Archive for category radiation experiments on school children
Public Health is Not a Sport Doc. Don’t Play Games With Our Children’s Health.
ONE YEAR LATER AND OUR CHILDREN STILL DESERVE BETTER!
When learning of the issue of WiFi and wireless device health impacts, one of the first thoughts that often cross our minds is: “This can’t be possible that WiFi and these devices are harmful. Surely some governmental or health agency would have prevented this from happening.”
For many of us it just doesn’t make sense, because we assume that they couldn’t be that bad, otherwise “they” would have stopped it. One of the hardest things to realize is that many individuals, groups, and entities are actively blocking the public from learning about very serious health impacts affecting their communities from wireless technology.
Why would people do this? Don’t they realize that they are hurting their own children? Parents are busy, and they can’t spend hours upon hours doing scientific research. They therefore tend to base their decision on information that they consider trustworthy. Perhaps they will go on the web and read an article or two, or they will visit the World Health Organization’s website and read up. Not surprisingly, the most common approach is to ask someone who has a medical background, namely a nurse or doctor. In seems that in every school in which parents bring forth the issue of WiFi and wireless device health risks, certain figures manage to appear who will do everything in their power to block the process, and will fight tooth and nail to insist that wireless technology stays, even if it means presenting distorted and or false information to their communities. Usually this is a tech-savvy school board member, a technological integration specialist, or someone whose motivation is borne of his infatuation with gadgets. Sometimes it’s a school board member who doesn’t want the children to be left behind.
In Fullerton California, it’s a medical doctor named Dr. Roman Schulze. Read the rest of this entry »
ZINA ON THE FENCE-AGAIN
Folks trying to get Zina Gleason’s positions on issues has been, let’s just say, a tad difficult, especially when it comes to what I believe to be the crown jewel of this election- CARRYING OVER THE FORCED CLASSROOM WIRELESS MICROWAVE RADIATION EXPOSURE MODEL FROM THE FSD INTO THE HIGH SCHOOLS. She won’t answer any emails and deletes Facebook posts containing questions about the wireless issue.
So why is it that she appears to love the fence so much?
Why does she love many fences like the bond loving fence?
Fawley’s follies-The Union Puppet and the union hacks on the front lines
There is a strange phenomenon taking place where the red Fawley signs go up. The opponents signs go down. Fawley is a union trifecta while she makes no bones about it being all in the family.
She openly supports the irresponsible Read the rest of this entry »
SDSU BRAIN CANCER CLUSTER – UCSD BREAST CANCER CLUSTER – CARLSBAD CANCER CLUSTER
<>PROW CELL TOWERS/ SDSU BRAIN CANCER CLUSTER
to be futile. I then drove out to San Diego, staying the whole month of October 2009. I met with Professors Nancy Speckmann ( Rich, was her TA ) and Farid Abdel-Nour off campus for meetings. Both Professors told me that my Son spent long hours in Nasatir Hall, ROOM 131 (where most of the brain cancer victims were located ). I was told that my Son would meet with students in this room, study and grade papers, even on weekends.
After arriving back home the SDSU Administration had sent me an Epidemiological Report written by a Dr. Thomas Mack. 3rd paragraph of this report he mentions that he has,’ No known knowledge of chemical or radiation concerns and therefore are none.’ I e-mailed Dr. Mack and he called me at home. I asked him about a specific Cell Tower that is directly outside of Nasatir Hall, and room 131. Dr. Mack denied this could be the cause and SDSU BRAIN CANCER CLUSTER – UCSD BREAST CANCER CLUSTER – CARLSBAD CANCER CLUSTER
I immediately started to contact the SDSU Administration and found this to be futile. I then drove out to San Diego, staying the whole month of October 2009. I met with Professors Nancy Speckmann ( Rich, was her TA ) and Farid Abdel-Nour off campus for meetings. Both Professors told me that my Son spent long hours in Nasatir Hall, ROOM 131 ( where most of the brain cancer victims were located ). I was told that my Son would meet with.
You already know about SDSU. The UCSD campus had protests on campus in 2009 concerning a,’ Breast Cancer Cluster,’ which involved the Literature Building on campus. I cannot get the link to come up, but if you type in,’ NYTimes 2009 UCSD Breast Cancer Cluster,’ the 1st LINK. Dr. Leeka Khiefets was commisssioned by the UCSD campus to help in the investigation.
