It is truly a tale of two cities. Yes indeed folks, yes indeed and oceans apart. The Fullerton School District’s Board of Trustees, administrators, principals, teachers, staff and even most of the PTA groups and Foundations are all aware of what we are attempting to stop which is what we believe to be the extremely dangerous forced irradiation of our school children with pulse modulated high frequency microwave emissions to run these totally unnecessary wireless classrooms. My son, who is not using a microwave transmitter at this time as participation is OPTIONAL if you were not aware, tells me it seems like game day every day. All this just so the kids can play games on their Ipads? He finishes with pencil and paper far ahead of his classmates on problems and assignments. He said the other kids get to play games on their Ipads often and everyday. That is certainly what is going on at the Morningside afterschool day care since WiFi was installed recently as well at the behest of the parents ostensibly so the children can do their homework on the Ipads. Ask the staff. It is game day everyday over there now thanks to Mr. Pletka. His agenda has spilled over into the infant care centers now.
Well there was a time when my wife and I would walk in to the day care facility and see all the kids at the tables with their pencils in hand and their noses in their books doing their homework. Well at least the director has partially followed my advice by shutting off the WiFi until the kids get there in the afternoon sparing the infants, preschoolers and the kindergarten late birds the needless and dangerous RF exposure. Oh I forgot, it is all about the common core. You know even as of today, 6 months into this thing, still not one single solitary servile FSD employee has had the courage or decency to break rank and stand up for these kids. It is amazing what a paltry paycheck and a few bucks will do to peoples’ consciences. Ignoring thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies that show harmful effects and sicking an unqualified attack dog on us to obfuscate the issue is not what the children deserve.
So what gives with the folks across the Atlantic deeming 100 MILLION times less microwave radiation exposure as being the upper limit on safe exposure? What do they know that we don’t? Why are their Autism rates one third of the US? How could there be a 100,000,000 variation? THAT IS TOTALLY INSANE.
It can only amount to one of several possibilities. The first is that they know something that we don’t. It is also possible that our government knows something that they know but don’t want us to know, or lastly no one knows anything and they pulled the 10 to 8th power odds off of the back of a powerball ticket. Somewhere in the middle is the Bio Initiative report that the wireless industry and the academia bobble heads pick apart with their RF industry sharpened Pinocchio schnozes. Those folks are a bit more liberal than those from that far land across the sea at the center of culture and wealth at a recommendation of 30,000 times less exposure. Who are these folks? They are scientists. Who are folks at the Austrian Medical Association? They are doctors who happen to live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Who are the folks at the FCC? Well it is simply a regulatory agency. It is not a public health agency. They don’t have one single medical doctor on its entire payroll. So what do they give us? They give us EXPOSURE GUIDELINES 100 million times higher than the Austrians and to add insult to injury, they get themselves off the hook because the guidelines are NOT SAFETY STANDARDS.
How can something so important, be given to chance? How do we have people with Ed.D’s who demand to be called docktahs, people with MBA’s, and risk managers looking the other way while these disparities are glaring them in the face with me at the microphone every two weeks and me passing out fliers in the parking lots every chance they provide me a captive audience making crucial health decisions for 15,000 school children. These folks have appeared to demonstrate that they themselves don’t even understand these numbers by allowing the THE FSD’s RF report and press release to stand with what I believe to be preposterous readings and false and misleading statements of total safety. They just follow orders. If it is legal and the order comes down, they simply flip the switch. We are not getting what we pay for but we are certainly getting what we deserve if no one dares to speak up for these kids.
I firmly believe that these wildly varying numbers clearly show that the meaning of the FSD’s very own superintendent Robert Pletka’s claim that this is “totally safe for the children” is merely based on what I believe to be his extremely limited understanding of the issue, and a mere subjective interpretation of the facts. Ladies and gentlemen, that is simply a chance that none of us should be willing to take with our most valuable assets who happen to be our own children.
#1 by Ray on September 17, 2013 - 5:36 am
Schulze, this is another fine example of your lack of integrity.
Your argument for the past several weeks has been that individual studies carry little to no weight. That’s how you’ve managed to ignore thousands of peer reviewed research papers reporting biological and health effects.
Your study posted above is but one study that hasn’t reported an effect. Yes, there are studies that do not show effects, but there are also studies that do show effects, such as cancer, tumors, and DNA damage.
What you continue to demonstrate is a blindness to any and all evidence that reports serious health effects. That’s sick – really dark.
On one hand, you will absolutely ignore lists that show study after study reporting adverse effects, and then you will cite one study that didn’t report an effect, and call it done.
You continue to treat this as a game, like you said, a rodeo, thinking that the goal is to ride this animal, as long as possible, no matter what, using whatever tactics you can come up with.
You have stooped to new levels of dishonesty Schulze. Give yourself a big round of applause.
#2 by freudian tools on September 17, 2013 - 6:11 am
He is in good company, a legend in his own mind, and dark-yes very.
#3 by Roman's holiday on September 17, 2013 - 10:20 am
The R’s have it:
R. Craven, R. Pletka and R. Schulze
#4 by Schulze on September 18, 2013 - 3:49 pm
Thanks, I was starting to think I was wasting my breath.
#5 by Schulze on September 18, 2013 - 3:39 pm
I have stooped to your level, I’m not too proud. I maintain that individual studies are not nearly as significant as systematic reviews/expert opinion but I kept getting individual studies thrown at me so I “stoop to a new level” out of courtesy really. If you won’t play by my rules I have 2 choices. I chose to play by yours… should probably have chosen not to play but, eh, wasn’t my first mistake.
I see it like this allegory. Two people are having a duel to the death and one grabs a USP .45. The other says ” I don’t like that gun” and grabs a slingshot. Now you can kill somebody with a sling shot but its going to take a while. Now the first person, having some honor, can either walk away shaking his head or pick up a sling shot and go for it. Slingshots it is.
Now the whole reason I quoted that study was to make a point and it went better than expected. If negative studies can’t disprove positive ones, as I have been repeatedly told, then positive ones can’t disprove negative ones (Neither of which is true but nobody is willing to play by my rules, the rules of scientific research, anyway)
Now you want to guess how many studies I can find showing no effect? Slingshots it is.
#6 by Ray on September 18, 2013 - 5:29 pm
Schulze, your problem is that you see this as some sort of gunplay. It’s not. It’s a public health issue.
#7 by Schulze on September 18, 2013 - 5:47 pm
No, no. I see gun play as actually being dangerous and harmful and needing much stricter regulation. Gunplay is a public health issue in fact, I wish guns we’re as safe as WiFi.
My gut told me it was not the best allegory but did I listen? I’ll think of another one if you missed the point I was trying to make. My apologies.