TheFullertonInformer.com

According to Apple’s product information guide, iPads can emit even more radiation than cell phones.http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1524/en_US/iPad_Important_Product_Information_Guide.pdf Also, the scientific literature clearly shows that children absorb more radiation than adults.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999884

According to the scientific evidence itself, in our opinion, it would be reasonable to state that children who use iPads for long periods of time are likely to have a significantly increased risk of developing cancer. Equally worrying is that in my opinion, children may actually suffer severe reproductive harm. So what kind of risk are we talking about? Isn’t that really the question? According to high quality independently funded research by Dr. Lennart Hardell of Sweden:

For every 100 hours of cellphone use, the risk of brain cancer increases by 5%.

So how many hours would children in Fullerton schools be exposed?

175 days x 6 hours = 875 hours per year.

That means after each year of exposure to these wireless devices there would be a 44% increased risk of brain cancer.

After 13 years, this comes to a 572% increased risk of cancer, for adults that is. For children, the increased risk would be much more, as research shows that they have at least double the risk of adults.

So according to these calculations, children would have an 1100% increased risk of brain cancer as a result of using an iPad at school. This does not include time spent doing homework or other extraneous activities. WiFi enabled devices such as tablets and laptops  in the classroom possibly emit as much or more high frequency pulse modulated microwave radiation as a cell phone and they are in direct proximity to the children’s sensitive developing reproductive areas.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE LINK BELOW FROM THE LARGEST TRIAL BAR IN THE WORLD AS THEY WEIGH IN  ON THE FCC’S RF EXPOSURE  GUIDELINES.  

 13-84 09-03-2013 American Association For Justice 7520942173

FOLKS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR CHILDREN HERE. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR FUTURE. LET’S SHOW THAT WE CARE AND NOT JUST ACT LIKE IT. 

Waiter, they will take number 2 with a side of fries.

In the not so distant future, the unmitigated public health disaster in the making directly resulting from the wireless microwave radiation bombardment of human populations and the resultant environmental and human tragedy EMF issue will all be blamed on Fukushima. Just watch the talking heads on the idiot box begin to lay out the biggest red herring in human history with a twinkle in their eyes deeply recessed into their teleprompter reading face lifted mugs. Ladies and gentlemen you and your children are being had in a big bad way. Read the rest of this entry »

THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. THE NON THERMAL EFFECTS OF PULSE MODULATED MICROWAVE RADIATION HAVE BEEN KNOWN FOR LONGER THAN MANY OF US HAVE BEEN ALIVE. DO YOU THINK THAT THEY GOT IT ALL FIGURED OUT 46 YEARS LATER? WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW, MAY BE HARMING YOUR CHILDREN.

THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS A VERY INTERESTING READ TO SAY THE LEAST. JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT THINGS COULDN’T GET ANY STRANGER, THEY DO. STICK AROUND AND SEE WHAT WE AT THE FULLERTON INFORMER HAVE IN STORE.

http://wmamw.com/ProjBizarreWeapImp.htm

Oh yes, and non thermal effects of pulse modulated high frequency microwave radiation are just merely figments of our imaginations:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect

On March 5, 2013, The Fullerton Informer began the quest to end what we believe to be the largest forced irradiation of school children that the world has ever known.  Since that date we have logged close to 3 million hits from all over the world. We are by no means alone ladies and gentlemen.

Yes it all began as a result of an email from the Fullerton School District’s acting superintendent Dr. Robert Pletka.   I was previously involved with his office as a result of an investigation into my allegations of mistreatment of my son over at Acacia Elementary which directly involved principal Karen Whisnant and my son’s teacher Stephanie Givens. With the help of Trustee Chris Thompson, my wife and I arranged a meeting with Dr. Pletka to address my concerns. There was a subsequent investigation and upon conclusion of such, Dr. Pletka stated that he continued to believe that our concerns were real and he would take appropriate steps. The subsequent actions taken by the district were not made public but problems had ceased in the interim. It was’t long after that however, that they began again, remained ongoing, and ironically in my opinion, they still continue to this day. Stephanie Givens was awarded teacher of the year. The OC Register awarded Acacia Elementary the title of the number one school in Orange County and the smoke and mirrors  hid this bizarre irony for many.
Read the rest of this entry »

Push too late and it won’t work.

Yes the R.’s have it but not for much longer.  You know folks, I believe that the Fullerton School District parents and children deserve better than R. Schulze, the F.S.D.’s self proclaimed “attack dog of truth” in this fight, R. Pletka, the F.S.D.’s superintendent and what we believe to be his misleading safety assurances, and of course the slick moves of R. Craven, the soon to be ex F.S.D. technology director. 

