«
»

Will Buena Park High School Principal Jim Coombs do the right thing?


The more students on the free lunch program a school has, the more money the school gets for wireless technology. Buena Park High School students are in harms way. Jim Coombs has sat through three years of our monthly presentations at the FJUHSD Trustee board meetings on the dangers that forced classroom wireless microwave radiation poses to the unsuspecting students and staff. Here is a recent video from April 5th, 2016 where Diane Hickey presented in usual fashion, with facts backed by scientific evidence. Mr. Coombs was in attendance and in general, is one of the few principals that regularly pays attention to the speakers.

 

Buena Park High School and wireless chromebooks
The Fullerton Informer <joeimbriano777@gmail.com> Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:41 PM
To: jcoombs@fjuhsd.org
Cc: “sing4us@aol.com” <sing4us@aol.com>, mbuchi@fjuhsd.org, bkilponen@fjuhsd.org, bhathaway@fjuhsd.org, amontoya@fjuhsd.org, Jennifer Williams <jwilliams@fjuhsd.org>, Scott Scambray <sscambray@fjuhsd.org>, Ron Lebs <rlebs@fjuhsd.org>, david morrison <wirelesseducationaction@yahoo.com>, “Shawn E. Abrell, Esq.” <shawn.e.abrell@gmail.com>,

Good evening Mr. Coombs.

As a follow up to my comments at the board meeting, I wanted to reach out to you specifically. Your school is slated to be the first in the FJUHSD to receive the chrome books that are rumored to arrive any day now.
Mr. Coombs, as the principal, I would respectfully request you to refuse to accept these devices and turn off the WiFi systems at your school for the health and safety of staff and students alike.
We all know and understand how the less fortunate are slated for the most categorical funding for this deployment and that is precisely why these students who have the steepest hill to climb need your protection.
I watched you place your arm repeatedly on the miracle student from your school at last months board meeting and it was evidently clear to all in attendance that you held sincere concern for this child’s well being and future.
It is along those lines that I urge you to draw the line in the sand with the district and say no to this first advance against the students and staff. There are hundreds of scientists and thousands of studies which warn against the very thing that is being foisted on your student body on your watch. Just say no. It is the right thing to do.
Years ago, there were ashtrays in the teachers lounges and asbestos lining everything from brake pads to floor tiles. The massive deployment of wireless microwave radiation emitting devices has been referred to as a massive public health crisis in the making and an unmitigated public health disaster in the making.
Here is a link outlining basic positions and concerns as they relate to what you could possibly be undertaking in a matter of days.
Sincerely,
Mr. Imbriano

This entry was posted on April 8, 2016, 9:59 am and is filed under Are they turning their backs on the children?, Forced irradiation of school children, Microwave Radiation in Classrooms, radiation experiments on school children. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  1. #1 by Anonymous on April 8, 2016 - 5:48 pm

    I’m sure he’ll do the right thing and ignore the kooks like you.

    Reply Quote

    • #2 by Anon on April 9, 2016 - 7:19 am

      The science is what the science is. The teachers and children are getting sick, the lawsuits have started. These are the facts.

      Why do you make the messengers the focus? Don’t you like children? Do you wish them harm?

      Quote

    • #3 by Joe Imbriano on April 9, 2016 - 9:29 am

      Because that is all the deniers have. It is amazing how all the people in this community who hold themselves out to be respectable are turning their backs on the children and making this all about Joe Imbriano. The issue is the children, the science and the scientific experts. The fact is that they are too cowardly too face reality, fight for the cause and too selfish to take the necessary steps to protect the children. So they instead circle the wagons together around those that are harming their children which include themselves thinking they are working together against me. That is the epitome of stupidity. It is amazing what the issue of our time has revealed about the people you all thought you knew.

      Quote

    • #4 by Anonymous on April 9, 2016 - 3:54 pm

      Nah, it’s not about you, other than the fact you’re one of the few misguided morons amplifying this junk science and you should be told you’re wrong.

      Quote

    • #5 by Joe Imbriano on April 9, 2016 - 8:49 pm

      Nice try. Making me the issue changes nothing. The science and the experts agree. The children are in harms way. Decades of research is not junk science. You wish. District staff are in an indefensible position and thus the level on which the school district sycophants like you operate.

