Posted by Joe Imbriano in The twighlight's last gleaming on May 25, 2014
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE LAST FULLERTON
CITY COUNCIL MEETING. I REPORT, YOU DECIDE. by Barry Levinson
BARRY LEVINSON
First, the agenda item to amend and strengthen Ordinance No. 3149, our Child Sex Offender Residency Restriction Law. The council and Joe Felz agreed to allow me to collaborate in working toward a revised and improved Ordinance No. 3149. Mr. Felz assured me more than once during the process that any differences I had with the city attorney’s recommendations, I would be given ample opportunity to make my case completely before the council on May 20th. Well Mr. Felz I guess you forgot about your promise to me because right in the middle of my comments and concerns about the city attorney’s revised document Mayor Chaffee cut me off. Mr. Felz did not then speak up and remind the Mayor that both he, (Joe Felz) and the council had assured me that I would have ample time to speak before the council. No Mr. Felz was as quiet as a church mouse.
FULLERTON’S CITY MANAGER JOE FELZ
When I reminded Mayor Chaffee that I was promised this would be a collaborative process and I would have the necessary time to make my points, he rudely said to me that I already went over the 3 minute public comment limit by about a minute or so as the video proves. I followed the Mayor’s wishes even though he failed to keep both the council’s promise and the city manager’s (Felz) promise to me to be allowed to make my case fully before the council. However, it gets worse, much worse. When the agenda item came back to council and council members were allowed to speak, Council member Whitaker stated that he thought the Mayor’s behavior toward me was not proper and disrespectful and that he wanted to allow me the opportunity to finish my thoughts on the topic. Mayor Chaffee rudely stated that public comments were over and refused to let me speak at the request of Council member Whitaker. Let me make two things very clear.
First, Mayor Chaffee was not elected Mayor by the people of Fullerton but rather appointed based primarily on political considerations to the mainly cosmetic post of Mayor. Second, based on the continued dictatorial actions by the aforementioned appointed Mayor Chaffee, as well as his rudeness to the public (he originally denied AJ Redkey from speaking at public comments even though he had a public comment number to speak)
He has shown his true colors and should be asked to step down from the council. Please do not expect that to happen, but we the peoplecan make him step down in November when he runs for reelection.Well after the Mayor refused to allow the request by Council member Whitaker, Council member Sebourn and the Council member Flory,(in that order) said that I should be allowed to speak and because they had the votes to override the Mayor, I was then allowed to finish my comments.
Appointed Mayor Chaffee would probably call himself a liberal. The word liberal used to mean someone who stands for personal liberty and the civil rights of all. Chaffee’s actions belie that definition 100%. Dictator certainly describes the way he behaved at last night’s council meeting, trying to run rough shot over the other council members and it was certainly not the first time he has behaved in such an unbecoming fashion. One last point on the revision of Ordinance No. 3149. My suggestion was to not vote on the ordinance, as there were changes that the city agreed to make to the document. My suggestion was to direct the city attorney to make those changes and have a final draft document ready for the next council meeting. Only Council member Bruce Whitaker supported that very sensible idea. For that reason and that reason only, Council member Whitaker voted against the agenda item. In fact he was the most supportive of any of the council members and without his support to allow me to finish giving my suggestions, some important items would probably been left out of the ordinance.
On the Civics in Open Negotiation presentation, Ms. Gretchen Beatty basically followed the previous guidance of the majority of the council and provided Fullerton’s outlined version of COIN, which basically watered down the independence and oversight portions of the Costa Mesa COIN ordinance. You see the independent negotiator might cost the city a whopping 20,000 dollars to cover all bargaining units negotiations. This was Ms. Beatty’s estimate not mine. It is amazing to me how quickly the status quo becomes so tight fisted when they are against a proposal. We just incurred more than a 20 million-taxpayer liability because the city and city attorney’s recommendation to not settle the Verona homeowner mudslide lawsuit resulted in the city loosing the case.
WHATS THE PASS THROUGH RATE ON THIS?
No problem a 6 million dollar bond will pay for most of it over the next 20 – 25 years at a total cost of the aforementioned over 20 million of our tax dollars. Just another example of how some might say we are wasting are tax dollars when we do not have any money to squander, period. The city leadership in my opinion, starting with Joe Felz is trying to make COIN as weak as possible to keep the status quo. It is so informative to learn that so many who are appointed or elected to serve the people would be working so hard to diminish an ordinance whose only goal is to provide the taxpayer with information for the very first time about the negotiating process before it becomes a faitaccompli, usually all behind closed doors.
