FJUHSD and FSD School Boards Ignore Warnings Re Classroom Microwave Radiation
All wireless devices/routers emit microwave radiation. Classroom exposure levels are at levels trillions of times higher than we were exposed to as children.
Wired technology is more secure, fast, and does not emit radiation.
Why isn’t wired technology being used in Fullerton schools?
Wi-Fi and iPads in schools is “a tragedy in the making.”
Dr. George Carlo, Ph.D, M.S., J.D, is a public health scientist, epidemiologist, lawyer, and the founder of the Science and Public Policy Institute. Dr. Carlo headed the $28.5 million research program funded by the cell phone industry from 1993 to 1999.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgLO9yR1JlQ
“ . . . our wireless classrooms . . . are totally safe for our kids.”
Robert Pletka, Ed. D., FSD Superintendent
Wireless RF-Radiation “should be regarded as carcinogenic (cancer causing). Current guidelines for exposure should be urgently revised.”
Dr. Lennart Hardell, Professor of Oncology, MD, PhD, was the head of The Hardell-group which conducted case control studies on brain tumours including assessment of use of mobile phones and cordless phones. Based on the Hill criteria, glioma and acoustic neuroma should be considered to be caused by RF‐ EMF emissions from wireless phones and regarded as carcinogenic to humans, classifying it as group 1 according to the IARC classification.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928468014000649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2014.10.001
“My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7” (about iPad use)
Hilda Sugarman, Fullerton School District Trustee
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/school-601588-technology-ipad.html
“We need to address the emerging public health crisis related to cell phones, wireless devices, wireless utility meters and wireless infrastructure in our schools and neighborhoods.”
200+ Scientists Appeal to the U.N. and World Health Organization
The 200+ scientists have collectively published over 2,000 peer-reviewed papers on non-ionizing radiation.
“ . . . our wireless classrooms . . . are totally safe for our kids.”
Robert Pletka, Ed. D., FSD Superintendent
“Frey’s microwave exposure experiments findings varied from causing rats to become docile, altered specific behaviors of rats, altered heart rates, and caused frogs’ hearts to stop beating with microwave radiation at levels 10,000 times less than a cell phone.”
Alan Frey, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine. For decades Frey, funded by the Office of Naval Research and the U.S. Army, was the most active researcher on the bioeffects of microwave radiation in the country. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=594
‘Promoting the use of technology in classrooms is the most important element of the student WiFi.’
Sonje Berg, Assistant Principal, Troy High School –
http://www.troyhigh.com/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=240975&type=d&pREC_ID=557000
-“A look at the new student Wi-Fi on campus (!!) Priscilla Cheney Love! This is a beautiful issue!”
https://www.facebook.com/oracle.troy?fref=ts
“Dr. Salford . . . found that the wireless radiation damaged the blood brain barrier at much lower levels than cell phones emissions. A single 2-hour exposure . . . was shown to damage or destroy up to 2% of an animal’s brain cells, resulting in memory impairment, genetic damage, and other biological effects.”
Dr. Leif Salford, MD, PhD neurosurgeon at Lund University Hospital, and professor and Chairman of the Department of Neurosurgery.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241519/pdf/ehp0111-000881.pdf
“ . . . our wireless classrooms . . . are totally safe for our kids.”
Robert Pletka, Ed. D., FSD Superintendent
“The FCC’s exposure guidelines did not consider information that addresses non-thermal prolonged exposures, i.e. chronic/prolonged, low-level (non-thermal) exposures. The FCC exposure guidelines are considered protective of effects rising from a thermal mechanism but not all possible mechanisms. Therefore, the generalization by many that the guidelines protect human beings from harm by any and all mechanisms is not justified.”
Norbert Hankin, Senior Scientist, Radiation Protection Division, United States EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-epa-tells-it-like-it-is-will-the-fsd/
“We and our kids are safe.”
Dr. Roman Schulze, Fullerton D.O. response when confronted with the fact that the FCC exposure guidelines are 100,000,000 X higher than the Austrian Medical Association recommends.
