Heck tours are almost free these days
Is this Fullerton’s chief irradiator?
F.S.D. Superintendent, Robert Pletka
Word on the street is that our very own Robert Pletka is being sent to The White House folks. Yes he is one of the 100 school superintendents who was selected to be invited to meet the commander in chief irradiator, Mr. Barrak Obama.
So lets get down the reason for this so called honor. I believe that it is right here folks with the wireless WiFi antenna on his zipper:
Trust me folks, it is all about wireless.
The antenna in the lap on the ovaries with the frequency at set at 2.4 GHz is no accident.
Common Core is a part of the program along for the ride on the race to the bottom for your children.
And by the way, don’t kid yourself gang, the local election for the FJUHSD board of Trustees is all about wireless. There are the two newcomer establishment plants that want to bring wireless to the High Schools which the board has decided not to do at this time based on SAFETY CONCERNS!
It appears to be all about saving face for Pletka, and the five blind mice-Thompson, Berryman, Sugarman, Thornley and Meyer who just can’t live with this evil, despicable, archaic, and downright primitive hardwired classroom model Giokaris is providing with its so called GAP in technology. Actually, in my opinion, this is the only thing that may guarantee you having grandchildren if yours have so far managed to avoid the microwaving of their reproductive organs in the FSD.
Wireless is a big deal folks. Behind the scenes it is the talk of the town, it is a huge deal. As a matter of fact it is the biggest deal going on the planet right now for reasons that will undoubtedly blow your mind.
You see I believe that Robert Pletka is like no other School Superintendent in the Country because he, like no other, has had the stern warnings, the science, and the agenda served up on a silver platter, laid out in bright neon lights, in hundreds of thousands of pages of fliers literally littering the city, the Tuesday night specials, televised or not, the drop off, drive in banner welcome wagon crew and just the flat out zeal of Joe Imbriano-The Fullerton Informer.
But you see for Mr. Pletka, I believe he is either stuck on stupid or it is all about his ego. Wht else would he BLINDLY and WILLINGLY go along with programs like ConnectEd, Project Inkwell’s wireless manifesto found in the Aorta, Common Core, and ERate, which ultimately results in turning of your kids, not mine, into microwaved “citizens of the world”. This is all against the advice of Medical Doctors, Scientists, Public Health Researchers and against the wishes of parents. Yet he continues his forcibly exposing students to constant wireless microwave radiation emissions trillions of times normal background levels as a CONDITION OF RECEIVING A MIND BENDING, DOSSIER DEVELOPING, ALGORITHM ACTUALIZING, AND CRITICAL THINKING ATTACKING COMMON CORE INDOCTRINATION EXPERIENCE CALLED A 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION.
I guess he could care less about the California Ed Code and the fact that the last time I checked, the children were still pledging allegiance to the flag of The United States of America and TO THE REPUBLIC for which it stands NOT TO SOME WORLD CITIZENSHIP FORUM.
It is a good thing my children are not under his Marxist, Saul Alinsky type thumb, but are yours? The Common Core homework meltdowns are the least of your problems gang, believe me.
It is all about Robert Pletka folks. You know he has just handed over thousands of pages of scrubbed emails where he has ignored thousands of scientific studies that warn against the deployment of wireless systems and devices in the laps of children. Yes, he considers what is being presented a “PR” problem, not one of safety. I guess he knows better than all of the scientific community that sternly recommends hard wiring classrooms while he hands Apple MILLIONS OF WIRELESS TECH TAX DOLLARS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN USED TO HIRE MORE TEACHERS!
Robert Pletka, Fullerton’s high priest in the cult of Mac handing out communion (iPads) flanked by Tom Torlakson
Whats more, according to Pletka himself, “With the iPad, student learning will become self-paced through online Web 2.0 programs and networking tools,” said Robert Pletka, the Fullerton School District superintendent, in a letter issued to parents and families regarding the program.
Did you catch that facilitators, ehhm I mean teachers, ehhm , I mean soon to be out of work teachers? Yes, the model will not involve all of you pensioned lackeys that think you are untouchable. Your complicit silence on this whole issue is not just mind boggling, it is flat out just plain stupid. The pension funds are largely unfunded. Who taught you all your math? Most of you are all going to lose your jobs to all of this automation crap anyways so you might as well fight for what is right for the kids, not what packs your shoe closets or pays for the wine tasting and bacon strips in Europe.
It gets worse folks:
“Additionally, students will participate as “citizens of the world” with the ability to communicate, innovate, create and collaborate within and beyond the borders of their community to build broad-based knowledge and understandings of world cultures.”
Did you get that? Citizens of the world all while Robert Pletka is high on Common Core, loaded on technology and drunk on wireless.
There is an agenda to all of this folks, yes an AGENDA. Yeah, that dirty word that shuts everyone down when it is uttered yet everyone has one, no one wants to admit they do, and everyone’s lives are being ordered to, orchestrated around, controlled by while you are programmed by an idiot box that they have conned you into calling a smart TV. Agendas control all of us all of the time whether willfully, knowlingly or not.
