawns, our youngsters are left utterly ignorant concerning the devastating wireless radiation hazards to themselves and their posterity. When young people are told about the hazards of anything, they traditionally discard the facts and pursue their chosen avenues of self gratification as predictable acts of rebellion.

    Generation X-ray is no different in its obsession with wireless conveniences; it seems content to live in a self-absorbed universe devoid of logic, critical thinking and accountability. Many youth appear incapable of caring about future generations. We are no longer a nation of healthy free-thinkers, but a nation of obsessive, sickly phone button punchers, virtual game players and compulsive text messengers.

    Source: http://www.wirelesswatchblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/genxdout1.htm

  11. #21 by "Are We Cooking Our Eggs?" on August 20, 2013 - 6:43 am

    Are we cooking our eggs?

    Perhaps no tissue in the human body is more radiation sensitive than the “granulosa” cells of the developing and mature ovarian follicles in human female ovaries. Human females are born with their eggs. The chemical or radiation damage sustained by these cells before women conceive absolutely determines the success of future pregnancies, as well as the health of babies. But how many school girls today understand that sitting with wireless computers on their laps exposes their ova to the equivalent of continuous X-radiation?

    “Cell phones give off radiation any time they are turned on so that they can communicate with base stations,” says IOU Bloomfield, PhD, professor of physics at the University of Virginia.8 This means that even on stand-by, a cell phone emits imperceptible radio signals into the body of a woman wearing that phone near her ovaries.

    Frequency tests show that cell phone radiation is the most powerful during the signaling phase. When the phone rings, it begins abruptly transmitting microwaves at a power density that may spike up to over 100 microwatts per centimeter squared (100uW/cm2). This near-field dose is at least 1,000 times higher than microwave power densities shown in laboratory tests to have numerous biological repercussions in animals and human beings. This dose is also 1,000 times higher than the maximum exposure limit currently recommended for humans by the 2007 BioInitiative Report. Leading scientists who contributed to this master work compiled hundreds of medical studies in order to arrive at a consensus recommendation that human exposure to pulsed microwaves be limited to no more than 0.1uW/cm2. 9

    At greatest risk for microwave radiation damage is the mitochondrion organelle within each female egg cell. The mitochondrion is a tiny, membrane-enclosed “power plant” which generates the cell’s supply of chemical energy (ATP). Mitochondria are involved in a range of processes such as signaling, cellular differentiation and cell death, as well as controlling cell growth. Within each mitochondrion are up to one million molecules of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Once damaged, the mtDNA are incapable of repairing themselves due to their low histone protein content.

    UK physicist and radiation expert Professor Barrie Trower explains how wireless microwaves can radically alter human genetics through mitochondrial damage: “Permanent low level microwave exposure induces chronic nitrosative and oxidative stress to human cells. The mitochondrial DNA is even more susceptible to this stress than the DNA in the cell nucleus and it can become irreversibly damaged. Damaged mtDNA causes mitochondropathy, which is transmitted by the maternal egg from mother to daughter through each succeeding generation forever. Mitochondropathy is at the root of many inheritable illnesses including MS, Parkinson’s, diabetes, arteriosclerosis, Alzheimer’s and cancer.”10

    Each time a wireless device begins transmitting data near a woman’s ovaries, that radiation endangers the integrity of the mtDNA in egg cells slated to become embryos. Yet millions of girls and young women wear and utilize these wireless X-rayers near their reproductive organs with no informed concern whatsoever.

    Source: Are we cooking our eggs?

    Perhaps no tissue in the human body is more radiation sensitive than the “granulosa” cells of the developing and mature ovarian follicles in human female ovaries. Human females are born with their eggs. The chemical or radiation damage sustained by these cells before women conceive absolutely determines the success of future pregnancies, as well as the health of babies. But how many school girls today understand that sitting with wireless computers on their laps exposes their ova to the equivalent of continuous X-radiation?

    “Cell phones give off radiation any time they are turned on so that they can communicate with base stations,” says IOU Bloomfield, PhD, professor of physics at the University of Virginia.8 This means that even on stand-by, a cell phone emits imperceptible radio signals into the body of a woman wearing that phone near her ovaries.

    Frequency tests show that cell phone radiation is the most powerful during the signaling phase. When the phone rings, it begins abruptly transmitting microwaves at a power density that may spike up to over 100 microwatts per centimeter squared (100uW/cm2). This near-field dose is at least 1,000 times higher than microwave power densities shown in laboratory tests to have numerous biological repercussions in animals and human beings. This dose is also 1,000 times higher than the maximum exposure limit currently recommended for humans by the 2007 BioInitiative Report. Leading scientists who contributed to this master work compiled hundreds of medical studies in order to arrive at a consensus recommendation that human exposure to pulsed microwaves be limited to no more than 0.1uW/cm2. 9

    At greatest risk for microwave radiation damage is the mitochondrion organelle within each female egg cell. The mitochondrion is a tiny, membrane-enclosed “power plant” which generates the cell’s supply of chemical energy (ATP). Mitochondria are involved in a range of processes such as signaling, cellular differentiation and cell death, as well as controlling cell growth. Within each mitochondrion are up to one million molecules of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Once damaged, the mtDNA are incapable of repairing themselves due to their low histone protein content.

    UK physicist and radiation expert Professor Barrie Trower explains how wireless microwaves can radically alter human genetics through mitochondrial damage: “Permanent low level microwave exposure induces chronic nitrosative and oxidative stress to human cells. The mitochondrial DNA is even more susceptible to this stress than the DNA in the cell nucleus and it can become irreversibly damaged. Damaged mtDNA causes mitochondropathy, which is transmitted by the maternal egg from mother to daughter through each succeeding generation forever. Mitochondropathy is at the root of many inheritable illnesses including MS, Parkinson’s, diabetes, arteriosclerosis, Alzheimer’s and cancer.”10

    Each time a wireless device begins transmitting data near a woman’s ovaries, that radiation endangers the integrity of the mtDNA in egg cells slated to become embryos. Yet millions of girls and young women wear and utilize these wireless X-rayers near their reproductive organs with no informed concern whatsoever.

    Source: http://www.wirelesswatchblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/genxdout1.htm

    • #22 by Joe Imbriano on August 20, 2013 - 9:27 am

      Based on the mindset of the school officials and their worshipers at the local, county, state and even federal levels, none this can be true since it can’t be looked up, proven by EXISTING studies, and verified-the logic of a “list verifier”. By the way, these wireless tablets make children 2 dimensional thinking “list verifiers”

      Let me give you an example of how dangerous a “list verifier” is when they are in position of influence. During WWII, many believed that concept of Nazi extermination camps were a fallacy. Consequently barring direct observation and filmed evidence for their existence, the ovens roared for many more months. Millions were raped, tortured, electrocuted, bludgeoned, starved, experimented on, gassed, buried alive, had their unborn children ripped from their wombs and turned into lampshades in part because of the “list verifier” mentality. Fortunately there were those that could think critically:

      “Instinct is something which transcends knowledge. We have, undoubtedly, certain finer fibers that enable us to perceive truths when logical deduction, or any other willful effort of the brain, is futile.” -Nikola Tesla

      My hope is that there are those of you that can see past the fact, that by design, the studies on impacts to FEMALE HUMAN FERTILITY don’t exist and will never be publicly conducted outside of the current classroom setting. The results will never be made widely known until it will have been far too late.

      I submit to all of you that we have the same forces at work with officials operating with the “list verifier” mentality making assurances of total safety like Robert Pletka.

      Tell me ladies and gentleman, is the convenience of wireless technology really worth it? I will be a “list verifier” for a second. Show me the studies that it is safe and has NO effects on female fertility. Then I will believe that it is safe. See, I can wear that hat over my tin foil one for a nanosecond and so can all of you. There is too much on the line folks. You can provide for retirement, save for college, put the seatbelts on in the car, helmets on for the bike rides and you can bank your children’s lineage on Robert Pletka’s statement and reassurances of “total safety” for the children:http://fsd.k12.ca.us/parent_resources/files/wireless.pdf. You can also call me a conspiracy theorist and a nut job if you wish. None of which changes what is happening to the children as we speak.

      • #23 by Anonymous on August 20, 2013 - 12:01 pm

        Normal naturally occuring maximum background levels at 2.4 GHz of the microwave portion of the electromagnetic spectrum is .0000000000002652519893899204 microwatts per square centimeter.

        Wireless classroom microwave levels are anywhere from 3.0-13.0 microwatts per square centimeters depending on the types of technology being deployed.

