THE WIRELESS AGENDA-PURLOINING THEIR FECUNDITY: THE NEXT GENERATION BETRAYED, ENSLAVED AND ENDING UP DEPRAVED.


WHERE IS EVERYONE?

agricultural-grass_w725_h544

That is a great question that will be asked someday soon unless we wake up to what is being done to our children. I IMPLORE all of you to please read this article in its entirety. This is vital information. This may be the most important article that you have ever read in your entire life.

Windows-8-Wallpaper-18

As parents, we all work hard and naturally want the best for our children and look forward to watching them someday have a family of their own. We live in a brave new world indeed however and microwave radiation has firmly established itself as an integral part of everyday life. In 2014, it has found its way into your workplace, your home and now even your children’s classrooms. So what if I told you that wireless radiation is illegal in California to spray into a K-6 classroom?

I firmly believe the Autism epidemic is a direct result of wireless radiation exposure and you can read more about that here:

http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/

So what if under the guise of progress, 21st century learning and the rush to keep up with technological advances, we unknowingly had our children relinquish their reproductive rights by implied consent to classroom microwave EMF exposure? Is there an agenda behind the wireless classroom model being rolled out all over the world? I truly believe that there is. The overpopulation myth continues to be propagated by academia with our tax dollars ad nauseum and the clinically insane eugenicists. The fact of the matter is that there is so much open land on this planet that it is ridiculous.

I am reminded of what, at first glance by the famous explorer, Vasco De Balboa, upon arrival to the shores of Southern California stated as he surveyed the area. He claimed that the area was “uninhabitable” due to the persistent smoke from the naturally occurring fires and the desert terrain. In reality, nothing could have been further from the truth. Today from an airplane, this area somewhat resembles an urban forest. We are told that there is a water shortage when in reality, the aquifer under Orange County is almost one mile deep. We are told that there is not enough food. Look at everyone’s yards with all of the inedible landscape, trees that produce no fruit, concrete and grass. We now get our food from foreign countries watered in some cases with raw sewage, sprayed with banned pesticides, and fertilized with petrochemical poisons. What on earth is going on? We allow ourselves to be crammed into these compact cities and choose to buy instead of grow our own food.

We are told that the pollution levels continue to rise when in reality, the air has never been cleaner because of improved technologies. We are told the deforestation of the planet will lead to our demise. The fact of the matter is we have more trees alive on this continent than ever before due to irrigation. 50-70% of our oxygen comes from the oceans. We will never run out of air.

Climate change? You bet. It is called geo engineering. This is man made and is accomplished with aerosol dispersal of metallic nano particles at high altitudes (strange lines in the sky and funny clouds that look like powder not a powder puff) https://www.google.com/search?q=chemtrails&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=jJpkU5TTEsfIoASF7IH4Dg&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=598&dpr=1  that interact with radio frequency emissions from the billion watt Telsa antenna farm up in Gakona Alaska otherwise know as HAARP along with other infrastructure. Yeah HAARP has been turned off since June, 2013-yeah right. Drought, floods, extreme weather? All engineered and RF technology is involved.

The problems of global food shortages and water shortages are primarily logistics and weather modification technology in the hands of corrupt governments, poor planning, overcrowded living conditions as a result of government policies, onerous land use restrictions and burdensome taxation. Ladies and gentleman, there would be plenty to go around if everyone was paying attention. Sadly we are not. We have the resources, the raw materials, the energy, the know how and the technology to solve our problems. What we don’t have is the leadership. This brings us to the point.

The real reason that the stated goal of those in power is to reduce human populations is not because of any of the aforementioned. In fact it, is quite the opposite. The real reason is that there are too many of us for them to control-plain and simple. The moat around the castles don’t work anymore with 7 billion people.

So how does the wireless classroom agenda fit into all of this? Like a glove I tell you. You see it is no mystery that these microwave EMF emissions effect fertility. There are all kinds of studies that clearly link exposure to infertility and it is via a non-thermal mechanism. You will always be told that it has never been proven. You will be told that your shower, shampoo, a stinkin’ joint or a chicken drumstick is the culprit:

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323394504578607641775723354-lMyQjAxMTAzMDEwNjExNDYyWj.html?mod=wsj_share_email

In the meantime I believe that you are all foolishly banking your lineage on the notion that EMF emissions play no role in infertility because there are literally a hundred thousand studies and articles online that state that they do play a role:

https://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&q=emf+and+infertility&oq=emfandinfer&gs_l=hp.1.0.0i13i30.1242.6198.0.9615.11.11.0.0.0.0.199.1569.0j11.11.0….0.0..1c.1.20.psy-ab.L4ls45OStw8&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.49405654%2Cd.cGE%2Cpv.xjs.s.en_US.QXiTEk6XjhM.O&fp=759e4372eb9e5bcf&biw=1280&bih=555

So where does the edict originate to implement the microwave matrix in our classrooms? It is top down and I will give you a hint:

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-06-06/politics/39782793_1_president-obama-obama-s-broadband.

It then works its way down the ladder to:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/ne/yr13/yr13rel62.asp

It then shows up in our own schools here:

http://thefullertoninformer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/wireless.doc-3.pdf

I try to stop it here:

http:// thewirelessagenda.com

There, ladies and gentleman, is your implied consent to expose your children. You can laugh, you can kick you can scream, you can love me or hate me but like Elton John sang 40 years ago-“don’t shoot me I am only the piano player”. I am just a messenger. You can choose to do your own research. I already have. You can choose to ignore this warning and bank your family’s lineage on some empty promises from some lackey educrats that will have long since be retired when you find out that old Joe was right.

The choice is yours. They are your children. I don’t know about you but I am not going to allow my children to take part in the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever known and I hope you won’t either. Please get YOUR CHILDREN OUT OF HARMS WAY AND GET involved before it is too late. So here we go gang:
10155708_10202182003574449_1361734268974358709_n

WIRELESS DEVICES AND VIDEO GAMES ARE SCIENTIFICALLY DESIGNED TO BE HIGHLY ADDICTIVE TO OUR CHILDREN. THEY ALMOST ALWAYS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, RESULT IN SOME FORM OF ADDICTION. ENDORPHIN RELEASE AT THE PUSH OF A BUTTON IS COUPLED WITH FLICKER RATE MANIPULATION, LIGHT WAVELENGTH MANIPULATION, SUBLIMINAL IMAGERY, OVERT IMAGERY AND SOUNDS THAT PRODUCE A FRAME OF MIND WHICH IS DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO THE WORLD VIEW OF ALMOST ANY HUMAN BEING WITH A CONSCIENCE. THE TECHNOLOGY ALWAYS ENDS UP CONTROLLING THE CHILD INEVITABLY AS IT IS FAR TOO POWERFUL. LET US NOT ALLOW THOSE BEHIND IT TO DESTROY OUR CHILDREN IN MORE WAYS THAN YOU COULD EVER IMAGINE.

 LET US BEGIN:

The brain becomes the child, the child becomes the brain:

They put the stores on every corner that peddle this stuff to the kids:

loaded to the hilt: download

 

 

The choices are endless:

 

It starts out being fun:

Then it gets taken up a notch and becomes an obsession:

Suddenly, things begin to change and you wonder why?

You begin to wonder what is going on with your child’s new online friends:

It seemed like yesterday that your child would play outside but now this is all they want to do:

The parks and playgrounds around town now look like this on the weekends:

The sun is out and the kids are not:

Soon they stay up late at night and are not sleeping as much as before:

 

Now school is a place for rest:

Their behavior at home begins to change and you wonder why:

But mom, all the kids are gaming:

You begin to attempt to limit the screen time and the behavior you observe is frightening:

Soon, the friends your child has, only want to game. The child’s world is not the same anymore and you question if he will ever be the same:

You are losing control of your child to the screen time and the lack of sleep watching certain games involving all kinds of demonic images, violent, bloodthirsty thrill killing sprees, torture ,with places like dungeons, with every evil imaginable, ending up in right in front of your child’s face, eternally etching a place in the recesses of their formidable developing minds.

Now you are realizing that you are losing them to the:

The child regresses into a brave, dark, demonic new world. Activities from what seem to be a bygone era, rife with simple pleasures such as a bike ride or a trip to the park,  now seem a million miles away:

 

Now human life has little meaning as a result of the constant conditioning:

Adult human life has little or no value:

Much less a child or or the unborn:

 

You rationalize it and buy him more of the latest and greatest because everyone is doing it:

Soon non stop demonic images end up parading at record speed right in front of your child’s face:

What happened to my child and will he need help?

 

Does he need:

Will he ever be the same and can I ever get him back from the blue glow and its darkness?

How did all this begin?

Soon one thing led to another with the screen time because the experts know best:

The screen time begins younger and younger with each passing year:

But the experts tell us we need them to compete:

Soon they  use them more and more as they get older:

And soon screen time becomes all the time:

And before you know it, as you were when you were young:

You now find yourself older and all the more surrounded by the blue glow:

Many of the devices are designed to be two way wireless transmitters with infrared imagery sensing and audio feeds that continuously track, record, transmit the data offsite to unknown locations and all the while emit continuous pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation emissions 24/7 even when it IS TURNED OFF. It only stops the emissions when it is UNPLUGGED! Does your child sleep near one of these?

The wireless emissions are 24/7 in your child’s face:

In your child’s lap at home:

And in your child’s lap at school:

All the while seated under or near the wireless router at school:

images-11

 

or next to it at home:

download (11)

 

 

And what is all of this screen time and wireless exposure doing to your child?

images (13)

 

Does constant wireless exposure effect fertility?

There are those 6’s again-3 of them and what is with the luminescent energy splitting open the sphere?:

Did you know that the female gametes or eggs contain only the X sex chromosome ?

 

The boys gametes contain  both the X and the Y chromosomes:

X -blue + Y-yellow= GREEN

Is this the heart of this device?

Who is the man behind this company?

10155708_10202182003574449_1361734268974358709_n-218x300

What is with the red mic and his vaccine agenda?

 

Here is his legacy to the earth.  This is the future appearance of the world  headquarters for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They have plans for a total of three 6 story buildings. There are those three 6’s again. Funny these look like magnets.

gates-foundation-campus

Looks like when connected they make an infinite loop. Bill Gates’s father was once THE HEAD OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD. WHY IS BILL GATES SO OBSESSED WITH EDUCATION AND VACCINES? WHY DOES HE CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CHILDREN?

The other big player in all of this is Apple computer company. Let’s have a look at  Apple’s Cupertino headquarters at 1 Infinite loop.

thdownload (8)

Does the Apple facility’s design layout explain part of the process by which their ultimate responsibility to the environment is accomplished? Here is some more of the green and some interesting artwork that appears to outline a bizarre mechanism:

Notice the similarities between Apple’s Cupertino headquarters and the human ovum in the process of fertilization.

Notice how the nucleus is being electrocuted while what appear to be the other sperm is turned away-

image001

Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino

 

apple-3-2

Apple’s Cupertino headquarters-notice the similarities to the endoplasmic reticulum in a female egg below

 

download-1

The part of the egg cell that hardens the membrane blocking sperm penetration-this is activated by microwaves

The trigger for all of this begins with the corticle granules in your daughters’ eggs and their releasing of calcium ions from the cortical smooth endoplasmic reticulum in response to microwave bombardment. Hardened eggs equal no pregnancy unless you can get you kids in vitro procedures out of your Obamacare policy

YOU SEE FOLKS, YOUR DAUGHTERS EGGS ARE BEING HARDENED SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BE PENETRABLE TO SPERM. THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED BY WIRELESS MICROWAVE RADIATION EXPOSURE WHICH HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO AFFECT VOLTAGE GATED CALCIUM CHANNELS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802593

GUESS WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EGG HARDENING DURING FERTILIZATION TO PREVENT OTHER SPERM FROM PENETRATING?

download-1

 

apple-3-2

Apples HQ in Cupertino

 

apple-headquarters-cupertino-spaceship-plan-620x663

Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino

sperm

what you and I once were before wireless devices in the laps of little girls in school

gr149

Looks like Apple’s Cupertino headquarters resembles the schematic of a zona hardened egg experiencing failed cell division after fertilization:

apple-3

Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino

images (6)

Normal cell division after normal Zona hardening resulting from fertilization.

 

Cell Membrane potential is all electrical.

clip_image0043

So are wireless tablets and cell phone emissions:

health-effects-1-1024x770

download (13)

Classroom Wireless access point emissions puling modulated radio frequency microwave emissions at the exact frequency where the maximum dielectric loss of water begins: This is no accident. There are trillions of frequencies but they have chosen this exact one to leave wide open to proliferation by NOT REQUIRING ANY BROADCAST LICENSE.

images (15)

So back to the gaming systems. What is the significance of the letters and their colors on these buttons again?

Who is ultimately behind the wireless radiation exposure safety guidelines and vaccination programs:

 

Who has the exclusive market on the wireless device market  in the classrooms?

Here they are those  three sixes  again:

images (11)

images (9)

 

apple-1-666 (1)

What is with the three 6’s?

What did Adam and Eve do wrong?

f34b7f9d643b5542ebb652744165dea520110325172542 (1)

You just bought these for your children for Christmas:

It will spend more time with your child than you will:

look where the WiFi antenna is located:

images (7)

images (8)

In the classroom and at home, WiFi mode is utilized:

Why is the antenna placed where it would be emitting pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation at levels trillions of times the normal background levels right smack dab in direct proximity to the sensitive developing reproductive areas of our children?

33984_479084712158056_1011868072_n (2)

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=479084712158056&set=a.467172693349258.106292.467056220027572&type=1&theater

Your school and PTA are pushing for these:

You find yourself supporting fundraising at the school for more:

 

And for years these will be transmitting pulse modulated microwave radiation in DIRECT CONTACT WITH:

 

At home by your choice as a parent:

And forced on your children at school:

 

Robert Pletka FSD superintendent:

Fullerton School District Superintenedent  Robert Pletka.

Fullerton School District Superintenedent Robert Pletka.

 

“Your request that the district turn off wireless connectivity and remove IPads from your children’s respective classrooms….is respectfully DENIED.” 11-1-2013 letter to Joe Imbriano.

What does all this mean?

 

When you add all of this up, is this what  we get?

And by the way, who is watching, listening, tracking, and developing algorithms and dossiers on you and your children through the black box trap doors from afar?

gates-foundation-campus

Cant get into school without these right?

 

No shots No school? Right?

Now you see the city and its people:

images-3

Now you don’t:

Windows-8-Start-Screen

Notice now how everyone is gone, and to where, you can use your imagination. The three arches above appear to be a resurrected monument of sorts with a striking resemblance to the original location of these funny looking buildings over at The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that remind me of horseshoe magnets. Is it mission accomplished with the 3 arches representing the three  6 story buildings at the Gates foundation headquarters erected upright in their utopian world without people in the above photo of what Seattle may look like someday? 

gates-foundation-campus

 

Let’s have another look at this picture.

Windows-8-Wallpaper-18

What is with the Sun and the little ball next to it? Is the needle symbolic of the force vaccination program’s successes?

semhvey4hlgzywl5vegv

Red and yellow make orange. Google is getting ready to blanket the entire planet in microwave emissions from space.  http://gizmodo.com/wsj-google-spending-1-billion-on-satellites-to-cover-1584675816 Looks like Google paints with all the colors of the wind.

So Google will blanket the planet in WiFi with 180 satellites- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2646039/Googles-plans-world-domination-Search-giant-launch-180-satellites-bring-internet-access-ENTIRE-planet.html

180 satellites- 3 x 60= 180 and just for good measure they may double the number to 360 -there are your 3 sixes again.

Google’s venture is being led by Greg Wyler, founder of satellite-communications start-up O3b Networks, and depending on the network’s final design, the group may double the number of proposed satellites. 

Two-thirds of the world still remain without internet access. Google is now planning to change this by launching a fleet of 180 satellites to provide web access for the 4.8 billion people not yet online

Two-thirds of the world still remain without internet access. Google is now planning to change this by launching a fleet of 180 satellites to provide web access for the 4.8 billion people not yet online

So where does that leave all of us? But really now, where did everybody go?

YOU BETTER START ASKING SOME QUESTIONS PRETTY QUICKLY FOLKS.

START WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS BECAUSE WITHIN 5 YEARS BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

THEY WILL ALL HAVE WIRELESS CLASSROOMS THANKS TO CONNECT ED:

 

99% OF US SCHOOL CLASSROOMS WITHIN FIVE YEARS WILL BE WIRELESS LEAVING NOWHERE TO RUN EXCEPT RIGHT INTO THEIR ARMS:

29017_10151546918994238_548657513_n

 

AT HOME YOU CAN  OPT FOR WIRED TECHNOLOGY:

BUT NOT AT SCHOOL AS THERE WILL BE MANDATORY WIRELESS EXPOSURE :

BUT IT IS FOR THEIR FUTURE RIGHT?

 

WILL IT BE ONE IN WHICH BECOMING ONE OF THESE WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE?

WILL ENJOYING THESE SPECIAL DAYS AS PARENTS THAT YOU AND I TAKE FOR GRANTED BECOME IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM SOMEDAY?

The science

HERE ARE  ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX  Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation  RIGHT HERE:

Parents for Safe Schools 2013 Collection of Studies, Videos and News Releases

ZONA HARDENING:

YOU SEE FOLKS, ONCE AGAIN, YOUR DAUGHTERS EGGS ARE BEING HARDENED SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BE PENETRABLE TO SPERM. THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED BY WIRELESS MICROWAVE RADIATION EXPOSURE WHICH HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO AFFECT VOLTAGE GATED CALCIUM CHANNELS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL.

MAY ALMIGHTY GOD HELP US PROTECT THIS GENERATION THAT WE HAVE BEEN BESTOWED WITH THE PRIVILEGE OF AND ENTRUSTED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CARING FOR. MAY HE GRANT YOU THE WISDOM TO SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES AND THE COURAGE TO STAND AGAINST IT- IN JESUS NAME. AMEN.

  1. #1 by Anonymous on December 27, 2013 - 6:37 pm

    The only way out of this is to step up and be a parent to your child. This can’t be done if the parent is trying to be the child’s friend.

    • #2 by Joe Imbriano on December 27, 2013 - 8:20 pm

      Many kids don’t have parents, their parents think they are parents but they are merely brood stock custodial food and shelter providers who let the screens and the government raise their children.

      The blue glow flickers in almost every room of every house after dark and in broad daylight on the weekends. I know of 10 year olds that watch things on their phones that I cannot even mention here, and play video games all night long whenever they can. Most young children now are emaciated, pale, lethargic, wearing glasses, un coordinated, and brain damaged to an extent from the crap they are being injected with, fed, imbibing, being irradiated with, and with what they feed the window to their souls-their eyes.

