Here is a video from http://www.wifiinschools.com/ which, in my opinion, is the finest and most comprehensive site in the entire nation in terms of irrefutable evidence that clearly demonstrates we are harming our children with this technology.
You be the judge. WiFi in schools, with their industrial strength routers in some cases just several feet from young children, that are hundreds of times more powerful than the ones in your home or cafe, wireless computers, and tablets in the hands of children emit microwave radiation in close proximity to the developing young bodies of our children, specifically the brain and the highly vulnerable reproductive areas. http://www.wifiinschools.com/studiesreports.html
I believe that children in wireless classrooms are just like the rats in the cage in the following experiment:http://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/1020KJU/kju-48-1308.pdf
There are no FCC RF exposure guidelines for children, only for adults and that is what the schools are standing on. Also the FCC guidelines ARE DECADES OLD and only take into consideration acute burning from microwave exposure.http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/8027123_orig.jpg The FCC guidelines COMPLETELY IGNORE NON THERMAL BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS AS WELL. An important distinction to note is that guidelines are not safety standards. The FCC is not a health care agency. The FCC guidelines, in my opinion, are woefully inadequate and antiquated. They astonishingly allow for exposure limits in a classroom high enough to be 1000 times the emissions of a cell tower. Is the convenience really worth the risk? Let us begin with the basics and welcome aboard.
Look at all of the experts who agree with our position: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
Ladies and gentlemen, what your children are facing is a potential public health disaster in the making. Make your voice heard. They are your children. Please take the time to watch the rest of these videos and get informed: http://www.wifiinschools.com/educational-videos.html
Did you as a parent consent to this? Do you know if this is what your children arleady are or soon to be subjected to? Just say no!
http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/WiFi-NonConsent-Form-for-Use-in-Schools,72,44
#1 by R. Shulze on July 13, 2013 - 8:30 pm
Ok. So I’ gonna assume you do not accept IARC systematic review as an authority and as you provided no alternate systematic review that we may start our discussion with, that you have none. I’m willing to have this debate like educated adults but if we don’t agree to the rules of the game, I can’t play. I’m waisting my time as I have no chance of addressing your misconceptions or even presenting my point. Geez, I just hope that you never need one of those “flesh mechanics” to save your life. Maybe “healthcare technician” would be more politically correct.
#2 by Joe Imbriano on July 13, 2013 - 11:00 pm
Allopathic doctors for the most part R., cause way more problems than they solve. Osteopaths are not mucn better these days either. Way too much prophylactic administration of petrochemical poisons for any of our own good.
R. anything to do with the trillion dollar cancer industry in my opinion is a sick joke. Cancer fundamentally, is a chronic metabolic disorder. It is a nitriloside defiency engineered by the big food giants removing the nitriloside containing foods from modern man’s diet.
The triggers are more prevalent than ever these days with people literally slathering poison all over their skin, irradiating themselves, drinking gallons of chemical concoctions a day, eating foods that aren’t really foods at all, and all the while, consciously and willingly on a daily basis in a Pavlovian fashion. With the defenses down, it’s no wonder the epidemic is exploding.
My concern with the EMF, aside from cancer and cognitive issues is the fertility aspect.
Yes R., for the most part, they are flesh mechanics. The manual that they use was written by the drug companies. Every illness is treated as a medication deficiency. It is pure flypaper I tell you. Once you get on with a couple of appendages you are done for.
Common sense is what we need. Some of the stupidest people I have ever met were the most educated. We have really lost our bearing as a people. We will get it back as long as there are those that can offer a perspective that makes sense.
I remember reading the insert for humalog and the pamphlet that came home with it for a friend of mine. As you know, diabetics have limited pancreatic function. So what do the doctors and insulin makers tell the patient to eat? Peanut butter, beans, bacon, sugar free processed foods and diet sodas, canned tuna, steak, and avoid the high glycemic index foods like oranges and carrots. Instead of advising the patient of the benefits of a raw diet replete with enzymes, dirt cheap mucopolysaccharides present in cactus and the like, they send her home with a syringe, pig insulin, and on her way to the store for some bacon and diet coke-that is insanity. Great business model but not a very moral one.
For me a busted bone, car wreck and I am there. The rest of the petrochemical poisons they push with their bad advice, no thanks.
R., cancer is undoubtedly a problem with EMF exposure, but fertility is the bigger picture issue as it is a right that people don’t know that they are relinquishing.
#3 by Anonymous on July 14, 2013 - 10:26 am
R. Shulze, your responses get vaguer by the day.
You know that IARC has no systematic review on classroom WiFi and WiFi enabled device exposure studies because it is still in clinical trails, the labs are just now being set up and the subjects won’t show up until September.
#4 by dawn on July 14, 2013 - 2:14 pm
OK, we get it. Rather than wire the technology, you want our children to be irradiated.