What we believe is on the line are your children’s reproductive and physical health, cognitive function and critical thinking skills’ development in that order.

There are clearly two sides to this debate.  On one side it involves an entrenched trillion dollar industry involving companies like APPLE, CISCO, and GOOGLE with orders from The Executive Branch to roll this out, along with servile school administrators and staff who appear to be unable to wrap their arms around the other side of the story or simply refuse to expose themselves to it.  On the other side of the aisle are thousands of peer reviewed articles and the scientists behind them, flanked by parents that simply see the forest for the trees, sound the alarm and say no. So the ten thousand dollar question is why do the teachers, board members, administrators, staff, PTA and foundations all appear to have blindfolds on and earplugs in? We now begin to peel back the layers of the proverbial onion for you.

This just came in from Ray, one of our commenters that dares to care and dares to tell it like it is. With his logging thousands of hours of research on this issue spanning over 20 years, and his flagship website WIFI IN SCHOOLS.COM , he writes:

“Parents deserve quality information, not heavily biased industry-influenced reporting from a hack website. For the past several months we’ve been reading post after post by this R. Schulze individual. He’s been providing links to scientific reports claiming that EMR radiation is not a health issue.

Schulze has consistently refused to acknowledge any and all scientific evidence that reports EMR radiation to be harmful. He just pretends that it doesn’t exist, and instead refers us to links provided by a website called “EMF and Health”. This site is blatantly biased, and promotes a denialist perspective.

Well I did some digging on this website and learned founded by an electronics tycoon by the name of Lorne Trottier.

Trottier, who has deep ties to the wireless industry, financed an operation to public deny the hazards of EMR radiation and the validity of electro-sensitivity. He hired 60 academics, mostly from McGill University and Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, to which he has donated tens of millions of dollars.

Another of EMF and Health’s contributors is Michel Plante, a consultant for Hydro Quebec, one of the largest electrical utilities in Canada.
http://www.emfandhealth.com/About%20Us.html

Joe Schwarz of EMF and Health is also a known industry shill who not only defends the safety of EMF, but also the safety of Aspartame, pesticides, and GMO, etc, for companies the like of Monsanto. Schwartz is also the Director of McGill University’s Office for Science and Society, which is “dedicated to demystifying science for the public”, and which receives millions in funding from the Lorne Trottier family trust.
http://alexconstantine.blogspot.ca/2007/08/by-alex-constantine-reposted-dr.html

Parents deserve to have high quality scientific information and should be warned that the pro-EMF site Schulze has been referring to is anything but independent science.”

DON’T BANK YOUR FAMILY’S LINEAGE AND YOUR CHILDREN’S HEALTH ON EMPTY PROMISES BY THOSE WHO WILL LONG SINCE BE RETIRED  IF IT TURNS OUT THAT WE WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE ALL HAVE SKIN IN THIS GAME, AND THE REASON WE AT THE FULLERTON INFORMER DO IS SO THAT YOUR CHILDREN WON’T.

GET INFORMED AND GET INVOLVED.

]

WELL I GUESS IT DEPENDS ON WHO YOU ASK NOW DOESN’T IT?

DOES  THE EPA’S OWN SCIENTIST AGREE? http://thefullertoninformer.com/the-epa-tells-it-like-it-is-will-the-fsd/

I beleive that FSD’s very own Robert Pletka’s wireless classroom safety assurance: http://fsd.k12.ca.us/parent_resources/files/wireless.pdf  is a house of cards ladies and gentlemen.

Lets not forget what is keeping them up at night, and maybe even you too as studies have shown that invisible microwave electromagnetic radiation from WiFi, laptops, tablets and cell phones inhibit the production of a hormone called melatonin.  Melatonin is produced by the pineal gland  in the brain and one of its primary functions is to regulate our sleep cycle. When inadequate amounts of melatonin are produced our sleep cycle is compromised.
Why is this important? If you don’t get into the deeper phases of the sleep cycle at night the body cannot repair itself. Cells aren’t rejuvenated. Sleep is necessary for growth as well this repair process to occur and we all need it, especially our children.

Here is a letter from a local parent sent to all governing authorities involved in this issue:

I am a Southern California mother of three and have a child in a school that is implementing one to one technology in the classroom. It was not until I stumbled upon information regarding wireless radiation that I became aware of the extremely critical health implications of such an environment in which 30+ wireless devices, operating 6 hours/day, 180 days/year for a child’s school career, are emitting an unprecedented amount of radiation on our children. In the process, I discovered a bottomless pit of studies and information that attest to the harms of wireless radiation.