Ask anyone who objects to the Costa Mesa COIN ordinance that is working so well in Costa Mesa, why they do not like that model? That model attempts for the very first time to put the taxpayer, the people who pay for all city employees, to have timely access to the same information as the city leadership insiders have. An objective negotiating process that places the employees and the employer i.e. the taxpayers of Fullerton on equal footing. Those that protest too much I would suggest are not for openness, transparency and fairness. I say this because the Costa Mesa version of COIN is precisely those things!
Onto another council topic relating to the arrest of AJ Redkey in Pasadena a few days ago. 6 FPD officers, mostly undercover went to Pasadena earlier this month to arrest AJ for an outstanding misdemeanor warrant, for failure to disperse (I guess not quickly enough according to the FPD) at the January 2014 protest outside of FPD headquarters over the KT not-guilty verdicts. Well, do not worry ladies and gentlemen, even though the 6 involved FPD officers have not and apparently will not serve one day in jail over their actions that directly lead to the death of Kelly Thomas, it appears now that some of the protestors apparently will serve some time.
There appeared to be no “good” reason why AJ attracted so much FPD attention in Pasadena. If anyone would do a Freedom of Information request about the number of outstanding felony warrants in the city of Fullerton, you would most likely find evidence that those 6 FPD officers going to Pasadena was a terrible misuse of taxpayer dollars.
Dan Hughes by this action alone has made it clear that the FPD has not been reformed.
FPD’S DAN HUGHES
Is what he did illegal or even harassment under the law, probably not. However, his action with regard to AJ tells us that he is not using what he claims is his understaffed FPD manpower to its best use. Do not expect him to respond to the many members of the public who spoke out at yesterday’s council meeting. The chief would not even look at the people speaking to him, let alone answer their questions. These are legitimate issues that demand an answer from him. I guess we can all look forward to FPD open house day (not ever to be confused with open and transparent FPD on any day) or another article by his paid consultant, Bill Rams in the Thursday edition of the Fullerton News Tribune. Dan for an understaffed department, you sure no how to waste taxpayer monies on non-essential “police services”.
Finally there is one more very important item to report to you from yesterday’s council meeting. With the passage of a revised Child Sex Offender Residency Restriction Ordinance, it would seem a faitaccompli that are children will be better protected under the law from dangerous child sexual predators. However, this would not be the case if the Police Chief did not replace Reserve Officer Bill Wallis with another full-time reserve officer solely dedicated to tracking our sex offender population and enforcing all the laws that relate to them. Yet I have asked for the name of Bill Wallis replacement 4 different times between asking City Manager Joe Felz and Police Chief Dan Hughes via email and in person, never receiving that information. They both refused to respond to my direct inquiries not once but twice at the last 2 city council meetings. In fact, Mayor Chaffee stated I would get a response later in the council meeting and yet it never happened. How easily our Mayor breaks his promise while hosting our city council meeting. He gives his word that I will get a response later that evening and then he or Police Chief Hughes or City Manager Felz fail to answer my inquiry during the rest of the council meeting. Just another reason why the voters should remove Mayor Chaffee from office this November and at the same time start demanding some accountability by our to top appointed city positions, police chief and city manager.
It has been an incredibly busy and stressful April and May for both my wife and myself. We forced the status quo to bend to the needs and wishes of the people with regard to helping to protect our children from dangerous pedophiles. That effort by the people is not over by a long shot for the very reasons I just explained right above. We live in very dangerous times, where our government sometimes acts more like a third world banana dictatorship than the America we studied in school during our civics lessons. But all I can ask of you is to not give up the good fight, for ladies and gentleman, saving our country from the growing corruption within, is a fight very much worth making!
EVERYDAY, I AM LOOKING OUT FOR YOU, THE CITIZENS OF FULLERTON!
BARRY LEVINSON
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on May 21, 2014
In 2014, a conspiracy theory is nothing more than imbecilic vernacular for an inconvenient truth. This is the reader’s digest version of what I believe this is all about. Yup, these control freaks in academia and media tell us that we humans are trashing the planet while the air has never been cleaner, that geo-engineering/chemtrail induced drought and extreme weather , ehhm, I mean climate change is upon us, there is not enough land in the hands of the BLM (the 640 million acres off limits to development in the US alone) ehhm, I mean there is not enough land left in the compact cities, and that the sky is falling because the plant food levels, ehhm I mean the Co2 levels are way too high. Almost every tree for a 100 miles in any direction in the So Cal garden of Eden climate that are planted by virtually every Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on May 19, 2014
Everyone that you will see in this video knows about the two sides of this issue. There are many other key players in this saga who are not in this 7 minute damage control piece. Ladies and gentlemen. We all make choices and the choices we make will have to be lived with for the rest of our God given lives. I have no problem with technology. This message was produced and delivered via a hardwired desktop computer. The problem that I have is with the wireless radiation that the district has chosen to spray from wireless access points into the classrooms to bridge the gap from the fiber optic cables in the walls to the students devices. I am not alone. It is the position of many scientific experts in the fields of neurology, physics, biochemistry, engineering, public health, environmental medicine and mainstream medicine that wireless microwave radiation DOES NOT BELONG IN A
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Are they turning their backs on the children? on May 15, 2014
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – May 12, 2014
SCIENTIFIC COVER-UP AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS
IS THERE A SCIENTIST IN THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S SCENIHR & THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION WHO IS SUPPRESSING LENNART HARDELL’S SCIENCE?