      The solution? It is mandatory wireless radiation and screen time in the schools in addition to the, by choice, over the top exposure at home coupled with therapy and pills. Is that the trillion dollar economic boom that Obama is talking about with his Connect Ed broadband pitch? Does he wants to prepare them for the jobs of the future that will all go to the half priced H1b visa workers pouring in and flooding the decks as we speak? That is just fine and dandy because our kids can be 21st century learners for life living in their cement tilt up with no windows and 250 square feet replete with WiFi, MTV, microwave ovens, refrigerators, and all the blue glow accoutrements available from the latest and greatest slave good peddler and factory farm dumping ground for their daily grub.

      These games are designed to be highly addictive, guaranteeing endless microwave exposure to the reproductive areas and now the brain with the headsets.

      Where are the parents you ask? Well they are sleeping off last night, or drinking and watching TV or the ball game while their kids sit in dark rooms on beautiful sunny days drooling all over their microwaved hot pockets as their minds are turned to mush and sucked straight to hell.

      Don’t believe me? Go look around this weekend at the empty parks and streets near these upper middle class homes near Acacia elementary or in your neck of the woods and these video game stores or the retail stores that surround them. Pure evil period and there ain’t a preacher in town that will touch it with a ten foot pole. There ain’t a school district employee anywhere that I know that is trying to stop all of this irradiation and screen time, while the board members are sticking their hands over their eyes and ears, and the legislators up north pose away for campaign flyers. The PTA pushes doughnuts and muffins on the folks, campaigning for the foundations’ fundraising for radiation transmitter funding, and the parents got the deer in the headlights gaze as they become no match for the addiction that forms over time to these devices and their flicker rate manipulation programs and their migraines from the WiFi.

      Hyperbole? Perhaps and perhaps not.

      80 degrees and sunny tomorrow and another day in Fullerton where http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/963737.My_So_Called_Digital_Life continues to unfold.

      Gee thanks a million Bob.

      • #3 by Anonymous on January 9, 2014 - 3:47 pm

        Truth

        • #4 by Anonymous on January 10, 2014 - 5:52 am

          When they play, their brains produce endorphins, giving them a high similar to that experienced by gamblers or drug addicts. This is no joke

        • #5 by MCMLXVIII on January 20, 2014 - 6:15 am

          Indeed it is.

          “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. The true neighbor will risk his position, his prestige and even his life for the welfare of others.”
          — Strength to Love (1963)

          Joe, they can call you whatever the hell they want but you tell it like it is. I cannot think of a more serious threat to all of us that what you are going after here on this website. I cannot think of anyone who is more gifted to deal with this issue head on. Your dare to go where no one dares to go. I truly admire your courage and your passion.

          You don’t pull any punches and you don’t give a darn what anyone thinks. Just keep plowing through the drifts of these deniers. They are just afraid of the truth or they don’t want to know what the truth is. They are just a bunch of fools. What is sad is that their kids are paying dearly.

          • #6 by Charles on April 27, 2014 - 10:14 am

            The abhorrent denial among parents in your community is rather indicative of the depths you have sunken to as a society in the United States in general. Is Fullerton simply obsessed with injuring her defenseless? I remember when the London riots erupted in 2011 over police brutality. You had a similar incident where the constables beat a homeless man to death and the whole thing was caught on camera.

            Sir Barry Trower has written extensively on this topic of microwave radiation and children. It is a weapon of sorts. Placing the weapon in the laps of children is an abominable act.

        • #7 by Joe Imbriano on June 7, 2014 - 9:27 pm

          .95 and 2.45 GHz Most Lethal Microwave Frequencies

          by Dr. Magda Havas, BSc, PhD

          September 6, 2010.

          Why are we using some of the most lethal microwave frequencies for WiFi and digital cordless phones?
          http://www.stayonthetruth.com/most-lethal-microwave-frequencies.php

          or in the classrooms?

          stick a piece of popcorn in your ear
          Polson, P, DCL Jones, A Karp, and JS Krebs. 1974. Mortality in rats exposed to CW microwave radiation at 0.95, 2.45, 4.54, and 7.44 GHz. Final Technical Report Prepared for U.S. Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Contract DAAK02-73-C-0453. 105 pp.

          Abstract

          Dose-response (lethality) data have been obtained for rats exposed frontally to CW [continuous wave] microwave radiation in the frequency range 0.9 to 8 GHz. Approximately 1400 male rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain have been exposed in equal groups to four separate frequencies: 0.95, 2.45, 4.54, and 7.44 GHz. Power density levels have ranged from approximately 0.2 W/cm2 to 12 W/cm2[note: US/Canada guidelines are 0.001 W/cm2] and lethal exposure durations from approximately 10 sec to 300 sec. Gross and histological evaluation of selected tissues from some 20 animals has been obtained. The cause of death has been established as congestion, hemorrhage, and obstruction of nasal passages and/or congestion, hemorrhage, and often edema of the lungs. The lethality data have been subjected to a probit analysis, yielding LD50 curves for each of empirically fitted the four frequencies, and the LD50 values have been with a mathematical model. The LD curves very closely approximate the shape of rectangular hyperbolae.

          Research conducted at Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California in 1974, showed that experimental exposure to high levels of microwave radiation, well above U.S. and Canadian guidelines killed rats within a matter of seconds to few minutes.

          The higher the power density (intensity of the radiation) the more quickly the rats died. Of the four frequencies tested, the two most lethal frequencies (0.95 and 2.45 GHz) are commonly used for analog mobile phones (0.8 to 0.9 GHz); microwave ovens (2.45 GHz); and both digitally pulsed cordless phones and wireless routers (2.4 GHz). The least toxic of the frequencies was 4.54 GHz (near 5.0 GHz also used for some WiFi systems).

          The primary site of damage appears to be the blood vessels of the lung and respiratory tract with edema and hemorrhage representing changes in permeability of vessel walls.

          Rats exposed to 0.95 and 2.45 GHz felt warmer than non-irradiated rats but there was no correlation between rectal temperature and mortality. At the two highest frequencies, the rats did not feel abnormally warm to the technicians handling them. This is interesting as harmful effects are often attributed solely to heating, which, even at these very high intensities, may not be the case.

          While this study showed the most lethal frequencies (at very high intensities) are 0.95 and 2.45 GHz, it is not clear if the order to toxicity for these frequencies is the same at lower intensities.

          So why are the most lethal frequencies used for common household appliances? Because this frequency range is not licensed.

          Cell phone antennas, radio and TV broadcast antennas, radar, and other types of long distance wireless communication technologies require a license from the federal government to minimize interference of the signals in any one location. But, you do not need a license to operate your microwave oven, your WiFi, or your cordless digital phone. These frequencies are unlicensed and hence popular for common household and office equipment. That is why wireless gadgets in this frequency range are proliferating.

          Mortality in rats exposed to CW microwave radiation at 0.95, 2.45, 4.54 and 7.44 GHz
          “So why are the most lethal frequencies used for common household appliances? Because this frequency range is not licensed.”
          ~ Magda Havas, PhD

          Source
          “So why are the most lethal frequencies used for common household appliances? Because this frequency range is not licensed.” ~ Magda Havas, PhD CLICK HERE: http://www.stayonthetruth.com/most-lethal-microwave-frequencies.php
          “So why are the most lethal frequencies used for common household appliances? Because this frequency range is not licensed.” ~ Magda Havas, PhD CLICK HERE: http://www.stayonthetruth.com/most-lethal-microwave-frequencies.php

          Stay On The Truth
          Magda Havas, PhD

          1
          inShare

          Bookmark and Share

          Post by Dianne Knight.
          Educational and Informational Purposes: All information on this site and all links that are linked to from StayOnTheTruth.com represent solely the opinions of their producers.

          This information and links to more information are made available to you as a resource for your own research and evaluation not as an endorsement.

          StayOnTheTruth.com is not in the business of persuading you or anyone else to believe anything that that is presented linked to from this site; however, it does encourage you to use all available resources to form your own judgement about very important things that affect your life.

          Fair Dealing and Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair dealing’ or ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in copyright law. In accordance with the Fair Dealing or Fair Use intention, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair dealing’ or ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.

      • #8 by Anonymous on January 17, 2014 - 9:01 am

        Right on! You totally nailed it.

      • #9 by parents & cell phones on April 23, 2014 - 10:31 am

  2. #10 by Anonymous on December 28, 2013 - 5:56 am

    Mr. Imbriano, your wisdom never ceases to amaze. What a clear and clarion call to the parents of this generation.

    • #11 by Anonymous on January 9, 2014 - 7:53 pm

      You call that wisdom? Psycho babel is more like it.

  3. #12 by Anonymous on December 28, 2013 - 9:11 am

    America is ripe for judgement. These chaps ought not be bearing it. This is despicable material being marketed to young, impressionable minds with blithering idiots for parents.

    • #13 by Angie B on December 29, 2013 - 11:22 am

      The parents are “blithering idiots.”

  4. #14 by Anonymous on December 28, 2013 - 12:23 pm

    Great article! The pictures are really powerful.

  5. #15 by mom of a mom on December 29, 2013 - 8:01 am

    For almost ten years I have been trying to get through to my daughter and her husband about letting my grandson sit for hours on end playing these dangerous games. To top it off, she is a Fullerton teacher. While the WiFi issue has rarely come up, this issue has. Now that I see how all this fits together I am in total shock.

    Whats more I am afraid to argue the matter as I feel she may not bring my grandson over anymore. This is a very contentious debate and I lean more towards you being correct more than not. Getting people to listen is so difficult because they have invested so much money in these things and their lives would be turned upside down without them. Maybe that is the biggest problem.

  6. #16 by Anonymous on December 29, 2013 - 10:09 am

    Evil creeps messing with the kids minds!

  7. #17 by Jamie on December 29, 2013 - 7:08 pm

    That’s a creepy photo of Bill Gates and the vaccine.

    • #18 by Joe Imbriano on December 29, 2013 - 9:21 pm

      The schools are the compliance mechanism with which both the vaccine and wireless agendas proceed full speed ahead. The people that work there have no idea or refuse to believe what they are really involved in. The elected representatives are even worse as they are ostensibly beholden to the children, taxpayers, and the parents and their behavior would dictate otherwise.

    • #20 by creeps on January 2, 2014 - 8:49 pm

      Pletka, Giokaris, etc.; they are all creeps.

    • #21 by Joe Imbriano on February 3, 2014 - 10:30 am

      He and his cast of characters are going to get a lot more press in the days ahead. The FSD, its board of trustees, and staff are at the forefront as they , with the help of their aficionados, in my opinion have shamefully turned their backs on the kids.

  8. #22 by Anonymous on January 6, 2014 - 9:59 am

    This makes me want to weep. First hand experience with my twin grandsons, and I have to concur. It was the worst thing to have ever come in to my daughter’s home. I forwarded this to her.

    Thank you for your courage to take a stand on this issue.

  9. #23 by Anonymous on January 6, 2014 - 10:51 am

    This is complete psycho babel bull—-. Where are your sources? How long would this fear mongering read if it weren’t padded out with the photos?

    “Let me slam technology that I don’t like while using tech I do like!”

    I’m sorry you don’t understand why your children like the immersion that games attempt to provide their audience. How dare you, video games? What the —-, movies? —– you, books!

    Why can’t they just watch the white board as a middle aged woman who “knows better than you” writes algebra equations. While she writes, I’ll become hypnotized by the way her arm fat shakes as it attempts to defy gravity. Ahh, Immersion.

    Is this really about video games? Or is it just another bull—- attempt to continue the crusade against WiFi from a “fresh” angle?

    • #24 by mom1 on January 7, 2014 - 4:14 am

      If you don’t believe the information is valid, why do you react so? Why not just dismiss it?

      Everyone is free to do as they please, you included.

  10. #25 by Anonymous on January 6, 2014 - 1:11 pm

    At first you lost me with the 666 thing as it is a bit much but I do see it. It is all there right in your face. It is quite a stretch but I do see it. I wish I didn’t. My goodness, what do we do? Almost all the kids are hooked on these things.

  11. #26 by Anonymous on January 9, 2014 - 11:11 pm

    Gates is a heavy hitter in population reduction. He is at times out in the open about it.

  12. #27 by Anonymous on January 10, 2014 - 5:51 am

    I am simply at a loss for words. My heart grieves for these children. My fist clenches for these parents. My soul pities the perpetrators.

  13. #28 by enigma on January 13, 2014 - 12:41 am

  14. #29 by Anonymous on January 13, 2014 - 8:13 pm

    How come we never heard a word about from the so called pro life Catholic church? What on earth is going on?

    This is evil in its purest form preying on the unsuspecting children.

    • #30 by Anonymous on January 20, 2014 - 7:41 pm

      They are all asleep, the priests and parishioners. It’s best not to disturb them. Shhhh!

  15. #31 by Anonymous on January 19, 2014 - 9:16 am

    You are a total freak.

  16. #32 by Joe Imbriano on January 20, 2014 - 9:08 pm

    Author Jim Keith

    “If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. ‘The business of journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of the mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

  17. #33 by Anonymous on January 23, 2014 - 11:41 am

    This is a nightmare.

  18. #34 by Anonymous on January 24, 2014 - 7:11 pm

    This is horrible.

  19. #35 by Anonymous on January 24, 2014 - 10:03 pm

    This is the most insane, politically incorrect, and dangerous piece of internet hoopla that I have ever seen in my entire life. I see it though, I really do and it is scaring the hell out of me. If this is true, this is the biggest threat that all of humanity has ever faced because it affects EVERYONE.

  20. #36 by Francis on January 25, 2014 - 9:17 am

    This world is really becoming A CRAZY WORLD. MAY GOD SAY OUR GENERATION & NEXT.

  21. #37 by Anonymous on January 27, 2014 - 2:11 pm

    This is the most sinister agenda in human history and it must be defeated. Wake up!

  22. #38 by the ozone man on January 29, 2014 - 4:38 pm

    Joe, looks like you are once again, way out in front of these creeps. He is proposing the cull and you warn it is already well underway.

    http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/01/28/al-gore-suggests-fertility-management-fight-global-warming

  23. #39 by Anonymous on January 31, 2014 - 4:29 pm

    This is solid gold. It is so friggin sick and it is all right in front of your eyes.Wake up you fools.

  24. #40 by Roseanna on February 1, 2014 - 7:54 am

    This never occurred to me before. I never felt right about these games but all the kids do it. What do I tell my son? All of his friends spend all their free time glued to these games. I am truly frightened now as I see what you are talking about. It makes sense and I see it. How do you recommend getting them to give these games up? Sometimes I can’t even get him to go to bed at a decent hour. Any advice would be appreciated.

    • #41 by been there on February 2, 2014 - 6:22 pm

      What I did was start budgeting my kids on the amount of time each day they could play. You can check around to see if other parents are doing the same; that helps with the arguments that will ensue.
      If they already have unlimited time, start ratcheting it down. Tell them the new rules, be calm and firm. Tell them it is not a good use of their time, etc. They won’t care about anything you say, probably, but at some point they will know that you are doing it in their best interest. Tell them you are the parent and at some point they will be able to make these decisions for themselves, as you won’t be around. But for right now, you are their parent and you have to do what is best for them.They will probably thrown tantrums for awhile, maybe kick the door in, etc.
      You will have to find a way of sticking to their budgeted amount, a timer of some sort. If they don’t mind the rules, tell them ahead of time you will take the game away (and you must do it).
      It took awhile in our house, but my son rarely plays the xbox, anymore. If he does, he uses the wired controller I bought for him.
      Changing habits is challenging for everyone. In the case of kids, if we don’t change their habits now, we won’t get another chance. WE ONLY HAVE THEM FOR ABOUT 18 YEARS.

      Get your kids out of the house; it’s a big world out there. Discover where their interests lie.

  25. #42 by Anonymous on February 1, 2014 - 12:32 pm

    Downright freaky stuff. Then again, isnt it all these days its all that sells. Poor kids.

  26. #43 by Ray on February 3, 2014 - 7:08 am

    We limit how much time our kids play video games. It’s at about one hour per week, played on the pc.

    We don’t have a game console such as X-box, etc.

    We know other families who are much more permissive, and it is sad to see how addicted the children have become so quickly. It is literally all they talk about.

    We know other families who will not access the internet at home. These kids are not jonesing to play spongebob all day long. They are playing outside, in all weather, and still act like kids.

    It can be done. Anything can be done. It takes tremendous resolve on your part as a parent. It also takes looking at yourself to see what you do with your spare time.

  27. #44 by Melindassa Gatesa on February 21, 2014 - 5:40 pm

    Gee, thank heaven for Melinda Gates. That woman has identified the population and framed it as follows: it’s either save the planet or save the people.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_Z7whe-YHk

    Oh, yeah, and I think she and Bill have 3 children. Seems they think it’s okay for them; not so much for everyone else.

  28. #45 by David Morrison on March 24, 2014 - 1:03 am

    the STEM programs (science, tech, engineering, math) were developed by the US military in the late 80’s. they still participate in them preying on “at risk” youth, taking them to military installations and forming a relationship with them. Our school systems are enslaved by Cisco systems who sells the hardware and develops software that must be used with curriculum. Current curriculum requires Cisco hardware & software and very soon schools won’t be able to teach without this shit. Our schools are now designed as a training ground for future Cisco employees. We, as taxpayers, pay to train future Cisco employees. We have bought into a false concept of progress that will only enslave us. It is all for greed, control and surveillance. Education is dead.

  29. #46 by Anonymous on April 8, 2014 - 4:23 pm

    Solid gold and out of the park on this one Joe!

  30. #47 by Anonymous on April 10, 2014 - 11:35 pm

    dude this is some friggin scary shit

  31. #48 by Carolinda on April 12, 2014 - 2:44 pm

    You know that a few years ago, before all these games became popular, the kids would be outside. Now the streets and playgrounds are empty on the weekends. This is really sad. OMG if this is all true, it is horrible.

    Getting pregnant seems to be a problem for at least two of my friends that just got married. They both graduated and got married two and three years ago and have been trying for a few years with no success.

    • #49 by saveourkids on May 16, 2014 - 4:43 pm

      Thank goodness you are aware now. Take precautions. A study released the other day (but now I’ve forgotten where!) estimates fertility could possibly be near 0 in 2048. Not too far away… and we’re right on track… Try YouTube and Dr Martin Blank. He studies the effects of EMR. It will shock you what is being allowed in our schools.

