SEEDS NOT EXPOSED TO WIFI
SEEDS EXPOSED TO WIFI
Sure WiFi is safe for growing children, just not for growing seeds.
I believe that a public health crisis is in the process of unfolding right before our very own eyes with 1 in 5 children now being diagnosed with a mental illness: CDC-1 in 5 children suffer from a mental disorder.
We all want what is best for our children. As parents, we all want the best tools for learning, the best schools, the best teachers, and the best curriculum so that our children have a chance at a bright future in an extremely competitive world. There is no doubt about the need for technology. It is here to stay. It is because of it that you are reading this. But why does it all have to be wireless? What about the health and safety concerns as they relate to our children? Could these emissions be harming our children? What is wrong with wires connected to computers? That is our contention: hard wire the devices in light of the recent L.A.U.S.D EXPERT TESTIMONY and the recent letter sent to the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees on 5-13-13 that all strongly suggest that WiFi is not safe for children in a room full of wireless transmitters (tablets).
We at the FullertonInformer.com submit to you that we must delay the roll out of these wireless classrooms as the health concerns continue to mount. There needs to be designated classrooms at each grade level that have the technology hard wired for parents that choose NOT to subject their children to these emissions coming from the routers and the devices. The convenience is simply not worth the risk to our children. Are you willing to take that chance? I believe we simply cannot afford to especially when it is totally unnecessary. We have fiber optic connectivity right to the classroom walls. Why does it have to stop there?
Our good friends over at http://www.wifiinschools.com/ shared the following link to a story of a remarkable group of 9th graders in Denmark, with no formal medical training, who with about 5 bucks produced a priceless experiment:
Parents, look for yourselves and get a load of what two WiFi routers do to a bunch of poor little innocent seeds that were simply sitting too close to a pair of friendly WiFi routers. Poor things-they were just trying to grow up and make it in life. What is all of this 21st Century learning nonsense gonna do to all of yours? So which children will be getting the best seat in the house closest to the Cisco Aironet enterprise class WiFi routers in Fullerton’s new wireless classrooms that stay on all day long and have perfect attendance 180 days a year? Hey gang, I am just the messenger and yes this experiment was peer reviewed- by the whole 9th grade class.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE: http://www.wifiinschools.com/ IS A TREMENDOUS RESOURCE FOR PARENTS, EDUCATORS AND STUDENTS WHO HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SAFETY OF THE NEW PROPOSED CLASSROOM APPLICATIONS OF THIS TECHNOLOGY. IT HAS A WIDE ARRAY OF INFORMATIVE VIDEOS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE DANGERS OF WIFI IN SCHOOLS.
PLEASE VISIT
#1 by R.D. on May 23, 2013 - 12:33 pm
When it comes to children, safety should be priority one. Waiting for thousands of children to be damaged, before taking action is criminal.
#2 by Joe Imbriano on May 23, 2013 - 12:48 pm
According to the FSD, their experts have determined that the emissions are legal in the classrooms. I do not doubt that they are legal in spite of the fact that I have been notified in writing they will not give me permission to film and record EMF measurements in my children’s classrooms. The contention of many outside experts in the field is that the EMF levels far below the FCC guidelines are not safe. There are ample links on this blog to expert testimony and scientific studies that support that position. That is my sincerely held belief as well. While what the FSD is doing is probably perfectly legal in terms of the FCC guidelines, I still believe that it doesn’t equate to what they are doing being truly safe for the children or being right. I personally don’t feel like waiting 10 years for the potential damage to show up. I believe that there is ample scientific evidence that low EMF levels, such as classroom exposure levels, that has shown potential risks and harmful effects to children. Apparently they (the FSD) are willing to take that chance, and as one Orange County Superintendent stated after being presented with the information on this blog, “we support WiFi”.
#3 by Anonymous on May 23, 2013 - 2:10 pm
Let me get this straight, they won’t give you permission to go in and take measurements and they expect you to believe what they are telling you?
#4 by Anonymous on May 23, 2013 - 2:26 pm
Why are your kids even at that school?
#5 by Anonymous on May 23, 2013 - 7:26 pm
They are there for the same reason everyone else’s are: to get an education and for it to be given in a safe manner.
The compelling arguments set forth here on this web site are no joke. This is a very serious matter for all parents. My daughter will be in 5th grade next year at Acacia and I will be watching this very closely. This does not bode well for the children. Why can’t they use wiring? Didn’t they say at the tech night assembly that fiber optics are at Acacia? I don’t understand. Why are they using Ipads instead of laptops?