As far as what is going on the schools and what Pletka and his five blind mice board members are blindly taking credit for that is yielding him up first class accommodations to Pennsylvania Avenue it is right here folks. It is very long, really disturbing, and pretty downright outrageous but go ahead, read it and weep.
Look, while this educrat lackey is still riding high on his accolades up in the ozone layer, I believe that he has demonstrated by his behavior, that this is all way above his pay grade and his ability to grasp. What is sad is that this is the kind of person that we find in these positions all over the country. To think he made the top 100 is pretty scary, but to the unsuspecting, it would appear to be an honor.
Your children are citizens of The United States which is a nation of laws. They are not citizens of the world ladies and gentlemen. Our nation is a Republic, a Constitutional Republic. The United States is not under a World Government. No wonder why we have the leaders we have.
Folks wisdom is what I believe this man lacks and courage is what I believe he is devoid of. I believe that what is best for your children equates to not being enrolled in one of his classrooms. Tell him what you think, that is if you dare to open your eyes and open your mouth.
Trust me, you will never be the same and may your children have the protections they deserve. Hey Bob, when you get there, tell ol’ Barry Boy that he can’t have access to my children’s brains, bloodstreams or have point blank microwave access to my children’s reproductive organs. And please let the Manchurian candidate know that I will keep my hope and he can keep his dirty change.
Is Pletka’s trip to the White House at the expense of the children’s health? I believe that it is. He is being rewarded for ramming wireless and common core down your throats folks.
Forgive them Father for they know not what they do.
#1 by Joe Imbriano on October 27, 2014 - 6:26 am
They are ramming this stuff down our throats as fast as they can
FCC Press Release:
FCC BOOSTS Wireless Broadband
FCC REPORT AND ORDER 14-153 RE: Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies WT Docket No. 13-32
These were adopted: October 17, 2014
http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-boosts-wireless-broadband-easing-infrastructure-burdens
Commission: Chairman Wheeler and Commissioners Clyburn, Rosenworcel, Pai, and O’Rielly each issued a separate statement. Excerpts:
Page 13 of 155:
26. Specifically, and as discussed in detail below, we take the following actions in connection with our NEPA review process: (1) we amend the existing NEPA categorical exclusion for antenna collocations on buildings and towers to clarify that it includes equipment associated with the antennas (such as wiring, cabling, cabinets, and backup-power equipment), and that it also covers collocations in a building’s interior, and we codify these clarifications; (2) we amend the NEPA categorical exclusion for collocations to cover collocations on structures other than buildings and towers; and (3) we adopt a new NEPA categorical exclusion for deployments, including deployments of new poles, in utility or communications rights-of-way that are in active use for such purposes, where the deployment does not constitute a substantial increase in size over the existing utility or communications uses.36
36 We emphasize that none of these exclusions, or any other action we take in this Report and Order, would exclude any facility from the requirement under our rules to conduct an Environmental Assessment if human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) emissions will exceed specified levels. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(b). We further note that the Commission issued a First Report and Order, Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, and Notice of Inquiry last year that addressed several issues regarding compliance with current RF exposure criteria, and sought comment on
whether to reassess the current limits. See Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency Exposure Limits and Policies; Proposed Changes in the Commission’s Rules Regarding Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, ET Docket Nos. 13-84, 03-137, First Report and Order, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and Notice of Inquiry, 28 FCC Rcd 3498 (2013) (RF Emissions R&O, FNPRM, & NOI). Because that proceeding remains open, we do not address comments filed in this proceeding to the extent they
suggest changes to our RF exposure standards.
Page 18 of 155:
…II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
18. In this Section, we summarize the steps we take to facilitate wireless infrastructure deployment. First, as detailed in Section III.B, we adopt the following measures with regard to our NEPA process for review of environmental effects:
· Amend the existing NEPA categorical exclusion for antenna collocations on buildings and towers to clarify that it includes equipment associated with the antennas (such as wiring, cabling, cabinets, and backup-power), and that it also covers collocations in a building’s interior;
· Amend the NEPA categorical exclusion for collocations to cover collocations on structures other than buildings and towers; and
· Adopt a new NEPA categorical exclusion for deployments, including deployments of new poles, in utility or communications rights-of-way that are in active use for such purposes, where the deployment does not constitute a substantial increase in size over the existing utility or communications uses.
All of these categorical exclusions are subject to Sections 1.1307(c) and (d) of the Commission’s rules, which require the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a proposed facility otherwise categorically excluded from environmental processing if the processing bureau, either on its own motion or in response to a public complaint, determines that it may have a significant environmental impact.31
…page 19 of 155:
36. Under Section 204 of NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is entrusted with NEPA oversight responsibility.65 CEQ’s regulations direct agencies to identify their Federal actions and place each within one of three categories.66 The first category encompasses actions that normally have a significant environmental impact. Before undertaking these actions, the agency must prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).67 The second category includes actions that may, but do not necessarily, have a significant environmental impact.68 For actions in this category, an agency may conduct an Environmental Assessment (EA) in lieu of an EIS.69 If the EA shows that a proposed action will have no significant environmental impact, then the agency issues a Finding of No Significant Impact,70 and the proposed action can proceed. Otherwise, the agency must proceed with the EIS process. The third category—“categorical exclusions”—covers actions that, based on the agency’s assessment, “do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment . . . and for which . . . neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.”71 CEQ regulations require that an agency that chooses to establish categorical exclusions must also provide for “extraordinary circumstances” under which an action that is normally categorically excluded may have a significant environmental effect and therefore require further NEPA review in an EA or EIS.72
…
In addition, under Section 1.1307(b) a facility may have a significant environmental impact if it would cause human exposure to RF
emissions in excess of specified levels.77
77 … noted above, the Commission has initiated a proceeding on RF emissions criteria, and that proceeding is pending. See supra, n.36.