In this article, if you CLICK on FULL REPORT. Page 4 shows many other people with cancer than reported. Page 27 gives a Thanks to Jim Turman from SDG&E., for his help in the investigation. Dr. Leeka Khiefets works, and does research through the,’ Electrical Power Research Institute.’ UCSD also had an Epidemiological Report written. The proper procedures for both SDSU, and UCSD should have been Toxicology Studies. Both of these people should have been eliminated from doing a study. This was a complete conflict of interest!
http://www.10news.com/news/workers-rally-over-ucsd-cancer-cluster
http://www.10news.com/news/electromagnetic-expert-investigates-ucsd-cancer-cluster
In 2010 there was a,’ Cancer Cluster at Kelly Elementary School,’ in Carlsbad. The report I would like you to look at, will not come up. If you type in,’ Carlsbad Cancer Cluster,’ there is an article written by Dr. Thomas Mack. Dr. Mack is the one who wrote the Epidemiological Report for SDSU. These schools are Covering Up. Had any of these Schools conducted Toxicology Studies, maybe the whole Smart Grid/ Meters could have been stopped.
Here is the picture of the HPWREN cell tower at SDSU. This cell tower is on top of the Communications building on campus, and is located at the highest point. Nasatir Hall is the building on the lower left, and room 131 is the 1st floor bottom window, closest too you.
These two buildings are approximately 100-150 yards apart. In the movie, it doesn’t go into it, but notice the dead tree foliage on the surrounding trees. I took this picture in 2009 when I met these professors off campus for meetings. They are afraid to lose their jobs, but mostly their lives!
I met an emf expert on campus, fall of 2011 with a very good meter, which could not handle the emissions. The sad part about it, is there is an outdoor courtyard directly underneath this cell tower at the top of the hill. While on campus ( every day for 3 weeks with signs ) there were kids sitting under this cell tower most of the time, and for long periods of time. Below is a list of cell towers near Kelly Elementary in Carlsbad.
Virginia
From:
To: americanassociationforcellphon
Subject: Carlsbad Cancer Cluster –
Date:
I did a search on towers and antennas in the Kelley Elementary area of Carlsbad, CA. here is what I found. The sheer # is staggering. 59 towers, 219 antennas. No wonder the kids are sick. Distance means distance from school.
Melinda
Alert! 3 New Tower Applications found within 4.00 miles of Kelley Elementary,Carlsbad, California, United States.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LAUSD WiFi systems “Students were bleeding from the ears and nose and no incident reports were allowed by the school.” states the teacher who required medical intervention.
“Students were bleeding from the ears and nose and no incident reports were allowed by the school.” states the teacher who required medical intervention.
NOW YOU KNOW WHY DEFIBRILLATORS ARE BEING INSTALLED IN ALL THE SCHOOLS FOLKS.
In the Fall of 2014, LAUSD, the second largest public school district in the US, officially accommodated teacher Ms. Anura Lawson by approving her request to have the Wi-Fi turned off in her classroom during the 2014-2015 school year and alternatively approving a reassignment to a different school site where Wi-Fi has yet to be installed.
Lawson-Anura.Reasonable-…dation.092214-2 (1)
The Middle School teacher reported that she fell seriously ill after a wireless system upgrade in her school in Spring 2014. She described her cardiac symptoms during a May 28, LAUSD Common Core Tech Project meeting. Ms. Lawson also stated, “The students are having nosebleeds and the main offices are refusing to do incident reports. I have had two seventh grade students bleeding out of their ears.” See http://www.youtube.com/
This is the first accommodation in a US public school system for microwave sickness.
Microwave sickness, also known as electro hypersensitivity (EHS), is not widely recognized in the US. However, physicians in many other countries are familiar with this medical condition and the diagnosis is more common. EHS symptoms include: headaches, dizziness, anxiety, rapid heart beat (tachycardia)
In March 2012, the Austrian Medical Association recognized and developed EHS treatment guidelines. In the United States, adverse effects were identified before 1988 when a US Air Force Review stated that “Experimental evidence has shown that exposure to low intensity radiation can have a profound effect on biological processes.”
The LAUSD Board of Education went ahead with a wireless technology plan in February 2013, even after they were presented with numerous letters from many noted medical doctors and researchers, including the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, imploring them to use wired technology in the classroom because of the health impacts from wireless radiation. See http://wifiinschools.com/
Wireless LAUSD classrooms typically employ 30+ devices (iPads) in addition to an industrial-sized router. These devices all emit microwave radiation and represent an unprecedented level of exposure to children.
Decades of accumulated research show wireless radiation damages neurological, immune, and reproductive systems in addition to increasing cancer risk. Professor Olle Johansson, Karolinksa Institute, Stockholm Sweeden, has stated that wireless radiation exposure studies have indicated “irreversible sterility within five generations.”
