The FCC allows for 100 MILLION more times the microwave exposure than The Austrian Medical Association recommends.


RF Radiation Regulations

It is truly a tale of two cities. Yes indeed folks, yes indeed and oceans apart. The Fullerton School District’s Board of Trustees, administrators, principals, teachers, staff and even most of the PTA groups and Foundations are all aware of what we are attempting to stop which is what we believe to be the extremely dangerous forced irradiation of our school children with pulse modulated high frequency microwave emissions to run these totally unnecessary wireless classrooms. My son, who is not using a microwave transmitter at this time as participation is OPTIONAL if you were not aware, tells me it seems like game day every day. All this just so the kids can play games on their Ipads? He finishes with pencil and paper far ahead of his classmates on problems and assignments. He said the other kids get to play games on their Ipads often and everyday. That is certainly what is going on at the Morningside afterschool day care since WiFi was installed recently as well at the behest of the parents ostensibly so the children can do their homework on the Ipads. Ask the staff. It is game day everyday over there now thanks to Mr. Pletka. His agenda has spilled over into the infant care centers now.

Well there was a time when my wife and I would walk in to the day care facility and see all the kids at the tables with their pencils in hand and their noses in their books doing their homework. Well at least the director has partially followed my advice by shutting off the WiFi until the kids get there in the afternoon sparing the infants, preschoolers and the kindergarten late birds the needless and dangerous RF exposure. Oh I forgot, it is all about the common core. You know even as of today, 6 months into this thing, still not one single solitary servile FSD employee has had the courage or decency to break rank and stand up for these kids. It is amazing what a paltry paycheck and a few bucks will do to peoples’ consciences. Ignoring thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies that show harmful effects and sicking an unqualified attack dog on us to obfuscate the issue is not what the children deserve.

So what gives with the folks across the Atlantic deeming 100 MILLION times less microwave radiation exposure as being the upper limit on safe exposure? What do they know that we don’t? Why are their Autism rates one third of the US? How could there be a 100,000,000 variation? THAT IS TOTALLY INSANE.

It can only amount to one of several possibilities. The first is that they know something that we don’t. It is also possible that our government knows something that they know but don’t want us to know, or lastly no one knows anything and they pulled the 10 to 8th power odds off of the back of a powerball ticket. Somewhere in the middle is the Bio Initiative report that the wireless industry and the academia bobble heads pick apart with their RF industry sharpened Pinocchio schnozes. Those folks are a bit more liberal than those from that far land across the sea at the center of culture and wealth at a recommendation of 30,000 times less exposure. Who are these folks? They are scientists. Who are folks at the Austrian Medical Association? They are doctors who happen to live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Who are the folks at the FCC? Well it is simply a regulatory agency. It is not a public health agency. They don’t have one single medical doctor on its entire payroll. So what do they give us? They give us EXPOSURE GUIDELINES 100 million times higher than the Austrians and to add insult to injury, they get themselves off the hook because the guidelines are NOT SAFETY STANDARDS.

How can something so important, be given to chance? How do we have people with Ed.D’s who demand to be called docktahs, people with MBA’s, and risk managers looking the other way while these disparities are glaring them in the face with me at the microphone every two weeks and me passing out fliers in the parking lots every chance they provide me a captive audience making crucial health decisions for 15,000 school children. These folks have appeared to demonstrate that they themselves don’t even understand these numbers by allowing the THE FSD’s RF report and press release to stand with what I believe to be preposterous readings and false and misleading statements of total safety. They just follow orders. If it is legal and the order comes down, they simply flip the switch. We are not getting what we pay for but we are certainly getting what we deserve if no one dares to speak up for these kids.

I firmly believe that these wildly varying numbers clearly show that the meaning of the FSD’s very own superintendent Robert Pletka’s claim that this is “totally safe for the children” is merely based on what I believe to be his extremely limited understanding of the issue, and a mere subjective interpretation of the facts. Ladies and gentlemen, that is simply a chance that none of us should be willing to take with our most valuable assets who happen to be our own children.

