THE EARTH IS REALLY FLAT-Next to evolution, the ball earth model is the greatest lie ever told.

SCHOOLS TEACH YOUR CHILDREN TO BE IDIOTS WITH LIE AFTER LIE AS THEY FORCE YOUR CHILDREN TO BE INJECTED WITH STERILIZING TOXIC METALLIC NANO TECH VACCINES, FORCE THEM TO BE STERILIZED BY WIRELESS MICROWAVE CLASSROOM EMISSIONS, TO BELIEVE THERE IS NO GOD, AND HOW TO BE THE ULTIMATE FORM OF CHATTEL PROPERTY ALL THE WHILE THEY TURN THEM INTO SELFISH, SEX CRAZED, MATERIALISTIC, STATIST, SATANICALLY MIND CONTROLLED MEDIA SLAVES THAT NOW COMPRISE THE BIGGEST FLOCK OF SHEEP HEADED FOR SLAUGHTER IN HUMAN HISTORY.

The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork

Water is always level. Plumb is perpendicular to the level so the earth cannot be a sphere. Using the angles from shadows from goal posts and standard grade trigonometry you can show sun is close by in the sky above. The world is flat and motionless. The biggest proof of spherical earth was NASA. Hindenburg was another hoax to stop people using balloons which are cheap! We live in the Trueman show in arrested development. Aeronautics is stagnant and has been for years. The world is run by actors. Our reality is not holographic but is illusory nonetheless. Our perceptions are managed from childhood. History is fabricated.

JUST LOOK AT THIS RECENT NASA PHOTO AND THE EARTH’S SIZE SUPPOSEDLY TAKEN FROM A MILLION MILES AWAY in mid July 2015 WITH THE MOST MODERN ADVANCED EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE. IT SHOWS A MASSIVE EARTH AND A SMALL MOON FROM A MILLION MILES AWAY ?

download (33)

NASA IMAGE FROM JULY 2015 SUPPOSEDLY 1 MILLION MILES FROM EARTH

OPEN YOUR EYES AND ASK YOURSELF WHAT KIND OF TRILLION DOLLAR BULLSHIT IS THIS?

apollo11return_nasa

FOOTAGE FROM APOLLO 11 1969

 

NOW COMPARE IT TO THE ONE FROM 40+ YEARS AGO SUPPOSEDLY TAKEN FROM THE MOON-THE EARTH SHOULD APPEAR TO BE MASSIVE! THIS IS A TOTAL JOKE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. HOW CAN NASA BE SO STUPID? BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT ALL OF YOU ARE AND WOULD NEVER QUESTION ANY OF THIS. 

HOW CAN SOMETHING CLOSER APPEAR TO BE SMALLER AND APPEAR LARGER WHEN IT IS FARTHER AWAY?

-THESE PHOTOS ALONG WITH THE REST OF NASA’S COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGES ARE ALL FAKE-PERIOD.

IF YOU WERE ON THE MOON, EVEN CLOSER TO THE EARTH, THE EARTH WOULD APPEAR EVEN BIGGER THAN THIS NASA FAKE FROM THE FAKED MOON LANDING-JUST LOOK AT THE PHOTO BELOW THIS ONE AGAIN

AS11-44-6551

WHAT KIND OF PERSPECTIVE IS THIS?

images

NASA 2015

IT IS THE PERSPECTIVE OF BEING UNABLE TO THINK. LOOK AT THE TINY EARTH FROM THE FAKE PICTURES SUPPOSEDLY TAKEN FROM THE MOON 40 YEARS AGO-

apollo11return_nasa

NASA 1969

THE MOON LANDINGS WERE A TOTAL FAKE BORDERING ON A TOTAL JOKE-

https://thefullertoninformer.com/a-paper-moon/

THIS IS NOT A MATTER OF INTELLIGENCE, THIS IS A MATTER OF TRUTH. I DONT CARE HOW MANY OF YOU MADE A LIVING TAKING PART IN A COMPARTMENTALIZED EXISTENCE AS PART OF THE SPACE PROGRAM OR ANY ANCILLARY PURSUITS. WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO ABOUT EVERYTHING LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. IF THEY WILL LIE ABOUT THIS, THERE IS NO END TO THE DECEPTION AND TO DEPTHS WE WILL BE TAKEN DOWN TO. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A LONG TIME.