“Currently there are no national or international “standards” for safety levels of radiofrequency devices. Therefore, for anyone to claim that they meet FCC “standards” gives a false impression of safety certainty . . . “ FCC guidelines only deal with thermal effects, i.e. heat damage. It says nothing about safety from the risk of many chronic diseases that the public is most concerned about such as cancer, miscarriage, birth defects, semen quality, auto immune diseases, etc. The FCC guidelines are irrelevant and cannot be used for any claims of safetyunless we are addressing heat damage. The bottom line is that the safety level for RF exposure related to non-thermal effects is unknown at present (2011) and whoever claims that their device is safe regarding non-thermal effects is either ignorant or misleading.”
D-Kun Lai, MD, PhD, MPH, Senior Research Scientist, Kaiser Permanente, Division of Research
https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-epa-tells-it-like-it-is-will-the-fsd/
“We and our kids are safe.”
Dr. Roman Schulze, Fullerton D.O. response when confronted with the fact that the FCC exposure guidelines are 100,000,000 X higher than the Austrian Medical Association recommends.
FJUHSD trustees REFUSED to meet with the following worldwide experts in microwave radiation health/legal matters:
Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Sweden, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, whose peer reviewed science demonstrates RF-radiation is carcinogenic
Ms. Dabna Tachover, Israel, an attorney with the lawsuit to ban WiFi in Israeli schools
Magda Havas, Ph.D., Canada, an associate professor of Environmental & Resource Studies at Trent University with extensive background in EMF and health, particularly the school environment
Meeting flatly refused by FJUHSD trustees: President Barbara Kilponen, Robert Singer, Robert Hathaway, Marilyn Buchi, Andy Montoya
“ . . . it will not be possible to set up a meeting” with the FJUHSD trustees.
Ken Stichter, Ed.D., FJUHSD Superintendent, April 28, 2015, email correspondence to parent
California Medical Association (CMA)
“. . . thus current standards are inadequate to protect public health . . . “
“RESOLVED; that the CMA understands that existing public safety limits for microwave EMF devices are outdated and inadequate to protect public health . . . “
House of Delegates Resolution Wireless Standards Reevaluation 2014 Resolution 107- 14PASSEDDate Adopted Dec 7, 2014
http://www.parentsforsafetechnology.org/california-medical-association-resolution-on-wireless.html
FJUHSD vote to install wireless in all high schools: President Barbara Kilponen, Robert Singer, Robert Hathaway, Marilyn Buchi, Andy Montoya
“It was the consensus of the Board” to install wireless.
Jennifer Williams, Ed. D, FJUHSD Assistant Superintendent, in email correspondence to parent, dated 9-23-15
“…Right now veterans that served their countries are asking about their grandchildren being mutated and requiring immediate surgeries. We can’t put our children in a microwave but we send them to school where they are put in a man made microwave called a classroom bathed in 2.4 GHz EMFs. These EMFs [are] expanding and collapsing inside bodies, buildings and infrastructure 4.8 billion times per second.Can DNA, tissue, cells or molecules withstand violent oscillations 4.8 billion times per second? …”
Curtis Bennett,
Chief Science Officer,
Interprovincial Journeyman Electrician(Red Seal), Building Engineering Technologist, Adjunct Professor for Accredited Medical Education For CME Credits, Thermal Radiation Consultant for 35 Years, http://www.stayonthetruth.com/non-ionizing-radiation-identical-health-effects.php
FJUHSD strategy to ignore health hazards of microwave radiation, termed as ‘critics’, and move ahead with bringing in wireless to all of the high schools:
“From a strategy point of view, if the (FJUHSD) Board gives the authorization, it is not the intent of the superintendent to make any big announcement or engage in any fanfare regarding the decision to move forward with WiFi plans. This would only fan the fire of critics. Rather, we have a district technology plan and we will move forward in a quiet matter of fact way.”
Provided by Jennifer Williams, Ed. D, FJUHSD Assistant Superintendent, in CA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST to parent.
Wi-Fi and iPads in schools is “f***ing crazy.”
Dr. George Carlo, Ph.D, M.S., J.D, is a public health scientist, epidemiologist, lawyer, and the founder of the Science and Public Policy Institute. Dr. Carlo headed the $28.5 million research program funded by the cell phone industry from 1993 to 1999. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=3&v=1gkcPZV4coQ
“Parent Vivien Moreno stated her support of rapidly introducing and utilizing wireless technology capability throughout the sites.” FJUHSD school board meeting minutes dated 9/21/2015
Vivien Moreno, Fullerton Observer reporter assigned to FJUHSD and parent. Ms. Moreno has been present during most, if not all, of the public comments presenting the cancer science and serious health hazards to our children and teachers from wireless.
http://www.fjuhsd.net/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=2737516
Why are Fullerton school boards bringing in microwave radiation when countries are enacting laws against it and schools are taking actions to remove it????
