«
»

Hilda Sugarman’s dystopic vision of wireless iPads: Every single child will have one 24/7


Hilda Sugarman, a member of the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees, “My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7,” Sugarman said about iPad use. “

The dangers of microwave radiation have been known for decades. The dangers of the wrong people in positions of authority have been known for millenia. 

Wireless dangers have been thoroughly presented to the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees for the better part of over a year now. 

There are well over 20,000 research papers written on the effects of RF/EMF radiation according to John Osepchuck, PhD the chair of IEEE/ASTM and the the biological effects have been known since the 1920s.

HERE ARE FIVE THOUSAND MORE ON ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION AND FIELDS:

http://www.justproveit.net/content/studies

FSD’s very own Hilda Sugarman in the Orange County Register.

My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7,” Sugarman said about iPad use.

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/school-601588-technology-ipad.htmln

This woman along with the rest of  https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-fullerton-five/  have chosen to make receiving a public education in The Fullerton School District conditional upon being continuously forcibly irradiated with pulse modulated microwave wireless radiation at levels trillions of times the normal background levels that we and our ancestors were exposed to as children. I guess in her infinite wisdom, forced exposure at school is not enough. It appears that our very own Dr. Strangelove is pushing for it 24/7.  

These wireless classrooms are loaded with upwards of 30-40 of these wireless devices that emit as much or more pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation than in use cell phones.

https://thefullertoninformer.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/

Nowhere on earth does this environment exist in terms of the levels of wireless microwave radio frequency electromagnetic radiation exposure, except perhaps the Operating Room where Roman Schulze spent much of his adult life. One, however, must consider the age of subjects being exposed being exclusively young, developing children, having the distance to the source of the emissions approaching zero in almost all cases, the duration of constant exposure in terms of it being chronic, as well as the sheer number of transmitters present in such close quarters. 

1.13509_G3520249-Laboratory_rats-SPL

 

I won’t even get into the lighting, the magnetic fields from the HVAC units on the roof, the indoor air quality and the forced vaccinations. Those are all important but Hilda http://www.fulltech.org/#!hilda-sugarman/zoom/c8zl/image1ig8 seems to have the hots for wireless so we will attempt to stay focused on that for now.  

How can this be safe for children crammed in these rooms all day? It has to be safe because a trillion dollar industry and their bought and paid for scientists and experts say it is.

 http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/269120/mobile_phone_study_covered_up.html

https://thefullertoninformer.com/junk-science-7030-with-some-wireless-industry-dough-gets-you-5050-and-our-kids-the-shaft-in-the-wireless-classrooms/

It has to be safe because the establishment worshipers say that it is:

https://thefullertoninformer.com/public-health-is-not-a-sport-dont-play-games-with-our-childrens-health/

It has to be because Simon Says

images (5)

 

Yes folks, these school district lackeys have been sold a bill of goods with your tax dollars and Hilda Sugarman wants your kid to have an iPad 24/7.

The sickening reality is these school required devices are the gateways to other addictions that you are in total denial of as we speak, in addition to the radiation health concerns.  Do you really want your kid addicted to and staring at these things all day while it irradiates their brains and reproductive organs at school and under their pillow at night while setting the state for macular degeneration from staring at back lit screens all the time.  Infertility Pads I mean iPads and wireless devices are constantly emitting a potential human carcinogen called wireless microwave radiation.

Did the school district ever go over the safety warnings with you at any of the meetings?  No Pletka says “….totally safe for the children..” https://thefullertoninformer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/wireless.doc-3.pdf Yeah, I thought so.

Yup, we now have upwards of 15,000 young children who are in the district with no waiver, no opt out and no options. To be or not to be exposed, that is the question. 8536213

https://thefullertoninformer.com/is-this-your-child/

So you have five choices as a parent:

1) You can listen to Pletka, Hilda, the rest of the Fullerton Five, the trillion dollar wireless industry, or Roman Schulze, and go along with the 24/7 iPad routine.