Instinct is something which transcends knowledge. We have, undoubtedly, certain finer fibers that enable us to perceive truths when logical deduction, or any other willful effort of the brain, is futile.” –NIKOLA TESLA

HAVE THE EDUCRAT LACKEYS FINISHED OFF YOUR CHILDREN’S ABILITY TO THINK WITH MIND BENDING ROTE REPETITION OF USELESS CRAP THAT THEY CALL AN EDUCATION JUST SO THEY CAN GET A JOB DEVELOPING WEAPONIZED TECHNOLOGY  OR POISONOUS MEDICATIONS TO SOFT KILL THE UNSUSPECTING ?

HAVE THE EDUCRAT LACKEYS WITH THEIR RIDICULOUS BS SCIENCE FINISHED OFF YOUR CHILDREN’S INNATE INSTINCTS THAT GOD CREATED THEM AND EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD?

HAVE THE EDUCRAT LACKEYS FINISHED OF YOUR CHILDREN’S CONNECTION TO THE ONE WHO PUT THE 75,000 MILES OF CIRCULATORY SYSTEM IN THE INCREDIBLE BODIES?

THEY ARE LYING TO US ABOUT EVERYTHING FOLKS AS THEY FORCIBLY INJECT YOUR CHILDREN, POISON THE WATER AND FOOD, SPRAY THE SKIES WITH LINE AFTER LINE OF AEROSOLIZED CHEMTRAILS, AND DROWN YOU ALL IN A COCTAIL OF BOOZE, ASPARTAME LACED BEVERAGES AND ENDLESS STERILIZING ZOMBIFYING WIRELESS EMISSIONS.

THIS IS ALL A SATANIC DECEPTION TO GET GOD OUT OF THE PICTURE SO THEY CAN TELL YOU ALL YOU ARE NOTHING MORE THAN ACCIDENTS AND ANIMALS SO THEY CAN TURN YOU ALL INTO ANIMALS AND TREAT YOU LIKE ANIMALS-IT IS ALREADY HAPPENING. LOOK AROUND!

OPEN YOUR EYES BEFORE THE SCREEN TIME INDUCED MACULAR DEGENERATION MAKES IT NO LONGER POSSIBLE TO PERCEIVE REALITY THE WAY A FIVE YEAR OLD DOES WITH THE GOD GIVEN GIFT OF HIS TWO EYEBALLS HALF CLOSED.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5LzJrVKmBk

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLMRWvXuc5U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3nmNfJsKEg

13 Comments

ANOTHER BRICK IN THE WALL-PROFESSOR EMERITUS MARK A SHAPIRO ON WIRELESS IN SCHOOLS

Shame on Cal State Fullerton’s Dr. Mark H. Shapiro for talking out his pie hole on wireless

WHEN IT COMES TO DEFENDING THE FORCED IRRADIATION OF THE HELPLESS CHILDREN IN THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, THEY COULDN’T HAVE ROLLED OUT A BETTER CIRCUS CLOWN THAN THIS CHARACTER.

Shapiro-150w_400x400

Cal State Fullerton’s Dr. Mark H. Shapiro

WHERE DOES ONE BEGIN? WELL FOR STARTERS, AN INTRODUCTION. Read the rest of this entry »

3 Comments

POLITICAL MACHINATIONS STARTING EARLY IN THE CITY OF FULLERTON-by Barry Levinson

POLITICAL MACHINATIONS STARTING EARLY IN THE CITY OF FULLERTON

Barry Levinson

BARRY LEVINSON

It is more than 15 months until the November 2016 elections, yet it is clear that the political establishment is already making its move to make sure that those that play ball get on the political team.

