Here is a video from http://www.wifiinschools.com/ which, in my opinion, is the finest and most comprehensive site in the entire nation in terms of irrefutable evidence that clearly demonstrates we are harming our children with this technology.
You be the judge. WiFi in schools, with their industrial strength routers in some cases just several feet from young children, that are hundreds of times more powerful than the ones in your home or cafe, wireless computers, and tablets in the hands of children emit microwave radiation in close proximity to the developing young bodies of our children, specifically the brain and the highly vulnerable reproductive areas. http://www.wifiinschools.com/studiesreports.html
I believe that children in wireless classrooms are just like the rats in the cage in the following experiment:http://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/1020KJU/kju-48-1308.pdf
There are no FCC RF exposure guidelines for children, only for adults and that is what the schools are standing on. Also the FCC guidelines ARE DECADES OLD and only take into consideration acute burning from microwave exposure.http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/8027123_orig.jpg The FCC guidelines COMPLETELY IGNORE NON THERMAL BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS AS WELL. An important distinction to note is that guidelines are not safety standards. The FCC is not a health care agency. The FCC guidelines, in my opinion, are woefully inadequate and antiquated. They astonishingly allow for exposure limits in a classroom high enough to be 1000 times the emissions of a cell tower. Is the convenience really worth the risk? Let us begin with the basics and welcome aboard.
Look at all of the experts who agree with our position: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
Ladies and gentlemen, what your children are facing is a potential public health disaster in the making. Make your voice heard. They are your children. Please take the time to watch the rest of these videos and get informed: http://www.wifiinschools.com/educational-videos.html
Did you as a parent consent to this? Do you know if this is what your children arleady are or soon to be subjected to? Just say no!
http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/WiFi-NonConsent-Form-for-Use-in-Schools,72,44
#1 by R. Shulze on July 12, 2013 - 11:47 pm
Ray:
I’m going to ignore you criticizing me of ignoring the positive studies while you seem willing to ignor the negative ones. I don’t even know where to go with that. And yes, studies do “cancel out” other studies. The word you are actually looking for is “disprove”, or I would also accept “refute”. If study A has a small sample size and multiple methodology errors or a sample bias and study B has a larger sample size and fewer errors… study B wins. In this case study B refuted or disproved study A. Not that study A was useless, it may have kept the investigators from making the the same mistakes and perform a better quality of study, which is frequently the case. The fact that you seem to believe that one study caries as much weight as any other study is, in fact, absurd.
You can list as many web pages or letters from experts as you want, simply stating something over and over again does not make it true. Again, I will accept systematic reviews preferably performed by a panel.
Also, I did not say that unless 4000 children die per day from EMF it’s not worth discussing, read it again. That’s actually probably a low number. Some data suggest that about 25,000 people starve to death every day, “most” of which are children. So over 12,500 per day at least would be a fair estimate. But I digress.
Finally, the invisible man in the sky I was referring too was Horus, not God. Sorry to have mislead.
#2 by amateur night on July 13, 2013 - 12:14 am
Very disingenuous indeed. R. do you have scales? So how many are gettin’ sterilized by the pixie dust in these classrooms?
#3 by parent on July 13, 2013 - 7:39 am
You appear to be an ardent advocate for wireless radiation of children in school and also “bored.”
What kind of person advocates for radiation of school children? Especially, when it concerns other people’s children.
#4 by parent, too on July 13, 2013 - 8:14 am
Yes, as a mother our job is to protect our children. The school district needs to take a precautionary position and use wired technology.
I don’t understand anyone who would push for the radiation of the kids. That’s inhuman.