The two sides of The Fullerton Informer’s two cents.


On March 5, 2013, The Fullerton Informer began the quest to end what we believe to be the largest forced irradiation of school children that the world has ever known.  Since that date we have logged close to 3 million hits from all over the world. We are by no means alone ladies and gentlemen.

Yes it all began as a result of an email from the Fullerton School District’s acting superintendent Dr. Robert Pletka.   I was previously involved with his office as a result of an investigation into my allegations of mistreatment of my son over at Acacia Elementary which directly involved principal Karen Whisnant and my son’s teacher Stephanie Givens. With the help of Trustee Chris Thompson, my wife and I arranged a meeting with Dr. Pletka to address my concerns. There was a subsequent investigation and upon conclusion of such, Dr. Pletka stated that he continued to believe that our concerns were real and he would take appropriate steps. The subsequent actions taken by the district were not made public but problems had ceased in the interim. It was’t long after that however, that they began again, remained ongoing, and ironically in my opinion, they still continue to this day. Stephanie Givens was awarded teacher of the year. The OC Register awarded Acacia Elementary the title of the number one school in Orange County and the smoke and mirrors  hid this bizarre irony for many.
At the time back in March, I felt that the rapport between Dr. Robert Pletka and I was good and the trust was there. I felt that I had his ear and he was willing to advocate for much needed change at Acacia.  Meanwhile,  Acacia school began a pilot program in my son’s GATE class which involved room 7  to go wireless. It was my choice at the time to subsequently remove my son from the GATE class when they decided several months into the school year to abandon pencil and paper and go 1:1 with Ipads. At the time I had no idea that entire school had WiFi systems that permeated every room. When I provided Dr. Robert Pletka with several links to articles, scientists’ claims, and videos that warn that the wireless classroom model had potential dangers, he responded to me that we have both formulated our opinions over a long time and a few articles here or there were not going to change either of our minds.  He then sent me some outdated links from the W.H.O. and information from  industry links from Cisco and the like. The emails continued back and forth for a short period but resulted in no progress. He never offered to personally meet and discuss these concerns. His mind was already made up. When Karen Whisnant was presented with this information, she as usual, responded with placation first and foremost, and then, as always, followed it up with patronization, thanking me for the thought provoking information. Of course nothing else was forthcoming from her. It was their display of authoritative arrogance coupled with the low road my son walked for months at Acacia that ushered in the dawn of and the tone of this movement as it involved the F.S.D.

The Fullerton School District is home to some 14,000+ students in grades K-8. Many of these students, unbeknownst to me, were already using WiFi enabled devices.  I found Dr. Pletlka’s Facebook page was riddled with photos of children in the F.S.D. using laptops and Ipads many literally resting down where they should be nowhere near.  What’s more, I found out that there were plans to go 1:1 throughout the entire district and Acacia was ground zero for the roll out. It turns out that this is what Dr. Robert Pletka had done in his previous stint in the San Diego County schools. The most vulnerable segment of the student population in Fullerton was slated for receiving the most microwave emissions exposure, more than that of the high school district. This to me was shocking. The next step was  for me to continue disseminating information regarding this issue to Dr. Pletka and Karent Whisnant which I did to no avail.

The more I researched into this issue, the more horrified I had become.  Within a matter of days, I began to question the various high schools if they indeed were wireless as of yet. I was told no. It was at that time we had requested a meeting with Dr. Giokaris and Dr. Williams from the F.J.U.H.S.D. to discuss our concerns. They agreed to meet with us and listen to our concerns. What seemed unusual at that time was the room adjacent to our meeting was full of district staff while Dr. Giokaris had his chair in the doorway to ensure the door remained open. It was obvious that a larger audience was in attendance. In the meantime, they were very open and up front about their plans and timeline.  He agreed to review the information and that was back in March of this year. There had been no formal contact initiated by his office until around labor day weekend when Dr. Williams called  to schedule a meeting to discuss the F.J.U.H.S.D.’s technology plan.

In the meantime, in the F.S.D., the rollout of the Ipad programs and the installation of the enterprise class Cisco wireless access points continued to encompass every school in the District. While this continued, I appeared at virtually every school board meeting jamming this website down their throats, with handouts followed by my three minute diatribes dressing them down, asking them not to proceed, and the technology expansion just continued to accelerate. I handed out  thousands of fliers and information packets to parents over the course of several months on numerous occasions, and sent mass emails to every school and administrative office in the entire Fullerton School District. Aside from the frightened parents, not one response from anyone in the F.S.D. except Trustee Chris Thompson and one other board member that said she was looking into it.  At one board meeting an F.S.D. teacher refused to accept one of my handouts because he said “I was told not to accept it….my superiors may have a problem with it…”

In the F.J.U.H.S.D., however,  something very different was going on. They were actually investigating what we alleged and put their plans on hold as a result.  Consequently, I continued to attend the F.J.U.H.S.D. board meetings and politely presented information and informed the board, administrative staff, and principals of the potential dangers of the proliferation of this technology. They were given handouts including the Autism hypothesis I wrote. As I stood at the door of the room handing out information to teachers and parents, not one refused the handouts. Aside from some concerned parents, months had gone by and not one  single F.J.U.H.S.D. member of staff, employee or board member reached out to me with a phone call or an email.