        Note the location of the decimal places.

        • #24 by Joe Imbriano on August 20, 2013 - 1:56 pm

          I guess when they refer to it is being “extremely low power”, that is coming from a statistical frame of reference that even a mathematician would have a hard time with.

          The laser at the grocery store check stand is low power. Look at it, stick your eye over it and see what happens. The potential biological harm that something like an optical laser or pulsed microwave radiation can cause is a direct function of the tissue’s sensitivity to its absorption or exposure. The non-thermal effects of optical lasers can damage tissue that is optically sensitive such as the retina, whereas the laser is virtually harmless to the epidermis and keratin. Electromagnetic emissions have similar dual properties-thermal and electromagnetic interactions. The frame of reference is crucial. I believe we are being lied to at the highest levels all the way down to the where the rubber meets the road.

          • #25 by Dublin on August 21, 2013 - 2:13 am

            One cannot ignore the simple facts outlined here. This amount of radiation simply puts us a million years behind of the evolutionary process in terms of living systems ability to adapt.

    • #26 by Anonymous on August 21, 2013 - 10:55 pm

      She wrote some great material. Thank you for keeping her message alive. It has become all the more relevant today.

  12. #27 by The Radiation Poisoning of America on August 20, 2013 - 5:29 pm

    From: The Radiation Poisoning of America

    America must soon face its radiation cataclysm. The EMR Network says that millions of workers occupy worksites on a daily basis where operating antenna arrays are camouflaged [File] file ]and where no RF safety program is carried out. Thanks to shameless predatory advertising techniques, American youth are now literally addicted to “texting,” watching TV and accessing the Internet on tiny wireless screens. These are the toys that keep cell towers and WiFi hot spots buzzing. A nation that requires compulsory mass irradiation to fuel its trivial entertainment needs is surely destined to have a sickly and short-lived population.
    Right now, 11.7 million Americans have been diagnosed with cancer. Because humans can harbor cancer conditions for years before detection, additional millions of cancer victims are yet undiagnosed. The Journal of Oncology Practice predicts that, by 2020, there will be so many cancer cases in the U.S. that doctors may not be able to cope with their caseloads. The report concludes the nation could soon face a shortage of up to 4,000 cancers specialists. [38] .
    A recent CBS news series on the raging American cancer epidemic left viewers with the mindset that trainloads of federal cash must flow if we are to find the cancer answer. But a proven cancer initiator now inundates our cities, roadways, schools, offices and homes. Any environmental stressor that jackhammers human cells at millions to billions of cycles per second is a cancer factor. Any wave- pollution that breaks the DNA and causes pre-cancerous micronuclei in human blood is a cancer factor. Logic tells us that there will be no “answer to cancer” until we eliminate the cancer factors. .
    Wireless communications radiation is to America today what DDT, thalidomide, dioxin, benzene, Agent Orange and asbestos were yesterday. Historically, the truth about the public health menace of extreme toxins is never told until thousands sicken and die. .
    Dr. Robert Becker, noted for decades of research on the effects of electromagnetic radiation, has warned: “Even if we survive the chemical and atomic threats to our existence, there is the strong possibility that increasing electropollution could set in motion irreversible changes leading to our extinction before we are even aware of them. All life pulsates in time to the earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all organisms. [Public version: The Microwave Syndrome] . These energies are too dangerous to entrust forever to politicians, military leaders and their lapdog researchers.” [39] .
    Our mission to save the nation’s health and restore sanity in the wireless age seems daunting. The wireless juggernaut is an aggressive, mean machine. Federal regulators are clearly compromised and incompetent to protect the public health. Uninformed consumers dearly love their magic digital toys and don’t yet understand the connection between those toys and a national raging cancer epidemic that may consume us all. .
    Powerful economic interests have lied to us long enough. Americans deserve the facts. We need dialogue. Wireless radiation is a form of electronic trespass. America must decide whose rights are more important”idlers beaming death rays for piddling gibberish or the elderly with pacemakers who are made ill by cell phone and tower radiation wherever they go. Must we all prematurely perish so that wireless enthusiasts can capture cell phone photos and instantly send them for processing via carcinogen express? Must all neighborhoods become sick zones so that radiation addicts can receive recipes, ads and other frivolous text messages on their cell phone toys? Does a human being have the right to NOT be forcibly WiMAXED into a coffin, or do only wireless providers and their devotees have rights?

    Source: http://www.next-up.org/pdf/AmyWorthingtonTheRadiationPoisoningOfAmerica17112007.pdf

  13. #28 by What Can We Do? on August 20, 2013 - 5:32 pm

    From: The Radiation Poisoning of America

    What can we do?. .
    We can commit to join the growing radiation awareness movement and continue educating ourselves and others. We can employ digital and audio radiation detectors to help safeguard our personal health and to demonstrate the ceaseless brutality of ubiquitous wireless radiation which threatens the genetic integrity of future generations. We can promote emerging technologies that could make communications technologies safer. .
    We can demand that federal radiation exposure standards and setback requirements be updated to reflect the realities of modern science. Federal communications law must be rewritten so that local jurisdictions can regain their right to consider health and environment when reviewing wireless siting applications. We can insist that wireless emissions from transmitters be drastically reduced as they are in Austria and Russia. We can demand routine compliance testing at all transmitter sites. We can see to it that people who have been living and working near powerful transmitters be given opportunity to report their resulting illnesses in national surveys. Proper epidemiological studies must be conducted and their results published and broadly disseminated. .
    Each of us can break the seductive, but oppressive wireless habit ourselves. We can play no game, use no wireless Internet system, make no trivial phone call that necessitates enlarging America’s dense forest of wireless transmitters. If no one buys WiMAX-enabled devices and related services, this dangerous system will fail. .
    Whenever possible, we can go back to the old-fashioned, corded phones and message machines which made yesteryear a far more healthy time. Cordless household and office phones emit powerful megahertz or gigahertz microwave radiation, causing damage to hearing, eyesight and brain function. DECT cordless phones irradiate a huge area even when not in use. We can encourage others to contact us by conventional land line phones only. Can we enjoy a leisurely conversation knowing that an irradiated caller risks disease and disability for mindless chatter? What good is wireless convenience if it means being ultimately tethered to a hospital bed? We can teach our children that health is more important than passing convenience and instant gratification. .
    According to OSHA, no environment should be deliberately made hazardous. Backed by current scientific knowledge, we can refuse to work or shop in an environment which endangers our health. We can demand that megahertz and gigahertz cordless phones, walkie talkie radios, WLAN and WiFi systems be removed from schools, offices, hospitals and any public place where people are grossly irradiated without their informed consent. Second hand smoke is bad; second hand radiation is worse. .
    We wish to thank the courageous radiation victims interviewed for this report who have generously revealed the details of their personal suffering in order to warn others. Following their example, we must continue undaunted in the moral quest to protect the national health and restore the world to sanity before it is too late.

    Source: http://www.next-up.org/pdf/AmyWorthingtonTheRadiationPoisoningOfAmerica17112007.pdf

  14. #29 by Dublin on August 21, 2013 - 2:01 am

    What is being alleged here cannot be ignored by any sane, rational human being. My regards to Mr. Imbriano and his dedication to an issue that affects us all. God speed.

  15. #30 by soylent green on August 21, 2013 - 8:25 am

    Your grammatical error laden rant is a rather unconventional technique. I must admit that I found it rather entertaining. Unequivocally, the most cogent point of your hyperbole ridden expose on the human cattle condition is how it all really begins to end at the kindergarten registration desk. Mr. Imbriano, be watchful where you trod with information like this.

    While your intentions appear to be selfless and truly noble and your passion running deep, most assuredly I tell you that there are those whose passions are equally as deep. Bearing that in mind, that as you so cleverly allude to, there are those whose intentions are the farthest thing from being noble. I am certain that you are fully cognizant of this, but nonetheless, I felt compelled to warn you. Be careful.

    • #31 by Joe Imbriano on August 22, 2013 - 8:50 am

      That was a great movie by the way.

      I knew the risks before I began this quest. I am not concerned as the truth matters far more. Be careful, yes all of you need to be careful. In terms of the human component, your children vastly outnumber me and they are the subjects of this experiment.

  16. #32 by john birched on August 21, 2013 - 2:28 pm

    This is the wildest conspiracy theory that I have ever heard. You ought to turn out a script for this thing.

