On March 5, 2013, The Fullerton Informer began the quest to end what we believe to be the largest forced irradiation of school children that the world has ever known. Since that date we have logged close to 3 million hits from all over the world. We are by no means alone ladies and gentlemen.
Yes it all began as a result of an email from the Fullerton School District’s acting superintendent Dr. Robert Pletka. I was previously involved with his office as a result of an investigation into my allegations of mistreatment of my son over at Acacia Elementary which directly involved principal Karen Whisnant and my son’s teacher Stephanie Givens. With the help of Trustee Chris Thompson, my wife and I arranged a meeting with Dr. Pletka to address my concerns. There was a subsequent investigation and upon conclusion of such, Dr. Pletka stated that he continued to believe that our concerns were real and he would take appropriate steps. The subsequent actions taken by the district were not made public but problems had ceased in the interim. It was’t long after that however, that they began again, remained ongoing, and ironically in my opinion, they still continue to this day. Stephanie Givens was awarded teacher of the year. The OC Register awarded Acacia Elementary the title of the number one school in Orange County and the smoke and mirrors hid this bizarre irony for many.
At the time back in March, I felt that the rapport between Dr. Robert Pletka and I was good and the trust was there. I felt that I had his ear and he was willing to advocate for much needed change at Acacia. Meanwhile, Acacia school began a pilot program in my son’s GATE class which involved room 7 to go wireless. It was my choice at the time to subsequently remove my son from the GATE class when they decided several months into the school year to abandon pencil and paper and go 1:1 with Ipads. At the time I had no idea that entire school had WiFi systems that permeated every room. When I provided Dr. Robert Pletka with several links to articles, scientists’ claims, and videos that warn that the wireless classroom model had potential dangers, he responded to me that we have both formulated our opinions over a long time and a few articles here or there were not going to change either of our minds. He then sent me some outdated links from the W.H.O. and information from industry links from Cisco and the like. The emails continued back and forth for a short period but resulted in no progress. He never offered to personally meet and discuss these concerns. His mind was already made up. When Karen Whisnant was presented with this information, she as usual, responded with placation first and foremost, and then, as always, followed it up with patronization, thanking me for the thought provoking information. Of course nothing else was forthcoming from her. It was their display of authoritative arrogance coupled with the low road my son walked for months at Acacia that ushered in the dawn of and the tone of this movement as it involved the F.S.D.
The Fullerton School District is home to some 14,000+ students in grades K-8. Many of these students, unbeknownst to me, were already using WiFi enabled devices. I found Dr. Pletlka’s Facebook page was riddled with photos of children in the F.S.D. using laptops and Ipads many literally resting down where they should be nowhere near. What’s more, I found out that there were plans to go 1:1 throughout the entire district and Acacia was ground zero for the roll out. It turns out that this is what Dr. Robert Pletka had done in his previous stint in the San Diego County schools. The most vulnerable segment of the student population in Fullerton was slated for receiving the most microwave emissions exposure, more than that of the high school district. This to me was shocking. The next step was for me to continue disseminating information regarding this issue to Dr. Pletka and Karent Whisnant which I did to no avail.
The more I researched into this issue, the more horrified I had become. Within a matter of days, I began to question the various high schools if they indeed were wireless as of yet. I was told no. It was at that time we had requested a meeting with Dr. Giokaris and Dr. Williams from the F.J.U.H.S.D. to discuss our concerns. They agreed to meet with us and listen to our concerns. What seemed unusual at that time was the room adjacent to our meeting was full of district staff while Dr. Giokaris had his chair in the doorway to ensure the door remained open. It was obvious that a larger audience was in attendance. In the meantime, they were very open and up front about their plans and timeline. He agreed to review the information and that was back in March of this year. There had been no formal contact initiated by his office until around labor day weekend when Dr. Williams called to schedule a meeting to discuss the F.J.U.H.S.D.’s technology plan.
