On March 5th, 2013, we launched this website to end the largest forced irradiation of children that the world has ever known. Millions and millions and millions of hits spanning the globe and all levels of the power structure on the planet indicate that we have struck a nerve. What do we get for our birthday? http://fsd.k12.ca.us/index.html
HERE IS OUR OPINION OF THEIR PROPAGANDA AND OUR SATIRICALLY SERIOUS VERSION AS SEEN THROUGH THE DONNING OF THE “THEY LIVE” GLASSES.
Launching of the District’s 1:1 Visible Irradiaton Program (VIP)
Inspiring learners to leverage the arts and innovative technology to create, collaborate, communicate, critically think, and contribute as part of a global community.
Requiring parents to expose their learners while leveraging their own tax money for potentially dangerous wireless technology. What will it create? With whom will the data collaborate and communicate? common core privacy concerns. Will they really critically think as their screen time takes hold instead of them contributing to their local community. Global citizens huh? You don’t say.
Happy Birthday to the Fullerton Informer which began on March 5, 2013, our mission where we are trying to save every student in the FSD from being provided with an microwave transmitter headed straight for their laps and a router hanging over their heads. Pletka demands that iPads which have NO ETHERNET ports be utilized-excerpt from letter dated 10-3-13
“Since the use of iPads already occurs during about 90 percent of classroom time at the fifth grade level, your request to remove ________ from class anytime iPads are in use would be educationally detrimental to him and is respectfully denied.” Robert Pletka.
—–Yeah never you mind that 20,000 microwatts of pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation trillions of times the normal background levels in my children’s laps could have been reproductively detrimental to them. Well fortunately they are no longer being forcibly irradiated in Pletka’s program but what about the other 14,000 FSD students condemned to the same electronic sardine cans for 6 hours a day?
In order to ensure that our students are being exposed to the maximum amount of pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation all while using our children to make rich, it appears that the purveyors of this irrelevant technology desire to impair their learning. Harvard trained pediatric neurologist Dr. Martha Herbert’s take on wireless . This program aims to provide young students with 21st Century student specific skills like looking up answers, using a calculator, watching and playing video games like minecraft, full of content knowledge, and three dimensional thinking illiteracy that will help them be mastered by the technocracy’s multi-dimensional ability to subject its users to an involuntary radiation exposure required in the 21st Century classroom and beyond. https://thefullertoninformer.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/
Please feel free to view the 1:1 VIP video by clicking on either the English,Español, or Korean version.
For access to the parent letter containing more information about this new program, please click on one of the following versions – English Español Korean.
There you have it right in front of your eyes ladies and gentlemen. Looks like the iPad has X’d out your children’s offspring in the picture. As if the X box didn’t have that one under lock and key already with the wireless controller in the lap and the transmitter that never sleeps. video game addiction defined
One nation under irradiation with iPads, corrective lenses in the making, video game addictions, possible infertility and routers for all.
The three dimensional world is no match for highly addictive screens. Next stop, the optometrist.
The microwave transmitters heading for the laps of your children stacked in front of the chairs where the “Fullerton Five” have green lighted the common core’s microwave matrix.
Brought to you by : The occupants of the empty black chairs
This is how we do it.
Now now children, you must comply and irradiate. We are watching you so we can get the most out of all of you. robert-pletka-recognizing-voltage-potential/
The microwave transmitter in direct proximity to the female ovum.
X marks the spot. Girls are born with their eggs. What is this high frequency pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation transmitter doing to the longest lived and most important cells in their bodies as it remains there for hours a day at school and at home every day? what-is-wifi-doing-to-your-daughters
One of the ringleaders looking on as the earpieces act as conduits of RF emissions to the young developing brains.
The look of love as this agent of the state complies with the top down mandatory wireless exposure edict from above. She should remember this one as I handed one to her last year: https://thefullertoninformer.com/is-this-your-child/
The tools of the forced irradiation being logged and unpacked.
Notice the podium where I have spoken repeatedly for this to be stopped pushed aside, flanked by the images of those who could still stop this but choose to ignore the other side of this story.
Is this your tax money turned against your children’s reproductive future?
