According to Apple’s product information guide, iPads can emit even more radiation than cell phones.http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1524/en_US/iPad_Important_Product_Information_Guide.pdf Also, the scientific literature clearly shows that children absorb more radiation than adults.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999884
According to the scientific evidence itself, in our opinion, it would be reasonable to state that children who use iPads for long periods of time are likely to have a significantly increased risk of developing cancer. Equally worrying is that in my opinion, children may actually suffer severe reproductive harm. So what kind of risk are we talking about? Isn’t that really the question? According to high quality independently funded research by Dr. Lennart Hardell of Sweden:
For every 100 hours of cellphone use, the risk of brain cancer increases by 5%.
So how many hours would children in Fullerton schools be exposed?
175 days x 6 hours = 875 hours per year.
That means after each year of exposure to these wireless devices there would be a 44% increased risk of brain cancer.
After 13 years, this comes to a 572% increased risk of cancer, for adults that is. For children, the increased risk would be much more, as research shows that they have at least double the risk of adults.
So according to these calculations, children would have an 1100% increased risk of brain cancer as a result of using an iPad at school. This does not include time spent doing homework or other extraneous activities. WiFi enabled devices such as tablets and laptops in the classroom possibly emit as much or more high frequency pulse modulated microwave radiation as a cell phone and they are in direct proximity to the children’s sensitive developing reproductive areas.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE LINK BELOW FROM THE LARGEST TRIAL BAR IN THE WORLD AS THEY WEIGH IN ON THE FCC’S RF EXPOSURE GUIDELINES.
13-84 09-03-2013 American Association For Justice 7520942173
FOLKS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR CHILDREN HERE. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR FUTURE. LET’S SHOW THAT WE CARE AND NOT JUST ACT LIKE IT.
#1 by LAUSD halts Ipad program on September 25, 2013 - 9:48 pm
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lausd-ipad-hack-20130925,0,6974454.story
#2 by Joe Imbriano on September 26, 2013 - 11:06 pm
1 billion taxpayer dollars, and I believe that it’s still not enough for Dr. John E. Deasy and Apple to irradiate the unsuspecting in the LAUSD against the wishes of those in the know as well as their very own teachers union UTLA:
https://thefullertoninformer.com/big-news-from-utla-they-oppose-the-same-dangers-that-we-do/
The kids have hacked the devices so they can get the internet and all the trappings. Did the Apple execs forget to tell the LAUSD that this could happen? There is just no way the computer giant could have ever forseen or imagined that the kids would do this now could they or was it part of the plan to recall them all back in and sell them an upgrade on the security features?
Meanwhile this hack bobble head reporter just told everyone else who hasn’t figured it out yet how to hack the rest of the devices. He brushes over the billion dollar boondoggle with a twinkle in his eye as the taxpayers are getting the billion dollar shaft. I heard the LAUSD may be ordering keyboards as well for these microwave transmitters?
Never mind what this is potentially doing to the children’s cognitive function, and physical and reproductive health. These kids in the LAUSD are not watching church services on these things at home either. Yeah, they need more screen time like Fullerton needs more potholes. This is awful.
#3 by LAUSD Shiny New Toys on September 27, 2013 - 6:39 am
“Like districts across the country, Detroit and Los Angeles are infatuated with fancy electronic devices, glossy new textbooks and DVDs “aligned” to top-down Common Core “standards, and other whiz-bang gadgetry to stimulate “21st century learning.” Education’s Shiny Toy Syndrome is the result of a toxic alliance between big government and big business.”
Educator’s Shiny Toy Syndrome: http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2013/09/27/educations-shiny-toy-syndrome-n1710872/page/2
#4 by Anonymous on September 27, 2013 - 7:40 am
This is going to turn children into robots and zombies. This is unbelievable. Where are the parents?
#5 by Parents? on September 27, 2013 - 4:29 pm
We are trying to reach and inform them.
There was a meeting with the two Fullerton school Superintendent’s on Monday evening. This was to discuss the Common Core, etc.; there are 20,000 + students in those districts and maybe 10 parents were in attendance. The parents are trusting those that are not to be trusted, as superintendents Pletka and Giokaris have shown by turning their backs on and steadfastly refusing to acknowledge any information contrary to their technology plans.
Meanwhile, it appears that Acacia Principal Whisnant, herself, would not accept the bookmark offered to her yesterday. The bookmark references several websites that address the problems with WiFi in the schools. In that same meeting, the teacher also refused the information. So, it appears there is solidarity among the teachers and staff to ignore any new information contrary to their plans, even if it endangers the health of the students.
How do we get to the point where people shut down and not even look at new information, especially when it involves the health and welfare of the children they are responsible for at school? Is there no one at FSD and FJUHSD that can look at two sides and employ critical thinking skills? Their behavior defies logical, rational thinking. Don’t these teachers, who are being instructed to stay away from this blog and not read other information, know that this is wrong? Don’t they know that their school is trying to censor information? Don’t they wonder why this is? Are they curious? Will there be disciplinary action taken against them if they look? Under what authority can your supervisor tell you not to look at information? Is this ethical, moral behavior?
That gets us back to this issue: if the school admin allows themselves to look at this information, they are legally liable for having done so. When problems start appearing and parents want to remedy the situation by suing the school district, if the school personnel never had that information that it was harmful, you can’t hold them liable.
So, their answer is to acknowledge that their is another side to the issue, but not engage or discuss the other side because once they discuss it, they are on the record for having known about it. Is this a Catch 22, circular logic?
Additionally, there is the risk management legal council (ASCIP) that I believe is telling the superintendents that the information on the pro-wired side is “inconclusive” and to go ahead based on FCC guidelines ( 17 years old, ignores non-thermal biological effects).
Of course, not looking at it leaves them unable to fulfill their responsibilities of ensuring the health and safety of our children while at school.
Parents and anyone reading this, this is your call: wake up, these are your children, your neighbors children, your nieces, nephews, friends. We are all in this together and we are all impacted by this.
#6 by Angie B on September 28, 2013 - 12:35 pm
Name Grade
R. Pletka F
G. Geokaris F
Both superintendents, responsible for running this circus, receive an F.