France 2015 – Law passed to ban Wi-Fi in nursery schools, preschools for age 3 and under; turning off wireless devices when not being used in elementary schools
Israel 2015 – Banned Wi-Fi in Kindergarten
US – Ashland, Massachusetts Public Schools have implemented Wi-Fi Device “Best Practices” which include turning the Wi-Fi off when not in use and keeping devices on a table || Private schools in U.S. are either removing or deciding not to install wireless for health reasons
Actions on wireless around the world:
http://ehtrust.org/cell-phones-radiation-3/international-policy-actions-on-wireless/
Family sues Fay School in Southboro, claims Wi-Fi made son ill
http://www.telegram.com/article/20150824/NEWS/150829606
Parents, grandparents & community: We are Fullerton parents, please contact us so that we may work together to immediately end wireless radiation exposures to students and teachers in Fullerton schools.
Thank you.
THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS ARE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTINUING THE FORCED WIRELESS EXPOSURE IN FULLERTON SCHOOLS. THEY MAY BE FAMILIAR FACES TO ALL OF YOU. THEY MAY BE YOUR NEIGHBORS. LET THEM KNOW HOW YOU FEEL. WE ALREADY HAVE.
Newbies at the helm of the FSD
#1 by Joe Imbriano on September 29, 2015 - 9:23 am
The Fullerton Informer Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:22 AM
To: Chris Thompson , Beverly Berryman , Hilda Sugarman , lynn thornley , janny meyer , “Robert J. Feldhake” , Robert Pletka
Cc: “Shawn E. Abrell, Esq.” , Brad Dacus , The Fullerton Informer
This is a formal demand to immediately turn off all wireless systems and cease the use of all wireless technology in all Fullerton School District facilities pursuant to .CALIFORNIA EDUCATION CODE SECTIONS 32060-32065
“““““““““““““““““““““““
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=32001-33000&file=32060-32066
>>> start of quote
32060.
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that art supplies which contain toxic substances or which are potential human carcinogens pose a significant danger to the health and safety of school children. The Legislature also finds and declares that school children are not sufficiently protected by present health laws in so far as materials which may be seriously harmful are not so labeled and therefore children are not properly warned as to the dangers inherent in the use of those materials.
(b) The Legislature intends by this article to ensure that elementary school children are protected by prohibiting the sale of these toxic substances to schools, school districts, and private schools for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 6, inclusive, and that the toxic substances may be purchased by schools, school districts, and private schools for students in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, only if the materials are properly labeled, as described in Section 32064.
32061. “Art or craft material” means any raw or processed material or manufactured product marketed or being represented by the manufacturer or repackager as being suitable for use in the demonstration or the creation of any work of visual or graphic art of any medium. These media may include, but shall not be limited to, paintings, drawings, prints, sculpture, ceramics, enamels, jewelry, stained glass, plastic sculpture, photographs, and leather and textile goods.
32062.
(a) “Human carcinogen” means any substance listed as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
(b) “Potential human carcinogen” means one of the following:
(1) Any substance which does not meet the definition of human carcinogen, but for which there exists sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals, as determined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
(2) Any chemical shown to be changed by the human body into a human carcinogen.
32063. “Toxic substance causing chronic illness” means any of the following:
(a) Human carcinogens.
(b) Potential human carcinogens.
(c) Any substance included in the list of hazardous substances prepared by the Director of Industrial Relations, pursuant to Section 6382 of the Labor Code, notwithstanding exemptions made for substances on the list which are used in particular forms, circumstances, or concentrations, if the health hazard presented by the substance is not the subject of label statements required by federal law.
32064.
(a) For the 1987-88 academic year and for each academic year thereafter, no art or craft material that is deemed by the State Department of Health Services to contain a toxic substance, as defined by the California Hazardous Substance Act, Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 108100) of Part 3 of Division 104 of the Health and Safety Code, or a toxic substance causing chronic illness, as defined in this article, shall be ordered or purchased by any school, school district, or governing authority of a private school in California for use by students in kindergarten and grades 1 to 6, inclusive.