In the meantime, in the F.S.D., the rollout of the Ipad programs and the installation of the enterprise class Cisco wireless access points continued to encompass every school in the District. While this continued, I appeared at virtually every school board meeting jamming this website down their throats, with handouts followed by my three minute diatribes dressing them down, asking them not to proceed, and the technology expansion just continued to accelerate. I handed out thousands of fliers and information packets to parents over the course of several months on numerous occasions, and sent mass emails to every school and administrative office in the entire Fullerton School District. Aside from the frightened parents, not one response from anyone in the F.S.D. except Trustee Chris Thompson and one other board member that said she was looking into it. At one board meeting an F.S.D. teacher refused to accept one of my handouts because he said “I was told not to accept it….my superiors may have a problem with it…”
In the F.J.U.H.S.D., however, something very different was going on. They were actually investigating what we alleged and put their plans on hold as a result. Consequently, I continued to attend the F.J.U.H.S.D. board meetings and politely presented information and informed the board, administrative staff, and principals of the potential dangers of the proliferation of this technology. They were given handouts including the Autism hypothesis I wrote. As I stood at the door of the room handing out information to teachers and parents, not one refused the handouts. Aside from some concerned parents, months had gone by and not one single F.J.U.H.S.D. member of staff, employee or board member reached out to me with a phone call or an email.
Meanwhile, in the F.S.D., my visits to the board meetings continued parallel to the F.J.U.H.S.D meetings but with a different tone and demeanor. The blog articles went along the same lines as the meetings. The basic tenet of the argument was questioning how when presented with all of the information over the course of several months, how did it appear that the F.S.D. continued to ignore it, not reach out to me, call a meeting to discuss an issue such as this and the whole time step on the gas and accelerate its roll out?
So here we have Dr. Giokaris putting plans on hold while investigating, and Dr. Pletka stepping on the gas. July came with a bang with the RF report released by the F.S.D. showing impossibly low microwave radiation levels in the classroom at my child’s school and a blanket total safety statement flying in the face of everything I had presented signed by,you guessed it, Dr. Robert Pletka.
Yesterday The Fullerton Informer met with Dr. George Giokaris and Dr. Jennifer Williams and they confirmed that based on their research and findings, in spite of the thousands of scientific studies that show harm, that they are proceeding with the district technology plan with virtually no changes except for the fact that the access points will not be located in classrooms. That statement by Dr. Williams, in my opinion,proves that they are cognizant of the fact that there is some risk associated with these devices. Why else would they not locate them in the classrooms. Dr. Giokaris was asked point blank by myself, how many hours did he personally invest in researching this issue on this website and he declined to state. What is not clear to him is that the IP tracking logs had answered that question long before I asked it. After a rather lengthy discussion that even bordered on philosophical at times, we wrapped it up but not before I laid it all out to both of them like no other human being that they will ever meet for the rest of their lives. The meeting went well. They both agreed to disagree with us. I parted ways and shook his hand and bid Dr. George well and reminded Dr. Williams to remind her friends that Autism is a disease of electromagnetic exposure and not food allergies. It was clear to me she didn’t read it either.
The point of all of this is that The Fullerton Informer, much like a coin, has two sides. It can flip rather easily I might add. We simultaneously chose two parallel paths to deal with the same issue with two separate school districts based on the footings established by each district’s respective administrators. We took two roads. The high road was chosen in our dealings with the F.J.U.H.S.D. and Dr. George Giokaris as he began the journey by listening and applying the brake. The low road was taken with the F.S.D. and Dr. Robert Pletka as he began the journey by dismissing the information and stepping on the gas.
Heck we even took a side road along the way when we took our gig to the June 27th A.S.C.I.P meeting and they made us shut off our camera. It got a Bagley-Keene Act violation investigation going with the AG but at least I got to meet the big cheese attorney, and got to see the some familiar and some not so familiar faces that are all actively involved in flipping the switch to irradiate school kids all over the golden state.