No one who has run for city council in Fullerton has been and will continue to be more outspoken on all the issues that will impact the citizens of Fullerton than myself. I do not need to talk with political advisors or worry whether a particular position will do me more political good than harm. I could care less, because to much is at stake and it starts at the grass roots level in local towns and cities like my city of Fullerton.  Read the rest of this entry »

24 Comments

P.O.B.A.R IN ACTION: WATCH AS THEY MURDER NOW AND YOU PAY LATER

6bd5fa348b8f3a1f7c0f6a7067001418

It took 9 long painstaking months to form this child in the womb, and it took years of sleepless nights with doctor visits and emergency room scares just to get him to become a little boy, and years of long workweeks to put food on the table and a roof over his head so he could become a man, all to be snuffed out by some bloodthirsty demonic cop. I don’t care what color this child’s skin was, what kind of upbringing he had, what his taste in music was, what tattoos he sported or what he ate or drank. HIS BLOOD WAS JUST AS RED AS ALL OF OUR OWN.

CJ7cw-uUkAAPflq

Why do we teach children in junior and high school a bunch of worthless bullshit 16th century poetry, revisionist history that turns out a slave mentality, balkanizing ethnic studies, bogus intelligence insulting science and worthless mind bending math that they will never use and purposely omit the most important lessons of all-their rights and remedies as Americans, their civic responsibilities, and how to deal with and engage the police.

Maybe your own denial will force you to comfortably sit back and blame the underprivileged youth, their parents, the gangs,drug dealers or the movie industry. You can blame whatever you want because your children will be next.

All it takes is one wrong move and every hope and dream you as parents have ever amassed will be wiped clean in an instant and it will all be covered up and cleaned up on your taxpayer dime. Truth be told the blood is on all of our hands ladies and gentlemen because we have allowed the cops have their bill of rights (POBAR) which happens to be trumping our very own.

Yes the pulpits in the phony worthless churches are silent, the secular humanist schools are complicit, local elected bodies go along for the ride with zippers over their forked tongue mouths and the government is slowly turning against its own with it now being right out in the open as they takes millions of our tax dollars to pay the clean up charges to get all of innocent blood shed all over the street running down the gutters up off the ground. When will it all end?

Ladies and gentlemen, like I have publicly stated before on record, there exist three remedies as an American and they are as follows in this order:

First there is the soap box, which is our right to grandstand in order to disseminate the need and urgency for reforms through the peaceful exercise of our First Amendment protected speech, the right to assemble and have access to and utilize a free press.

When that is not successful, we must resort to the ballot box. Whether it be through the initiative process, elections, recalls or legislative enactment, this is the second peaceful way to enact much needed change to further the interests in protecting and safeguarding liberty at large and the furtherance of a peaceful society.

As a last resort, when all other peaceful measures fail and have been exhausted, it will eventually come down to the cartridge box as it is incumbent upon all Americans  to water the tree of liberty with their very own blood and that of other patriots. Yes, we have been bequeathed with a remedy unlike any anywhere else on earth- The second amendment.

As we are now in a state of militarized police, with military personnel being deployed on the streets with the psychological and media conditioning through operation Jade Helm 2015, you all need to realize that what they are gearing up for is what comprised our founding fathers’ worst fears.

May this child’s blood not have been shed in vain but rather on this July 15. 2015, may you take the time to educate your children on how to deal with the police, how to navigate and participate in our cherished civic processes, how to effect sound public policy, how to select and elect principled leaders, and how to undo wrongs that need to be righted through the legal democratic processes so that we may never have to stoop to the level of the demonic cold blooded thugs such as what you are about to see right below in this video.

3 Comments

MIKE ERRE IS GONE: EV FREE AIN’T WHAT IT USED TO BE OR IS IT?

 LEWIS Read the rest of this entry »

,

42 Comments

Some Straight Talk About Our Current Situation and How it Relates to Our 4th of July Celebrations. by Barry Levinson

The City of Fullerton Celebrates the 4th of July in Grand Style.

Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson

Yesterday my family attended the City of Fullerton’s celebration of the 4th of July with games for the kids and food and music for all to enjoy. As always the fireworks show accompanied by music was a roaring success.  