2) You can stand up to the district and its servile minions and demand that they stop irradiating your children.

3) You can sell your new car, your home, quit your job, or dole out some serious dough and home school your child.

4) You can search high and low all over the country to find a private school that is not irradiating the students like the the FSD is. Good luck on that one.

5) OR-you can call me a nut job, a conspiracy theorist, a junk science purveyor, a fear monger, and while you are at it, feel free to assign me any other derogatory implication as a vicarious appeasement to your conscience and keep your kids exposed in these classrooms while you find a fertility doctor and an insurance plan that will cover in Vitro for your children.

You see the choice is yours. Sadly the choice is not your child’s.

Wireless microwave radiation is a class 2B carcinogen:

Here is a list of some class 2B carciongens.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IARC_Group_2B_carcinogens

Polymeric, prepared as thin smooth films (with the exception of poly(glycolic acid))
Metallic, prepared as thin smooth films
Metallic cobalt, metallic nickel and an alloy powder containing 66-67% nickel, 13-16% chromium and 7% iron

Mixtures[edit]

Can you imagine if your mom or dad FORCED YOU TO BE CHRONICALLY EXPOSED FOR YOUR ENTIRE CHILDHOOD TO ANY OF THESE WHILE YOU WERE GROWING UP?

Inquiring minds want to know, how this woman, being married to a medical doctor, could make such a despotically arrogant statement? Has she lost her mind? Is she drunk on wireless?   There are thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies that show harm. The wireless industry is several trillion dollars now. Obama wants to irradiate the entire US school system with Connect-Ed. Looks like with her project inkwell connections, she thinks she is in the car.

Ladies and gentlemen, the road to hell may be paved with good intentions but based on the behavior of the school board in this town, I wouldn’t even give them that much.

The alleged health affects that wireless causes are not my assertions, they are the assertions of medical and scientific experts.

http://wifiinschools.com/

What have we become where we willingly hand over our children to a forced irradiation babysitting program and collectively turn our backs on decades of scientific research jeopardizing an entire generation just so we can keep our new cars, enjoy our free time during the day and get our nails done? The next time you drive by us on the sidewalk outside your school with our banner, ponder these things. Pletka can fundamentally reject all the studies, science and common sense all he wants and Hilda can wish for 24/7 iPad exposure till the cows come home. We will not rest until we end the largest forced irradiation program of school children that the world has ever known.

May God help us ladies and gentlemen. 

This entry was posted on April 16, 2014, 7:18 am and is filed under Forced irradiation of school children. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  1. #1 by Anonymous on April 17, 2014 - 7:43 am

    In light of all the information and peer reviewed science, I find Hilda Sugarman’s “24/7” proclamation obscene and a criminal assault on the FSD children.

    Reply Quote

    • #2 by just think for a moment on April 18, 2014 - 12:29 pm

      Joe, Hilda Sugarman is not solely responsible. Do not forget about the other school board members, principals as well as the administrative staff in the District office. They COULD say no to this. Bear in mind that science doesn’t come easy for most. It is rather confusing and difficult for many of us. Decisions are made only after consulting with the experts in their respective fields. In this case, they are all being told repeatedly that it is safe from a variety of trusted sources.

      The problem lies in our society’s politically correct leanings where discord is frowned upon regardless of who or what is at stake.

      Obscene? Perhaps. Criminal assault? One could argue in favor of or against that position. Is there intent? That is the real question. I think she just royally screwed up in her off the cuff comment when she was just really trying to express her enthusiasm over something she really believes the kids need.

      You are in a tough spot Joe. This is a really hard sell. No one dares believe the schools are purposely harming children even though you have appeared to clearly demonstrate that they could very well be.

      While I tend to agree with your assertions, you have a real uphill battle ahead. I wish you the best. You are a very courageous and determined individual. Looks like you are doing this for all the right reasons that most still can’t seem to grasp. Just be patient and be careful.

      Cheers.