    • #33 by amateur night on August 21, 2013 - 7:27 pm

      Takes you back does it? You know the tin foil hat may be on its way back in. Bircher were ya? Not many of you guys left these days.

  17. #34 by paulette on August 22, 2013 - 8:10 am

    Mr. Imbriano, I don’t immunize my children for various reasons and I agree with you. I don’t understand some of the things you mention here but I am sure they line up. Most people simply don’t understand what is really being done to their children.

    I just don’t get why on earth ABC hired Jenny McCarthy to host The View when she is the most widely recognized outspoken critic of vaccinations. This makes no sense to me. Even from their supposed public health standpoint it is baffling. The medical community is up in arms over this especially up in Canada. Everywhere else I look and read, the push to immunize keeps growing.

    What is going on here? I am curious as to what your take is on that.

    • #35 by Joe Imbriano on August 22, 2013 - 9:19 am

      Thank you for heeding the warnings over vaccine dangers. I believe given the sheer number of vaccines and the contents being totally questionable, you have made the right decision.

      http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state hypothesizes that Autism is a disease of electromagnetic exposure.

      I believe that she is a red herring. I believe that ABC has hired her simply to keep people’s eyes on the vaccine connection and not on the rapidly emerging hypothesis that has been put forth that wireless emissions are primarily responsible. It would make sense to put the diversion back out there while the full wireless immersion of the entire human race is well underway. I believe there is a much larger agenda at work and the Autism epidemic is simply an unintended consequence and by product of this insidious plan to affect fertility.

      Please get the word out on this issue.

      • #36 by paulette on August 22, 2013 - 11:02 am

        You make so much sense. I know a lot of moms who agree with what you are doing. It is the husbands that don’t want to get involved. I hope to God that you are wrong but in my heart of hearts, I really believe you are right. This is so sad. I never knew such evil.

      • #37 by Wilma Miles on January 11, 2015 - 3:13 am

        I am researching the fraud and corruption in the telecommunications industry.Cellphone companies believe they are invincible,because of a 1996 law,whereby they believe they cannot be sued.Here is the interesting bit.In 2012,an Italian court allowed expert witnesses to testify on behalf of the plaintiff.He sued because he got brain cancer from his cellphone.The Italian judge ruled in his favor,and gave more credence to the independent research used as evidence than to the defense’s statements.This was a benchmark case,opening the door for many more cases to follow.In 2014,for the first time ever,in the USA,an American judge has allowed expert witnesses to testify on behalf of the plaintiffs,who are suing,claiming that their brain cancer were caused by cell phones.The judge has allowed this case to go to trial.Please read the following links and the statements made by the judge.This case is ongoing now in 2015.You will see the legal similarities with autism. With this landmark ruling the cases are moving forward to fact discovery.”http://www.emfacts.com/2014/08/major-breakthrough-in-cellphone-industry-product-liability-lawsuit-in-usa/

        Defendants are Motorola Inc. Qualcomm Inc. Nokia Inc. Audiovox Communications Corp. Samsung Telecomm American LLC.http://www.emfacts.com/2014/08/major-breakthrough-in-cellphone-industry-product-liability-lawsuit-in-usa/

        Each of the plaintiffs suffers from a brain tumor or is suing for a family of someone who died of brain cancer.http://www.emfacts.com/2014/08/major-breakthrough-in-cellphone-industry-product-liability-lawsuit-in-usa/

        2012 Italian courts dismissed research co-financed by the mobile phone industry including the WHO Interphone study. http://www.emfacts.com/2012/10/italian-court-ruling-links-mobile-phone-use-to-tumour/

        2012 Courts relied on epidemiologic research by Lennart Hardell &colleagues in Sweden consistent evidence of increased brain tumor risk

        Research which was co-financed by the Telecom industry was of lower quality and was less likely to report evidence of increased tumor risk

        Authors of these studies dismissed the evidence of risk they did uncover as artifactual http://www.emfacts.com/2012/10/italian-court-ruling-links-mobile-phone-use-to-tumour/
        There is no reason why their should not be a class action lawsuit against the makers of vaccine as well.Just like the cellphone companies,they are not above the law.If there is evidence of wrongdoing they CAN be sued.Hope this is helpful.

  18. #38 by Jamie on August 28, 2013 - 8:22 am

  19. #39 by bar none on August 28, 2013 - 2:56 pm

    The best anti-vax rant I have ever read or seen in my entire life. Right on!

  20. #40 by grateful on August 29, 2013 - 1:46 pm

    Mr. Imbriano, thank you for your information and your efforts. You have really opened my eyes. I don’t believe that one can turn back after seeing the world through this perspective. Most of these things NEVER EVER crossed my mind. I guess we are all really brainwashed.

  21. #41 by Robert on August 30, 2013 - 1:14 pm

    Words well spoken Mr. Imbriano, well spoken indeed. Let the truth be told. You push the envelope like no one I have ever met. Such a rarity these days.

  22. #42 by End game? on September 1, 2013 - 9:33 pm

    Wake Up Call – New World Order (Documentary)

  23. #43 by Anonymous on September 3, 2013 - 10:32 pm

    Damn, this guy is so right on that it is sick. Wake the …. up people.

  24. #44 by Patricia on September 4, 2013 - 5:47 am

    I want to thank you for cutting so deep with your words. I am a mother of 4 from Indiana. For a long time I have felt what you have spoken. I know that there are many mothers that feel the same way. The problem is that the men don’t want to get involved. All of the information out there, the influences, requirements and laws are so overwhelming. Can you direct to more information on the vaccine issue? There are so many websites and who do you trust? Thank you again Mr. Imbriano, you really are a brave man. We need more men like you that are willing to take a stand especially when it involves the children.

    • #45 by Anonymous on September 5, 2013 - 2:11 pm

      He makes some very serious and thought provoking claims here, no doubt about it. One needs to look really inwardly as we face this head on in terms of how to navigate all of this.

  25. #47 by Robyn on September 16, 2013 - 7:43 pm

    This is a great article Joe.

    I ran across this write up on measles today and thought that your audience might benefit from it as well: http://gianelloni.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/why-all-the-measles-outbreaks/?blogsub=confirming#subscribe-blogmely

    Thank you for what you are doing.

  26. #49 by Joe Imbriano on October 20, 2013 - 11:21 am

    Open your eyes folks


    You think that it’s all about the interests of public health? Is that why they feed the kids the USDA hormone and antibiotic laden chocolate milk, bleached flour and corn syrup? You think it’s all about money? They want into the children’s bloodstreams for a reason folks.

    By the time the children get to kindergarten they have been given 49 doses of 14 different vaccines all under a color of law mandate being perpetrated by the school district office staff with the superintendent’s blessing. They simply continue hiding the waivers by stashing them in a special drawer in the office instead of providing them in the enrollment packets. All this is just so they can be enrolled and get irradiated for the next 13 years in school and even more in college and then for the rest of their natural lives at work and at home.

    Where do you think this is all heading ladies and gentlemen? I believe that it is all about fertility. Open your eyes folks.

    • #50 by Anonymous on October 20, 2013 - 3:56 pm

      People simply don’t know about these waivers and besides, most think their children could get sick and die if they don’t receive all of their recommended immunizations.
      Given Ray’s comment about the media being controlled by six corporations, the mindset that you possess may simply remain just your own.

      I did’t vaccinate my daughter for junior high entry last year and the staff at Brea gave me quite the attitude, but I held my ground. It takes some courage to steer clear of all of this but it’s doable. After reading and watching this, I am all the more convinced that I have done the right thing.

      • #51 by Anonymous on October 21, 2013 - 2:22 pm

        I heard that they can take your children if you don’t immunize them.

        • #52 by Joe Imbriano on October 21, 2013 - 10:12 pm

          Children cannot be removed from the parents by the child welfare agents unless they are considered to be in “Imminent danger”. Medical neglect is certainly grounds for at the very least, an investigation by the child welfare authorities. However, refusing to immunize based on sincerely held religious beliefs is not considered medical neglect and is perfectly legal in California as well as in most states: http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx

          There is a difference between failing to and refusing to vaccinate. You must be informed, know your rights and as such, remain free to exercise them. You rights to opt out of so called compulsory immunizations are still protected under the First Amendment and this is still a Constitutional Republic. We, as a people still have our rights as long as we don’t abdicate our responsibilities in terms of knowing them and standing up for them. You at the very least owe that to your children.