Meanwhile, in the F.S.D., my visits to the board meetings continued parallel to the F.J.U.H.S.D meetings but with a different tone and demeanor. The blog articles went along the same lines as the meetings. The basic tenet of the argument was questioning how when presented with all of the information over the course of several months, how did it appear that the F.S.D. continued to ignore it, not reach out to me, call a meeting to discuss an issue such as this and the whole time step on the gas and accelerate its roll out?

So here we have Dr. Giokaris putting plans on hold while investigating, and Dr. Pletka stepping on the gas. July came with a bang with the RF report released by the F.S.D. showing impossibly low microwave radiation levels in the classroom at my child’s school and a blanket total safety statement flying in the face of everything I had presented signed by,you guessed it,  Dr. Robert Pletka.

Yesterday The Fullerton Informer met with Dr. George Giokaris and Dr. Jennifer Williams and they confirmed that based on their research and findings, in spite of the thousands of scientific studies that show harm,  that they are proceeding with the district technology plan with virtually no changes except for the fact that the access points will not be located in classrooms.  That statement by Dr. Williams, in my opinion,proves that they are cognizant of the fact that there is some risk associated with these devices. Why else would they not locate them in the classrooms. Dr. Giokaris was asked point blank by myself, how many hours did he personally invest in researching this issue on this website and  he declined to state.  What is not clear to him is that the IP tracking logs had answered that question long before I asked it. After a rather lengthy discussion that even bordered on philosophical at times, we wrapped it up but not before I laid it all out to both of them like no other human being that they will ever meet for the rest of their lives. The meeting went well. They both agreed to disagree with us. I parted ways and shook his hand and bid Dr. George well and reminded Dr.  Williams to remind her friends that Autism is a disease of electromagnetic exposure and not food allergies. It was clear to me she didn’t read it either.

The point of all of this is that The Fullerton Informer, much like a coin, has two sides. It can flip rather easily I might add. We simultaneously chose two parallel paths to deal with the same issue with two separate school districts based on the footings established by each district’s respective administrators. We took two roads. The high road was chosen in our dealings with the F.J.U.H.S.D. and Dr. George Giokaris as he began the journey by listening and applying the brake.  The low road was taken with the F.S.D. and Dr. Robert Pletka as he began the journey by dismissing the information and stepping on the gas.

Heck we even took a side road along the way when we took  our gig to the June 27th A.S.C.I.P meeting and they made us shut off our camera.  It got a Bagley-Keene Act violation investigation going with the AG but at least I got to meet the big cheese attorney, and got to see the some familiar and some not so familiar faces that are all actively involved in flipping the switch to irradiate school kids all over the golden state.

Ironically, understanding full well, the nature of the command and control educational bureaucracy, the top down edicts from the Executive Branch down to the techs hanging those Cisco access points on the classroom walls down to the staff loading the Ipad cart, I knew that ultimately all involved would take the low road. I expected this even though some walked with me on the high road. You see folks, this is a big deal and in my opinion, there is no bigger deal than what I believe to be this insidious, stealth threat to if not an attack on our children’s fertility. The telecom laws protect the RF industry and the school officials, FCC exposure guidelines set 100 million times higher than some of the most cultured Europeans open the floodgates for the proliferation,  Madison avenue has you and your kids hook line and sinker, and of course the CTA and CalPers have the golden handcuffs on the certificated staff to where they can’t say no even though the union contracts are strong enough for them all to simultaneously stand on top of and stop this. The administrators can’t break rank for fear of loss of reputation, fear of conflict with parents or superiors, or loss of their peace of mind having to wonder if they will be watched over like those trying to stop this by those trying to implement it at the highest levels. Sadly for some it is simply a religion relegated to merely fill the void. It is that void that the pursuit of the insatiable gods of materialism and status have left inside as their backs continue to turn on the children with the kids always coming last in all of the decisions. Don’t tell me they come first. I have read the contracts, the minutes and the agendas. Look at the payroll, look at the busted up black top, look at the benefits costs and look at the drinking fountains, look at the shortened school year and look at the class sizes, look at the administration costs and look at the fiddle playing the parents for everything under the sun, look at the paycheck and look at the lead pipes, look at the orthodontic plan and look at the asbestos tiles, look at the wireless health risks and look what your kids are using instead of text books. I could go on.