Ironically, understanding full well, the nature of the command and control educational bureaucracy, the top down edicts from the Executive Branch down to the techs hanging those Cisco access points on the classroom walls down to the staff loading the Ipad cart, I knew that ultimately all involved would take the low road. I expected this even though some walked with me on the high road. You see folks, this is a big deal and in my opinion, there is no bigger deal than what I believe to be this insidious, stealth threat to if not an attack on our children’s fertility. The telecom laws protect the RF industry and the school officials, FCC exposure guidelines set 100 million times higher than some of the most cultured Europeans open the floodgates for the proliferation, Madison avenue has you and your kids hook line and sinker, and of course the CTA and CalPers have the golden handcuffs on the certificated staff to where they can’t say no even though the union contracts are strong enough for them all to simultaneously stand on top of and stop this. The administrators can’t break rank for fear of loss of reputation, fear of conflict with parents or superiors, or loss of their peace of mind having to wonder if they will be watched over like those trying to stop this by those trying to implement it at the highest levels. Sadly for some it is simply a religion relegated to merely fill the void. It is that void that the pursuit of the insatiable gods of materialism and status have left inside as their backs continue to turn on the children with the kids always coming last in all of the decisions. Don’t tell me they come first. I have read the contracts, the minutes and the agendas. Look at the payroll, look at the busted up black top, look at the benefits costs and look at the drinking fountains, look at the shortened school year and look at the class sizes, look at the administration costs and look at the fiddle playing the parents for everything under the sun, look at the paycheck and look at the lead pipes, look at the orthodontic plan and look at the asbestos tiles, look at the wireless health risks and look what your kids are using instead of text books. I could go on.
So as a result, the children are to be condemned for the rest of their lives to 24/7 microwave emissions in the classroom, in the gym, multipurpose room, library, restaurants, trains, airports, and at home for hours on end with these pulse modulated high frequency microwave transmitters sitting and emitting in their precious little laps in direct proximity to their sensitive developing reproductive areas. In return, everyone involved gets to get excited about all this Trojan horse called 21st century learning with the common core oozing out of its orifices, they mistakenly think that they get to keep their jobs, get to go wine tasting and eat bacon in Europe this summer all the while this stuff is going to put them all out of work someday sooner than they can imagine.
It has been my suspicion and contention all along that at the highest levels, this is part of an agenda to affect human fertility, specifically aimed at the female ovum in our young girls and the sperm in the pubescent boys with Autism merely being an unintended consequence. Think of where these devices are most of the time. THERE ARE NO LONG TERM STUDIES ON THIS ANYWHERE AND I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS BY DESIGN. THIS IS UNCHARTED TERRITORY FOLKS. Dr. Robert Pletka and Dr. George Giokaris just set sail with your kids on board down in steerage. You wonder why they don’t want to sail the thing in my direction? I believe that they are afraid to stand up for the kids a midst this uncertainty. I have heard multiple administrators tell me that “Joe-all the districts are doing this… it is the way the world is going…” So if everyone is jumping off of the Brooklyn Bridge do we follow them?
When I look into the eyes of the staff, board members, and parents that are involved in this debate, I see fear, I see worry, I see shame. Everyone knows this stuff can’t be good. Few have the courage to stand up against it. It is easier to delve into the bottle or some other escape than to face this head on. Once you do try to face this reality, you have to come up against it all because this stuff is going in everywhere. But hey, are the kids not worth it? Like I have said in prior posts, some of the most foolish people that I have ever known were the most educated.
I knew all along that both roads would ultimately lead us to the same destination. I understand that it is easier to arrive if you take the road everyone else is on. You can’t get lost by yourself that way, you simply get lost with everyone else that way. For servile school administrators to trust in antiquated and inadequate FCC exposure guidelines that are 100 million times higher than those of some Europeans that ignore an entire realm of effects, to not personally investigate the issue and relegate the researching to their insurance companies and risk managers, to keep looking the other way and ignore piles and piles of scientific studies and evidence warning of the potential dangers to the children of unprecedented pulse modulated microwave high frequency radiation levels in Fullerton’s classrooms that are trillions of times higher than the levels 50 years ago that our parents lived with, in my opinion is despicable. I believe that we might as well stick Bob and George in a mold and make rubber stamps out of both of them.
