Is Matt Leslie an Agenda 21 denying, Population reduction supporter and radical environmentalist?

Meet Matt Leslie who wants you to stop having children and leave the earth to the animals, taking us back to the time of the Dinosaurs before people were here.


He is a card carrying Green Party big wheel in Fullerton.

Matt, along with his sidekick, card carrying Green Party member Jane Rands, have some very interesting things to say or not to say about Joe Imbriano and our community.

 Matthew Leslie “They aren’t everyone’s dream (single family homes)…, but I do enjoy mine (no BBQ). I think there should be a place for apartments, rental or not, but if people really have a problem with this much building, I suggest that we decide what makes a livable, healthy community. Also, stop having children.”

 Matt Leslie:  Who is “we” that should decide a “livable, healthy community”?  Is that you and is your definition of this to limit or deny people the right to have children?  Or, do you think that elected officials have the right to make these decisions for people, based on their personal definition of “livable” and “healthy”?  First of all, you have taken a position that points to children as being a problem.  Really?  On what basis do you assert this conclusion to “stop having children”?
Per the WSJ, citing The National Center for Health Statistics:  “The general fertility rate fell in 2015 to tie the lowest level on record. Fertility, defined as the number of live births per 1,000 women ages 15-44, has never been lower than the rate recorded last year and in 2013.

Clearly, the facts and stats do not support your assertions, which begs the question on why you are identifying children as a problem.  Many understand the U.N. document, Agenda 21, to require a 95% reduction in global population.  Do you agree with reducing the world population by 95%, Matt?

Before you point to children as the problem and tell people to stop having children, perhaps you should understand the facts and history.  Above all, you should have respect for the reproductive rights of others.

You are, plainly, anti-children and that is your prerogative.  Imposing your personal choice on others by telling them to “stop having children” is totalitarian and denying others their rights.  No one has this right.

Matt likes to make a mockery out of my articles exposing the facts that moon landings were totally faked and that the shape of the earth is not some spinning ball that the water never flies off of. He likes to make fun of what the school districts are doing to the children with wireless radiation while his sidekick just sits back, ignores it all, pokes fun at it, denies it all and sits back lets it all happen while she focuses on bike lanes and the cactus in Coyote Hills. Matt also likes to make fun of my articles on the other facets of Agenda 21 like Geoengineering and forced vaccinations. Matt is an Agenda 21 and eugenics denier as well. Perhaps that is because he supports eugenics and population reduction policies like the Green political party he shills for in Fullerton does.


Fullerton’s Greenest of the Greenies Matt Leslie


Matthew Leslie I don’t understand why someone needs to cite a global conspiracy to explain developers making money.”

I believe the dark underbelly of this team of leftist radical environmentalists needs to be exposed . The issues I have raised such as the geoengineered drought, the proliferation of microwave systems and wireless infrastructure sitings are well within the purview of the City Council and in terms of public health and welfare, are very significant. Matt and Jane have remained silent for years on these issues and have reared their heads lately making fun of these issues. Leaders lead and don’t just carry their little safe political football issues. Obviously, these are not leaders folks.

Unfortunately, their green solutions comprise ignoring the plight of the children while expanding government and increasing taxes. The truth of the matter is, Matt Leslie and Jane Rands would be willing to give the government unlimited power as long as the government gives them what they want and is run by a bunch of left-wing environmental loonies. They want their version of socialism, you know the one that works for them.

The greenies are only upset with government if it is not following the policies that they want, but could care less about protecting individual freedoms, They put the misdiagnosed health of the planet on top of the rights of people. they put their ideology, radical environmentalism, and their type socialism in front of the individuals’ rights or freedoms. That is what the greenies are really all about.

For years Matt has mocked the undeniable fact that microwaves are harmful. His partner in Green, Jane Rands, a repeat contender for The Fullerton City Council has COMPLETELY ignored this and other serious issues while refusing to respond to multiple pieces of correspondence she had been sent relating to the issues of wireless infrastructure sitings as well as the other disasters taking place in the environment, like geo engineering and the microwaving of children and wildlife. Jane has been so dedicated to peripheral municipal issues over the years and yet drives her car right past the biggest and most serious issues of our time. This is inexcusable, in my opinion. She is no different than the rest of the corrupt politicians running our city.

What is more deplorable for both of them is that they keep trying to make fun of these issues that we are exposing. Matt and Jane continue, along with the rest of Fullerton’s phony establishment sycophant denier’s club in town, to keep trying desperately try to pigeon hole me into a conspiracy theorist while the children along with the rest of our community undeniably remain in harm’s way.

Jane Rands and Matt Leslie have been in attendance at countless meetings where scientific studies and evidence have been presented and entered into the public record right in front of them by myself and others, including research concluding wireless microwave radiation in the schools is part of a sterilization agenda and that cell towers cause cancer. Jane will not be running for office again for a long time as the fifth time at failure would probably be the last. Maybe she and Matt will finally listen to the voters. But will they listed to the evidence or the truth? Perhaps their worldview is incompatible with ours? You know the kind that likes to get married and have a family?

Jane’s direct connection to the Fullerton Observer even further implicates her in this disaster as they too have a hand in covering up these agendas aimed at humanity like geoengineering, disarming all of us,  forced wireless exposure, water fluoridation, and forced vaccinations.

Now I believe it becomes evidently clear why Matt Leslie and Jane Rands have, for years and years, totally ignored these and other issues facing our community including the dire situation of the Fullerton school children with respect to the forced classroom microwave exposure, the autism connection and the agenda to reduce the population as evidenced by my articles on the subject.

It is no secret that Matt Leslie is the Fullerton contact for the Green Party.