  27. #53 by Bloomberg pushes immunizations on October 21, 2013 - 9:12 pm

    • #54 by Joe Imbriano on October 22, 2013 - 8:49 am

      I believe vaccines are nothing more than a slick eugenics program with race specific components engineered into the different batches utilizing nano technology delivery systems which can be acted upon and activated by RF microwave emissions. Call me what you want folks.

      Yeah we still get to drive the 110 year old technology, 6,000 pound steel sleds to work belching toxic emissions while we sit in our 12X12 jail cells microwaving hot pockets or downing trans fat sludge every night in front of the blue glow’s flicker rate manipulation of our minds, as our kids get injected in the pediatricians’ chairs, fluoridated in the dentist’s chairs and irradiated in the classroom chairs. Mindless diversions all over the idiot box keep mom and dad sucking their thumbs while the brains and birthrights are being sucked right out of this generation.

      We are shown and given technology that is conservatively 50 years behind what is clandestinely in use by the elite. I cannot believe how so many fall for it hook line and sinker. How do you expect there to exist something so utterly ridiculous as “public health” when everyone is being fed solid and liquid poison, injected and irradiated? The stuff in the stores ain’t food gang. The fruits and veggies are grown, for the most part for all intents and purposes in toxic soil which has virtually become sand, and watered with petrochemical fertilizers. You and your children are being fed and bathed in poison. Your kids are not being taught how to grow real food so they will be happy living in a 100 story concrete building with no windows eating food out of boxes and cans with WiFi everywhere powering the endless tablets and screens that are glued to their faces. It is all because you have decided to stop reading the ingredient lists and the handwriting on the wall.

      The so called safety net called Medicine is actually a black widow’s web and for the most part is a total fraud if you haven’t figured that out yet.

      The loving Obama care with it’s special phone number is all about forced vaccinations, ladies and gentlemen. Roll up your kids sleeves or open your eyes, the choice is yours folks.

      • #55 by Blake on October 22, 2013 - 1:23 pm

        Joe, you are really pushing the envelope. This is really intense stuff. Thanks to your efforts, this issue can no longer be ignored in your town.

        You have yet to disappoint since you launched several months ago. There are a lot of us watching this from England. You couldn’t have been more true to your word with your first post and your mission statement. Fight the good fight. Cheers my friend.

  28. #57 by Vaccine history on October 31, 2013 - 8:17 am

    Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries of Official Statistics


    • #58 by the oracle on October 31, 2013 - 3:24 pm

      Trust not what you see and do not trust what you cannot. Question everything. Look around.

  29. #59 by Anonymous on November 14, 2013 - 2:08 pm

  30. #60 by vaccine history on December 14, 2013 - 7:11 am

    “In 1871-2, England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. (The Hadwen Documents)

    – In Germany, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. (Don`t Get Stuck, Hannah Allen)

    – In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both polio vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children had been injected with these vaccines. (Med Jnl of Australia 17/3/1973 p555)

    – In 1967, Ghana was declared measles free by the World Health Organisation after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. (Dr H Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, March 1990)

    – In the UK between 1970 and 1990, over 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. (Community Disease Surveillance Centre, UK)

    – In the 1970`s a tuberculosis vaccine trial in India involving 260,000 people revealed that more cases of TB occurred in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. (The Lancet 12/1/80 p73)

    – In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk, who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts” )

    – In 1978, a survey of 30 States in the US revealed that more than half of the children who contracted measles had been adequately vaccinated. (The People`s Doctor, Dr R Mendelsohn)”

    “Historical Data Shows Vaccines are Not what Saved Us”
    “Government report links thimerosal laden vaccines to neurological disorders”
    chinesehealthandfitness. com/ArticlePage1.html

  31. #61 by Rhonda on January 10, 2015 - 9:59 pm

    This is an excellent article.

  32. #62 by Joe Imbriano on January 11, 2015 - 12:13 pm


    Folks unborn children are fed total garbage by their moms for the 9 months they are trapped in the womb being force fed aspartame, microwaved foods, ding dongs and all kinds of crap with a lap top, ipad and cell phone blasting away at their developing body, brain and reproductive organs. When they get ready to head out through the birth canal, they get drugged with pitocin, and narcotic pain killers. When they finally make it out a syringe full of synthetic vitamin K and live Hepatitis is injected into their blood streams AFTER HALF OF THEIR BLOOD SUPPLY ENDS UP IN A STAINLESS STEEL BOWL FROM CLAMPING THE UMBILICAL CORD IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PLACENTAL BLOOD TRANSFER. They are then are fed coffee creamer full of synthetic toxic vitamins called infant formula for months instead of breast milk. For the first year of their lives they a a pediatric pin cushion being fed crap once out of the womb. For the next 4 years it gets worse and finally they end up on the school lunch program getting forcible irradiated all day at school with wireless microwave radiation and at home as well. It is no wonder these kids get sick all of the time and succumb.

    Folks you have to wonder why they want to jam 40 shots into every last 5 year in the country when kids are literally EATING PURE GARBAGE FAKE FOOD. I mean come on, you can’t make you kid a sandwich so you gotta by this crustable crap frozen fake peanut butter and jelly sandwiches with the crust removed? You can peel them a darn orange you go give them Sunny D loaded with bromine fire retardant compounds? You can’t manage to get them to eat real food just the landfill loving lunchables with the cookies and frosting? DID YOU EVER WONDER WHY THEY DRUG OUR KIDS, POISON OUR KIDS AND FORCIBLY VACCINATE OUR KIDS? WHAT THE HECK IS IN THOSE THINGS? YOU WILL NEVER KNOW UNTIL IT IS TOO LATE.

  33. #63 by What is Measles? on January 12, 2015 - 11:09 am

    What is Measles?
    Measles is a very contagious disease that produces a pink rash all over the body. It is caused by a virus that affects the respiratory system, skin, and eyes. The first symptoms appear about 10 days after becoming infected. A fever, cough, and runny nose develop, and the eyes become red, watery and sensitive to light. The fever may reach 105 degrees F (41 degrees C). Small pink spots with gray-white centers develop inside the mouth. A few days later, pink spots break out on the face. The rash then spreads all over the body. Once the rash reaches the feet — in two or three days — the fever drops and the runny nose and cough disappear. The rash on other parts of the body begins to fade, and the infected person starts to feel better.

    Antibiotics and drugs do not work to shorten the duration or alleviate the symptoms of measles once it is contracted. Treatment mainly consists of allowing the disease to run its course. However, cool sponge baths and soothing lotions to relieve the itchy rash may be helpful. Drinking lots of liquids to prevent dehydration is recom-mended as well. The disease confers permanent immunity; the infected person will not contract it again.

    Is measles dangerous?
    Prior to the 1960s, most children in the United States and Canada caught measles. Complications from the disease were unlikely. Previously healthy children usually recovered without incident.(1) However, measles can be dangerous in populations newly exposed to the virus,(2) and in malnourished children living in undeveloped countries.(3,4) Ear infections, pneumonia, brain damage (subacute sclerosing panencephalitis), and death are some of the possibilities.(5) In advanced countries, measles can be severe when it infects people living in impoverished communities with poor nutrition, sanitation, and inadequate health care.(6) Complications are also more likely when the disease strikes infants, adults, and anyone with a compromised immune system.(7)

    Scare Tactics: Doctors and other health authorities often try to frighten parents about measles by exaggerating the risks. For example, vaccine pamphlets published by the CDC claim that 1 out of every 1000 children who contract measles will get encephalitis, an infection of the brain.(8) However, Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, renowned pediatrician and vaccine researcher, had this to say: “The incidence of 1/1000 may be accurate for children who live in conditions of poverty and malnutrition” but for just about everyone else “the incidence of true encephalitis is probably more like 1/10,000 or 1/100,000.”(9) Furthermore, about 75 percent of these cases will not show evidence of brain damage.(10)

    Vitamin A and Nutrition: Several studies show that when patients with measles are given vitamin A supplements, their complication rates and chances of dying are significantly reduced. For example, as early as 1932 doctors used cod-liver oil — high in vitamin A — to treat measles and lower mortality by 58 percent.(11) Studies conducted in 1958 and 1961 confirmed that the wild measles virus has a severe short-term effect on immunity and the child’s nutritional status, especially vitamin A and nitrogen metabolism.(12,13) But antibiotics — later shown to be ineffective at treating measles — soon replaced vitamin A therapy, and by the 1960s vaccinations gained preference over treatment protocols. However, during the mid-1980s new studies demonstrated an increased risk of diarrhea, respiratory disease, and death in children with mild vitamin A deficiency.(14,15)