So as a result,  the children  are to be condemned  for the rest of their lives to 24/7 microwave emissions in the classroom, in the gym, multipurpose room, library, restaurants,  trains, airports, and at home for hours on end with these  pulse modulated high frequency microwave transmitters sitting and emitting in their precious little laps in direct proximity to their sensitive developing reproductive areas. In return, everyone involved gets to get excited about all this Trojan horse called 21st century learning with the common core oozing out of its orifices, they mistakenly think that they get to keep their jobs, get to go wine tasting and eat bacon in Europe this summer all the while this stuff is going to put them all out of work someday sooner than they can imagine.

It has been my suspicion and contention all along that at the highest levels, this is part of an agenda to affect human fertility, specifically aimed at the female ovum in our young girls and the sperm in the pubescent boys with Autism merely being an unintended consequence. Think of where these devices are most of the time.  THERE ARE NO LONG TERM STUDIES ON THIS ANYWHERE AND I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS BY DESIGN. THIS IS UNCHARTED TERRITORY FOLKS. Dr. Robert Pletka and Dr. George Giokaris just set sail with your kids on board down in steerage.  You wonder why they don’t want to sail the thing in my direction?  I believe that they are afraid to stand up for the kids a midst this uncertainty. I have heard multiple administrators tell me that “Joe-all the districts are doing this… it is the way the world is going…”  So if everyone is jumping off of the Brooklyn Bridge do we follow them?

When I look into the eyes of the staff, board members, and parents that are involved in this debate, I see fear, I see worry, I see shame. Everyone knows this stuff can’t be good. Few have the courage to stand up against it. It is easier to delve into the bottle or some other escape than to face this head on. Once you do try to face this reality, you have to come up against it all because this stuff is going in everywhere.  But hey, are the kids not worth it? Like I have said in prior posts, some of the most foolish people that I have ever known were the most educated.

I knew all along that both roads would ultimately lead us to the same destination. I understand that it is easier to arrive if you take the road everyone else is on. You can’t get lost by yourself that way, you simply get lost with everyone else that way. For servile school administrators to trust in antiquated and inadequate FCC exposure guidelines that are 100 million times higher than those of some Europeans that ignore an entire realm of effects, to not personally investigate the issue and relegate the researching to their insurance companies and risk managers, to keep looking the other way and ignore piles and piles of scientific studies and evidence warning of the potential dangers to the children of unprecedented pulse modulated microwave high frequency radiation levels in Fullerton’s classrooms that are trillions of times higher than the levels 50 years ago that our parents lived with, in my opinion is despicable. I believe that we might as well stick Bob and George in a mold and make  rubber stamps out of both of them.

We may not know for years, uttered Dr. Giokaris, We will not know until it is too late says I.  Based on the decisions of these two men, who dealt with the two sides of my coin, and walked two different roads on the way, they ended up arriving at the same conclusions which, in my opinion, translates to heads or tails, the kids lose.

Ladies and gentlemen, now that the high and the low roads have come together, the merge sign is in the rear view mirror, with the two roads having converged, may I suggest that all of you look in the rear view mirror and out in front, and be aware of what I have known all along, that the road is slippery when wet. You have been warned. I believe that precaution has been thrown to the wind by these two leaders in spite of the many speed limit and warning signs posted right in front of them along the way. In my opinion, they have willfully chosen to roll the dice with your children’s reproductive health. Do they have that right? Absolutely not!

We will now move to even further expand our information campaign to the parents of the students in the F.J.U.H.S.D. as well as the F.S.D. and the community at large.  We welcome you all to this critical debate that is worthy of as much lighting, signage, caution and attention that is humanly capable of being employed and invested so that we can begin ending the largest radiation experiment on children that world has ever known. Fasten your seat belts. Give us your two cents worth, stay tuned and please don’t touch that dial.

  1. #1 by Angie B on September 22, 2013 - 7:13 am

    Understanding the science

    Is the jury still out on the health risks of mobile phones?

    We sometimes hear in the press that the “jury is out” when it comes to the health risks of mobile phones. We hear one day about a study showing adverse health effects then another that a research has given them the all clear.

    What are the public to do in the face of this uncertainty?

    At WiredChild we wanted to investigate for ourselves. This is what we found:

    1. All the independently-funded studies that included longer term users (10 years or more use) have shown an association between brain tumour incidence and mobile phone use.