      Quote

    • #3 by Joe Imbriano on April 18, 2014 - 11:47 pm

      Thank you for your post. Everyone is in this basket but Pletka and Hilda have the season tickets. Hilda is the only one, who in addition to IGNORING EVERYTHING SHE HAS BEEN PRESENTED WITH, has insolently uttered her darkest desire-24/7 iPad exposure. I don’t doubt for a minute that she meant what she said.

      They have all been briefed that everything is perfectly safe, much like they were years ago by a huge industry that put the ashtrays in the hospitals, planes, trains and teachers lounges for years. The reality was ignored until the cemeteries overflowed. She is in too deep to do the right thing so all she can do is dig deeper. She has chosen to look the other way for over a year while the piles of studies she has been provided with and chose to ignore stacked up would reach the ceiling. In my opinion, that coupled with her million dollar statement is simply despotic arrogance.

      I knew this would be rough when I launched, but to ignore this would be criminal.I believe that the schools are harming the children and the Fullerton School District is in a very unique position. They have been intensely lobbied and forcibly exposed to this information for over a year. What have they done? They keep stepping on the gas. Please don’t confuse being politically correct with denying the potential for endangering school children.

      Thank you for your empathy, your concerns and your support. People will eventually wake up. The question is, will it be too late?

      Cheers to you as well.

      Quote

    • #4 by Resign on April 21, 2014 - 9:01 am

      1. Schools boards should never be able to make this very, very critical health decision. They should recognize this and choose a known, safe alternative: wired technology. If they are not successful with their fellow board members in convincing them to use wired tech, they should IMMEDIATELY RESIGN from their board positions. If these trustees had any integrity, common decency, or common sense they would know that this decision is way beyond their ken and they would never be a part of this. By definition, wireless classroom exposure harms the children and teachers.

      2. This is a complete collapse of public safeguards. The regulations do not exist at the policy level and, as a result, the decisions are being driven down to the lowest governing bodies: the local school boards. This is a complete collapse of the integrity and worth of every level of government, colleges of public health and public policy and any other entity that purports to care for the health and safety of our children and teachers.

      Quote

    • #5 by Fullerton parent on April 21, 2014 - 10:51 am

      She believes she is doing the right thing just like you believe you are doing the right thing. So how would you like it it someone started posting insulting and defamatory information about you and your family?

      Quote

    • #6 by Bozo Esq. on April 21, 2014 - 11:57 am

      Is there any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person’s reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person?

      Nothing defamatory here, just opinions as well as facts. When you hold a public office, it is a forgone conclusion that public scrutiny and criticism come with the territory.

      Quote

    • #7 by Parent??????? on April 21, 2014 - 12:58 pm

      “She believes she is doing the right thing”

      When you ignore all information contrary to your ‘belief’ and your ‘belief’ is harming THOUSANDS of children, there is no excuse, none whatsoever.

      If criticism and condemnation of her statement is insulting, so be it.

      You are a “parent” that is in favor of irradiating the children and teachers? Do you want the children to have these devices 24/7, also?

      Quote

    • #8 by Angie B on April 21, 2014 - 2:13 pm

      How would you like it if public school was only made available to those willing to accept mandatory irradiation and by someone that was guided by their ‘beliefs’? Everyone should be rest assured because one person believes it to be so?

      Quote

    • #9 by Joe Imbriano on April 21, 2014 - 10:08 pm

      I’ve heard over and over again from the compromised ones that they wish us all to take “soft”, “non aggressive” stances on this issue. They intend to direct the discussion down the wrong roads into diversionary territory. These terms are mere characterizations that hide the real agenda. They’re usually advocating our refraining from stating the fact that xenobiotic RF radiation in one context or another is positively harmful.

      Since it is true that xenobiotic RFR is harmful, saying so can never be defamatory.

      Saying that a public official has repeatedly refused to stop and has continued to deploy upon children the use of a harmful agent in schools is likewise a true and a non defamatory statement. I have also suggested that the act of doing so is also possibly illegal.

      Welcome to The United States Fullerton Parent. How much time did you spend in North Korea?

      Quote
1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 20
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!