WIRELESS CLASSROOMS-Are they safe?


Here is a video from http://www.wifiinschools.com/ which, in my opinion, is the finest and most comprehensive site in the entire nation in terms of irrefutable evidence that clearly demonstrates we are harming our children with this technology.

You be the judge. WiFi in schools, with their industrial strength routers in some cases just several feet from young children, that are hundreds of times more powerful than the ones in your home or cafe, wireless computers, and tablets in the hands of children emit microwave radiation in close proximity to the developing young bodies of our children, specifically the brain and the highly vulnerable reproductive areas.  http://www.wifiinschools.com/studiesreports.html

I believe that children in wireless classrooms are just like the rats in the cage in the following experiment:http://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/1020KJU/kju-48-1308.pdf

There are no FCC RF exposure guidelines for children, only for adults and that is what the schools are standing on. Also the FCC guidelines ARE DECADES OLD and only take into consideration acute burning from microwave exposure.http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/8027123_orig.jpg  The FCC guidelines COMPLETELY IGNORE NON THERMAL BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS AS WELL. An important distinction to note is that guidelines are not safety standards. The FCC is not a health care agency. The FCC guidelines, in my opinion, are woefully inadequate and antiquated. They astonishingly allow for exposure limits in a classroom  high enough to be 1000 times the emissions of a cell tower.  Is the convenience really worth the risk? Let us begin with the basics and welcome aboard.

Look at all of the experts who agree with our position: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html

Ladies and gentlemen, what your children are facing is a potential public health disaster in the making. Make your voice heard. They are your children. Please take the time to watch the rest of these videos and get informed: http://www.wifiinschools.com/educational-videos.html

Did you as a parent consent to this? Do you know if this is what your children arleady are or  soon to be subjected to? Just say no!

http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/WiFi-NonConsent-Form-for-Use-in-Schools,72,44

 

 

 

  1. #1 by R. Shulze on July 12, 2013 - 5:24 pm

    Sorry, I got bored but will try one more time. This is not my first rodeo with people who don’t science and it is my experience that it is neer impossible to change someone’s mind so why try? In this case I will try because I hope to avoid wasting more of the district money, my money, in defending against assaults. On that note, please consider reimbursing the district for expenses they have had to incur as a result this campaign. Anyway, to move ahead we need to decide on a paper/systematic review as being authoritative rather than cherry picking studies that support our opinion. I would agree to IARC monograph Vol 102, published in 2013, wich classifies RF-EMF radiation as Group 2B, or “possibly carcinogenic”. ( http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol102/index.php ). It’s 480 pages and reviewing it I actually found that there are studies that showed a decrease in relative risk of Glioma following moderate exposure to EMF ( leaving me wondering why you would possibly exclude these studies from your website… ) If it is not acceptable as authoritative I am willing to consider others but please let’s not go down in “level of evidence”.

    As far as my level of education Ray, if you want me to say that I have postdoctoral training in neurobiology and quantum physics and therefor I’m right and you’re wrong, well I won’t. Individual expert opinion is at the bottom of that “level of evidence” pyramid and I know it won’t convince anyone here, including me. Well, if it would let me know and I can save us some time.

    Yes, I did just say that there are studies that show that EMF may help prevent brain tumors/cancer… And you would have the audacity of sugesting that the School district remove those life saving EMF generators from our classrooms… The nerve. ( that’s satire by the way 😉 )

    • #2 by parent on July 12, 2013 - 5:52 pm

      Please take a look at the numerous letters from experts that have studied and know the subject matter: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html#sthash.ezNs83O0.dpuf

      They are ALL saying WiFi in schools is harmful to our children.

      Aren’t you the same R. Shulze who inferred that unless 4,000 children’s lives were lost per day from wireless radiation, it was a non-issue and not worthy of a “conversation?”
      Oh, and the same one that puts down those who have faith in God?

      Yep, it was comment #55

    • #3 by dawn on July 12, 2013 - 5:59 pm

      Bored, huh? Time to move on to an audience that does science. You’re just too advanced for us and then you don’t have to waste any more of your money “in defending against assaults.”

1 47 48 49 50 51 77
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!