      Quote

    • #6 by Anonymous on April 9, 2016 - 9:40 pm

      Wow. Your reading comprehension is nonexistent… which is not surprising at all.

      You are the only one making it about you, which is just evidence of a narcissistic personality. Maybe you should start seeing a therapist to deal with your issues.

      Quote

    • #7 by Joe Imbriano on April 9, 2016 - 10:54 pm

      Deal with the facts and the science, not your diagnosis of the messenger. Nice try. The science and the studies stand on their own. Your spin on things changes nothing about the blatantly obvious despicable behavior of everyone that is turning their backs on the children. Maybe all these scientists need a therapist? http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150511005200/en/International-Scientists-Appeal-U.N.-Protect-Humans-Wildlife

      Quote

    • #8 by Anonymous on April 11, 2016 - 7:52 am

      Joe. Are you incapable of reading? Do you just see words on the page, and narcissistically assume they are attacking you, because everything must be about you, because you are the chosen messenger of god and no one else believes the junk science you’re shouting about?

      The science actually disagrees with you. You are ignored by those in power because they are not complete morons, and they can recognize that what you are saying is bullshit. But no, you are on a crusade for attention under the guise of pretending to care about children’s testicles, so you can’t just let it go. You need to be validated.

      Guess what, that’s not going to happen outside the fake sycophantic posters you create on this website.

      Quote

    • #9 by Joe Imbriano on April 9, 2016 - 11:18 pm

      Robert Pletka, Fullerton superintendent needs to work on his reading comprehension-look what he said in light of what is out there on this issue. Maybe he needs a therapist. Still waiting for a response from Coombs.

      google this “pletka totally safe for the children”

      Quote

    • #10 by You don't care about the kids on April 10, 2016 - 5:37 am

      You are pathetic and couldn’t care less about the kids.

      Quote

    • #11 by Anonymous on April 10, 2016 - 2:02 pm

      You sure are right about Joe.

      Quote

    • #12 by Income from wireless or addicted to it? on April 10, 2016 - 11:38 am

      California Medical Association

      House of Delegates Resolution Wireless Standards Reevaluation 2014 Resolution 107- 14
PASSED

      Date Adopted Dec 7, 2014

      
 
 Resolved 1 That CMA supports efforts to reevaluate microwave safety exposure levels associated with wireless communication devices, including consideration of adverse non-thermal biologic and health effects from non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation used in wireless communications; and be it further

      Resolved 2 That CMA support efforts to implement new safety exposure limits for wireless devices to levels that do not cause human or environmental harm based on scientific research.

      
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF DELEGATES 2014
 Wireless Communications Public Safety Standards Reevaluation
Introduced by Cindy Lee Russell, M.D. AND Ken Yew, M.D. 
 


      Whereas there are over 6 billion active cell phones worldwide and dependence of wireless communication networks is rapidly expanding including cell phones, cell towers, wireless routers for home use, medical devices and utility smart meters; and (1)
 

      Whereas scientists are increasingly identifying EMF from wireless devices as a new form of environmental pollution with a growing body of peer reviewed scientific evidence finding significant adverse health and biologic effects on living organisms with exposure to low levels of non-ionizing microwaves currently approved and used in wireless communication, and
 

      Whereas peer reviewed research has demonstrated adverse biological effects of wireless EMF including single and double stranded DNA breaks, creation of reactive oxygen species, immune dysfunction, cognitive processing effects, stress protein synthesis in the brain, altered brain development, sleep and memory disturbances, ADHD, abnormal behavior, sperm dysfunction, and brain tumors; and (2-55)
 

      Whereas there is a long latency period of years to decades to study and identify adverse health effects such as brain cancer, neurodegenerative damage and autism; and
 
Whereas children’s brains are developmentally immature until adolescence, their skulls are thinner and the brain is considerably more vulnerable to toxin exposure , and (23,24)
 

      Whereas the World Health Organization in 2011 designated wireless communications including cell phones to be a possible carcinogenic, and (63)
 