(b) Commencing June 1, 1987, any substance that is defined in subdivision (a) as a toxic substance causing chronic illness shall not be purchased or ordered by a school, school district, or governing authority of a private school for use by students in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, unless it meets the labeling standards specified in Section 32065.
(c) If the State Department of Health Services finds that, because the chronically toxic, carcinogenic, or radioactive substances contained in an art or craft product cannot be ingested, inhaled, or otherwise absorbed into the body during any reasonably foreseeable use of the product in a way that could pose a potential health risk, the department may exempt the product from these requirements to the extent it determines to be consistent with adequate protection of the public health and safety.
(d) For the purposes of this article, an art or craft material shall be presumed to contain an ingredient that is a toxic substance causing chronic illness if the ingredient, whether an intentional ingredient or an impurity, is 1 percent or more by weight of the mixture or product, or if the State Department of Health Services determines that the toxic or carcinogenic properties of the art or craft material are such that labeling is necessary for the adequate protection of the public health and safety.
32065. Warning labels for substances specified in Section 32064 shall meet all of the following standards:
(a) The warning label shall be affixed in a conspicuous place and shall contain the signal word “WARNING,” to alert users of potential adverse health effects.
(b) The warning label shall contain information on the health-related dangers of the art or craft material.
(1) If the product contains a human carcinogen, the warning shall contain the statement: “CANCER HAZARD! Overexposure may create cancer risk.”
(2) If the product contains a potential human carcinogen, and does not contain a human carcinogen, the warning shall contain the statement: “POSSIBLE CANCER HAZARD! Overexposure might create cancer risk.”
(3) If the product contains a toxic substance causing chronic illness, the warning shall contain, but not be limited to, the following statement or statements where applicable:
(A) May cause sterility or damage to reproductive organs.
(B) May cause birth defects or harm to developing fetus.
(C) May be excreted in human milk causing harm to a nursing infant.
(D) May cause central nervous system depression or injury.
(E) May cause numbness or weakness in the extremities.
(F) Overexposure may cause damage to (specify organ).
(G) Heating above (specify degrees) may cause hazardous decomposition products.
(4) If a product contains more than one chronically toxic substance, or if a single substance can cause more than one chronic health effect, the required statements may be combined into one warning statement.
(c) The warning label shall contain a list of ingredients that are toxic substances causing chronic illness.
(d) The warning label shall contain a statement or statements of safe use and storage instructions, conforming to the following list. The label shall contain, but not be limited to, as many of the following risk statements as are applicable:
(1) Keep out of reach of children.
(2) When using, do not eat, drink, or smoke.
(3) Wash hands after use and before eating, drinking, or smoking.
(4) Keep container tightly closed.
(5) Store in well ventilated area.
(6) Avoid contact with skin.
(7) Wear protective clothing (specify type).
(8) Wear NIOSH certified masks for dust, mists, or fumes.
(9) Wear NIOSH certified respirator with appropriate cartridge for (specify type).
(10) Wear NIOSH certified supplied air respirator.
(11) Use window exhaust fan to remove vapors and assure adequate ventilation (specify explosion proof if necessary).
(12) Use local exhaust hood (specify type).
(13) Do not heat above (specify degrees) without adequate ventilation. (14) Do not use/mix with (specify material).
(e) The warning label shall contain a statement on where to obtain more information, such as, “Call your local poison control center for more health information.”
(f) The warning label, or any other label on the substance, shall contain the name and address of the manufacturer or repackager.
(g) If all of the above information cannot fit on the package label, a package insert shall be required to convey all the necessary information to the consumer. In this event, the label shall contain a statement to refer to the package insert, such as “CAUTION: See package insert before use.” For purposes of this section, “package insert” means a display of written, printed, or graphic matter upon a leaflet or suitable material accompanying the art supply. The language on this insert shall be nontechnical and nonpromotional in tone and content. The requirements set forth in subdivisions (a) to (g), inclusive, shall not be considered to be complied with unless the required words, statements, or other information appear on the outside container or wrapper, or on a package insert that is easily legible through the outside container or wrapper and is painted in a color in contrast with the product or the package containing the product. An art or craft material shall be considered to be in compliance with this section if Article 6 (commencing with Section 108500) of Chapter 4 of Part 3 of Division 104 of the Health and Safety Code requires labeling of the art or craft material, and if the material is in compliance with that article. The manufacturer of any art or craft material sold, distributed, offered for sale, or exposed for sale in this state shall supply upon request to the State Department of Health Services any information required by the department in order to perform its duties under this article.