The Park and Recreation Department takes the lead in ensuring a great event and congratulations should be given to all those Park and Recreation employees who worked hard both prior to and at the celebration. Also I would like to thank Hugo Curiel, the Director of the Fullerton Parks and Recreation Department for a job well done.  Read the rest of this entry »

11 Comments

North Korea on the Fourth Of July

So here we are 240 years after Independence from England and enslaved to a system deeper than our ancestral counter parts ever were. Granted some of you may have a few more zeros in the bank accounts that can be wiped clean overnight than others, but at least back then, their minds and their children were their own. So where are we really? There is little to celebrate on this Independence day when on the heels of forced vaccinations: https://thefullertoninformer.com/fast-and-furious-fast-tracking-sb-277-forced-sterilization-and-the-death-of-paul-walker/

kim 13

Fullerton’s ex 65th Assembly so-called conservative Young Kim who voted yes on SB 277-forced vaccinations, yes on AB 57-fast tracking cell towers in residential neighborhoods, and who was absent from her committee vote on a bill that would require an parental opt-in for Planned Parenthood’s kinky sex ed programs.

Read the rest of this entry »

157 Comments

Barry Levinson on Common Core

Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson

To All OCBE Trustee Members: July 1, 2015

Last night at St. Paul’s Lutheran Church in North Fullerton, Dr. Bidell spoke to a group of about 100 people. Every one of them was against Common Core for many very valid reasons as follows: For its reliance on computer testing, for its lack of parental access to those computers and what their kids are learning, to the attack on family privacy and the dumbing down of our children with new methods that have not been tested.

I asked Dr. Bidell would he vote with his two colleagues to sue the state over Common Core. He would not give me a direct answer. Then Read the rest of this entry »

5 Comments

Press Release: SB277 Referendum Filed by Former Assemblyman Tim Donnelly

download (32)

 

Today, Former Assemblyman Tim Donnelly Filed papers to qualify a Referendum against SB277, the bill forcing the vaccination of every child, who wishes to attend public or private school in California. Former Assemblyman Donnelly stated, “This referendum is not about vaccinations; it is about defending the fundamental freedom of a parent to make an informed decisions for their children without being unduly penalized by a government that believes it knows best.” See Referendum Petition: https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0035%20%28Referendum%20of%20SB%20277%29.pd California enjoys one of the highest vaccination rates in the country, and until recently respected the right of individuals for personal or religious reasons to opt out of some or all vaccinations.  When Governor Jerry Brown signed SB277, he deprived every Californians of that choice should they wish to send their children to a private or public school.  For the vast majority, this is not an issue, but for those who are concerned about the inherent risks of an ever increasing schedule of vaccinations, or who themselves or their children have suffered severe reactions, up to and including death, having the freedom to opt out is everything. Now, that freedom is subject to the arbitrary control and subjective determination of a doctor and the government, instead of the parent.  By referencing SB277, we intend to work with every individual and group willing to collect the signatures necessary to place it on the 2016 ballot and allow all Californians to decide.
Contact:  Tim Donnelly or Lauren Stephens Phone: 760-933-8460 or email: Info@SB277Referendum.com FaceBook:  https://www.facebook.com/SB277Referendum?fref=ts Twitter:  @SB277referendum PO Box 1170, Sanger, CA 93657

8 Comments

Shame on Fullerton’s homegrown sellout Young Kim for the betrayal of millions of children voting Yes on SB 277

kim 6

Young Kim claims that, after a lot of thoughtful consideration, she rises to support SB 277.

Ms. Kim, your consideration is not what matters. What matters are  the rights of your constituents and your duty is to uphold the Constitution and to protect the welfare of everyone.  SB 277 and vaccines do no such thing.  

kim 7 Read the rest of this entry »

8 Comments

Shame on Cal State Fullerton’s Dr. Mark H. Shapiro for talking out his pie hole on wireless-part 2