By Susan Foster
In May 2011 the World Health Organization’s cancer committee, IARC, voted to classify the RF – EMF Spectrum as a 2B or “possible human carcinogen.” Worldwide attention was once again focused on the possible cancer causing effects of RF (microwave) radiation, yet in the three years since the 2B classification, two divergent paths have been taken with respect to the science focusing on cell phones and brain tumors.
On one hand, the Hardell Group from Sweden led by oncologist Dr. Lennart Hardell published five more studies in 2013 – Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Joe Imbriano in The Way on May 11, 2014
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Are they turning their backs on the children? on May 3, 2014
BY BARRY LEVINSON.
Fullerton resident Barry Levinson
UPDATE ON ORDINANCE NO. 3149 – WHIC PROTECTS CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL PREDATORS
WE STILL HAVE MUCH WORK TO DO (STARTING WITH THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 6TH) TO ENSURE OUR ORDINANCE REMAINS AN EFFECTIVE AND STRONG TOOL IN HELPING US KEEP OUR KIDS SAFE FROM SEXUAL PREDATORS
My wife Susan and I had been instrumental in getting Fullerton Ordinance No. 3149 (the Child Sex Offender Protection Law) passed in 2010. We also have been vigilant in protecting it since that time. We spoke out at the last council meeting to condemn the city for making the decision to not enforce the ordinance for the last year. And we are speaking out now to insist that the public has a role in ensuring that our ordinance does not get repealed but that it gets updated properly.
Please be assured that Susan and I will not rest until we know for sure that Ordinance No. 3149 remains strong and effective to protect the most vulnerable among us, our children! This is not a time to sit back and believe we have won! All of you must be present at our May 6th meeting to let the council, the city manager and the city attorney know that we strongly believe that a public study session must be held to allow for public comment and participation. This must take place before the council votes to accept the city manager’s and city attorney’s recommendations to direct the city attorney (with little or no specific guidance from council) to draft any and all changes and improvements to the Ordinance. We demand an open and transparent process to ensure the very best results. Although Susan and I are relieved that the repeal of Ordinance No. 3149 has been removed from the city’s consideration, we still believe the city has more work to do to ensure that this ordinance is amended and strengthened properly.
Accuracy and attention to detail must be followed to ensure that our amended ordinance makes for a strengthened and effective law. The agenda as seen at: http://ci.fullerton.ca.us/about/meetings_live.asp (click on agenda) displays a number of significant errors.
Agenda Item No. 15 begins as follows:
“In the 1990’s, the federal and state governments enacted various pieces of legislation intended to protect minors from registered sex offenders including megan’s law adopted at the federal level in 1996 and chelsea’s law and the voter-approved Jessica’s law adopted at the state level.”
Fact: Chelsea’s Law was not enacted in the 1990’s as stated above but rather was signed into law by Governor Schwarzenegger in September 2010.
Fact: Jessica’s Law also known as Proposition No. 83 was passed by a vote of the people of California on November 7, 2006 – not in the 1990’s as stated in the agenda item. It was passed by a direct vote of the people agenda item as well. It does not give me comfort that these rather significant errors have been overlooked by our city manager and city attorney and issued as a formal city document.
To summarize, I need dozens of people to attend the May 6th meeting starting at 6:30 PM. Please do not assume others will attend and your presence is not necessary. It is not only necessary, it is vital that you come and speak up for the rights and safety of our children.
Why would the city manager, the city attorney and a majority of our city council be against a public study session that would both allow for the people’s participation and allow for the free flow of factual information that people like myself possess?
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on April 16, 2014
Hilda Sugarman, a member of the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees, “My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7,” Sugarman said about iPad use. “
The dangers of microwave radiation have been known for decades. The dangers of the wrong people in positions of authority have been known for millenia.
Wireless dangers have been thoroughly presented to the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees for the better part of over a year now.
There are well over 20,000 research papers written on the effects of RF/EMF radiation according to John Osepchuck, PhD the chair of IEEE/ASTM and the the biological effects have been known since the 1920s.
