No, sorry Charlie, no cigar.
We over at The Fullerton Informer, instead, like to refer to all of her on camera derogatory implications as “inconvenient truths”, “advocacy for children’s health protected by the first amendment”, and “stepping on the exposed toes of those who aimlessly appear to walk what we believe to be a dangerous party line”.
You know, it isn’t often that a school board member comes unglued on camera over comments questioning the magnetic north of their moral compass. I believe that is exactly what we had take place at the latest meeting of the minds on 12-17-13 up at The Glendale Unified School District’s Board of Trustees meeting over the wireless classroom discussion. It kind of seemed to me that Ms. Boger’s was spinning around as she appeared to defend the trio presenting how WiFi is safe, ignoring all of the information she has been presented with, including, but not limited to the microwave transmitter in the lap business that I emailed her. Yes, she proceeded to shake it in her hot little hand as she stared right into my camera while rebuking a parent’s critique of her behavior in this whole forced irradiation exposure of school children that is quickly turning into a debacle.
I couldn’t help but notice how misinformed she appeared to be while she smugly referred to the World Health Organization’s classification process of class 2B carcinogens as “exacting“ and yet in the same bizarre diatribe chose to poke fun at some of the things on that list as if they had no business being on that list. She appeared to be insinuating that some of the items on the WHO class 2B list, were in actuality, safe as they are or were regularly used by her mother and husband. Was she provided with the entire list like the one I read here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IARC_Group_2B_carcinogens.
It all begins around 2:35:05 http://gusd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=142#sthash.TjXJx4zw.dpuf and ends around 2:38:00 as she attempts to seal the fate of the children in the GUSD. I have better footage and close ups that will be released at a later date. For now, we will use GUSD’s archived feed.
While she began ranting and raving about how many degrees off she and the others are accused of being, the real real irony here becomes evident when she was calling us bullies, fear mongers and purveyors of junk science. Amazingly as she really got hot under the collar on her little soap box, she was actually holding in her hot little hand the so called junk science that was actually excerpts from and links to peer reviewed scientific studies and material, that she appeared to shake and and treat like a piece of trash.
Here is the link to what she was clutching http://wifidangers.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/ that clearly warns against the very thing she is adamant about forcing on the children. I bet she didn’t even read it! I believe that it clearly spells out that IPads emit more radiation than cell phones and that studies involving long term use, looking past a ten year window, kind of like any kid’s mandatory stint in the GUSD’s K-12 system, showed an increased cancer risk in ADULTS! Of course our concern deals with children where there are NO studies and primarily with their prospects of suffering reproductive harm.
Goodness gracious could we have made our points any clearer? Can we? You bet and we will five minutes at a time for the rest of her term on that board, however long that will be. Sparks were flying and rightfully so.
Like a mother down in Fullerton so eloquently stated, the FSD trustees have appeared to ignore the most significant issue they have ever had decision making power over. Will those in The GUSD? Stay tuned.
#1 by Ray on December 24, 2013 - 3:46 pm
It appeared from the video as if none of them really did any research. It made me sick that they were asking such basic questions. It made me sicker that they were given such misleading answers by their support staff.
For example: EMF’s. Yes all electric and electronic devices emit EMF’s, but they are not all the same.
For Boger to confuse Christmas lights with microwave radiation was, well – absolutely pathetic. On the other hand, she was mislead.
What these school board members fail to grasp is that microwave radiation is extremely harmful, and that the levels emitted by these devices are off the chart.
#2 by Anonymous on December 26, 2013 - 9:22 am
This is a health decision and should never be left in the hands of school boards to decide.
This debate should never be going on at this level.
#3 by amateur night on December 26, 2013 - 9:09 am
shes a tool
#4 by 33 degrees of separation on December 26, 2013 - 2:50 pm
It is by design, in the hands of the inept.
#5 by Chantel on December 26, 2013 - 3:59 pm
In Spokane, we have the same problem. The board members won’t look at the information,ignore the information and then act like they are experts. They act as if none of this is real. I just don’t understand. Are they all getting their marching orders from the same people?
The behavior is very bizarre. It is hard to describe as it is not something that I have ever dealt with before. The school officials are the same way. They used to be very nice and courteous. Now, everything has changed since this was brought up.