    In a 1987 study conducted in Tanzania, Africa, 180 children with measles were randomly divided into two groups and received routine treatment alone or with 200,000 i.u. of orally administered vitamin A. Mortality rates in the vitamin A group were cut in half. In fact, children under two years of age who did not receive vitamin A were nearly eight times more likely to die (Figure 1).(16)

    In 1990, the New England Journal of Medicine confirmed that vitamin A supplements significantly reduce measles complication and death rates.(17) In 1992, researchers measured vitamin A levels in children with measles and determined that deficiencies were associated with lower levels of measles-specific antibodies, higher and longer lasting fevers, and a greater probability of being hospitalized.(18) The authors of the study recommended Vitamin A therapy for children under two years of age with severe measles.(19) And a 1993 study showed that 72 percent of all measles cases in the U.S. requiring hospitalization are deficient in vitamin A. The greater the deficiency, the worse the complications and higher the probability of dying.(20)

    Malnutrition is clearly responsible for higher disease complication and death rates.(21) According to David Morley, infectious disease expert, “Severity of measles is greatest in the developing countries where children have nutritional deficiencies… The child with severe measles and an immune system suppressed by malnutrition secretes the virus three times longer than does a child with normal nutrition.”(22) Dr. Viera Scheibner, vaccine researcher, summarizes the data more succinctly: “Children in Third World countries need improved vitamin A and general nutritional status, not vaccines.”(23)

    Fever Reducers: Poor nutrition and a vitamin A deficiency are not the only factors known to increase measles complication and mortality rates. Standard treatment protocols may be detrimental as well. For example, when doctors administer antipyretics (fever reducers, such as aspirin) to control the rising temperature in measles patients, greater problems are likely. In one study during a measles epidemic in Ghana, Africa, children were divided into two groups. One group received antipyretics — typical at many hospitals. Mortality was five times greater than in the group that did not receive this treatment (Figure 2).(24) Researchers concluded that “children with the most violent, highly febrile form of the disease actually had the best prognosis.”(25)

    In another study conducted in Afghanistan, 200 children with measles were divided into two groups. Once again, members of one group received aspirin to lower fever. The study revealed that children receiving the antipyretics had prolonged illness, more diarrhea, ear infections and respiratory ailments, such as pneumonia, bronchitis and laryngitis, and significantly greater mortality rates.(26) According to Dr. Harold Buttram, who studied the data, “it could be inferred that interference with the natural course of the disease significantly dampened the immune responses of the children.”(27) The authors of the study noted that the “adverse effect of antipyretics, which makes the course of the disease longer, facilitates superinfections which give rise to high mortality.”(28) This study also suggests that “children suffering from measles should be kept warm enough in order to have fever and pass the disease safely.”(29)

    Dr. Robert Mendelsohn agrees that fevers should not be suppressed: “Doctors do a great disservice to you and your child when they prescribe drugs to reduce his fever… When your child contracts an infection, the fever that accompanies it is a blessing, not a curse… A rising body temperature simply indicates that the process of healing is speeding up. It is something to rejoice over, not to fear.”(30) Other researchers have noted that “the development of cancer may quite possibly have been given a boost in certain cases through the repression of febrile conditions.”(31) In fact, pyrexia (a condition resulting from fever inducers) has been used in the prevention and treatment of carcinomas.(32) Despite the evidence implicating antipyretics in prolonging disease and raising mortality rates, Dr. Scheibner ruefully observes that “the relentless suppression of fever in children with measles is still widely practiced.”(33)

    Does a measles vaccine exist?
    In 1758, Francis Home conducted the first experiments to prevent measles by inserting measles-infected blood into deliberate cuts made on healthy people.(34) He claimed that his “variolation” technique caused a milder form of the disease. However, the procedure was not without danger; variolation was known to spread syphilis, tuberculosis, and several other diseases.(35)

    In 1940, the U.S. military tested an experimental measles vaccine on enlisted personnel. Following severe reactions, the program was ended.(36) In 1954, a team of virologists headed by John F. Enders, an American scientist, found a way to separate the measles virus from other substances and grow it in living cells.(37) In 1960, Enders’ vaccine was tested, and in 1963 both a live-virus shot and an inactivated vaccine were licensed. By the mid-1960s, several measles vaccines were available and being administered to millions of young children in the U.S. However, in 1967 the inactivated vaccine was removed from the market because it did not provide long-term immunity and was causing “atypical” measles.(38) By the early 1970s, Canada and other countries had begun nationwide measles vaccination campaigns.(39,40)

    How safe is the measles vaccine?
    The measles vaccine has a long history of causing serious adverse reactions. The pharmaceutical company responsible for producing the measles vaccine publishes an extensive list of ailments known to have occurred following the shot. Severe afflictions affecting nearly every body system — blood, lymphatic, digestive, cardiovascular, immune, nervous, respiratory, and sensory — have been linked to this “preventive” inoculation. These include: encephalitis, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, febrile and afebrile convulsions, seizures, ataxia, ocular palsies, anaphylaxis, angioneurotic edema, bronchial spasms, panniculitis, vasculitis, atypical measles, thrombocytopenia, lymphadenopathy, leukocytosis, pneumonitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme, urticaria, deafness, otitis media, retinitis, optic neuritis, rash, fever, dizziness, headache, and death (Figure 3).(41)

    The manufacturer also warns that the measles vaccine “has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential” and “it is…not known whether [it] can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproductive capacity.” Thus, “it would be prudent to assume that the vaccine strain of virus is…capable of inducing adverse fetal effects.” Also, “caution should be exercised when…administered to a nursing woman.”(42)

    The most up-to-date information
    on the measles (and MMR) vaccine
    may be found in the book:
    Vaccine Safety Manual

  34. #64 by Anonymous on January 12, 2015 - 3:27 pm

    Vaccines have saved millions of lives. You obviously have not been around that long.

    • #65 by Joe Imbriano on January 12, 2015 - 11:33 pm

      That is a lie. Ending the radiation biology programs of the last century, sanitation, water treatment, hygiene, nutrition and common sense have saved millions of lives.You need to understand pathology, and most importantly the terrain. The terrain is everything-Pasteur on his deathbed. By the way, have you ever read the book by Morris Beale?

      What do you get when you take a 150 IQ student, sleep deprive them, bring them to the verge of insanity at a very young age, mentally break, indoctrinate them and sew their head back up nice and tight?

      I will tell you. You will get a quarter million a year drug dealer and the third most dangerous man or woman on the streets. Medical errors leading to patient death higher than a kite. Doctors kill more people every year than car crashes and guns. They kill as many as 400,000 people a year. Now they are priming the pump for forced vaccinations because people like to eat crap and take pills instead of eating nutritious food and taking care of themselves. Vaccines are part of a eugenics program whereby metallic nano particles and piezo electric compounds are injected into every last man woman and child in this country. These compounds are engineered to react with the wireless frequencies in wide use today. Wireless triggered gene activation patents exist.

    • #66 by anonymous on January 13, 2015 - 7:29 am

      Stop spreading ignorance.

  35. #67 by Wise up! on January 28, 2015 - 7:17 pm

    Why All the Anger?

    by Dr. Jack Wolfson
    Special to Health Impact News

    I recently did an interview which was aired on NBC Phoenix. I was asked my opinion on vaccinations in response to the current measles outbreaks that have occurred at Disneyland in California. My reply has generated quite a bit of anger in thousands of people.

    There has also been a tremendous amount of support to my comments and opinions. In short, The Society Against Injecting Our Kids With Chemicals (TSAIOKWC for short) has a lot of followers.

    I want to address all this misguided anger and see if we can re-direct it where it belongs.

