WIRELESS CLASSROOMS-Are they safe?


Here is a video from http://www.wifiinschools.com/ which, in my opinion, is the finest and most comprehensive site in the entire nation in terms of irrefutable evidence that clearly demonstrates we are harming our children with this technology.

You be the judge. WiFi in schools, with their industrial strength routers in some cases just several feet from young children, that are hundreds of times more powerful than the ones in your home or cafe, wireless computers, and tablets in the hands of children emit microwave radiation in close proximity to the developing young bodies of our children, specifically the brain and the highly vulnerable reproductive areas.  http://www.wifiinschools.com/studiesreports.html

I believe that children in wireless classrooms are just like the rats in the cage in the following experiment:http://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/1020KJU/kju-48-1308.pdf

There are no FCC RF exposure guidelines for children, only for adults and that is what the schools are standing on. Also the FCC guidelines ARE DECADES OLD and only take into consideration acute burning from microwave exposure.http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/8027123_orig.jpg  The FCC guidelines COMPLETELY IGNORE NON THERMAL BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS AS WELL. An important distinction to note is that guidelines are not safety standards. The FCC is not a health care agency. The FCC guidelines, in my opinion, are woefully inadequate and antiquated. They astonishingly allow for exposure limits in a classroom  high enough to be 1000 times the emissions of a cell tower.  Is the convenience really worth the risk? Let us begin with the basics and welcome aboard.

Look at all of the experts who agree with our position: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html

Ladies and gentlemen, what your children are facing is a potential public health disaster in the making. Make your voice heard. They are your children. Please take the time to watch the rest of these videos and get informed: http://www.wifiinschools.com/educational-videos.html

Did you as a parent consent to this? Do you know if this is what your children arleady are or  soon to be subjected to? Just say no!

http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/WiFi-NonConsent-Form-for-Use-in-Schools,72,44

 

 

 

  1. #1 by R. Shulze on July 13, 2013 - 10:09 am

    Err.

    I would in general agree with you that we should minimize all harmful exposures to everybody, not just children. And of course the FSD can not refute it. It is not logically possible to prove a negative (EMF does no harm, Odin does not exist, etc..) therefore the burden of proof is on those making the positive assertion. Even if there is some evidence of it being harmful there is a certain burden of proof that needs to be met by he preponderance of the evidence. And the burden may very form effect to effect. For instance I would require less proof to verify that a child close to a WiFi router experiences dizziness, than if a child claims that being close to a router makes them poo Fruity Pebbles. I hope that makes sense.

    • #2 by Joe Imbriano on July 13, 2013 - 2:08 pm

      R. do you have any children in the FSD? Also why is everyone at the local level so opposed to hard wiring computers in the classrooms? This is not very complicated.

      I understand that http://www.thewirelessclassroomagenda.com roll out edict is coming down from the White House, then to the State Dept of Ed, then to the OC Dept of Ed and then finally to The FSD, but this is a no brainer. The Feds don’t run the local school districts, the local board and administrations do. So why are they locking arms with an insidious agenda driven, dangerous, irresponsible and unnecessary technology policy, blatantly ignoring the thousands of peer reviewed studies http://www.wifiinschools.com that state that EMF is harmful, putting out blatantly false assurances of safety, and trying to obfuscate the issue by attempting to make this about Joe Imbriano instead of the massive body of scientific evidence that is contrary to what the FSD is doing? So what if all the other schools are doing it. Is Obama the pied piper? https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/421229_10151686938719238_64289827_n.jpg

      What is so evil about an ethernet cable and a keyboard? What is really going on here?

    • #3 by parent, too on July 13, 2013 - 2:37 pm

      Joe, Do we really want to listen to R Schulze, who is in favor of radiating our children so that they can have wireless technology? I believe he has had his say, he supports wireless radiation in the school.

    • #4 by Joe Imbriano on July 13, 2013 - 6:38 pm

      R. is no dummy and has some good points. The more involved in this debate, the better the outcome.

1 53 54 55 56 57 77
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!