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on April 15, 2014
Make no bones about it, the dosage is higher than a kite and it is not what the doctor ordered. Are your kids at risk at school in these wireless classrooms with the schools using commercial or industrial grade routers that broadcast on several frequencies at the same time? You want your kids slouched over an in use wireless radiation emitting cell phone all day? How about at home or everywhere else with these things right in front of their heads and in their laps all the time? That is exactly what your children are doing at school and at home. These tablet devices are microwave transmitters and emit wireless radiation trillions of times the normal background levels that many of us and our parents were exposed to as children.
What will it take to get the parents to act . I think that there are many obstacles, not the least of which is them dealing with the fact that they themselves have been irradiating their children since the beginning. So if they acknowledge this as harmful, then they have to deal with their guilt. It is time to deal with reality, swallow the pride and put your children ahead of your fears, the school administrators and your fair weather friends ladies and gentlemen. We are talking about your kids, a trillion dollar industry that doesn’t give a rat’s behind about them, and school administrators that will do whatever they are ordered to do without batting an eye. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on April 1, 2014
On March 5th, 2013, we launched this website to end the largest forced irradiation of children that the world has ever known. Millions and millions and millions of hits spanning the globe and all levels of the power structure on the planet indicate that we have struck a nerve. What do we get for our birthday? http://fsd.k12.ca.us/index.html
HERE IS OUR OPINION OF THEIR PROPAGANDA AND OUR SATIRICALLY SERIOUS VERSION AS SEEN THROUGH THE DONNING OF THE “THEY LIVE” GLASSES. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on March 18, 2014
The following is a presentation by Dr. Martin Pall, PhD., Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, presenting to the Oregon State Legislature House Committee on Health Care. Feb 24, 2014.
[1] The total cumulative amount of RF/EMF microwave radiation in any classroom is what really matters — radiation from all sources: routers, access point and devices.
[2] The FCC RF/EMF microwave radiation guideline is meaningless because it does not consider total cumulative radiation and only applies to one device; it does not consider the total cumulative radiation from all wireless devices in the room.
[3] Senior engineers at the FCC and OSHA have agreed, in writing, how to calculate total cumulative microwave radiation exposure from any wireless device: the peak power density measured 18″ from the device times the total number of pulses transmitted by each antenna of each wireless device over the entire school day times the length (in fractions of seconds) of the duration of each pulse. When you plug in real numbers, the totals are staggering: at least 8 times higher than the current adult maximum public exposure guideline for RF/EMF microwave radiation for every school day (http://rfemf.com/counter.html
[4] We have a Watt problem in our country. Watts, delivered over time, is the measure of how much electricity we use. People, in general, are confused about what is a high power (many Watts) and what is low power (fractions of Watts). We falsely think that a bright 100-Watt light bulb is high power and a dim 25-Watt light bulb is low power. The truth is anything in the range of 1-150 Watts is hugely-high power compared to the electricity our bodies use every day to run our heart, our muscles, our kidneys and our brains.
Our cells operate at picoWatts or one trillionth of a Watt. Said another way it takes ten trillion picoWatts to equal 10 watts, which is the the amount of electricity our FCC guideline allows each Wi-Fi device to shoot into the air and through our children’s brains and bodies at over six million miles per hour. It is not at all surprising that electricity that is
[a] ten trillion times higher than natural levels, and that
[b] shoots through our children at over six million miles per hour
might cause their cells to misfire. You think? That’s what’s happening all day long in classrooms with wireless connectivity. Wireless connectivity creates hazardous conditions for our children.
Wi-Fi is electricity sprayed into the air at very high speeds. It is designed to penetrate through wood, concrete and our children. So if our children are allowed to get 10 watts of electricity through the air from one device, what if we have 24 devices in a classroom? That is 240 watts. Do you want 240 Watts of electricity shooting through your children’s brains and bodies, six hours a day, 180 days per year?
What are our school officials thinking? Wireless signals at the very same levels in classrooms today was used as a weapon in World War II. Our leaders and industry lobbyists just conveniently forgot about that. Apparently, it is more important to have a robust economy based on wireless signals than it is to protect our children’s brains, bodies and future fertility.
Using wired connectivity in schools to distribute our internet traffic through Ethernet wires eliminates this problem. Wireless connectivity offers over 15 times higher bandwidth and much greater security at a lower cost, compared to wired connections. It is a proven solution that exists today.
I called the phone number on the Feb 24, 2014 meeting announcement and spoke to a woman who told me that the HHC-201402241308.ram is a RealPlayer audio file. To play/hear this audio file, I had to download and install the free Realplayer 16 media player software onto my HP/Windows 8 laptop, which I did. RealPlayer can be downloaded for free by clicking the orange button, called “RealPlayer Free Download” at the top right corner of the following page:
http://www.real.com/resources/
I clicked the audio triangle near the top of this page, which downloaded the file called ‘HHC-201402241308.ram’ to my ‘Downloads’ folder. I then double-clicked the file ‘HHC-201402241308.ram’ and it started streaming the 1:08:00 audio file to my RealPlayer software.