    Be angry at food companies. Sugar cereals, donuts, cookies, and cupcakes lead to millions of deaths per year. At its worst, chicken pox killed 100 people per year. If those chicken pox people didn’t eat cereal and donuts, they may still be alive. Call up Nabisco and Kellogg’s and complain. Protest their products. Send THEM hate-mail.
    Be angry at fast food restaurants. Tortured meat burgers, pesticide fries, and hormone milkshakes are the problem. The problem is not Hepatitis B which is a virus contracted by drug users and those who sleep with prostitutes. And you want to inject that vaccine into your newborn?
    Be angry at the companies who make your toxic laundry detergent, fabric softener, and dryer sheets. You and your children are wearing and breathing known carcinogens (they cause cancer). Call Bounce and Downy and let them know. These products kill more people than mumps, a virus which actually doesn’t cause anyone to die. Same with hepatitis A, a watery diarrhea.
    Be angry at all the companies spewing pollution into our environment. These chemicals and heavy metals are known to cause autism, heart disease, cancer, autoimmune disease and every other health problem. Worldwide, these lead to 10’s of millions of deaths every year. Measles deaths are a tiny fraction compared to pollution.
    Be angry at your parents for not breastfeeding you, co-sleeping with you, and stuffing your face with Domino’s so they can buy more Tide and finish the laundry. Breastfeeding protects your children from many infectious diseases.
    Be angry with your doctor for being close-minded and not disclosing the ingredients in vaccines (not that they read the package insert anyway). They should tell you about the aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, aborted fetal tissue, animal proteins, polysorbate 80, antibiotics, and other chemicals in the shots. According to the Environmental Working Group, newborns contain over 200 chemicals as detected by cord blood. Maybe your doctor feels a few more chemicals injected into your child won’t be a big deal.
    Be angry with the cable companies and TV manufacturers for making you and your children fat and lazy, not wanting to exercise or play outside. Lack of exercise kills millions more than polio. Where are all those 80 year olds crippled by polio? I can’t seem to find many.
    In fact, be angry with Steve Jobs and Bill Gates for creating computers so you can sit around all day blasted with electromagnetic radiation reading posts like this.
    Be angry with pharmaceutical companies for allowing us to believe living the above life can be treated with drugs. Correctly prescribed drugs kill thousands of people per year. The flu kills just about no one. The vaccine never works.
    Finally, be angry with yourself for not opening your eyes to the snow job and brainwashing which have taken over your mind. You NEVER asked the doctor any questions. You NEVER asked what is in the vaccines. You NEVER learned about these benign infections.

    Let’s face it, you don’t really give a crap what your children eat. You don’t care about chemicals in their life. You don’t care if they sit around all day watching the TV or playing video games.

    All you care about is drinking your Starbuck’s, your next plastic surgery, your next cocktail, your next affair, and your next sugar fix!

    This post was created with love and with the idea of creating a better world for our children and future generations. Anger increases your risk of suffering a heart attack. Be careful.

    About the Author

    Dr. Jack Wolfson is a board certified cardiologist in Phoenix. He is known as The Paleo Cardiologist and The Natural Cardiologist. Check out his website TheDrsWolfson.com and follow him on Facebook at The Drs. Wolfson.

  36. #68 by Vaccines can kill and injure on February 4, 2015 - 8:43 pm

    Exclusive: Lee Hieb, M.D., shares ‘dirty little secret’ immunization pushers don’t reveal
    Published: 4 hours ago
    image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/11/Lee-Hieb-M.D._avatar-96×96.jpg

    author-image LEE HIEB, M.D. About | Email | Archive
    image: http://www.wnd.com/wp-content/themes/worldnet-theme/_/images//feed.png

    rss feed Subscribe to feed

    image: http://www.wnd.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-print/images/print.png

    Printer Friendly
    Text smaller
    Text bigger
    Gov. Chris Christie has been vilified for making a very simple statement – that parents (and presumably patients themselves) should have the freedom to choose whether to vaccinate their children. I have been asked for years what I thought about vaccination, so let me lay out the issues.

    Before getting into the science, lets discuss the philosophy:

    1. The voices shrieking to forcibly vaccinate people are the same voices shrieking to support a woman’s right to choose abortion under Roe v. Wade. If a woman’s body is sacrosanct, if she has the right to choose to deliver a child or not, if she has total authority over her body, how can she not have the right to accept or refuse a vaccination?

    2. Medical ethics are clear: No one should be forced to undergo a medical treatment without informed consent and without their agreement to the treatment. We condemn the forced sterilization of the ’20s and ’30s, the Tuskegee medical experiments infecting black inmates and the Nazi medicine that included involuntary “Euthanasia,” experimentation and sterilization. How can we force vaccination without consent? Vaccination is a medical treatment with risks including death. It is totally antithetical to all ethics in medicine to mandate that risk to others.

    3. Science is never “concluded.” Mr. Obama and other ideologues may think the truth is finalized (“The science is indisputable”), but the reality is our understanding of disease and treatment are constantly being updated. Just like Newton’s mechanical paradigm of the universe was supplanted by Einsteinian physics, and physicists today modify that view, medical “truth” is not the truth for long. In an attempt to quantify change in medicine, years ago a cardiology journal discussed “The Half-life of Truth.” cardiologists looked back in their journal at 20-year-old articles to see how much of what was believed then was still believed to be true. The answer? 50 percent. So in cardiology, at least – and in all of medicine to greater or lesser degree – only half of what we believe now will still be true in 20 or so years. The last word on vaccination is not in. It hasn’t even begun to be written.

    4. If you believe absolutely in the benefit and protective value of vaccination, why does it matter what others do? Or don’t do? If you believe you need vaccination to be healthy and protected, then by all means vaccinate your child and yourself. Why should you even be concerned what your neighbor chooses to do for his child – if vaccination works? The idea of herd immunity is still based on the idea that in individual cases vaccines actually are protective.

    5. If you think the government has the right to forcibly vaccinate people – for the good of society – what is to prevent them from forcibly sterilizing people, or forcibly euthanizing people, or forcibly implanting a tracking device – for the good of society? You make think those examples are extreme (although two-thirds have happened), but the principle is the same. You are allowing government to have ultimate authority over your body.

    Here’s the help you’ll need to prepare your household for the realities of living under a government-dictated health-care system — order Dr. Hieb’s “Surviving the Medical Meltdown: Your Guide to Living Through the Disaster of Obamacare”

    So, I’ve been asked, “Why not vaccinate your children? Why not take the influenza vaccine?” Well, I believe the choice is up to you. I’ve covered my thinking about the influenza vaccine in an article in the Journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, available online, but here are some facts about childhood vaccines that make me think twice about their use. I traced these points back to the source, so these are not blindly reprinted from hearsay Internet articles. In some cases I found public references to be wrong but the data to be correct when I got to the source. Much of this comes from government reporting. Anyone can research disease incidence by reading MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) from the CDC and accessing the search engine for VAERS (Vaccine complication reporting site) at http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php.

    1. Since 2005 (and even before that), there have been no deaths in the U.S. from measles, but there have been 86 deaths from MMR vaccine – 68 of them in children under 3 years old. And there were nearly 2,000 disabled.

    2. In countries which that BCG vaccinations against tuberculosis, the incidence of Type I diabetes in children under 14 is nearly double. (“Infectious Disease in Clinical Practice” no. 6 pages 449-454, 1997)

    3. As reported in Lancet in 1995, inflammatory bowel disease (i.e. Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis) is 13 times more prevalent in persons vaccinated for measles.

    4. In a nested case-control study within the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) in the United Kingdom, patients who had a first MS (Multiple Sclerosis) diagnosis recorded were compared with controls. The authors concluded that immunization with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine is associated with a threefold increased risk of developing MS (Hernan et al., 2004). No increased risk of MS was associated with other vaccines, which included tetanus and influenza vaccinations.

    5. In 1982 William Torch, a prolific researcher and publisher on Neurologic topics, presented a paper (later published) at the American Academy of Neurology reviewing SIDS deaths. He reported that in 100 consecutive cases, 70 percent of SIDS deaths occurred within three weeks of pertussis vaccination. In very convincing confirmation, a Japanese prefecture stopped vaccinating after associating SIDS with the pertussis vaccine. It is worth reading the entire description from Viera Scheibner, PhD:

    In 1975, about 37 Crib Sudden Deaths were linked to vaccination in Japan. Doctors in one prefecture boycotted vaccinations, and refused to vaccinate. The Japanese government paid attention and stopped vaccinating children below the age of 2 years. When immunization was delayed until a child was 24 months of age, Sudden Infant Death cases and claims for vaccine related deaths disappeared. Japan zoomed from a high 17th place in infant mortality rate to the lowest infant mortality rate in the world when they stopped vaccinating. Japan didn’t vaccinate any children below the age of 2 years between 1975 and 1988, for 13 years. But then in 1988, Japanese parents were given the choice to start vaccinating anywhere between 3 months and 48 months. The Ministry study group studied 2,720 SIDS cases occurring between 1980 and 1992 and they established that their very low SIDS rate quadrupled.

    6. A mail survey was done of 635 children in the Netherlands in 2004. German measles and whooping cough (pertussis) were twice as common in unvaccinated children. However, throat inflammations, ear infections, rheumatologic complaints, seizures and febrile convulsions were much more common in the vaccinated group. Aggressive behavioral episodes were eight times more frequent in vaccinated children, and sleep disordered more often. Tonsils were removed in 33 percent of children who had been vaccinated vs. 7.3 percent unvaccinated.