  32. #51 by Anonymous on April 16, 2014 - 10:45 am

    This is all very alarming.

    • #52 by amateur night on April 16, 2014 - 3:27 pm

      Of course it is very alarming. This ain’t no popularity contest for Imbriano. This here is serious business.

  33. #53 by Anonymous on April 18, 2014 - 2:09 pm

    I believe that wireless in general including cell towers and other signals can be easily used to finish off a few billion in just a short amount of time. Nano technology components injected into the body can do this job for the bosses.

    • #54 by Anonymous on April 23, 2014 - 12:07 pm

      Bingo

  34. #55 by socially responsible to the environment on April 21, 2014 - 6:08 pm

  35. #61 by Jamie on April 22, 2014 - 10:58 am

    Very, very interesting on the picture comparison between the human egg and the Apple corp headquarters.
    These people are are so sick and depraved.

  36. #62 by clash of clans on April 22, 2014 - 7:12 pm

    It is right there. I see it. He nailed it.

  37. #63 by Anonymous on April 23, 2014 - 3:20 pm

  38. #64 by WiseOne on April 23, 2014 - 8:59 pm

    Joe, YOU are the Wise One, expressing these truths with the most striking clarity I have ever observed. THANK YOU.

  39. #66 by Anonymous on April 24, 2014 - 4:55 am

    Friggin evil sick bastards- all of em

  40. #67 by Joe Imbriano on April 24, 2014 - 8:11 am

    This is as in your face as anyone can make it for you all.
    God is not mocked. He will hold them in derision.

    Call me a nut job while you all scream “Give us Barabus”.
    Yes this is the cry of the parents led by a handful of blind, insecure, myopic, establishment worshipping fools. Look around at every young child with these things in their laps everywhere all the time, look at yourself in the mirror and look your children in the eyes as you cart them off to be irradiated everyday. To the Bobbsey twins that get their jollies following me around, look at your own kids, look at your own flesh and blood and don’t focus on me. It is not about, it has never been nor will it ever be about me. This is about your children’s reproductive future and a group of very powerful, evil people whose worldview is diametrically opposed to that which the naive mistakenly assume is widely held.

    • #68 by invisible man in the sky on April 24, 2014 - 11:36 am

      Hey Joe, remember this one from R. Shulze
      from way back when?

      “Look, there are people out there that believe in an invisible man in the sky that cares about them, and there is more evidence that EMF is harmful than that he exists. When engaging those people we are not playing by the same rules and that makes it difficult. And if you think that the powers that be can pursuade someone to “toe the line” to a point where they would endanger their own kids, well that’s fairly grim. I’m willing to even say that EMF may possibly be harmfull but at this point, in my considered opinion, the prepondance of the evidence indicates that it is unlikely. Tomorrow new information may come to light and I may change my opinion. I do know that today between 4000 and 8000 children starved to death and tomorrow while we discuss EMF another 4 – 8000 will starve to death too. I just feal that priority wise we are missing the point. If EMF killed 4000 children a day this would be a different conversation. I guess we all are entitled to have our causes. My education and background is irrelevant unless we really want to stoop to an argument from authority. I agree that the maximum age may not have changed much but the average or median has, for some of the reasons you pointed out. There is a difference.”

      • #69 by Anonymous on April 24, 2014 - 12:59 pm

        What does he mean by “invisible man in the sky”?

        • #70 by mocking on April 24, 2014 - 4:03 pm

          I believe that R. Shulze is an atheist. He seems to be mocking those that believe in God, referring to Him as the “invisible man in the sky.”

        • #71 by Joe Imbriano on April 25, 2014 - 7:57 am

          While it appears that he may be espousing a particular worldview that is 180 degrees off from my own, that is his purview. The fact remains that Roman is a very logical and intelligent man.

          The problem is now how one such as Roman Schulze, his wife, my next door neighbor or anyone else for that matter, deals with the following dichotomy:

          The FJUHSD has chosen to hard wire all of the district’s common core labs forgoing wireless. This is an about face from their earlier plans to permanently set up and install wireless access points throughout every campus in the district. One year ago the FJUHSD had already begun hot mapping locations for placement and had already purchased the equipment which would have provided complete WiFi access, or in my vernacular, forced wireless radiation exposure, to every student on every campus. After a short hiatus, late last summer, they confirmed in a personal meeting with us that they were indeed going forward with wireless for the district. On Tuesday night, however FJUHSD’s Bob Singer cited safety concerns having influenced their decision in opting for the hard wiring of the district.

          At the same time, the FSD continues to bring wireless to all campuses and all the way into the laps of everyone’s children down to the 5 year olds. Pletka’s facebook page is still littered with photos of children with iPads. The Acacia foundation continues to raise money and allocate it towards more iPads. FSD’s Robert Pletka states wireless is totally safe. Their Board of Trustees all remain silent. Roman Schulze participated in a presentation defending wireless classroom technology to the Board of Trustees of The Glendale Unified School District as well. It was called “WiFi safe”

          What appears to be even more troubling are the positions he and his wife have willfully chosen in this debate. They have publicly taken a personal role in advocating for wireless. Roman professionally as an MD, held himself out as an expert in the field in the presentation in Glendale and his wife has called herself a scientist. She has even gone as far as implicating the physics department at Cal State Fullerton as being in disagreement with our position that classroom wireless exposure is harmful to children. Even my next door neighbor, who is an attorney and the Acacia Foundation president, appears to have jumped on board with them some time ago. There is little doubt in my mind that these are at the core of the parent group which has chosen to refuse to grant me access to personally meet with and address the PTA. I believe that these are the individuals responsible for propagating the myth that all of the evidence presented to date should be dismissed. Roman is a medical doctor, his wife calls herself a scientist and Michelle Knowles is an attorney. There you have it, the school district officials, the wireless industry, the district’s insurance company, the FCC, and now a local doctor, a so called scientist and a local attorney up against a so called paranoid, fear mongering insurance salesman with a few science degrees under his belt who has the guts and the audacity to say no to this crap.

          I believe that children may have already been impacted and the extent of which may not be known for years as a result of their advocacy for these programs. Look what has been set in motion.

          I found it rather odd that the two Michelles were at the latest FJUHSD board meeting ostensibly to keep an eye on me.

          Instead of wasting their time following me around, I believe they should be using their precious time wisely by delving into the thousands of peer reviewed studies that show wireless exposure causes harm. I believe that Michelle Knowles should be using her God given legal talent to help fight this monster, not joining Goliath to squash me and continue the forced irradiation of the children. I believe that Roman and his wife should be using their God given medical and scientific talent to help us credibly carry this message to the ends of the earth and not to disparage it.

          In my opinion, none of their positions or actions are or have been in the best interest of the students by any means.

          I have been in stranger circumstances and prevailed, but nothing akin to any with the stakes this high. Like I have always said, it is never too late to do the right thing. I will continue to trust God, have faith, and press onward for to do anything short of that, I believe, will simply lend itself to the perpetuation of the largest unmitigated public health disaster in human history.

          • #72 by amateur night on April 25, 2014 - 3:41 am

            There goes the neighborhood.

          • #73 by Shane on April 26, 2014 - 1:08 pm

            Joe, you are right. Why would Apple put the WiFi antenna at the bottom of the iPad where it would be closest to the body? I would think the reception would be better it it were placed at the top. Why does their headquarters resemble a human egg being fertilized? Why list their first PC at $666.66? Why did they choose the apple with the bite out of it as their logo? How did they get the exclusive contracts with the schools?

            Joe, in all the years I have known you, you have always been an inspiration. God has given you discernment, wisdom and courage which have allowed you to stay one step ahead of the agendas. This one is the biggest of them all and you cracked it. I have always said that you were way ahead of your time. You guys need to listen to him.

        • #75 by Anonymous on April 25, 2014 - 8:51 am

          He appears to be making fun of God. Sounds like he doesn’t believe in God. Maybe EMF is his god. Poor guy.

          • #76 by tag team on April 25, 2014 - 8:42 am

            Do we have a doctor and his wife pushing for the irradiation of the kids?

            • #77 by Anonymous on April 25, 2014 - 12:32 pm

              Yes, that is the case.

            • #78 by amateur night on April 25, 2014 - 1:32 pm

              Oh da Bobbsey twins, how purdy.

    • #79 by Anonymous on April 24, 2014 - 12:39 pm

      Well stated Mr. Imbriano.

  41. #80 by Linda on April 27, 2014 - 8:13 pm

    This clip really opened my eyes. I do not believe we are doing what is best for our young children. I think we are doing what is best for industry.

    http://www.newsday.com/long-island/garden-city-s-waldorf-school-takes-no-tech-approach-in-lower-grades-1.7474070

  42. #81 by Joe Imbriano on April 28, 2014 - 7:33 am

    http://www.sharecare.com/health/female-infertility/cell-phone-radiation-affect-fertility

    Check out this slickly produced propaganda diverting attention away from damage to the irreplaceable eggs and instead redirecting it to damaging replaceable sperm. The ovaries are just as close if not closer to the cell phone in the pocket than to the testes. Of course no one mentions the wireless tablets in the classrooms in the laps of little girls-JUST CELL PHONE RADIATION AND THE MEN. At the end of this little propaganda piece, the girl agrees to now carry the phone. Simply brilliant how they work together to keep this sterilization program in full swing. What is the common denominator with all the hirelings in this movement? Is it getting pretty obvious to the rest of you?

    • #82 by Dorothy on April 30, 2014 - 11:49 am

      Mr. Imbriano, I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for what you are doing. It has been a long winter in St Paul and we have been housebound for most of the past several months.

      I am a single mother raising 2 young boys who are addicted to these demon filled video game devices. I try to get them to stop and they get extremely violent with me. This is ruining our family and is destroying my young boys. They don’t want to even go outside when the weather permits anymore. They are up at all hours of the night playing. Their grades have fallen and they have been put on medication as a result of the recommendations of the school officials and their doctor.

      I work two jobs and this is all so horrible. I just can’t believe how these pieces all fit together. I don’t know what to do. I just want to cry all the time. This is such a nightmare.

  43. #83 by Anonymous on April 28, 2014 - 11:26 am

    cellphones and cell towers mimic the electric communication of our cells, stimulating them to commit suicide (in the case of thyroids) or to grow wildly (in the case of cancer.)

  44. #84 by Anonymous on May 1, 2014 - 11:45 pm

    I want to scream right now. Oh my God. This is is horrible.

  45. #85 by Robledo on May 2, 2014 - 10:17 am

    This is some incredibly damning information.

  46. #86 by Great product on May 2, 2014 - 4:59 pm

    Does the portrait mode, with the antenna directed right into the reproductive area, assure that the human ovum is rendered not viable? If so, how devious and sinister.
    Will the children will become infertile while being “educated.” ? Great product.

  47. #87 by 33 degrees of separation on May 2, 2014 - 6:16 pm

    You pegged this thing so now tread lightly.

  48. #88 by Plan of elites or just plain greed? on May 2, 2014 - 10:01 pm

    Here it is: “Population Control & Microwave Radiation”
    by Dr. Magda Havas, B.Sc., Ph.D.,
    Trent University, Peterborough, Canada

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LvSGYU_kG0

  49. #89 by no more babies? on May 2, 2014 - 10:42 pm

    What can we do to save the babies?

    An amoral and ravenous congressional-military-industrial complex has groomed the youngsters of Generation X-ray to become hard-core patriots of wireless technology in the same ruthless way the asbestos and tobacco industries seduced and murdered generations past. The Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA) boasts on its website that teenagers, defined as a “huge consumer market segment,” are currently pumping $100 billion a year into the industry’s coffers.79

    Deceived and used as pawns, our youngsters are left utterly ignorant concerning the devastating wireless radiation hazards to themselves and their posterity. When young people are told about the hazards of anything, they traditionally discard the facts and pursue their chosen avenues of self gratification as predictable acts of rebellion.

    Generation X-ray is no different in its obsession with wireless conveniences; it seems content to live in a self-absorbed universe devoid of logic, critical thinking and accountability. Many youth appear incapable of caring about future generations. We are no longer a nation of healthy free-thinkers, but a nation of obsessive, sickly phone button punchers, virtual game players and compulsive text messengers.

    Given the science, such ignorance and apathy ensures that millions of new and innocent lives are destined for cruel suffering and impairment. Thanks to a silent but violent electromagnetic enemy that is destroying their fragile DNA, newborns tumbling into our barbaric wireless age are creatures of a zillion possibilities of chromosomal disarray, including nervous system damage, deformed limbs, endocrine disruption and unhinged metabolic function.

    Yet, hopefully, some of our young people planning to bear children are still morally and intellectually able to comprehend and act upon the latest scientific information gathered for this paper. We can also hope that older parents and grandparents apprised of these facts will exert their influence to protect the genetics of their progeny. Those who want healthy babies must take the minimal following steps:

    1. Accept the well-documented fact that microwave radiation from wireless devices is as mutagenic, teratogenic and dangerous to fetuses and infants as ionizing X-radiation and gamma waves.

    2. Never wear or use any wireless device near reproductive organs. If you are female and have been exposing your ovaries to years of near-field wireless radiation, think carefully before you decide to become pregnant. If you are a male, and plan to father children, make sure that you stop using wireless devices well in advance of fertilization to reduce the chance of procreation with damaged sperm.

    3. Learn to test your personal environment for wireless microwave contamination. If you are pregnant or plan to be, remove yourself from microwave-contaminated areas at any cost. Never stand near a microwave oven when pregnant, as all such ovens leak radiation and can affect a large area.

    4. Prudent avoidance of routine pregnancy ultrasound scans is the best policy, says Internet health advisor Dr. Joseph Mercola. These scans should be used only in the event of medical necessity, he advises.

    5. Refuse to have your newborn radio-tagged by your birthing hospital. Since a tracking system requires a fog of ambient RF/microwave radiation which could affect even non-tagged infants, it is prudent to choose a hospital which does not employ wireless systems in the maternity ward, or have your baby at home.

    6. Make sure that your infant is nurtured in a microwave-free home. Remove all DECT cordless phones, wireless security systems, wLAN wireless communications systems and microwave ovens. Never microwave-heat infant formulas or food.

    7. Make sure that cell tower or roof top communications antennas are not poisoning your home. If you discover that your neighborhood lies in the down beam of microwave antennas, which are saturating the interior of your home with a dangerous carcinogen, either take steps to apply expensive radiation barrier materials, or move to a radiation-free zone.

    8. Never use any wireless device while near an infant or young child. Drastically reduce the use of all personal wireless devices, and reserve their use for emergency communication. The more people use cell phones in their homes, the more transmitters will be placed in our neighborhoods.

    9. Retain your home and office landlines. Telecom companies are using pricing incentives to encourage the elimination of landline connections because air interface is more profitable. Unless we can educate enough people in time, our options for safe landline communications may vanish, leaving our kids at even more risk.

    The scientific evidence is massive and irrefutable. Our little ones face a lifetime of disability, pain and deprivation from ever-increasing torrents of man-made, commercial radiation capable of destroying human genetic integrity. If you believe that humanity should NOT be reduced to a species of genetic freaks on the way to extinction, assist the radiation awareness movement by doing your own research and then sharing with others the documented information on wireless hazards to human DNA.

    There is no time to waste while confronted with the life-and-death issues associated with the brazen wireless radiation assault upon our kids. Our mission requires persistence, patience and sacrifice. It is high time that we speak up and take action now—for the sake of the helpless and the unborn. What we do and say today will hugely affect generations to come.

    Source: http://www.vaccinetruth.org/microwave.htm

    • #90 by Joe Imbriano on May 3, 2014 - 12:34 am

      Thank you for posting this. The school districts are really heavily involved in all of this. They are the biggest players.

  50. #91 by the epitome on May 3, 2014 - 2:59 pm

    Joe, I think people are too far gone. Not sure if there is hope for these brain dead masses.

    http://www.southsidetvpro.com/2014/01/bill-gates-obama-pope-are-worlds-most.html

  51. #92 by Joe Imbriano on May 3, 2014 - 10:22 pm

    Breaking News

    UK Radiation Research Trust

    Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) member Dr Kjell Hansson Mild has exposed control of science within the SCENIHR group. SCENIHR excluded many studies from the latest scientific review, including five studies by the Hardell Group, published in 2013. Dr. Mild was a co-author with Dr. Hardell. At the same time SCENIHR excluded Dr. Hardell’s and Dr. Mild’s key scientific papers, they promoted Dr. Mild’s participation in SCENIHR as giving balance and transparency to this process. These studies from the Hardell Group are the longest studies on mobile phones and brain cancer. Of even greater significance is Hardell’s conclusion that the proof of mobile phones causing an increase in gliomas — the deadliest of brain tumours, and acoustic neuromas tumours on the auditory nerve.

    The SCENIHR Report fails to do a thorough review of hundreds of papers on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and biological health effects, and excludes literally hundreds of papers containing new information in the field concerning adverse EMR impacts.

    In addition, Lukas Margaritis, Professor Emeritus from the University of Athens and Dr. Adamantia Fragopoulou, forwarded a report to SCENIHR including references to superb research highlighting studies working with everyday use of wireless devices demonstrating serious impacts on oxidative stress induction, learning and memory deficits, fertility reduction and cell death in animal models. These studies are published in high quality peer reviewing journals yet they are still excluded from the SCENIHR report.

    Dr Fragopoulou said, “We have pointed out serious omissions of publications from the SCENIHR opinion during the hearing in Athens on March 27-28 as well as on the uploaded file to SCENIHR. We are expecting to see much more references in the final form of the report.”

    The UK Radiation Research Trust and the Bioinitiative Working Group have raised complaints directly with the Acting Director at the EU Commission and are calling all politicians to raise this issue at the highest level as many lives are at risk and the public has a right to know.

    See letters of complaint from the UK Radiation Research Trust and the Bioinitiative Work Group to John Ryan, Acting Director of the Public Health Directorate at the EU Commission .

    Eileen O’Connor
    Director
    EM Radiation Research Trust
    http://www.radiationresearch.org
    Sent from a hardwired computer
    Description: Description: Description: RRT logos (4)
    The EM Radiation Research Trust is an educational organisation funded by donations. An independent Charity Registered No. 1106304 © The EM Radiation Research Trust 2003-2004

    • #93 by Anonymous on May 4, 2014 - 9:57 pm

      Will someone please explain to me why this information has fallen on deaf ears with your school board? why are they risking our children’s health?