I just listened to Dr. Martin Pall’s and Dr. Paul Dart’s excellent 2/24/14 presentation to the State of Oregon’s House Committee On Health Care and read the supporting documents (which I uploaded to my public DropBox for easy access). Just click the following links to download the any of the documents to your computer or device.
2014-0224-Oregon-State-Health-
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
2014-0224-Martin-Pall-35597.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
2014-0224-Martin-Paul-35551.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
2014-0224-Paul-Dart-35549.pdf (curriculum vitae)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
2014-0224-Paul-Dart-35552.pdf (scientific paper)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
2014-0224-Paul-Dart-36431.pdf (presentation – part 1)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
2014-0224-Paul-Dart-36430.pdf (presentation – part 2)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
2014-0224-Shawn-Abrell-35793.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
2014-0224-Recording-Log.pdf (time log of speakers)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.
I will send this information to all of my school administrators who have the legal responsibility, accountability and liability to provide a safe learning environment for our public schools. I would encourage each of them to spend the 1-2 hours it takes to listen to this presentation, review the supporting materials and then take appropriate, effective actions:
1. Immediately stop all installation of wireless networking equipment and infrastructure in CA public schools and switch these Common Core funds to improving the schools’ existing wired networking infrastructure instead. A very good solution, complete with 3D classroom drawings, can be seen at http://rfemf.com.
2. Ban the use of any educational device that does not offer a wired connectivity option. This leaves a lot of devices on the ‘approved list’: Android tablets, Windows 8 tablets, ChomeOS Chromebooks, any netbooks and any laptops that enable the use of Micro-USB-to-USB-to-Ethernet adapters. This leaves the Apple iPad on the ‘unapproved list’, until Apple creates a Lightning-to-USB-to-Ethernet adapter and sofware driver that will enable wired connectivity. This is a simple problem that Apple could solve in a few months, with enough pressure from schools.
3. Anyone who has the legal responsibility, accountability and liability for providing a safe environment in public schools, please do not ignore this critically important information.
TRY CLICKING THE SMALL CIRCLE NEXT TO THE DATE OF THE PRESENTATION: FEB 24. THAT’LL DO IT. STARTS AT ABOUT 8 MINUTES.DMOn Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:08 AM, Malone Debbie <debbie.malone@state.or.us> wrote:Rep. Keny –Guyer’s office asked if a cd could be made of the Microwave portion of the informational meeting. I contacted media and informed the representative a cd would be possible. I was under the impression the arrangements for the cd were with Rep. Keny-Guyer. I did not inquired about a dvd but a cd. I will happy to contact media about a dvd for you or you may contact them at 503-986- 1196. Here is the link to the 2/24 meeting. https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2014R1/Committees/HHC/ 2014-02-24-13-00/ MeetingMaterials If you have any questions please contact me.
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Hidden in plain view on March 15, 2014
BY BARRY LEVINSON
DID ANYONE SUSPECT IT WOULD TAKE THIS LONG FOR THE FPD AND CITY MANAGER TO COME TO THE SAME RECOMMENDATION THAT HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY SHOT DOWN FOR THE LAST 8 YEARS?
Fullerton’s City Manager Joe Felz
I wonder how many Fullertonians know that the city has given one tow truck company a monopoly on all Fullerton city business since the 1960’s, approximately 50 years. We all know that a lack of competition is bad for the consumer and for the taxpayer. It drives prices up. So why has the FPD including new chief Dan Hughes fought so hard to keep that business in the hands of just one tow truck company, Anaheim Towing. I asked Dan Hughes that question shortly after he became Acting Police Chief. He denied that he cared one way or the other but then the consultant report the FPD contracted for proposed to give all the business again to Anaheim Towing,with only a very small amount of actual work to go to a back-up company that would only be called if Anaheim Towing was not able to handle all work.
