The Fullerton Observer: Preoccupation with the messengers, ignoring the science and two years of forced irradiation of FSD school children.
Re: The Fullerton Observer, Mid May 2015
109 Scientists Call for EMF Protection Against Long-term Health Effects of WiFi
We applaud the recent Fullerton Observer article that brings to light the very recent appeal from 109 scientists worldwide calling on the United Nations, its member states and the World Health Organization to provide leadership in “this emerging public health crisis.” The “health crisis” is exposure to wireless radiation and the known and serious biological effects.
As the Fullerton School District has been bringing wireless devices into the classrooms
for the past two years, the reporting by the Observer is particularly critical and relevant. Additionally and as explained in the article, the Fullerton City Council approved 3 additional cell towers within the past year, indicating the need for sounding the alarm on health harms from wireless radiation.
As I am sure everyone would agree, newspapers carry weight with the reading public, serve to inform us with items that are important, sometimes vital to our community and lives. In order for a newspaper to function in a responsible manner, it is essential that it be truthful, fair and ethical in its reporting. That brings us to elements of the Observer article that greatly strayed from that integrity that I will now correct.
Fullerton Observer quote:
“Regular commenters on the dangers of WiFi have been appearing at the public comment portions of both the Fullerton city council sessions and school board meetings over the past two years. Unfortunately, the demeanor of some commenters at these meetings has caused many to dismiss what they say, and has prevented any reasonable discussion.”
“Regular commenters” would be Joe Imbriano and myself. “Some” commenters conveys more than one and implies that both of our demeanors overrode/negated the messages we were communicating. Accomplished in 3 minutes, my public comments brought forth nothing but the science and messages of PhDs, medical doctors, and researchers that had extensive background in EMF and its effect on human biology. This was material that had been organized and expressed by myself in order to convey in layman’s terms what the researchers were telling us. All of the information on all occasions was presented in a professional tone and in keeping with the seriousness and gravity of the subject. This is all a matter of public record and may be retrieved by anyone that cares to verify it. I never deviated from this.
It begs the question, why the Fullerton Observer writer tried to cast the scientists’ communications as something that would prevent “any reasonable discussion.” What was it about the serious tone of my message that would cause the Observer to disparage my demeanor? After all, isn’t it a very serious situation to have children exposed to wireless radiation from iPads and classroom routers day in and day out? Is the Observer trying to justify the children being exposed to radiation because, in their words, Joe and I presented in such a way as to make it impossible for them to take the messages seriously? Is the Observer attempting to let all of the FSD and Fullerton City Council elected officials off the hook in demeaning/degrading these scientists’ work, as if it is not worthy of their serious consideration?
Fullerton Observer quote:
“Numerous email blast follow-ups from one commenter to officials and newspapers with information links that did not pan out, also did not help anyone listen.”
Indeed, the Observer was carbon copied on emails as I felt that they should know of the science and findings of wireless. I very much wanted the paper to write articles on this subject. Most, if not every one of the emails to officials, provided citations to source documents, studies, and media including videos. Yes, these were follow-ups, as I did not expect elected officials to just take my word for the information presented in public comments. On every occasion, I followed up with the citation sources.
I do not understand the statement “information links that did not pan out.” As the Observer editor was supplied with information we were capable of obtaining, it should be noted that any information that did not originate from the U.S. did not hold much weight with her. Many people, including the Observer editor, are both naïve and chauvinistic, perhaps, to think that the U.S. produces the most up-to-date and cutting edge research, especially in the EMF realm. Unable to accept, acknowledge research from outside our country, the editor appeared to discard or view irrelevant, not worthy, the current studies and findings originating from other countries.
In the case of RF-radiation studies, the U.S. gets minimal funding, if that, and as a consequence is not doing significant research. It is as simple as that. If there are studies in the U.S., they are industry funded, corrupted to produce results to favor the tech industry. The U.S. research, when it is funded, is designed not to find the truth about EMF. That is why the Hardell study that determined cell phone radiation causes cancer was from Sweden and that is why the recent study that demonstrated cancer cell growth with exposure to 3G radiation was from Germany.