      Whereas many scientists, researchers, public health officials and agencies conclude that wireless electromagnetic frequency (EMF) standards established by the Federal Communications Commission are outdated as they are based only on heat effects which damage to the organism and not biological effects of non –ionizing EMF microwave radiation which are scientifically demonstrated at levels hundreds of times less than current safety exposure limits and thus current standards are inadequate to protect public health; and (49-51)(57)
 

      Whereas the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2013 has asked for reassessment of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields limits and policies that protect children’s health and well-being throughout their lifetimes and reflect current use patterns (58)
 

      RESOLVED; that the CMA understands that existing public safety limits for microwave EMF devices are outdated and inadequate to protect public health thus endorses efforts of the Federal Communications Commission to reevaluate its safety standards to include consideration of adverse non thermal biologic and health effects from non ionizing electromagnetic radiation used in wireless communications; and be it further
 

      RESOLVED; that the CMA supports efforts to implement microwave safety exposure limits to levels that do not cause human or environmental harm based on scientific research, and be it further
 

      RESOLVED; that the CMA set up a task force to determine adequate precautionary recommendations for the use of cell phones and wireless devices for schools and children
 
 


      References Wireless Communications Public Safety Standards Reevaluation
 

      1) More People Have Cell Phones Than Toilets, U.N. Study Shows. Time. March 25, 2013. http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/03/25/more-people-have-cell-phones-than-toilets-u-n-study-shows/

      2) Acute low-intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells. Lai H, Singh, NP Bioelectomagnetics 1995;16(3):207-10 WEB http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7677797

      3) Behavioral Effects of Microwaves . Neurobehavioral Toxicology: 1980 
Spring;2(1): 49-58 Sern S. WEB http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7442919

      4) Microwave Radiation Absorption: Behavioral Effects. Health Physiology: 1991
Jul;6(1):29-40 D’Andrea JA. WEB http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2061046?ordinalpos=1&itool=PPMCLayout.PPMCAppController.PPMCArticlePage.PPMCPubmedRA&linkpos=2

      5) Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain after Exposure to Microwaves from GSM Mobile Phones. Safford L. Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 111, Number 7, June 2003 WEB http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2003/6039/6039.html http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/press/012903.html

      6) The effects of broad-band electromagnetic field exposure on mice (Mus musculus). Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering. Volume 35, Issue 3, 2000. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a906773614

      7) Electromagnetic Fields and DNA Damage. Phillips J. Pathophysiology 16 (2009) 79-88. http://www.scribd.com/doc/21750937/EMF-Cell-Phone-DNA-Damage

      8) Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Lai H, Singh NP, Int J Radiat Biol 69(4):513-521, 1996. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/14573695_Single-_and_double-strand_DNA_breaks_in_rat_brain_cells_after_acute_exposure_to_radiofrequency_electromagnetic_radiation

      9) DNA Strand Breaks in Rat Brain Cells Exposed to Low level Microwave Radiation. Behari J. http://www.ursi.org/proceedings/procGA08/papers/K02bp2.pdf

      10) Long Term Exposure to Microwave Radiation Provokes Cancer Growth: Evidences from Radars and Mobile Communication Systems. Kyrylenko S . Experimental Oncology. March 2011. http://exp-oncology.com.ua/article/1845/long-term-exposure-to-microwave-radiation-provokes-cancer-growth-evidences-from-radars-and-mobile-communication-systems

      11) ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS: Conference, Hearing Call Up Cell Phone Use. Environ Health Perspect. Nov 2009; 117(11): A486. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801166/

      12) EMF’s and DNA Effects: Potential Mechanism Elucidated-Science Selections. Hood E. Environmental Health Perspectives, May 2004. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1316056/

      13) Association between vestibular schwannomas and mobile phone use. Moon S. Tumour Biol. Jan 2014; 35(1): 581–587. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907669/

      14) Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumors: increased risk associated with use for > or =10 years. Hardell L, Carlsberg M. Occupational Environmental Medicine 2007, Sept; 64(9):626-32 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17409179

      15) Meta-analysis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumors. Hardell L International Journal of Oncology. May 2008 vol 32 Number 5. http://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/article.jsp?article_id=ijo_32_5_1097