  52. #94 by warning on May 4, 2014 - 10:22 am

    CONSPIRACY THEORY: POPULATION
    CONTROL AND MICROWAVE RADIATION
    by Magda Havas (http://www.magdahavas.com/)
    June 2010. I’ve never paid much attention to conspiracy theories, but then I began to think about it and
    started asking myself “what if” questions.
    What if some elite group believes that we were doing irreversible damage to the planet and that earth
    can not support a growing human population. Indeed this is what many people think so this “what if”
    doesn’t have to be restricted to the thinking of “some elite group”.
    What if this elite group thinks that a more sustainable population would be perhaps 1 billion people
    instead of 6.7 billion and counting. Some think that earth can’t support sustainably more than 500
    million people, but the size is irrelevant for this discussion.
    What if this elite group doesn’t want to kill people outright (not acceptable to those who would die or
    to those who may be next and to those who value human life) and so they have to devise a way to
    reduce the population without letting anyone know that this is their master plan.
    What would they do?
    Well . . . this elite group would do something to interfere with reproduction, something that might
    affect sperm or egg cells. Interesting that we are experiencing a growing concern about infertility in
    western countries. Couples wanting to get pregnant are having difficulty. There are a number of reasons
    for this infertility crisis and one possible contributor is the cell phone.
    We have no idea what cell phones are doing to human egg cells but we have evidence that cell phones
    can interfere with sperm viability, motility, and morphology. The longer a man uses a cell phone the
    greater the damage to sperm. Keeping the cell phone on the hip is a no no if you want to protect your
    sperm cells.
    Wireless laptop computers and now the ipad emit microwave radiation, just like cell phones. These
    computers are held closer to genitals and are used for longer periods than cell phones, so if the cell
    phone doesn’t do the damage required, the wireless laptop computer will.
    To ensure that this damage is done, it is important to expose children to the radiation and one way to do
    this is to get WiFi into schools. This is happening currently with more and more schools wanting to
    install WiFi for all grade levels and in all classes, even those class rooms that don’t have computers.
    And kids need to be exposed at home as well and so the wireless router was invented.
    But what would this elite group do with women who are already pregnant?
    Well, first of all it would be important NOT to let these women know that computers, wireless or
    otherwise, may affect the fetus. Women who worked on computers decades ago had a higher
    miscarriage rate than those who did not use computers so this concept that wireless computers could
    contribute to miscarriage is not entirely implausible. Doctors warm pregnant women to not drink
    alcohol, to not take certain types of medication, and to refrain from smoking yet they don’t warn
    women to avoid exposure to microwave radiation generated by cell phones, by cordless phones or by
    wireless computers.
    But what would this elite group do about children who are already born?
    Well, the DECT baby monitor is a wireless monitor that also generates microwave radiation. It is kept
    close to the crib so the mother can listen to the baby if s/he wakes up. Some monitors come with a clip
    that attaches to the mother’s waist and thus exposes egg cells to microwave radiation to minimize the
    risk of additional pregnancies. This device exposes both the mother and the baby to microwave
    radiation. Indeed it exposes everyone in the home to microwave radiation. Survival of the fittest states
    that the weak will not survive. By weeding out sensitive individuals who are unable to tolerate
    microwave radiation perhaps a new population will emerge and they will be microwave-tolerant.
    But what would this elite group do about those people who don’t use cell phones or wireless
    computers?
    Exposure of those who do not use wireless technology is achieved by blanketing entire communities
    and places that are frequented by large populations with microwaves from City-wide WiFi, WiFi in
    cafes, hotels, airports, and now on airplanes. And if the WiFi doesn’t expose them to enough
    microwave radiation, cell phone antennas can be placed near schools, on office and apartment
    buildings, in church steeples, and some can be disguised as trees. And then there is the really
    powerful Wi-Max antennas with a radius of 50 km. With Wi-Max entire cities can be blanketed with
    microwave radiation.
    Those who live near a military base, an airport, a weather station, or a marine shipping route can be
    exposed to radar that also emits microwave radiation.
    And finally there are the repeaters from satellites and broadcast antennas that can increase exposure to
    radio frequency radiation, a cousin to microwave radiation.
    Closer to home smart meters provide one way to increase microwave exposure in every home. By the
    end of 2010 every home in Ontario will have a smart meter. Already people who have smart meters
    attached to their homes are complaining of ill health.
    With all this microwave exposure a growing population is becoming electrically hypersensitive.
    According to one study, by 2017 50% of the population will complain of symptoms of
    electrosensitivity that include sleeping problems, fatigue, headaches, joint pain, dizziness, nausea,
    anxiety, depression, difficulty with concentration and short-term memory, skin problems and well as
    eye and ear problems like tinnitus. Perhaps you already experience some of these symptoms. And
    these are the lucky ones. The unlucky ones get cancer and die.
    So is this a conspiracy by some elite group trying to reduce the global population or is it just greed and
    stupidity that inadvertently have the same effect?

    http://microondes.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/prof-dr-magda-havas-popullation-control-06-2010-en.pdf

  53. #96 by warning on May 4, 2014 - 11:01 am

    Date: January 11, 2010

    To: Second Open letter to School Boards, Teachers, and Parents

    From: Dr. Magda Havas, B.Sc., Ph.D., Trent University, Peterborough, Canada.

    Re: ALERT: Wireless routers in schools may be harming students and staff

    Very little research has been published on the health effects associated with wireless routers used in schools and on the effects of cell phones on children. Studies have focused entirely on adults and these studies are showing an increased risk of several types of tumors, including tumors of the brain, the eye, the nerve leading to the ear, and the salivary gland with mobile phone use. These tumors appear on the same side of the head used to listen to the cell phone and appear after 10 years of moderate to heavy cell phone use. One of the most recent studies by Hardell and colleagues (2009) reported that the highest risk was for those who started using a mobile phone before the age of 20.

    Other studies are finding an increased cancer rate for those who live within 300 to 400 meters of cell phone antennas. The cancer rates are higher and the cancers grow more rapidly than in populations further from these antennas.

    This is particularly disturbing for the following reasons:

    1. Younger children are beginning to use cell phones and they are much more sensitive to this radiation than adults.

    2. Tumors are developing in adults at a much faster rate than expected with cell phone use and this is likely to be even faster for children whose cells are dividing.

    3. A growing number of schools are installing wireless routers for internet access. The same frequencies are used for wireless routers in schools as are used for mobile phones (cell and cordless phones). These frequencies are between 2.4 and 6 GHz in North America. Consequently children are receiving a double dose of microwave radiation from both wireless routers and mobile phones.

    4. Some of these children may be exposed to wireless routers at home as well and they may be living near cell phone antennas giving them around the clock microwave exposure.

    Studies also are documenting reproductive problems for men who use cell phones. There is a decrease in sperm density, motility, and viability. While sperms are produced every few months, females are born with all of their egg cells and are much more vulnerable to damage as a result. To date there have been no studies on the effects of microwave radiation from mobile phones and wireless computers on egg cells and reproductive success in women.

    The purpose of this open letter is to alert those who are responsible for the health and safety of children to think twice before installing wireless microwave technology in schools and exposing students and staff to radiation that could be potentially harmful.’

    Click here for pdf without live links.

  54. #97 by Anonymous on May 6, 2014 - 3:35 pm

    Sick, evil bastards.

  55. #98 by Anonymous on May 7, 2014 - 2:34 pm

    This is serious business. Very serious.

  56. #99 by Technology curfew on May 9, 2014 - 7:17 am

    “The technology curfew move reportedly aims to discourage children from spending an unhealthy amount of time on electronic devices such as smartphones as well as reduce on-line bullying via instant messaging apps.”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/10718254/Children-in-Japanese-city-banned-from-using-smartphones-after-9pm.html

  57. #100 by "Smart phones and dumb people" on May 9, 2014 - 8:25 am

    “ . . . now the park is so quiet, it gives me a chill . See the children (are) not outside, the swings hanging still. There’s no skipping, no hopscotch, no church and no steeple. We’re a generation of idiots, smart phones, and dumb people.”

    http://sfglobe.com/?id=686

    • #101 by Joe Imbriano on May 9, 2014 - 8:51 am

      The technology and infrastructure are weaponized. Becoming stupid and dehumanized is simply a side effect. These devices along with other wireless devices are the means by which you and most importantly, your children, become exposed to what makes certain that your lineage comes to a screeching halt.

  58. #102 by "Smartphone obsession" on May 9, 2014 - 12:42 pm

  59. #103 by on the list for California on May 10, 2014 - 7:45 am

    and here’s what the daughter had to say to the school board:

    PART 2 – Baer’s Daughter addresses school board after father arrested for violating 2-minute rule

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryVWfATBT9M

    PART 2 – Baer’s Daughter addresses school board after father arrested for violating 2-minute rule

  60. #104 by Mother's day? on May 11, 2014 - 11:21 am

    Calling all moms at Acacia- How can you moms be enjoying your brunch knowing your kids will be back in the radiation rooms with the wireless tablets in their laps at school tomorrow?

    Have you no shame?

  61. #106 by Marina on May 13, 2014 - 6:13 pm

    The very minute you mention the word “agenda”, you lose people. It immediately conjures up the notion of a conspiracy theory. Please try not to discredit yourself. Don’t get me wrong. This information, although being out there on the edge, is very compelling. It really does make sense and I do see the correlations. This is so huge and I don’t think you can stop it. All we can do is protect ourselves and our children.

  62. #107 by circus clown on May 13, 2014 - 10:15 pm

    Still spewing your BS Joe? You are looking more and more like your screws are coming loose. Keep it up and you will just dig your self a deeper hole that you can climb into. You are all alone and nobody cares what you think. Give it up.

    • #108 by Joe Imbriano on May 14, 2014 - 8:37 am

      Besides breaking the law, the real BS is what is coming out of the school district with their false safety assurances along with their bi-weekly dog and pony show using students to promote the students’ very own health demise. That is truly sickening. Attend a board meeting and watch them read prepared statements at the podium glorifying wireless technology. Watch the apple glorification every other Tuesday. We went to the moon with pencil and paper. We are going to hell in a hand basket without them.

      The hole is dug for your children, not mine. Mine are safe. Yours are trapped in the hole being kept there by your desire to deny reality coupled with your selfish need to preserve your empty standard of living with your phony fair weather friends all at the expense of the health of your children. You need prayer.

      Give it up? Not in a million years.

      • #109 by 33 degrees of separation on May 14, 2014 - 11:13 am

        Mr. Imbriano, you are by no means alone. For a word press site, your Alexa stats are remarkable. Your vistors are very engaged in your material. I have found it both fascinating and yet at the same time, extremely alarming.

        This person’s remarks reveal an air of desperation. I sense that they are threatened in some way by what may be at stake for them personally. Pay this person no attention. I wouldn’t even respond to them.

        • #110 by 33 degrees of separation on May 14, 2014 - 1:52 pm

          To be objective, and in the interest of clarity, I have taken the time to set the record straight in terms of who is really paying attention to Mr. Imbriano. The nonsensical comment by “circus clown” warrants a determined response from someone aside from Mr. Imbriano. The following are the stats from Alexa.com. They include the local media in Fullerton California as well as those from your respective local school districts.

          Thefullertoninformer.com

          Global Rank
          1,549,408

          Rank in Australia
          24,693

          Bounce Rate
          31.60%

          Daily Page views per Visitor
          3.9

          Daily Time on Site
          7:27

          These are very solid numbers. You are ahead of your local news outlets. See below:

          Fullertonobserver.com

          Global Rank
          11,059,978

          Bounce Rate- not available

          Daily Page views per Visitor
          1.00

          Daily Time on Site- not available

          Fullertonstories.com

          Global Rank
          3,249,396

          Bounce Rate-not available

          Daily Page views per Visitor
          2.20

          Daily Time on Site
          1:53

          Fullerton Stories.com

          Global Rank
          12,316,048

          Bounce Rate-not available

          Daily Pageviews per Visitor
          1.00

          Daily Time on Site-not available

          Fullertonrag.com

          Global Rank
          4,569,073

          Bounce Rate-not available

          Daily Page views per Visitor
          1.60

          Daily Time on Site-not available

          Fullertontaxpayers.org

          Global rank-not available

          Bounce Rate-not available

          Daily Page views per Visitor-not available

          You are even ahead of your local school districts websites:

          Fullertonsd.org

          Global Rank
          3,318,259

          Bounce Rate-not available

          Daily Page views per Visitor
          2.80

          Daily Time on Site
          2:05

          Fjuhsd.net

          Global Rank
          3,721,296

          Bounce Rate-not available

          Daily Page views per Visitor
          13.00

          Daily Time on Site
          7:27

          To say that no one is listening or that no one cares is a patently false statement. Keep pushing even harder and hit them where it hurts. Hit them in the pocketbook Joe.

          • #111 by Anonymous on May 14, 2014 - 4:37 pm

            Nice. You go Joe!

          • #112 by amatuer night on May 15, 2014 - 5:11 pm

            pretty spiffy Joe

          • #113 by Armen on July 20, 2014 - 11:22 pm

            My children attend school in the LAUSD and there are as many as four access points in some classrooms with 40 kids. The classrooms have mold, leaky faucets, wood rot malfunctioning air conditioners and heaters and the restrooms are a disaster. Many schools are in total disrepair. I am a social worker and if I found these conditions in a family residence, there would be grounds for action against the parents.

            Last year, the kids were getting headaches, getting dizzy and suffering from frequent nosebleeds even when it was raining. The parents here just don’t care. It is hopeless here. I don’t know what can be done for the kids here. It is such a shame. No one is willing to stand up for them, even their own parents.

            • #114 by Anonymous on July 21, 2014 - 3:41 pm

              Parents don’t care about their kids period. If they did, they wouldn’t send them to public school.

  63. #115 by Anonymous on May 14, 2014 - 10:42 am

    Why don’t YOU give it up and stop coming to this website, circus clown. You are a clown because nobody cares about what you have to say, only those who are ignorant morons like yourself. You are such a fool! I hope you don’t have any kids.

    • #116 by jokers wild on May 14, 2014 - 3:35 pm

      Circus clown just won’t have any grandchildren.

  64. #117 by Laura on May 17, 2014 - 8:43 pm

    In disgust I watched another family at a restaurant sitting at the table ALL playing with their phones almost the whole time, ignoring each other. Is this where all this technology is taking us?

  65. #118 by Faye on May 18, 2014 - 11:31 am

    This article does not belong on a church’s facebook page. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    • #119 by Joe Imbriano on May 19, 2014 - 7:16 am

      Fay, I beg to differ and I could fill a seminary doctoral program’s curriculum with Scripture verses and expositions on the horrifying reality of what is really going on. The fact is that over in Anaheim specifically, you were sitting in a $65,000 seat yesterday morning? Was it worth it? You ought to be ashamed of that. They could do a better job with a tent and sawdust on the ground.

      The only thing I am ashamed of is not being able to do more to defend these children. Fortunately, it is never too late to do the right thing. We will prevail with or without the help of the hirelings in the pulpit.

    • #120 by ashamed? on May 19, 2014 - 8:04 am

      Faye,

      What everyone should be ashamed of is turning their backs on the children. This issue is at the very heart of what God is all about. How will we respond? Will we open our heart and mind to this or will we condemn the messenger and tell them they should be ashamed for bringing forth the message?

      Our reaction, inaction to this issue is evidence of God’s presence/non-presence in our life. This is what it all comes down to; this is what it is all about.

  66. #121 by Anonymous on May 18, 2014 - 9:09 pm

    Mr. Imbriano, that was a very nice presentation last week. You really know your stuff.

  67. #122 by Does Gates have his family covered? on May 19, 2014 - 11:34 am

    B25. What are power line “magnetic field cancellation” systems?

    In some cases, the magnetic field exposures from power lines can be reduced with special electronic equipment that measures the existing magnetic field and then produces an opposing field to “cancel out” the magnetic fields within a certain area. These systems are called “Active Magnetic Field Cancellation Systems,” and they were initially used to reduce electromagnetic interference for electron microscopes and other sensitive instruments. Typical costs for the complete design and installation of such a system usually start at around $20,000. Unfortunately for most people, this price is often prohibitive. (Contact our office for more information.)

    Source: http://www.emfcenter.com/emffaqs.htm#B14.%20Are%20there%20different%20kinds%20of%20EMFs%20I%20should%20be%20concerned%20about

  68. #123 by Joe Imbriano on May 28, 2014 - 5:47 pm

    Farewell Ms. Maher
    joe imbriano Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:46 PM
    To: tamara_maher@fsd.k12.ca.us, Robert Pletka , Karen Whisnant , “Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org”

    As you may recall, my wife and I dis-enrolled our five year old daughter along with her older brother and sister from their respective Acacia classrooms class back in November when the superintendent Dr. Robert Pletka refused to provide my daughter and her other two siblings at Acacia access to a public education without constant, unprecedented exposure to wireless devices that emit weapons grade microwave radiation trillions of times normal background levels. The list of experts that warn against chronic wireless exposure to children is substantial. http://wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html

    We do not subject our children to this at home and we did not authorize them to be subjected to this at school. We did not want our children in a room with the equivalent of 30+ kids using their cell phones all day long in direct proximity to their developing brains and sensitive reproductive areas. I removed all four of my children, including my 8th grade son from the Fullerton school district for this precise reason. My wife and I have chosen precaution over what we believe to be Dr. Whisnant’s placation and Dr Pletka’s false assurances of safety for our children.

    We have always appreciated your dedication to the teaching profession and how you set yourself apart from others with your track record of effectiveness. In just the short time you had my daughter, her progress was phenomenal. We can only hope that you, Mrs. Maher, are walking away from a coveted, well paying job, winaith great retirement benefits and long paid vacations for the right reasons. I can only speculate but it is our personal opinion that you, being one of the last truly good teachers at Acacia, could be choosing to follow your conscience. Whether it be the Common Core curriculum or the violations of The California education code which prohibits the introduction of potential human carcinogens such as wireless radiation emissions into a K-8 classroom, I know your decision was made with painstaking care. Wireless radiation is a potential human carcinogen according to the World Health Organization.

    You will no longer see our banners out at the drop off in the mornings as whatever has driven you from your vocation will preclude you from doing so. However, the parents and staff will continue to see them in the days, weeks and months ahead until the school district stops the deployment of these very powerful wireless access points and WiFi enabled devices on our children. The following are just a few of many links to the websites that you and the parents have been told to ignore:

    http://www.nacst.org NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN AND SAFE TECHNOLOGY

    http://www.fcsst.com FULLERTON COMMUNITY FOR SAFE SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY

    http://thefullertoninformer.com/category/forced-irradiation-of-school-children/ THE FULLERTON INFORMER

    http://wifiinschools.com/ WIFI IN SCHOOLS

    Ms. Maher, no amount of money, job security, paid vacation or parental worship is worth the mental, physical or reproductive health of our children. I am glad to see that you can wash your hands of what has transpired at Acacia, whatever your reasons for leaving, I believe the reasons to be noble.