>>> end of quote
Here is the logical application of CA Education Code
““““““““““““““““““““““““““
California schools and school districts that install and operate wireless devices in elementary school classrooms are not in compliance with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064, if the antennas of these devices are powered on and able to send and receive data wirelessly.
Use of wireless devices, including but not limited to, wireless routers, access points, computers, laptops, netbooks, Chromebooks, printers, tablets, speakers, SmartMeters and any other devices that have their antennas powered on to enable them to send and receive data wirelessly in California elementary schools (K-6) is not compliant with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064. Wired connections via Ethernet or fiber optic cables is the only way to connect these devices to each other or to the internet in a way that is compliant with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064.
If the devices’ antennas for wi-fi, mobile data, blue tooth and GPS are all powered off, the antennas are disabled and cannot send and receive data wirelessly. This is whatCalifornia elementary schools must do to comply with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064. Devices that offer wired connectivity via Ethernet ports or USB-to-Ethernet adapaters can connect to the internet with a wired Ethernet or fiber optic cable and still be compliant with CA Educational Code §§32060-32064, as long as all of the devices’ antennas are powered off and disabled.
In addition, the electronic devices in California schools must be positioned far enough away from students to not expose the students to extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields that are beyond a safe level: magnetic flux densities over 1 milliGauss are a problem. A measurement of ambient magnetic flux density of 7 milligauss (contributed by outside power lines) was high enough to force the closure of a school in Oregon and relocate all of the students.
Measurements of magnetic flux density a few inches from many electronic devices yieldreadings as high as 150 milliGauss. The ELF magnetic flux densities fall off exponentially with increased distance from the device, so usually at 18-24″ from the device, the measurements drop below 1 milligauss. These photos visualize the issue for students: https://www.flickr.com/photos/89743379@N06/sets/72157633310156013.
As the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2001 classified ELF magnetic fields as a possible human carcinogen regarding childhood leukemia, California elementary school classrooms must plan and implement technology use carefully to comply with CA EducationalCode §§32060-32064. Laptops and tablets should be used with external keyboards and pointing devices and all electrical devices placed on stands, tables or desks at least 18-24″ from any student. This means hand-holding computers or tablets or placing them in one’s lap is inappropiate for California elementary school students.
Here is the CA Education code that requires this:
1. To educate their students, schools routinely purchase educational materials, including art supplies and other materials. Charged with an even higher duty than parents to protect children while they are in school, the California Legislature found that art supplies containing “toxic substances” or which are “potential human carcinogens” pose a significant danger to the health and safety of school children. EDC 32060(a).
2. In response, the California Legislature prohibited the sale of these toxic substances to schools, school districts, and private schools for use in kindergarten through sixth grade and may only be used in higher grades if the materials are properly labeled. EDC 32060(b); EDC 32064(a) and (b).
3. The California Legislature defined “art or craft material” as “any raw or processed material or manufactured product marketed or being represented by the manufacturer or repackager as being suitable for use in the demonstration or the creation of any work of visual or graphic art of any medium,” EDC 32061, which include “radioactive substances”, see EDC 32064(c).
4. The California Legislature defined “potential human carcinogen” to mean “any substance . . . for which there exists sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals, as determined by the [World Health Organization’s] International Agency for Research on Cancer”. EDC 32062(b)(1).
5. In May 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified exposure to wireless microwave radiation from any source a Class 2B carcinogen as it found “sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals.” Wireless microwave radiation is also a “toxic substance causing chronic illness”, EDC 32063, as it is a potential human carcinogen.
6. Many wireless devices, defined above, are “manufactured products marketed and being represented by the manufacturer . . . as being suitable for use in the demonstration or creation” of “visual or graphic art” media. Many other devices are manufactured to enable wireless connectivity to assist in the creation of visual or graphic art. It matters not if the art is a drawing or a graph of scientific or financial data. It’s the use of wireless connectivity, for any purpose, that is dangerous because the wireless signals, from any source, is a carcinogen that has many direct health impacts in addition to its carcinogenic properties.
