Archive for category radiation experiments on school children

Public Health is Not a Sport Doc. Don’t Play Games With Our Children’s Health.

images (8)

ONE YEAR LATER AND OUR CHILDREN STILL DESERVE BETTER!

When learning of the issue of WiFi and wireless device health impacts, one of the first thoughts that often cross our minds is: “This can’t be possible that WiFi and these devices are harmful. Surely some governmental or health agency would have prevented this from happening.”

For many of us it just doesn’t make sense, because we assume that they couldn’t be that bad, otherwise “they” would have stopped it. One of the hardest things to realize is that many individuals, groups, and entities are actively blocking the public from learning about very serious health impacts affecting their communities from wireless technology.

 Why would people do this? Don’t they realize that they are hurting their own children? Parents are busy, and they can’t spend hours upon hours doing scientific research. They therefore tend to base their decision on information that they consider trustworthy. Perhaps they will go on the web and read an article or two, or they will visit the World Health Organization’s website and read up. Not surprisingly, the most common approach is to ask someone who has a medical background, namely a nurse or doctor. In seems that in every school in which parents bring forth the issue of WiFi and wireless device health risks, certain figures manage to appear who will do everything in their power to block the process, and will fight tooth and nail to insist that wireless technology stays, even if it means presenting distorted and or false information to their communities. Usually this is a tech-savvy school board member, a technological integration specialist, or someone whose motivation is borne of his infatuation with gadgets. Sometimes it’s a school board member who doesn’t want the children to be left behind.

In Fullerton California, it’s a medical doctor named Dr. Roman Schulze. Read the rest of this entry »

168 Comments

ZINA ON THE FENCE-AGAIN

Folks trying to get Zina Gleason’s positions on issues has been, let’s just say, a tad difficult, especially when it comes to what I believe to be the crown jewel of this election- CARRYING OVER THE FORCED CLASSROOM WIRELESS MICROWAVE RADIATION EXPOSURE MODEL FROM THE FSD INTO THE HIGH SCHOOLS. She won’t answer any emails and deletes Facebook posts containing questions about the wireless issue.

So why is it that she appears to love the fence so much?

unnamed (5)

 Why does she love many fences like the bond loving fence?

unnamed (4)

Read the rest of this entry »

6 Comments

Fawley’s follies-The Union Puppet and the union hacks on the front lines

 

10710523_771997239513270_2133561865895612630_n

Nuff already with this union puppet

There is a strange phenomenon taking place where the red Fawley signs go up. The opponents signs go down. Fawley is a union trifecta while she makes no bones about it being all in the family.

images (24)

Here is what I think about your questions Mr. Imbriano-Fawley ignores multiple emails on wireless safety

She openly supports the irresponsible Read the rest of this entry »

11 Comments

SDSU BRAIN CANCER CLUSTER – UCSD BREAST CANCER CLUSTER – CARLSBAD CANCER CLUSTER

By Virgina Farver
Thank you for sharing this with our readers Virginia.

<>PROW CELL TOWERS/ SDSU BRAIN CANCER CLUSTER

To Whom it May Concern:
I would like to respond to the installations of PROW cell towers in L.A., and wanted to share my Story with you. I lost my Beautiful, YOUNG Son from Glioblastoma Multiforme Brain Cancer on October 11, 2008. Rich, had attended SDSU ( San Diego State University ) ,and was working and living in San Diego at the time of diagnosis. Diagnosis was March 14th, 2008 and Rich, lived just shy of 7 months. Dr. Verjesh Tantuwaya told the family that his cell phone was the culprit. Tumor location was in the right frontal lobe, and he was right handed -Ispwerlateral.
August 7, 2009 while at home in Colorado I found articles and a video about a,’ Brain Cancer Cluster on the SDSU campus.’ I’ll put the links below, and Rich is the graduate student these are referring too. I immediately started to contact the SDSU Administration and found this
to be futile. I then drove out to San Diego, staying the whole month of October 2009. I met with Professors Nancy Speckmann ( Rich, was her TA ) and Farid Abdel-Nour off campus for meetings. Both Professors told me that my Son spent long hours in Nasatir Hall, ROOM 131 (where most of the brain cancer victims were located ). I was told that my Son would meet with students in this room, study and grade papers, even on weekends.