      16) Cell phone Use and Acoustic Neuroma: The Need for Standardized Questionaires and access to Industry Data. Surgical Neurology. Volume 72, issue 3, pages 216-222 (Sept 2009) Yueh-Ying Han. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24241041_Cell_phone_use_and_acoustic_neuroma_the_need_for_standardized_questionnaires_and_access_to_industry_data

      17) Exposure to Wireless Phone Emissions and Serum Bets-Trace Proteins. Hardell L. Soderqvist F. International Journal Molecular Medicine. 2010 August; 26(2):301-306. http://www.biomedsearch.com/nih/Exposure-to-wireless-phone-emissions/20596612.html

      18) Mobile Phone Use and the Risk for Malignant Brain Tumors: A Case Control Study on Deceased Cases and Controls . Hardell L, Carlsberg M, Neuroepidemiology: 2010 June 15;35(2): 109-114. http://www.avaate.org/IMG/pdf/Hardell_et_al_Neuroepidemiology_2010.pdf

      19) Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use. Hardell L . Int J Oncol. 2013 Dec;43(6):1833-45. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24064953

      20) Mobile Phones, Cordless Phones and the Risk for Brain Tumors. Hardell L, Carlberg M. International Journal of Oncology, 2009 Jul;35(1):5-17 PMID: 19513546 
http://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/article.jsp?article_id=ijo_35_1_5

      21) Oxidative damage in chemical teratogenesis. Wells PG . Mutat Res. 1997 Dec 12;396(1-2):65-78.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9434860

      22) Swedish review strengthens grounds for concluding that radiation from cellular and cordless phones is a probable human carcinogen. Dr. Devra Davis. Pathophysiology. Volume 20, issue 2, Pages 123–129, April 2013

      23) Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environ Health Perspect. Rice D. 108(suppl 3):511–533 (2000). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.281.957

      24) Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environ Health Perspect. Rice D. 108(suppl 3):511–533 (2000). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.281.957

      25) Electromagnetic noise inhibits radiofrequency radiation-induced DNA damage and reactive oxygen species increase in human lens epithelial cells. Yao K . Mol Vis. 2008 May 19;14:964-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18509546

      26) Neuronal Death and Oxidative Stress in the Developing Brain. Chrysanthy Ikonomidou. ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING Volume 00, Number 0, 2011. https://neurology.wisc.edu/publications/2010%20Pubs/Ikonomidou-5.pdf

      27) Reactive oxygen species elevation and recovery in Drosophila bodies and ovaries following short-term and long-term exposure to DECT base EMF. Manta AK . Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Jun;33(2):118-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781995

      28) Protective effects of melatonin and caffeic acid phenethyl ester against retinal oxidative stress in long-term use of mobile phone: a comparative study. Ozguner F . Mol Cell Biochem. 2006 Jan;282(1-2):83-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16317515

      29) Autism-relevant social abnormalities in mice exposed perinatally to extremely low frequency electromagnetic
      fields. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970316

      30) Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources. Margaritis LH . Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Sep;33(3):165-89. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915130

      31) Exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation induces oxidative DNA base damage in a mouse spermatocyte-derived cell line. Liu C . Toxicol Lett. 2013 Mar 27;218(1):2-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23333639

      32) [Metabolic changes in cells under electromagnetic radiation of mobile communication systems]. Iakimenko. IL. Ukr Biokhim Zh. 2011 Mar-Apr;83(2):20-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21851043

      33) Non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway by mobile phone radiation in human endothelial cells: molecular mechanism for cancer- and blood-brain barrier-related effects. Leszczynski D . Differentiation. 2002 May;70(2-3):120-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12076339

      34) Effect of 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation on oxidative stress in rat brain and serum. Bilgici B . Electromagn Biol Med. 2013 Mar;32(1):20-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301880

      35) Behavior and memory evaluation of Wistar rats exposed to 1·8 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Júnior LC . Neurol Res. 2014 Sep;36(9):800-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24620965

      36) Effect of radio-frequency electromagnetic radiations (RF-EMR) on passive avoidance behaviour and hippocampal morphology in Wistar rats. Narayanan SN . Ups J Med Sci. 2010 May;115(2):91-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20095879

      37) Analysis of emotionality and locomotion in radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation exposed rats. Narayanan SN . Neurol Sci. 2013 Jul;34(7):1117-24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22976773