    May the road rise with you in your future endeavors. May the wind be at your back as you walk the winding road of life wherever it may lead you. Thank you for the time you spent with my daughter and all of the children that you have helped every step of the way in your career at Acacia. It is truly tragic that they have reinvented the wheel with Common Core to the detriment of the children and have chosen to deliver it with potentially dangerous microwave emissions.

    We firmly believe that the wireless common core classroom is not a safe place for children much less for the staff. Ms. Maher, regardless of whether or not you agree with our position as parents, my wife and I still wish you the very best

    Yours truly,

    Joe and Lisa Imbriano

    site admin

    http://thefullertoninformer.com/

  69. #124 by Anonymous on May 30, 2014 - 3:24 pm

    How can these people be so blind?

  70. #125 by Anonymous on May 30, 2014 - 5:06 pm

    The Who fact sheet is meaningless. The EPA tried to classify RF as a class 1 human carcinogen and had their jurisdiction removed and handed to the FCC which is in the hands of the telecom industries.
    The Class 2B was a compromise, there are many industry insiders at foot within the ranks of the WHO. Cognitive dissonance won’t save anybody from a brain tumor or their children from autism or infertility. This is microwave RADIATION. Key word, “RADIATION” you can parse words, sow doubt but in the end it is still the same carcinogen. Other Class 2B’s are lead, chloroform, DDT etc..

    • #126 by Sundip on May 31, 2014 - 10:45 am

      Adverse biological effects have been observed at power levels ten thousand times lower than FCC exposure guidelines. Science is there for those who look for studies. The telecom and wireless industries both have extremely powerful lobbyists who have successfully managed to convince lawmakers to ignore studies.

      Finally in India, we have made some headway in reversing what has been done to people. Antennae are being removed from buildings and schools. Schools are turning off WiFi altogether. The population reduction hypothesis is very plausible indeed. Many high level people share the similar worldview which is elitist and radically environmentalist.

  71. #127 by Anonymous on May 31, 2014 - 6:01 pm

    The telecommunications act of 1996 was written without any protections for WiFi or WiFi enabled devices. Schools, businesses, and cities are afforded no immunity from damages. These systems need to be turned of immediately. This will make asbestos look like a walk in the park. The largest trial bar in the world has already weighed in on this issue. I believe you may have done an article on this some time ago if my memory serves me correctly.

  72. #128 by They Knew on June 2, 2014 - 12:04 pm

    THEY KNEW!
    Corporate Governments have covered up RF and Microwave hazards for 60 years.

    1950′s: Researchers conducted experiments on the effects of microwave radiation. Their report contained this statement: “If this paper becomes known around the world, it will threaten military and commercial investments.” [WEEP News Aug 28/10]

    1960′s: Studies conducted on the effects of microwaves on DNA. [Penn State University Jan 20/01]

    Prior to July 1971: More than 2,300 documents show Bioeffects of Radio Frequency Radiation.

    “By 1971 we knew everything that needed to be known,” says microwave weapons expert Barrie Trower.

    1972: U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute documents detrimental health effects from microwave and radio-frequency radiation.

    1976: Summary of U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency research warns of lack of concentration, menstrual disorders, headaches and irritability following microwave exposure. The Pentagon report adds: “This should be kept secret to preserve industrial profit.”

    By late 1998: It was known that blood cells exposed to cell phone radiation suffer genetic damage, forming micronuclei at absorption levels below the government’s “safety” guidelines. Micronuclei are fragmented cells that can no longer repair themselves and are considered to be “biological markers” for cancer. [one-tcn.com June 18/10]

    1999: Health Canada commissioned the Royal Society of Canada to review of the health risks associated with wireless communication devices. The nation’s top peer-reviewed scientists found biological health effects from the resulting microwave radiation – including the specific frequencies currently used in Wi-Fi school classrooms – at levels well below established “safe” guidelines. [WEEP News Aug 28/10]

    2003: British researchers demonstrated that cell phone radiation changes the shape of brain proteins, causing them to clump together and form pathological protein fibrils like those found in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

  73. #129 by Ramesh on June 5, 2014 - 5:11 pm

    I have followed your logic and have arrived at similar conclusions. The following links would be of great interest to your contributing editors:

    http://medcitynews.com/2012/07/investors-back-female-fertility-treatment-that-may-re-energize-eggs-using-stem-cells/

    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/06/29/1206600109.full.pdf+html

    Incidentally, who will have access to this particular technology? At what point will it, if ever, become readily available? At what cost will it be made available?

  74. #130 by Joe Imbriano on June 10, 2014 - 12:45 pm

    [ Back to EurekAlert! ]

    PUBLIC RELEASE DATE: 9-Jun-2014
    [ Print | E-mail ] Share Share [ Close Window ]

    Contact: Eleanor Gaskarth
    e.f.gaskarth@exeter.ac.uk
    44-782-730-9332
    University of Exeter
    Mobile phones negatively affect male fertility, new study suggests

    Men who keep a mobile phone in their trouser pocket could be inadvertently damaging their chances of becoming a father, according to a new study led by the University of Exeter.

    Previous research has suggested that Radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) emitted by the devices can have a detrimental effect on male fertility. Most of the global adult population own mobile phones, and around 14% of couples in high and middle income countries have difficulty conceiving.

    A team led by Dr Fiona Mathews, of Biosciences at the University of Exeter, conducted a systematic review of the findings from ten studies, including 1,492 samples, with the aim of clarifying the potential role of this environmental exposure.

    Participants in the studies were from fertility clinics and research centres, and sperm quality was measured in three different ways: motility (the ability of sperm to move properly towards an egg), viability (the proportion of sperm that were alive) and concentration (the number of sperm per unit of semen).

    In control groups, 50-85% of sperm have normal movement. The researchers found this proportion fell by an average of 8 percentage points when there was exposure to mobile phones. Similar effects were seen for sperm viability. The effects on sperm concentration were less clear.

    Dr Mathews said: “Given the enormous scale of mobile phone use around the world, the potential role of this environmental exposure needs to be clarified. This study strongly suggests that being exposed to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation from carrying mobiles in trouser pockets negatively affects sperm quality. This could be particularly important for men already on the borderline of infertility, and further research is required to determine the full clinical implications for the general population.”

    The results were consistent across in vitro studies conducted under controlled conditions and observational in vivo studies conducted on men in the general population.

    “Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Fiona Mathews et al is published today in the journal Environment International.

    ###

    • #131 by Joe Imbriano on June 10, 2014 - 12:47 pm

      The eggs are really what are in the cross hairs. Ladies and gentlemen, protect your daughters. They are born with a finite number of eggs which are the longest lived haploid cells in their bodies THAT ARE NOT CAPABLE OF REPAIRING THEMSELVES.

  75. #132 by Joe Imbriano on June 10, 2014 - 12:48 pm

    Radiation from mobile phones causing ‘infertility’ among men: Study

    Kounteya Sinha,Times of India, Jun 10, 2014

    LONDON: Radiation emitting from mobile phones kept in trouser pockets has now been confirmed to be causing male infertility.

    British scientists announced on Tuesday that men who keep a mobile phone in their trouser pocket could be inadvertently damaging their chances of becoming a father, thanks to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) emitted by the devices.

    Most of the global adult population own mobile phones, and around 14% of couples in high and middle income countries have difficulty conceiving. Dr Fiona Mathews at the University of Exeter conducted a systematic review of the findings from 10 studies, including 1,492 samples, with the aim of clarifying the potential role of this environmental exposure.

    Participants in the studies were from fertility clinics and research centres, and sperm quality was measured in three different ways: motility (the ability of sperm to move properly towards an egg), viability (the proportion of sperm that were alive) and concentration (the number of sperm per unit of semen). In control groups, 50-85% of sperm have normal movement.

    The researchers found this proportion fell by an average of 8 percentage points when there was exposure to mobile phones.

    Similar effects were seen for sperm viability. The effects on sperm concentration were less clear.

    Dr Mathews said, “Given the enormous scale of mobile phone use around the world, the potential role of this environmental exposure needs to be clarified. This study strongly suggests that being exposed to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation from carrying mobiles in trouser pockets negatively affects sperm quality. This could be particularly important for men already on the borderline of infertility, and further research is required to determine the full clinical implications for the general population.”

    The results were consistent across in vitro studies conducted under controlled conditions and observational in vivo studies conducted on men in the general population.

    India’s Inter Ministerial Group recently made some salient recommendations about mobile handsets.

    The group proposed revising the limit of 2 watts per kilogram averaged over 10 grams tissue to 1.6 watts per kilogram averaged over 1 gram tissue. It also called for mandatory declaration of radiation level on each mobile handset. As far as mobile towers are concerned they recommended radiation norms which are ten times as strict as the existing ones- from f/200 watts per square meter to f/2000 watts per square meter.

    The group said mobile towers should not be installed near high density residential areas, schools, playgrounds and hospitals.

    “The localized specific absorption rate (SAR) value as per the Indian guidelines is 2 watt per kg, averaged over a six minute period and using a 10 gram average mass. With higher SAR — a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by the body while using a phone of mobile handsets — the public could potentially receive much higher radiofrequency exposure. We have recommended that SAR levels to be lowered to 1.6 watt/kg, as prescribed by the Federal Communication Commission of US,” Indian experts said.

    Girish Kumar, professor in department of electrical engineering at IIT Bombay, whose research on hazards of cellphone use was taken as a reference for the committee decision, said, “There is a 40% increase in the risk of brain cancer among teenagers using cell phones for long periods. The younger the child, the deeper is the penetration of electromagnetic radiation as children’s skulls are thinner”.

    Another Jawaharlal Nehru University study found that the exposure to radiation from mobile towers and cell phones could have an adverse impact on male fertility and pose health hazards by depleting the defence mechanism of cells.

    http://bit.ly/1s36WwW

    Contact: Eleanor Gaskarth
    e.f.gaskarth@exeter.ac.uk
    44-782-730-9332
    University of Exeter

    Mobile phones negatively affect male fertility, new study suggests

    Press Release, EurekAlert, Jun 9, 2014
    Men who keep a mobile phone in their trouser pocket could be inadvertently damaging their chances of becoming a father, according to a new study led by the University of Exeter.

    Previous research has suggested that Radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) emitted by the devices can have a detrimental effect on male fertility. Most of the global adult population own mobile phones, and around 14% of couples in high and middle income countries have difficulty conceiving.

    A team led by Dr Fiona Mathews, of Biosciences at the University of Exeter, conducted a systematic review of the findings from ten studies, including 1,492 samples, with the aim of clarifying the potential role of this environmental exposure.

    Participants in the studies were from fertility clinics and research centres, and sperm quality was measured in three different ways: motility (the ability of sperm to move properly towards an egg), viability (the proportion of sperm that were alive) and concentration (the number of sperm per unit of semen).

    In control groups, 50-85% of sperm have normal movement. The researchers found this proportion fell by an average of 8 percentage points when there was exposure to mobile phones. Similar effects were seen for sperm viability. The effects on sperm concentration were less clear.

    Dr Mathews said: “Given the enormous scale of mobile phone use around the world, the potential role of this environmental exposure needs to be clarified. This study strongly suggests that being exposed to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation from carrying mobiles in trouser pockets negatively affects sperm quality. This could be particularly important for men already on the borderline of infertility, and further research is required to determine the full clinical implications for the general population.”

    The results were consistent across in vitro studies conducted under controlled conditions and observational in vivo studies conducted on men in the general population.

    “Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Fiona Mathews et al is published today in the journal Environment International.

    http://bit.ly/1lkZN5E

    Although I could not locate the Environment International review paper discussed in the above news reports, I found r recently published review paper in Andrology.

    Liu K, Li Y, Zhang G, Liu J, Cao J, Ao L, Zhang S. Association between mobile phone use and semen quality: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Andrology. 2014 Apr 3. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00205.x. [Epub ahead of print].
    Possible hazardous health effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiations emitted from mobile phone on the reproductive system have raised public concern in recent years. This systemic review and meta-analysis was prepared following standard procedures of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and checklist. Relevant studies published up to May 2013 were identified from five major international and Chinese literature databases: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, the VIP database and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library. Eighteen studies with 3947 men and 186 rats were included in the systemic review, of which 12 studies (four human studies, four in vitro studies and four animal studies) with 1533 men and 97 rats were used in the meta-analyses. Systemic review showed that results of most of the human studies and in vitro laboratory studies indicated mobile phone use or radiofrequency exposure had negative effects on the various semen parameters studied. However, meta-analysis indicated that mobile phone use had no adverse effects on semen parameters in human studies. In the in vitro studies, meta-analysis indicated that radiofrequency radiation had detrimental effect on sperm motility and viability in vitro [pooled mean difference (MDs) (95% CI): -4.11 (-8.08, -0.13), -3.82 (-7.00, -0.65) for sperm motility and viability respectively]. As for animal studies, radiofrequency exposure had harmful effects on sperm concentration and motility [pooled MDs (95% CI): -8.75 (-17.37, -0.12), -17.72 (-32.79, -2.65) for sperm concentration and motility respectively]. Evidence from current studies suggests potential harmful effects of mobile phone use on semen parameters. A further multicentred and standardized study is needed to assess the risk of mobile phone use on the reproductive system.

    http://1.usa.gov/TFWKeq

    That cell phone radiation appears to damage sperm and contribute to male infertility is old news; however, it has not been not widely reported in the U.S: or in Europe: See the following news reports:

    BREAKING: Cell phones could hurt your sperm
    Markham Heid, Men’s Health, August 16, 2011
    http://bit.ly/1jipv6M

    Report: Cell phone use could reduce sperm count
    Dong Ngo, CNET, August 18, 2011
    This article was translated and reported by more than 100 news web sites including 69 in China and 26 in Indonesia.
    http://cnet.co/1lkVLdE

    Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
    Director, Center for Family and Community Health
    School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
    Center: http://cfch.berkeley.edu

    Electromagnetic Radiation Safety

    Website: http://www.saferemr.com
    Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/SaferEMR
    News Releases: http://pressroom.prlog.org/jmm716/
    Twitter: @berkeleyprc

  76. #133 by Joe Imbriano on June 10, 2014 - 2:42 pm

    Here is the abstract and selected excerpts from the review paper cited in today’s news …

    Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Jessica A. Adams, Tamara S. Galloway,Debapriya Mondal, Sandro C. Esteves, Fiona Mathews. Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environment International. 80 (2014):106-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.015

    Highlights

    • The potential role of mobile phone exposure on sperm quality needs to be clarified.
    • A systematic review was done followed by a meta-analysis using random effects models.
    • Mobile phone exposure was associated with reduced sperm motility and viability.
    • No effect on concentration was apparent.

    Abstract

    Mobile phones are owned by most of the adult population worldwide. Radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from these devices could potentially affect sperm development and function. Around 14% of couples in high- and middle-income countries have difficulty conceiving, and there are unexplained declines in semen quality reported in several countries. Given the ubiquity of mobile phone use, the potential role of this environmental exposure needs to be clarified. A systematic review was therefore conducted, followed by meta-analysis using random effects models, to determine whether exposure to RF-EMR emitted from mobile phones affects human sperm quality. Participants were from fertility clinic and research centres. The sperm quality outcome measures were motility, viability and concentration, which are the parameters most frequently used in clinical settings to assess fertility.

    We used ten studies in the meta-analysis, including 1492 samples. Exposure to mobile phones was associated with reduced sperm motility (mean difference − 8.1% (95% CI − 13.1, − 3.2)) and viability (mean difference − 9.1% (95% CI − 18.4, 0.2)), but the effects on concentration were more equivocal. The results were consistent across experimental in vitro and observational in vivo studies. We conclude that pooled results from in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that mobile phone exposure negatively affects sperm quality. Further study is required to determine the full clinical implications for both sub-fertile men and the general population.

    Excerpts

    Overall, 10 suitable studies were identified, and these included data on 1492 samples. The number of papers included in each meta-analysis varied according to the sperm parameters reported: 9 provided data on motility, 6 provided data on concentration and 5 provided data on viability. All in vitro studies were experimental and all in vivo studies were observational. Two studies of healthy donors included only normozoospermic individuals, that is men with all semen parameters within normal ranges according to the WHO criteria (WHO, 1999). The exposure rates for the in vitro studies are reported in Table 1. All used frequencies of 850–900MHz,with the exception of one study (De Iuliis et al., 2009); SAR, where reported was in the range 1–2; and duration of exposure ranged from 5 min to 16 h, with four of the studies using a duration of 1 h. Exposure rates were not assessed or reported in the epidemiological studies conducted in vivo.
    Mobile phone exposure appears to affect at least two of the most widely-used indices for assessing sperm quality (WHO, 2010). Sperm motility is estimated to be approximately 8% lower in exposed than non-exposed groups. Alone, the clinical importance of an effect of this size may be limited to subfertile men or those at the lower-end of the normal spectrum. However, mobile phone exposure may form part of a cumulative effect of modern day environmental exposures, that collectively reduce sperm quality and explain current trends in infertility. For example, recent evidence found wi-fi from laptops also negatively affected sperm quality (Avendano et al., 2012). A better understanding of the collective influence of environmental factors on sperm quality, and subsequently fertility, will help to improve treatment, advice and support for individuals seeking fertility treatment.

    Although the subject of high-profile media attention, the number of available studies on mobile phone exposure and sperm quality is limited. Additional studies, particularly those which assess viability and other sperm parameters, including morphology and subcellular sperm damage such as sperm DNA integrity (not assessed during conventional semen analyses), are required. This would improve the precision of the estimated effect sizes, and allow better judgement of the likely clinical importance of the findings.

    The period of exposure is likely to affect semen quality, as has been demonstrated in other species (Mailankot et al., 2009), and the intensity of exposure is also likely to be important. The exposures observed in the in vivo studies are constrained by the legal limits placed on SARs for mobile phones ( ICNIRP, 1998), and data on the maximum SARs for each phone model are available. However, every device has fluctuating SARs, so better methods of monitoring participant exposure levels are urgently required. Long term in vivo studies using standardised levels and periods of exposure, ideally a randomized controlled trial in the general population, is needed to assess the importance of mobile phone exposure to public health. The hypotheses of different thermal and non-thermal effects of RF-EMR on sperm quality also need to be tested. It would be helpful to compare the effects of intermittent exposure (where thermal effects are likely to be small) with continuous exposure to the same total amount of RF-EMR, as has been previously investigated in work on damage to DNA in human fibroblasts from mobile phones (Diem et al., 2005).

