Will anyone do the right thing?


microwave-radiation-levels
We want to communicate some strategies parents could use to challenge their federal, state and local government officials to get them to enforce existing CA Education code that says whenever improvements are made to school facilities, the school must not introduce toxins or known carcinogens into their facilities, our children’s learning environments. RF/EMF microwave radiation from all sources (including Wi-Fi) was designated as a Class 2B carcinogen in May, 2011 by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer. (Details at http://rfemf.com). Our schools can no longer legally pump this toxic, carcinogenic substance (electricity though the air) into  classrooms. Using wired connectivity instead eliminates this problem completely.

The following is a presentation by Dr. Martin Pall, PhD., Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, presenting to the Oregon State Legislature House Committee on Health Care. Feb 24, 2014. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf3ayl6c4Yw

[1] The total cumulative amount of RF/EMF microwave radiation in any classroom is what really matters — radiation from all sources: routers, access point and devices.

[2] The FCC RF/EMF microwave radiation guideline is meaningless because it does not consider total cumulative radiation and only applies to one device; it does not consider the total cumulative radiation from all wireless devices in the room.

[3] Senior engineers at the FCC and OSHA have agreed, in writing, how to calculate total cumulative microwave radiation exposure from any wireless device: the peak power density measured 18″ from the device times the total number of pulses transmitted by each antenna of each wireless device over the entire school day times the length (in fractions of seconds) of the duration of each pulse. When you plug in real numbers, the totals are staggering: at least 8 times higher than the current adult maximum public exposure guideline for RF/EMF microwave radiation for every school day (http://rfemf.com/counter.html).

[4] We have a Watt problem in our country. Watts, delivered over time, is the measure of how much electricity we use. People, in general, are confused about what is a high power (many Watts) and what is low power (fractions of Watts). We falsely think that a bright 100-Watt light bulb is high power and a dim 25-Watt light bulb is low power. The truth is anything in the range of 1-150 Watts is hugely-high power compared to the electricity our bodies use every day to run our heart, our muscles, our kidneys and our brains.

Our cells operate at picoWatts or one trillionth of a Watt. Said another way it takes ten trillion picoWatts to equal 10 watts, which is the the amount of electricity our FCC guideline allows each Wi-Fi device to shoot into the air and through our children’s brains and bodies at over six million miles per hour. It is not at all surprising that electricity that is

[a] ten trillion times higher than natural levels, and that

[b] shoots through our children at over six million miles per hour

might cause their cells to misfire. You think? That’s what’s happening all day long in classrooms with wireless connectivity. Wireless connectivity creates hazardous conditions for our children.

Wi-Fi is electricity sprayed into the air at very high speeds. It is designed to penetrate  through wood, concrete and our children. So if our children are allowed to get 10 watts of electricity through the air from one device, what if we have 24 devices in a classroom? That is 240 watts. Do you want 240 Watts of electricity shooting through your children’s brains and bodies, six hours a day, 180 days per year?

What are our school officials thinking? Wireless signals at the very same levels in classrooms today was used as a weapon in World War II. Our leaders and industry lobbyists just conveniently forgot about that. Apparently, it is more important to have a robust economy based on wireless signals than it is to protect our children’s brains, bodies and future fertility.

Using wired connectivity in schools to distribute our internet traffic through Ethernet wires eliminates this problem. Wireless connectivity offers over 15 times higher bandwidth and much greater security at a lower cost, compared to wired connections. It is a proven solution that exists today.

I called the phone number on the Feb 24, 2014 meeting announcement and spoke to a woman who told me that the HHC-201402241308.ram is a RealPlayer audio file. To play/hear this audio file, I had to download and install the free Realplayer 16 media player software onto my HP/Windows 8 laptop, which I did. RealPlayer can be downloaded for free by clicking the orange button, called  “RealPlayer Free Download” at the top right corner of the following page:

http://www.real.com/resources/windows-media-player-comparison/The woman also provided the following link, which has links to all of the pdfs.https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2014R1/Committees/HHC/2014-02-24-13-00/MeetingMaterials

I clicked the audio triangle near the top of this page, which downloaded the file called ‘HHC-201402241308.ram’ to my ‘Downloads’ folder. I then double-clicked the file ‘HHC-201402241308.ram’ and it started streaming the 1:08:00 audio file to my RealPlayer software.

