It is truly a tale of two cities. Yes indeed folks, yes indeed and oceans apart. The Fullerton School District’s Board of Trustees, administrators, principals, teachers, staff and even most of the PTA groups and Foundations are all aware of what we are attempting to stop which is what we believe to be the extremely dangerous forced irradiation of our school children with pulse modulated high frequency microwave emissions to run these totally unnecessary wireless classrooms. My son, who is not using a microwave transmitter at this time as participation is OPTIONAL if you were not aware, tells me it seems like game day every day. All this just so the kids can play games on their Ipads? He finishes with pencil and paper far ahead of his classmates on problems and assignments. He said the other kids get to play games on their Ipads often and everyday. That is certainly what is going on at the Morningside afterschool day care since WiFi was installed recently as well at the behest of the parents ostensibly so the children can do their homework on the Ipads. Ask the staff. It is game day everyday over there now thanks to Mr. Pletka. His agenda has spilled over into the infant care centers now.
Well there was a time when my wife and I would walk in to the day care facility and see all the kids at the tables with their pencils in hand and their noses in their books doing their homework. Well at least the director has partially followed my advice by shutting off the WiFi until the kids get there in the afternoon sparing the infants, preschoolers and the kindergarten late birds the needless and dangerous RF exposure. Oh I forgot, it is all about the common core. You know even as of today, 6 months into this thing, still not one single solitary servile FSD employee has had the courage or decency to break rank and stand up for these kids. It is amazing what a paltry paycheck and a few bucks will do to peoples’ consciences. Ignoring thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies that show harmful effects and sicking an unqualified attack dog on us to obfuscate the issue is not what the children deserve.
So what gives with the folks across the Atlantic deeming 100 MILLION times less microwave radiation exposure as being the upper limit on safe exposure? What do they know that we don’t? Why are their Autism rates one third of the US? How could there be a 100,000,000 variation? THAT IS TOTALLY INSANE.
It can only amount to one of several possibilities. The first is that they know something that we don’t. It is also possible that our government knows something that they know but don’t want us to know, or lastly no one knows anything and they pulled the 10 to 8th power odds off of the back of a powerball ticket. Somewhere in the middle is the Bio Initiative report that the wireless industry and the academia bobble heads pick apart with their RF industry sharpened Pinocchio schnozes. Those folks are a bit more liberal than those from that far land across the sea at the center of culture and wealth at a recommendation of 30,000 times less exposure. Who are these folks? They are scientists. Who are folks at the Austrian Medical Association? They are doctors who happen to live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Who are the folks at the FCC? Well it is simply a regulatory agency. It is not a public health agency. They don’t have one single medical doctor on its entire payroll. So what do they give us? They give us EXPOSURE GUIDELINES 100 million times higher than the Austrians and to add insult to injury, they get themselves off the hook because the guidelines are NOT SAFETY STANDARDS.
How can something so important, be given to chance? How do we have people with Ed.D’s who demand to be called docktahs, people with MBA’s, and risk managers looking the other way while these disparities are glaring them in the face with me at the microphone every two weeks and me passing out fliers in the parking lots every chance they provide me a captive audience making crucial health decisions for 15,000 school children. These folks have appeared to demonstrate that they themselves don’t even understand these numbers by allowing the THE FSD’s RF report and press release to stand with what I believe to be preposterous readings and false and misleading statements of total safety. They just follow orders. If it is legal and the order comes down, they simply flip the switch. We are not getting what we pay for but we are certainly getting what we deserve if no one dares to speak up for these kids.
I firmly believe that these wildly varying numbers clearly show that the meaning of the FSD’s very own superintendent Robert Pletka’s claim that this is “totally safe for the children” is merely based on what I believe to be his extremely limited understanding of the issue, and a mere subjective interpretation of the facts. Ladies and gentlemen, that is simply a chance that none of us should be willing to take with our most valuable assets who happen to be our own children.
#1 by a mother on September 13, 2013 - 6:56 am
Mr. Imbriano, am I correct in understanding that we are only being protected from the burning effects by the FCC guidelines? Are you saying that these devices, although they do not emit enough heat to burn, can cause harm?