    Our analyses indicate negative associations between mobile phone exposure on sperm viability and motility. The effects on concentration are more equivocal. Further research is required to quantify these effects more precisely and to evaluate the clinical importance of the risk to both sub-fertile men and the general population.

  77. #134 by Sims on June 18, 2014 - 8:11 am

    Great blog Joe. Here is an excellent article on just how things are not as they appear. A must read.

    http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/06/18/understanding-the-tyranny-of-terrorism-2/

  78. #135 by Joe Imbriano on June 19, 2014 - 8:36 am

    The irony he speaks, and the agendas he speaks of speak volumes.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xjt9Pi5Dz_A

    25 years ago this week, I was a graduate in that audience in Aldrich Park at UCI. It was a hot day under a clear blue sky. http://articles.latimes.com/1989-06-18/local/me-3938_1_graduates-uc-irvine-anteater Ironically, the subject of the commencement speech at that time was George Orwell’s 1984. 25 years later we are there.

    I would have never thought we would be where we are with the wireless agenda, our children, and all of us a quarter of a century later. The hour is late ladies and gentlemen-http://thefullertoninformer.com/the-wireless-agenda-purloining-their-fecundity-the-next-generation-betrayed-enslaved-and-ending-up-depraved/

    • #136 by a mom on June 20, 2014 - 10:42 pm

      Wow Joe! Hats off to you 25 years later and fight on. I’m a Trojan but can stop to smell the roses with an anteater once in a while. Love your article. Simply amazing and so true.

  79. #137 by Anonymous on June 19, 2014 - 7:12 pm

    crazy shit

  80. #138 by Jason on June 22, 2014 - 8:58 am

    Mr. Imbriano, both you and Mr. Abrell gave an amazing interview. This is a very crucial issue.

    http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/06/21/cio-interview-6-killing-our-children-softly/
    God bless you both.

    • #139 by Anonymous on June 23, 2014 - 1:34 pm

      Great interview. Joe you really need to get a better phone connection next time.

  81. #141 by Anonymous on June 23, 2014 - 10:48 am

    I guess you may have come across reports in the UK media in the last few days of a 300% increase in the incidence of Crohn’s disease in the last ten years. See http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/crohns-disease-hospital-admissions-surge-300-because-of-junk-food-and-antibiotics-9548524.html
    Possible explanations are given are the rise in the use of antibiotics and the availability of junk food, but the evidence that this is responsible is thin and does not correspond well to the time-scale of ten years. It fits better with our increased exposure to microwaves such as that from mobile phones and WiFi, which has increased dramatically in the last ten years.

    The likely mechanisms are electromagnetically induced inflammation, as Olle has pointed out on many occasions ). It also increases the permeability of the blood/gut barrier (similar to the blood brain barrier in that it is opened by weak electromagnetic fields) to allow foreign materials from the gut and partially digested food to enter the bloodstream to generate antibodies to them and trigger an auto immune response.

    For example, according to Arrieta et al.(2006) Gut 55 1512-1520, alterations in the permeability of the gut barrier has been linked to several autoimmune diseases including Crohns disease, celiac disease, multiple sclerosis, irritable bowel syndrome and type-1 diabetes. It’s interesting that no one in the media seems to want to mention our increasingly dangerous electromagnetic environment as being a likely cause of so much ill health. These are some of many reasons for wanting to remove WiFi from schools and everywhere else for that matter. I hope this helps your campaign.

  82. #142 by Joe Imbriano on June 23, 2014 - 11:14 pm

    This just in from Dr. Joel Moskowitz up at UC Berkely:

    FCC Review of Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits

    A colleague who attended the recent BioEM 2014 meeting informed me that he learned from FCC employees that a decision on the review of the FCC cell phone radiation exposure limit will not likely occur soon even though an FCC employee has almost completed a summary of the 20,000-plus pages of comments submitted to the FCC on this issue.

    Meanwhile, representatives of the CTIA–The Wireless Association, the IEEE, and ICNIRP have been holding regular high-level meetings at the FCC lobbying for “harmonization” of the exposure limits. Harmonization is the industry’s buzz word for getting the U.S. to weaken the exposure limit to the more permissive ICNIRP (so-called) “international” standard.

    What’s wrong with the U.S. and the ICNIRP cell phone radiation exposure limits?
    http://bit.ly/1izRELU

  83. #143 by Richard Dwyer on June 24, 2014 - 7:51 pm

    • #144 by Joe Imbriano on June 24, 2014 - 11:06 pm

      Yes and tonight the Fullerton School District board of Trustees were once again presented with why they shouldn’t continue on the wrong path that they have chosen for the 14,000 kids and employees who are being forcibly exposed to microwave emissions trillions of times what we were exposed to as children just so they can use an Ipad.

      Well the good news is school is out for the summer and the current wireless exposure is for the most part voluntary. It is now all at the hands of their parents who are either misinformed or are continuing to remain in denial. I believe their quality of life remains consistent with the utilization of these pulse modulated microwave emitting electronic babysitters and the 9 month a year taxpayer funded common core microwave matrix electronic sardine can classrooms run by servile statists.
      Doors open back up in the fall.

      Regardless, we will continue to blow the lid off of this agenda rain or shine, come hell or high water. Human fertility hangs in the precarious balance.

    • #145 by penchant for change on June 25, 2014 - 9:57 am

      One is left scratching their head after perusing this particular article. The school officials’ decisions are not logical by any means. Digital dementia is setting in with these children and it is more than likely irreversible. A host of other chronic neurological, endocrine and reproductive harms await an entire generation that remains on this course.

      Microwave weaponry research out of the Eastern Bloc countries spanning decades sternly warns against what is being done in the name of education. The works of Dr. Barry Trower might be a wise addition to your research. I don’t believe his works are mentioned on this site.

      The deployment of this technology is at the very least an affront to the children, if not a direct assault. I tend to agree with Mr. Imbriano’s assessment of what is happening. He has done a magnificent job of bringing to light what has been hidden right in all of our faces.

  84. #146 by Jenny on June 26, 2014 - 1:08 pm

    This is not good. No one is talking about any of this and the kids treat these things like toys. They are not toys.

  85. #147 by Anonymous on June 29, 2014 - 1:11 pm

    Carl Sagan on the dangers of not questioning new technology
    A Science Icon Died 17 Years Ago. In His Last Interview, He Made A Warning That Gives Me Goosebumps.
    http://smartmeternewsupdates.wordpress.com/2014/06/06/carl-sagan-on-the-dangers-of-not-questioning-new-technology/

    • #148 by Anonymous on June 30, 2014 - 6:15 pm

      Where did you get the photos of the Apple headquarters?

  86. #149 by Hannah on June 30, 2014 - 10:53 pm

    There is much buzz here in Sydney about this article. There is much controversy surrounding wireless radiation. Your information adds much fuel to the fire.

  87. #150 by Joe Imbriano on June 30, 2014 - 11:35 pm

    This solves the entire problem in the schools right here:

    http://rbth.com/science_and_tech/2014/06/30/russian_firms_li-fi_internet_solution_winning_foreign_client_37805.html

    Solving the problem in schools is possible assuming that there is not an agenda to affect fertility, which I believe that there clearly is-

    This whole thing reminds me of when they used to put tetra ethyl lead in the gasolines instead of engineering hardened valve seats into the heads of the gasoline internal combustion engines.They knew back then that lead was an IQ reducer and they have known for decades that pulsed wireless microwave radiation effects fertility. That is why, I believe these devices have made their way into the laps of every school age child in America. It is being forced on them by the school district officials with the blessings of, the complete cooperation of, and permission of the parents. Heck even the PTA and a local paper here in the OC has gotten in on the action fundraising for the deployment of these wireless devices heading straight for the children’s laps all the way down to the 5 year olds. Ladies and gentlemen, these children are born with a finite number of eggs which have no repair mechanisms. Open your eyes before your grandchildren become visible only if you close them.

  88. #153 by Shane on July 1, 2014 - 5:04 pm

    “Bill Gates pledges 10 billion dollars to vaccines over the next decade and declares this to be the decade of vaccines.”

    No one is looking at his involvement in making this the decade of wireless with the X box and his common core involvement. Joe you nailed this thing.

  89. #154 by Anonymous on July 5, 2014 - 11:55 am

    I see it. It is right in front of your eyes. These people are pure evil.

  90. #155 by Anonymous on July 6, 2014 - 7:14 am

    The world is extremely overpopulated. If you would step out of your yuppie bubble, you would see the abject poverty, misery and despair that is the result. Wake up before it envelopes us all.

    • #156 by Step up? on July 7, 2014 - 3:50 pm

      Even if you believe that, personally, it is not up to you or anyone else to play God. Maybe you should step up and be included in the depopulation numbers, eh?

  91. #157 by Joe Imbriano on July 7, 2014 - 11:37 pm

    Public Health Impacts of Wireless Radiation — Flying Blind

    Devra Davis, Ph.D., Huffington Post, Jul 7, 2014

    As uses and users of wireless transmitting devices are skyrocketing in our homes, schools and even our national parks, one would think that scientific research on the human health and environmental implications of wireless electromagnetic radiation would be exploding with fierce competition. Yet as I write this blog fresh from the Capetown South Africa meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, research funding and training in this field is at its lowest point in modern history in both the government and private sector. Motorola’s once vaunted laboratory is no more.
    The society awarded its highest accolade to Environmental Protection Agency Senior Scientist Carl Blackman at the meeting. EPA’s most distinguished and prolific investigator in the field, Blackman retired just two days after receiving the D’Arsonval Medal. Blackman explained that funds for research in this field at EPA had been wiped out.

    This is a tragedy for the field and bespeaks an unfortunate policy direction. Despite the extraordinary growth in wireless transmitting devices, we lack the resources to study their impacts in any systematic way. The absence of research on the health or environmental impacts of wireless radiation should not be confused with proof of safety.

    Other presentations highlighted the exciting new field of electro-ceuticals — where electric current is being applied to treat a range of diseases including cancer. Thus, the biological impact of electromagnetic fields is not in dispute. The meeting also heard presentations showing that cows, bats and carp orient their bodies along lines that reflect the earth’s magnetic field. When asked what this might mean for mammalian migration and even for human health, Uwe Bregger, the animal ecologist who presented this work, quipped, “I would certainly never live near a wireless tower.”

    The issue of exposures to towers is one of many on which we simply have no serious research underway, despite growing public concerns.

    The last national survey on exposures to electromagnetic fields in America took place in 1980. Standards for cell phones were set 18 years ago. Would you fly in an airplane that met old safety standards? While the Israelis have established a national institute to evaluate wireless transmitting devices, no serious research is underway in the U.S., excepting one large animal study that was first proposed 14 years ago. In fact, this past week researchers in China published a study on pregnant women planning to have an abortion. Those results are mindboggling: Women with the highest exposures to electromagnetic fields had much smaller embryos.

    Conspicuously missing from the Bioelectromagnetics meeting are young students from America. Frank Barnes, member of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering, and mentor to a generation of students, has no funding to continue his groundbreaking work at the University of Colorado showing the impacts of magnetic fields on experimental variability. In 2008, he chaired the committee that presented a National Research Council Report, “The Identification of Research Needs Relating to Potential Biological or Adverse Health Effects of Wireless Communications Devices,” as requested by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, identifying research gaps and the critical need to increase our understanding of any potential adverse effects of long term chronic exposure to RF energy on children and pregnant woman. That report identified several important data gaps — none of which has been addressed in the meantime.

    When will the U.S. take action on these recommendations? What research continues in the states appears to be that which cannot be publicly discussed sponsored by the Department of Defense. While none would dispute the value and importance of devising non-lethal uses of electromagnetic weapons, this is one of the few areas where research continues.

    One notable instance where the public is poorly informed about the need to promote safer uses involves the rapid proliferation of tablets such as iPads. These devices are tested at a distance of 20 centimeters from a large male adult body. Indeed, tablets are well-named — they belong on tables and not on tables.

    Manufacturers advise that tablets can exceed the “as-tested levels” when held next to the pregnant abdomen or gonads, especially those of children. Yet, advertisements on television and print — include lovely ads of the Pottery Barn — tout these products for use by young expectant people holding them close to the body. Of course, these devices also are not tested for use directly against small elementary school students who nowadays hold them tightly to their small frames, often seated with their young organs directly exposed. Recently medical doctors Maya Shetreet-Klein and Hugh Taylor have brought attention through the Baby Safe Project to the fact that pregnancy is a time when special precautions should be taken to keep wireless exposures as low as as reasonably achievable (ALARA)

    Our ability to study any of these phenomena is hampered by the lack of funds that propelled Blackman to leave a field he had helped create nearly four decades earlier. Professor Emeritus Barnes rues the situation: “If a young investigator comes to me seeking to work in this field, I have to advise them of the facts. We have no money. There are no incentives to proceed. They are better advised to chose another career focus.”

    As the former director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, I had to offer similar counsel to students and young faculty.

    We can fix this problem. Here’s a solution every grandparent can support. The U.S. and the European Union need to implement a five-year program of a dollar-a-phone fee to be paid equally by phone manufacturers, cell providers and consumers to generate funding to train physicians, biomedical researchers and engineers, provide independent research funding, and support monitoring and evaluation of the potential impacts of cell phones and other wireless transmitting devices on our health.

    Blackman’s retirement is an omen. We have already lost one generation of researchers — as he recounted. We must invest in ensuring that our growing and important electromagnetic technologies are used and developed to be as safe as possible. Assuming things are safe until we have incontrovertible evidence they are not — as happened with tobacco and asbestos — is not a path we can afford to take.

    At this point, our failure to develop evidence of harm cannot be regarded as proof of safety.

    http://huff.to/1vT1ppd

    Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
    Director, Center for Family and Community Health
    School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
    Center: http://cfch.berkeley.edu

    Electromagnetic Radiation Safety

    Website: http://www.saferemr.com
    Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/SaferEMR
    News Releases: http://pressroom.prlog.org/jmm716/
    Twitter: @berkeleyprc

    • #158 by Joe Imbriano on July 7, 2014 - 11:43 pm

      I beg to disagree with her title “flying blind” To the contrary-it should read “flying according to the flight path and ahead of schedule”.

      So they cut off the funding for research, ram this wireless down our throats, get the kids addicted to the crap at home, and strap it to our kids’ ovaries in the classrooms? It is designed to sterilize our children. The reason that the funds for research and the labs are no more is that for decades they have known with precision exactly what this stuff does. Why do you think the frequencies chosen, the infrastructure and the devices are what they are and are being deployed the way that they are. It is all by design. They just don’t want you or I to find out what they already know.

      This is an agenda plain and simple ladies and gentlemen. The whole thing is in your face. Protect your children folks.

      • #159 by more funding . . . . on July 8, 2014 - 6:19 am

        No more funding is needed, we have enough evidence that these exposures are killing all living organisms. WiFi must come out of the schools, NOW!

        It’s that simple.

  92. #160 by Joe Imbriano on July 7, 2014 - 11:52 pm

    This occasional column explores topics covered in Science Times 25 years ago to see what has changed — and what has not.

    Everywhere in the modern world, the throb of alternating current generates electromagnetic waves — from the television, the blender, the light bulbs, the wires in the wall.

    Because the oscillations are very slow (just 60 hertz, or cycles per second), this type of radiation is called “extremely low-frequency.” It was long thought harmless because it is too weak to knock out electrons and directly damage molecules in the body.

    But on July 11, 1989, Science Times reported the uncomfortable possibility that this ubiquitous background radiation might cause cancer.

    Continue reading the main story
    RELATED COVERAGE

    Time Travel: Crystals in the SkyMARCH 3, 2014
    Time Travel: Gauging the Intelligence of InfantsAPRIL 7, 2014
    An epidemiological study comparing children in Denver who died of cancer from 1950 to 1973 with a control group of other children found that those who lived near electrical distribution lines were twice as likely to develop the disease as those who did not. A subsequent study, by other scientists who sought to eliminate what were seen as flaws in the first study, had nearly identical conclusions.

    Laboratory experiments provided more reasons for concern. Electromagnetic radiation, particularly the magnetic part of it, changed some functioning in cells and altered the action of neurotransmitters. Pulses of 60-hertz radiation increased the number of abnormal embryos in chicken eggs.

    The article quoted Dr. David O. Carpenter, then the dean of the School of Public Health at the State University of New York at Albany: “The whole thing is very worrisome. We see the tips of the iceberg, but we have no idea how big the iceberg is. It ought to concern us all.”

    25 YEARS LATER Dr. Carpenter is still at the same university, as the director of the Institute for Health and the Environment. He still finds 60-hertz radiation worrisome.

    “Almost nothing has changed in 25 years in terms of the controversy, although the evidence for biological effects of electromagnetic fields continues to grow stronger,” he wrote via email last week.

    In reviewing the research, the World Health Organization has categorized extremely low-frequency waves as “possibly carcinogenic”: There appears to be an increase in leukemia rates with long-term exposure to magnetic fields stronger than 0.4 microtesla. The earth’s magnetic field is about 100 times stronger, but it is not oscillating, a crucial distinction. (Concerns about other childhood cancers have largely abated.)

    But only a small fraction of people are exposed to extremely low-frequency waves that strong. “It’s not a very normal type of exposure,” said Emilie van Deventer, the leader of a W.H.O. project to assess the health effects of electromagnetic fields.

    One reason for the continuing uncertainty is that scientists have yet to explain how such waves could lead to cancer. Leukemia is a relatively rare disease, striking fewer than one in 5,000 children in the United States; its causes are hard to study, and even if a link were established, any effort to shield the world from low-frequency radiation would at best prevent a small number of cancers.

    Continue reading the main storyContinue reading the main storyContinue reading the main story
    “In terms of a public health perspective and in terms of what one would think of suggesting in terms of regulations, you can see that the risk-benefit ratio would be quite unbalanced,” Dr. van Deventer said. “And this is if we were able to show causality.”

    In recent years, concerns have migrated to frequencies that oscillate not 60 times a second but millions to billions of times — those used by cellphones, cordless phones and wireless networks. Dr. Carpenter, for example, would like to keep Wi-Fi out of schools, even though there is no direct evidence of harm as of yet and it broadcasts at lower energy levels than cellphones; the W.H.O. calls the radio frequencies used by cellphones, Wi-Fi and other telecommunication devices also “possibly carcinogenic.”