I just listened to Dr. Martin Pall’s and Dr. Paul Dart’s excellent 2/24/14 presentation to the State of Oregon’s House Committee On Health Care and read the supporting documents (which I uploaded to my public DropBox for easy access). Just click the following links to download the any of the documents to your computer or device.

2014-0224-Oregon-State-Health-Care-Committee.pdf (the meeting announcement)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Oregon-State-Health-Care-Committee.pdf

2014-0224-Martin-Pall-35597.pdf (the presentation)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Martin-Pall-35597.pdf

2014-0224-Martin-Paul-35551.pdf (scientific paper)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Martin-Paul-35551.pdf

2014-0224-Paul-Dart-35549.pdf (curriculum vitae)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Paul-Dart-35549.pdf

2014-0224-Paul-Dart-35552.pdf (scientific paper)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Paul-Dart-35552.pdf

2014-0224-Paul-Dart-36431.pdf (presentation – part 1)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Paul-Dart-36431.pdf

2014-0224-Paul-Dart-36430.pdf (presentation – part 2)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Paul-Dart-36430.pdf

2014-0224-Shawn-Abrell-35793.pdf (presentation)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Shawn-Abrell-35793.pdf

2014-0224-Recording-Log.pdf (time log of speakers)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33504620/2014-0224-Recording-Log.pdf

I will send this information to all of my school administrators who have the legal responsibility, accountability and liability to provide a safe learning environment for our public schools. I would encourage each of them to spend the 1-2 hours it takes to listen to this presentation, review the supporting materials and then take appropriate, effective actions:

1. Immediately stop all installation of wireless networking equipment and infrastructure in CA public schools and switch these Common Core funds to improving the schools’ existing wired networking infrastructure instead. A very good solution, complete with 3D classroom drawings, can be seen at http://rfemf.com.

2. Ban the use of any educational device that does not offer a wired connectivity option. This leaves a lot of devices on the ‘approved list’: Android tablets, Windows 8 tablets, ChomeOS Chromebooks, any netbooks and any laptops that enable the use of Micro-USB-to-USB-to-Ethernet adapters. This leaves the Apple iPad on the ‘unapproved list’, until Apple creates a Lightning-to-USB-to-Ethernet adapter and sofware driver that will enable wired connectivity. This is a simple problem that Apple could solve in a few months, with enough pressure from schools.

3. Anyone who has the legal responsibility, accountability and liability for providing a safe environment in public schools, please do not ignore this critically important information.

TRY CLICKING THE SMALL CIRCLE NEXT TO THE DATE OF THE PRESENTATION:  FEB 24.  THAT’LL DO IT.  STARTS AT ABOUT 8 MINUTES.
DM
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:08 AM, Malone Debbie <debbie.malone@state.or.us> wrote:
Rep. Keny –Guyer’s office asked if a cd could be made of the Microwave  portion of the informational meeting. I contacted media and informed the representative a cd would be possible. I was under the impression the arrangements for the cd were with Rep. Keny-Guyer. I did not inquired about a dvd but a cd.  I will happy to contact media about a dvd for you or you may contact them at 503-986- 1196.  Here is the link to the 2/24 meeting. https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2014R1/Committees/HHC/2014-02-24-13-00/MeetingMaterials  If you have any questions please contact me.                                                         
Debbie Malone
Committee Assistant

House Health Care

  1. #1 by Dr. Martin Pall Presentation on March 19, 2014 - 1:12 pm

    • #2 by Joe Imbriano on March 20, 2014 - 9:18 am

      In 2002, the US Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (ATBCB) stated “The Board recognizes…electromagnetic sensitivities may be considered disabilities under the ADA if they so severely impair the neurological, respiratory and other functions of an individual that it substantially limits one or more of the individual’s major life activities.

      In 2005, the US National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) issued an Indoor Environmental Quality Report which concluded: “For people who are electromagnetically sensitive, the presence of cell phones and towers, portable telephones, computers,…wireless devices, security and scanning equipment, microwave ovens, electric ranges and numerous other electrical appliances can make a building inaccessible.”

