WHAT A MESS! WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS?
It has been 30 days since I sent a mass email regarding the potential health hazards of wireless classrooms posed to students and staff to every administrative office in the entire district. It has also been over 30 days since I personally addressed and handed the Board of Trustees the information contained on this web site. As of this writing, I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ONE SINGLE EMAIL OR PHONE CALL FROM ANYONE FROM INSIDE THE FSD, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF CHRIS THOMPSON, WHO BY THE WAY DOES NOT AGREE WITH ME on this issue, specifically addressing the safety concerns set forth here on this blog since this blog was launched. Astonishingly, not even my own children’s teachers have reached out to me. In the meantime, the district simply plows ahead to place these high frequency microwave transmitters in every child’s lap connected to a high powered WiFi network in every classroom. In the meantime, the usual insiders continue to vie with each other for photo ops while taking their wireless classroom dog and pony show on the road to the unsuspecting public.
In addition, there have been MULTIPLE written attempts to gain WRITTEN PERMISSION TO access to my children’s schools to take and film EMF measurements so they can be made available to the public. On May 16, 2013 that request for permission to enter, film and record EMF measurements in my children’s classrooms was OFFICIALLY DENIED IN WRITING BY THE F.S.D. SUPERINTENDENT DR. PLETKA.
I even faxed a signed WiFi non-consent form over to the junior high my son attends, and at first, and I confirmed this, that it ended up in the circular file. After a second attempt via email, it’s receipt was confirmed but now the principal will not answer my questions. She now defers me to the technology director, the same guy, who for months, has been ignoring my requests for EMF readings.
So what gives? What on earth is going on inside the FSD. Have you ever dealt with the administration on a tough issue and felt like they truly care? Sure, they give you that sweet smile, and with that soft NPR voice, tell you that they will look into it. I have it on good authority that a few articles are not going to sway the top brass either way on this issue. So there it is folks.
I never took the silent treatment and playing hard to get personally, even growing up. It always made me try harder. It worked on my wife. At first it seemed to indicate to me that the silent party simply wanted nothing to do with you, what you are selling, what you stand for, or in this case what you want them to know and look into. Playing games along those lines is all well and good on a personal level. In this case, however, it is problematic because they work for us and are entrusted with the care of our children while in their custody 160 days a year. How can they so brazenly ignore expert testimony of those on this issue, whose degrees don’t even register on the district’s thermometers, that has been so clearly set forth in their laps? Ironically, the battle clearly rages on with our neighbors to the north in the LAUSD with regard to this very issue. It is no secret that the UTLA, the teachers union up there, wants no part of this forced irradiation program either. Our own teachers union in town, well………
In my opinion, THE PUBLIC TRUST AND THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT are on the road to becoming mutually exclusive terms in the local vernacular.
The health of 15,000 children is potentially on the line and they don’t even give us the time of day. What else would you expect in a school district whose motto is “learning for a lifetime”. Quite possibly, it could very well be that they know it will take them that long to figure out that what they are doing could be so egregiously wrong. Stay tuned.
#1 by ru pregnant? on April 26, 2013 - 2:20 pm
FSD teachers that are pregnant, your UNION could intervene on your behalf. They would take very seriously the recommendations from all of these neuroscientists and medical doctors to get rid of the WiFi.
#2 by rucrazy on April 26, 2013 - 3:12 pm
The union only intervenes when a pay cut needs to be replaced with a furlough day.
You see, the pay cut is much harder to get reversed than a furlough day.