      38) Evaluation of oxidant stress and antioxidant defense in discrete brain regions of rats exposed to 900 MHz radiation. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2014;115(5):260-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25174055

      39) Fetal Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure From 800-1900 Mhz-Rated Cellular Telephones Affects Neurodevelopment and Behavior in Mice. Aldid, T.Nature. Scientific Reports 2, Article number: 312. Feb 18, 2013. http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/120315/srep00312/full/srep00312.html

      40) Cell phone radiation exposure on brain and associated biological systems. Kesari KK . Indian J Exp Biol. 2013 Mar;51(3):187-200. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23678539

      41) Disturbance of the immune system by electromagnetic fields-A potentially underlying cause for cellular damage and tissue repair reduction which could lead to disease and impairment. Johansson O . Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):157-77. Epub 2009 Apr 23. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19398310

      42) Cell phone use and behavioural problems in young children. Divan HA , . J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jun;66(6):524-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21138897

      43) Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Divan HA . Epidemiology. 2008 Jul;19(4):523-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18467962

      44) Maternal cell phone and cordless phone use during pregnancy and behaviour problems in 5-year-old children. Guxens M . J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 May;67(5):432-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23386674

      45) Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats. Mailankot M . Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(6):561-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19578660

      46) Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature. La Vignera S . J Androl. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):350-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799142

      47) Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Agarwal A . Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1318-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18804757

      48) Bioinitiative 2012. http://www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions/

      49) Autism and EMF/RFR? Plausibility of a Pathophysiological Link-Part I. Pathophysiology Volume 20, Issue 3 , 191-209, June 2013. Herbert M, Sage C (2013) . http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(13)00037-0/fulltext

      50) Autism and EMF/RFR? Plausibility of a Pathophysiological Link-Part II. Pathophysiology Volume 20, Issue 3 , 211-234, June 2013. Herbert M, Sage C (2013) http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958031

      51) BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. December 31, 2012. BioInitiative Working Group, Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter. http://www.bioinitiative.org/

      52) Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone Base Stations.
International Journal of Occupational Environmental Health: 16-3, Jul/Sep 2010, p263-267. Khurana V, Hardell L . http://www.brain-surgery.us/Khurana_et_al_IJOEH-Base_Station_RV.pdf

      53) Shallow Minds: How the Internet and Wi–Fi in Schools Can Affect Learning. Cindy Lee Russell, MD. Oct 2013 issue SCCMA Bulletin. http://issuu.com/18621/docs/bulletin_1013_web or http://www.sccma-mcms.org/Portals/19/assets/docs/Wi-Fi%20in%20Schools%20rev.pdf for full references

      54) Autism Rising Part 1. Dr. Cindy Russell. May/June SCCMA Bulletin 2014
http://www.sccma-mcms.org/NewsEvents/BulletinMemberMagazine.aspx or http://www.sccma-mcms.org/Portals/19/•Autism%20Rising%20Part%201.pdf

      55) Autism Rising Part 2 . Dr. Cindy Russell. SCMA Bulletin 2014 http://www.sccma-mcms.org/NewsEvents/BulletinMemberMagazine.aspx or http://www.sccma-mcms.org/Portals/19/assets/docs/Autism%20Rising%20Part%202%20rev.pdf

      56) Scientific panel on electromagnetic field health risks: consensus points, recommendations, and rationales. Fragopoulou A . Rev Environ Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;25(4):307-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21268443

      57) Letter American Academy of Pediatrics to FDA on “Reassessment of Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Limits and Policies” published in the Federal Register on June 4, 2013. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941318

      58) Wired vs Wireless in Classrooms. Letter to Los Angeles Unified School District. Feb 2013 from Martha Herbert, Assistant Professor Pediatric Neurology, Harvard Medical School. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940748

      59) The precautionary principle in environmental science. D Kriebel . Environ Health Perspect. Sep 2001; 109(9): 871–876.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1240435/

      60) Environmental Working Group Cell Phone Report 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19576223/EWGs-Cell-Phone-Radiation-Report

      61) WiFi in schools proven dangerous. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KN7VetsCR2I&feature=related

      62) Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs193/en/

      Quote
1 2 3 4 … 6
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!