#2 by Joe Imbriano on September 13, 2013 - 9:01 am
The FCC ignores non heating effects. The scientists clearly warn against non thermal exposures. Please read these letters that were submitted to the LAUSD earlier this year. Their position is the same as ours: hard wire period-no wireless.
http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
#3 by Ray on September 13, 2013 - 1:26 pm
The FCC guidelines are based on outdated science, as it used to be believed that the only effect from RF microwave radiation was heating of bodily tissue.
It is now clear from the scientific evidence that many effects occur at non-thermal levels, which are millions of times lower than what the FCC deems acceptable.
Given that the FCC is the only regulatory agency actively involved, we have no protection from RF radiation emissions.
Our society has never before been exposed to levels even remotely close to these. WiFi emits levels of RF microwave radiation hundreds of millions of times higher than what our parents, grandparents, and all ancestors before them ever experienced.
This is why many scientists consider this to be the greatest health threat of the 21st century.
Most are not aware of this because the media does not report this story. There is a blackout in this country.
#4 by ? on September 13, 2013 - 4:31 pm
Hundreds of millions of times higher? Where do you get that figure from?
#5 by Anonymous on September 13, 2013 - 7:11 pm
If what you are claiming is true, then we most certainly have a pending disaster on our hands. It would make sense as to why the children are not the same as 15, 20 or even 30 years back. They blame the shots. Maybe this is a big part of it. Regardless, something is truly amiss. How can there be no discussion of this issue? There have to be some honest news agencies out there right?
#6 by Robert Craven is leaving FSD on September 15, 2013 - 5:51 am
http://www.cue.org/robertemcraven
He has a technology obsession? Take your obsession somewhere else please.
Hit the road Jack
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rEsVp5tiDQ
#7 by Joe Imbriano on September 15, 2013 - 10:15 am
“Robert is the Director of Technology and Media Services for Fullerton School District. In this role Robert oversees 1:1 Laptop and iPad deployments, professional development training, network infrastructure, repair facilities and much more for a 14,000 students K-8 school district.”
One to one DEPLOYMENT? What are these things?
#8 by militaristic? on September 15, 2013 - 12:13 pm
“deployments”, sounds like iPads and laptops are weapons.
#9 by Joe Imbriano on September 15, 2013 - 4:04 pm
What is under attack? Human fertility? https://thefullertoninformer.com/what-is-wifi-doing-to-your-daughters/
#10 by crack pipe on September 16, 2013 - 12:35 am
You need to put it down slowly Joe
#11 by Joe Imbriano on September 16, 2013 - 8:39 am
The following are 22 shocking population control quotes from the some of the global elite:
#1) The March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief….
“What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?”
#2) Microsoft’s Bill Gates….
“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
#3) Barack Obama’s top science advisor, John P. Holdren….
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
#4) George W. Bush’s science advisor Paul Ehrlich….
“Each person we add now disproportionately impacts on the environment and life-support systems of the planet.”
#5) U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg….
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
#6) A United Nations Population Fund report entitled “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate”….
“No human is genuinely ‘carbon neutral,’ especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation.”
#7) David Rockefeller….
“The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”
#8) Jacques Cousteau….
“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”
#9) CNN Founder Ted Turner….
“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
#10) Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder….
“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”
#11) Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh….
“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”
#12) David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club….
“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
#13) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger….
“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
#14) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12….
“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”
#15) Princeton philosopher Peter Singer….
“So why don’t we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required — we could party our way into extinction!”
#16) Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs….
“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….”
#17) Mikhail Gorbachev….
“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
#18) John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London….
“The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”
#19) Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka….
“This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.”
#20) U.S. Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton….
“This year, the United States renewed funding of reproductive healthcare through the United Nations Population Fund, and more funding is on the way. The U.S. Congress recently appropriated more than $648 million in foreign assistance to family planning and reproductive health programs worldwide. That’s the largest allocation in more than a decade – since we last had a Democratic president, I might add.”
#21) Clinton adviser Nina Fedoroff….
“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”
#22) The first of the “new 10 commandments” on the Georgia Guidestones….
“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature
#12 by Anonymous on September 30, 2013 - 12:15 pm
So whose children are the one’s that don’t get to have kids?