The city council had specifically instructed our city manager, Joe Felz to initiate a RFP (Request for Proposal) to go out soliciting bids to divide up the Fullerton City tow truck work between at least two or three different companies equally. What was Mr. Felz’s answer when asked by the council why he had failed to do what the council instructed him to do? He said he misunderstood the council’s instructions. So many more months were wasted because the city manager did not understand the instructions and for some reason never thought to ask the council for clarification or go back to the video that is online for every council meeting.This consultant report was done by former police officers, now consultants. After they presented it to the council in 2012, they had to admit that all their data was straight from the FPD without any verification by the consultants themselves. This is not an audit but in the accounting business is known as a compilation because all they are doing is compiling information given to them into a user-friendly format. These reports are understood to provide no assurances that the information is correct since no effort was undertaken to verify any of the information contained in this compilation report. So the city paid these consultants tens of thousands of dollars for a report that added little or no value. Good job FPD! Unfortunately, many city governments request this type of consultant report rather frequently. A city tells the consultant what conclusions they want to see and the consultant for a handsome fee is glad to provide a very nice report that supports the cities desired results. These reports may not be completely inaccurate or misleading but fall short of the totally objective reports that the public both deserves and should demand.Based on this revelation it was back to the drawing board for the FPD to come up with a better plan! That was supposed to take 4-6 months. Now two years later, I see another attempt by the FPD, the presenting department to get a new tow-trucking contract passed by council on March 18, 2014. After all these many years, with various different councils trying to get a new towing contract with several new tow trucking companies to support our FPD, we see a very familiar recommendation from our FPD. They have rated the same company we have given a monopoly to for over 50 years as the top rated company, Anaheim-Fullerton (formerly Anaheim Towing) and they recommend that we give all the business to only one or at most two companies. FPD must believe that monopolies are good and competition is bad!However, FPD should know that monopolies with the same company are not the way to go forward. We have seen the problems related to towing companies and their relationships with several California cities including El Monte. Should we not heed some of the past and current council members who state it is time to give this contract to different tow companies? I am just having a real hard time understanding what the FPD considers fair andcompetitive when they continue to cling to recommending one company above all others for the last 50 plus years! My education,(MBA), work experience (Ernst & Young CPA firm and Northrop Grumman), in the financial, accounting and auditing fields informs me that having a monopoly with the same company for over 50 years is a terrible business practice. The fact that the FPD wants to extend this practice should send up red flags over every residence and business in this city.
Barry Levinson
Posted by Joe Imbriano in The twighlight's last gleaming on March 11, 2014
by BARRY LEVINSON:
LOYAL CITIZENS OF FULLERTON ARE STILL WAITING FOR POLICE CHIEF HUGHES TO MAKE GOOD ON HIS PROMISE TO THE PEOPLE OF FULLERTON!
Soon after Dan Hughes became Acting Police Chief in January 2012, he gave an interview with the local press. He was quoted as saying the following: “If somebody says there is a culture of corruption,they’re either lying, they have other motives or they are grossly misinformed.”
With those words, you loudly proclaimed that there were no pervasive problems or corruption within your beloved FPD based presumably on your 29 years of being an integral member of that department.Many citizens of Fullerton disagree with the police chief’s assessment. But then again as a 29-year veteran on the force, it might be difficult for Hughes to admit any real problems within the department that he has been an integral part of for almost three decades. He did indicate that the only real problem with his FPD was its failure to keep the public better informed. So at the March 4, 2014 council meeting, we stated that Hughes has failed to live up to that promise as well!
This was the challenge we presented to Chief Hughes. Fullerton Police Corporal Hugo Garcia was arrested on felony grand theft charges brought by the county district attorney’s office and reported in all the local papers in mid-February. http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Fullerton-Cop-Faces-Felony-Charges-for-Fraud-Embezzlement-245949031.html
But the one place you will not see that important local news story is in Dan Hughes official FPD website entitled “Fullerton Police News”. In fact as of the night of the last council meeting ,March 4th the City of Fullerton website. How did they overlook this ladies and gentleman? After all Dan gave his word that he would personally make sure that the information, the news about our FPD would be much improved under his new administration., you would not find that story mentioned anywhere on Well now it is March 26, 22 days after we challenged Hughes on this point and still not a whisper about this police officer’s felony arrest!So we rechecked Dan’s official Fullerton Police News website once again to see if any mention of the arrest of Officer Garcia was posted since the city council meeting. Remember, even Jan Flory the unofficial cheerleader (in my opinion) for the police asked Dan to correct this problem at March 4th council meeting.
As of March 26, 2014, there is still not a word about it. But the FPD did have the time to make the additional unrelated posts on March 5, March 10, March 11,March 15, two posts on March 17, March 18, and March 19,2014. (Please also note that the March 17 news story of arelative abusing a child conveniently left out the fact that the alleged child abuser is LA Police Officer Daniel Hun Chun, 39.That fact http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/orange_county&id=9475818 was prominently mentioned in every other TV, radio and newspaper stories covering this arrest. LA Police Officer Chun allegedly hit a teen relative repeatedly with a variety of household items on March 13, “leaving welts and bruises,”according to a statement released by the Orange County District Attorney’s Office.
He was charged with one felony count of child abuse and one felony count of corporal injury on a child and faces up to six years in state prison!)There are many stories about our FPD under Fullerton Police Newsand they always have one thing in common, they are all positive stories about our men and women in blue.So when Dan Hughes admitted that the FPD had to improve its communication to the people of Fullerton, he apparently meant that the department needed better Public Relations only. It has not meant a more complete, open and transparent reporting of both positive and even sometimes negative news as well. And now ladies and gentleman thanks to Dan Hughes and Joe Felz, our city manager,city we the taxpayers are paying a new communication consultant to do just that: to provide the FPD with better PR articles to disseminate through the Fullerton Police News (launched by Bill Rams of Cornerstone Communications) and also through the Fullerton News-Tribune which is a Thursday section of our Orange County Register.
