According to Apple’s product information guide, iPads can emit even more radiation than cell phones.http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1524/en_US/iPad_Important_Product_Information_Guide.pdf Also, the scientific literature clearly shows that children absorb more radiation than adults.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999884
According to the scientific evidence itself, in our opinion, it would be reasonable to state that children who use iPads for long periods of time are likely to have a significantly increased risk of developing cancer. Equally worrying is that in my opinion, children may actually suffer severe reproductive harm. So what kind of risk are we talking about? Isn’t that really the question? According to high quality independently funded research by Dr. Lennart Hardell of Sweden:
For every 100 hours of cellphone use, the risk of brain cancer increases by 5%.
So how many hours would children in Fullerton schools be exposed?
175 days x 6 hours = 875 hours per year.
That means after each year of exposure to these wireless devices there would be a 44% increased risk of brain cancer.
After 13 years, this comes to a 572% increased risk of cancer, for adults that is. For children, the increased risk would be much more, as research shows that they have at least double the risk of adults.
So according to these calculations, children would have an 1100% increased risk of brain cancer as a result of using an iPad at school. This does not include time spent doing homework or other extraneous activities. WiFi enabled devices such as tablets and laptops in the classroom possibly emit as much or more high frequency pulse modulated microwave radiation as a cell phone and they are in direct proximity to the children’s sensitive developing reproductive areas.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE LINK BELOW FROM THE LARGEST TRIAL BAR IN THE WORLD AS THEY WEIGH IN ON THE FCC’S RF EXPOSURE GUIDELINES.
13-84 09-03-2013 American Association For Justice 7520942173
FOLKS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR CHILDREN HERE. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR FUTURE. LET’S SHOW THAT WE CARE AND NOT JUST ACT LIKE IT.
#1 by Talk Back on October 1, 2013 - 2:22 pm
Talk Back: Are iPads and students a bad mix for L.A. Unified? (Oct 1, 2013):
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-talk-back-ipads-20131001,0,3772378.story
#2 by Anonymous on October 2, 2013 - 7:55 am
Yes, and:
New problems surface in L.A. Unified’s iPad program
Hacking by students and missing iPads are only part of the problem. Did anyone ask if the teaching software is any good?
http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-0929-lopez-ipad-20130929,0,2398142.column
and
L.A. Unified takes back iPads as $1-billion plan hits hurdles (Sept 30, 2013): http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-1001-lausd-ipads-20131001,0,270074.story
School staff and students report that iPads were collected Friday at some schools. One official says only two-thirds of the $700 devices were turned in.
and
71 iPads issued to students have gone missing, LAUSD says (Sept 27, 2013): http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-ipads-issued-to-students-missing-20130927,0,3025015.story
#3 by Abellardo on October 2, 2013 - 10:10 am
Nothing good can come of this, nothing. This is no good for the students.
#4 by Joe Imbriano on October 3, 2013 - 8:20 am
You are correct. Aside from what I believe to be the intended goal of the deployment of this technology, that is the impact on human fertility, this will also put most of the teachers out of work eventually as well. LAUSD already has some classes with 50 students per teacher. The sky is the limit. I believe that there are some very depraved people involved in this agenda with a lot of clueless cowards along for the ride.