We may not know for years, uttered Dr. Giokaris, We will not know until it is too late says I. Based on the decisions of these two men, who dealt with the two sides of my coin, and walked two different roads on the way, they ended up arriving at the same conclusions which, in my opinion, translates to heads or tails, the kids lose.
Ladies and gentlemen, now that the high and the low roads have come together, the merge sign is in the rear view mirror, with the two roads having converged, may I suggest that all of you look in the rear view mirror and out in front, and be aware of what I have known all along, that the road is slippery when wet. You have been warned. I believe that precaution has been thrown to the wind by these two leaders in spite of the many speed limit and warning signs posted right in front of them along the way. In my opinion, they have willfully chosen to roll the dice with your children’s reproductive health. Do they have that right? Absolutely not!
We will now move to even further expand our information campaign to the parents of the students in the F.J.U.H.S.D. as well as the F.S.D. and the community at large. We welcome you all to this critical debate that is worthy of as much lighting, signage, caution and attention that is humanly capable of being employed and invested so that we can begin ending the largest radiation experiment on children that world has ever known. Fasten your seat belts. Give us your two cents worth, stay tuned and please don’t touch that dial.
#1 by Schulzee on September 20, 2013 - 10:29 am
Hey, does anyone know if these EMF meters used to measure these fields are the same devices that ghost hunters use? A parent asked me and I said I think so but I wasn’t sure.
#2 by Joe Imbriano on September 20, 2013 - 11:20 am
I believe the ones used by the company that conducted the RF survey for the district were. Maybe that is why the readings were so low because they were measuring the wrong frequency.
I personally like to use the coronet ed85ex model in and around school when kids are in and the gigahertz solution sRF-Analyser HF58B model on campus on the weekends and after hours for real tight readings.
#3 by Ray on September 20, 2013 - 1:22 pm
No, they are not, but it doesn’t surprise me that you would given them your opinion without any knowledge on the subject.
#4 by Schulzee on September 20, 2013 - 4:11 pm
Actually, yes they are. See post below from 11:39 am.
#5 by Schulzee on September 20, 2013 - 4:44 pm
Well, I do have some knowledge on the subject but as I was not sure I told them that… as I said. Now Joe said that the ones the school district used may be used by ghost busters and as I know he owns them, I would take his word over yours. Notice the site below: “Meet the EMC meter, the little tool that ghost hunters swear by” That’s pretty clear to me..
#6 by Schulzee on September 20, 2013 - 5:01 pm
Sorry…. EMF meter, not EMC
#7 by Ray on September 21, 2013 - 3:53 pm
Schulze, you continue to demonstrate a lack of comprehension.
None of those devices depicted on that website could even detect RF microwave radiation.
How do I know? I have over 20 years experience measuring EMR radiation
#8 by Robert A. on September 21, 2013 - 4:39 pm
From what I understand, they won’t give Joe permission to go in and conduct a survey with calibrated equipment and a film crew. I don’t get your point. I believe that your question needs to be directed to the firm that the district hired for the RF survey conducted at taxpayer expense.
In addition, it would be of interest to make public what the District was charged for that very questionable report. It appears to not line up with any results that I have ever seen.
#9 by Schulzee on September 22, 2013 - 5:06 pm
Wait! That does it, Joe was specifically told not to calibrate his equipment??? I’m taking this up with the board. Not sure why he would need a film crew, he making a movie? Getting all the releases signed wouldn’t happen anyway. And yes, I would have never supported the expense of a RF survey. I could have told you they would find non-thermal levels, as has Joe, and since non-thermal levels have not been proven to be harmful it doesn’t matter much how high or low they are, does it?