Hey doc-I handed you a paper on a silver platter that showed rats that had their ovaries exposed for 15 minutes a day for 15 days with pulsed microwave RF exposure that ended up having their ovarian reserves looking like Folsom lake after they drained it for the geo engineered drought photo op. You sent me that publication that showed all kinds of apples and orange comparisons with frequencies and and effects everywhere except where I asked you to look-ovarian reserves and the effects on the female ovum.
The report only had 2 out of 75+ studies that dealt with FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS AND THEY BOTH SHOWED EFFECTS. I handed you the plans from Apple that just so happen to have exact replicas of the female reproductive components and fertilized eggs getting electrocuted in their landscape architecture plans who also just so happen to have the exclusive contracts in all the schools.
Look, I am not asking for much from a big shot like you. I just want you to use your noggin for a minute. You think that putting 15,000 iPads in the laps of students in the Fullerton School District when no one can show me one study on the effects at 2.4 GHz on the eggs?
Why is it that according to what you provided me with, in response to what I provided you with, the study admits that research of the female reproductive system is “SCARCE”. Hey professor emeritus, doesn’t that translate to the fact that we need to do more studies before we deploy this crap or does this translate to how an agenda is allowed to proceed under our noses, even the so called smart people like yourself?
How the heck did Dr. Pletka manage to get 15,000 iPads that emit a class 2B carcinogen into the laps of all the boys and girls in the classrooms when NO ONE EVER BOTHERED TO SEE WHAT THE HELL THIS CRAP DOES TO THE GIRLS EGGS OR FOLLICLES while these things will spend years in their laps. THIS IS ALL THE WHILE THAT APPLE SPENDS 5 BILLION DOLLARS ON THEIR HEADQUARTERS WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANS THAT LAY IT ALL OUT LIKE SOME SICK JOKE. What kind of demonic scientific fraud is everyone taking part in? Ok, yeah and you worked for decades as a professor at CSF and you also claim you don’t know anyone over at the school district.  I guess you need to work on your social skills as well as your research skills.
I asked point blank questions and you come back with spin, deflections, mixing up sunlight with microwaves, 60 Hz electricity, power lines, light bulb emissions and sun tans. We are talking about the exact frequency at which the maximum dielectric loss of water begins at power levels trillions of times background levels with slot antenna deployment at point blank range, in direct contact with the sensitive developing reproductive organs of young children for hours on end every day for 15 years for 15,000 children in Fullerton and tens of millions of children nationwide. What kind of scientist are you Shapiro? Are you going to tell everyone that the iPad programs in the schools are totally safe for the children like Dr Pletka said? Or are you going to step back and be honest, and say maybe this isn’t such a good idea and help us rescue these children from these reckless school administrators, brain dead chicken shit board members and scared, ignorant, cowardly, vain, immature parents who are frozen in their tracks. Come on doc.
What kind of scientist are you Shapiro? Are you going to tell everyone that the iPad programs in the schools are totally safe for the children like Dr Pletka said? Or are you going to step back and be honest, and say maybe this isnt such a good idea and help us rescue these children from these reckless, evil school administratobrain-dead, worthless, lackey, evil board members and scared, ignorant, cowardly, vain, immature parents who are frozen in their tracks. Come on doc.
WHEN IT COMES TO DEFENDING THE FORCED IRRADIATION OF THE HELPLESS CHILDREN IN…
THEFULLERTONINFORMER.COM
  • Susie-g Neblett-d SHAME on him!
  • Susie Shuff Gapinski How many studies did he reference exactly? I don’t generally read the observer. I did read the one where they reported on the 100 + scientists saying that wifi is bad. And the same article where they took a swipe at the unnamed person who has been bringing this to the FSD’s attention for some time now.
  • Diane King The number of international scientists that say the WiFi is bad is now at 200. http://www.emfscientist.org
    • Veronica Zrnchik replied · 1 Reply
  • Mark H. Shapiro · Friends with Neal Kelley and 3 others

    Mr. Imbriano I have sent you a private message concerning your personal attacks on me. Please read it.
  • Mark H. Shapiro · 4 mutual friends

    Mr. Imbriano your comments about me are false, defamatory, and potentially libelous. While you certainly have the right to disagree with my scientific conclusions and opinions, that does not give you the right to make false accusations about my qualifications and experience as a scientist, to infer that they were motivated by anything other than a desire to inform the public about the issue under discussion, nor to infer that I am somehow a spokesperson for the Fullerton School District or any other public body or agency. Please remove the comments from your facebook page and yourfullertoninformer.com website that are just scurrilous personal attacks.
    • Diane King Dr. Shapiro, Please consider rewriting your “opinion” piece, deferring to the findings and knowledge of 200 scientists that are experts in EMF research and health. They have characterized the proliferation of unnatural EMF as a public health crisis. This was not done lightly. THEY KNOW. Please rewrite your letter and yield to the message of these experts. Your position, as it stands, is indefensible.
    • Mark H. Shapiro · Friends with Neal Kelley and 3 others