Someone made a nice commission off of this one. Just think of lead flux oozing from the drinking fountains, the empty toilet paper dispensers, the hand dryers’ 10 year old unchanged filters, the rocky road asphalt, the 35 kids crammed into the electronic sardine cans, the furlough days, and the improper spectrum lighting that all the dough spent on these soon to be outdated toys could have repaired, filled, replaced, slurry coated, alleviated, ended or installed.
GET A LOAD OF THESE ACCOLADES TO A SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT IS REPLETE WITH FORCED EXPOSURE TO A CLASS 2B CARCINOGEN FOR ALL STUDENTS, A LITTLE BIT OF CHILD MOLESTATION AS AN ASIDE http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?id=9441743,
GARNISHED WITH A DISTRICT EMPLOYEE KNEEING A CHILD IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD THAT LEFT THE CHILD LEGALLY BLIND.
http://media.wix.com/ugd/50dca9_e9b5d2ef740743979dbcd0d09bd345aa.pdf -SEE PAGE 2
I won’t even go into how the teacher of the year at Acacia put my son outside to take a test with the gardeners running their equipment in direct proximity with the DOOR CLOSED on a open campus. Of course they deny this happened. Yeah safety glasses for the gardeners and none for my son and what a wonderful environment for him to take a test in. I digress.
Yes as Robert Pletka tells us that this is all “……..totally safe for the children”. A.S.C.I.P. with their big cheeses, the District’s insurance company, just handed ten grand in tax money over to Pletka’s irradiators and minions for the “excellence in loss control”? Are you out of your mind? So out of 120 school districts, with our forced microwave irradiation of children, an alleged staff induced head injury leading to blindness and a teacher admitting to child molestation, is this the best client A.S.C.I.P’s got? Pretty creepy if you ask me.
2014 ASCIP “Excellence in Loss Control” Award
  |
Fullerton School District is the proud recipient of ASCIP’s 2014 “Excellence in Loss Control Award.” ASCIP (the Alliance for Schools Cooperative Insurance Program) is a coalition of 120 member school districts which work together to provide outstanding insurance, risk management, and loss prevention services specifically targeted for students and schools. With the Award, ASCIP recognizes one district each year that exemplifies the characteristics of a loss control leader by demonstrating a commitment to controlling risk exposures, minimizing losses, and improving the safety of students, staff, and the general public. The Award includes a $10,000 prize to the District.ASCIP recognized Fullerton School District for its proactive approach to risk management, especially in the field of up-front risk assessment. The District was also recognized for its training, implementation of best practices and recommended protocols, sharing of “lessons learned” with other districts, and thinking creatively to come up with out-of-the box solutions.Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, Susan Hume; Risk Manager Laurie Bruneau; and Letty Cortez, Risk Management Specialist, accepted the Award for the District at ASCIP’s annual meeting. |
A.S.C.I.P. are the same folks who ordered the RF survey that yielded impossibly low results at Acacia and made us turn off our camera at their meeting which was illegal by the way.Up in Glendale, A.S.C.I.P hired the same firm, Executive Environmental. The chief executive officer of that company was questioned by a school board member during a presentation on the safety of WiFi at a publicly broadcast school board meeting. The board member is a dentist and she wanted to know why WiFi was banned in certain European countries. A.S.C.I.P’s contractor DIDN’T KNOW THE ANSWER! ITS ON CAMERA. IS THAT A.S.C.I.P. CONTRACTOR EXEMPLIFYING LOSS CONTROL?
http://gusd.granicus.com/
At 2 hours and 44 minutes watch the MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION GET ASKED AND WATCH FOR THE THREE EXPERTS’ (GLENDALE’S IT DIRECTOR, FULLERTON’S OWN ROMAN SCHULZE AND EXECUTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL’S DANIEL GINSBORG) TRILLION DOLLAR ANSWER IN HIGH FIDELITY.
Ginsborg is the one who did the RF survey for A.S.C.I.P. over at Acacia earlier this year and is the advisor to the FSD. Schulze is known as Schulzee or R Schuzle on this blog’s comment section. We had a post dedicated to him and his tactics:
The following is an excerpt from an incredible web site: http://rfemf.com/
“Certainly, our schools should, at the very least, provide choice: designate some schools in every CA school district that are free from wireless signals.
