According to Apple’s product information guide, iPads can emit even more radiation than cell phones.http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1524/en_US/iPad_Important_Product_Information_Guide.pdf Also, the scientific literature clearly shows that children absorb more radiation than adults.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999884
According to the scientific evidence itself, in our opinion, it would be reasonable to state that children who use iPads for long periods of time are likely to have a significantly increased risk of developing cancer. Equally worrying is that in my opinion, children may actually suffer severe reproductive harm. So what kind of risk are we talking about? Isn’t that really the question? According to high quality independently funded research by Dr. Lennart Hardell of Sweden:
For every 100 hours of cellphone use, the risk of brain cancer increases by 5%.
So how many hours would children in Fullerton schools be exposed?
175 days x 6 hours = 875 hours per year.
That means after each year of exposure to these wireless devices there would be a 44% increased risk of brain cancer.
After 13 years, this comes to a 572% increased risk of cancer, for adults that is. For children, the increased risk would be much more, as research shows that they have at least double the risk of adults.
So according to these calculations, children would have an 1100% increased risk of brain cancer as a result of using an iPad at school. This does not include time spent doing homework or other extraneous activities. WiFi enabled devices such as tablets and laptops in the classroom possibly emit as much or more high frequency pulse modulated microwave radiation as a cell phone and they are in direct proximity to the children’s sensitive developing reproductive areas.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE LINK BELOW FROM THE LARGEST TRIAL BAR IN THE WORLD AS THEY WEIGH IN ON THE FCC’S RF EXPOSURE GUIDELINES.
13-84 09-03-2013 American Association For Justice 7520942173
FOLKS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR CHILDREN HERE. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR FUTURE. LET’S SHOW THAT WE CARE AND NOT JUST ACT LIKE IT.
#1 by amateur night on September 25, 2013 - 8:45 am
Cell phones and I pads put out. The kids take it in. Cell phones are good for the kids? Schulzeepoo says they prevent brain cancer. What a freak.
#2 by Schulzee on September 25, 2013 - 1:41 pm
If it helps, I did NOT say that. What I said was that there are studies that show a decreased risk of brain cancer. I’m sure someone here can explain to us how that is possible.
#3 by David Morrison on September 25, 2013 - 7:13 pm
The brain cancer statistics are most likely being altered. This is a 4 trillion dollar industry attached to the military and there will be nothing to stand in it’s way. I have it from a source in Britain that they are tampering with the brain cancer statistics. Besides, the stats are a couple of years behind here. Brain cancer used to be rare however how many of you know or have known someone that has had it? Most of you ….
#4 by Schulzee on September 28, 2013 - 3:26 pm
Is the data supporting a correlation also being altered???
#5 by Anonymous on September 25, 2013 - 7:52 pm
Are you the one that works for Apple?
#6 by Conflict of interest? on September 26, 2013 - 11:32 am
No that’s this guy
http://crescerance.com/School/isummit/speakers.html
He is the husband of the principal over at Fisler.
#7 by Pro-irradiation on September 26, 2013 - 8:53 pm
No, he’s the doctor that likes to irradiate our children.
#8 by Ray on September 26, 2013 - 11:47 am
Schulze, you continue to obfuscate the science.
The studies you are referring to actually found a significantly increased risk of cancer if there was greater than 10 year exposure, and there was more than 30 minutes of use per day.
For 60 minutes of use per day, there was a massive increase in brain cancer risk.
What disgusts me is that as medical doctor you ignore this data.
#9 by Anonymous on September 26, 2013 - 5:11 pm
I don’t know who this Schulze guy is but he doesn’t live in the real world. He seems like he has no compassion and that this is all some sort of a game. He is not playing with a full deck.
Ray you are very well spoken, reasonable and articulate. Your perspective is reasonable and one of caution. Parents need what you bring to the table here. Thank you for your research and your efforts. Please continue to shed the proper light on all of this conflicting information and data.
#10 by Joe Imbriano on September 26, 2013 - 10:30 pm
FSD’s very own Robert Pletka mandates 3 -4 hours a day 5 days a week 180 days per year plus extra credit for the countless hours at day care as well as at home. Yes, and he says that it is totally safe for the kids.
#11 by Anonymous on October 1, 2013 - 9:07 pm
Why don’t you ask Bob?
#12 by Anonymous on September 28, 2013 - 8:57 pm
The guy does enjoy irradiating our children.