An 87 year old grandmother asked if this is Nazi Germany at Acacia Elementary School in Fullerton California as the school called the cops on her and other law abiding moms passing out fliers
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: joe imbriano <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:07 PM
Subject: The public sidewalk, free speech and our children’s health.
To: Karen Whisnant <karen_whisnant@fullertonsd.org>
Cc: Robert Pletka <bob_pletka@fullertonsd.org>, Chris Thompson <cstfullerton@gmail.com>, council@cityoffullerton.com, dhughes@fullertonpd.org, “Rep. Ed Royce” <CA39ERima@mail.house.gov>, Davis Barber <davis@fullertonstories.com>, observernews@earthlink.net, Beverly Berryman <bev_berryman@att.net>, lynn thornley <lynn_thornley@fullertonsd.org>, Hilda Sugarman <hilda_sugarman@fullertonsd.org>, janny meyer <janny_meyer@fullertonsd.org>, “GGIOKARIS@fjuhsd.net” <GGIOKARIS@fjuhsd.net>, Mar Buc <JWILLIAMS@fjuhsd.net>, david morrison <wirelesswatch@yahoo.com>, “Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org” <Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org>, “PTA@theacaciapartnership.org” <PTA@theacaciapartnership.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:07 PM
Subject: The public sidewalk, free speech and our children’s health.
To: Karen Whisnant <karen_whisnant@fullertonsd.org>
Cc: Robert Pletka <bob_pletka@fullertonsd.org>, Chris Thompson <cstfullerton@gmail.com>, council@cityoffullerton.com, dhughes@fullertonpd.org, “Rep. Ed Royce” <CA39ERima@mail.house.gov>, Davis Barber <davis@fullertonstories.com>, observernews@earthlink.net, Beverly Berryman <bev_berryman@att.net>, lynn thornley <lynn_thornley@fullertonsd.org>, Hilda Sugarman <hilda_sugarman@fullertonsd.org>, janny meyer <janny_meyer@fullertonsd.org>, “GGIOKARIS@fjuhsd.net” <GGIOKARIS@fjuhsd.net>, Mar Buc <JWILLIAMS@fjuhsd.net>, david morrison <wirelesswatch@yahoo.com>, “Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org” <Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org>, “PTA@theacaciapartnership.org” <PTA@theacaciapartnership.org>
Dear Dr. Whisnant,
This morning a peaceful, well rehearsed, information dissemination campaign which consisted of flyers being politely handed to parents was conducted from four strategic locations located on the public sidewalks adjoining Acacia elementary. It was also all filmed as well.
During the course of their peaceful activities, you rudely shouted at a parent from at least 15 feet away that “you can’t be on school property and you can’t obstruct traffic”. Were you trying to intimidate or humiliate this mother? The implication of your rant was that she was on school property and she was obstructing traffic. The fact of the matter is they were doing no such thing. This is a parent with her 87 year old old mother who have lived in the community for well over 40 years and are neighbors. They were handing out fliers on public property. They were clearly on the sidewalk. Review the geography of your facility. They did no such thing.
You accused them of obstructing traffic. Impossible, as the whole thing is on camera and they were in no way, shape or form doing any such thing remotely resembling what you alleged.
Why are you, or your staff so active in trying to get these parents out of the way?
Someone from your office called the police on these parents, including my lovely wife for doing what is perfectly legal, and protected by the first amendment. Review your civics textbook. This was a waste of public resources, tax money and threatens the safety of the community by needlessly tying up 2 officers and 2 patrol cars by having them dispatched to a nonevent.
I am at a loss for words on what lengths Acacia elementary, you or your staff will go to in order to suppress important health information to the parents.
The attached flyer below is what was and will continue to be disseminated at Acacia and all over the FSD.
Is this the truth that you and the FSD appears to want suppressed?
This material is not obscene and pertains to a matter of public safety, relevant to the the intended audience: the Acacia elementary parents. The dissemination of such was done in a manner wholly consistent with and enshrined within the first amendment.
It appears that there is an agenda to infringe on our first amendment rights. It also appears that you are continuing to attempt to keep this very important information pertaining to the welfare of the children out of the hands of the parents, which by the way, you are entrusted with as a principal.
You do respect the first amendment and the rights afforded all Americans do you not, Dr.Whisnant?
We are well aware of our rights, and will continue to peacefully exercise them as this issue should be and will remain at the forefront off all honest discussion in the FSD,
Chief Hughes, I would like to add that your officers were very professional and courteous and I thank you for that.
Regards,
Joe Imbriano
site admin
#1 by Anonymous on February 1, 2014 - 5:09 am
the wireless facts on your site and your efforts are commendable; however, the eugenic theory to me is speculation, and off the rails of the mission at hand re: wireless emissions and the hard-wiring of microwave technology.
*if population control was the motivation of the wireless roll-out, they would not be nuking their own gonads and they are.*
yes there are those who wish population control, that is no secret, but to suggest they are purposely harming themselves and their own pedigree is unsubstantiated and defies logic. now if wireless were only rolled out in populations where they did not live and work, it may be more plausible, but that is not the case. tech tycoons cannot escape wireless emissions (e.g. haarp), seemingly don’t try, and many are among the most prolific wireless users.
a top-down agenda? plausible. industry wants the fortune and the government of the day wants the fame and the two steamroll over all objection. how can they ignore negative health studies? won’t see it in my lifetime, I’m not a doctor, I’m not a scientist, head in the sand, I’ve got to trust the health authorities, if it was bad it would be banned, etc. this to me is more plausible, but still speculation.
I found your site some time ago searching for wireless facts and have been very interested in the content, until the shift to speculation of eugenic motivation and now just skim for wireless facts and updates on your efforts to hard-wire technology. if I were a new visitor searching for wireless facts and landed on this discussion, I very likely would leave as I would be looking for wireless facts, not what I see as radical overviews. perhaps a separate site or section for motive speculation? of course it is your site and your call. I think it detracts from the issue… I may be alone in those sentiments or as you say unable to swallow the pill, but I don’t think so.
please know, Joe, I say this with all due respect, as I support your efforts to hard-wire technology and implement the precautionary principle. I commend your efforts in presenting wireless facts which to me is a valuable public service. I don’t agree which schulzee and his fans who suggest that presenting peer-reviewed science is fear-mongering. I think you are intelligent, articulate and find your autism theory re: emf/metal very interesting as well as based in science and fact.
regardless of motive, we are agreed that the wireless roll-out should be reversed until industry can prove the safety of its products. government should not allow exception to this rule. the citizen should not be expected to prove harm.
#2 by Anonymous on February 2, 2014 - 7:19 am
I agree with most of what you say. The “eugenics” turn seems a bit much at first but once you dig into what he is alleging, it is downright frightening. The pill is a tough one alright. Most people are not ready for it. That is the problem. They are not ready for anything that doesn’t fit in their bubble.
The autism article is truly fascinating. I have read it about 15 times and I am still absorbing it. It really makes you think.
What I recommend that you do is think twice about the government. To be honest with you, there is some real darkness in high places. You cannot deny that.