Here are some comments at 39:30 – 42:10 in the 3/12/14 recording of “Today on Your Call: How are digital devices affecting children’s health?” at http://kalw.org/programs/your-call. It was a direct appeal to KALW General Manager, Matt Martin, that ensured that my call was put on the air. Joe Imbriano’s comment about Wi-Fi being forced exposure is 0:40 long and can be found at 42:20 – 43:00 in the program.
We also want to communicate some strategies parents could use to challenge their federal, state and local government officials to get them to enforce existing CA Education code that says whenever improvements are made to school facilities, the school must not introduce toxins or known carcinogens into their facilities, our children’s learning environments. RF/EMF microwave radiation from all sources (including Wi-Fi) was designated as a Class 2B carcinogen in May, 2011 by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer. (Details at http://rfemf.com). Our schools can no longer legally pump this toxic, carcinogenic substance (electricity though the air) into classrooms. Using wired connectivity instead eliminates this problem completely.
Here are several important points:
[1] The total cumulative amount of RF/EMF microwave radiation in any classroom is what really matters — radiation from all sources: routers, access point and devices.
[2] The FCC RF/EMF microwave radiation guideline is meaningless because it does not consider total cumulative radiation and only applies to one device; it does not consider the total cumulative radiation from all wireless devices in the room.
[3] Senior engineers at the FCC and OSHA have agreed, in writing, how to calculate total cumulative microwave radiation exposure from any wireless device: the peak power density measured 18″ from the device times the total number of pulses transmitted by each antenna of each wireless device over the entire school day times the length (in fractions of seconds) of the duration of each pulse. When you plug in real numbers, the totals are staggering: at least 8 times higher than the current adult maximum public exposure guideline for RF/EMF microwave radiation for every school day (http://rfemf.com/counter.html).
[4] We have a Watt problem in our country. Watts, delivered over time, is the measure of how much electricity we use. People, in general, are confused about what is a high power (many Watts) and what is low power (fractions of Watts). We falsely think that a bright 100-Watt light bulb is high power and a dim 25-Watt light bulb is low power. The truth is anything in the range of 1-150 Watts is hugely-high power compared to the electricity our bodies use every day to run our heart, our muscles, our kidneys and our brains.
Our cells operate at picoWatts or one trillionth of a Watt. Said another way it takes ten trillion picoWatts to equal 10 watts, which is the the amount of electricity our FCC guideline allows each Wi-Fi device to shoot into the air and through our children’s brains and bodies at over six million miles per hour. It is not at all surprising that electricity that is
[a] ten trillion times higher than natural levels, and that
[b] shoots through our children at over six million miles per hour
might cause their cells to misfire. You think? That’s what’s happening all day long in classrooms with wireless connectivity. Wireless connectivity creates hazardous conditions for our children.
Wi-Fi is electricity sprayed into the air at very high speeds. It is designed to penetrate through wood, concrete and our children. So if our children are allowed to get 10 watts of electricity through the air from one device, what if we have 24 devices in a classroom? That is 240 watts. Do you want 240 Watts of electricity shooting through your children’s brains and bodies, six hours a day, 180 days per year?
What are our school officials thinking? Wireless signals at the very same levels in classrooms today was used as a weapon in World War II. Our leaders and industry lobbyists just conveniently forgot about that. Apparently, it is more important to have a robust economy based on wireless signals than it is to protect our children’s brains, bodies and future fertility.
Using wired connectivity in schools to distribute our internet traffic through Ethernet wires eliminates this problem. Wired connectivity offers over 15 times higher bandwidth and much greater security at a lower cost, compared to wireless. It is a proven solution that exists today.
I hope I get a future opportunity at either KALW or some other venue to communicate these critically important points. All of us need to understand what is at stake here.”
source: http://rfemf.com/
Can this dichotomy get any more bizarre?
This photo also appeared on Pletka’s Facebook page a few months ago. Are they telling us something here?
Is this the new clothing line for the wireless generation?
Ladies and gentlemen, the agenda marches on and so do we. Happy 1 year anniversary from all of us at The Fullerton Informer and thanks for stopping by.