      Ms. King there are competent scientists on both sides of this issue, but in my professional judgement those who signed the letter to WHO misunderstand the actual risk presented by smart meters and wi-fi transmitters mainly because they don’t correctly understand the physics of electromagnetic radiation. The most extensive study of the effects of electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell phones and other devices that emit electromagnetic radiation was carried out in the UK over a period of more than a decade, involved hundreds of scientists from several countries who are experts in the field, using careful double blind studies where possible and case-matched epidemiological studies. Scores of papers from this effort have been published in refereed scientific journals. The bottom line from all this work is that no credible definitive evidence of deleterious health effects were observed at the dose levels encountered while using cell phones or other devices including trunked radio transceivers that emit significantly more EMR in this frequency range than cell phones. There were some hints in the data that very heavy cell phone usage might produce slight increases in the rate of certain types of rare brain cancers, though the evidence was at best equivocal. This is why I reached the conclusions I did. The most interesting result from this study in my view came from the double-blind study on people who have complained about “electrosensitive” effects from the use of cell phones or trunked-radio transceivers. When these people were tested against a control group of people who claimed no such sensitivity in totally shielded enclosures with a transmitter that was randomly turned on an off without the knowledge of the participants. There was no statistically significant effect observed. In other words, people who claimed to be electrosensitive reported “effects” at no higher rate when the transmitter was on than when it was off. And in tests when people were asked to determine when the transmitter was on or off depending on how they felt, “electrosensitive” people were no better at identifying when the transmitter was on or off than the control group. Please read the reports from all these studies yourself, and compare them with some of the much less well-controlled studies that report positive effects. As I noted in the article that was printed in the Observer, I think that one should err on the side of caution with regard to very heavy use of a cellphone held to one’s ear given the hint of a positive effect in this study and one other one that I quoted that involve results from a population of radio amateurs (as a radio amateur myself for more than 60 years I have followed this issue carefully since we typically are exposed to much higher levels of electromagnetic radiation than the general public.) I stand by my original conclusions The references for the UK study can be found at: http://www.mthr.org.uk/
    • Penelope Landis Mr. Shapiro, how can you say there is “no Credible evidence?” what do you call this? Effects Of 2.4 Ghz Radiofrequency Radiation Emitted From Wi-Fi Equipment On microRna Expression In Brain Tissue
      Int J Radiat Biol. 2015 Mar 16:1-26.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25775055?dopt=Abstract
    • Penelope Landis Mr. Shapiro, you realized that this radiation damages brains and we are talking about children. Please see this research on low level radiation.https://docs.google.com/…/1xACAlbFUSEwJIF555wlGbMR…/edit
    • Penelope Landis Mr. Shapiro, the research that you quote is incomplete and I do not see you citing current science nor the wealth of science that exists.http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/pii/S0006291X15003988
    • Veronica Zrnchik Also, there are many shortcomings to these “detector” studies. They do not take into account that what a person is sensitive to is very different. People are sensitive to all different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. To test everyone with one type of signal is surely going to fail as it may very well be a signal to which they have no sensitivity. In addition Mr Shapiro, they did not take into account the different symptoms and delayed responses to the exposures. Some people get symptoms hours later. Some are affected right way and some have both. Some of those devices were still emiting signals in “sham” mode. The testing with one signal is like testing for food allergies. You would not test for food allergies using only one food. Obviously you would miss lots of allergies that way–would you not. Also, it sounds like you know alot about physics etc. So you might be aware of the fact that there are specific windows of effect for many frequencies in regards to biological effects. There is NOT a linear effect. It is nonlinear. A higher frequency or intensity does not always increase the symptoms. In fact, in some cases, there is no effect from increasing exposures and there is a decrease in effect. Was that taken into account? I’m not sure it was. So those experiements wheer they determine if people are dectors or not were not very scientific AND not being a detector does not eliminate the possibility that you are affected by something. If someone went to a picnic and got an upset stomach from a food–would the fact that he/she could not identify the exact food that made them ill negate the fact that they were ill?? It is a silly test really. And finally, have you seen the studies that document only biological effects and is double blind. Clearly the body has biological reactions in heart rate, blood preasure, blood clumping, iris dialiation etc. These were done with animals and people. Clearly animals cannot be experiencing the nocebo effect from reading about the study in the newspaper!! Those exposure tests or studies are ignorant and just an additiional way to obfuscate the truth by delaying the publics understanding and acceptance of this condition.
    • Joe Imbriano

