No, sorry Charlie, no cigar.
We over at The Fullerton Informer, instead, like to refer to all of her on camera derogatory implications as “inconvenient truths”, “advocacy for children’s health protected by the first amendment”, and “stepping on the exposed toes of those who aimlessly appear to walk what we believe to be a dangerous party line”.
You know, it isn’t often that a school board member comes unglued on camera over comments questioning the magnetic north of their moral compass. I believe that is exactly what we had take place at the latest meeting of the minds on 12-17-13 up at The Glendale Unified School District’s Board of Trustees meeting over the wireless classroom discussion. It kind of seemed to me that Ms. Boger’s was spinning around as she appeared to defend the trio presenting how WiFi is safe, ignoring all of the information she has been presented with, including, but not limited to the microwave transmitter in the lap business that I emailed her. Yes, she proceeded to shake it in her hot little hand as she stared right into my camera while rebuking a parent’s critique of her behavior in this whole forced irradiation exposure of school children that is quickly turning into a debacle.
I couldn’t help but notice how misinformed she appeared to be while she smugly referred to the World Health Organization’s classification process of class 2B carcinogens as “exacting“ and yet in the same bizarre diatribe chose to poke fun at some of the things on that list as if they had no business being on that list. She appeared to be insinuating that some of the items on the WHO class 2B list, were in actuality, safe as they are or were regularly used by her mother and husband. Was she provided with the entire list like the one I read here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IARC_Group_2B_carcinogens.
It all begins around 2:35:05 http://gusd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=142#sthash.TjXJx4zw.dpuf and ends around 2:38:00 as she attempts to seal the fate of the children in the GUSD. I have better footage and close ups that will be released at a later date. For now, we will use GUSD’s archived feed.
While she began ranting and raving about how many degrees off she and the others are accused of being, the real real irony here becomes evident when she was calling us bullies, fear mongers and purveyors of junk science. Amazingly as she really got hot under the collar on her little soap box, she was actually holding in her hot little hand the so called junk science that was actually excerpts from and links to peer reviewed scientific studies and material, that she appeared to shake and and treat like a piece of trash.
Here is the link to what she was clutching http://wifidangers.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/ that clearly warns against the very thing she is adamant about forcing on the children. I bet she didn’t even read it! I believe that it clearly spells out that IPads emit more radiation than cell phones and that studies involving long term use, looking past a ten year window, kind of like any kid’s mandatory stint in the GUSD’s K-12 system, showed an increased cancer risk in ADULTS! Of course our concern deals with children where there are NO studies and primarily with their prospects of suffering reproductive harm.
Goodness gracious could we have made our points any clearer? Can we? You bet and we will five minutes at a time for the rest of her term on that board, however long that will be. Sparks were flying and rightfully so.
Like a mother down in Fullerton so eloquently stated, the FSD trustees have appeared to ignore the most significant issue they have ever had decision making power over. Will those in The GUSD? Stay tuned.
#1 by JGarrison on December 23, 2013 - 6:23 pm
Parents & Community V. School Boards
These school boards have been left with decision making responsibility for something that they have neither the background nor expertise to decide. These are not decisions about whether to serve whole or 2% milk at the cafeteria. They are major health decisions that can have life-changing consequences for the children and teachers: cancer, infertility, ADHD, autism, cardiovascular issues, to name a few. Anyone knows that school boards should never be making these types of decisions.
So, in going about their task of deciding, information is brought before them to make a determination. Is there consistency in the quality, amount, type, funding origin, or perspective of this information? No, as each school board accepts the roll out of wireless classrooms, their process for this decision is unique. Depending on the district’s population there may be no opposition for the plain reason that people are generally ignorant of WiFi health harms. School boards are making these decisions one-by-one, with no consistency in the integrity of the data. Each school board will try to reason why WiFi is OK, bringing it into their own personal experience. Because it doesn’t get hot to the touch, it’s OK. Because I haven’t heard there are health issues from wireless radiation, it’s OK. Because it fits within FCC guidelines, it’s OK. Because I don’t hear about it in the news, it’s OK. Because it is all over the place, it’s OK.
Meanwhile, you have parents and community that have stumbled upon information that all says wireless radiation is very, very harmful to our children. Every week there is new information attesting to the harms. WHO scientist Dr. Anthony Miller has come out and said that if they were label wireless radiation today that it would be classified as a Class 2A probable human carcinogen. So, it probably causes cancer. The information and studies continue to accumulate. As a parent, you can’t help but fight this and there is something wrong with you if you don’t.
The oft referred to FCC guidelines are 17 years old and do not take into account non thermal biological effects. These guidelines do not protect us, but board members point to them and use them to substantiate their decisions.
In making these critical decisions, they are trampling all over the rights of the parents and, incredibly, they have convinced themselves that they have the right to do that. They are risking the health of our children and they have no right to do so.
Evaluating the safety of wireless radiation emissions should never be decided by a school board, they don’t have the expertise to do so. Because the FCC can’t or won’t do their job of protecting us, the decision should be based on the Precautionary Principle which states that when there is an absence of scientific consensus you err on the side of caution. They should all recognize that this decision should not rest with them.
So, now you have school boards fighting with the parents . . . .