Well, here are truths on the Green Party that members in good standing, Mr. Leslie and Ms. Rands, apparently both hold to be self evident.

The origins of the Green Party are steeped deeply in Eugenics and Euthanasia. The Green Party’s origins lie with the document ‘Blue Print for Survival‘; signatory (among others) Julian Huxley, eugenicist (selective human breeding), member of the British Eugenics Society, Fellow of the Royal Society.

The Blueprint was signed by over thirty of the leading scientists of the day—including Sir Julian Huxley, Sir Frank Fraser Darling, Sir Peter Medawar, and Sir Peter Scott

The Green Party was originally formed as PEOPLE, or the Ecology Party, in Coventry in 1973, with the first edition of Manifesto for a Sustainable Society as the party’s statement of philosophy and policies. This document was inspired by Blueprint for Survival, published by The Ecologist (then edited by Edward Goldsmith). The party changed its name to become the Green Party in the 1980s

Julian Huxley and euthanasia:
….on this pro-euthanasia board was: Sidney Goldstein who sat on the American Birth Control League’s National Council and later was on Planned Parenthood’s Board of Directors. Another member was Frank H. Hankins who was a managing editor for Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger’s newsletter called the Birth Control Review. Hankins was also an American Eugenics Society member. Another more famous name who was sat on the advisory board of this pro-euthanasia panel, was Julian Huxley, who was a later recipient of a Planned Parenthood award.

Aldous Huxley (who wrote ‘Brave New World’ and brother of Julian Huxley) is linked to the ‘teens and toddlers sustainability replication programme’ (eugenics education programme) now in UK schools.

Julian Huxley and Prince Philip have both been with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) launched at the Royal Society for the Arts (and hence of the John Adam St Gang also known as the Committee of 300, or the Olympians

The Green Party and Euthanasia
The Green Party in Tasmania has twice tried to legislate for voluntary euthanasia.
Nick McKim is leader of the Tasmanian Greens Party, the world’s first Green party…..Nick was also the first member of any Australian parliament to introduce marriage equality legislation to Parliament, and has twice attempted to legislate for voluntary euthanasia. [11]

Greens Leader Bob Brown says he will again try to overturn a ban that prevents the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory passing laws allowing euthanasia.

The Victorian Green Party is now looking for the law reform commission to legislate for euthanasia (April 2015)
A Greens bid to get Victoria’s Law Reform Commission to examine euthanasia has been delayed. Party leaders in the state’s upper house agreed to not vote on the motion after it looked like it would fail. But the Greens say a vote will be held in May on whether the commission should report on euthanasia laws.
New Zealand Herald: Beware the policy of the dangerous Greens ‘the Green Party in Germany has similar policies’ (December 2011)

The Green Party in Canada tables resolution on euthanasia, March 2009 [15]

Previous legislation in the Northern Territory regarding euthanasia laws:

The Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 (NT) was a controversial law legalising euthanasia, passed by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory of Australia in 1995, but effectively nullified in 1997 by the Federal Parliament. Dr Philip Nitschke, the first doctor in the world to administer legal, voluntary euthanasia, founded Exit International in response to the overturning of the Act.
While voluntary euthanasia had previously been condoned officially in the Netherlands and the US state of Oregon, the act was the first time that a legislative assembly passed a law explicitly legalising euthanasia.

The leader of the Green Party in Canada, Elizabeth May, has called for population reduction.


Jane and Matt are both card carrying green party members who categorically deny the dangers of microwave radiation posed to our children in our schools. Both Matt and Jane are also GEO ENGINEERING deniers as well. Now Matt comes forward with his telling position about how people need to stop having children.

Since when is it up to Matt to decide if there too many children? Should the government control the number of children people have?

Has Matt ever flown across the United States are realized that 95 percent of the US is rural open space and that we will never run out of land?

Fullerton does not need Agenda 21 denying, population reduction pushing radical left wing environmentalists on its Council unless of course, you agree with them.

I certainly cannot come to terms with such a truly dangerous ideology.



, ,

  1. #1 by Mary on November 19, 2016 - 9:44 pm

    These folks live in a Green Party bubble: no children, no cars, no private property, no people, . . .

    At the same time they deny the destruction that chemtrails and wireless radiation are wreaking on the environment and all living organisms. That doesn’t make sense.

    Tell me, again, why Jane Rands ran for city council?

  2. #2 by Fullerton Lover on November 20, 2016 - 3:37 pm

    Focused on trying to save Coyote Hills from being developed by the people that own it by using the Fullerton money to pay for it.

    I think we have A LOT more pressing needs for the children of Fullerton than helping a bunch of NIMBYs create a “park”, which is actually a nice way of saying the residents around Coyote Hills want the rest of the fools in Fullerton to pay for this land so that it can never be developed and will increase their property values and enhance their quality of life.

    Funny how they don’t mind squeezing even MORE people in like rats with high density housing south of Chapman to accomplish this, and the Fullerton establishment is always looking for ways to create LESS development north of Chapman?

    Class warfare in Fullerton at it’s finest.

  3. #3 by quote from Matt Leslie on March 9, 2017 - 9:06 am

    Matthew Leslie “Fuck their housing goals. Are we supposed to just keep building residences until people breed our species to catastrophic levels?”

    • #4 by Anonymous on March 10, 2017 - 8:07 pm

      Who is this “Matt Leslie” person? Is he a scientist?

      • #5 by Anonymous on March 19, 2017 - 7:05 pm

        Matt is ignorant and naive and attends most of the city council meetings as if it were his hobby. He denies the problems we are facing which are the real catastrophes, preferring to go after people for having children.

        No, he is no scientist.

(will not be published)

Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved. is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!