After arriving back home the SDSU Administration had sent me an Epidemiological Report written by a Dr. Thomas Mack. 3rd paragraph of this report he mentions that he has,’ No known knowledge of chemical or radiation concerns and therefore are none.’ I e-mailed Dr. Mack and he called me at home. I asked him about a specific Cell Tower that is directly outside of Nasatir Hall, and room 131. Dr. Mack denied this could be the cause and SDSU BRAIN CANCER CLUSTER – UCSD BREAST CANCER CLUSTER – CARLSBAD CANCER CLUSTER

I immediately started to contact the SDSU Administration and found this to be futile. I then drove out to San Diego, staying the whole month of October 2009. I met with Professors Nancy Speckmann ( Rich, was her TA ) and Farid Abdel-Nour off campus for meetings. Both Professors told me that my Son spent long hours in Nasatir Hall, ROOM 131 ( where most of the brain cancer victims were located ). I was told that my Son would meet with.

You already know about SDSU.  The UCSD campus had protests on campus in 2009 concerning a,’ Breast Cancer Cluster,’ which involved the Literature Building on campus.  I cannot get the link to come up, but if you type in,’ NYTimes 2009 UCSD Breast Cancer Cluster,’ the 1st LINK.  Dr. Leeka Khiefets was commisssioned by the UCSD campus to help in the investigation.

In this article, if you CLICK on FULL REPORT.  Page 4 shows many other people with cancer than reported.  Page 27 gives a Thanks to Jim Turman from SDG&E., for his help in the investigation.   Dr. Leeka Khiefets works, and does research through the,’ Electrical Power Research Institute.’  UCSD also had an Epidemiological Report written.  The proper procedures for both SDSU, and UCSD should have been Toxicology Studies.  Both of these people should have been eliminated from doing a study.  This was a complete conflict of interest!

http://www.10news.com/news/workers-rally-over-ucsd-cancer-cluster

http://www.10news.com/news/electromagnetic-expert-investigates-ucsd-cancer-cluster

In 2010 there was a,’ Cancer Cluster at Kelly Elementary School,’ in Carlsbad.  The report I would like you to look at, will not come up.  If you type in,’ Carlsbad Cancer Cluster,’ there is an article written by Dr. Thomas Mack.  Dr. Mack is the one who wrote the Epidemiological Report for SDSU.   These schools are Covering Up.  Had any of these Schools conducted Toxicology Studies, maybe the whole Smart Grid/ Meters could have been stopped.

The HPWREN cell tower on the SDSU campus is connected to the Lambda Grid, Tera Grid, PRAGMA Grid.  Combined this is the,’ SMART GRID.’  It is also connected to the Inmarsat Satellite:
                                                          HPWREN-Inmarsat:       http://hpwren.ucsd.edu/news/010926.html
                                                                          Inmarsat:      www.inmarsat.com/Support/Manuals/index.htm
images (21)
 

Here is the picture of the HPWREN cell tower at SDSU.  This cell tower is on top of the Communications building on campus, and is located at the highest point.  Nasatir Hall is the building on the lower left, and room 131 is the 1st floor bottom window, closest too you.

These two buildings are approximately 100-150 yards apart.  In the movie, it doesn’t go into it, but notice the dead tree foliage on the surrounding trees.  I took this picture in 2009 when I met these professors off campus for meetings.  They are afraid to lose their jobs, but mostly their lives!

I met an emf expert on campus, fall of 2011 with a very good meter, which could not handle the emissions.  The sad part about it, is there is an outdoor courtyard directly underneath this cell tower at the top of the hill.  While on campus ( every day for 3 weeks with signs ) there were kids sitting under this cell tower most of the time, and for long periods of time.  Below is a list of cell towers near Kelly Elementary in Carlsbad.
Virginia


From:
To: americanassociationforcellphonesafety@googlegroups.com
Subject: Carlsbad Cancer Cluster –
Date:

   I did a search on towers and antennas in the Kelley Elementary area of Carlsbad, CA.  here is what I found.  The sheer # is staggering.  59 towers, 219 antennas.  No wonder the kids are sick.  Distance means distance from school.
Melinda
Alert! 3 New Tower Applications found within 4.00 miles of Kelley Elementary,Carlsbad, California, United States.
Tower Type ID Num Site Owner Height Dist
Registered (1) Oceanside Fire Department, City Of 40 feet 2.16 miles
(2) Sba 2012 Tc Assets, Llc 37 feet 2.30 miles
(3) Pacific Bell Mobile Services 45 feet 2.84 miles
(4) T-mobile West Llc 29 feet 3.41 miles
(5) Sprint Telephony Pcs, L.p. 50 feet 3.58 miles

 