      Write a reply…
       
  • Diane King Mr. Shapiro, Enough is KNOWN of the biological effects of EMF to remove this from our children’s classrooms. Let it be known that your stance flies in the face of the increasing population that is getting sick (ES) from these exposures, people dying prematurely from RF radiation. How many dead bodies is enough? To proceed ahead, as you are doing, is indicative of a lack of humanity. To proceed ahead in attempting to influence/inform others against thousands of studies that attest to the health harms is unforgivable. As stated previously, your position is indefensible and this is especially true in this context where it involves our children. Only you know your motivation for doing so.
  • Diane King Mr. Shapiro, There may very well be competent scientists on both sides but being competent does not bring with it integrity, honesty, ethics or morality. Enough of the science has been been hijacked/bought off by the industry and continually paraded around, denying the health effects. If you had done your research on this aspect of the ‘science’ you would have an understanding of that. If you did not, you surely would have remembered our history in which it took decades to determine that smoking caused cancer. Smoking didn’t cause cancer until it did. Why did it take decades? Corruption and yielding to industry over the lives and health of the populace. There are no ethics or morality in that. From all appearances, Mr. Shapiro, you are part of this.
    Like · Reply ·

Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments

FULLERTON BUDGET VOTE Or why can’t we get a majority of our council to be concerned with our budget deficits?

 

FULLERTON BUDGET VOTE

Or why can’t we get a majority of our council to be concerned with our budget deficits? by Barry Levinson

 

Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson

On Tuesday, the 9th of June, the city council split their votes 2 for and 2 against the 2015-2016 and the 2016-2017 budgets that had projected million dollar plus deficits for at least the next two years. Fitzgerald and Flory voted for the budget and Whitaker and Sebourn voted against approving the budget as presented by the city. Council member Chaffee was absent, which created an even number of council members to be present and thus resulted in the budget vote going down to defeat. It will be revisited in the upcoming council meeting on Tuesday June 16th.  Read the rest of this entry »

13 Comments

Fullerton City Council Meeting Results by Barry Levinson

Fullerton City Council Meeting Results by Barry Levinson

images (18)

Barry Levinson

They are considering 3 options to reduce the water loss at Laguna Lake. However, the only action taken on Laguna Lake last night was to approve a consultant contract to determine the cause of and solutions for the water loss and bring back the results NLT the July 21 council meeting. I will keep residents informed when this item comes back to council. The rest of the plan was officially approved at the meeting.  Read the rest of this entry »

18 Comments

Shame on Cal State Fullerton’s Dr. Mark H. Shapiro for talking out his pie hole on wireless

WHEN IT COMES TO DEFENDING THE FORCED IRRADIATION OF THE HELPLESS CHILDREN IN THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, INTRODUCING

Shapiro-150w_400x400

Cal State Fullerton’s Dr. Mark H. Shapiro

WHERE DOES ONE BEGIN? WELL FOR STARTERS, AN INTRODUCTION. Read the rest of this entry »

25 Comments

Why Can’t Fullerton City Government Be Administered Like Any Other Well-Run Non-Profit Organization? By Barry Levinson

 

images (18)Why Can’t Fullerton City Government Be Administered Like Any

Other Well-Run Non-Profit Organization? By Barry Levinson

 

The rule of thumb with non-profit organizations, such as charities is that 60 to 90% of the money goes directly to its mission and only 10 to 40% goes to actually running the non-profit, i.e. administrative costs. Now we come to another non-profit institution, the City of Fullerton. Read the rest of this entry »

3 Comments

Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!