So what happens when you take perfectly good, healthy, practical, well researched, and critical information pertaining to school children’s health safety and run it through her yellowing rag’s disfunctional digestive track of reporters? For years her Observer has been twisting and turning peoples’ comments and accounts of events so they fit into the local establishment agendas. Now it is time to shine the light into the darkness and get some magnesium into the distended bowel of the Observer.
The obscure Sharon Kennedy- publisher of the Fullerton Observer
You know the saying garbage in, garbage out right? Well it just so happens that the opposite is true when it comes to the intentional spin, omission, libel and flat out lies Sharon Kennedy keeps churning out week after week in our hometown. Rumor has it that the circulation is way down and the readership is in the crapper. With the fluff and the yarns she spins, I can see why. It is time to turn it into a crossword puzzle weekly mailer. Just don’t tell the advertisers.
The highest and primary obligation of ethical journalism is to serve the public by being accurate and fair. It should provide context by taking special care not to misrepresent or oversimplify in promoting, previewing or summarizing a story. It should provide access to source material when it is relevant and appropriate.
Journalists should always avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived, avoid political and other outside activities that may compromise integrity or impartiality, or may damage credibility.
Journalists should deny favored treatment to special interests, and resist internal and external pressure to influence coverage.
For the better part of the last year and a half, we, as journalists have been presenting peer reviewed scientific information as well as expert testimony from PHD’s , doctors, scientists, researchers, public health professionals and parents to the local school boards in Fullerton warning against the reckless and unnecessary deployment of wireless systems and devices in Fullerton’s elementary K-8 schools.
As in the past, at the most recent school board meeting for the FSD, Diane Hickey presented information that was crucial in terms of the safety of the students.
Sharon and Jan need the purple pill
because after the festering in the putrifying, deep dark bowels of the confines of the Foolerton Observer, these thousands of studies on EMF repeatedly presented to the the five blind mice at the FSD board and this list of whose who that signed onto this http://doctorsforsaferschools.org/2014.Doctors.for.Safer.Schools.pdf
Stephen Sinatra MD, FACC
American College of Cardiology
Co-founder, Executive Director
Kerry Crofton PhD
Medical Advisor
Brendan Montano MD
Board Members:
Priyanka Bandara PhD
Researcher
John Barnhill MD, FRCS(C)
Royal College of Surgeons
Martin Blank PhD
Scientist, Columbia University
Lee Cowden MD
Cardiologist and Internist
Carolyn Dean MD, ND
Researcher
Victoria Dunckley MD
Integrative Child Psychiatrist
Magda Havas PhD
Professor, Researcher
Dietrich Klinghardt MD, PhD
Clinician
Erica Mallery-Blythe BMBS
UK physician, Medical Advisor ES-UK
Heather McKinney PhD
Researcher and Educator
Hans Scheiner MD
Clinician
Drew Sinatra ND, LAc
Clinician
and their warnings get regurgitated into what Jan Youngman refers to as DIANE HICKEYS CONCERNS.
Here is the quote:
“Ms. Diane Hickey expressed her concerns to the Board about “existing radiation exposure” for students with the use of iPads in schools. She said the district should do more to protect the children.”
When Diane Hickey repeatedly presents information from the Chief of Obstetrics at Yale, a Harvard trained PHD pediatric neurologist, a world leader in integrative cardiology, or a long list of other MDs, PHDs, epidemiologists, researchers, scientists, or public health experts asking for a halt to the deployment and removal of wireless technology in schools, how does anyone with a brain call those “Diane Hickey’s concerns”
What is so despicable about Sharon Kennedy and her minions is how instead of heeding the advice of the experts Diane Hickey has repeatedly presented, Sharon and her staff run cover for the lackey establishment educrats here in town who are endangering the children.
Instead of moving to protect the children The Observer moves to protect the school district. THE THOUSANDS OF STUDIES, SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION AND EXPERT WARNINGS TO HALT SCHOOL WIRELESS DEPLOYMENT CONTINUALLY BEING PRESENTED TO THE BOARD AT THESE MEETINGS IS HIDDEN FROM THE PUBLIC BY INTENTIONAL OMISSION AND MISCHARACTERIZATIONS.
Whats the matter, do you all love your cronies more than the children?
With a front row table at all the board meetings, the Observer consumes vital public information and regurgitates it into undigested CAUSTIC garbage.
Time for the purple pill. Lay off the cheeseburgers ladies will ya?
Not to be outdone, may I introduce the reporter for the FJUHSD meetings, Ms. Vivien Moreno.