The parents do not know that they are sending their children into an environment, surrounded by a Class 2b Carcinogen, classified as such by the World Health Organization. That is the same classification as lead, DDT, and engine exhaust. In what context would a classroom filled with engine exhaust ever be okay? The parents do not know that medical doctors, scientists, and researchers are identifying the following wireless radiation health effects: ADHD, autism, infertility, DNA damage to human sperm, childhood leukemia, neurological and cardiovascular problems, cognitive disfunction, pain, fatigue, mood disorders, dizziness, nausea, weakness, and skin problems. The question is: what is this wireless radiation doing to the human eggs in our daughters? Additionally, many of these health problems are not immediately evident and manifest themselves years after exposure, which makes everyone think that there are no harms from these emissions. The parents do not know that research into wireless radiation has been going on for decades and has yielded thousands of studies indicating harm: http://www.justproveit.net/content/prove-it-initiative-main
The parents do not know that something that they cannot see, hear, touch, smell or taste is a danger to their children. The parents do not know the numerous websites that have cropped up addressing just the subject of wireless classrooms:

WiFi In Schools, United States
WiFi In Schools, United Kingdom
WiFi In Schools, Australia
Citizens 4 Safe Technology
Center For Safer Wireless
Safe In School
Safe School
School Radiation Dot Com

The time is past due for the FCC to acknowledge the dangers of wireless radiation. Wireless technology has an implied safety that is dangerous and not justified. People, if they were aware of this information, would feel that there is immediate need for the FCC to step in and re-establish guidelines to ensure the public health.

The general population will begin finding out the following facts about the FCC’s role in allowing the unfettered proliferation of wireless radiation on our children and loved ones:

Facts

1) The FCC guidelines were last updated in 1996; that was 17 years ago. Why is that?
2) The FCC guidelines are based on thermal exposure and completely ignore non-thermal biological effects. Why is that? Non- thermal effects are the concern with wireless radiation.
3) No long-term studies have been funded on the non-thermal effects of wireless radiation. Why is that?
4) FCC current exposure guidelines allow for hundreds of trillions of times more exposure than our parents were exposed to as children. Why is that?

Parents are unknowingly sending their children back to school this Fall into classrooms filled with wireless radiation and there is no choice in the matter. These decisions are being made for the parents. School districts, when confronted with the harms of wireless classrooms, ignore or discount it because it conflicts with their one to one technology plans. They stand on the FCC’s guidelines and tech industry funded studies as reason for safety and are dismissive of parents raising concerns. Wired technology is known to be safe and a healthy choice for our children. Why take the risk with our children’s health with wireless?

Parents and the general public are trusting in the FCC to be taking care of this and, clearly, with 1996 guidelines, that is not the case. In the schools, knowledgeable parents are caught between administrators who falsely proclaim wireless radiation as “totally safe”, that there is no “absolute proof” of the harms of wireless radiation, resting on outdated FCC guidelines, and, what is now, decades of research that says it is not.

Please consider the application of the Precautionary Principle, as stated by Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director, Center for Family and Community Health, University of California, Berkeley, in a letter dated February 8, 2013, to the Los Angeles Unified School District writes: “The precautionary principle should be applied to this critical policy decision. This principle, developed at a U.N. environmental conference in 1992 states that in the absence of scientific consensus if an action has a suspected risk of causing harm, the burden of proof it is not harmful falls on those taking the action, and all reasonable measures to reduce the risk must be taken.” Our school children should not be in classrooms with wireless radiation until it can be proved that it is safe.

The urgency of this matter cannot be overstated. The health issues of wireless radiation are not going away. Many of these issues, such as dramatic growth rates of autism diagnosis and ADHD, are unaccounted for. The causes have not been identified. Our rate in Orange County CA is now 1 in 63. The FCC has a tremendous responsibility and a great opportunity to step forward and do the right thing. Please, incorporate the Precautionary Principle in the FCC guidelines, now, and call a halt to wireless radiation in our classrooms until it can be proven safe.

Finally, what does it say about us if we, as human beings, do not ensure the safety of our most vulnerable, our children?

Thank you,

Fullerton Mom

 THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT’S FORCED IRRADIATION OF OUR CHILDREN NEEDS TO COME TO AN END IMMEDIATELY!

PLEASE CONTACT THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA AND DEMAND THAT HE TURN THESE INDUSTRIAL  WIFI SYSTEMS OFF IN ALL OF THE CLASSROOMS. 