If one is only to be satisfied by U.S. research findings then she may very well view the information as not “panning out.” That, however, does not change the fact that the science is what the science is, regardless of its country of origin. How unfortunate that she did not take this science, publish the findings in her paper, and use it for ethical reporting on such a significant and vital topic: the health and wellbeing of the Fullerton children.
Fullerton Observer quote:
“There are legitimate sources advocating caution about the location of wireless devices.”
The inference here is that the many, many citations from researches across the globe did not qualify as “legitimate” in the estimation of the Observer. That is an absolutely astounding and hugely arrogant assertion. It speaks for itself.
I will note here that we have been doing this for over two years. Initially, I thought that the Observer would treat this subject fairly and give it a decent airing in the Fullerton newspaper. After the Observer treatment and portrayal of two men, falsely accused after a cell tower vote at the Fullerton city council meeting, it became apparent that the paper was not interested in reporting the truth. It has been several months since I have included the Observer in any of my emails. You may read about that here: https://thefullertoninformer.com/sharon-kennedy-and-the-fullerton-observer/
The two Observer reporters assigned to the schools district meetings reduced the science and news I presented to my “concerns.” It was about 3 months ago that I began prefacing my comments with a statement of liability for any reporters that mischaracterized my remarks as anything less than substantive. This was effective in getting the Observer to stop the false reporting. It was better that the public not learn anything than have the information reduced to my “concerns.” I understood that one of the reporters actually was laughing at the science. The children’s health and future is on the line and the Observer reporter finds this humorous? Why did they not report the many significant findings on health or the actions, such as in France where they have enacted a law that is banning WiFi in environments for age 3 and under?
Great care and a tremendous amount of dedication in preparing and presenting the information to elected officials in Fullerton has been given. As so much is at stake here with the children’s health, nothing less was acceptable. Many times, especially after voting for a new cell tower the same quote comes to mind: “casting pearls before swine.” The elected officials have no appreciation of the science, and are either incapable of understanding health consequence or choose to ignore it, resulting in radiation exposure to those living around it.
A lot of responsibility is in our hands, the population is largely ignorant on the radiation health harms, and we cannot afford to do anything but our very best. I think that I can speak for both of us, neither Joe nor myself care what people think of us, we are here to communicate what the scientists are saying. Joe is going to continue to share and warn the public in his own unique way. We will continue to make the now rapidly increasing information and news available.
In reading the article, one might come to the conclusion that both Joe and I, over a two year period, presented illegitimate material that “prevented any reasonable discussion” and, therefore, were responsible for the officials not taking appropriate action. This can be viewed as nothing but a mischaracterization that is easily refuted in the public record of the meetings as well as the follow up correspondence providing the citations and source documents. The information stands on its own, despite the gross misrepresentation as reported by the Observer. One would have to question the motivations of the editor in doing this. One might also wonder if the Observer served to delay the information, preoccupied with the messengers rather than the message.
As there are thousands of studies that have accumulated over the decades, countless websites, Facebook groups and pages, books and films dedicated to documenting and conveying the harms from RF-radiation, neither Joe nor myself had a lock on the information. It was always in the public domain. The Fullerton Observer was free to research this material on its own and they, apparently, disliked our demeanor and the science to the extent that it precluded them from reporting on this “emerging public health crisis.” It’s too bad that they waited these two years, while the FSD students were being irradiated in school, to wait for this one piece of information that they deemed worthy of reporting.
Nevertheless, the issue is and always was about getting the truth about wireless radiation out there, especially where the children are concerned. For that reason, we are happy that the Observer is finally responding. I hope the Observer article is the catalyst for the immediate removal of WiFi from the schools in Fullerton.
For a newspaper, ethics is everything and truth in reporting essential. Nothing less will do.D.H.