  1. #1 by Schulzeeepoo on September 14, 2013 - 8:09 pm

    Anybody have a link to the Austrian Medical Assoc. paper I’m having trouble finding the complete report. I know they cite the BioInitiative report but I want to see the whole report before dismissing it as crap out of hand. Thanks.

    • #2 by Ray on September 15, 2013 - 8:29 am

      The Austrian Medical Association Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of EMF related health problems and illnesses (EMF-syndrome)

      http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/austrian-emf-guidelines-20121.pdf

    • #3 by amateur night on September 15, 2013 - 10:45 pm

      Don’t feed this cat. Schulzeepoo is a vegetarian. He doesn’t like the crust and he won’t eat the skin.

    • #4 by Joe Imbriano on September 16, 2013 - 11:55 am

      The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), a non-profit professional
      organization of 60,000 primary care pediatricians, pediatric medical subspecialists, and pediatric surgical specialists dedicated to the health, safety and
      well-being of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults disagree with your assertions R.

    • #5 by Schulze on September 18, 2013 - 2:56 pm

      Not my assertions Joe, I’m nearly presenting data and information. My assertions or opinions matter and mean as much as yours in this debate, that is not at all.

    • #6 by Joe Imbriano on September 18, 2013 - 3:52 pm

      These are your assertions and the information you put forth is at odds with this group of crackpots called the AAP and many others like them. We could go on for years citing studies on both sides which I am grateful for you having done. The traffic is really up here lately.

      Roman, look the fact is that there are thousands of studies that show harm, and there are thousands that show no harm. So you, the FSD, the FJUHSD and their respective staffs choose to willfully ignore the thousands of studies that show harm and to roll the dice with the boys stacked on the pass line and the girls placed on the big 6.

      That is what is happening all so that the kids can play with their toys, everyone feels good about helping the kids, the school gets the accolades and the common core curriculum implementation via this technology can begin to put the algorithms together more efficiently on every last one of the children and their families.

      This is the twighlight zone indeed. When I look into the eyes of the staff, board members, and parents that are involved in this debate, I see fear, I see worry, I see shame. Everyone knows this stuff can’t be good. Few have the courage to stand up against it. It is easier to delve into the bottle or some other escape than to face this head on.

      You cite references to apples and oranges, radio waves , sunlight and the like. The inverted bell curve of the spectrum plotted against background levels speaks for itself. The trillion dollar Rf industry is bigger than your big pharma high priest order.

      Like I have said in prior posts, some of the most foolish people that I have ever known were the most educated.
      My assertions are equally important in this debate because I am alleging that this technology is directly responsible for the Autism epidemic and is affecting human fertility specifically the eggs in the young girls.

      You see Roman, you are banking on the fact that I am wrong, the stack of scientists on our side of the aisle are wrong and hoping your kids won’t be affected. That takes more faith than you give yourself credit for having.

      I am here to tell you that this thing is designed to be inescapable unless we stand up and stop it. Break your conditioning. Open your eyes. If you choose not to, because of your dedication to people that in reality could care less about you, your family and your children, then that is even more foolish than your mocking the man in the sky position which you cling to so tightly in the midst of His trying so desperately to get your attention by sparring with one such as I Roman.

      Will you be at the next school board meeting?

    • #7 by Schulze on September 18, 2013 - 4:27 pm

      Ok, that was step one, you recognize that there are thousands of studies that show no harm. The problem I really had was that not one of those studies found its way onto your site until I got here. And I’m sorry but I get hyper-skeptical when anyone only quotes evidence that happens to only support their side… that’s an industry move and quite irresponsible. I am not pro EMF at all, I am against bias and misinformation. I’m not saying you’re spreading misinformation but by not mentioning any evidence that contradicts your opinion, you are being deceitful.

      In my experience, people who hide evidence do so because they fear it. Which makes me dig even harder and deeper.

      That’s what happened here and earned me the reputation as “attack dog” ( Though I would have used “lap dog”, it’s more demeaning).

      So, put an easy to find link to EMF&Health on your front page and we can be done. You can then editorialize on each and every one of their points as much as you want but hiding it only makes it more powerful.

      I will look at my availability for the next board meeting, should be no problem.

1 4 5 6 7 8 30
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!