    “Which is a little bit difficult to explain to the public,” Dr. van Deventer said. “People like to have a black-and-white answer.

    “Looking at trends over the last 20, 30 years, we don’t see an increase” in cancer, she said. “But again, we don’t know. If it takes cancer 10 years to promote, maybe we will see it in the next 10 years.”

    The possible hazards have not deterred her from a modern lifestyle. “Yes, I am calling you, talking to you using my cellphone,” she said. “I have a microwave. I have everything. It doesn’t change anything for me.”

    She added, ”But from a professional point of view, it’s important that we stay on top of it.”

    The W.H.O. project is working on a new report summarizing the health risks of radio-frequency fields, to be published next year.http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/08/science/debate-continues-on-hazards-of-electromagnetic-waves.html?emc=eta1&_r=0

    • #161 by Joe Imbriano on July 7, 2014 - 11:59 pm

      Cancer is a problem but pales in comparison to the goal, the destruction of the female ovum.]

      Cell phones are not the problem, but rather the wireless devices in the laps of young girls all day at school, all day at home and all night under the pillow. That is what we need to address, more specifically the forced exposure in schools.

      Notice the article soft peddles the issue and refers to “WiFi in schools” as being low power, less than cell phones and yet the iPads and laptops are in use all day unlike cell phones, and they emit more Rf microwave radiation than a cell phone,

      Now add the exposure to 35+ devices in addition to the multiple wireless access points in the classroom. Now add the other 35 devices and access points behind each common wall compounding exposures at school.

      • #162 by Anonymous on July 9, 2014 - 12:01 pm

        Why would the schools allow this if in fact it is really harmful? It makes no sense. I just find all of this very hard to believe.

  93. #164 by Anonymous on July 9, 2014 - 4:12 pm

    RUSSIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON NON-IONIZING RADIATION PROTECTION
    June 19, 2012 Moscow, Russia

    Recommendations Wi-Fi,
    of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection of the necessity to regulate strictly the use of Wi-Fi in kindergartens and schools Mobile cellular communication is getting more popular among children of different ages.
    Children excel adult population in the mobile phone calls use. At the same time, there is a daily brain exposure of EMF RF. In addition, all children are constantly exposed of EMF RF from base stations. The problem of the children’s health maintenance in the development of wireless communications was set up as priority by World Health Organization.
    Electromagnetic radiation from Wi-Fi creates an additional burden for the child brain, whose body is in a state of development and the formation of mental activity. During this period,
    children are most susceptible to adverse environmental factors (WHO, publication number 3, April 2003).
    It is necessary to note that the existing standards have been developed, without consideration of this additional exposure of EMF.

    RussCNIRP consider necessary:
    1. Ministry of Health and other organizations, responsible for the population safety (including children), should pay attention to the regulation of Wi-Fi use in kindergartens and schools; to the strengthening of sanitary control of the Wi-Fi using and to the development of an appropriate regulatory framework.
    2. To recommend the usage of wired networks in schools and educational institutions, rather than a network using wireless broadband systems, including Wi-Fi.

    Chairman of RussCNIRP,

    Professor Yury G. Grigoriev
    Tel./fax: ( 7 499)-190-9660
    E-mail: rcnirp@mail.ru

  94. #165 by Eric on July 9, 2014 - 8:52 pm

    For as long as I have known you, you never backed down when you believed in something. I remember watching you work the rows of tables with the lines of people at times by yourself at those mega churches during that referendum a few years back. In spite of the fact that they didn’t even want you there you still managed to get in there and do the right thing in spite of the incredible resistance.

    Joe, this issue is so much larger and cuts to the heart of us all. Accepting what you allege means major lifestyle changes that nobody is prepared for. No one wants to risk their careers these days, especially in this economy. Yet what you have done is incredibly courageous by risking it all. You know someday people will look back with incredible regret on why they didn’t take a stand and make the sacrifices to protect their own children.

    I wish I could be there to help. Like during the battle for marriage, you will find that the Bible rings true about the depraved proclivity of humanity, especially in so called “Christian” circles. There is always, however, a remnant and I am sure you have already found it. I can only imagine what it is like to be in your shoes. You are a very blessed man with incredible wisdom. Money cannot buy what you possess.

    I know you are right about all of this so please watch your back. May the Lord God bless you. May he keep you and yours in the uncertain and tumultuous days that lie ahead. Lay hold on eternal life and run the race Joe. Run it all the way to the finish line. Take care brother.

  95. #167 by Joe Imbriano on July 10, 2014 - 6:37 am

    I remember watching Jackie Gleason yelling at his wife and threatening to hit her on the ” Honeymooners” while the studio audience was being cued to laugh. Carol O’Connor in “All in the family” would sit in his chair in front of the idiot box, drink a beer, yell and insult his wife, demean minorities, and spew vitriol while the audience was cued up to laugh. Red Fox in “Sanford and son” would demean Puerto Ricans, innocuously laugh at “skin flicks” and flat out insult Christians like Aunt Esther while the audience was cued up to laugh.

    Here we are a generation later and we are being trained to laugh at you and your children being sterilized. Of course this tool only mentions the cajones and not the female eggs.

    https://www.yahoo.com/tech/if-youre-concerned-about-cell-phone-radiation-91281813979.html

    Ladies and gentlemen, looks like the joke is on you and your kids in the wireless classrooms and in your homes with the tablets and laptops which have higher SAR ratings than most cell phones. I am not laughing because this is not funny.

    • #168 by you go Joe on July 10, 2014 - 11:01 pm

      “The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself…Almost inevitably, he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, and intolerable.”—H.L. Mencken, American journalist.

  96. #169 by Robert Gilden on July 10, 2014 - 8:23 am

    It looks like I will no longer be taking my son to the ball game anymore. As it stands, most people are on their phones at the game now. What is the point of even fighting the crowds just to look at a tablet at the stadium. Where will it end? Will they be putting these things in our kids’ underwear eventually?

    “AT&T Park, home of the San Francisco Giants, became the first professional sports venue to provide continuous universal wireless access to fans in all concourses and seating areas. Working in conjunction with AT&T, the Giants installed more than 1,200 Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n) access points.”

    excerpt:
    One of the key challenges to deploying Wi-Fi in stadiums is finding somewhere to mount the antennas close enough to the fans.

    “In stadiums where you don’t have a back wall or ceiling to deploy the Wi-Fi antenna, you need another solution to get the Wi-Fi signal to the digital devices,” said Jeff Lime, vice president of Ventev Wireless Infrastructure.

    Ventev sought to meet this need by developing a smaller antenna and an access point in a package that can be mounted below the stadium seats.

    Ventev’s TerraWave Under-the-Seat Wi-Fi Solution comprises six 2-inch-tall Bantam omnidirectional antennas that are connected to an access point and housed inside a compact, watertight and tamper-proof enclosure, which can be installed onto a concrete or metal surface.

    “The challenge we had to solve was mounting the access point under the seat with an antenna that gives the proper RF coverage in a small space and allows the stadium owners to power wash the stadium, clear the trash under the seats and keep it far enough away from the users that it passes all RF regulations,” Lime said.

    The Wi-Fi solution has been deployed in several large public venues including a Major League Baseball stadium and a high-profile U.S. airport. It is compatible with Cisco 2600/2700/3500/3600/3700 APs.

    Ventev’s TerraWave Under-the-Seat Wi-Fi Solution
    TerraWave Under-the-Seat Wi-Fi Solution with Access Point and 6 TerraWave Bantam Antennas (3)

    http://www.aglmediagroup.com/technology-aids-wi-fi-installs-in-stadiums/

    • #170 by Anonymous on July 12, 2014 - 11:15 pm

      Schools, stadiums, home, work, airplanes, trains, hotels, outside with cell towers, restaurants, National parks. Looks like you just need to lock your kids in the house Joe. They’ll be safe.

  97. #171 by Anonymous on July 10, 2014 - 8:42 pm

    This is absolutely horrifying information.

    • #172 by Homer's odysee on July 13, 2014 - 8:31 pm

      The red haired unicorn chupacabra flies through the night looking for kittens. This stuff is all cockamamie, bullshit fear mongering pseudoscience. None of it has any scientific basis.

      • #173 by Jamie on July 14, 2014 - 8:11 am

        At this point, I trust anecdotal more than scientific evidence.

      • #174 by Joe Imbriano on July 21, 2014 - 7:48 am

        Good advice for you and yours- When you pick up your kids from a long day under the access points crammed 35 to a room with iPads in their laps all day in one of the Fullerton School District’s radiation chambers, make sure once they get home that the xbox stays plugged in, with the controllers in your kids laps next to the WiFi router with the iPad under their pillow with the laptop in their lap next to the cordless phone on the nightstand next to the wireless TV and dvr on the dresser next to the desk with the wireless keyboard and mouse under the sensors to the wireless security system above the table where the iPhone has the infertility doctor’s number on speed dial on top of the special ed enrollment numbers and job listings along with with the American cancer society envelope for tax deductible donations next to Autism Speaks next event listing. I will take my chances with the chupacabras any day over living in your world of denial. At least my lineage is still in the bank.

        Of course, this is simply satire and all of the aforementioned are a very serious potential threat to the well being of our children. I urge all of you to open your eyes and look into your children’s and rescue them from the grip of this agenda.

  98. #175 by nut job on July 21, 2014 - 5:22 pm

    You went off the deep end on this one.

    • #176 by Shane on July 21, 2014 - 5:35 pm

      I would say Joe is spot on and you are the nut job.

  99. #177 by Anonymous on July 23, 2014 - 12:34 pm

    Wifi is incredibly dangerous. It suppresses your thyroid, disrupts seratonin and melanonin, and causes breast cancer tumours to grow five times as fast. Professor Martha Herbert of Harvard Medical School is campaigning against its use in schools, as is ex-Microsoft Canada head Frank Clegg, now running Citizens for Safe Technology. Lloyds stopped insuing telecoms companies against public liability claims in 1999. They stopped insuring the asbestos companies in 1913. They read the scientific press. Switch it off – or cable.

  100. #178 by Wilma on July 24, 2014 - 10:57 am

    I have a question. Zuckerberger wants to roll out free wi-fi in
    schools. His wife is a doctor.They are both brilliant people.Do they not understand the potential health affects on society?Are our kids to be used as canaries in a coal mine?

    • #179 by Joe Imbriano on July 24, 2014 - 7:08 pm

      Wilma, I believe that they are either fully aware of what they are involved in and are very evil, or perhaps they are mind controlled as many at the higher levels are. There are no accidents as even the odds of choosing the 2.4 GHz frequency for WiFi / WLAN which is the exact frequency at which the maximum dielectric loss of water (the essence of life) begins are around 1 in 100,000,000,000,000,000,000.

      THERE ARE NO ACCIDENTS OR COINCIDENCES IN THIS AGENDA, ONLY ENGINEERED COINCIDENCES TO APPEAR AS SUCH TO THE UNINFORMED AND THE UNSUSPECTING.

      The day has come where the most nefarious of agendas and the explosion in proliferation of innocuously appearing weaponized techonlogy are harmoniously converging right in your’s and your children’s laps. It is the wireless agenda,it is all about fertility and it is all about your children being able to have children of their own someday.

  101. #180 by Joe Imbriano on July 24, 2014 - 7:57 pm

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: joe imbriano
    Date: Thu, Jul 24, 2014
    Subject: Re: [cheemf] GSM and Wifi microwave radiation has adverse effects on aromatic plants
    To: Joel MOSKOWITZ

    Dr. Moskowitz, thank you for this information.

    http://1.usa.gov/1nERrst

    One would expect WLAN emissions to be more damaging as the broadcast frequency on which the devices operate are at the exact frequency at which the maximum dielectric loss of water begins. This is extremely biologically significant. The mechanism at work here is very simple. The WLAN emissions result in structural isomerism in the photo receptors of the plants which create a situation in which pyruvate overflow is being induced by the disruption of light and dark transitions. These resultant GLV emission bursts are what is being quantified and observed in the study.

    GSM frequencies are lower than WLAN and, while nonetheless still dangerous, WLAN has the most potential to do the most harm. Sadly, by design, WLAN is being forcibly deployed at point blank range on children’s reproductive organs in schools with iPads and voluntarily in homes by the unsuspecting parents.

    We have an unmitigated public health disaster in the making on our hands and we all have a tremendous responsibility to intervene.

    Joe Imbriano

    site admin

    http://wifidangers.com/
    http://thefullertoninformer.com/

    • #181 by Anonymous on July 24, 2014 - 10:12 pm

      Re: Berkeley pushes for cancer stickers on cell phones

      Dr. Moskowitz understates the evidence that wireless radiation is harmful. That’s right, understates.

      In February 2014, Drs. Pall & Dart presented to the Oregon State House of Representatives Committee on Health explicitly saying wireless radiation causes cancer, male and female infertility, . . . . the list goes on.
      Here is the video:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-nYxZHak6I

      The scientific evidence is there and the studies now number in the thousands. What is also there is the continual trillion-dollar industry denial of the findings. The population is largely ignorant and easily placated by the ever-present spin of doubt and assurances that the science is “inconclusive.”

      History should have taught us something. It took decades before tobacco and asbestos were officially recognized as carcinogens. What would make anyone think that the same scenario is not, once again, playing itself out with wireless radiation? What would make anyone think that industry is not, once again, denying the science until enough dead bodies make the truth self evident?

  102. #182 by Joe Imbriano on July 28, 2014 - 8:12 am

    Looks like they will be examining the best science out there. Looks like the school districts are the corporations running the experiment. I wonder if they will be looking at the reproductive harm of wireless exposure or trace phthalate exposure from seat cushions.

    http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-05/documents/reaffirmation_memorandum.pdf

  103. #183 by verna Smith on August 1, 2014 - 1:22 pm

    I appreciate this article as well as totally agree with the statements for this article.I continue to pray. For truly Satan is at work behind all this technology. Its so very saddening . So many being deceived. Thank you for the research.

  104. #184 by Paulette on August 10, 2014 - 3:14 pm

    This should be of interest for parents as school resumes very soon for children

    http://www.wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/Wi-Fi+papers.pdf

  105. #185 by Anonymous on August 10, 2014 - 5:47 pm

    If this is true then why would the schools do this to all the kids? I don’t understand, I mean WiFi is everywhere. Just look around. Makes no sense.

    • #186 by Joe Imbriano on August 11, 2014 - 6:36 am

      That is the ultimate question.

      There are many possible answers, and I bet the more we think about it, the better we can reply.

      1. It’s inconvenient to hard wire classrooms.

      2. If they acknowledge the thousands of scientific studies that show harmful biological effects, then they have to do something about it.

      3. If that school does something about it, they will then be made fun of by those that refuse to acknowledge the science.

      4. If one school recognizes harmful effects, that school and other schools may then be liable.

      5. Then other schools in the state may have to.

      Other possibilities:

      6. Everyone has to wrestle with the psychological aspects of this issue. It’s not easy to think about what this means if it is true, because the ramifications are massive. The more invested someone is, the harder it is to make the change, probably because they don’t want to admit their responsibility.

      It’s hard enough to think that we may have hurt our own children, imagine feeling responsible for an entire school district.

      I believe that the school officials and their worshipers have all gone so far down the wrong road that their pride is keeping them from turning back.

      May I remind all involved that it is never too late to do the right thing.

  106. #187 by Judith Kaluzny on August 11, 2014 - 10:52 am

    TMI

    • #188 by penchant for change on August 11, 2014 - 9:17 pm

      Ipads, cell phones, wireless gaming systems, cell towers and laptops emit the same form of radiation at very similar power levels. They are purposely being deployed on our children with nefarious intent. The floodgates are now opening on an industry that is clearly in league with the devil.

      Twenty-nine high-profile lawsuits brought by people whose brain tumors were caused by their cell phones are finally moving toward trial. Six of these cases were originally filed in 2001 and 2002. Many of the plaintiffs are no longer alive.
      On Friday, Judge Frederick H. Weisberg, in the D.C. Superior Court, admitted the testimony of five expert witnesses for the plaintiffs, and the 12- and 13-year-old cases will now move into the discovery phase.

      Each of the plaintiffs is asking for more than $100,000,000. There are 46 defendants including Motorola, Nokia, AT&T, Bell Atlantic, Cellular One, Cingular Wireless, SBC Communications, Verizon, Vodafone, the Telecommunications Industry Association, the IEEE, ANSI, the CTIA, and
      the FCC. The plaintiffs are represented by Jeffrey B. Morganroth of Morganroth & Morganroth, a law firm in Birmingham, Michigan.

      For over a decade the industry and the plaintiffs have played tug-of-war with the oldest cases, sending them back and forth between federal and state courts, and fighting over whether the plaintiff’s claims were preempted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

      In 2009 the D.C. Court of Appeals, in Murray v. Motorola (982 A. 2d 764), ruled that the telecommunications companies could not be sued over brain tumors caused by cell phones manufactured after 1996. But since all of these plaintiffs had used pre-1996 phones, their lawsuits were allowed to go forward. They were also allowed to go forward on their
      claims that the defendants made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose information about the dangers of cell phones. These claims were brought under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act.

      In December 2013 and January 2014, testimony was heard from:

      DR. SHIRA KRAMER, a Maryland epidemiologist;

      DR. MICHAEL KUNDI, professor of epidemiology and occupational health at
      the Medical University of Vienna;

      DR. VINI KHURANA, a neurosurgeon and professor of neurosurgery at the
      Australian National University in Canberra;

      DR. IGOR BELYAEV, head research scientist at the Cancer Research
      institute at the Slovak Academy of Science in Bratislava, Slovakia;

      DR. WILHELM MOSGOELLER, professor and medical doctor at the University
      of Vienna Medical School’s Institute for Cancer Research;

      DR. DIMITRIS PANAGAPOULOUS, founder of the Radiation Biophysics
      Laboratory at the University of Athens;

      DR. ABRAHAM LIBOFF, professor emeritus of physics at Oakland University
      in Rochester, Michigan; and

      DR. LAURA PLUNKETT, pharmacologist and toxicologist in Houston.

      On Friday, August 8, 2014, the testimony of Drs. Kramer, Khurana, and
      Panagopoulos was disallowed. But the testimony of Drs. Kundi, Belyaev,
      Mosgoeller, Liboff, and Plunkett was admitted. They will testify at
      trial about “general causation,” i.e. that cell phones can cause brain tumors. The lawsuits now move into the discovery phase, in which each side is compelled to produce documents and answer questions. This is the first time that the industry has had to turn over data. There will then be a fight over the admission of the testimony of witnesses on “specific causation,” i.e. doctors and others who will testify that these specific cell phones caused these specific tumors.