“We are getting reports of headaches and cardiac issues from across the country. The time to act is now,” stated a spokesperson for the National Association for Children and Safe Technology (NACST).
NACST is an organization dedicated to raising awareness of the health impacts of wireless radiation on children. They are calling for schools to use wired Internet only. Their website details both the accumulated research showing wireless radiation’s acute as well as long term health impacts.
SOURCE:
The National Association for Children and Safe Technology
Folks this is what is going on with your children once they are dropped off at school.
This is what is going on when you keep a cell phone in your bra
this is what is going on when you drop your kids off at school
This is what is going on when you drop your kids off at school.
This is worse than a cell phone in the bra because the antenna is on his zipper. What is this doing to him? How about the young girls? Why did they put the WiFi antenna at the bottom in the middle?
This is the truth about emission levels
This is what they have to look forward to.
This is how it is all plays out right here in your own backyard.
Look gang, what is going on with this stuff isn’t going to take 5 generations to accomplish. An ipad in the lap of your child for years in a classroom will probably be 100 percent effective.
A quick look at Apple’s Important Product Information Guide for the iPad WiFi + 3G reveals that the highest SAR value for the WiFi 2.4 GHz is 1.19 W/kg and for the 1800/1900 MHz cell phone network is 1.18 W/kg, which is typical for SAR values of cell phones. What is the difference? To me, the amount of radiation possibly absorbed by the body looks pretty much the same. And when the iPad or any other tablet, for that matter, is conveniently placed in the lap or on the thighs, the distance between the Wi-Fi transmitter and the human body does not look that “much greater,” anymore. It is the same like holding a cell phone to your head. Or even worse! Since our lap lacks a skull-like shell, the whole-body exposure from an RF transmitter in the lap can be much higher, especially for adolescents and children.
RF exposure levels from the Wi-Fi transmitter(s) directly at a laptop or tablet when e.g. put in the lap or on the thighs can be as high as 120,000 µW/m2 (IMTS study on WLAN 2005) or even as high as50,000,000 µW/m2 (NRW Ministry of Environment brochure on wireless devices 2012). For comparison, the exposure limit for cell tower radiation in Canada is 10,000,000 µW/m2, in Switzerland 100,000 µW/m2, in Ukraine 24,000 µW/m2. At 2 feet from the iPad, I still measure peak levels of 5000 µW/m2. The EMF Working Group of the Austrian Medical Association considers any RF levels above 1000 µW/m2 “very far above normal” and above 10 µW/m2 “far above normal.”
The science
THERE ARE ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation
http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/Electrosmog-Bibliography-COLLECTIONS,28,3376
ZONA HARDENING:
YOU SEE FOLKS, YOUR DAUGHTERS EGGS ARE BEING HARDENED SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BE PENETRABLE TO SPERM. THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED BY WIRELESS MICROWAVE RADIATION EXPOSURE WHICH HAVE BEEN SHOW TO AFFECT VOLTAGE GATED CALCIUM CHANNELS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802593
GUESS WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EGG HARDENING DURING FERTILIZATION TO PREVENT OTHER SPERM FROM PENETRATING?
The trigger for all of this begins with the corticle granules in your daughters’ eggs and their releasing of calcium ions from the cortical smooth endoplasmic reticulum in response to microwave bombardment. Hardened eggs equal no pregnancy unless you can get you kids in vitro procedures out of your Obamacare policy
APPLE HEADQUARTERS
The solution-You have two choices-
NOW
OR LATER -THAT IS IF THE EGGS ARE EVEN VIABLE
Cancer shields for cellphones circa 2001
13 YEARS LATER, WHERE IS THIS CHILD’S CANCER SHIELD WHILE HE AND THE OTHER FOURTEEN THOUSAND POTENTIAL VICTIMS IN ROBERT PLETKA’S FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT CLASSROOMS ARE FORCIBLY EXPOSED?
THIS LAUSD TEACHER GOT ONE IN THE FORM OF THIS: Read the rest of this entry »
THE WIRELESS AGENDA-PURLOINING THEIR FECUNDITY: THE NEXT GENERATION BETRAYED, ENSLAVED AND ENDING UP DEPRAVED.
WHERE IS EVERYONE?
That is a great question that will be asked someday soon unless we wake up to what is being done to our children. I IMPLORE all of you to please read this article in its entirety. This is vital information. This may be the most important article that you have ever read in your entire life. Read the rest of this entry »
Recent Comments