PLANNING COMMISSIONER LARRY BENNETT, APPOINTED BY MAYOR JENNIFER FITZGERALD HAS A REAL PROBLEM WITH CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT IN OUR CITY GOVERNMENT.


COMMENTARY BY BARRY LEVINSON

larryii

Larry continues to dig a deeper and deeper hole for himself with his arrogant and contemptuous comments toward the good citizens of Fullerton. He in particular called out the online site called NextDoor, which is a site dedicated to connecting people in the same or adjoining neighborhoods.

bennett

He also made a point in support of this development that also showed his lack of objectivity. According to Commissioner Bennett, the fact that the owner of the property wants to sell to Red Oak is evidence that it is a good project. Think about that statement. Mr. Bennett apparently has been spinning the facts for so long that he does not even realize when he makes comments that on its face defies any common sense.

bennett-1111

Of course the owner of the land wants his sale to be consummated. But to use that fact as justification that it is a good deal for the community is beyond the pale. bennett

 

This man, LARRY BENNETT wants to be your next city council member.

1-1

 

Tell LARRY BENNETT on November 8th, that before we would consider giving him our vote, he first has to demonstrate that he actually represents us and not all the special interests.

tip-of-the-hat-640x527-1

larryt

 

bennett-form

P.S. I noticed yesterday that two large banners for Larry Bennett for Fullerton City Council were on the fencing in front of the closed Fullerton Internal Medicine building, the site where Melia Homes wants to build all those townhomes.

larry-1

Since that issue can and probably will come up for a vote again to the Planning Commission, it seems those banners could create at least the appearance of a conflict of interest.

larry-4

 

 

Question: Do we need another council member who seems to favor the special interests over the good people of Fullerton?

 

larry

I REPORT, YOU DECIDE.

By Barry Levinson

  1. #1 by Do Not Agree on October 19, 2016 - 11:44 am

    if the police and fire unions are such great organizations, then why Danny Boy do they spend the vast majority of their money protecting their pay and benefits and not on helping the community that pays them so, so generously? It sounds pretty selfish to me. I have seen the FPOA questionnaire for candidates for Fullerton City Council. Almost all questions are concerned not with the health, safety and ecumenic well being of the community but rather protecting their selfish, self-centered interests. The FPOA is all about the money, benefits and protecting all cops even the worst among them.

    • #2 by Anonymous on October 19, 2016 - 1:53 pm

      Fire & police exist to pay their salaries, not in service to the public. They are an end in themselves.

    • #3 by Danny Boy on October 19, 2016 - 6:31 pm

      Of course they are. It’s a never ending task to keep politicians from taking their pay and benefits. It’s also a never ending task keeping politics out of policing. Pobar is there for a reason. If it was up to politicians they would hang cops for fun just to satisfy a few. So yes someone has to look after the cops. It’s their unions. They do a good job.

    • #4 by Danny Boy on October 19, 2016 - 6:33 pm

      Of course you see that. That’s their main focus. Have you seen how much the unions donate to the charitable organizations in Fullerton each year? Or you don’t care? They support all kinds of charitable functions and groups. What else do you want the unions to do? The police and fire are deeply involved in community functions on duty daily. The unions are off duty and they do plenty. But you don’t care about that. Pull the union tax returns.

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!