————————————————————————————————
Re: In the Matter of Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, WT Docket No. 13-238; Acceleration of Broadband Deployment: Expanding the Reach and Reducing the Cost of Broadband Deployment by Improving Policies Regarding Public Rights of Way and Wireless Facilities Siting, WC Docket No. 11-59; 2012 Biennial Review of Telecommunications Regulations, WT Docket No. 13-32.
STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN TOM WHEELER
Last month’s record-setting launch of the new iPhone is just the latest reminder that our appetite for new mobile technologies appears to be insatiable. Mobile innovation is not only delighting U.S. consumers, it’s a major force in driving economic growth, boosting U.S. competitiveness, and enabling solutions to challenges like education and health care. As the demand for wireless technologies increases, so does the need for greater coverage and wireless network capacity. According to recent reports from the wireless industry, wireless data consumption has grown 732 percent since 2010. And Cisco forecasts that global mobile data traffic will increase 11-fold between 2013 and 2018. The Commission has been hard at work to make more licensed and unlicensed spectrum available to keep up with the growing demand. But making more spectrum available for broadband is just part of the Commission’s wireless agenda. High-speed mobile broadband also requires high-speed broadband buildout. However, the regulatory burdens associated with deployments can be expensive and time-consuming. This Order takes concrete steps to immediately and substantially ease those burdens. The Order recognizes that a technological revolution with regard to infrastructure deployment has changed the landscape. The current rules for deploying infrastructure were drafted at a time when antennas were huge and bolted to the top of enormous towers that were designed and built for the purpose of supporting those big antennas. Today, new Distributed Antenna System (DAS) networks and other small-cell systems use components that are a fraction of the size and can be installed – unobtrusively – on utility poles, buildings, and other existing structures. The Order we adopt today accounts for that change by crafting a more efficient process for small deployments and other installations that do not trigger concerns about environmental protection or historic preservation. The Order also implements federal statutory directives that are intended to make State and local review more efficient for wireless deployments and modifications. At the same time, the Order preserves our commitment to safeguard the essential roles that State, local, and Tribal governments play in this process. For instance, the Order preserves local governments’ authority to adopt and apply the zoning, safety, and concealment requirements that are appropriate for their communities. Taken together, the rules we adopt today lay the groundwork for delivering more wireless capacity in more locations to consumers throughout the United States—while staying true to our statutory obligations to protect the environment and historic properties, and with sufficient safeguards to protect local land-use
priorities as well as safety and aesthetic interests. This Order builds on previous Commission efforts to make the regulatory approval processes for wireless infrastructure more efficient and effective. In August, we substantially reformed tower lighting and marking requirements, which greatly eased compliance burdens for tower owners without any adverse impact on aviation safety. And we have already started additional discussions with government and non-governmental stakeholders to further facilitate review processes and encourage collocations on existing towers. In particular, we intend to further tailor our historic preservation review process by working with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) to implement broader fast-track federal reviews for small-scale wireless deployments. Thank you to the Wireless Bureau for your continued dedication to promoting broadband infrastructure deployment.
…STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER JESSICA ROSENWORCEL
If you want a wireless revolution, you need an evolution—in infrastructure. Mindful of this truth, today the Commission significantly evolves its policies for wireless facilities siting. That means we streamline many aspects of our tower siting rules to help encourage the deployment of wireless infrastructure. But what we do goes well beyond traditional towers. That’s because the rules we put in place today are our first steps to encourage deployment of infrastructure that is absolutely critical for the next generation of wireless service—5G. This is a good thing. Because the race to 5G is on. And in the next generation of wireless networks, traffic will change. We will see more data traveling wirelessly than ever before—between people, between people and machines, and between machines themselves. To accommodate all of this traffic, we will need to look anew at spectrum that is way, way up there—well beyond our traditional 3 GHz boundary for mobile broadband. But the physics of these far-off frequencies are different. They have smaller waves, multiplying our need for antenna systems. That means we need different infrastructure here on the ground. That means exploring new technologies like massive multiple-input, multiple output antenna arrays and hetnets that could change how we think about network topology. That means we need to start with new policies to support deployment of Distributed Antenna Systems and small cells. That is a critical part of what we do here today—and I am pleased to support it. Some revolutions begin with a bang—but this one starts with the heavy lift of hard work. So thank you to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau for your efforts to evolve our wireless siting policies and for your commitment to support infrastructure deployment—both in this generation of technology and the next.