Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership.
THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!
#1 by Anonymous on September 5, 2013 - 9:33 am
“You will live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension.” -Nikola Tesla
#2 by Jamie on September 9, 2013 - 10:01 pm
How can these people even sleep at night? If there is even a 1 percent chance this is true, don’t we owe it to the children to exercise caution? Who are these 1000 people at the County level?
#3 by Joe Imbriano on September 9, 2013 - 11:02 pm
While we are on the topic, what is it doing to your boys?
Inquiring minds want to know. So now are the rats in the cage your kids in the FSD classrooms?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22465825
NCBINCBI Logo
Skip to main content
Skip to navigation
Resources
How To
About NCBI Accesskeys
Sign in to NCBI
PubMed
US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health
Search databaseSearch termSearch
AdvancedHelp
Result Filters
Display Settings:AbstractSend to:
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Apr;9(2):223-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
Immunohistopathologic demonstration of deleterious effects on growing rat testes of radiofrequency waves emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices.
Atasoy HI, Gunal MY, Atasoy P, Elgun S, Bugdayci G.
Source
Departments of Pediatrics, Abant Izzet Baysal University School of Medicine, Bolu 14280, Turkey. halilibrahimatasoy@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate effects on rat testes of radiofrequency radiation emitted from indoor Wi-Fi Internet access devices using 802.11.g wireless standards.
METHODS:
Ten Wistar albino male rats were divided into experimental and control groups, with five rats per group. Standard wireless gateways communicating at 2.437 GHz were used as radiofrequency wave sources. The experimental group was exposed to radiofrequency energy for 24 h a day for 20 weeks. The rats were sacrificed at the end of the study. Intracardiac blood was sampled for serum 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine levels. Testes were removed and examined histologically and immunohistochemically. Testis tissues were analyzed for malondialdehyde levels and prooxidant-antioxidant enzyme activities.
RESULTS:
We observed significant increases in serum 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine levels and 8-hydroxyguanosine staining in the testes of the experimental group indicating DNA damage due to exposure (p < 0.05). We also found decreased levels of catalase and glutathione peroxidase activity in the experimental group, which may have been due to radiofrequency effects on enzyme activity (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings raise questions about the safety of radiofrequency exposure from Wi-Fi Internet access devices for growing organisms of reproductive age, with a potential effect on both fertility and the integrity of germ cells. Copyright © 2012 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. PMID: 22465825 [PubMed - in process] LinkOut - more resources
#4 by penchant for change on September 10, 2013 - 5:05 am
Mr. Imbriano, I hope this message finds you and yours well.
I feel deeply compelled to share with you a first hand observation. If you are not already aware, there are several parents here in Fullerton who are working tirelessly around the clock in unison with local school officials and County officials to discredit what is being set forth on this website.
Their goal is, to in fact, create an occlusion of disinformation in the midst of this pipeline of free flowing information that, so far, has been received rather warmly by a growing number of dazed and confused parents.
Most district personnel have been officially advised not to visit this site, discuss the issue and refer all inquiries to the District Office. Their position continues to be unnervingly reinforced within the rank and file.
Mr. Imbriano, one must not forget that they have absolutely no intentions of investigating the facts. Their position is that this agenda is unstoppable. It is their goal to ensure that you are discredited and, your cause, your citations, your assertions and your claims are to be proven to be unsubstantiated. I want you to understand that the select few that have chosen to spend their time ferreting out disinformation are just that; a select few. As Ray had mentioned in a previous comment, the parents deserve better. I wholeheartedly agree with Ray.
The local school board is simply riding the fence as their main concerns lie in self preservation. They can only think in terms of the potential fallout and political ramifications that this controversy holds.
They have proven themselves to be worthless as they jockey for positions in headlines that keep them all out of the line of fire and away from the controversy.
My advice to you is not to trust any of the local or county school officials as they all have been given their orders. Focus instead, on the community at large, the parents and community leaders involved in philanthropy. Hit them where it hurts; hit them in the pocketbook.
One must remain cognizant of the fact that treachery abounds with this crowd.
The fruits of your labors, your tireless and commendable efforts and your dedication to those who don’t know or can’t even pronounce your last name will soon be readily apparent. Remember good things take time.
I wish you and your family the best in the troubled times ahead.
#5 by Joe Imbriano on September 10, 2013 - 9:35 am
Thank you for your insight into all of this as disturbing as it may be. I do appreciate it.
For the record, Trustee Chris Thompson, has and continues to maintain open communications with me. He has also been the only person in any official capacity to advocate on my behalf as a parent and a taxpayer in terms of my requests for information. I strongly feel that he is the only board member that is worthy of his seat. The others appear to be just ignoring the issue. May I remind all involved that this issue is not going away.
#6 by Anonymous on September 10, 2013 - 10:17 am
What can we do about all of the experts that say this is bad for our kids? Wht do we do with all of what they tell us? If so much warnings how do you say nothing is wrong with this?