#1 by Anonymous on March 8, 2014 - 3:01 pm
I made the WAP-v-Switch.pdf spreadsheet exhibit from 5:15 to 5:45 pm on 1/14/14, after reviewing the details of the $748,000+ AMS.NET contract for about two hours from 2:30 am to 4:30 pm on 1/14/14 — the only time I was allowed access to the details of the contract, despite my CA Public Records request for the full contract.
I tried to highlight one glaring example during the 1/14/14 school board meeting (video of the meeting is at http://rfemf.com/evidence.html#videos) that demonstrated that the contract was wasteful, so the school board members would table the vote on the contract and bring it back on the agenda on 1/28/14, which would give the board and the public the time both needed to analyze the contract and make any needed changes.
The total cost of the Cisco/Meraki MR16 Wireless Access Point (WAP) increases over time, because it charges the school a licensing fee every three years just to run each unit. The price increase as time passes, hence the three columns. The Linksys SE2800 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch is much less expensive: it remains a one-time cost of $50.00 because it has no recurring licensing fees.
Best viewed with monospace font:
Unit Prices Year 1 Year 4 Year 7
——– ——— ———-
Meraki MR16 WAP $784.00 $1,024.81 $1,265.62
Linksys SE2800 Switch $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
The wireless access point serves more students than the wired 8-port switch, which is why I created the second set of columns and made some assumptions about numbers of users, so we could have an apples-to-apples comparison, using the mid-point price of $1,024.81 for the Meraki MR16 WAP and the $50 price for the Linksys SE2800 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:
Mbps Users Mbps/User $/User
——- ——— ———- ——
Meraki MR16 WAP 600 80 7.5 $12.81
Linksys SE2800 Switch 1000 8 125.0 $ 6.25
Note: Mbps is megabits per second, not MBps, which is Megabytes per second.
1000 Mbps = 1000/8 = 125 MBps
125 Mbps = 125/8 = 15.6 MBps (about 11 of the old 1.4 MB diskettes per second)
7.5 Mbps = 7.5/8 = 0.9 MBps (less than one old 1.4 MB diskette per second)
Conclusions
“““““`
1. On a per unit basis, the Linksys SE2800 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch already offers much more bandwidth to students (1,000 Mbps is 1.67 times more bandwidth than 600 Mbps): bandwidth that will eventually be distributed among the students.
2. On a per user basis, the Linksys SE2800 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch offers offers even more bandwidth per student (125 Mbps is 16.7 times more bandwidth than 7.5 Mbps), which is more of an apples-to-apples comparison.
3. On a per user basis, if the school district standardizes on Linksys SE2800 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet Switches, it will be spending less than half ($6.25 is 49% of $1,024.81, using the year 3 price and 39% of $15.82, using the year 7 price) and get 17 times more bandwidth per student compared to Cisco/Meraki MR16 Wireless Access Points.
This proves that wired is better than wireless because it offers much better value for greater bandwidth, much better internet security and safety for all students.
Wireless Networks Are Not Secure
““““““““““““““““
An under-appreciated aspect of wireless networks is how utterly easy it is for any predator to park his/her car in the public right of way in front of a school and capture all of the school’s traffic on the wireless network. The predators could not do this on a wired network.
Schools and school districts have a legal duty to provide a safe learning environment for its students and teachers. That means safe from internet predators as well as safe for the students’ physical health. Choosing to run wireless networks in schools compromises both. Any predator can easily park their car on the public right of ways next to any school, plug in a USB adapter to their laptop, set the packet inspection software (WildPackets, WireShark and many others) to listen in promiscuous mode and intercept all of the traffic flowing on the school’s wireless network, encrypted or not. Predators are seeking plain-text transmissions, in the sea of encrypted traffic so they can target individual log-ins, accounts and passwords. The weakest link in network security are the users. The weakest users are students. They are at the most risk.
You eliminate this risk completely if you decide to run a wired network instead.
This is all well-explained here in ‘This Week in Enterprise Tech #56’:
http://youtu.be/CaRSiaS32NU?t=51m36s –> Skip to 0:51:36 to 1:06:00
The following image from a Wildpackets product demonstration . . .
illustrates that the data traffic (and therefore the µJ/m2 from this data traffic) on wireless networks can far exceed (over 10x) the beacon signals from the WAP itself.