In closing, because the antennas of wireless devices, when powered on, transmit data wirelessly that is both a “toxic substance causing chronic illness” and defined as a “potential human carcinogen”, the use of these devices, with its antennas powered on are in all schools, public and private makes the schools not compliant with §§32060-32064 and these antennas must be powered off immediately. All contracts relating to equipment that require antennas to be powered on for the devices to be operational must be cancelled, as these contracts are null and void as they are not compliant with EDC §§32060-32064.
FYI, the following text from Apple Inc.’s web page (http://www.apple.com/education/ipad/teaching-with-ipad/) says “With iPad and these powerful free apps, students write, analyze data, and present their work in engaging ways. In Pages,students make term papers anything but ordinary with photos, videos, and graphics. For data-rich projects, Numbers helps them express ideas in tables, charts, and graphs that go way beyond a mere spreadsheet. And in Keynote, students create presentations with stunning transitions and effects. Students can shoot and edit their own HD video with iMovie,create a visual journal with iPhoto.”
It is Apple Inc.’s proprietary business decision to require wireless signals in order to connect the iPad to a computer network or the internet. Because Apple Inc. does not provide a software driver to enable the use of a USB-to-Ethernet adapter, the iPad is one of the least-compliant with EDC §§32060-32064 products on the market. Nearly every other computer, laptop, netbook, Chromebook or tablet sold to schools offers a USB-to-Ethernet wired connectivity option, the use of which is required to comply with EDC §§32060-32064.
Finally, here are informative video slices that are quick to view and easy to understand; you will find more more at
http://rfemf.com/background.html#clarke
http://rfemf.com/presentation/index.html#/1
http://rfemf.com/science.html (especially Dr. Martin Pall’s 9/16/13 Presentation to Portland City Schools re: RF/EMF Microwave Radiation
http://rfemf.com/links.html (especially Dr. Leif Salford, RF/EMF & the Blood Brain Barrier)
http://rfemf.com/news/2013-1214.html
http://rfemf.com/news/2014-0112.html
Dr. Barrie Trower series of 1-2 minute videos
http://rfemf.com/news/2014-0201.html
Dr. Martin Paul 1:12 – 5:15
http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=1m12s to 5:15 duration 4:15
Dr. Paul Dart
Ham Radio Operators
http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=28m21s to 29:15 duration 0:55
Sperm Drop
http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=35m02s to 36:04 duration 1:02
No Wi-Fi in Schools
http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=42m47s to 43:30 duration 0:40
No Wi-Fi in Kreshes
http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=44m19s to 44:41 duration 0:22
Dr. Paul Dart
Wi-Fi Management
http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=48m50s to 49:24 duration 0:35
Dr. Martin Paul
Wi-Fi in Schools
http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=47m00s to 47:45 duration 0:45
Laptop & Tablet Shielding
http://youtu.be/E-nYxZHak6I?t=45m28s to 45:50 duration 0:22
Dr. Martin Pall & Merry Callahan
http://youtu.be/HCAyPMVuJHY?t=2m49s to 6:45 duration 4:00
Dr. Paul Dart
Russian Exposures
http://youtu.be/aRn113m1Dkg?t=4m27s to 6:00 duration 1:30
Calcium Channels
http://youtu.be/aRn113m1Dkg?t=26m21s to 27:30 duration 1:10
Damage DNA Chronic basis
http://youtu.be/i6TxAzXndCg?t=4m19s to 5:13 duration 0:55
Fertility and WiFi
http://youtu.be/i6TxAzXndCg?t=12m30s to 14:25 duration 1:55
Sperm Drop
http://youtu.be/i6TxAzXndCg?t=18m28s to 19:30 duration 1:02
Melatonin
http://youtu.be/aRn113m1Dkg?t=20m14s to 21:08 duration 0:50
http://youtu.be/aRn113m1Dkg?t=21m53s to 23:08 duration 1:20
Population Control & Microwave Radiation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LvSGYU_kG0 duration 7:30
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Dr. Martin Pall & Dr. Paul Dart, M.D. Oregon House of Rep. Health Committee Presentation