«
»

Joe Imbriano on The Richman Park Cell Tower


This entry was posted on April 18, 2016, 12:04 am and is filed under cell tower dangers, Forced irradiation of school children. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  1. #1 by AT&T- no more RF meters on February 12, 2017 - 9:42 am

    This is an awful conversation I have just read on another group:

    I saw the AT&T trucks today, the guys were working on the towers. I’ve been wanting to talk to them for months but I never get a chance to talk to them.
    So I walk over there today and just then a guy comes down and says “Hey”.
    So I said “Hey man, do you mind if I ask you some questions about the cell towers?”
    I figure there’s no way he’ll want to hear about my health concerns, so I just took the angle of the technology enthusiast and I tried to glean as much knowledge from him as I could.
    He said “Sure thing, go ahead”, real friendly.
    I then asked a bunch of technical questions about the design of the towers and stuff, just saying I was fascinated by the technology. He answered them and I learned a bunch of stuff.
    He mentioned that the round antennas are higher frequency microwaves.
    Then he said that the US is soon going to 5g, Korea (I think) is already going to 5g and “they’re ahead of us”, but that “lots of countries are holding off on 5g because of environmental concerns and health concerns”.
    I said “really?”
    He said, “Yeah, and the head of the FCC recently said ‘We’re not going to let research slow us down.'”
    I said “Wow, he said that? That’s really bold.”
    He said “Yeah I think so.”
    So I said, “Are you interested in the health concerns from this stuff?”
    “Yeah, I mean…yeah.”
    Me: Me too
    Him: Really? Lots of us in this line of work are getting leukemia and cancer.
    Me: I’ve been interested in it for a while because I work here, so close to two towers.
    Him: They used to turn off the transmitters when we worked on them. Now they refuse to turn off the transmitters while we work on them and they don’t let us carry around a meter anymore. They’ve got transmitters on top of buildings now-
    Me: -Yeah I’ve seen them!
    Him: Yeah! You know the Maxwell House Hotel? I was just up there. And you just walk right up to them.
    Me: Really? Man you’re right in front of those things!
    Him: Yeah, and they’re not turning them off anymore. I’m just getting blasted.
    Me: I’ve got a meter and I get readings at this school of 10-20 mW/cm2 per channel. And a cell tower has like 70 channels right?
    Him: You have a RF meter? (He couldn’t believe it).
    Me: Yeah! I drive around town and see what the levels are like.
    Him: No way, eBay? Amazon?
    Me: Amazon.
    Him: How much was it?
    Me: Like… $190.
    Him: No way… Like I said, they forbid us from having them now.
    Me: So I just looked up the federal limits on Saturday. It says the federal limit is 10mW/cm2. On this playground I’ve gotten a reading of 15mW/cm2 on one channel… but the cell tower puts out 70 something channels, does that mean it’s putting out roughly 15×70 mW/cm2?
    Him: Most likely, yeah. Yeah all of us are worried about it. It’s high enough levels to heat things up. My face burns whenever I use a cellphone.
    Me: Everybody at the school is always hot, even when the air is cold.
    (Note: radiant heat [long wave light] heats up a body without heating up air).
    Him: Really? The industry people are actually worried that 5g is going to have a really big, even more noticeable thermal presence because the high frequencies have so much more power in them.
    (His phone started ringing).
    Me: Great talking to you!
    Him: You too! See ya!’

    Reply Quote
1 2
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!