This new paper that asserts the reproductive systems of girls and boys is being adversely affected by exposure to microwave radiation from wireless  technology.  http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/Humanity-at-the-Brink–Barrie-Trower,15,3333

You know it isn’t often that a spark of love comes our way from the good old Madison Avenue crew. This one is white hot. August has always been good to me as I am a gardener in case you didn’t know. This year the horn of plenty came through again as it has been a rather mild summer in some respects and one that has been literally hotter than hell in others.  Read the rest of this entry »

Is Autism  a direct result of wireless microwave EMF emissions acting upon the brains and intestines of  the anemic unborn, barbaric birthing procedures and vaccines?  Is this the medical establishment with their eyes wide shut, the Autism researchers  and foundations hiding up in first class and the wireless industry literally waiting in the wings staring them in the face together on a flight taking our unborn and newborn children straight into an uncertain future?  Get your tickets in advance for this one folks.   

Not too long ago, I put forth the following article on this very topic on this very blog: https://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/

SO IS THIS  WHERE THE RUBBER NOW MEETS THE ROAD?

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/08/07/even-when-its-not-all-about-vaccines-its-all-about-vaccines/

 Maybe so for now but this wheel turns awful fast. In the meantime, let’s hope all of their carbonyl iron levels are where they need to be as they all fly in circles on their flat earth.

I GUESS WE GOT THEIR ATTENTION FOR ALL IT IS WORTH.

THE MOST DANGEROUS PLACE IN AMERICA TODAY IS STILL INSIDE OF A MOTHER’S WOMB.  YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD KNOW BETTER OR AT LEAST WANT TO HELP.

Keep Our Children’s School Technology Safe, It’s Time To Apply the Precautionary Principle-by a loving, concerned Fullerton mother.

There are two sides of the argument of whether or not WiFi belongs in our children’s classrooms.  Let’s remember that it is not a question of whether or not technology will be part of the student’s education, but whether it is wired or wireless (WiFi).  Wired technology is a more secure and reliable connection with virtually no safety issues.  WiFi communication is achieved with microwave electromagnetic frequency emissions that result in our children being exposed to wireless radiation in the classroom.

Those who are pushing for wireless technology stand with studies funded by the tech industry, and tech industry’s literature that attest to its safety.  This side says there are no long-term studies that say wireless radiation is harmful. They also point to FCC guidelines as the reason to claim that it is safe.

Let’s look at the FCC guidelines.  These criteria were last updated 17 years ago, in 1996.  If we think back to that time, technology was very different from today.  The use and amount of devices has grown and proliferated.  Equally significant, the guidelines ignore non-thermal biological effects, which is the safety concern with wireless radiation. Given this, it could easily be said that the FCC guidelines are antiquated and, consequently, potentially dangerous.

Those who do not want wireless radiation in their children’s classroom can point to:

More than 5000 studies: http://www.justproveit.net/studies

Letters from MDs, researchers and scientists imploring the Los Angeles Unified School District school board to opt for wired technologies:

http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html

Numerous websites (I’m still coming upon more):

WiFi In Schools  US

WiFi In Schools UK

WiFi In Schools  Austrailia

Citizens 4 Safe Technology

Center For Safer Wireless

Safe School

Prove It

Countless videos (this is not all):

Dr.  Magda Havas:  WiFi In Schools is Safe.  True or False?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6v75sKAUFdc

WiFi In Schools:  Testing for Microwave Radiation Dangers In the Classroom: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FO0AnNHz8vI

There is not much we can do about antiquated FCC guidelines, and there is not much we can do about the lack of funding, which has prevented the needed long-term studies.  We can recognize there are two sides to the issue, and that we must, above all else, provide for the safety of our children.  The safety of our school technology must come first, over its method of delivery:  wired or wireless.

Recognizing the disparity of  these two viewpoints, it is imperative that we act in the best interests of the children.  To do so, we acknowledge the two sides and use the precautionary principle.  As Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director, Center for Family and Community Health, University of California, Berkeley, in a letter dated February 8, 2013, to Los Angeles USD:

“The precautionary principle should be applied to this critical policy decision.  This principle, developed at a U.N. environmental conference in 1992 states that in the absence of scientific consensus if an action has a suspected risk of causing harm, the burden of proof it is not harmful falls on those taking the action, and all reasonable measures to reduce the risk must be taken.”

There is an “absence of scientific consensus”; there is “a suspected risk of causing harm”; the “burden of proof” rests with the side pushing wireless radiation into the classroom.  That side has not met the burden of proof that it cannot harm our children.  The “reasonable” measure is right in front of us and it will not harm our children, it is wired technology.