After the festering in the putrifying, deep dark bowels of the Foolerton Observer repeatedly over the last 21 months or so, these thousands of studies on EMF , the warnings of:
Stephen Sinatra MD, FACC
American College of Cardiology
Co-founder, Executive Director
Kerry Crofton PhD
Medical Advisor
Brendan Montano MD
Board Members:
Priyanka Bandara PhD
Researcher
John Barnhill MD, FRCS(C)
Royal College of Surgeons
Martin Blank PhD
Scientist, Columbia University
Lee Cowden MD
Cardiologist and Internist
Carolyn Dean MD, ND
Researcher
Victoria Dunckley MD
Integrative Child Psychiatrist
Magda Havas PhD
Professor, Researcher
Dietrich Klinghardt MD, PhD
Clinician
Erica Mallery-Blythe BMBS
UK physician, Medical Advisor ES-UK
Heather McKinney PhD
Researcher and Educator
Hans Scheiner MD
Clinician
Drew Sinatra ND, LAc
Clinician and these experts http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html, presented to the much more cerebral and receptive FJUHSD board, it all gets regurgitated once again into this pile of bile.
Here is the quote:
“Joe Imbriano and Diane Hickey commented on what THEY SEE as the dangers of wireless technology use in the classrooms. “.
When Diane Hickey and myself repeatedly present information from the Chief of Obstetrics at Yale, a Harvard trained PHD pediatric neurologist, the foremost MD in the world in the field of integrative cardiology, or a long list of other MDs, PHDs, epidemiologists, researchers, scientists, or public health experts, how does anyone with a brain call that what ” Diane and Joe see?
This amounts to nothing more than an organized sabotaging of information being brought forward to the public by relegating the information to one or two Fullerton residents “concerns”, effectively suppressing the information.
If many esteemed experts are stating the same thing, it becomes a problem for the establishment bozos to wash away the evidence. Thus the bile pile. Obviously it is a tactic to try to reduce our credibility on the subject. If it is only our opinion it can be much more easily discounted.
Let’s face it folks these are serious concerns. Nothing Sharon deals with in her flimsy paper is as important as this issue as it affects so many people.
Another example of their so called objective reporting was when Ms. Vivien Moreno referred to Michelle Garden (pro wireless parent) as a “parent” when in fact she has no child in the FJUHSD and yet in the same paragraph referred to Barry Levinson as a mere “resident” while going on to prefaced my comments at the board meeting with the statements “Joe Imbriano…. and Barry Levinson….. who arrived during the last 10 minutes of the meeting….”
What Ms. Vivien Moreno conveniently failed to mention was it was the third meeting that we attended on that Tuesday night. The Fullerton City Council, The Fullerton School District Trustee meeting and The Fullerton Joint Union High School District Trustee meeting all took place on THE SAME NIGHT at almost the exact same times. She tries to make us look like Flakey Jakes strolling in at the last minute when in fact we managed to successfully attended and speak at ALL THREE MEETINGS to get the message out on this subject that the Observer won’t print. This is all IN SPITE OF THE FACT that these meeting times are designed to conflict with each other to discourage public participation.
Time for the purple pill ladies
or the dental caries and the milkshakes will get the better of you.
When Diane Hickey tried to provide them (in a followup email) with the sources she was quoting/citing in “public comments”, none of it was used.
I could go on and on about the liability that exists for any mischaracterization of our remarks as matters of “concern” or as anything less than “substantive”.
I could go on about what a joke these people are with their establishment protecting landfill clogger. What I will really go on about is how Sharon Kennedy and her clan are purposely keeping the information hidden from the public about what is really being said by SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS, MDS, PHDS AND RESEARCHERS about what is happening to all the kids in the schools run by the objects of their little protection ring like FSD’s Robert Pletka seen here recently at the White House for jamming wireless and common core down everyone’s throats.
When thousands of studies exist that show wireless is harmful and statements made by highly credentialed experts seeking the ban of wireless in schools are entered into the public record during public comment period at school board meetings which virtually no one attends that ARE NOT VIDEO TAPED FOR THE PUBLIC, that is a major problem. It is incumbent upon the so called “media” who has a table up front to report objectively, especially when it comes to the welfare and safety of our children. Sharon and her purple pill pals DO NO SUCH THING. Instead they ignore, misquote, omit, mischaracterize, and in some cases flat out lie about what goes on in these meetings.
Go ahead and forget about my assertions that this wireless classroom model is actually a sterilization agenda.
In the meantime, we recommend that these progressive lefties running cover for the Foolerton establishment keep tabs on their proton pump inhibitor, H2 antagonist, or aluminum hydroxide dosages or the rot just might well extend past the enamel and spill out into the public and burn them too.
In our next issue, if we bother to address Sharon’s integrity lacking train wreck rag, we will discuss how The Observer carries water for the corrupt FPD as they unsuccessfully tried to frame two innocent men. Stay tuned.
#1 by Trudy on December 7, 2014 - 5:10 pm
Sharon’s paper is a progressive publication that deals with human rights and the environment. Why do you take issue with that? Sounds perfectly fine to me.
#2 by really? Trudy? on December 8, 2014 - 9:12 pm
I guess it depends on whose “human rights” you are talking about. If it is two innocent men that the Observer just wants to go after and destroy, then to hell with their “human rights.”
If it is a politically correct, leftist elite “human right” than that’s okay.