#10 by Joe Imbriano on September 22, 2013 - 6:23 pm
I was told that I could not conduct an RF study. I am not going to come in to a room full of kids with the big wand with the big antenna. At this point, I observed that the same RF levels are present as if they are all using cell phones all day. I have been awaiting permission for calibrated equipment and a film crew to conduct an RF survey and study in my son’s classroom. In the meantime, my little handheld is very accurate and simple to use. It appears to be far more accurate than the equipment Executive Environmental used as the first time that they came in, they couldn’t even detect WiFi emissions. Heck a cell phone with the right app does better than that.
Instead of you and your wife taking up issue with my handy equipment, have your wife ask around Cal State Fullerton and see if she can get some local experts to chime in over here and comment on what we paid big money for in terms of the RF survey and the readings they reported. It should be interesting. There is plenty of talk over there and it would be nice if a few came out of the woodwork and joined the club here. It would do the community good.
Your last statement is the whole kit and kaboodle Roman. In my opinion, it is that dark magic phrase, that lie from the pit of hell that is ensuring the best laid plans of those with the most nefarious of intentions, proceeds in high gear right under our noses.
Movie you bet. You will be in it as well very soon as soon as you cozy up to mic at the board meetings.
#11 by Schulzee on September 22, 2013 - 11:36 pm
You flatter yourself thinking anybody at CSUF has time to concern themselves with this. They are busy teaching science.
Thinking you are going to film people without their consent? This should be interesting.
#12 by amateur night on September 22, 2013 - 11:57 pm
You off your meds Schulzeepoo? He doesn’t need their consent to film them in a public place and at public meetings you moron.
#13 by Schulzee on September 23, 2013 - 8:50 am
Well, I’m definitely off my meds. And technically you are right. However, I assumed he wanted to show the video or even post it on-line or on YouTube.
“It does not matter if it is professional or not, you are posting the video to a public media. It is no different than publishing a photo in your local paper, you MUST have consent or you can be sued if showing a person’s face on the video. It does not matter if there is no money involved, the people in the video must still give consent. Your last point, “it will be public” is what requires the consent form to be signed. If it was merely a project for school and would remain in the confines of the class you could do this, but when you turn it into something public, you have certain legal responsibilities and should want to protect yourself from future lawsuits.”
Now, if me being a moron helps in any way that’s fine. The key thing we need to understand is that my moronocity does not make me wrong just as yours would not make you right.
Interestingly enough I thought what you said was true but then I remembered seeing blurred out faces on shows like “COPS” or hidden video type shows and wondered why they would have to do that. I then used the powers of the interweb to help reduce the chances of my erring.
#14 by Bozo Esq. on September 23, 2013 - 12:19 pm
What the heck you are talking about?
#15 by Anonymous on September 23, 2013 - 12:06 pm
The Bagley-Keene Act applies to all specified state boards, commissions, agencies, committees and advisory groups of such multimember bodies. Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 11121, 11121.2, 11121.7 and 11121.8.
The Brown Act applies to the legislative body of a local agency or any other local body created by state or federal law, including all counties, cities, towns, school districts, municipal corporations, districts, political subdivisions or any board, commission or agency thereof. Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 54951, 54952. The Legislature intended that all state and local agencies be included under the provisions of some open meeting act, unless expressly excluded. Torres v. Board of Commissioners, 89 Cal. App.3d 545, 549, 152 Cal. Rptr. 506
#16 by Schulzee on September 23, 2013 - 6:57 pm
Don’t know the Bagley-Keene act or the Brown act but I’m willing to be educated. I did notice what was posted above did not mention a classroom. Do we consider a classroom a legislative body? How odd.
#17 by He sees nothing on September 23, 2013 - 5:43 pm
For out very own Schulze –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GJy_WgDVoo
#18 by that's our Schulze on September 24, 2013 - 3:43 am
too funny!!