Let’s not risk the health of our children, let’s do the right and precautionary thing and keep safety first with our school technology.  Let’s apply the precautionary principle and use only wired technology in our schools.  The F.S.D. has a world class opportunity to do what we believe is the right thing.

WHICH ONE OF THESE IS THE INSTRUCTION MANUAL?

I sent an email over the firm that the district hired to do the RF survey over at Acacia Elementary. I can’t make heads or tails out of those numbers because even the cheapest RF meter that I own, detects WiFi outside the building , which they couldn’t manage to detect  the first time the gang showed up at Acacia with their RENTED equipment (huge red flag).

I showed up at open house with my low end equipment, and mind you there were NOT 35  Ipads running like they supposedly had on when they did their survey, and I detected levels astronomically higher coming off of just the router in a kindergarten class with no IPads running compared to what they reported on their second visit with an even more sophisticated, $50,000 piece of RENTED equipment (huge red flag), that in reality takes a trained expert with tremendous experience to operate and to accurately measure RF levels.  O.K, lets cut to the chase gang:

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: joe imbriano <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:43 PM
Subject: Fwd: FSD RF report
To: info@execenv.com, info@thefullertoninformer.com

2nd request

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: joe imbriano <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:48 PM
Subject: FSD RF report
To: info@execenv.com, info@thefullertoninformer.com

I would like to know as a parent of 4 students in the FSD, how many RF emission surveys has your firm conducted over the last 20 years? As a parent of children in the FSD, I am deeply concerned with the results that you have put forth.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: joe imbriano <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:28 PM
Subject: FSD RF report
To: info@execenv.com, info@thefullertoninformer.com

3rd request

I would like to know as a parent of 4 students in the FSD, how many RF emission surveys has your firm conducted over the last 20 years? As a parent of children in the FSD, I am deeply concerned with the results that you have put forth.

Thank you

Joe Imbriano

 

WE WILL BE SURE TO LET YOU KNOW AS SOON AS WE FIND OUT.

The FSD and its lackeys say “Now move along folks. There ain’t nothin’ here for you to see.”

On July 9, 2013, thefullertoninformer.com reached a milestone after just 4 short months up and running. We logged  over 20,000 hits in a single 24 hour period with visitors from all over the world. Why are so many people looking at this site if we are all  a bunch of nut jobs?   Well if we are, then at least we are not alone and most certainly in good company. We are not some hack operation that plays an active role in  perpetuating this massive ongoing public health crisis. Sorry gang, we are not into holding the truth in unrighteousness and suppressing the evidence for and the causes of infertility and childhood diseases induced by barbaric hospital and medical procedures, petrochemical pharmaceutical poisons and  EMF microwave radiation exposures that we  clearly believe are preventable. 

There is no DONATE button on this site and there never will be. Our advice may seem cheap to some but it will always be free to all. What you read here you won’t find anywhere else and believe me folks, we are just gettin’ started.  Everyone’s 2 cents is welcome here so join the discussion.

 The best things in life are still free my friends. Won’t you join us and help us continue to get the word out?  Thanks a million.

You all have 29 minutes to spare for the kids? It is high time to get ya’ll off of the milk and onto some solid food.

Wireless Classrooms: Are they safe? part 2

For several months now I have been patiently waiting for permission to film and record the microwave radiation level readings in the wireless classrooms at my children’s school Acacia Elementary, which was voted the number one elementary school in The O.C. by the O.C. Ragister (yes the Ragister). Well they won’t let me in to do my own readings just yet. I was told that it would be disruptive to the learning process. You know, I believe that they really weren’t kidding when the experts over at Executive Environmental got the cushy gig from the District to go in and tell us what we have all been waiting to hear. Could it have been a hack job designed to turn out what the FSD wanted to hear?

I believe that they were undergoing on the job training on the taxpayer dime when they found EMF readings that could only be found on  the inside of a Faraday cage or down and out in the Okefenokee swamp. Hey gang, get a load of this April fools joke on the Fourth of July. The FSD is way more than a day late and a dollar short on this one. I don’t know about you all but I want my money back.

ACACIA’S READINGS ACTUALLY WERE REPORTED BY EXECUTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL TO BE EVEN LOWER THAN 0.01. PEAK AVERAGES WERE REPORTED TO BE IN THE RANGE OF 0.001 MICRO WATT PER SQUARE CENTIMETER AND AVERAGES WERE REPORTED TO BE IN THE 0.0000001-0.000007 RANGE-THERE IS NO WAY THEY WOULD EVEN SHOW UP ON THIS GRAPH AT THOSE LEVELS.