Not Registered (1) Cox California Pcs Inc 44 feet .29 miles
(2) Nextel Communications 45 feet .63 miles
(3) Gianni Associates Msi 52 feet 1.11 miles
(4) Us West Cellular Of California, Inc. 37 feet 1.21 miles
(5) Verizon Wireless (vaw) Llc 30 feet 1.33 miles
(6) Attws 65 feet 1.37 miles
(7) San Diego, County Of 400 feet 1.42 miles
(8) Nextel Communications Inc 400 feet 1.44 miles
(9) Crown Castle Usa For Sprint 58 feet 1.44 miles
(10) Nextel Communications 35 feet 1.49 miles
(11) Nextel Communications 73 feet 1.92 miles
(12) Airtouch Cellular 80 feet 2.06 miles
(13) Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 31 feet 2.19 miles
(14) Cox California Pcs Inc 40 feet 2.20 miles
(15) Carpenters Garage Inc. 35 feet 2.25 miles
(16) Cox California Pcs Inc 47 feet 2.63 miles
(17) Airtouch Cellular 60 feet 2.66 miles
(18) Pacific Bell Mobile Services 55 feet 2.70 miles
(19) Pacific Bell Wireless 51 feet 2.74 miles
(20) Pacific Bell Mobile Services 30 feet 2.74 miles
(21) Blank 163 feet 2.75 miles
(22) Verizon Wireless Vaw Llc 33 feet 2.80 miles
(23) Nextel Communications 45 feet 2.91 miles
(24) Pactel Cellular 52 feet 3.11 miles
(25) Oceanside, City Of 60 feet 3.11 miles
(26) Blank 50 feet 3.15 miles
(27) Crown Castle – West Area – Deedee Stout 60 feet 3.17 miles
(28) Blank 60 feet 3.19 miles
(29) Cox Communications 65 feet 3.20 miles
(30) Nextel Communications 31 feet 3.21 miles
(31)

3 Comments

LAUSD WiFi systems “Students were bleeding from the ears and nose and no incident reports were allowed by the school.” states the teacher who required medical intervention.

images (4)

“Students were bleeding from the ears and nose and no incident reports were allowed by the school.” states the teacher who required medical intervention.

NOW YOU KNOW WHY DEFIBRILLATORS ARE BEING INSTALLED IN ALL THE SCHOOLS FOLKS.

In the Fall of 2014, LAUSD, the second largest public school district in the US, officially accommodated teacher Ms. Anura Lawson by approving her request to have the Wi-Fi turned off in her classroom during the 2014-2015 school year and alternatively approving a reassignment to a different school site where Wi-Fi has yet to be installed.

Lawson-Anura.Reasonable-…dation.092214-2 (1)

The Middle School teacher reported that she fell seriously ill after a wireless system upgrade in her school in Spring 2014.  She described her cardiac symptoms during a May 28, LAUSD Common Core Tech Project meeting. Ms. Lawson also stated, “The students are having nosebleeds and the main offices are refusing to do incident reports.  I have had two seventh grade students bleeding out of their ears.” See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wghaMbzRnb4&feature=youtu.be

This is the first accommodation in a US public school system for microwave sickness.

Microwave sickness, also known as electro hypersensitivity (EHS), is not widely recognized in the US.  However, physicians in many other countries are familiar with this medical condition and the diagnosis is more common.  EHS symptoms include:  headaches, dizziness, anxiety, rapid heart beat (tachycardia) and irregular heart beat (arrhythmia), ear and nose bleeds, tinnitus, red and irritated eyes, increased mucous and upper airway congestion, itchy skin rashes, abdominal pain, poor focus and attention, memory and sleep problems.

In March 2012, the Austrian Medical Association recognized and developed EHS treatment guidelines.  In the United States, adverse effects were identified before 1988 when a US Air Force Review stated that “Experimental evidence has shown that exposure to low intensity radiation can have a profound effect on biological processes.”

The LAUSD Board of Education went ahead with a wireless technology plan in February 2013, even after they were presented with numerous letters from many noted medical doctors and researchers, including the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, imploring them to use wired technology in the classroom because of the health impacts from wireless radiation.  See http://wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html

Wireless LAUSD classrooms typically employ 30+ devices (iPads) in addition to an industrial-sized router. These devices all emit microwave radiation and represent an unprecedented level of exposure to children.

Decades of accumulated research show wireless radiation damages neurological, immune, and reproductive systems in addition to increasing cancer risk.  Professor Olle Johansson, Karolinksa Institute, Stockholm Sweeden, has stated that wireless radiation exposure studies have indicated “irreversible sterility within five generations.”  As this damage is cumulative, the longer the radiation exposure, the greater the health impact over time.

“We are getting reports of headaches and cardiac issues from across the country.  The time to act is now,” stated a spokesperson for the National Association for Children and Safe Technology (NACST).

NACST is an organization dedicated to raising awareness of the health impacts of wireless radiation on children.  They are calling for schools to use wired Internet only.  Their website details both the accumulated research showing wireless radiation’s acute as well as long term health impacts.