#1 by Electromagnetic Warfare on June 10, 2015 - 12:33 pm
EMF’s in the classroom and at war (mind control, terrorizing)
http://www.webalice.it/odnvalen/Hypnotic.pdf
Journal
Table of Contents Hypnotics
· Trance Mind trancing – “Brain Driver”
US Patent 3,678,337 Environmental Control Apparatus
US Patent 4,335,710 Device for the induction of specific brain wave patterns
US Patent 6,219,657 Device and method for creation of emotions
US Patent 6,238,333 Remote magnetic manipulation of nervous systems
US Patent 6,536,440 Method and system for generating sensory data onto the human neural cortex
US Patent 6,587,729 Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect US Patent 6,889,085 Method and system for forming an acoustic signal from neural timing difference data
Composite Strategy
· Natural & Sub Natural Strategy: we communicate
A.I.R. – Automatic Instinctive Rapport: Mastering Strategic Communication A.P.C. – Acoustic Psycho-Correction – Reports and Articles
1951, The Perception of Speech. By J.C.R. LICKLIDER and G.A. MILLER Colors of Noise
2017: House Select Committee on Assassinations
Directory of Threads on Information Theory, Artificial Intelligence and the Internet
· Communications Strategy by Charles A. Sherwood · Composite A
· Composite B
· Composite C
11
Human Auditory System Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy – byAllan H. Frey
United States Patent 3,773,049 Apparatus for treatment of neuropsychic/somatic diseases with heat, light sound and VHF Electomagnetic Radiation
Human Perception of Illumination with Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy – byAllan H. Frey United States Patent 3951134 Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves
United States Patent 4883067 Method and apparatus for translating the EEG into music to induce and control various psychological and physiological states and to control a musical instrument
United States Patent 5,356,368 Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness United States Patent 5,309,411 – Transducer
United States Patent 5,355,523 Wireless transmission/reception system
United States Patent 5,561,689 Method and apparatus for digital carrier detection in a wireless lan United States Patent 4,343,301 Subcutaneous neural stimulation or local tissue destruction
Light and Sound stimulation – Brain Wave Research
Scientific method
“A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior” in Language”, by Noam Chomsky 35, No. 1 (1959), 26-58.
Learning theory (education)
Space-time theories of consciousness
American Mind Control in Baghdad – by Joe Vialls, 29 May 2003
Cahra -“Psychotronic War and the Security of Russia”by V.N Lopatin and V.D. Tsygankov Moscow, 1999 by Cheryl Welsh Ernest Glen Wever (1902-1991)
Georg von Bekesy (1899-1972)
“The Rediscovery of Audio-Visual Entrainment” by Dave Siever, 1997
History of Harvard’s Lower Level
Ambiguous Words by George A. Miller
Isochronous burst transmission
Jan Evangelista Purkinje
Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier
Purkinje effect
Sturm-Liouville theory
Johnniac
Reverberation
United States Frequency Allocations-Radio Spectrum
RAND Contributions to the Development of Computing by Willis H. Ware
12
ADVENTURES in CYBERSOUND – A Chronology of Vision Research 1600-1960
Synchronous Period-Doubling in Flicker Vision of Salamander and Man: Crevier and Meister, Harvard University
The Nature of Sound
United States Patent 4,632,126 Aguilar December 30, 1986 Biofeedback method and apparatus
United States Patent 4,609,931 Input protection MOS semiconductor device with zener breakdown mechanism -Abstract
The range of gauge fields Hendricus G. Loos – 1965 Published by Elsevier Science B. V.
The r operator. Enabling Querying for Semantic Associations – Budapest, Hungary. Anyanwu, Kemafor and Sheth, Amit (2003) Spin connection in general relativity*1 by Hendricus G. Loos Giannini Scientific Corporation, 1963.
Social Development Theory (L. Vygotsky)
PAVLOV USED A BELL- Commentary on Littman on Pavlov-Bell – Roger K. Thomas – Department of Psychology, U. of Georgia The Nature of Human Conflicts by Luria, A.R
Loud Music Can Cause Lung Collapse – Amy Norton
ADVANCED POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
CONTINUOUS POINTS OF INTEREST
Sneak Pitch “ SP” advertising technique
INDIRECT AND SUBLIMINAL COMMUNICATION
TV’s New Trick: Hidden Commercials – By Wesley S. Griswold
RECOVERED MEMORY THERAPY AND FALSE MEMORY SYNDROME By John Hochman, M.D.