    In a number of studies the risks for some types of tumours is doubled or even quadrupled. The only studies that have not shown such a link were funded by the mobile phone industry or only analysed short-term duration of use. See the studies here…

    Mobile phones have only been used widely since the late 1990’s so the early studies, mostly done in the early 2000’s, didn’t involve long term phone users. They were done when it was too early for the association to show up. This has clouded the picture for the media and the public.

    2. The studies generally under-estimate the risk

    This is because:

    they can only include people who are still alive (as they need to ask about mobile phone habits) so some of those who might have been worst affected are excluded
    many of the people in the control group and treated as un-exposed to the radiation being tested have been exposed through other sources. For example, many of the studies investigating the link between mobile phones and brain cancers have not extracted cordless phone users from the control group which means that the difference between the risks of those classed as users and non-users may be obscured.
    none of the studies into the link between mobile phone use and brain tumours has directly studied children
    The full extent of the risks of using a mobile phone will probably only show up when people have used them for 20 years or more

    3. Not all studies are independent.

    Have a look at the list of brain tumour studies to see which ones are independently-funded. The independently-funded studies that included long-term mobile phone users found an association between mobile phone use and brain tumours, while mostly industry-linked studies found no association, normally having only studied short-term users. One study has demonstrated statistically that the funding source is linked to the results found…

    When an industry wants to discourage concerns about safety, it can muddy the waters by funding research that shows no association, thereby leaving the press and the public confused and uncertain whether they need to act. Sometimes it is not obvious that they have funded the research. Read more…
    The big corporates with significant financial interests in the mobile phone and wireless markets, have skilled PR and other staff able to work the system to the advantage of their corporate interest. Independent scientists and public interest groups, like us, rarely have the resources to counter this effect. You can help by donating here…

    Some studies have small samples. While this reduces the weight they should be given, in our view a small independent study is sometimes more trustworthy than a larger industry-funded study.

    There is now almost no independent funding of research into the effects of wireless technology in the UK. The industry-funded studies dominate in terms of number and consequently dominate the way the public health agencies assess the risk and the way the media reports the risk. Read more…

    Sometimes, conflicts of interest are concealed…

    4. Don’t rely on what you read in the papers.

    Science is complex and studies are not always easy to interpret. Sometimes the media misunderstands.

    Click here for an example of the media misunderstanding the science…

    5. Don’t assume the government will warn you

    The government has to strike a difficult balance between protecting public health and protecting the economy, so it doesn’t just have our children’s health at heart.

    Businesses can put financial pressure on government and also have influence through their networking and lobbying arms. The mobile phone industry contributes about £15 billion a year to government finances. Coupled with expanding tax revenues from the fast-growing wireless industry, and further jackpots when licences are sold off (about £22 billion when they sold off the 3G licences in 2001) these discourage the government from alerting the public to the possibility of health risks.

    Have a look at what happened in the early days of smoking research, and when the BSE scare was reported.

    …In the case of tobacco and lung cancer, debates over whether there was a true increase in lung cancer associated with smoking raged far longer than they should have, fomented by an active disinformation campaign…

    Recalling the 70 years that it took to remove lead from paint and gasoline and the 50 years that it took to convincingly establish the link between smoking and lung cancer, … we must learn from our past to do a better job of interpreting evidence of potential risks.

    Ronald Herberman (Founding Director of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cancer Centres and Hillman Professor of Oncology) in a statement to the US Congress Domestic Policy Subcommittee about cell phone risks

    • #2 by Joe Imbriano on October 4, 2013 - 9:01 am

      The EMF issue will all be blamed on Fukushima thousands and thousands of miles away, diluted by quadrillions of gazillions of gallons of water and a billion gazillion trillions of cubic feet of air which at present are not even sporadically increasing background levels of ionizing radiation more that 50% or so. Yes the disaster in Japan is horrific but pales in comparison to what is being done in our classrooms, bedrooms, backyard, workplaces and even in your laps.

      Meanwhile these unborn children :

      http://www.buzzfeed.com/personhoodusa/top-10-mind-blowing-images-of-human-life-in-the-wo-drqv

      are constantly getting hit by sources, at times inches, instead of oceans away, with trillions of times the normal background levels of microwave radiation from 900 MHz up to 8 GHz from WiFi routers, wireless keyboards, mouses, wireless TV’s, DVRs, security camera systems, video game controllers and consoles, laptops, baby monitors, cell phones, tablets, microwave ovens, cordless phones and their base stations, and whatever else people are bring home, live or work around. None of the experts are concerned about that.

      Don’t worry, nothing to fear. The experts tell us it is safe. Oh the experts the gift that keeps on giving. They bestow upon us a legacy the likes of: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/05/17/up-to-1-in-5-children-suffer-from-mental-disorder-cdc-says/

1 16 17 18 19 20 33
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!