The FPD thanks to the OC Register basically gets a twofer, two for the price of one. You see this consultant gets paid to write these puff pieces on the FPD and then the OC register essentially reprint them in their paper under the title “guest columnist” in the opinion section. Except this guest keeps on returning, writing guest columnafter guest column after guest column. (I guess he is the type ofguest that never leaves.) And to think we the taxpayers are payingthis consultant a lot of money just to improve the tarnished image ofour FPD!This new FPD consultant cost is in addition to the cost we arealready paying for police public relations as part of Fullerton policespokesman, Sergeant Jeff Stuart police pay. Many people could be hired to perform Sergeant Stuart’s police spokesman duties ata greatly reduced rate of pay.
You see ladies and gentlemen, we are paying Sergeant Stuart at least $140,000 to $150,000 a year(for salary and benefits) to perform in part this non-police officer function. Please note that someone making 50% – 60% less couldvery competently perform that task.So with this as background as to how much the taxpayers are spending on this function, it is very disappointing that Chief Hughes felt it necessary to increase his public relations budget so significantly. The sad truth is that we the taxpayers are paying for all these one-sided positive feel-good police stories. I for one do not feel good about this at all because it is so self-serving rather than serving the public!
Now it has been over two years since Dan Hughes gave us that empty promise to improve communicating all issues relating to theFPD to the people of Fullerton. How much longer Dan are you going to make us wait until you keep that promise? Another year, two years or maybe that will be your successor’s responsibility. And finally Dan, just as a little reminder to you sir, your website does say “NEWS” in the title as in “Fullerton Police News”!
Barry Levinson
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on March 8, 2014
This is their utopia and to us a perplexing set of images : https://thefullertoninformer.com/what-is-wrong-with-this-picture/
I believe that the frequency specific wireless proliferation coupled with precisely engineered metallic nano components in the forced vaccinations comprise an agenda to affect fertility and the elect scientists and top government leaders are compromised at the highest levels. The emperor has no clothes right now. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Forced irradiation of school children on February 18, 2014
The most recent mid Febuary Fullerton Observer hit the stands the other day. I have to give credit to the crew over there as The Observer is the only paper that will touch this wireless classroom issue with a ten foot pole and that is truly commendable. You know there is a lot going on in this town that would qualify under the term of “inconvenient truth”. The fact is, no one cares to deal with inconvenient truths. Sadly, when those two words end up in the same sentence, it’s lights out meatball for logic and hello Dolly for cognitive dissonance. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Joe Imbriano in Hidden in plain view on February 7, 2014
Folks, there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch and every gimmick has a catch. Whether or not you agree with the thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies and researchers that conclude wireless is harmful, the privacy aspect of city wide WiFi is a whole other issue.
Yes ladies and gentlemen, Agenda 21 is a Fullerton thing. Make no bones about it. You all need to be aware that the euphemism “sustainable development” has been whispered into your ear instead of the real deal which is Agenda 21.
HIGH RISE, SARDINE CAN HOUSING CLOAKED BY AN ALL SEEING WIRELESS MICROWAVE MATRIX IS THE MODEL.
STACK ‘EM HIGH, PACK ‘EM IN, FLIP THE SWITCH AND BATHE THEM IN THE EMISSIONS.
Several months ago, I mentioned to the council that building codes should be amended to include RF shielding in multifamily housing units. Ironically, Jan Flory feebly attempted to mock my Autism/wireless hypothesis and publicly conjure up the notion that my wireless concerns have no business being presented to the council, I politely reminded her that a lot more towers were coming. Well maybe they finally are. Folks you cannot afford to look the other way on this one.>
Wireless infrastructure and wireless devices are being peddled to us as a benefit. They are being jammed down our children’s throats in the classrooms as a necessity and the infrastructure is creeping ever closer to our homes and businesses disguised as palm trees or literally in plain view. By no means am I alone in believing the general health, well being, and most importantly, the fertility of us and our children is on the line.
HERE ARE ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND THIRTY SIX Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation RIGHT HERE
http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/Electrosmog-Bibliography-COLLECTIONS,28,3376–
What Citywide WiFi amounts to is a massive V.I.P. back door entrance to the wireless devices’ trap doors for electronic eavesdropping purposes. They also make the entire matrix including anything connected to it extremely vulnerable to cyber attacks.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/proofpoint-uncovers-internet-things-iot-173000187.html
Don’t kid yourselves folks, the NSA is as strong as ever and WiFi networks are about as secure as a Brazilian bank account.