    7. In 1947, the first reports of brain inflammation and chronic brain damage, including death, after pertussis vaccination began to be published (Brody, 1947; Byers and Moll, 1948, Low, 1955, Berg, 1958; Strom, 1960, 1967; Dick, 1967, 1974; Kuhlenkampff, 1974; Stewart, 1977, 1979). But it took more than 40 years of collective evidence before academic medicine decided it was true –1981 National Childhood Encephalopathy Study (NCES) and in 1991 and 1994 by the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences.

    In 1991, after reviewing vaccine safety, the Institute of Medicine admitted, “In the course of its review, the committee encountered many gaps and limitations in knowledge bearing directly or indirectly on the safety of vaccines. These include inadequate understanding of the biologic mechanisms underlying adverse events following natural infection or immunization, insufficient or inconsistent information from case reports and case series, inadequate size or length of followup of many population based epidemiologic studies [and] few experimental studies published in relation to the number of epidemiologic studies published.”

    So the next question is: Does vaccination work? Does it really protect you against disease? The answer is variable. Smallpox vaccine seems to be nearly universally protective against the very fatal disease of smallpox, and use of vaccine led to the eradication of the disease in the wild. But the dirty little secret in recent outbreaks of mumps, measles and pertussis is – they are occurring in vaccinated people in highly vaccinated populations!

    In 2006 an epidemic of mumps broke out in my state of Iowa. Ultimately, 11 states reported 2,597 cases of mumps. The majority of mumps cases (1,487) were reported from Iowa. As reported in “Mumps Epidemic – Iowa, 2006,” “Despite control efforts and a highly vaccinated population, this epidemic has spread across Iowa and potentially to neighboring states.” According to the CDC, “During the prevaccine era, nearly everyone in the United States experienced mumps, and 90 percent of cases occurred among children aged 97 percent of children entering school in Iowa had received two doses of MMR vaccine. ” Of note, this outbreak mostly occurred in young adults of college age who had received the vaccine. Only 6 percent of those affected were known to be unvaccinated, 12 percent received one dose of MMR vaccine, 51 percent had two doses of MMR vaccine, and 31 percent (mostly adults) were not sure of their immunization history.

    In 2008-2009, Australia had epidemics of whooping cough and measles. Health authorities there must reveal the vaccination status of children in epidemics. Eighty-four percent of Australian children who got whooping cough were fully vaccinated, and 78 percent who got measles had record of measles vaccination.

    In the 2010 outbreak of whooping cough in California, well over half the victims were fully vaccinated.

    Whooping cough continuously declined in the U.S. from over 100,000 cases in 1922 to around 1978 when 2,063 cases were reported. That year, pertussis vaccine became mandated for school attendance. Beginning around 1995, when the U.S. had 5,137 cases, the incidence has increased, to 2012 when over 48,000 cases were reported, including 20 deaths. The majority of deaths were in newborns under three months of age. Why is this happening? It is not because people are not becoming vaccinated. The CDC says more than 84 percent of children under 3 years old have been vaccinated with four doses of pertussis vaccine. But the current vaccine does not include all strains of pertussis. And the most vulnerable to the disease – the small infants – are not able to take the vaccine. Since older children and adults are much less likely to die of whooping cough, the question that must be asked is this: Is vaccination effective in producing antibody transfer from mother to infant? Or is it better to allow the natural disease to occur?

    Finally, it turns out that death and disability from many childhood diseases is preventable by means other than vaccination. Vitamin A has been known since the 1930s to reduce mortality from measles by 60 percent. Vitamin D is protective against viral illness. And numerous authors and studies have shown the damaging effects of chemical antipyretics (fever lowering drugs) on the natural course of disease – a practice still sadly in widespread use in America. Better understanding of disease mechanisms, utilizing nutritional support and better scientific care of the sick child are safer alternatives to widespread vaccination.

    Perhaps one of the best perspectives on the whole vaccination paradigm is provided by Dr. Harold Buttram, M.D., FAACP:

    As one of today’s senior citizens who grew up in a Midwestern state in the 1930s, and as a doctor who has treated many children, I may have a special vantage point of time and experience in regard to the changes that have taken place in the health of America’s children since the relatively innocent times of the 1930s. At summer camps in the New Mexico Mountains that I was fortunate to attend, no boy had allergies, none was on medication, and no boy was ever sick with the common ailments of today. It was much the same in schools. I don’t recall ever seeing a child with easily recognized behaviors now described as hyperactivity (ADHD) or autism.

    Today in stark contrast, approximately one-third of our youngsters are afflicted with the 4-A Disorders (Autism, ADHD, Asthma, and Allergies), as described and documented by Dr. Kenneth Bock. School budgets are being strained to the breaking points in providing special education classes for autistic and learning disabled children. Allergy problems are proliferating, as indicated by long lines of children at school nursing stations for their noontime medications.

    Could today’s infant and childhood vaccine programs, with their steadily increasing numbers of vaccines, be a contributory cause of this ominous health trend? As reflected in the U.S. Congressional Hearings (1999 to December 2004) on issues of vaccine safety, in which major deficiencies in vaccine safety testing were disclosed, it is a real possibility that vaccines may be one of the major, if not the major cause of this trend.

    I, too, am old enough to remember these times. We are changing the pattern of disease, but not necessarily making our children nor ourselves healthier. We are converting benign childhood disease into more severe adult disease. Consider the chickenpox vaccine. We used to have chickenpox parties where small children were purposely exposed to kids sick with chickenpox. In those days, every mother or grandmother knew it was safer for toddlers to get the disease early and not wait until teenage years. Now we vaccinate, but of course that vaccine is only effective for 15-20 years, so now adults must constantly be revaccinated or run the risk of getting a life-threatening severe form of chickenpox. The shingles uptick is directly attributable to the lack of re-exposure of older people to the wild chickpox virus. But not to worry – the drug companies can sell us a shingles vaccine for a disease their previous vaccine created.

    We have forgotten that for most normal children, childhood diseases are benign. As recounted about mumps in the Iowa Department of Public Health Manual, “it is more common in infants, children and young adults. Of people who are not immunized, >85 percent will have mumps by adulthood, but symptoms may have been mild and therefore not recognized.”

    At the end of the day, the issue here is one of freedom, and freedom is the freedom to choose – even if we make a bad choice. The argument that I must vaccinate my children for the good of the community is not only scientifically questionable, it is an unethical precept. It is the argument all dictators and totalitarians have used. “Comrade, you must work tirelessly for the good of the collective. You must give up your money and property for the good of the collective, and now … you must allow us to inject your children with what we deem is good for the collective.” If American’s don’t stand up against this, then we are lost. Because we have lost ownership of ourselves. Our bodies are no longer solely ours – we and our children are able to be commandeered for the “greater good.”

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/how-vaccine-hysteria-could-spark-totalitarian-nightmare/#w6JFvsIovigBJlOp.99

  37. #69 by Joe Imbriano on February 5, 2015 - 5:50 am

    Studies Show that Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease
    Mon Feb 2, 2015 2:34pm EST
    * Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.

    Washington, D.C., Feb. 2, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Health officials are blaming unvaccinated children for the recent measles outbreak that started at Disneyland. However, with no blood tests proving the outbreak is from wild measles, the most likely source of the outbreak is a recently vaccinated individual, according to published science.

    Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.1,2 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

    Furthermore, vaccine recipients can carry diseases in the back of their throat and infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease.11,12,13

    “Numerous scientific studies indicate that children who receive a live virus vaccination can shed the disease and infect others for weeks or even months afterwards. Thus, parents who vaccinate their children can indeed put others at risk,” explains Leslie Manookian, documentary filmmaker and activist. Manookian’s award winning documentary, The Greater Good, aims to open a dialog about vaccine safety.

    Both unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals are at risk from exposure to those recently vaccinated. Vaccine failure is widespread; vaccine-induced immunity is not permanent and recent outbreaks of diseases such as whooping cough, mumps and measles have occurred in fully vaccinated populations.14,15 Flu vaccine recipients become more susceptible to future infection after repeated vaccination.16

    “Health officials should require a two-week quarantine of all children and adults who receive vaccinations,” says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. “This is the minimum amount of time required to prevent transmission of infectious diseases to the rest of the population, including individuals who have been previously vaccinated.”