. . . Joe Habib, Director of Global Services at WildPackets, explains how easy it is for any third party to capture data packets from wireless networks such as those implemented by the Sonoma County Office of Education districts. This inherent insecurity of wireless networks that Joe highlights is yet another reason why schools should not run wireless networks on their campuses at all.
What’s happening in kindergartens today?
““““““““““““““““““““
On 3/7/14 @ 3:38 pm, Joe Imbriano wrote to Paul McGavin:
This is a kindergarten and this IS INSANE.
Inline image 1
Hank, those are $600+ iPads 12-18″ from 5-6 year old students who are getting exposed to 20,000+ µJ/m2 of RF/EMF microwave radiation that may permanently damage their DNA, make their blood brain barriers leak, cause reproductive harm, increase their chance of contracting cancer in 7-10 years, when they reach high school, and may sentence some of these students to a life-long allergy to electrical signals, constraining their freedoms and earning capacities throughout the rest of their lives. Yeah, I think Joe has it right. That sounds insane to me. Why? You could eliminate this problem completely by buying lower cost tablets/Chromebooks with wired connectivity options and implement a wired network instead, saving oodles of money in the process.
Apple Inc. is A Big Part of the Problem
“““““““““““““““““““`
Apple iPads offer no wired networking option since Apple has chosen not to implement the dead-simple device-to-USB-to-Ethernet function on their iPads, unlike nearly all other less-expensive tablets/laptops/NetBooks/Chromebooks in the market that offer the simple device-to-USB-to-Ethernet function.
This makes the Apple iPad the most dangerous educational product in the world for young children and the iPad represents the tail wagging the dog: the iPad is driving schools into expanding their wireless networks instead of improving the bandwidth of their existing wired networks at a much lower cost.
For the health and safety of our children, the State of CA needs to apply copious pressure on Apple computer to create a Lightning-to-USB-to-Ethernet adapter and the software driver that would enable it to work. The health of many of our children rests on this corporate decision. Where is this pressure on Apple? Encouraging/incentivizing/requiring CA schools to run only wired networks would be the bold and right thing to do — and would send a clear signal to Apple Computer to care about the safety of children.
From a health and safety perspective, streaming video to an iPad exposes users/students to 20,000+ µW/m² of RF/EMF microwave radiation within an 18-24″ radius of the device. Why? There are at least 5 hidden send/receive antennas in the iPad and students use them for longer, continuous periods of time. If the iPad offered a wired USB-to-Ethernet option, which it does not, all of this RF/EMF exposure could be avoided. Instead, select one of the other tablets, listed below, that offer a wired USB-to-Ethernet option. Here are the iPad’s hidden antenna locations:
2 antennas for cell reception: 1 in black RF/EMF strip at top and 1 attached to the LCD frame.
2 antennas for Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, 1 in Apple logo and 1 to the left of dock connector at bottom.
1 antenna for GPS antenna in black RF/EMF window across the top.
Next Steps
“““““
Let’s all wake up and realize that the continuous, voluntary, toxic pollution of RF/EMF microwave radiation is this generation’s second-hand smoke and the ConnectEd/Race to the Top/Common Core Wireless initiatives is just as bad, if not worse than marketing cigarettes to children. Do we have to wait another 7-10 years to realize our myopia? Ask yourself, how many students and teachers are already dying at premature ages in schools across the US? Have you scoured the statistics across the nation? Do you think you should before you race to put all of these children at risk?
The current ConnectEd/Common core push is a transfer of wealth from taxpayers to Apple computer and Cisco. Why are we so institutionally/culturally blinded by the shiny-bauble benefits of wireless? Can’t we think for ourselves and realize what is in front of us, data points that can easily be measured? I have more than 20 CA public records requests in front of the Petaluma City Schools District to get the public information about which wireless access points are in place/planned in the schools and what are the RF/EMF microwave radiation levels measured 18″ from these devices during typical educational activities. The school has been illegally blocking access to this public information for many months. Details at (http://rfemf.com/schools.html).