The Brea Dam issue may be new to some of you, but not to the Parks and Recreation commission in Fullerton, and especially not to Scott Stanford.
Is there a massive financial scandal brewing involving the property? Here is another SO CALLED CONSERVATIVE Scott Stanford parks and rec appointee from Foolerton’s decaying establishment who is just outright mad at Mr Imbriano, Mr Curleee, and anyone else who shines the light of day on issues. He personally asked me to post this so watch him in action. Just another city hall establishment sycophant who claims to be conservative.
Contrary to Mr Stanford, there is nothing PETTY about ramming dangerous cell towers into neighborhoods right next to peoples homes and right next to schools, framing and attempting to incarcerate citizen activists and a fellow commissioner, the disgusting, dilapidated, grafiitti riddled neglected unsanitary disgusting park bathrooms, busted drinking fountains, busted concrete, gopher hole laden dead parks, dead trees, treacherous decaying playground equipment, the dirty, attempted secret giveaway of the most valueable piece of real estate in the park and rec department, and of course the serious allegations of misuse of public funds at the Brea dam.
Of course Stanford states that he “has nothing vested in his position except for seeing the city run in a good way” Well this is not political, this is not a game, this is push back from awake citizens that want to see the city run in good way. We are not going away so maybe, like he has been tempted to do in the past, he should resign. If he doesn’t like the way this issue is being covered, and the fact that questions are being asked about our money, our parks and our representatives then get the heck off the commission so we can have someone else step up and join the lone voice of reason and logic, Mr Levinson.
So who is this guy? Well he votes for cell towers next to schools and homes without contracts and detailed information ignoring safety and health concerns just like the others with the exception of Barry Levinson.
Who the heck appointed this guy? Well of course he was an at large appointee so the entire council can take credit. Stanford was involved, by his own admission in the golf course giveaway back when the ball started rolling down the proverbial hill that David Curlee’s website http://breadam.org/ just put on the map.
Yes it is full of questions and the only answer this guy seems to have is crickets and innuendo. Par for the course when the lights are on and nobody’s home at city hall. Is Stanford just another RINO? Perhaps but that doesn’t matter because he is just an adviser to council. Fortunately for the taxpayers, because of a possible Brown Act violation and the voice of reason and due diligence, commissioner Levinson, the issue will be back at the table at the next meeting with a more detailed accounting in hopes of answering the serious allegations Mr. Curlee has made against the city of Fullerton. We will keep you posted.
#1 by Fullerton Resident on January 12, 2016 - 3:11 pm
I would like to thank Commissioner Levinson for representing the taxpayers of this city. It seems that city representatives speaking on behalf of the taxpayers is rare these days. I would also like to thank Mr. Imbriano for posting the above You Tube video and giving the Fullerton public a glimpse of what transpires at committee meetings. It was troubling that Commissioner Stanford took offense that some citizens were asking probing questions. His video comments seems to suggest that he is considering resigning because he is no longer enjoying himself. I would advise Commissioner Stanford that maybe he should resign and join some social club of his choice.
It seems to me that a good public servant should welcome citizen’s participation and not criticize it. I usually become suspicious when a government official gets upset/unnerved over detailed questions by its citizens. It certainly is helpful when government has to operate in the bright light of day.
Why Mr Levinson is the Park and Recreation Committee meetings not broadcast on TV and made available on video tape after the fact? It seems if they can do it for the council and planning meeting they can and should do it for all regular committee meetings as well.