    “Vaccine failure and failure to acknowledge that live virus vaccines can spread disease have resulted in an increase in outbreaks of infectious disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals,” says Manookian, “CDC should instruct physicians who administer vaccinations to inform their patients about the risks posed to others by those who’ve been recently vaccinated.”

    According to the Weston A. Price Foundation, the best protection against infectious disease is a healthy immune system, supported by adequate vitamin A and vitamin C. Well-nourished children easily recover from infectious disease and rarely suffer complications.

    The number of measles deaths declined from 7575 in 1920 (10,000 per year in many years in the 1910s) to an average of 432 each year from 1958-1962.17 The vaccine was introduced in 1963. Between 2005 and 2014, there have been no deaths from measles in the U.S. and 108 deaths from the MMR vaccine.18

    The Weston A. Price Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nutrition education foundation with the mission of disseminating accurate, science-based information on diet and health. Named after nutrition pioneer Weston A. Price, DDS, author of Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, the Washington, DC-based Foundation publishes a quarterly journal for its 15,000 members, supports 600 local chapters worldwide and hosts a yearly international conference. The Foundation phone number is (202) 363-4394, http://www.westonaprice.org, info@westonaprice.org.


    1. Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011 http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/27/cid.ciu105

    2. Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Urine Specimens from Vaccine Recipients http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7494055

    3. Comparison of the Safety, Vaccine Virus Shedding and Immunogenicity of Influenza Virus Vaccine, Trivalent, Types A and B, Live Cold-Adapted, Administered to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected and Non-HIV Infected Adultshttp://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/181/2/725.full

    4. Sibling Transmission of Vaccine-Derived Rotavirus (RotaTeq) Associated with Rotavirus Gastroenteritishttp://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/2/e438

    5. Polio vaccination may continue after wild virus fades http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2008/10/polio-vaccination-may-continue-after-wild-virus-fades

    6. Engineering attenuated virus vaccines by controlling replication fidelity http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v14/n2/abs/nm1726.html

    7. CASE OF VACCINE-ASSOCIATED MEASLES FIVE WEEKS POST-IMMUNISATION, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA, OCTOBER 2013http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20649

    8. The Safety Profile of Varicella Vaccine: A 10-Year Review http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/197/Supplement_2/S165.full

    9. Comparison of Shedding Characteristics of Seasonal Influenza Virus (Sub)Types and Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09; Germany, 2007-2011 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051653

    10. Epigenetics of Host-Pathogen Interactions: The Road Ahead and the Road Behind http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1003007

    11. Animal Models for Influenza Virus Pathogenesis and Transmission http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063653/

    12. Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate mode http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063653/

    13. Study Finds Parents Can Pass Whooping Cough to Babies http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/health/03coug.html?_r=0

    14. Immunized People Getting Whooping Cough http://www.kpbs.org/news/2014/jun/12/immunized-people-getting-whooping-cough/

    15. Vaccine Failure — Over 1000 Got Mumps in NY in Last Six Months http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/03/06/vaccine-failure–over-1000-get-mumps-in-ny-in-last-six-months.aspx

    16. Impact of Repeated Vaccination on Vaccine Effectiveness Against Influenza A(H3N2) and B During 8 Seasons http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/09/29/cid.ciu680.full

    17. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056803.htm

    18. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056803.htm

    CONTACT: Kim Hartke, 703-860-2711, press@westonaprice.org

    Leslie Manookian, 208-721-2135, leslie@greatergoodmovie.org

  38. #70 by Petition on February 5, 2015 - 11:01 am


    Please sign this petition:


  39. #71 by Disney measles???? on February 6, 2015 - 5:22 am

    “There are 24 different measles genotypes or strains. The CDC finally did molecular characterization to determine the genotype implicated in the Disney outbreak, labeled “B3.”
    MMR only targets “A.”
    MMR is utterly USELESS and does absolutely NOTHING for the 23 other strains.
    This REFUTES the following:
    1. Unvaccinated children are spreading measles
    2. Everyone needs to be vaccinated
    3. The measles vaccine protects against measles
    We need a vaccine against stupidity.”


    • #72 by Anonymous on February 6, 2015 - 1:01 pm

      You anti-vaxers are all the same all full of shit. You don’t know what you are talking about. We have a major epidemic on our hands and you are deliberately spreading misinformation.

      • #73 by stupid about vaccines? on February 6, 2015 - 8:50 pm

        Well, that is an intelligent comment.

  40. #74 by Vaccine injured and dead on February 6, 2015 - 11:03 am

    “Listen to a mom talk about her vaccine injured son. Breaking news from this week.
    “1 in a million” vaccine injury became “1 in 68″ autism. Imagine that.”

    Take a look at the vaccine injured:
    THIS IS BRAND NEW NEWS REPORT! 2/3/15 (2015!) Mom shares her story in midst of measles/vaccine debate. Doctors told her it was one in a million chance this happened yet she was COMPENSATED by courts for vaccine injury and he was diagnosed w #autism… but many other experts say way more frequent. Thoughts? #cdcwhistleblower #hearthiswell PLEASE learn more w my vaccine injury story at my website too. http://HealthNutNews.com/join (I sell nothing)

  41. #75 by Anonymous on February 6, 2015 - 1:15 pm

    Claim: The study of vaccines, their historical record of achievements, effectiveness, safety and mechanism in humans are well understood and proven in scientific and medical circles.

    Fact: The claim is completely false.
    1. What to ask: Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
    2. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
    3. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence which can prove that disease reduction in any part of the world, at any point in history was attributable to inoculation of populations?
    4. What to ask: Could you please explain how the safety and mechanism of vaccines in the human body are scientifically proven if their pharmacokinetics (the study of bodily absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of ingredients) are never examined or analyzed in any vaccine study?
    One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential of any vaccine are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies and health agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis or evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.
    There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the history of vaccine development that has ever proven their safety, effectiveness or achievements (unless those achievements have underlined their damage to human health).
    There are also no controlled studies completed in any country which have objectively proven that vaccines have had any direct or consequential effect on the reduction of any type of disease in any part of the world.
    Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety and effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility impairments, but they won’t address those.
    Claim: Preservatives and chemical additives used in the manufacture of vaccines are safe and no studies have been linked or proven them unsafe for use in humans.
    Fact: The claim is completely false.
    5. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health and prevents disease?
    6. What to ask: Can you provide a risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human health for the intended goal of preventing disease?
    This issue is no longer even open to debate. It is a scientifically established fact in literally hundreds of studies that the preservatives and chemical additives in vaccines damage cells. Neurotoxicity, immune suppression, immune-mediated chronic inflammation and carcinogenic proliferation are just a few of several effects that have been observed on the human body. See a list of chemicals in vaccines
    Fortunately, the drug companies still tell us the damage vaccines have on the human body. People just don’t read them. All you have to do is look at the insert for any vaccine, and it will detail the exact ingredients, alerts and potentially lethal effects.
    See my latest analysis of the Arepanrix H1N1 vaccine for an example.
    Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject any type of neurotoxin into any person to prevent any disease is completely misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of any logic regarding human health.
    Claim: Once an individual is injected with the foreign antigen in the vaccine, that individual becomes immune to future infections.
    Fact: The claim is completely false.
    7. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on how bypassing the respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream enhances immune functioning and prevents future infections?
    8. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on how a vaccine would prevent viruses from mutating?
    9. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as to how a vaccination can target a virus in an infected individual who does not have the exact viral configuration or strain the vaccine was developed for?
    All promoters of vaccination fail to realize that the respiratory tract of humans (actually all mammals) contains antibodies which initiates natural immune responses within the respiratory tract mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream leads to a corruption in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses or bacteria cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which continue to assault the immune system.
    Despite the injection of any type of vaccine, viruses continue circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other organisms. The ability of a vaccine manufacturer to target the exact viral strain without knowing its mutagenic properties is equivalent to shooting a gun at a fixed target that has already been moved from its location. You would be shooting at what was, not what is!
    Flu viruses, may mutate, change or adapt several times over a period of one flu season, making the seasonal influenza vaccine 100% redundant and ineffective every single flu season. Ironically, the natural immune defenses of the human body can target these changes but the vaccines cannot.
    I have never encountered one pro-vaccine advocate, whether medically or scientifically qualified, who could answer even 1 let alone all 9 of these questions. One or all of the following will happen when debating any of the above questions:
    – They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
    – They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to the question.
    – They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again. Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions in an open mainstream venue.

(will not be published)

Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!