Here is a video from http://www.wifiinschools.com/ which, in my opinion, is the finest and most comprehensive site in the entire nation in terms of irrefutable evidence that clearly demonstrates we are harming our children with this technology.
You be the judge. WiFi in schools, with their industrial strength routers in some cases just several feet from young children, that are hundreds of times more powerful than the ones in your home or cafe, wireless computers, and tablets in the hands of children emit microwave radiation in close proximity to the developing young bodies of our children, specifically the brain and the highly vulnerable reproductive areas. http://www.wifiinschools.com/studiesreports.html
I believe that children in wireless classrooms are just like the rats in the cage in the following experiment:http://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/1020KJU/kju-48-1308.pdf
There are no FCC RF exposure guidelines for children, only for adults and that is what the schools are standing on. Also the FCC guidelines ARE DECADES OLD and only take into consideration acute burning from microwave exposure.http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/8027123_orig.jpg The FCC guidelines COMPLETELY IGNORE NON THERMAL BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS AS WELL. An important distinction to note is that guidelines are not safety standards. The FCC is not a health care agency. The FCC guidelines, in my opinion, are woefully inadequate and antiquated. They astonishingly allow for exposure limits in a classroom high enough to be 1000 times the emissions of a cell tower. Is the convenience really worth the risk? Let us begin with the basics and welcome aboard.
Look at all of the experts who agree with our position: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
Ladies and gentlemen, what your children are facing is a potential public health disaster in the making. Make your voice heard. They are your children. Please take the time to watch the rest of these videos and get informed: http://www.wifiinschools.com/educational-videos.html
Did you as a parent consent to this? Do you know if this is what your children arleady are or soon to be subjected to? Just say no!
http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/WiFi-NonConsent-Form-for-Use-in-Schools,72,44
#1 by Ray on July 13, 2013 - 8:03 pm
R . Shulze,
Your latest diversion states that a meta-analysis is valid, whereas thousands of peer reviewed studies are not. Where do you come up with these senseless diversions? What is motivating such foolish conduct? What is your conflict of interest here Shulze, because its obvious that you have one.
As parents, if we found that there was a chemical being inserted into the school’s drinking water that thousands of peer reviewed studies reported to cause biological and health effects, few would ignore the information.
If we found that scientific and medical experts have formally declared these chemicals dangerous and advised against their use in schools, few would ignore the information and instead waive around industry propaganda.
Parents wouldn’t wait for the perfect meta-analysis meanwhile ignoring study after study and report after report. They wouldn’t make jokes about pixie dust, candybars, or the old man who died of natural causes.
Only the foolish or the corrupt would respond in such a way.
For these individuals, it wouldn’t matter how much evidence existed, for they would continue to pretend that it wasn’t quite right.
Here’s another piece of evidence for those who are openly investigating this issue:
In 2004 Swisscom, Swizerland’s leading telecom provider, applied for a patent for a lower emission wireless technology. Here are a few excerpts from their application:
“The influence of Electrosmog on the human body is a known problem… When for example, human blood cells are irradiated with electromagnetic fields, clear damage to hereditary material has been demonstrated and there have been indications of an increased cancer risk”
“Thus is has been possible to show that mobile phone radiation can cause damage to genetic material, in particular human white blood cells, whereby both the DNA itself is damaged and the number of chromosomes changed. This mutation can lead to increased cancer risk. In particular, it could also be shown that this destruction is not dependent upon temperature increases, i.e., it is not thermal.”
#2 by dawn on July 14, 2013 - 6:10 am
“For these individuals, it wouldn’t matter how much evidence existed, for they would continue to pretend that it wasn’t quite right.”
Agreed, I have to wonder about R. Shulze’s interest on this blog.
#3 by curious on July 14, 2013 - 12:21 pm
I for one am curious as to why they will not address this issue publicly. I have read the F.S.D. press release and the Rf report and both Dr. Pletka and the firm the district hired clearly fail to address the very nature of this blog’s contention, that is the possible adverse health effects that are below the F.C.C. guidelines.
Am I correct in assuming that the standard of safe RF exposure is pegged to the benchmark of exposure present inside a microwave oven?