Don’t fall for the latest smoke and mirrors filled theater to get your eyes off of the ball. http://benswann.com/breaking-maryland-legislators-move-to-kill-nsa-headquarters/
Yeah, and next they will tell about the layoffs that are coming at the NSA.
They don’t need the building anymore because they moved to the basement long ago.
EVERY WIRELESS, WIFI ENABLED DEVICE IS A TWO WAY TRANSMITTER. THEY ALL HAVE BUILT IN TRAP DOORS THAT CAN BE ACCESSED REMOTELY.
WHETHER IT BE A CELLPHONE, TABLET, LAPTOP, DESKTOP, TV, DVR, DECT PHONE, SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM, BABY MONITOR, SMART APPLIANCES, STOVE, OVEN, FRIDGE, XBOX, PLAYSTATION, AND WHATEVER ELSE THAT GETS ADDED TO THE LIST, THEY ALL CAN OR DO OPERATE AND BROADCAST ON A FREQUENCY OF EITHER 2.4 OR 5.0 GHz. THIS COULD BESTOW THE WIFI NETWORKS’ OPERATORS, AUTHORIZED OR NOT, CARTE BLANCE ACCESS TO EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR LIFE. WITH THE OLD WIRED CONNECTIONS, THEY WOULD NEED TO TAP INTO EACH OF THE DEVICES’ WIRES. NOW WHAT THEY HAVE EFFECTIVELY DONE IS WIRED ALL THE CONNECTIONS TO THEIR SYSTEM WITHOUT A WIRE. AND YOU THOUGHT THEY WERE DOING ALL THIS TO MAKE YOUR LIFE EASIER? YEAH RIGHT.
Snowden is leaking because they want you to look at the dinosaur and the outdated building hooked up to the old copper wires. You see, while behind your backs, and under your noses, in your bedrooms, living rooms, kitchens and classrooms and even in your kids laps, they now potentially have unlimited access. Now they could theoretically just push a button and tap into all of the wireless networks and decide what channel they want to watch. Warrants? What are those? Fusion centers? Are those Japanese restaurants?
The old copper wire infrastructure used to require several city blocks of Cray computers and a 10,000 heads to log and keep tabs on us. Well, now with everything wireless, they can take the show on the road, utilize other infrastructure and some of the apparatuses can now fit into a large van on a street corner with current advances in technology.
City wide WiFi also amounts to a form of forced irradiation at both 2.4 and 5.0 GHz at power levels that are trillions of times the normal background levels in that particular part of the electromagnetic spectrum. For the record, Fukashima is elevating our background levels of ionizing radiation by less than a factor of one. WiFi by a factor of a trillion, so tell me about all this “low power” nonsense. FCC exposure guidelines green light emission levels below cooking of tissue. They deviously, totally ignore non-thermal effects.
https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-epa-tells-it-like-it-is-will-the-fsd/
Waves of non ionizing radiation have energy and in the presence of metals can be amplified tremendously. Stick a fork in a microwave and watch 3 million volts in action come out of a 110 volt appliance.
WiFi is low power compared to what? A microwave oven? Long term, the residents will be paying for it in more ways than they can imagine. The RF industry’s irresponsible, reckless, and unabated proliferation of these devices along with their pulse modulated microwave emissions has been given the green light by design. Slick Willy got the Agenda 21 ball rolling in 1993 when he doled out the dough for the APA to write a land use legislative blueprint for every municipality in The U.S. Then he signed the Telecom Act after a night on the town with his Glass Steagall repealing party buddies and set it all in motion. Come to think of it, this was right around the time he mandated the chiva slamming hooker vaccine(the hepatitis shot) for newborns which is given to babies within minutes of birth. The point is that there are and have been problems at the highest levels for some time now and they have us running on a treadmill chasing our tails while they cook our goose and close the walls in. Oh yeah and the lip service begins while the trojan horse rolls into town.
http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/07/secret-court-approves-new-limits-on-nsa-collected-phone-records/
Regardless of whether or not you have health concerns about wireless, you are not alone and this site contains no less than 75 unique posts containing studies and links to thousands of other studies that are sure to get your attention and maybe even prove to you that beyond a shadow of a doubt, at the very least, wireless has no place in our children’s classrooms, much less on the light pole next to your child’s bedroom window. Even if you remain unconvinced of the health hazards, you still would have reason to be gravely concerned over the potential for 4th amendment violations with this technology.
I think what Snowden leaked is just the tip of the iceberg. The technology is decades ahead of what they allow us to be privy too.
If you ever had any privacy concerns, I would say the following article would be worthy of your undivided attention.
Exclusive
Recent Comments