Research Threads in Brainwashing
ESP:
INSPECTOR GENERAL’S REPORT ON ARMY MANUALS
The Survivability of Survivability by S Dietrich, P Y A Ryan – Carnegie Mellon University 6 September 2001
Hurlburt Field Base Library- Special Operations Military History
September 2003 Doctrine for Joint Psychological Operations Joint Publication 3-53
What is hypnotic trance? Does it provide unusual physical or mental capacities? by Todd I. Stark
HIGH PERFORMANCE BIOCOMPUTATION: STUDY LEADER – Dan Meiron
PROCTER & GAMBLE – links with the US eugenics movement
Toward a Psycho-Civilized Society
ROCKFELLER AND MASS MURDER by Anton Chaitkin
Mind Control: The Current Situation
Office of Policy Coordination
United States Patent 6,506,148 Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors
MIND CONTROL TECHNIQUES AND TACTICS By Glenn Krawczyk
United States Patent 5,450,859 Protection of living systems from adverse effects of electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields TACTICAL INFRASOUND Study Leader: Christopher Stubbs
13
Appendix
Recommended reading list of additional patents, threads and leads to check out…
US1749090 US2227902 US2304095 US2409033 US2498242 US2703344 US2721316 US2860627 US2902030 US2968302 US3032029 US3060795 US3081376 US3147437 US3182259 US3278676 US3389382 US3393279 US3398810 US3499437 US3557899 US3568347 US3576185 US3612061 US3612211 US3613069 US3628193 US3629521 US3647970 US3712292 US3773049 US3782006 US3848608 US3852519 US3884218 US3967616 US4006291 US4141344 US4227516 US4315501 US4315502 US4349898 US4388918 US4395600 US4572449 US4616261 US4686605 US4692118 US4699153 US4712155 US4717343 US4734037 US4777529 US4821326 US4834701
Apparatus for obtaining criminal confessions
Carrier Frequency Signal System
Method and apparatus for inducing and sustaining sleep
Electro encephalograph device
Control System – Bell Labs – Westinghouse Electric Corporation – John R. Boykin Cutaneous Signaling -1949
Method and Means for Aiding the Blind- 1953
Pattern Photic Stimulator
Alertness indicator
Multibeam Focusing Irradiator (Sound) 1956
System controlling apparatus and method -reduce hum
Apparatus for producing visual stimulation
Subscription Television System – B.D. Loughlin
Single Sideband Radio Carrier Retrieval System
Submodulation Systems for Carrier Re-Creation
Apparatus for producing visual and auditory stimulation
Electron Beam Readout of Stored Information
Nervous System Excitation Device
Ultrasonic Sound Beam
Method and Apparatus for treament of organic structure Security apparatus with audible alarm of enhanced urgency Psycho-Acoustic Projector
Sleep inducing method and arrangement using modulated sound and light Flexible Cutaneous Electrode Matrix 1969
Method of producing locally occurring infrasound
Sonar System
Tactile Image Projection System 1969
Hearing Systems
Method and system for simplifying speech wave forms-Neurophone
Method and apparatus for producing swept FM Audio signal patterns for inducing sleep
Apparatus for treatment of neuropsychic & somatic diseases with heat light sound & VHF electromagnetic radiation Means & methods to assist people in building up aversion to undesirable habits
Subject Integument Spatial Stimulator- July 1973
Video and Audio encoding-decoding system employing
Method of inducing and maintaining various stages of sleep in the human being
Multi channel system for & multi factorial method of controlling the nervous system of a living organism Three dimensional television system
Sound Recording System
Apparatus for Electro-Physiological Stimulation
Learning Relaxation Device
Frequency Stimulation Device
Sonic Weapon System
Mental Harmonization Process
Auditory subliminal message system and method
Method for Stimulating the falling asleep and/or relaxing behavior in a person
Method and apparatus for generating subliminal visual messages
Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere Video Subconscious Display Attachment
System for accessing verbal psycho-biological conditions of a subject
Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma
Method of changing a person’s behavior
Message Screen (Subliminal)
Auditory subliminal programming system
Non-Audible Speech Generation Method & Apparatus
Apparatus for inducing frequency reduction in brain wave