      In 2013, the letter to the FCC from the American Academy of Environmental Medicine stated: “It became clear to AAEM physicians that by the mid 1990’s patients were experiencing adverse health reactions and disease as a result of exposure to electromagnetic fields. In the last five years (2008-2013), with the advent of wireless devices, there has been an exponential increase in the number of patients with radiofrequency induced disease and hypersensitivity…..By recognizing electromagnetic sensitivity (statements of ATBCB and NIBS herein), the federal government and affiliated organizations are clearly acknowledging the existence of non-thermal effects.”

      John McPhee
      > Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety
      > Doctors Wireless and Radiation Network (WARN)

    • #3 by Joe Imbriano on March 20, 2014 - 9:23 am

      “John,

      You are bang on with that. It is known and referenced in exposure codes in Canada, the same standards as the FCC as well as others. Safety Code 6 says unintentional stimulation of excitable tissue is to be avoided. Experimental studies show it can lead to nerve and muscle depolarization(EMF trigger like opening your car door remotely) Dr. William Bailey of Exponent Inc admitted under cross examination by me that frequencies triggered nerves in labs and that the nervous, hormonal and immune systems work together.

      What happens to a person whose immune system isn’t working? What happens when all 3 are compromised?

      Exposure codes like building, electrical or other codes are designed to protect the public. Exposure codes are the only code I have ever seen admitting they are missing causation but industry moved forward with it anyway. Engineers or electrical professionals would never proceed with critical science missing.

      That medical education program you lectured in was the first medical program in the world lecturing causation and biological plausibility. That reflects what all of you have done and was the basis of the investigation that went into finding causation. Causation in this case is so technically complex with everything in the wireless circuits and the reason it requires electrical interpretations. We design and build circuits and a wireless circuit is still a circuit.

      EHS or electrocution cases have failed because causation wasn’t proven as verified by Alan Rivaldo for the Texas PUC. Causation wasn’t proven because you can’t have well intended professionals or others represent or qualify electricity.

      Believe it that IEEE will also be on your side. They are insured for errors and omissions as well. They shouldn’t have followed the heating water molecule concept but did because they aren’t medical professionals. They did and do not know that millions, billions or trillions of electrical, frequency or other information was kept out of this complex electrical equation. When you mix 2 frequencies, Dr. Yakov Scholnikov confirmed under cross examination you get 4 resultant frequencies. What happens when you mix millions or billions of frequencies and the calculations change as the person or their moving biological systems change their orientation to the RF EMFs? They could NEVER calculate it and would NEVER substantiate safety as applied.

      Even for me, medicine asked me what it means if a cell has voltages, inductance, capacitance, organs have different frequencies etc? I asked them if that was true and they were shocked I didn’t know. I replied if we can’t use you in an electrical circuit, we don’t consider your electrical properties. In an electrical circuit we know EVERYTHING about the circuit and all of it can be proven. There are real reasons we wire the world and one reason is to keep people from being part of the electrical circuit.

      There are going to be some IEEE members that will not be happy about causation found but they should have done their homework as we did to see causation admitted to be missing. It sets off alarm bells as we would never move forward until cause was found because of the liability.

      Don’t think I am just here yapping at you about this and telling you what to do. I can’t even disclose what is going on in Canada…yet.

      With regards to the reporting of the AAEM, causation being lectured in medical education now substantiates them except they haven’t been told causation was found yet. Causation lectured for continuing medical education credits substantiates Carpenter, Trower, Havas, CST, Blanc, Olle, bio initiative, etc, etc. You have all the ammo you need and that reckoning is coming for those that did their jobs and those that did not.

      You need to share with lobbyists causation has been found and reported. I don’t care how much money they have, wealthy people go to jail as well for reckless endangerment, criminal negligence causing death. The FCC and any elite that think they are exempt from criminal prosecution killing people or causing ecocide better get their heads out of their ass. Are moms and dads going to excuse them for killing their children or pets? Obamacare or any care will bankrupt the country as well as others. As an employer, I am NOT picking up the health costs associated with blanket radiation and killing or suffering of the people in our employ.

      Lawyers are under the illusion that it will costs 100s of thousands or more to prove this? That has been done now and they don’t have to prove anything. They have to represent it, electricity, engineering and biology are peer reviewed science. Where did the SAR plastic head ever get to be science or anything peer reviewed? It is an admission of radiation, just not enough to boil your water molecules.”

      Curtis Bennett

      http://thermoguy.com/

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!