      Friday’s decision by Judge Weisberg allowed 13 of the cases, which have been consolidated in one action, to go forward. The other 16 cases are being tried separately, but the parties in those cases agreed to be bound by Friday’s decision.

      In allowing the experts to testify, Judge Weisberg wrote:

      “Federal law is the supreme law of the land, but there is no
      constitutional provision that says federal facts are the supreme facts of the land. Federal law can preempt state law, but it cannot preempt scientific fact. The scientific truth, whatever it may be, lies outside of the FCC’s regulations about what is “safe” or “unsafe.”

      Maybe this is why government officials have been preparing for massive civil unrest here in The US. These lawsuits could be the catalysts that will bring down this house of cards that the experts mistakenly refer to as a robust and healthy economy. Keep your eyes on these suits as they wind their way through the system.

  107. #189 by Joe Imbriano on August 17, 2014 - 11:17 pm

    http://www.projectinkwell.org/manifesto.php

    First on the list:

    1) Provide adequate bandwidth and Internet access to all schools, calculated on a per – student basis. The last, in-class distribution of this bandwidth must be WIRELESS.

  108. #190 by Joe Imbriano on August 18, 2014 - 12:51 am

    You can call all this a conspiracy theory all you want. Your denial isn’t going to bring back your daughters’ eggs.

    In the meantime, back home on the ranch, your good buddy Bill Gates with his pals over at MIT are working on wireless activated birth control. They would never put nano tech compounds that are activated by wireless emissions in the vaccines now would they. You know the 40 shots you gave each of your children so they could get into Robert Pletka’s 21st century learning classrooms which are really just forced wireless radiation exposure soon to be video game chambers. Gates is into vaccines big time. He is into birth control big time. He is into Common Core big time. He is into wireless for school children big time. Now so are you and your children. And this is the technology that they are telling you about, a classic red herring. What they will never talk about is what I just previously mentioned. I believe it is already being done.

    LEXINGTON, MA – The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the development of a contraceptive microchip that can be remotely controlled to release hormones that can act as abortifacients into a woman’s body for up to 16 years. Both the chip’s potential to take a life and the potential privacy concerns have drawn criticism.

    The chip, which measures 20 x 20 x 7 millimeters, can be implanted under the skin of a woman’s buttocks, upper arm, or abdomen in 30 minutes. The device contains a 16-year reservoir of the drug levonorgestrel, releasing 30 micrograms a day – but the dosage can be altered by remote control, as well.

    The technology was originally intended, and tested, to release osteoporosis medication in elderly women, but Dr. Robert Langer of MIT changed his focus to contraception after a personal discussion with Bill Gates. Gavin Corley, a biomedical engineer, told the BBC the technology could be used to achieve contraceptive targets in the developing world, indicating “a humanitarian application as opposed to satisfying a first-world need.”

    The announcement comes as the Gates Foundation is spearheading an international, multi-billion-dollar push for expanding birth control in the developing world, bringing charges from pro-life and political that they are engaged in global population control. In June, Melinda Gates wrote that the foundation “has decided not to fund abortion” as part of its efforts.

    But numerous studies have indicated that levonorgestrel, the hormone used both by this chip and the morning after pill, has a strong anti-implantation effect, meaning it acts in part by preventing a newly-conceived embryo from implanting in the uterus. One study found the hormone only has an “effectiveness rate” of 49 percent when blocking ovulation alone.

    “Administration of dangerous hormonal contraceptive drugs, whether through new technologies or traditional oral methods, should not be considered a boon for women’s health, as the serious risks of these drugs are better known every day,” Fr. Shenan Boquet, president of Human Life International, told LifeSiteNews.com.

    “Our concerns are only heightened when we see reporters promoting this effort of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation without mention of the harm done to women by other versions of these drugs, as if this only promises good health and empowerment for women,” he added.

    This isn’t reporting; it’s propaganda, and it is especially dangerous given the risks involved.”

    Then again, a remote-controlled computer chip that potentially leaves the patient’s health at the mercy of anyone with sufficient computer skills presents its own issues.

    Dr. Robert Farra of MIT said the subcutaneous computer chip must be given “secure encryption” so that “someone across the room cannot re-program your implant.” To date, that security has not been developed.

    Civil libertarians worry about how hackers – and rogue government agencies – could exploit that technology. “Whatever that chip transmits will go into a government file,” John Whitehead, a constitutional attorney and founder of The Rutherford Institute, told LifeSiteNews. “The chip may actually know when you’re having sex. So, there will be no privacy, no.”

    One source of privacy violation is hackers. In April, Wired magazine reported on a two-year effort led by Scott Erven that successfully hacked hospitals’ drug-infusion pumps, allowing them to alter the amount of morphine administered to patients; accessed defibrilators, creating unnecessary shocks or preventing life-saving shocks to restart a patient’s heart; refrigeration units that house blood, changing the temperature and potentially allowing the blood supply to spoil; viewed X-rays; and had the ability to change patients’ online medical records.

    Another is government. Whitehead extensively researched the extent of government surveillance for his new book, A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State.

    “Here’s what I’ve learned about government – whatever technology we have, theirs is much greater,” he said, noting the potential for abuse leads to inherent privacy issues and violations of the Fourth Amendment. “The FBI is collecting a huge DNA database now,” he told LifeSiteNews. The Supreme Court upheld widespread DNA collection in its 2013 Maryland v. King decision.

    “I’m afraid the chip could be activated in some harmful way,” such as a future eugenics program, Whitehead said. “It could basically bar certain people from having children.”

    Click “like” if you are PRO-LIFE!

    Instead of protecting citizens’ liberties, “Congress has given us no guidelines” about invasive forms of technology, he said. He believes that is because Congress is “funded by the same groups that are providing the technology.”

    Pre-clinical testing of the new microchip begins next year. Langer’s development team at MicroCHIPS Inc., based in Lexington, Massachusetts, hopes to introduce the product by 2018, pending approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

    “People can voluntarily do it,” Whitehead said, “but they need to know what the dangers are.”

    “The Gates Foundation and its partners are likely to continue this assault on women’s health until a sustained world-wide backlash ensues,” Fr. Boquet said.

  109. #191 by Vaccine Truth--Straight from Germany on August 22, 2014 - 9:11 am

    “Dear all,

    I am treating autistic children from all over Europe. I haven had a single case in which the parents didn t report that the onset was triggered by a vaccine. This doesn t exclude that many other factors from genetic predispositions (Most research unfortunately focusses on this as the main aetilogy) , synergistic toxins and other triggering factors can be the reason for the onset. We have an incidence here in Europe of one in 10000 children affected by ASD whilst the official number for boys in the US now is one in 52. The safety limit for Aluminium here in Germany was set this year at 8,6 micrograms per day for and adult. If you consider the average vaccine nowadays to contain between 250 and 500 microgramms of Aluminium for a non life vaccine the synergistic effect with the smallest amounts of Hg from background contamination (Mothers teeth, light bulbs, air, etc.) is very strong. One thing we always find in the affected children is an extremely low detoxification capacity. Reduced glutathion is always present. All chelation attempts therefore are very slow and difficult to achieve and require an intense monitoring.This year a good analysis of the previously mentioned authors together with Prof Boyd Haley was published to have a closer look at the 6 studies usually forming the arguments against a n ASD thimerosol link. It is worth reading:

    Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in
    Research Purporting to Show Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe
    Brian Hooker,1 Janet Kern,2,3 David Geier,2 Boyd Haley,4 Lisa Sykes,5
    Paul King,5 andMark Geier2
    1 Simpson University, 2211 College View Drive, Redding, CA 96001, USA
    2 Institute of Chronic Illness, Inc., 14 Redgate Court, Silver Spring, MD 20905, USA
    3University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
    4University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
    5CoMeD, Inc., Silver Spring,MD, USA
    Correspondence should be addressed to Brian Hooker; bhooker@simpsonu.edu
    Received 15 February 2014; Accepted 12 May 2014; Published 4 June 2014
    There are over 165 studies that have focused on Thimerosal, an organic-mercury (Hg) based compound, used as a preservative in
    many childhood vaccines, and found it to be harmful. Of these, 16 were conducted to specifically examine the effects of Thimerosal
    on human infants or children with reported outcomes of death; acrodynia; poisoning; allergic reaction; malformations; autoimmune
    reaction;Well’s syndrome; developmental delay; and neurodevelopmental disorders, including tics, speech delay, language
    delay, attention deficit disorder, and autism. In contrast, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that
    Thimerosal is safe and there is “no relationship between [T]himerosal[-]containing vaccines and autism rates in children.” This
    is puzzling because, in a study conducted directly by CDC epidemiologists, a 7.6-fold increased risk of autism from exposure to
    Thimerosal during infancy was found.The CDC’s current stance that Thimerosal is safe and that there is no relationship between
    Thimerosal and autism is based on six specific published epidemiological studies coauthored and sponsored by the CDC. The
    purpose of this review is to examine these six publications and analyze possible reasons why their published outcomes are so
    different from the results of investigations by multiple independent research groups over the past 75+ years.

    In Paris we just initiated an expert hearing on the subject of Aluminium alone and we hope to reach a moratorium for the HPV vaccine at the moment because of a growing number of severe side effects. Most metals don t belong into the body and have a toxicological, immunological and synergistic effect with the other ones.

    Together with the other backgound pollution we will soon be faced with a new epidemic of immunological and neurological diseases.
    Review
    Expert Panel Workshop Consensus Statement on the Role of the
    Environment in the Development of Autoimmune Disease
    Christine G. Parks 1,*, Frederick W. Miller 2, Kenneth Michael Pollard 3, Carlo Selmi 4,5,
    Dori Germolec 6, Kelly Joyce 7, Noel R. Rose 8 and Michael C. Humble 9
    1 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS),
    National Institutes of Health (NIH), Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
    2 Environmental Autoimmunity Group, NIEHS, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
    E-Mail: millerf@mail.nih.gov
    3 Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla,
    CA 92037, USA; E-Mail: mpollard@scripps.edu
    4 Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of California,
    Davis, CA 95616, USA; E-Mail: carlo.selmi@unimi.it
    5 Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center,
    Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy
    6 National Toxicology Program, NIEHS, NIH, Morrisville, NC 27560, USA;
    E-Mail: germolec@niehs.nih.gov
    7 Department of History and Politics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
    E-Mail: kaj68@drexel.edu
    8 John Hopkins Center for Autoimmune Disease Research, Bloomberg School of Public Health,
    Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; E-Mail: nrose2@jhu.edu
    9 Division of Extramural Research and Training, NIEHS, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
    USA; E-Mail: humble@niehs.nih.gov
    * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: parks1@niehs.nih.gov;
    Tel.: +10-919-541-2577.
    Received: 9 June 2014; in revised form: 31 July 2014 / Accepted: 4 August 2014 /
    Published: 15 August 2014
    Abstract: Autoimmune diseases include 80 or more complex disorders characterized by
    self-reactive, pathologic immune responses in which genetic susceptibility is largely
    insufficient to determine disease onset. In September 2010, the National Institute of
    Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) organized an expert panel workshop to evaluate
    the role of environmental factors in autoimmune diseases, and the state of the science
    OPEN ACCESS
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15 14270
    regarding relevant mechanisms, animal models, and human studies. The objective of the
    workshop was to analyze the existing data to identify conclusions that could be drawn
    regarding environmental exposures and autoimmunity and to identify critical knowledge
    gaps and areas of uncertainty for future study. This consensus document summarizes key
    findings from published workshop monographs on areas in which “confident” and “likely”
    assessments were made, with recommendations for further research. Transcribed notes and
    slides were reviewed to synthesize an overview on exposure assessment and questions
    addressed by interdisciplinary panels. Critical advances in the field of autoimmune
    disease research have been made in the past decade. Collaborative translational and
    interdisciplinary research is needed to elucidate the role of environmental factors in
    autoimmune diseases. A focus on exposure assessment methodology is needed to improve
    the effectiveness of human studies, and more experimental studies are needed to focus on
    causal mechanisms underlying observed associations of environmental factors with
    autoimmune disease in humans.

    I hope we will be critical and independant enough to evaluate the situation before increasing the total load of risk factors.

    Best wishes,

    Christof”

    Christof Plothe
    D.O., BSc, OST, HONS, MRO, DPO, HP
    Praxis für Osteopathie
    Bleichstraße 21
    55232 Alzey
    Deutschland
    Tel.: +49 (0)6731 496925
    Fax: +49 (0)6731 496926

    E-Mail: plothe@ostmed.net

    “Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise lösen, durch die sie entstanden sind.”
    A. Einstein
    “We can´t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them”
    A. Einstein

  110. #192 by Anonymous on August 22, 2014 - 10:49 am

    http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/cell_phones._FAQ.html

    The CDC retracted its press release on cell phone radiation. Oddly enough, they continue to fail to mention anything about fertility. It is mind boggling how that very issue is not on the table. I am with you on the schools as being no place for children anymore.

    I have watched you speak at council meetings for several years now. What you discuss is never popular but you tell it like it is. My son has told me about the droves of cars with your fliers on them around town. My daughter complains about your people holding banners in front of her school. I would say that it is some pretty impressive grass roots activism. Good job on the High Schools.

    Joe you have really opened a lot of peoples’ eyes but in doing so, as you are aware, you have purterbed a great deal of very powerful people. Yet in spite of it all, remarkably, you remain steadfast in your mission.

    Without a doubt, you are one of the most brilliant and courageous people that I have ever known. Your children have no idea what kind of parents that they have. I believe your wife is deserving of much credit by standing alongside and behind you all the way as well.

    I wish my son and daughters could muster the courage to open their eyes to what they are allowing to be done to their very own children. They are in denial like so many others while their children become more and more addicted to all of this technology.

    You have done a tremendous job. Keep up the good work. It is truly encouraging to witness your wit and tenacity at work against such odds. Hopefully you are gaining some ground for the sake of us all. You and your family will be in our prayers.

  111. #193 by Amy on August 22, 2014 - 1:16 pm

    The Gates’s of hell has arrived and now is showing up in the classrooms….. Thanks for all your articles exposing the real truth behind this microwave agenda that has been forced into every school… Why they refuse to go fiberoptic or hardwired raises a major red flag….. Time for parents to face the reality of this horrible experiment .. Thank you…

  112. #194 by Protect Your Daughters on October 31, 2014 - 11:11 pm

    Barrie Trower

    Protect your daughters
    “I want to talk at length about one particular problem which I believe is very, very important,” said Trower, asking the audience to imagine themselves as young girls sitting at their school desks being irradiated by wi-fi, laptops and electronic tablet textbooks. “The problem with children and I think it is the most important question or topic now to deal with
    9 See example of humans acting as antennae: Cohn G, Morris D, Patel S, Tan D, Your Noise is My Command: Sensing Gestures Using the Body as an Antennae, http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/ redmon d/groups/cue/publications/chi20 ll_rfgestures _cohn. pdf:
    
    microwaves,” he explained “With all of the research papers, the first thing that springs to mind (and I’ve already read them) is birth defects and we’re looking, not just in humans, but right across the mammalian species, right across the planet. To explain this I need to keep it simple for myself. I would like you to imagine, please, that you are all five years old and you are all girls and you’re sitting in a classroom and a wi-fi is plonked in front of you …
    “The wi-fi is transmitting as is the router on the wall. Now the wi-fi is transmitting generally through your ovaries and you have around 400,000 ovarian follicles – not fully developed – sitting there. They are being irradiated. Let’s move the clock forward to the point where you are now 18. You have been through many years of having your ovaries irradiated. And let’s say now you are 18 and you are pregnant and I have taught many pregnant students. In the first 100 days of your embryo the embryo is developing its own ovarian follicles. By 100 days, as you will probably know, they are virtually formed. ” said Trower.
    The ovarian follicles of the 18-year-old have been damaged and this damage is passed down to her daughter and her daughter. In short, the stage is being set for a catastrophe unseen before in human history.
    “They have no defense mechanism at all against microwaves,” said Trower. “There is no Protein 53 which are four protein structures. There is no nuclear core complex. Those are defense structures we have developed through evolution to protect us against electric storms when we were living in caves. They have nothing. So the ovarian follicles of the embryo and the mother may not even know she’s pregnant at this stage – the ovarian follicles have no defense mechanism – and what we are looking at is when your child is born, which may or may not have genetic damage, it is that child’s birth where the real problem is going to come out. And we are already seeing this with other mammalian species and if you’re wondering how many people are going to be involved – there is only one paper I know of in the world written by a professor, oddly enough, by an advisor with the W.H.O. and he found when women were being deliberately microwaved the rate of stillbirth, miscarriage, genetically damaged children was 57.7 percent and this was at a level of radiation lower than a child would get in a classroom with 20 wi-fis (desktop units). We know a minimum of 57 percent. Now that’s the good news.”
    The mitochondrial cells are where the cell takes in nutrients, breaks it down to create energy at the cellular level. Thus, if the mitochondrial cells are damaged, the cell can not function properly. Logically, when this occurs in the cells of ovarian follicles, eggs will not be healthy or even produced. At a personal level, infertility is unfortunate. At a social level, where a country needs healthy workers to prosper, damaged embryos can lead to widespread social problems. On a global scale, the consequences can be catastrophic. Trower is an academic who shies away from politics. He deals in theory.
    Trower’s assertions are, however, supported by sound science from researchers such as Prof. Olle Johansson at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm who posits that after five generations, laboratory animals became infertile. As for DNA damage, Dr. Dimitris Panagopoulos at the University of Athens proved DNA damage to annoying creatures such as fruit flies. In a recent paper, Panagopoulos reported:
    … external EMFs of varying/alternating nature, modulated and pulsed fields such as those associated with modern wireless telecommunications or produced by power lines, would not be expected to have beneficial action. Rather as demonstrated in the present chapter, these can be expected to be detrimental even at intensities thousands
    or even millions of times smaller than those of the current exposure limits. Ways of direct and indirect electromagnetic interaction between environmental fields and living systems are described in the present chapter.
    “The bad news, as most of you will know,” said Trower, “is that the mitochondrial DNA is irreparable. So what we’re saying to your children is if we damage your mitochondrial DNA it is their children and their children and their children. As long as there is a female line you will have this genetic damage. So, by putting wi-fi in school classrooms, what you’re actually doing is sentencing 57 percent of your children to some form of birth defect forever. This is where the joke stops. It isn’t a decision we have the right to make.”

    Source: http://wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/trower_2013.pdf

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!