SOURCE:

The National Association for Children and Safe Technology

http//www.nacst.org

contact@nacst.org

Folks this is what is going on with your children once they are dropped off at school.

unnamed-1

 

This is what is going on when you keep a cell phone in your bra

 

this is what is going on when you drop your kids off at school

ipad-in-palm-beach

This is what is going on when you drop your kids off at school.

images (11)

This is worse than a cell phone in the bra because the antenna is on his zipper. What is this doing to him? How about the young girls? Why did they put the WiFi antenna at the bottom in the middle?

This is the truth about emission levels

skull-vs-ipad-basic

This is what they have to look forward to.

1101130812_600

 

This is how it is all plays out right here in your own backyard.

https://thefullertoninformer.com/apple-666-project-inkwell-and-agenda-21-an-expose-with-an-all-star-cast/

Look gang, what is going on with this stuff isn’t going to take 5 generations to accomplish. An ipad in the lap of your child for years in a classroom will probably be 100 percent effective.

A quick look at Apple’s Important Product Information Guide for the iPad WiFi + 3G reveals that the highest SAR value for the WiFi 2.4 GHz is 1.19 W/kg and for the 1800/1900 MHz cell phone network is 1.18 W/kg, which is typical for SAR values of cell phones. What is the difference? To me, the amount of radiation possibly absorbed by the body looks pretty much the same. And when the iPad or any other tablet, for that matter, is conveniently placed in the lap or on the thighs, the distance between the Wi-Fi transmitter and the human body does not look that “much greater,” anymore. It is the same like holding a cell phone to your head. Or even worse! Since our lap lacks a skull-like shell, the whole-body exposure from an RF transmitter in the lap can be much higher, especially for adolescents and children.

RF exposure levels from the Wi-Fi transmitter(s) directly at a laptop or tablet when e.g. put in the lap or on the thighs can be as high as 120,000 µW/m2 (IMTS study on WLAN 2005) or even as high as50,000,000 µW/m2 (NRW Ministry of Environment brochure on wireless devices 2012). For comparison, the exposure limit for cell tower radiation in Canada is 10,000,000 µW/m2, in Switzerland 100,000 µW/m2, in Ukraine 24,000 µW/m2At 2 feet from the iPad, I still measure peak levels of 5000 µW/m2. The EMF Working Group of the Austrian Medical Association considers any RF levels above 1000 µW/m2 “very far above normal” and above 10 µW/m2 “far above normal.”

health-effects-2-1024x768

The science

THERE ARE  ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX  Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation

http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/Electrosmog-Bibliography-COLLECTIONS,28,3376

ZONA HARDENING:

YOU SEE FOLKS, YOUR DAUGHTERS EGGS ARE BEING HARDENED SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BE PENETRABLE TO SPERM. THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED BY WIRELESS MICROWAVE RADIATION EXPOSURE WHICH HAVE BEEN SHOW TO AFFECT VOLTAGE GATED CALCIUM CHANNELS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802593

GUESS WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EGG HARDENING DURING FERTILIZATION TO PREVENT OTHER SPERM FROM PENETRATING?

The trigger for all of this begins with the corticle granules in your daughters’ eggs and their releasing of calcium ions from the cortical smooth endoplasmic reticulum in response to microwave bombardment. Hardened eggs equal no pregnancy unless you can get you kids in vitro procedures out of your Obamacare policy

 

download (1)

 

APPLE HEADQUARTERS

apple-3 (2)

 

The solution-You have two choices-

NOW

images (20)

OR LATER -THAT IS IF THE EGGS ARE EVEN VIABLE

fecundacion_invitro

50 Comments

Cancer shields for cellphones circa 2001

get (1)

13 YEARS LATER, WHERE IS THIS CHILD’S CANCER SHIELD WHILE HE AND THE OTHER FOURTEEN THOUSAND POTENTIAL VICTIMS  IN ROBERT PLETKA’S FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT CLASSROOMS ARE FORCIBLY EXPOSED?

33984_479084712158056_1011868072_n

THIS LAUSD TEACHER GOT ONE IN THE FORM OF THIS:  Read the rest of this entry »

19 Comments

THE WIRELESS AGENDA-PURLOINING THEIR FECUNDITY: THE NEXT GENERATION BETRAYED, ENSLAVED AND ENDING UP DEPRAVED.

WHERE IS EVERYONE?

agricultural-grass_w725_h544

That is a great question that will be asked someday soon unless we wake up to what is being done to our children. I IMPLORE all of you to please read this article in its entirety. This is vital information. This may be the most important article that you have ever read in your entire life.  Read the rest of this entry »

216 Comments

Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!